(first posted 1/16/2015) When writing the post about the 1972 Chrysler by Chrysler the other week, I thought I should explain why there was a full-blown Brougham version of a Valiant. It was not easy to explain its different position in the market and how the car ended up very different as well in what ended up being just two short paragraphs, and in fact I realised that the Valiant background was about to take over the post and cut it short with the idea to do another post allowing for more detail.
Now before we start, I must confess that the ute above was not actually built by Chrysler Australia, the first Valiant was a four door sedan only here, I saw it at a car show five years ago. It was built using panels from a later-model ute.
Chrysler-Dodge-De Soto Distributors (Australia) Pty Ltd was formed in 1935, as a consortium of 18 independent importers to achieve a stronger operation than individual importers in each state. The company was taken over by the Chrysler Corporation in 1951, together with the body-building firm TJ Richards that had been building car bodies since 1913. Import tariffs meant that very few cars were imported fully built-up, rather it was usual to have local assembly from kits with local bodies – yes there were utes!
After the initial post-war seller’s market eased Chrysler struggled to compete with Ford and GM which both sold a range of American and British cars, for which Chrysler had no competition as the involvement with Simca did not occur until 1958. A important shift took place after 1948 when the Holden building towards taking over half of the entire market by the end of the fifties. The requirement to build cars locally exposed manufacturers who sold in small numbers, and an early effect was Chrysler carrying over the 1953-54 Plymouth, Dodge and De Sotos through 1955 and 1956 because there had not been sufficient return on tooling costs. Ford would do the same thing running the 1955-56 car for another two years, but the 1957 Chryslers would not see Australian production either.
Instead there was to be an Australian market-specific Chrysler model that was created by adapting 1956 Plymouth style front fenders, a wrap-around rear window and fins to the basic 1954 body. The Royal was a little smaller than other US cars by that stage, particularly in width, but much larger and heavier than a Holden. Although it was initially planned to be built as a Plymouth, Dodge and Chrysler, this fragmentation was soon recognised as folly and the car would be sold only as the Chrysler Royal from February 1957 with the model code AP1 (for Australian Production 1).
Initially the cars came only with the 230/250 flathead sixes, and a 313 V8 was soon added. With two updates (AP2 & AP3) at approximately two-year intervals mainly involving trim changes and the addition and then removal of ‘saddle’ fins the car would be built through to 1964. However only 13,600 cars were built in this time, split roughly equal between models (4,748/4,044/4,444 – note the AP3 production run was much longer, showing a ‘normal’ sales drop over a long model run). This included the Plainsman wagon, Wayfarer ute and also commercial chassis, and together with a relatively small number of full-size car sales it was obvious that something needed to be done.
Luckily for both Chrysler and Ford Australia, the new US compacts came along at just the right time to form effective competition for the Holden. In 1960 one of the new Valiants was brought out for evaluation, and of course it was a very competent vehicle so there is no need to introduce it again. The big issue to be faced was the six slanted towards the drivers side on what would have to be a right-hand drive car. The steering box would have to find a home together with the coil, distributor, fuel pump under the engine and the gear linkages also posed a problem for the conversion.
The introduction of the Valiant in Australia did not go to plan however, and with delays insurmountable the decision was taken to import 1,000 CKD body kits to get the car to market sooner. January 1962 would see the launch of the RV1 or R-series car to an enthusiastic response. Local testing had seen some adaptations made such as increasing the wheel rim size to 14” for better ground clearance and the decision was taken to only offer the 225 ci engine rather than the 170. To keep things simple only a four-door sedan was offered.
Production got underway properly with the SV1 Valiant in March 1962, bringing with it numerous changes. Externally the toilet seat trunk lid was gone along with the cats-eye tail lights, replaced by round units and the radiator grille was different.
A manual gearbox shift moved from the floor to the steering column, there were larger brakes and the fuel tank now held 11.7 gallons (53L/14USgal). Sealed ball joints and tie rods reduced service costs. This time the run was just on 10,000 units and again the cars sold in double-quick time. Thanks to their distinctive style, the early Valiants have always had a strong following and many survive.
