(first posted 3/20/2011. Updated 1/5/2021) “Nailhead”: what did Buick do to deserve that less than flattering name for its legendary V8 engine from the mid-fifties to the mid sixties? “Hemi-head”; even “flathead” are much more lyrical. For those not familiar with Buick’s unusual valve arrangement, we’ll do a primer on that, as well as touch on its brief glory days on the drag strip. But for those already enlightened on the subject, I offer something more: the source and likely explanation of its unusual valve arrangement.
Buick came late to the OHV V8 game, Cadillac and Olds both having introduced their superb engines in 1949. Buick’s venerable straight eight from the thirties at least had overhead valves, unlike the previous Cadillac and Olds flathead engines. That allowed it to stay in the post war game a bit longer with higher compression and multiple carburation. But it was heavy, and not at all suitable for the horsepower war of the fifties that was quickly developing.
In 1953, Buick brought out their new V8, with a very large 4″ bore and quite short 3.2″ stroke, the most oversquare engine on the market at that time. It displaced 322 cubic inches (5.3 L), and came in 164 to 188 hp variants.
In 1954, a small-bore version with 264 CID (4.3 L) reserved for the low end Special arrived.
The new Buick V8 was relatively light and compact for its time, weighing some 625 lbs. It was built with high quality components, and quickly caught the eye of hot rodders, this being a few years before the Chevy small block came on the market. Its unusual head and valve arrangement made it a narrow engine, increasing its appeal to engine swappers, like this one replacing the six in an old Chevy. But it was precisely that narrow head that also presented serious challenges.
Here’s a nice cutaway of the Buick nailhead engine. What instantly stands out is the unusual arrangement of the valves and valve train, in that the valves hang vertically in a pent-head (or almost hemi-head) combustion chamber. We’ll discuss the origins of this later, but note how tortured the exhaust port is, for having to make an almost 180 degree bend right behind its valve.
For comparison sake, here’s a cross section of the Cadillac V8 that preceded the Buick by two years. The bigger valves have a mild angle in relation to the head, creating a wedge head combustion chamber, which would come to be near-universal in American ohv engines. The ports are bigger and smoother, especially the exhaust. Perhaps the most obvious thing about the Buick nailhead is that its arrangement demands very small valves, which seems antithetical to the whole concept of the modern V8 in the first place.
Small they were, hence the “nail head” moniker. The early engines had a 1.75″ intake and a 1.25″ exhaust valve, puny even for the mid fifties. Even the legendary Wildcat 401 and 425 cubic inch engines from the mid sixties had only a 1.875″ intake and a 1.5″ exhaust; both substantially smaller than the much smaller displacement Chevy V8 engine.
The explanation generally given is that Buick was focusing on torque rather than maximum breathing at high rpm. And the Buick engines delivered that in spades, typically with more than one (gross) ft. lb. per cubic inch, a very respectable output indeed. In the sixties, Buick labeled and advertised their engines on their torque output, not the horsepower, which can be confusing. This Wildcat 445 is a 401 from a 1966 Skylark GS with 325 hp.
In order to achieve these outputs, Buick had to use very aggressive camshafts. By opening the little valves early and very quickly, much of their limitations were overcome, up to a point. Already the first 322 nailhead had a camshaft that was the equivalent of a “race cam” at the time, one that would be typically installed from an aftermarket supplier. The intake duration was 282 degrees, and the exhaust 292 degrees, with a 67 degree overlap, along with very steep ramps for extra rapid valve opening.
The camshaft in the 401s and 425s were even more aggressive, and those engines were known for their lumpy idle. Not exactly the image Buick typically was trying to convey at the times, with a banker’s Electra 225.
Hot rodders found out early that the Buick’s breathing limitations could be overcome by creative solutions. Intake manifolds with every possible combination of carburetors known to man were fabricated.
Supercharging was an obvious route, by forcing more air through the small ports. Here’s an excellent reprint of a 1954 Hot Rod Magazine article detailing perhaps the first blown nailhead (above), with gobs of technical info on the then new Buick engine.
