We can thank Mazda for adding a lot of spice to the automotive landscape. Their compact, smooth and high-revving rotary engine started (and ended) in the most obvious of places: under the hood of sports cars. But during the seventies, they were busy putting the rotary engine into all sorts of other applications, some quite unexpected. There was a rotary pickup truck called the REPU, the compact family sedan Rx-2, then a compact car with sporty intentions, the Rx-3. But they weren’t done yet.
They even put a rotary engine were it didn’t really seem to make sense, like the engine bay of a big, bulky Holden to create the Roadpacer. Hooking the rotary engine to a three speed gearbox gave it even worse fuel economy than the Holden six it replaced, but the lower displacement did get it into a lower tax rate which was likely the whole point of the exercise. But needless to say it was not a sales success.
Even more bizarre was the Parkway bus which was powered by the same rotary engine with several times the weight. Contemporary ad literature touts the smoothness of the engine as luxury feature but I’d imagine the ride would turn pretty leisurely at even a hint of a hill. Only Lada would top this rotary silliness with a four rotor powered tank.
But back with Mazda: oddly enough, didn’t see fit to produce a pure sports car during this time (until the RX-7 in 1978) even after proving the concept with the Cosmo. The idea of a turbine smooth, high revving rotary engine and a sports car seem to go together naturally, but instead Mazda was mucking around with pickups, buses and even the anti-thesis of sporty – the station wagon.
There surely can’t be too many rotary wagons left in this sort of original condition anymore. Like any semi-affordable sporty sort of car they suffered from enthusiastic drivers who used them right up. Later their numbers were reduced drastically by rust and failed apex seals. Station wagons are quite often the first body style to be turned into parts cars for their more flashy siblings as well. Back even ten years ago it wouldn’t have been worth mucking about rebuilding an engine in one of these. But now that rotary powered 1970s Mazdas are quite desirable with a low number of survivors it is rare to see one in original, driver condition.
Sure, there are a decent number of rusty project level cars kicking around that are still beyond economical restoration and of course plenty of show quality cars. Most of the survivors have been modified as well with bigger wheels, engine swaps, etc. But what we have here appears to be a stock survivor.
The Rx-4 was Mazda’s attempt to add some luxury while retaining the sportiness. Based on the Luce/929 platform, it sported a 110hp 13B rotary engine in the North American market. Other markets started off with the smaller displacement but higher output 12A engine. The Rx-4 was larger than the Rx-2 which itself was larger than the Rx-3. While the engine was quite exotic, they all were quite conventional otherwise with front strut suspension with a live rear axle at the rear. Recirculating ball steering was quite good for what it is, but not as sporty or precise as a rack and pinion set up. Like the Rx-3, the Rx-4 was offered in sedan, coupe and wagon form.
The Rx-4 coupe was even a hardtop befitting its status as the top of the line Mazda.
A wagon like this obviously gained a few pounds over the coupe or sedan (Wikipedia tells me 300lbs more than the coupe) but performance was still very impressive for the era with a 0-60 sprint of just 11.7 seconds. Just the thing to get the kids to soccer practice on time!
This particular example would be a 1974 or 1975 example since it is pre-1976 facelift but sporting the big, battering ram style impact bumpers. I’m leaning towards 1974 as it doesn’t have the bumper over riders. The original front plate (eliminated here in 1991) and AAA sticker on the rear bumper indicate long term ownership. It even has a block heater plug neatly wrapped up in the grill.
The styling works quite well in my opinion if one can look past the bumpers. There are, however, a few areas that could only be ’70s Japanese. Look at those wild door handles. And what the heck is going on with the rub strip on the rear door? I wonder if they were a dealer option as I’ve only seen them on one other example but they cover a little character crease on the door. Or perhaps like stock hub caps on a Datsun 240Z, they were all tossed right away due to excessive ugliness.
How about this oddball, rectangular exhaust tip with the smaller secondary exhaust? The secondary one is for the thermal reactor which is a system for reducing emissions. Basically fresh air is injected into a secondary combustion chamber built into the exhaust manifold. This required the engine to run rich and is partly responsible for the poor fuel economy of the rotary engine.
Here is the set up from a 1980 Mazda Rx-7 which is similar except the injected air is pre-heated to make significant fuel economy gains.
The steering wheel can only be described as different. Almost French different. At the front it has quite an aggressive looking beak to it. Sadly the 1976 facelift neutered it with a more generic Mercedes inspired front end. At the rear, the wagon doesn’t get the rotary specific quad tail lights but instead sticks with the 929 wagon units.