The next step was the AP5 Valiant launched in May 1963, returning to the Australian Production nomenclature of the Royal. This signified some significant deviations from the US car, such as a flat rear window, higher trunk lid and unique grille. Rear sheetmetal was stamped locally, while the front clip came from the US in a move intended to enable easy adoption of any facelifts. Again detail improvements were made to the mechanicals and an upmarket Regal trim was added to combat the Holden Premier and Falcon Futura.
A wagon was added for the first time later in the year, called the Safari and notable for its load capacity: the floor was 18” longer than the competing Holden wagon with seats folded. The improvements together with more conventional styling saw waiting lists grow, despite just under 50,000 cars being built in 22 months. At the same time the new Tonsley Park factory in Adelaide’s south was under construction to increase capacity.
March 1965 saw the AP6 Valiant launched, with a more expressive grille similar to the US Plymouth Valiant and Barracuda but more importantly a full-width dash fascia inside. Two important additions to the range followed, a Wayfarer ute and the 180hp 273ci V8, the latter came with power-assisted brakes standard although discs were not yet available.
V8 sedans were identified with a vinyl roof in addition to badging, while station wagons had a roof rack. An illustration of how basic cars could be in this era is the announcement that windscreen washers were now standard across the whole range.
Today the first model ute is a rare sighting as only 2,000 or so were built.
The March 1966 VC Valiant was a major facelift and had significant changes with available disc brakes, a new all-synchro manual gearbox and the Torqueflight being replaced by the Borg Warner auto used across the Australian car industry. This also applied to the manual gearbox and rear axle and was part of the push to meet the 95% local content required under the 1964 Menzies Local Content Plan; this would have implications later on. Air deflectors were fitted each side of the station wagon tailgate to prevent dust accumulating on unsealed roads.
This was probably the peak period for the Valiant, with a more powerful 6-cylinder engine than the competition and for a few months at least the only V8 available. Overall the Valiant was more upmarket than the Holden or Falcon competition, although the Premier and Fairmont respectively were worthy alternatives with their own strengths.
At this time the Valiant was also exported to the UK to rather ambitiously start taking over from the Humber Super Snipe. While probably the best option available to Chrysler, who now owned the Rootes Group that built the Humber, replacing a pukka luxury car with a car based on a cheap economy model was a tall order and it never really caught on. This view also shows the distinctive tail lights of this model (note the wagon and ute retained the previous styling).
Surely the most famous Australian Valiant must be the “Never Never Safari Tours” VC Wayfarer that appeared in the 1986 film Crocodile Dundee, driven by the great John Meillon as Wally. The car was in the Fremantle Motor Museum, in the port suburb of Perth in Western Australia. The museum has since closed after the lease on the wharf-front was not renewed by the Port, I am not sure where the car is now.
The VE model Valiant introduced in October 1967 adopted the new generation body from the USA, although it was a mix-and-match of the 108” Valiant wheelbase and Dodge Dart front sheetmetal. There were still significant variations from the US car though, with a unique roofline and rear window. Responding to the competition’s more powerful engines a 2-barrel 160 hp of the 225 slant six was available.
There were a lot of new safety features across the board and a new top trim, the VIP which had a vinyl and small rear window to distinguish it externally, together with bucket seats featuring adjustable head rests on the inside. The three chrome strips on the rear fender indicate a v8 engine.
The Australian Valiant continued to be available as a Safari wagon as well as a Wayfarer ute because while Chrysler Australia was still selling the full-size Dodge Phoenix it was in fairly small numbers, and they had not yet introduced the Hillman Hunter (that looked like a shrunken Valiant). The Valiant was their bread-and-butter car and needed to offer a full range of body styles. Full in the Australian sense that is; there was no interest in a large 2-door sedan, while a 2-door hardtop would be trialled later in response to the 1968 Holden Monaro.
The VE would be the first Valiant to win the prestigious Wheels magazine Car of the Year award and was a much-needed response to the 1966 HR Holden and XR Falcon, with the latter now having a more spacious interior, powerful V8 option and the long-wheelbase Fairlane luxury version.
The VF model introduced in March 1969 would address some of these issues with a new long-wheelbase (112”) Chrysler VIP model (not badged as a Valiant), a 210 hp 318 V8 to replace the 273 and air conditioning as an option. Unlike the Aussie Fairlane, the extra wheelbase of the VIP was done the “proper” way by lengthening the rear doors instead of between the door and wheel arch. The VIP also gained dual headlights to further distinguish it from lesser variants, which including a new Regal 770 trim. Also note that the front turn signal was now set into the top of the fender.
