We’re not allowed out except foe essential activity at the moment. Despite what a Curbivore may think, poking about a used car dealership or looking through an auction pre-sale inventory is not considered an essential journey. So, we resort to the online sources, and go window shopping to fulfil fantasy garage dreams, and resist the temptation of the “Buy Now” button. Sometimes, that’s hard, as you’ll see in a few minutes.
But what to buy admire at a safe electronic distance? Let’s take our cue from TV advertising!
Back in 1977, Leyland Cars (as it was known at that time) had quite a complex range, with many brands, some old, some made up, some regular Joe cars, some special purposes only, and all from the same government owned stable. Some brands lent themselves to TV promotion – Mini or Princess for example and some didn’t – Jaguar, Range Rover, and some suffered from only othering old product, such as the Morris Marina and Austin Allegro. So, Leyland Cars had to come up with a composite advertisement that caught most, allowed the new to be promoted and let the glamour be read across to the unglamorous. Here’s that’s 1977 advert in full.
Supercover was Leyland Cars’ warranty package, with breakdown recovery and generous mileage limits.
So, which shall it be? I’ve managed to find examples of each on auction and sale sites over the last week or so, some better than others.
First is the Austin Allegro. The green car in the montage shot is clearly a modestly upscale version, with a vinyl roof. The closest I can find is this 1977 car that is closer to the French registered car in the film.
Engine size were not reported in the advertisement – but this car is clearly an A series 1300, the most popular engine in the Allegro.
This car was in Ireland, with a reported 18,000 miles only. There aren’t many Allegros for sale these days, but there is still an active and proud owners’ community.
Was it a bad car? Was it the worst car BL built? Probably not, but it didn’t hit the spot as it was supposed to, and as the ADO16 had done. The awkward styling was partly to blame, as was the square steering wheel on early cars, and these gave an easy way in for the critics, along with the lack of a hatchback and stories (some true, some anecdotal, some blatant nonsense, but many believed) about quality and reliability, and which were enough to prevent it succeeding.
Next along, the MGB roadster. Have you seen how much these are going for these days? £10,000 is no guarantee of a top car, a very early or very late car (the 1981 LE anniversary editions for example) can be £17,000 or more. You can get a very nice Alfa Romeo Spyder (Graduate) for that…….
This is a 1976 car, albeit modified with the wire wheels, old style leather (-ette) seats rather than gaudy stripes, and non-standard steering wheel.
The side markers are not UK specification either, so I wonder if there’s been a bit of re-importing going on? Where from?
The seller proudly announces there are “no leaks, which is rare for an MG”. Otherwise, it appears to be well presented and maintained, and low mileage. The black rubber bumpers get a bad press, for raising the ride height and messing up the handling and styling, but to me they work visually with the bright colours of this period.
Another old car that was being pressed into continued service was the Triumph Dolomite, which may be more unfamiliar to North American readers. Triumph fans like to draw parallels between this and the BMW 1602/2002, or even as the precursor to the BMW 3 Series. In reality, it was a rear wheel drive derivative of the front wheel drive 1965 Triumph 1300 saloon. That car had a longitudinally mounted four cylinder engine with the gearbox underneath.
In 1971, when it was already seven years old, BLMC extended the tail, updated the front end and interior, and added a version of the 1854cc slant-4 engine developed in partnership with Saab (for the original 99) with around 90bhp. The prime Dolomite was the 127bhp Sprint, with an innovative 16 valve single camshaft 2 litre engine. This version had some success in circuit racing and rallying.
Inside, the car had a traditionally finished if attractively styled interior with space for four (really). Image wise, this car was upscale of the Ford Cortina or Vauxhall Victor, below a Rover. Was it equivalent to a BMW?
Well, it was also styled by Michelotti, and fitted the sporting saloon template reasonably well. But it was hard to hide the 1960s and smaller car origins, especially as this was on the market until 1981.
This example clearly has a history. It has been fitted with the engine from a Triumph TR7, which was an eight valve version of the Sprint engine. Overdrive was a common option, and standard on some versions, and this car has it.