So cheers to the owner of this classic Mazda for keeping it alive all these years. And also for not buggering it up with a set of modern and massive rims. The paint surely isn’t perfect but it wears it well. Perhaps I’m especially fond of it as it seems to be the exact color (of my 808 coupe) and in about the same condition.
I remember about twenty years ago my dad and I were at the Citrus County Speedway in Inverness, FL and they were letting non-race people bring their cars on the track and race them. A guy had one of these. It outran just about everyone there. I wanted one!
Of course I never got it. And I haven’t seen one since now.
i love everything about this car, even the weird side molding and the engine block heater plug. rotary engine, stick shift and a wagon all in one car!
Ha! I thought that rear piece of side trim was just falling off – had to look a second and third time…you’re right – weird…
Love Japanese styling from this era, when they were still mostly tinkering with variations on foreign cues. Droop some chrome trim over the rear wheelarch, and voila–a sort-of Coke-bottle beltline on a wagon!
The RX-4’s steering wheel merits a special mention, too, resembling a bird-eating tarantula leaping onto the driver’s face.
Today’s market hardly allows for brave experiments like a rotary-powered manual-shift wagon. I’d like to think there’s a little of this car in the four-door, nominally practical, and absolutely sweet-driving Mazda RX-8.
Back about 1980 or so, I got a ride in a college professor’s new 626. I asked what it was like living with a rotary, and was saddened to find out that it was a conventional piston engine. That is as close as I ever got to a Mazda rotary.
This is a cool car. The shadetree engineer in me loves the rotary engine, but I am sure that it takes a special breed of cat to own one for a long time.
I’ve owned two – both first generation Rx-7s. Fantastic engine. Revs to the moon and so buttery smooth. My 1981 Rx-7 was amazingly reliable too. I loved that car. My 1985 not so much. I’m glad I’ve owned a rotary engine but not sure I’d own another.
The rotary engine nearly bankrupted Mazda in the 70’s. When the first “gas shock” occurred, the poor gas mileage killed their sales. Ford came to the rescue with a significant investment and the rotary engines were taken out of most of their cars – surely by 1980 the rotary was only in the RX model. And Ford only recently ended their “relationship” by selling their significant stake in Mazda.
In North America the first generation Rx-7 replaced all other rotary cars. In some other markets the more GT like Cosmo remained.
The GLC really pulled Mazda through that time.
As did the Miata later. The rotary was a fun engine and vehicle to work with (I. Worked as a mazda tech from ’74 to ’84). I had several RX4 Wagons. I even put trailer hitches on them . Used to pull 2 horse horse trailer. Or a 15 ft camper through the Black hills. Such a nice riding car.
My first mazda was a 72 B 1600 I have owned a Mazda vehicle since 1974 from that pu to mpv ‘s to 2001 B4000 at present . Wow thats 44years. Still long for the rotary days!
Great find; I’ve had my eyes out for one for years. There were lots of these in LA back in the day, and they made a distinctive popping/farting sound from their exhaust/thermal reactor, on over-run when upshifting. I can hear it in my mind’s ear…brrappp-poppitypopp.
“brrappp-poppitypopp.”
My old 1961 Chevy Bel-Air 235 stick made that same sound when downshifting and coasting when the octane selector wasn’t adjusted correctly!
I owned a 1985 Rx-7 which had slowly failing apex seals on it. This made for hard warm starts. Basically you had floor the accelerator, turn the key for 30 seconds and it would eventually start with a nice little fireball out the exhaust. Of course it had a lightened flywheel and aftermarket clutch too which made it very easy to stall. In my infinite wisdom I was using this as my commuter car when we lived in the big city. I’m sure I was popular with fellow commuters with occasionally shooting out a fireball in heavy traffic. Oddly enough that would cure them of tailgating …
What would be Japanese for “Farting Uncle”? That would be a cute nickname.
Actually this era of Mazda was less likely to rust that many other Japanese cars vehicles of the period.
My buddy had a RX-4 wagon for awhile. He had a Rotary Pickup and “blew” the transmission so it was originally picked up as a parts car for $100 that “needed” a new engine, or so the owner was told. We had had a particularly cold snap and that had activated the system to inject anti-freeze into the chambers to prevent the seals from being damaged by freezing to the walls of the chamber. When it wouldn’t start the mechanic she had taken it to had incorrectly diagnosed it as a “cracked block”. It ran well so he drove it for awhile until we pulled the trans and put it in his pickup. When we got the trans out of the pickup we found the culprit was that snapped shift shaft. Out of curiosity we called the dealer to see if it was available and how much. Sure enough it was available and only about $25, though it took a week or more to get it. Once back together we put that trans back in the wagon and he was a 2 car man and he drove the wagon a fair amount which got slightly better MPG and of course had room for more people a fair amount.