The first of two other significant introductions was the Pacer performance model which had 175 hp thanks to higher compression, a 2-barrel carb and less restrictive exhaust. The car came with a tachometer, finned drums (optional power discs) and lowered suspension – plus some stripes of course! The manual gearbox shifter was on the floor, but perhaps because it required fewer changes, the shift pattern placed reverse where you might expect to find 1st, which was actually below it.
Top speed was up around 8 mph while the ¼ mile was done in 17.6 seconds – regarded as good then (for a 6-cyl), but glacial now! The Pacer represented Chrysler joining the Falcon GT and Holden Monaro GTS on the race track as well as at the traffic lights, but as with some of the US Mopar models being a 6-cylinder it was a cheaper option to purchase, fuel and insure.
Six months later the Hardtop was added to the lineup as Chrysler’s response to the Holden Monaro. It was built using imported Dodge Dart body panels from the firewall back combined with the new local front sheetmetal. The Dart’s 111” wheelbase and lengthy tail makes it the longest coupe ever built in Australia, even compared with the later model Valiant Hardtop.
The VG Valiant of August 1970 was the last new model for this generation, with another facelift featuring rectangular headlights this time and wrap-around tail lights. There were various improvements such as the first standard air conditioning on an Australian car for the VIP but the big news was the $33 million new engine, unique to Australia although I gather it was briefly considered for use in the US also.
It was called the 245 Hemi as the name had some recognition in Australia despite the 426 not reaching these shores (on the street at least), mind you the combustion chambers were not truly hemispherical, as Paul has previously explained. The base single barrel had 165 hp and 235 lb-ft, both representing a useful gain over the 225 slant six, and it was 40 lb lighter.
The Pacer programme was expanded and now had the choice of a 2-bbl making 185hp or optionally 195 hp, or even a 4-bbl version with 235 hp. The Hemi Pacer dropped the quarter mile time by an impressive 1.2 sec over the 225, to 16.4 sec.
The only thing more confusing than that was the different color scheme that the different engines were painted – it was the 1970s after all! The engine above can be identified as a 195 hp version thanks to the yellow painted rocker cover and air cleaner instead of black for a 185 hp Pacer or silver on the standard engine. Mind you once the bean counters found out that the different paint schemes cost more, they were quickly dropped.
The brakes were upgraded to ventilated front discs, albeit without power assistance, and many other performance or racing-oriented options were available. This included a 35-gallon fuel tank (159L/42 USgal) for the sedans that were to be raced in the Bathurst 500 mile race.
Another new option for the Pacer was the Hardtop. It is worth noting the ‘way out’ paint colour names typical of the era; Bondi Bleach White, Thar She Blue, Little Hood Riding Red, Hot Mustard and Hemi Orange.
This brings us to the end of part one of the story of the Valiant in Australia as well as cars immediately identifiable as a Valiant for North American readers; next time we will get into the new generation that ran through to 1981, longer than Chrysler itself in Australia!
Part 2 – The Valiant In Australia
Additional reading:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cohort-sighting-chrysler-valiant-vg-hemi-six-power/
www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cohort-outtake-king-richard-down-under/
A great overview. Just a few comments.
The taillights on that AP5 wagon are stock. There were several styles used, probably corresponding to the availability of new parts from the US. I remember being surprised by the taillight change at the time!
We always called the VIP the Valiant VIP. Even a mate who owned one called it that. I never knew they weren’t “supposed” to be Valiants! But then, as Holden later found with the Statesman (called Holden Statesman by the great unwashed, though GMH insisted it wasn’t a Holden – until they gave up), Aussies love pulling the pretentious down a peg. Must be in our genes or something.
VE VIPs had the same wheelbase as all other Valiants; the stretch came with the VF.
Likewise the smaller “limo-style’ rear window came later – not sure whether that was the VF or VG. To Aussies not up with the latest US styles, the smaller rear window seemed a backward step to the Valiant’s excellent all-round visibility. Little did we know the real backward step that was to come with the new body!
Heaps of stories I could tell, but I’ll let someone else have a say!