In the UK, by the time of this advertisement, Triumph saloons most definitely have an image as an old person’s car – they were not seen as BMW 1602 or Alfa Romeo Giulia competitors but a sober car for sober people. The caricature in the advertisement is not far from many peoples’ perceptions, despite the motorsport activity and Dolomite Sprint.
Do I need to introduce the Mini? By now, it was being sold as a separate brand, rather than as Austin or Morris, and all the brand engineered Wolseley and Riley variants had long gone, along with the Cooper. Instead, these variants had all been replaced by the Mini Clubman, seen in the advertisement, with the longer, square front.
My chosen car is a 1979 Mini 850, the entry level Mini and entry level BL product. 850 means 848cc, probably about 34bhp, four speed box and rubber cone suspension.
There’s little Alec Issigonis would not recognise here, apart from the wind-up windows.
Despite this, or perhaps because if it, the Mini was by now seen as a car in a class of one, unashamedly smaller than anything identified as a potential competitor. Sales were on price, running costs, familiarity and ease of parking.
This example has just 11,900 miles on it, of which 11,500 were completed before 1995. Two owners from new, bidding currently at £5800.00.
And now, one of the highlights of the advertisement, and of my shopping. A Jaguar XJ6 series 2. At the risk of being controversial, there’s a strong argument that in 1977 this was the best saloon in the world, with an unmatched combination of visual elegance, refinement, comfort and driving pleasure that only Jaguar seemed able to combine with value for money.
The car I found is perhaps the best example in my selection – a 1975 XJ6 series 2 4. 2 litre long wheelbase saloon, with the rarely fitted four speed manual transmission. It’s another of those low mileage cars that always attract when we go shopping – just 9700 miles in 45 years with a certified number of exposures to rain of one.
Seen side on, the elegance of the car is a little lost on the long wheelbase version – 113 in against 109 in – with that elongated rear door. Space in the rear was now, if not generous, at least better than adequate.
But the combination of Jaguar factors is enough to tip the scales, and this car could legitimately claim to be the best saloon in the world in 1975. Yours for just £25000.00.
The next car is an unusual choice for advertising on television, and indeed you’d be very unlikely to see one in a showroom without an appointment.
The Daimler DS420, commonly referred to as the Daimler Limousine, was a staple of the wedding hire, funeral director and mayoral markets from 1968 to the present day, as well as providing service to royal families across Europe, Scandinavia, the Middle East, the Gulf states and south Asia, and was apparently the most popular car ever for reigning monarchs.
British Consuls, High Commissioners and Ambassadors were another big market, as well as top class hotels.
It was based on the Jaguar 420G, recently seen on CC, and production ran from 1968 to 1992, when the last one came out of Jaguar’s Coventry home at Brown’s Lane. Power came for the same 4.2 litre engine as “my” XJ6, linked to an automatic transmission.
And despite the success and market dominant position, only 5000 cars and chassis (for hearses) were built in 25 years. So, quite a surprise to see it advertised during Charlie’s Angels.
Next is another Marmite car – the love it or hate looks of the Princess. This is Leyland being confusing again. When first introduced, the car was sold as the Austin and Morris 1800 or 2200, or the Wolseley which had only the six cylinder 2200 option.
Within months, Leyland had rebranded the cars as Princess (with no marque, in the same way as Mini). For whatever reason, many referred to them as the Austin Princess, and if you say Austin Princess now most people will assume you mean these cars.
Technically, these cars were essentially a reskin of the Austin-Morris 1800 and 2200, the Landcrab. The engine was still the B series 1800 four cylinder or E series 2200 six cylinder, placed on top of a four speed gearbox or three speed automatic, and the suspension was the Hydragas system used on the Allegro.
The styling was polarising – personally, I like it, especially in strong brighter colours with the black vinyl rear quarter panels. Size wise, it was between the Ford Cortina and Ford Granada, and more spacious and comfortable than either, albeit pretty slow, and sadly quickly got a BL quality reputation. Still any appealing car, for its difference, broadly competent dynamics and comfort, and let down only by the lack of an obvious hatchback.