I dont know if anything other than the coupe had a rotary engine here and even those were quite rare. Nowdays the ricer crowd installs Rotary engines in nearly anything though stupidity like the Roadpacer hasnt been repeated. Most Holden Premiers had at least a 253 cube 8 replacing it with a torque free buzzbomb what were they thinking?
You’ve got to keep in mind that in the early 70’s the rotary was predicted to be the engine of the future. GM spent untold amounts of money developing their own and it was intended to bet the engine for the Vega. AMC had intended to buy those GM rotarys for their vehicles including the Pacer which was designed to have rotary power from the start. Go to googlebooks.com and look at early 70’s issues of Popular Mechanics and Popular Science it was constantly in the “what’s new” section and there were also many full articles on the various mfg’s rotary plans.
I remember all that the general excitement surrounding the Wankel engine it was going to revolutionise the auto industry, but gas hitting $1 per gallon put a damper on it and most Mazdas imported were 4 bangers as rotaries were real hard to sell obviously in the US where gas remained very cheap that wasnt a problem but here if you bought a small car you expected good fuel economy. While these RE cars performed well they drank gas worse than large engined cars that went as well. They made good gravel road rally cars and race cars but that was the only market they had
I believe the RX-4 sedan was sold in OZ (actually longer than the coupe) — I don’t remember how long the wagon was available there.
While the Roadpacer had a Holden body, I don’t think it was sold in Australia, although a few ended up there. It was intended as a VIP car for Japan, sold in tiny numbers.
I’m pretty sure the wagon wasn’t available in Australia at all.Just the sedan and coupe.
I think you are correct that the Mazda Roadpacer was only available in Japan. As mentioned above it was a tax dodge.
I believe the Japanese treated the 13B as 1,962 cc for tax purposes, which wasn’t exactly cheap, but at least kept it out of the really hefty over-2.0-liter class. However, I think the big selling point was the credit for low-emissions vehicles; the Roadpacer had the AP (anti-pollution) package, which made it eligible for those incentives.
Ive seen a Roadpacer for sale in NZ
Never seen the Wagon in OZ only with the later flat front badged 929
Some of the Roadpacers have ended up in OZ or NZ, but I don’t think they were sold there originally — same goes for some of the other JDM cars, like the R130 Luce Rotary Coupé. Considering how much the Roadpacer AP cost, that’s not surprising…¥3.8 million. (I don’t know the exact exchange rate, but as best I can estimate, that was equivalent to something like NZ $15,000!)
New Zealand imports ship loads of used Japanese cars and has done for many years thats how they got here.
We got the RX2/3/4 as coupes and sedans, but not wagons – I think the wagons and utes were USA only, I don’t recall seeing them in the JDM brochures/magazines. We have plenty of fake rotary wagons and utes here though! The Roadpacer was a crazy idea – although there’s been one for sale on Trademe that’s been there for a couple years now which would be tempting for rarity’s sake! I have actually seen it in real life, and although the engine is tiny in the Holden’s enginebay, the amount of emission controls and other stuff they bunged on it filles the engine bay nicely, as the trademe pic shows:
Roadpacer Pic #2:
I had a 1974 Mazda RX4 Wagon which I bought new. It was a fine car. It did have the 13B engine in it, and surprisingly used a 4-barrel carb! Car had A/C and was a 4-speed. It was a fast car and I actually had it up to 130 mph. That rotary engine ran smooth as silk. I’m pretty sure that horsepower was more than mentioned earlier. Believe it was closer to 135 than 110. At the time I had my rotary there was a high performance company in California that had a rotary powered VW Beetle. Think it was called the Humbug (because the Rotary engines were called hummers) and the bug for Beetle. It would beat just about anything on the strip! Thanks for the memories!
If this car really still runs, shouldn’t it have a gearshift?
The interior and engine shots were taken from the internet.
I did an extensive history of the early Mazda rotaries last fall, so here are some addenda…
The Luce was introduced in 1966 as the first ‘big’ Mazda sedan. The original was styled by Bertone, and is a rather handsome car. It was sold in some export markets as the 1500 or 1800 (the 929 name came later), and survived until 1972.