Pete, i remember the first NZ Valiant VIP i ever saw here.. it was a black vinyl roofed VF with very distinctive ‘318’ badging. The rest of the car was in bright metallic mid-forest green colour and yes, it DID have the smaller rear window opening! That was during late October 1969 at the beginning of Bayview Road on Maramaratotara Bay Whitianga on the Coromandel, and I saw the impressive thing parked-up there out of the upstairs window of my father’s beach place under construction at the time, during a break between banging-in the nails in the tongue and groove flooring.
I was disappointed the VG 318, which my father bought the following July from Ridley Motors in Taupo, did NOT have these same large distinctive engine identification badges, but rather more discreet downsized rectangular ‘318’ tags on the side of each front guard and on one side of the rear tailgate. However engine power had increased from 210 to 230 horspower with the VG, so I guess that was some consolation lol.
The tail lights are correct because that is an AP6 not AP5. You can tell by the front fender return creaseline which is higher than a AP5.
Great article.
THANK YOU ! .
Lovely cars, all of them .
I’d think a Valiant Ute would make a good Shop Truck .
-Nate
I saw the Valiant Ute in the movie , Crocodile Dundee. Chrysler in the U.S, didn’t have a car pickup like the Chevy El Camino or Ford Ranchero. Very interesting to see the differences in Australian and U. S. models. Keep em coming ! Another vehicle I thought was interesting in that movie was the truck they rode into the outback in. The windshield is recognizable from the International in the U. S. but the front end style is different.
Don’t forget the L-body based Dodge Rampage!
Of course, it came along a bit later, after the ford offering was cancelled if I remember correctly.
Excellent article.
The Australian cars became more different to the American ones with every new model. My favourite would have to be a 1967 VE Safari wagon with 318 and Torqueflite column. Just a beautiful Australian car that anyone could drive today in modern traffic.
I agree – it is such a shame that the VE wagon never made it to North America. A ’67-’76 Dart wagon would have been an awesomely practical car.
They brought the wagon back for the Aspen/Volare and had it for the ’66/earlier Darts, so clearly its absence was an error in judgment.
Agreed. Hard to fathom, actually, but then in the US one could buy a “mid-sized” Coronet/Belvedere wagon for not all that much more money. Still.
It wasn’t just Chrysler. GM dropped its Chevy II wagon after 1967, while the Falcon wagon survived until 1970 only because the ’66 and up version shared its body with the Fairlane. I think the official explanation was that intermediate wagons had taken away so much sales from compact wagons that compact wagons were no longer needed, but you have to wonder how much of it was manufacturers just preferring to upsell customers into intermediate wagons. The 1968-72 Chevelle Nomad wagon appears to have existed purely as a placeholder for customers who were looking for a wagon priced below the normal intermediate range.
Almost as soon as these wagons were dropped, sales of small cars began to rise again, and wagons would prove to be popular in the subcompact class in particular, where they represented maximum space utilization in a small exterior package. Chrysler didn’t have a domestic subcompact, but I’m sure they saw the Aspen/Volare wagon as applying the same principle to the next size class up. Ford would also re-enter the compact wagon market with the 1978 Fairmont.
Awesome article. Keep up the great work. But as I posted in the other article, AUS cars are, to me, like American cars made by aliens from another planet. Look so familiar, yet so different. And thats the beauty of this site; all corners of the globe get to see what the other corners got. Would like to see a few more technical articles here, and I am very tempted to write some. But not sure how they would go over. I have been here since day one, and my personal feeling MOST here would rather just look at pictures and reminisce. I could be wrong. Or right.
Every time I see a picture of an American Valiant, it looks alien to me!
I’d certainly be interested in a little heavy tech! But I understand…anytime I’ve thought about writing about the Jacobs Brake or something I stop and wonder if anybody would actually like to read that, or, if I really want to write in shop manual technical style… 🙂
At least I’ve got less of a headache following this than the Aussie Fairlane article.
Tech articles? Bring them on! We’ve done some,, maybe not super-technical, but I’m sure that a healthy percentage of the readers here would be very interested. I certainly would 🙂
Okay then. Mine would not be super tech either, no need to bore readers with all the details. But this could be fun. And I look forward to meeting you Paul, in person someday. You are in Eugene, I am in Tigard. How hard could it be. And you could take pics and write up my ’83 Ford Ranger 5.0 4×4 from your prospective 🙂
“How hard could it be”
Isn’t that Jeremy Clarkson’s favourite phrase? 🙂
I think you’re wrong here ;
I see many obviously younger folks commenting but obviously they’re not making the Old Folks comments us Geezers do….