Hot rodders were drawn to the Buick nonetheless, at least for a few years before the Chevy V8 and Chrysler hemi established their supremacy. Undoubtedly the most creative and bizarre of all reversed the valve arrangement totally, using a front crank-driven blower to force air through the tiny tortured exhausts, allowing the larger and smooth intakes to now function as exhausts. Take a close look: unbelievable!
The biggest racing fan of the nailhead was TV Tommy Ivo, who started with one in his very successful rail, added a second, and eventually built this legendary quad-nailhead four wheel drive monster. Here’s more nailhead racing history. It’s important to point out that Ivo did not race competitively; he toured the country with his superbly finished machines and ran them in demonstration/show “races” against a local or other circuit racer, which he almost invariably “won”, given the vast superiority of his machines. Ivo retired from drag racing when it became seriously competitive.
The nailhead eventually grew to 425 cubic inches in 1963 for its final three years.It was rated at 340 (gross) hp with a single four barrel carb and at 360 hp with dual quads.
In 1967, a whole new Buick generation of V8s appeared, with a very conventional head indeed. I suspect that that the Buick’s pent head was notoriously dirty, and that Buick saw the writing on the wall in terms of the coming emission regulations. It’s a curious contrast to the Oldsmobile V8, whose combustion chamber was the exact opposite: it had a very shallow valve angle, and the basic Olds combustion head design survived as one of the last of its breed; in fact the Olds 307 was the last V8 to meet emission regs with a carburetor in 1990.
So now to my theory about the origins of the nailhead’s unusual design. In 1951, Harley Earl’s famous LeSabre concept appeared, with a radically advanced 3.5 liter (216 CID) aluminum V8 that ran on both gas and methanol. It was supercharged and was rated at 339 hp. Years ago, as a kid, I stumbled on a cross section of the LeSabre engine, and was struck by a certain specific similarity to the nailhead.
The little Buick engine had hemispherical/pent roofed heads, with its valves in the classic formation allowing for large valve diameters. If you look at the intakes on this, one can see that the nailhead used the same unusual arrangement, but for both its valves. The LeSabre/XP 300 engine’s exhaust push rods had a wild arrangement, and were designed to fit into the block between each cylinder.
It’s quite obvious from this first OHV engine by Buick that it had a strong interest in the hemi/pent roof head, and very likely that Buick considered that their new production engine would also be a genuine hemi, using the same basic configuration as the experimental 215. Given the impact Chrysler’s hemi (above) made in 1951, it’s highly logical and likely.
But almost certainly the expense of building it turned out to be prohibitive. Hence the “half-hemi” nailhead. Buick may also have been planning to offer a high-performance full hemi version of the new engine along with the nailhead, but decided against that.
High cost is precisely the reason Chrysler started offering a simpler and cheaper “poly” head, and dropped its hemis altogether after only seven years, and switched to a wedge shape combustion chamber in their new B-Series engines in 1958.
We’ll likely never know for sure, but the evidence certainly points to this scenario. In any case, it rather backed Buick into a corner, with little valves and a combustion chamber that in the longer run was not so ideal. Half a hemi.
The way to really look at the nailhead is this: it’s similar to a typical four-valve per cylinder pent-roof head of today, but with two of the four valves missing. That’s negating the whole advantage of the hemi/pent head: room for more and/or bigger valves. Buick took a curious half step, one that has left us scratching our heads, but also one that left an enduring legacy nevertheless.
Over the years I have read or watched several explanitions of the Nailhead engine and why it is called that. This is the first one that I understood. Now I know why it is different from other valve configurations. Nobody else showed a diagram. Thanks for the education.