The first Luce sedan wasn’t offered with a rotary, but there was a Luce Rotary Coupé (also known as R130), introduced in fall 1969. It was also styled by Bertone and looked a lot like a second-generation Corvair. It had a 13A rotary engine (not related to the later 13B) with 124 hp, and it had front-wheel drive, Mazda’s first. I don’t think it was officially exported, and it was very rare.
The second-generation Luce appeared in October 1972. It was an in-house design, not by Bertone, and it offered both the 1.8-liter piston engine and 12A rotary. It wasn’t exported until the facelifted Series 2 appeared in late 1973; export versions were generally called 929 with a piston engine and RX-4 with a rotary. The Series 2 was the first car with the 13B engine.
The revised thermal reactor (with preheated injection air) was added to all emissions-controlled rotaries for 1975. Toyo Kogyo was getting complaints about fuel consumption even before the OPEC embargo, and the fuel crisis nearly crippled them, so they came up with all kinds of modifications to improve gas mileage, including the new reactor system.
As far as I know, the Roadpacer AP was not intended for export (although a few ended up in Australia and elsewhere after the fact). I think it was JDM-only, aimed at the same sort of market as the Toyota Crown and Mitsubishi Debonair Executive. The rationale for using the 13B AP engine was low emissions — AP stood for “Anti-Pollution” in Japan. Although the implementation of actual auto emissions requirements ended up being fairly slow (it was a real political mess), the Japanese government tried to encourage people to buy more low-emissions vehicles by offering various tax incentives. Because the Roadpacer AP was eligible for those incentives, it gave Mazda a foot in the door to the executive market for what I assume was a pretty modest investment. I don’t think it mattered a whole lot that it was slow and thirsty — I strongly suspect that most of the 800 cars they sold ended up being chauffeur-driven anyway.
(Incidentally, the emissions issue was probably also responsible for the other rotary oddball, the Parkway Rotary 26 minibus.)
As for sports cars, well… Toyo Kogyo sold the Cosmo L10A/L10B through 1972, although I don’t think they made any money on it. By the mid-seventies, they had coupe versions of the Capella RE (RX-2), Savanna (RX-3), and Luce (RX-4), and there were Savanna GT and Luce GT models in Japan that were really quite sporty. Since it wasn’t a two-seater, I suppose you could say the Savanna GT coupe was a sporty car, rather than a sports car — sort of a Japanese Z/28 or Trans Am. It had a rather epic racing career, and it was very popular in Japan.
When Toyo Kogyo realized that the rotary wasn’t going to work out for mainstream cars after all, they looked at the success of the Savanna/RX-3 coupe and decided that they would focus on the sporty aspect, which led to the RX-7 (also called Savanna in Japan). They also kept the rotary for the Luce and Cosmo luxury cars, but they no longer exported them after about 1979.
Back in the day, quite a few of these old rotary wagons were cannibalized for their motors: stick a rotary in an MG Midget or a Triumph Spitfire, and you have an INSANELY fast sports car…
That Holden Roadpacer looks suspiciously like a ’71 Impala from the front and a ’74-’75 Impala sedan from the side. Anyone else notice that?
Mazda used the HJ/1975 Holden Premier body which is the upscale Holden on that wheelbase. Its actually built on a Chev Camaro floor pan and used 253 & 308 cube V8 engines though Mazda fitted their little buzzbomb to it mustve been crap on hills.
No. Not the Camaro floor pan at all. The Holden used a 4 link & coil rear suspension, the Camaro, leaf springs.
Different wheel bases too. Some suspension components interchange, and the wheels as well.
Roadpacer front:
And rear:
Side:
And interior:
> …different. Almost French different…
You got me. I like me some French difference! Especially the late lamented Citroen kind. This is a close second.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a non-highly-modified RX2/3/4. Two schoolfriends had RX2s in 1991 while I was at school, but as with all the ones I’ve ever seen they had big wheels and big exhausts. I can honestly say I have never seen one of those original exhausts with the funny little secondary pipe – although it looks so odd, the ubiquitous large replacement exhausts are probably an improvement! I test-drove an RX4 sedan in the early 90s, loved the bulky instrument panel, but my mechanic Dad would have killed me if I bought any form of rotary…! Mind you, I had our company RX8 the other day, and it’s a fantastic wee thing.
I’ve noticed that, as well. I saw a bunch of cars at a recent Japanese car show, but almost all of them had been modified in some way, at the very least with wider wheels and tires (not surprising, given the skinny stock rubber). I think there were two RX-3 wagons that were mostly stock, one even with the original wheelcovers.