I am always learning new things from the Younger Folks here when I click on newer vehicle articles , I don’t often as moderns have little interest to me .
-Nate
For a country with the population of Texas to be designing and building their own cars is amazing. Think of them more like mass produced kustom cars perhaps, suffice to say I for one am eminently proud of the product this country turned out and the innovative designs delivered.
The 1953-54 Dodge and De Sotos mentioned were in fact badge engineered P25 Plymouths. The picture titled “AP5 wagon (possibly with modified tail lights)” is in fact an AP6 as it has the raised spear profile on the front fenders. Tailights on AP6 Safari wagons are a bit confusing because some used Canadian round lights which were later replaced with vertical lights as seen on the VC wagons and utes and AP6 utes.
Love the article John. As a CC, I always preferred a 60s Valiant to the other ‘big three’. I had an AP5 Regal Safari with the 225 and push-button auto and a VG Hardtop with the 245. Both were just so much fun; beaters but solid. The VG was driven from Sydney to Melbourne and back along the coast road one xmas with no problems and many great memories.
Question for the cognoscenti; I’ve always known the ‘AP’ designation to stand for ‘Australian Production’, but I have read that for the early models it actually stood for ‘Australian Plymouth’. Can anyone clarify?
Please enjoy Stirling Moss introducing the VG model…
Don the AP1 originally stood for Aust. Plymouth 1 when they were still going to build the AD1 Dodge and AS1 De Soto.
I should have mentioned the Stirling Moss ad, not a bad celebrity endorsement!
Thanks John.
Quick story, perhaps apocryphal, on Stirling and the VG. I worked at the same ad agency (Young & Rubicam Adelaide) that created the campaign, although I was there many years later. There was an oft-told legend (we had Mitsubishi at the time so the agency was still full of gear-heads) that the concept of using Moss to launch the VG was presented to the client, one of whom declared ‘You’ll never get him!’
To which the agency replied; ‘Shall we ask him?’, opened the boardroom doors and in walked Stirling Moss himself.
That’s fantastic! Imagine if Chrysler had said “no, not interested in him”…
hehehe
The VE rear end is interesting as it closely resembles (but doesn’t seem to be identical to) that year’s US Barracuda and the next years Satellite.
“Little Hood Riding Red” is my new favorite color name! 🙂
It does, however, use Barracuda taillights. Always thought that was a neat touch, but I never liked the VE front end. Too square and austere. They should have taken the Dodge Dart grille when they pinched its fenders and hood.
Excellent write up. I’ve had a lot of exposure to Aussie Valiants lately, as my brother-in-law very recently purchased a 1970 VG Hardtop, and I’ve been helping a friend with the restoration of his 1969 VF VIP. My attention used to be limited to only the Fords and Holdens of the era, but now I’m an even bigger Valiant fan.
One thing I really love about Valiant Pacers was the technicolor engine bay, with the brightly coloured air cleaner, valve cover, and intake manifold. Fun details like that really set Chrysler apart.
I saw the Crocodile Dundee ute back when it used to be at the Fremantle Motor Museum. I’m also well familiar with the York Motor Museum, as I worked in York for several years while I was going to college. The motor museum was just a few buildings down. For a small museum they have some very auspicious cars in their collection, including a very gorgeous Tatra T 87.
Marlin you are correct – the photo was from the Fremantle museum not York. It was taken almost 10 years ago. My photos from the York museum would have been on film a year or two earlier.
I’m not sure where the ute is now, but given both the Fremantle and York museums feature Peter Briggs’ cars it may be at York – I will have to make a return visit next time I am over there if possible.
Love these early Valiants- they seem to be incredibly durable, and handsome cars as well!
The young girl who lives next door has an original AP6 sedan as a daily driver, painted in Granny’s bathroom green. I think I need to get a nice VG series to keep it company.
