(first posted here on 8/16/2013. Updated 4/9/2019) Not uncommonly, a brilliant career and an enduring reputation for innovation all derive from a single kernel of inspiration. Perhaps even a rather ordinary one, like say…a hollow tube. At a certain point in 1919, the Austrian designer Hans Ledwinka imagined how a hollow tube could radically transform the automobile from its horse-drawn wagon origins to a completely new architecture befitting its modern propulsion system. His breakthrough was realized at the Czech firm Tatra, and although that firm’s stunning dorsal-finned aerodynamic streamliners are most strongly associated with Ledwinka and Tatra, those were just the latest designer clothes artfully draped over his hollow tube.
There was a reason the automobile was commonly called the horseless carriage in its early days. That was the obvious starting point, and all of the engineering genius of those times was poured into making the mechanical components that propelled the carriages more effective and reliable. Although there were a few creative aberrations in the very earliest days, most of them clearly showed their carriage roots. The 1901 35HP Daimler “Mercedes” (above) designed by Wilhelm Maybach, set the pattern that was a natural progression from the carriage/wagon, that predominated the industry and still endures with trucks (and a very few cars): a steel frame, with an longitudinal engine in front, driving a rigid rear axle through a sliding-gear transmission and a drive shaft.
Whereas the 1901 Mercedes was a breakthrough in its own right, and the first “modern” automobile, its frame and rigid axles suspended by leaf springs were conceptional carry-overs from the horse-drawn era. Rather than this compromised mixture of the old and new, Ledwinka imagined something utterly new and elegant, a cohesive architecture befitting of a modern automobile. No one would ever call a Tatra a horseless carriage.
Take a good look at the picture above, because it was one of a very few truly revolutionary advances in the evolution of the automobile. Perhaps Ledwinka’s inspiration came from nature: its core was a strong central backbone, a hollow tube, if you will. At the front, the power plant (head?) and transmission were attached rigidly, made of aluminum, and were fully enclosed, a novelty in its own right. To minimize vibrations, the engine architecture was in the inherently most balanced form: a horizontally opposed boxer.
At the rear, the differential was rigidly attached (the hips). The individually suspended rear swing axles (legs) pivoted from the differential. It was light, rigid, smooth, efficient, and all encased in a neat and tidy package, unlike the exposed universal joints, gears, valve trains and drive chains of the time. And the front suspension is attached directly to the engine, itself a structural member. (Note: the swing axle was first designed and patented by Edmund Rumpler in 1903)
Ledwinka envisioned his breakthrough while he was then employed at the Austrian firm Steyr, but they passed on building it. And perhaps the mammalian anatomy wasn’t actually his inspiration. But in 1921 he returned to Tatra, where his ideas were realized: the legendary Tatra Type 11.
The T-11 had a light air-cooled boxer OHV twin engine at the front; a later T-12 variant had a boxer four. Further developments of this very successful configuration were built through 1948. It was a remarkably light, agile and efficient design, and shares honors with the 1922 Lancia Lambda in ushering in many of the basic principles of modern small-car design (the Lancia pioneered the the monocoque structure and independent front suspension). Although Ledwinka’s central tubular chassis/torque tube configuration has long been eclipsed by unibody FWD in modern small car design, it lives on in the remarkable off-road capable Tatra trucks employing the same principles today as well as in a host of cars over the years like the 1961-1963 Pontiac Tempest, the Porsche 928, and the current Corvette.
The next evolution in Ledwinka’s adventurous thinking on the subject of hollow tubes and small cars was to move the engine to the rear, keeping the central backbone frame, but now without a drive shaft. There were several advantages to this approach: the tunnel could now be smaller, drive line losses and engine noise was reduced, traction was improved, and a new independent front suspension didn’t have to fight for space with the engine.
Ledwinka’s son Erich and the brilliant designer Erich Überlacker worked on what became the Type V570 prototype of 1931 (above), which may have looked conventional on the outside, but was anything but. It was at this point too that Ledwinka moved on the next automotive frontier: aerodynamics.
Inspired by the pioneering Rumpler and Paul Jaray’s patented aerodynamic principles, the second V570 prototype of 1933 was transformed (with Jaray’s help) into what looks remarkably like a proto-Volkswagen. Well, even though Ferdinand Porsche admitted that he been looking over Ledwinka’s shoulder when he sat down to design his definitive Volkswagen concept of 1934, he was mostly interested in certain details of the Tatra boxer four, especially its forced air cooling system. Actually, Porsche and Ledwinka regularly exchanged ideas and the state of their current projects. They were both Austrians, and interested in similar directions of their work.