Buick did a Jan. 1953 presentation about its new V8 at the national SAE meeting in Detroit—the published paper is 20 pages of text, illustrations, and charts laying out their “what they were thinking” goals and choices, especially noting everything gained in comparison to their straight-8. We learn that future styling considerations (low/sloping hoods, etc.) made a compact engine desirable, and actually that final production of the engine was delayed due to machine tool shortages (perhaps related to the Korean War restrictions on industry re materials and equipment). They take pride in a spark plug more centrally located than in any competing engine, and talk about the reasons that they’re satisfied with valve size (in combination with cam, intake/exhaust passages, etc.). Fascinating! (“The design also makes possible a common horizontal gasket surface for the rocker-arm cover and for the intake manifold, which simplifies machining, and, even more important, greatly reduces the sealing problem at these critical points.”) Paul, I’ll e-mail a copy to you momentarily; I’m a Ford guy, and so I’ve learned plenty from you here!
We learn that future styling considerations (low/sloping hoods, etc.) made a compact engine desirable
Sure, but as long as Buick was going to share Fisher bodies with Cadillac and Olds, that really wasn’t ever going to be a real factor.
There is no question that the Buick was commendably compact. One can see that by comparing the cross sections of the Buick and Cadillac V8s up in my post. It was decidedly more compact.
But given the trend in cars getting longer and wider, that was all for naught, eh? The Buick V8 looks positively lost in the engine compartment of any full sized Buick.
The Air Force used a Buick V8 to start the engines on the SR-71.
There are two Buick engines in the original start carts for the SR-71.
As far as the Buick drag engine with the exhaust routed out of the intake ports, Ford flathead V8’s were also modded like that. Gotta be a real diehard fan or marching to a different tune. Better engines available that put out more power for probably a lot less cost.
The SR-71 starter has been discussed and illustrated in prior posts.
I had the two 4-BBL version of this torque monsta Buick 425 cubic inch “Nailhead” V8 in my ’64 Riviera.
The huge chrome, dual snorkel chrome air cleaner and the finned aluminum valve covers were/still are a fine example of automotive beauty; just to open the hood and gaze at.
But driving it was even better!
The steady progression of: the AFB carb’s secondaries coming “online”, then the entire second 4-BBL carburetor opening up and then the downshift from third to second gear of the new-for-1964Turbohydramatic automatic transmission literally would take my breath away.
First time “Shotgun” riders would either be stunned into reverent silence or let our a rebel yell, using words that could not be repeated in polite conversation.
Of the five GM divisions, Buick seemed to be the one that was most successful in avoiding Deadly Sins (the 1986 Buick Riviera that looked way too much like the substantially cheaper Buick Somerset being an exception).
The nailhead V8 could be considered a big part of Buick’s success. Was it a great engine? Hardly. But, as pointed out in the article, it worked well in the vehicles for the demographic that bought Buicks. In fact, it could be said that the nailhead was the embodiment of the old industry adage “American auto consumers might talk horsepower, but they drive torque”.
Note: The caption of the photo of the engine swap identifies the recipient as a Chevy. It looks like a ’53-54 Pontiac to me.
I’m thinking early split windshield Olds 76 or 88 (smaller ‘Chevy’ body) with Buick grille (says ‘Buick’) and Olds wheelcovers to make a lighter weight ‘Buick’ ‘funny car’ for racing… maybe has a Hydramatic 4 speed automatic tranny… maybe a B&M Hydro version…
Excelente explicación y comentarios adicionales.
Yo tuve en la adolescencia un Buick Super Riviera Dynaflow 1958. Era un auto ya de 25 años y fue un excelente vehículo que me introdujo en el mundo de los autos antiguos.
Comparto con todos, los comentarios positivos hacia el motor Nailhead y a la transmisión.
El coche fue destruido por mecánicos incompetentes años después.
Considero que incluso ese vehículo pido haber sido más fino y confiable que un Rolls Royce de la época.
Translation of Daniel’s comment above:
Excellent explanation and additional comments.
I owned a 1958 Buick Super Riviera Dynaflow as a teenager. It was a 25-year-old car and it was an excellent vehicle that introduced me to the world of vintage cars.