Thanks for the reminders, great piece neatly summarising an optimistic period. Full disclosure: I’ve owned a VE standard sedan (no heater!), briefly a VE VIP (with factory shift lever keylock) and a fully loaded VG VIP (sadly with rust beneath the padded vinyl roof). Enjoyed every one of them. All sensibly sized cars with great visibility and easy cruisers.
Valiants seemed to survive better – relative to the numbers sold – than Fords or Holdens, it also seemed the original owners held on to them longer. I’ve no scientific basis for this beyond observations during my first 25 years in inner city Sydney.
On the topic of the VE VIPs intended to replace the Super Snipe Series V, this situation led to an acquaintance stumbling across one in Paris the sometime in the 80s. He was under the influence at the time and initially thought the vision a side effect of the merriment. Apparently rust was their big killer, the UK got the wagon too.
Tangentially relevant thread: while weighing up what exactly to do with the Humber, Chrysler considered installing the 273 V8 and went so far as a pilot run, one of these cars was offered for sale back when there were still classified ads to read.
A few 273 2 barrel cars were made and some 318 4 barrels.
Those Humber Super Snipe V8s would still exist, I think there is one in Sydney for example. The problem there was by the time this happened the basic car was almost 10 years old.
I think you are right on Valiants getting better care on average too.
They made 10 V8 Humbers before the idea got shelved they are mostly still around, though many home grown ones are out there too.
“Valiants seemed to survive better – relative to the numbers sold – than Fords or Holdens… ”
I most definitely agree. As a teenager in Melbourne at the time, I think part of the reason is that they were less likely to get into the hands of teenagers like me as a first car. I remember the kid next door getting a VF Pacer when he wrote off his ’62 Falcon, but that sticks in my mind because of how unusual it was. Most kids were either Holden fans or Ford nuts. Monaro GTS! How about that GTHO Falcon! If you were keen on Chryslers it was sort of, “Oh, them? Really?”
Back in the day Valiants were regarded as a bit more conservative and upmarket compared to the Holden and Falcon. That image must have worked against them sales-wise though, as with the VE they ran an ad in the car magazines pointing out that a similarly-equipped Valiant was within $3 or $4 of Holden and Falcon pricing. To the bitter end Chrysler tried to overcome, shall we say, the stigma of superiority.
In the 70s I owned a 1969 “bottle green” Valiant Signet 2 door sedan (the top trim line when it was built). Being a Plymouth fan I love reading about these “alternate universe” Chrysler products. If I could find a nice and yet reasonably priced Valiant wagon…I would buy it. Better yet would be to win the lottery and buying a 67 or newer Australian Valiant wagon. In today’s U.S. market, that Valiant wagon would be the perfect size.
Interesting that these Valiants would “preview” Chrysler’s use of turn indicators ABOVE the head lights…a styling detail that would (eventually) appear on the American Chrysler Le Baron.
Neat, the way the brake booster moves from one side of the firewall to the other….depending on the engine options.
Hey Howard. Just to clarify the brake booster positioning, up to the 1969/70 VF, Australian Valiants used VH44 in line boosters with all engines, located on the passenger side firewall. As from 5/70 VG onwards, these gave way to the full boosted PBR system, where the booster was before the master cylinder, hence being located on the driver’s side.
I know of at least one 68 VE wagon that’s made the journey and now residing in the USA, belonging to a fella by the name of Kenny, I think from down GA way. He also took an AP6 ute home, which he has since sold on.
Pic of Ken’s VE parked at Home Depot attached (I hope)
Nice one Carl. I imagine that the VE wagon would get less attention as being a unique import these days, compared to if it had been imported in 1968!
Actually John, Ken gets plenty of attention in “Sal Safari”. Locals easily see the family resemblance to the 67/68 Dodge/Plymouth, and it gets a fair bit of exposure, as it’s his daily driver. Still RHD too.
Boosted brakes were only optional on Valiants up till the VJ model when it was standardised that includes the performance models you had to tick the box to get a booster.
I’m a little in love with the turquoise wagon on Torq-Thrusts…oh wait. Dang it, now I’m going to have to try to find a set of small bolt pattern Torq-Thrusts!
Aaron ;
Trust me , many here would love to read all about Jake Brakes and Mico Brake Locks , Top Cylinder oilers on and on and…
Your writing style won’t be boring FSM style , I know this in advance , please do it .