This chassis for Tatra’s never-built T97 might easily be mistaken for a VW chassis. Despite the exchange of ideas, Ledwinka was not happy when Porsche’s VW arrived in 1936, and sued for patent infringement, for the details of its forced air cooling. Tatra had been pioneering forced air-cooled engines since 1921 T-11, and had taken out patents on what covered many or most obvious approaches to that. Porsche was close to settling it, when Hitler told him he had a better solution that would manifest itself very soon. In 1939, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia, and the nasty business was deferred for some time. In 1961, VW finally ponied up 3 million DM to settle the matter. Contrary to common assumption, it did not cover the whole car, but just aspects of the VW’s air cooling system.
Hitler also put a stop to the production preparations for the V570 and T97, as he was not about to have the VW potentially upstaged, despite the fact that the T97 was going to be priced five times higher than the VW.
We’ve gotten a bit ahead of the time line, so let’s back up to 1933 again. Tatra had already decided to hold off on the V570, because the more conventional (T-11 derived) Type 57 was still selling well. Instead, the V570 architecture and aerodynamic principles were to be scaled up to a luxury car that would turn the world on its ears, the stunning Type 77, as well as the “mid-sized” 1.5 liter Type 97.
Utterly uncompromising in its approach to aerodynamics, the Type 77’s long flowing tail resulted in a Cd (coefficient of drag) of .212 (well below the Cd .26 of today’s Prius). Paul Jaray was hired to develop the 77’s aerodynamic body.
With its rear air-cooled OHC hemi-head V8 engine, back-bone chassis, all-independent suspension, a central driver’s position (on a few versions) and a central headlight that swiveled with the front wheels, the 77 (and its more pragmatic successor, the Type 87), inspired awe as well as imitation (Tucker Torpedo, among others).
Developed in great secrecy, the 77 was finally unveiled at the 1934 Prague and Paris motorshows. Despite its modest power output, the Type 77 was able to cruise comfortably at speeds of 140-150 kmh (85-90 mph), a remarkable achievement at the time. The press raved:
“It is sensation when it comes to its construction, to its appearance and to its performance. However, it isn’t a sensation that would just fall down from the skies, but a logical continuation of the road, which Hans Ledwinka took thirteen years ago. The ideological principle of the new Tatra is an understanding, that the car is moving at the divining line between the ground and the air. … The car maintained 145km/h, it has astonishing handling, it drives through the curves with speeds that are both mad and safe, and it seems, that it is only floating on whatever road. … It is a car, which opens new perspectives to the car construction and automotive practice.”
Vilém Heinz, Motor Journal, 1934 [10]
Despite the accolades, the Type 77 was only built in very limited numbers, some 250 total, in two series, through 1938. They were essentially coach built, and there were numerous small variations and running changes. Ultimately, its tricky handling and certain other limitations led to a substantially changed successor, the Type 87.
The definitive Tatra streamliner, the Type 87 was lighter, more powerful, had better weight distribution, and was produced in larger numbers (some 3,056 from 1936 – 1950). And its rear V8 and swing axles still led to potentially lethal handling at the limit, which was now over 160 kmh (approx. 100 mph).
Hitler, a major auto buff, is seen here admiring the very advanced alloy SOHC 3.4 L V8 Type 77 power plant at the Berlin Motor Show in 1934, initially loved the 77/87, and is said to have told Porsche: “That is the car for my highways!” And unlike the very Volkswagenesque T97, the 87 was kept in production after the Nazis took control of the Tatra factory.
Thanks to its ability to cruise effortlessly over 90mph with only 75hp on Germany’s new autobahns, the 87 became the favorite car of high-ranking Nazi officers. It was dubbed the “Autobahnmobil.” More ominously, the T87 was also soon dubbed “the Czech secret weapon” after many of these high-speed demons died at the hands of the wickedly-abrupt “terminal” oversteer of the tail-heavy V8. Hitler reputedly had a change of heart and banned his top Luftwaffen officers from T87 seat time to forestall the recurring carnage.
After the war, the communist-era planned economy presented serious challenges to Tatra. The T87 was made for a few years, but the post-war economy was too austere for V8s.