The feature car is a 1979 2200HL series 2 with automatic transmission. Series 2 was based around the new O series 1.7 and 2.0 litre four cylinder OHC engines, though the 2200 six cylinder continued pretty much unchanged. It has been subject to a renovation and respray in a Toyota white for some reason. Yours for a smidge under £6000.00.
And, sadly, now something we must do, look at a Morris Marina. The example car is a 1976 1.8 Coupe in Special trim. The Marina was a parts bin stop gap special, brought to the market in 1971 to fill the glaring gap in BL’s range where the Ford Cortina sat. To get to the market quickly, some major chunks of Morris Minor (the 1948 Issigonis car) were used, including the front suspension and steering, along with a Triumph gearbox, the A and B series 1.3 and 1. 8 litre engines that powered everything BMC from the Minor to the MGB and Austin Maestro, clad in a body prepared by Roy Haynes, poached from Ford UK after he’d finished the Cortina Mk 2.
The result was as good (or as disappointing) as you’d expect based on the ingredients. Arguably, this was the most inadequate new car BL offered, although it did achieve a large proportion of its early commercial targets. In the early 1970s, UK sales were pretty good, regularly holding the third best seller slot, and was BL’s best UK seller and second most produced car, behind the Mini.
On road performance was pretty awful – little grip, masterclass levels of understeer, poor ride and undistinguished engines. The car came as a four door saloon, an estate and as here a two door, badged as a Coupe. It used the same doors as the saloon and estate and thus had a slightly odd profile and cramped access to the rear seats. The interior was a pretty unappealing place, that got worse as Ford showed us what showroom interior appeal really was.
Life was tough enough against the Hillman Avenger and Vauxhall Viva; it didn’t see which way the 1976 Vauxhall Cavalier or Cortina Mk4 went, not that BL could have afforded to do anything about them.
It lived on to 1983, as the facelifted Morris Ital saloon at a bargain price. This example is not presented as anything it isn’t, and to be fair to it, it has done 540,000 miles. Still not tempted.
And now for something to cheer us all up. A Rover 2600 from 1980, and six cylinder engine apart, pretty much the same as the Rover 3500 V8 that is the focus of showroom scene in the advertisement.
We’ve seen the 3500 (SD1) a couple times on CC; this is the six cylinder version introduced in 1977, using an OHC conversion of the old Triumph straight six cylinder used in the 2000 and 2500, and TR5/TR6.
Aside from the styling, there was little actually innovative about the SD1. MacPherson struts, a live rear axle, and rear drive were pretty cautious in 1975. A hatchback was not in that part of the market, and an interior with no wood or leather was not in a Rover, until you remembered the early P6 saloons.
This example has been re-imported from France, and after 65000km (40000 miles) it’s back home and looking good, in one of the launch colours.
The advertisement reports that a lot of money has been spent at Rimmer Brothers (the go-to guys for SD1 spares). An SD1 in this condition and standard of preparation, and an interesting back story for £6000.00? You saw it here.
So, there you are, a quick tour round the BL showroom of 1977, and some contemporary temptations.
It’s interesting to note what is not in the TV advertisement – no mention of Land Rover or Range Rover, only film of the TR7 and Austin Maxi, but there is a bit of XJ-S to get your attention at the beginning.
This advertisement presumably worked, as Leyland Cars did something not dissimilar a couple years later, hung around British eccentricities. Never met those myself, of course, and I wouldn’t be able to write it up as I know nothing of shotgun. Or hats.
And the flying plughole of despair? Still miss it.
I have the deepest admiration for the British motor industry.
In the early sixties they had all the trumpcards in their hands : Mini, Austin1100 (America and Glider in some markets), MGB GT Jaaaag, Triumph umph umph and assembly plants in Spain (Authi) and Italy (Innocenti) and some 10 years later all was gone and we were stuck with the Allegro or even worse the Marina !