I share with everyone, the positive comments towards the Nailhead engine and transmission.
The car was destroyed by incompetent mechanics years later.
I consider that even that vehicle I wish to have been finer and more reliable than a Rolls Royce of the time.
The valves of the 401 Buick at 1.875″ x 1.5″ aren’t much different than Chevy SBC ‘400’ (actually, also, 401″) of 1.94″ x 1.5″… First year, 1970, SBC 400 w/ 2 bbl. carb. and 9:1 rated 265 HP. (same HP as last 2 bbl. carb. BBC 396″/402″)… but much milder 194/202 durations cam (184/194 in trucks). Although the Buick valves were prolly much more shrouded by the chambers design/size. The stock cam durations used in Buick 401’s were prolly what we would call a 400 HP cam nowadays for a SBC…
Buick had a better valves layout in the old OHV straight 8. The ’38 Buick with 320″ straight 8, 3 speed manual, and little 2 door body was a bit of a ‘muscle car’. There’s one that shows up at our local cruise nights pumping 200+ HP now…
Besides the early 50’s Buick hemi, they also had a conventional 215″ aluminum V8 in 1951 concept cars… a Roadmaster… but haven’t seen the exact valve layout of it… maybe conventional, maybe a nailhead… on nailheads, looking from the front, the pushrods and valve stems actually cross as an X… instead of being parallel.. Buick may have been considering a 4 valves per cylinder (small valves not a problem) pentroof engine with forked rocker arms which I think was seen in some earlier WWII engines… maybe even earlier racing engines… I always assumed the ’61 – ’63 Buick/Olds 215’s had rocker arms instead of stud mounted rockers because of its ear;y 1950’s, maybe late 1940’s design history… I think the rocker arms are also aluminum… ALCOA was pushing automakers to make aluminum engines… even a few aluminum Chrysler Slant Sixes went into production…
I believe the Honda Silver Wing V2 motorcycle engines are pushrod 4 valves per cylinder. Since the cylinders stick out sidewise, they went center cam pushrod OHV because OHC would make the engine too wide/tall…
The new Chrysler Hemis also have nearly horizontal roller lifters but some get poor oiling to the needle bearings, they fail, and the lifter roller cuts a groove in the cam lobes by 100-150K miles, especially on valve deactivation versions… also, the Stellite valve seats fall out of the aluminum heads by that mileage destroying the engine, especially if the engine has ever overheated… the earlier all iron Magnum 360″/5.7L makes a more dependable, longer lasting truck engine, often showing little wear at 500,000 miles…
Child TV Tommy Ivo (and young Kurt Russell) can still be seen today in old westerns shown on TV old westerns channels.
My brother had a 63 Lesabre 4 door sedan with a 401 4bbbl. It had enough torque taking off in low to break the diff and put a hole in the case.
An interesting fact about nail valve engines was that the cam lobes were centered under the lifters. Most OHV engines had the cam lobes slightly offset from the lifter base to cause them to rotate a little each cycle to maintain an even wear pattern.
Chevy with ‘W’ engine (409), Ford with similar design, and Buick with nailhead all eventually realized they needed to go with conventional design as used by Pontiac, Olds, Chevy, and Cadillac to make good HP with good MPG while avoiding detonation…
Actually, with Buick’s adoption of the THM-400 three-speed automatic with a torque converter, The gobs-of-torque Nailhead was no longer necessary. The Dynaflow was essentially in high gear all the time, and the Nailhead could supply the massive torque that the Dynaflow required to get a heavy car moving.
What brought me here: the song “Nailhead” by The Kings of Nuthin’. Now I understand the song a lot better. I’m kind of MOPAR guy myself. My Roadrunner demands it.
The information I had seen in the past was the engine had to fit where the previous in-line engine went without having to do major body modifications underhood. I always found the Buick side hinged hoods to be interesting and nice for major work, unlatch both sides and lift it off.