So a smaller T97 design was resurrected and updated. The resulting four-cylinder T600 Tatraplan (above) was exported to the west in modest numbers (including the object of my childhood obsession) during the early fifties. Two small windows were a rare concession to rear visibility. But then the 77 and 87 had no real use for rear windows, seeing that there were very few cars that could outrun it on the autobahn.
But Tatra was never equipped for efficient mass production. After a few years, the communist party apparatchiks instructed Tatra to change gears again; forget about mass market cars, which had now been given to Skoda, and design a luxury vehicle suitable for their own use. The dorsal fin now gave way to (two) rear windows, and the rest of the car was substantially restyled and updated for the fifties, if in a decidedly eccentric Czech idiom. The resulting and now highly collectable T603 was built from 1955 through 1975. (603 CC here)
Tatra T603’s have found their way into the movies, including a star turn as a sinister sedan in “Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events.” The very capable and multi-talented T603 was also the star of a highly camp communist-era promotional infomercial. The T603 shows off its hooning prowess, eluding the police with lots of tail-out oversteers and a daring sideways roll down a steep meadow (Youtube: Tatra T603 Happy Journeys Part 1 & Part 2“). A superbly spent half hour.
The evergreen T603 continues to inspire new generations. It recently had a new role, as the host for new interior concepts by industry supplier Faurecia. Sadly, its drive train was sacrificed to show off some new trunk technology.
By the mid seventies, the aero-look was passé. The 1974 T613 successor sported sharp-edged styling by Vignale of Italy. But Ledwinka’s basic formula stayed fully intact, right through 1996. It was the upscale, high performance corollary to the similarly boxy rear-engine VW 411; a 411 Panamera if you please. After the fall of Communism, once again mostly futile efforts were made to sell the T613 in the west as a BMW competitor.
More recent efforts to revive the boxy T613, like this T700, have failed. But with the new-found emphasis on efficiency and aerodynamics, perhaps it’s time to dust off those old body dies of the T77. With an EV drive train under that dorsal fin, it could be just the ticket back to the future.
More details on the relationship of Ledwinka/Tatra and Porsche/VW:
Automotive History & Mystery: Who’s The Real Father Of The Volkswagen? Hunting For Its DNA Back To 1903
The performance of those Tatras was crazy for the time.
Only a few contemporary cars from the USA (supercharged Duesenbergs and Auburns, maybe the straight-8 Buick Century of the late 1930s) could keep pace with the V8 Tatras.
Thanks for this really good coverage of Tatra and Ledwinka history – both favorites of mine.
Happy to have found this new site.
Allen
Thanks for the article and information on this vehicle line..
This was a good read. I enjoyed learning about a car that I’d never heard of before.
It’s a very interesting looking vehicle too.
There is a ‘Tatra garage’ on Glendale Bl. before the rt. 2 fwy. in LA sometimes the door is open and you see some late model Tatra’s and even one of the ones with the fin on the back.
Quite informative…with facts and photo’s that wasn’t previously known.
You may find it of interest that TATRA happens to be the most favorite thread in this vintage race forum: http://www.vintageracerules.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1514&page=all
We rented that Lemony Snickett movie, and aside from the car, we couldn’t stand to watch it. We ended the movie about 2/3 through and returned it. Lousy.
The car? I would LOVE to be able to see one of these up close and personal!
Different tastes: I loved it, but then I tend to like Carrey: over the top.
It’s interesting that the three cars in that movie were the Tatra, an equally-sinister black ’60s Imperial, and….a beige Taurus.
I’m seeing that the choices of cars chosen for movies has been on an upswing, generally. Now that’s a job I’d like to have had: picking cars for movies….I would really like that.
Wow, thanks — these kinds of articles are right up my alley. I love learning more about the old streamlined cars of the 30s. I think the T87 and T97 are my favorites of those shown. Would love to see some of these in person someday…
Bad luck for Tatra, going from one flavor of statist totalitarianism to another.
The Type 77’s low Cd, given the presumably cruder aero analysis tools available at the time, sounds incredible to me. Or maybe the Tatra’s underside, with the nice flat pan made possible by its “Austrian School” rear-engined layout (like that of the VW Käfer), gives it the edge over modern cars. People forget that a car’s underside is just as liable to drag as its body.
The Cd is unitless; I think the actual drag, at a given speed, is the product of that & the cross-sectional area.
There is some controversy over the 77’s Cd, and different numbers have been tossed about. Some say that 0.212 was from a 1:5 scale model.