When the Leyland Princess was finally turned into a reliable car when the 2 liter 4 cylinder ‘ O’ series engine was introduced, you could not even give away a Princess.
Years later a proud Englishman told me that the British made Nissan Primera was better then the car made in Japan, I could not help but asking him what the hell were you English doing when you still had your own motor industry ?
Due to lack of investment and bad management everyone lost motivation which resulted in outdated and poorly assembled cars. I had a last year of production Spitfire 1500 which rusted and fell apart at only 60 000 miles. A mid 50s design still for sale in 1980!. Jags and the TR were great modern cars if they were assembled properly. Till this day, the Great British public blame the work force for the company’s demise but the hard truth is it’s down to stupid management decisions and internal competition between brands. Love a Staaaag,mind.
One wonders how the Marina survived the climate agenda scrappage scheme that destroyed thousands of beautiful classics.
Were I to pick one of these cars, I suppose it would be the Daimler DS420. It wouldn’t see much use, but it would be just the thing on those rare days when I need an airport pickup. And just think how easily my driver could hop out to open my curbside door!
Climate agenda – not really. The UK scrappage scheme happened in 2010, long before that became the hot topic it is today – please excuse the pun.
It was blatantly obvious back then it was simply a scheme to boost new car sales. Obviously, a lot of people couldn’t be bothered doing their due diligence into the value of their car, rare or not. Nobody was forced to scrap their car. If a new bottom-barrel Citroën C1 seems like a good trade for your Peugeot 205 GTi, that could have fetched more had you bothered to find out, well, nothing left to be done. The result is the horrifying sight of that video.
Today, the German carmakers are calling for another scrappage scheme for the same reasons. It shows they haven’t learned anything from the sharp drop in demand back then, nor from the continuously falling demand that’s been happening even in the supposedly strong economy, during which the carmakers offered scrappage premiums themselves. Rough times ahead.
No. It was. Back in 2005. Great plan by The Exchequer Gordon Brown to replace older cars with cleaner ones. Owners took their £2000 scrappage fee and spent it on low line Korean models. Every other drive had a new 05 plate Kia or Huyundi. Rover had just gone bankrupt. Dad.
I learned of the Dolomite through CC years ago, and it’s origins really intrigued me. Perhaps that’s what put people off, being the same old styling, but I personally am quite fond of it. The Neue klasse styling had just as long of a run (62-77 vs 65-81), and the only detail I find less appealing on the Triumpth design compared to the BMW is the back roofline. Obviously I’ve never driven one so I don’t know if the talk of performance being comparable is true or embellished by enthusiasts, but it does have some good ingredients, so I’d like to believe it
I don’t know why the Princess styling is so polarizing, I find it quite attractive if not for the vinyl top. It looks much better to my eye than the Allegro, lightyears less weird than the landcrabs(although I have a soft spot for those too), and I think it’s about as good as a lot of Italian designs of the time. The name is the real head scratcher, maybe it’s my American lack of reverence for royalty(I wouldn’t be comfortable driving a prince either) but princess definitely seems like a car name teenagers would point at you and snicker.
The Daimler, man. I am shameless in my love for the 420g, its the pinnacle of Jaguar saloons to me, to the extent that the also beautiful XJs look like compromised imitators of it by comparison. But the Daimler based on it, no thanks. Bustleback, bolt upright slab bodysides and greenhouse, and that pig nose of a grille just doesn’t do it for me, even with that great interior, but I never found Bentleys or Rolls Royces aesthetically appealing either, so maybe it’s just a taste one acquires with wealth. I never knew it lasted for that long of a run, but makes sense since they’re seemingly more common than the Jag they were based on.
A family friend had a Dolomite sprint in the late seventies, in poop brown of course. I thought it was a good-looking car, and was told that it was a nicely quick car, that had problematic handling. It had a little dash of glamour to it, in my eyes, which surely makes it unique for a BL product.
Always liked the Dolomite and saw a comparisn test with the BMW 2002 on youtube in some areas the Dolly came out better, styling is generic Michelotti/Triumph.
Not one single product of British Leyland could compete with zee Germans.