-Nate
Fine set of pix and descriptions.
Seeing these ‘parallel universe’ cars always makes me wonder why the US companies didn’t make more use of their OWN variations. AMC could have answered Euro GTs with its OWN Argentine Torino. Chrysler could have answered the El Camino and Ranchero with its OWN Valiant utes.
Great overview, a fun read on a weekend morning. I’ve been fascinated with these “parallel universe” cars since I read an article titled “South American Americans” in a 1981 issue of the old “Car Exchange” magazine. They did an article about the early Chrysler Royal around the same time.
I wonder if perhaps the front end styling of the AP1 Royal was originally done as a proposed 1957 Plymouth facelift if the ’55-’56 body had been continued for another year.
The homemade ute in the top picture would be my pick of the litter although any of the six cylinder utes or wagons here would make me happy.
Startled to see that the hemi six was upright. What’s the story there? Just to make it fit better between those narrow fenders?
+1. Was a little disappointed it was not factory.
The Hemi six started as a US pickup motor project, but projected sales revealed it would not be economic to build a new engine. Chrysler Aus picked up on it from there. I think it was just easier to build an upright engine, the engine bay didn’t change. More that there wasn’t a reason to lean it over I suppose.
I think PN did something on that engine a while back. Don’t remember it being upright. Learn something every day.
This is like a parallel universe, a ChryCo Twilight Zone. It’s even stranger than Canada.
Terrific overview – always fascinated by the alternate universe of Aussie cars.
My brain was completely stuck on Studebaker Lark with the lead photo. It wasn’t until I studied the rear quarters a bit more that I could see the Valiant.
It was great for a guy who’s had as many A-body cars as I have to see all these never-seen-before Valiants at one sitting. I really have to say that my Saturday morning is being well spent today.
Hmmm, I wonder if that AP3 Wayfarer headlight and grille would fit on my 55 Plymouth Belvedere. That is really cool looking. So different, yet so familiar.
Or even the AP2 grille – build your own small Desoto!
There was a DeSoto version of the Dart/Valiant in South Africa never seen one in the metal
There is one photo I saw of these South African DeSoto Rebel, it’s only a Lancer rebadged as a DeSoto http://www.linnea.com/~banne/ as well as some brochures scans of a 1962 Dart/Polara rechristened DeSoto Diplomat and Lancer rechristened Rebel http://www.forwardlook.net/forums/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=4232
The green AP6 wagon is my car, which made it’s first trip last weekend when that shot was taken. The taillights are factory although I have not yet refitted the badging on the tailgate. Great article all it needs is a Royal Wagon!
Thanks Travis, you’ve done a great job on the restoration! There were quite a few nice Valiants down at Phillip Island.
I will need to find an AP5 wagon to change the photo, otherwise the AP5-AP6 differences are pretty small. I think I have probably seen more imported 1960-62 Valiant wagons than AP5s.
On a similar note, for some reason I had the idea the first ute was the AP5 and was despairing ever finding a photo of one, until the penny dropped – I had photos of a couple of AP6 utes. For there only being <2000 built they get around!
Dad bought a 2 year old 66 Aussie Valiant 6 cylinder as Mum couldn’t get on with his LHD Falcons.It was a cool car and when he passed it to Mum he bought a Dodge Dart 6.We had the Valiant 5 years,very comfortable and reliable
It’s too bad that the Ranchero / El Camino era ended so soon in North America. A Valiant-based small pickup would have been a great iteration of that concept.
but they would have had to use longer coupe doors like the Elclo / Rancho
I don’t think it would have been competitive in the US with the short sedan doors
and if they had have, I would have one in my driveway for sure
The longer doors were never used in Australia, also in the ‘traditional’ Aussie ute format there wasn’t any significant storage space behind the seats as the load bed extended under the rear window to an angled panel parallel to the seat backs.
Love that Safari wagon! I drove a ’65 Barracuda for many years (225) until rust did it in. Bring on the tech too. I’d like to learn more about that Hemi 6 for sure.
The indicators set into the fender tops are a really nice touch on the later models–wonder why no one ever thought of that in the US?
I also do like that first photo ute, homemade or not!
Great stuff… between this and the Fairlane post I’m going to be daydreaming about Aussie cars for quite awhile!!