Most likely, it was higher than that, especially in street-ready condition. But two things to keep in mind: it’s relatively much easier to get a low Cd in a large and long vehicle, and very difficult to do so in a small and/or short vehicle. Also, the 77’s long tail was very effective aerodynamically, and a long tail is unbeatable. But it’s also very impractical, for obvious reasons.
In any case, the 77 undoubtedly had a very low Cd. And yes, the total aerodynamic drag also depends on the frontal area, and drag area is the product of the Cd and frontal Area (A): CdA
Tatras are amazing cars, and if I were a top ranking party official in the 60s, I would be the first in line for one of these- forsaking the Zil and whatever else I could have been allocated. I love watching Happy Journey, and so lust after one of these, and it made me think that this is what the Porsche Panamera should have been. I’ve seen one in the flesh, and the build quality was amazing. Apparently, these were rebuilt regularly on the factory line ala Bristol to be new cars every 10 years, so you can get a 1965 car that was ‘as new’ as late as the 80s. The early ones didn’t rust nearly as bad as the much uglier boxy version, no doubt due to the poor steel used everywhere in Europe in the mid-70s, as well as general cheapening of the product. Say what you will about planned economies, but they seemed to be as good at decontenting as their western counterparts. The Wartburg 311-353 transition is an equally good example.
If you’re ever on the west coast of Florida, the Tampa Bay Auto Museum in Pinellas Park has six Tatras in its collection. The proprietor/collector has three obsessions: The 18th century Cugnot steam carriage (he built a replica); early-front wheel drive cars (including Cords, Citroens, Tractas, a DWK and a Ruxton); and early rear-engined cards like the Tatras and rear-engined Mercedes cars of the 30s.
http://www.tbauto.org/
Long time fan of the beetle. Guess you can hardly like the type 1 without having a large amount of respect for the Tatra.
Thanks Paul
Most post-war |European cars were basedon Ledwinka’s ideas, or at least borrowed parts of him :
– The 1948 Renault 4CV had the same configuration, only with a water cooled 4 cylinder engine
– The Citroën 2 CV, borrowed the idea of a two cylinder air cooled boxer engine.
– Fiat 500 engine in the back, 2 cylinder air cooled.
Of course, Citroën being ap ioneer in FWD could not come up with a rear engined car, but the 2Cv set the standards for the lay out of most modern cars.
I would suggest that modern cars owe their layout to BMC for the transverse-engined Mini, and to Fiat, who realised the gearbox should be on the end of the engine rather than underneath.
Wouldn’t put the 2CV in that category. The original 2CV, which never came out due to the war, had a water-cooled flat-twin. This was changed to air-cooled after additional testing in the 40s. Ditto the Panhard flat-twin, which was not linked to the Citroen engine and came out after the war a bit before the 2CV: Panhard were just looking for the FWD economy car they knew they could sell after the war. They tested J-A Gregoire’s AFG prototype and just added two doors. Ledwinka’s influence is nowhere to be seen in those cars, IMHO. The 4CV, on the other hand, was Louis Renault’s version of the KdF, so it does have Tatra genes, as do all subsequent rear-engine Renaults and Alpines.
Interesting that these cars started as contemporaries to the Chrysler/DeSoto Airflow (though these were undoubtedly even more aerodynamic).
I’ve seen Tatra cars both on the streets (newer ones, in Prague) and older ones in a museum (now defunct, the owner collected lots of “Riley” cars, which happened to be his name, but also had a couple Tatras from the 40’s). I appreciate their engineering, but think their appearance must be an acquired taste, they are so unconventional, but I think their styling takes a back seat to their function, which is probably as it should be.
I think Tatra also still makes trucks.
Not sure if they are named after the Mountain range, but I think of the Tatra mountains as being between Poland and Slovakia, rather than Czech republic…but I guess the vehicle postdates the formation of Czechoslovakia and predates the separation of the two countries twenty years ago (so the Tatra mountains certainly were in Czechoslovakia, if not in the Czech republic).
In czech/slovak the mountains are named Tatry – just Tatry (you dont say mountains, you say Tatry and everybody knows u mean mountains, saying it would sounds ridiculous)), it could mean also plural like bunch of tatras, or it could mean something else… (I am from czech r. – and it is my guess). Truth is Tatra co. is close to Tatry))
The “Happy Journeys” video is great – riding around the countryside with the Czech Audrey Hepburn, to a swingin’ soundtrack, in an awesome two-tone car…
what is the police van?
it’s a one-off 201 van, apparently… amazing what happens when you type ‘Tatra police’ into Google images!!