I’d say that in 1977 the Range Rover was a better SUV than you could buy from a German brand.
I had a 1977 MB W123 /250. Please don’t tell me that. Or don’t ask any taxi driver in Africa about the difference.
I had a lot of 50s and 60s British sport cars in the 70s and 80s. Germany’s MB and Porsche were about the twice the cost and not as much fun.
Somebody fucked with the time machine. Not where I’d set my flux capacitor equipped Delorean to.
In all seriousness I’d love a sorted out SD1. Such a stunner.
The blue Allegro has a “classic car” ZV registration, which means it was over 30 years old when it was imported into Ireland – from the UK presumably.
Odd that the MGB has modified wheels, seats, steering wheel, but still has the plastic bumpers – these are the first things I would change.
And then there’s the “Dolly”, the Triumph Dolomite ( an old Triumph name they recycled). When the 16 valve Dolly Sprint was in gestation it was meant to be a lightweight 2-door racer – the decision to change it to a “luxury” 4-door allegedly drove some members of the BL team to resign !
The Zorro-mask bumpers of the late B’s have done that trick of softening over time for me. Once hated, I now don’t mind them, and would keep them, though obviously preferring the chrome. I’d fit those later BL alloys, though, fits the plastic look better. Oh, and I’d lower it, ofcourse.
Yes, lowered of course.
Interesting shopping list, apart from the Daimler examples of the others are all on trademe auction site quite regularly, even the Triumph 2500 S was still being assembled here in 79 the last place in the world to do so using leftover CKD kits from OZ, I love the ad featuring the SD1 locking at the press of a switch except the rear hatch where the lock was guarenteed to fail replacements were $500 not fitted, Are Rimmers getting genuine SD1 spares from NZ? the last supplies on the planet were in the warehouses here and went to a specialist wrecking yard by the truckload, Rover City in Auckland were getting parts from that wrecker for quite some time to keep local cars going especially panel spares for accident repairs,
I’d take the Dolomite they were a good driving car in their day with very good roadholding.
Rimmer Bros got a lot f panels and some items from India, after the Standard 2000 episode
If allowed my freedom I’d walk. Not a place or time I would choose to be quarantined in. Leyland? Hmm, maybe. 1977? Good year, some great music. Put the two together though, and I’d be hammering at the door to be let out.
Second thoughts. I’d go out the back and see if I could find a Triumph 2500TC – there’s a 1977 leyland product I could live with.
I was thinking the same thing. I watched Hubnut take one for a spin recently (YouTube) – smooth six and a very nice place to be
About ten years ago a friend was selling one that had been in the family since new. Gave me first refusal. Should have bought it…
THe sheer numbers of surviving 2000s and 2500s here say they werent bad cars only the PI was unreliable the rest pretty much bullet proof once you swapped in Datsun axle universals.
This reminds me so much of the Top Gear’s fitting send off they give to every Morris Marina they can get their hands on: dropping a piano on it. Or the episode where they each bought a BL car from the 70’s: Jeremy a Rover 3500 V8, Richard a Dolomite, and James of course with a Princess.
Who would name a car a Princess anyway?? You would loose easily 1/3 of potential buyers just because of the name! Who’s the middle class male walking out of a 70’s dealership saying “I’ve just bought this lovely Princess”? Imagine if Jaguar had taken the E Type, easily one of the most beautiful and iconic cars ever made, and named it Princess. Just an awful name for a car unless it’s pink, plastic, and made by Mattel for the world of Barbie.
I don’t think it was such a bad name, Eric, with two qualifiers – for Britain, and in the seventies. Outside Britain, maybe not. And from what I recall Barbie had only been around ten years or so then, so there wasn’t that connotation.
Barbie wasn’t sold in the UK until the 1970s. Prior to the 18-22 range being renamed the use of ‘Princess’ previously had been in association with the Vanden Plas name, so having it on a car wasn’t unusual.
The first Austin Princess dates back to 1947.