Of course, at the same show it was even harder to find a 240Z that hadn’t been modified, in some cases almost beyond recognition.
The wildest modded Z-car I ever saw was one where the owner shoehorned the entire Altima / Maxima V6 FWD powertrain into the back of an early Z.
The fab work on the engine cradle and cover was first-rate. The rest of the car looked like garbage though.
Exactly the kind of car that Curbside Classic is all about, and that you don’t see anywhere else. A really interesting car, that would be dismissed by most people as a tired old Japanese car. Either that, or it would be attacked with horrible paint jobs, nasty rims and annoying exhaust.
A rare find, and a well-written write up. Thanks.
In early 1975, my wife and I bought our first brand-new car – a left-over ’74 RX-4 sedan in blue from the local Mazda dealer in Torrance, CA. A few months later, we decided w needed a second car, and I spotted a low mile ’74 RX-4 wagon (in yellow – same as your feature photo) on the used car lot of the same Mazda dealer. The wagon had A/C, too. Loved that wagon, as long as the gas prices were reasonable. It’s one of the vehicles I wish I never sold.
My wife and I bought a brand new 1974 RX-4 Sedan with a Rotary engine. A few weeks later we drove from California to Indiana in 3 days. The thing was so smooth and quiet, as we were crossing the desert in Arizona, we got pulled over for speeding. When the Cop asked how fast I was going, I said that I had No idea. I told him it was a New Rotary Engine and that it was So Smooth and Quiet, I guess I just let it all hang out. He could see that we had Low mileage so I wasn’t used to driving it. I popped the Hood and we spent almost an hour looking the thing over and talking. In the End, he just gave me a Verbal Warning and let us go. Nice Guy. I offered to let him drive it, but he said “Thanks but No Thanks.”. Our whole trip was wonderful. I wish I still had that car. Oh Well ! Such is Life ! I’m so sorry to hear that Mazda stopped offering the Rotary, but I can understand their reasons. “Thank You, Mazda, for a wonderful experience!”
I had an 1974 RX-4 station wagon back in the early 80’s. Quick lil car! Only had a 4 speed transmission tho. Needed a 5 speed bad. Poor gas mileage.
But the rotary is the way to go!
I had three rotary powered vehicles, an RX4 four door sedan, a pickup, and the RX4 wagon, they were all nice, quiet, and powerful enough for their size. Anyone of them could climb the mountain passes without slowing. The pickup was the quietest pickup I’ve ever owned and I’ve had a bunch. My favorite rotary was the wagon. In those days I traveled on the job alot and the wagon made that easy. I’m tall, it was comfortable, got decent mileage and was hands down the best vehicle (including many four wheel drives) on slick or snow covered roads. The wagon, a five speed, did suffer from a transmission whine, but was always repaired under warranty regardless of mileage. Wish I had never sold it. Bought a 280 Z – not a good move!
This was my first car in 1981. It was the 1974 wagon. I only had it 3 months until it shit the bed on the high speed lane of the Dan Ryan Expressway on Christmas Eve. Went to get a tow, came back and the car had been totalled. There was almost nothing left. I didn’t have enough time to get to love the car.
I had an RX -4 wagon. The speedometer topped at 140, but one day I put it to the floor on the highway. It was an unassuming and unreliable car, but I hit 140 with ease and then some. It seemed to have no top end. Unbelievable.
I had the ’75 RX-4 Wagon. Bought it new near Denver while temporarily stationed at Lowry AFB. It was a gem. Top three of best vehicles I have ever owned – ultra-reliable. I drove it back to my home base, MCAS Santa Ana, Calif. (LTA) after completing some coursework at Lowry – and it was an amazing drive. Did it non-stop – except for fuel. Across Nevada it was happy at 90-100mph cruise and didn’t raise a sweat. One thing I learned about rotaries….you need to tune it often. I did mine at least monthly – and it was a tricky tune with the dual sets of points…..When I sold it in 1978…it had 120,000 miles (I drove a lot with USMC commitments across Southern California) on it and still like new. Original engine and still running perfectly. Other Mazda owners I knew were changing engines about as often as I changed my oil. Absolutely happy with mine….In ’78 I left the Marine Corps and got a job in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia….stayed there for years….and bought a Mazda 929 wagon after I arrived there – which was the same car – but with a petrol engine. It was very reliable too…I have been living in Australia since 1983 and still miss the RX-4 – it was amazing. Never seen a wagon for sale here….a few sedans…but horribly expensive. Fair number of RX-3’s but they are just not the same……