About 20 years ago, I had just become the proud owner of a Citroen DS20. I was posing around London and pulled into the parking lot of the local supermarket when I noticed that nobody was watching me… because right behind was a Tatra 603. Damn – the only car which can make a DS look ordinary.
Impressive cars. It’s too bad Tatra ended up on the wrong side of the wall during the Cold War. I can see the T603 and later cars being sold for North American drivers. It would’ve made a good contender for the Porsche and possibly the Corvair, with its rear-engined, air-cooled design.
Well, it’s hypothetic, but quite probable I’d say that if Tatra would have ended up on the correct side of the Iron Curtain, you’d have never heard of Porsche. Probably Audi’s production would have been significantly reduced as well. Here’s a recent concept of Tatra T8 (notice the parallel naming with Audi A8) as it appeared few years ago, though I think was dropped, https://www.behance.net/gallery/900145/Tatra-T8-concept .
An article on some strange Tatra rumours in British Columbia, together with a number of recent pictures of a surviving T87.
http://driving.ca/auto-news/news/the-fascinating-world-of-canadas-lost-tatra-culture
Paul,
Please do a thing on cars from movies.
Thanks.
I was parked next to a tatra 603 in Austria in 1982, and waited till owner returned to hear the sound of that v8. never forgotten. if I ever have money dough full I would go and find a tatra I drive a b3 Passat which looks like a another pinched design by Germans from tatra, I love there early front engine twins and the same design diff from then, is still used in there trucks of 2017 they made 3959 trucks in 2016 thanks.
Being of Czech decent I find these cars fascinating. Wonderful that such a small country would have a fledging auto industry, with these along with the Skoda. Thanks for bringing us their story.
Vacationing in Europe a few years ago I never saw a Tatra, but was surprised to see Skodas everywhere.
Great piece, as always… The 87, DS, Airflow, Tucker all deserve to be in the same conversation about success, failure, and survival of a marque that has little to do with the design/engineering effort. The designers/engineers do their best, and success is only half chance….
There are plenty of weak designs that succeed too – mustang II, pinto, chevette, ’60 Plymouth, MINI redesign, etc…
Surely, I thought, considering the length of time and the incredible varieties of VW customization, somebody, SOMEBODY thought to do a Tatra Type 77 tribute with a Beetle, some aluminum cladding and a tailfin. But, alas, no. The only result I found today with Google was a ’57 Chevy tribute that amused me with the tackiness and weirdness. Why the third fin? Was someone enamored of the Lockheed Constellation?
Lots of people have put homemade boatails on the asses of Metros and 1st gen Honda Insights and they’ve made claims of substantial improvement in highway MPG. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=21&v=1sQFtd-bTfw
I miss technically different cars but I would not buy a technically radical car, so ergo, we don’t have many anymore. The Tatra is just so deliciously absurd: an air cooled V-8 slung out behind swing axles. On tires about 10 cm wide. What could possible go wrong here?
They must have known how inherently dangerous this design was which certainly explains why there have not been other rear-engine V-8 cars.
I miss cars like the DS-21 and the Tatra but I also love the comfort and convenient of a modern car, too.
The Tatra 77. The first car I would buy if I ever hit the Powerball lottery!
Great new pics of that 77, Paul. Made my day!
They’re the ones I took at the Shape of Speed exhibit last summer:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/museum/museum-classics-the-shape-of-speed-a-sublime-collection-of-streamlined-cars/
Hans Ledwinka, or Jan Ledvinka, was born in what is Austria, however bore a Czech name meaning “small kidney” in Czech. Heck I have family living in Klosterneuburg and around there who are Moravians for generations and bear Czech names. Can you imagine a hardcore Austrian family deciding that a Czech name was more appropriate?
So it would be fitting if the people of Czech, Moravian and Slovak lands got some credit some of the time.
Throughout his life, from birth to deth, he was known as Hans, never as Jan. He was also a native German-speaker. Always considered himself as German-Austrian. However, you can take credit for other Tatra engineers, such as Julius Mackerle, Milos Klavik, Vladimir Ruzicka, etc.
Death, not deth. I thought that i corrected it in time…
from Hagerty. Sometimes man reaches for the stars when he should be happy at home.
Used to be a nice Tatra at the Czech Museum in Cedar Rapids..it’s probably still there. That was before their last big flood however . . .