When I first heard of the Princess, which probably was from that Top Gear episode, I thought the name was either derogatory or slang for what it really was, or a special edition like a “Bostonian” Cougar.
It reminds me of the Simpsons episode where Homer unknowingly bought a “f-series” Canyonaro, where the lighter was a lipstick dispenser.
I don’t know… I’m with Pete on this one. To me, Princess is a quintessentially British car name – a term of affection and respect like a ship’s name. And the Royal Navy had named lots of vessels after princesses, though I think that the only significant ship in the 20th century was WWI-era HMS Princess Royal. But anyway, I kind of like it; however here in the US it definitely wouldn’t fly. We get cars named things like Gladiator here instead.
Austin Princess would have been a great name for a professional wrestler.
To be honest, I found the piano-dropping Marina joke got tired quickly. And it crossed into outright bullying when they started buying up nicely restored examples to trash. Even Marinas can ignite enthusiasm in some, no matter how objectively inadequate they were.
Here’s the story of one of the trashed Marinas ending up being restored: https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1115118_car-on-which-jeremy-clarkson-dropped-a-piano-is-for-sale-mid-restoration-its-a-morris-marina.
I’m so damned old – I’ve driven 6 of these cars at one time or another and I rode in one of those Daimlers to a funeral
The first car I travelled in as a newborn in 1977 was an Austin Maxi. My father once said that was a mistake and he should have bought a Ford Cortina … which is what replaced it. For reasons not obvious to me, my parents returned to the plughole and bought a used Allegro as a second car instead of something Japanese.
Love the way Hubnit calls it ‘the plughole of despair’.
Oh dear, so I’m not the only incurable dag watching him, then? He amuses me, and I like his kid-like excitement at driving something as wretched as, say, a Marina, as well as his very dry humour about it all.
Not sure if the Plugole of Despair is uniquely his, but it is goodie.
I want a Marina. White, manual transmission, and it can be delivered to my brother-in-law in Churchville, PA. He bought a new one back in the 70’s when he lived in Erie, PA and was dating my sister. We still tell stories about that one. The electrics were the most reliable part of the car.
For myself? TR7, preferably one with a five speed (build quality on the four speed cars made Vegas look good). And I’d love the loan of an Allegro, to really see if they’re as bad as they were reputed to be. Supposedly in the same class as a Marina, and I remember what a Marina was.
The ELECTRICS were the most reliable part?????
(Censored)
Oh dear.
A mate and I got his wife a Marina coupe at some bombs and rockets yard in Parramatta $450 drive away the damn thing ran reliably for 4 years that I know of O series engine and automatic, cheap to buy cheap on fuel reliable you couldnt go wrong as long as you didnt expect great performance and roadholding it had none of either.
My sister had a ’74 in ’83, and it too was cheap as could be.
Unlike your mate’s, however, it enacted literally every cliché of BL badness ever invented – including some that people say are ACTUALLY invented!
Hmmm. Granddad had an Allegro in hearing aid beige. Uncle John the headmaster had a purple Marina. I’ve ridden in both but don’t have any memory of either.
So for me it’d have to be the XJ6(begrudgingly)L or the Rover SD1 with the junior engine. I’d take an Alfa over the MG, really not sure what to make of the Princess, the Mini is just too mini, and I don’t think my cargo shorts would be welcome in a Daimler.
Many North American gearheads of a certain age know the Dolly Sprint from an older Top Gear episode as Eric mentioned above.
A nice selection you have found here though and surprising (to me) that you were able to find all the cars from the ad, impressive!
Jim – Roger has plenty of time for this – he doesn’t get out much at the best of times
Terrific piece — and I’m still laughing about the Leyland ad.
Of these, of course, I’d like to assume the role ambassador and own a Daimler Limousine, though make mine an early 90s model, so I’d have the oddity of owning a car that looks as if it’s 30 years older than it really is.
The ad really is funny, mainly (to me) because it seems Pythonesque by the end when the sheer disorganised pile of brands seems intentionally over-extended for comic effect.
Anyway, why the hell so confusingly advertise everything at once, I mean, does the Daimler have fully reclining seats and a hatchback or what? And if so, what upper-crust snob would want to have their driver’s head squashing his family jewels whilst the luggage door let in the cold breezes? (Niche market that, surely. In fact, sounds like some toff fetishist’s Tinder ad, but I’m digressing)
I didn’t realize that the UK got the big-bumpered-B’s. I though that was the British paying us back for 1776. Seriously, 1977 was the year I graduated from college, and I don’t think I knew anyone who had a British car anymore. Just a few years earlier, I knew guys with MGB’s, Cortina’s, Spitfires and even Jags. Oh, I take that back; I did know one or two guys with Lotuses. At least there was some fun to go along with the usual woes.
It’s the Daimler for me. The Jag’s headroom (and other interior dimensions) is atrocious, unless you’re short. It really should have been called a coupe, like the Rover P5 4 door coupe. The Series 3 XJ’s were finally semi-doable in that regard.
Roger, this was a great post; perfect for a lazy early summer dinner on the deck. I suggest we do something similar with some other brands.
Sign me up for the Jaguar XJ6. My dream car would be the earlier 420G of which I’ve only had an opportunity to drool at from a pavement perspective; but I have been in the back seat of a friend’s Daimler Double Six. It was only six years old and riddled with rust already. Bombing down the North Circular in London in the late 70’s, I was gobsmacked that the only noise within the cabin was the analog clock ticking the seconds away on the dashboard.
The BL ad’s a classic, sounding almost like a parody as more and more unconnected brands pile up.
Harris Mann must one day be gonged for his contributions to some of the worst designs in British mass-production. He blames the awfulness of the Allegro on use of tall engines, but offers nothing for the singular hopelessness of the TR-7 or the dork-gawkiness of the Princess. It is clear that he was simply not very good. There had been a facelift proposal for the ADO16 prior to his involvement which is simply miles in front of this, and it may well have sold. The Allegro wasn’t a great car, and was badly built, but it failed largely because folk hated the looks.
I’m another fan of the Dolly, but it’d have to be the 16-valve Sprint, a seriously quick little car in the day. Ofcourse, in reality, it couldn’t be a Sprint because that same clever head blew head gaskets if so much as started (and then made repair of same a bugger of a job) so it’d be the standard one and I’d lose interest, really.
So the SD-1 it is, but it’d have be in this condition and with the V8. The idea of the OHC six has real appeal, but the performance penalty and minimally less use of fuel is finally stymied entirely by the reputation for top-end unreliability.
Really nicely done, Roger.
Man, if we could only go back to 1967! Hmmmmm, 1977, the year I was born. I think that I’d pick the Jaguar just because it looks so good (and your example, Roger, displays a really nice color), although the Mini is just about as cool as it always was. An earlier MGB would be great, but I’ve never been able to get used to the rubber-bumpered varieties. I like the Dolomite, but they’re rare in the U.S. – I’ve only seen one, a blue Sprint. Yep, I think I’ll take the Jag and cross my fingers that it’s a good one!
The 1977 range shows one of BL’s biggest problems: so many different cars and brands with very little of the engineering in common across the range.
What a fantastic collection of cars, each with their own quirks and issues, and nearly none of them had any parts in common. I find the basic Mini in that 70s colour very appealing, but if I have to choose I’d go for the Dolomite. Now I need to find the funds to keep it together.
Strangely I found 2 of them near here. They were never too common in mainland Europe, let alone more than 40 years later.
A fun question to consider. Part of me wants the Dolomite Sprint – it’s rare, it’s fun to drive and Dolomite has to be one of the coolest car names ever.
But in the end, if I am going to get a British car from the 70s, it needs to be the most quintessentially British car ever built – the Daimler!
Thing is, in the UK, this Daimler is most associated with the Queen Mum and funerals.
Got to be the XJ6 and the SD1 for me.
I am getting to the age where funeral attendance is going to become a common social activity – the Daimler sounds perfect to me. 🙂
Typically, I want what’s not there – a Vanden Plas 1750 auto in two tone!