I’ve heard of the Chrysler Valiant, but because I’m not from Australia, I’ve never seen one in person. If it weren’t for the steering wheel being on the opposite side of the car, it looks almost exactly like our American Plymouth Valiant. 🙂
The floor pan, chassis structure and much of the sheet metal prior to 1971 was borrowed directly from your Plymouth, and to some extent, Darts. Naturally, as mentioned in the article, some changes made to suit our tastes down here 🙂
Were they? I didn’t know that. But then I’ve never driven a Dodge Dart or Plymouth Valiant.
Hey John. Just a point about the VG Hemi Pacer power output mentioned in the article. The “normal” Valiant 2 barrel option (black top in base models and Regals) produced 185HP, the standard Pacer between 195-200, that gain being achieved with the dual outlet exhaust manifold and better air cleaner. Then the E31 option (2 barrel track pack) produced around the 210-215HP mark, and topped off with the correctly quoted 235 horse E34 4 barrel. Another less common engine offered, was the “street pack” 4 barrel, which lacked much of the internal modifications, but had the 4 barrel, east-west mounted AFB Carter.
All VG Pacers had the yellow rocker cover and air filter case, except the 4 barrel option with its chrome exposed element type.
Riverside Subdivision, Fenton, Missouri. You’re in our thoughts and prayers……
Valiant isn’t just the name of a street, or the neighborhood park or even a car that was once built less than a mile away. It’s the effort put forth by the residents and the volunteers who came to help sandbag their neighborhood.
The subdivision where most of the streets are named for Chrysler products is what its name implies. It sits directly on the Meramec River which is cresting at an all-time high tonight or early tomorrow. At present nearly all of the streets leading into Riverside are flooded at one point or another.
The original Crocodile Dundee ute is actually in the York Motor Museum in WA.
I am lucky enough to have an A81 optioned VG hardtop (Stirling Special) three speed manual on colum, factory valiant sport wheels, factory vynal roof
Great piece. I’m very interested in Chrysler… a bit late maybe… I especially like the old s type… reminiscent of Studabakers… I only recently learned that Chrysler cars were such good quality both here and in the USA…. and good performance too… in the USA they lovingly restore the muscle cars… barracudas etc… I used to like the old dodge Phoenixs too… huge engines and very luxurious…oh I used to like the push button automatic on the s types… cheers😊
They’re unmodified stock items.
This is really fun stuff as I look at the Australian design additions to the American Chrysler automobiles. Thanks
I’m working on a similar article detailing the E. Barrieros company of Spain. They built a Dodge Dart well into the late 1970s, as well as a group of 10 1965 [badged as 1966 cars] Chrysler Imperial Ghia limousines, as Barrieros bought the dies from Ghia when Chrysler pulled the plug on all factory support for the limo. If there is an interest in reading about the Barrieros cars, I could do a write-up here.
Bill, shoot me an email (google Daniel Stern Lighting and you’ll find my contact info); I’ve got a Barreiros resource for you.
Excellent read on the Chrysler’s made in Australia.
I am not 100% sure, but I am pretty confident that Chrysler (Australia) were the first to offer and start production of a V8 (273’s) models in Australia where Chrysler Australia designed an Australian Production/Plymouth (Based on US designs, just tweaked a little) by producing 70% of the car in Australia scaling down the importation of panels and chassis’sThis being the AP6 1965, only 1440 came off the production line from the 43,344 AP6 Valiant’s that were manufactured. Which is what made me buy this piece of Australian History.
Lord that’s pretty Vince .
-Nate
hi Australian Production, It makes not fit every things happened C = cHRYSLER , D -= Dodge S = De Soto, P = Plymouth Hence AP = Australian Plymouth , when the the Chrysler Royal was on the drawing board , there were 3 variants , C ,D and P , acorrding to Gavin Farmer P was choosen. now way back into history . the Plymouth division created the Vailiant ………… 1936 p1 was a plymouth that carried on till the late 40`s with P15 all Plymouth ……………………….. Australia choose the P design , in keeping wit then Valiant so your ap5 = AUSTRALIA PLYMOUTH # 5
It is not correct to say “the Plymouth division created the Valiant”. That’s not what happened. The Valiant was originally conceived and marketed in the US as its own marque. In the States—and only in the States—it was repositioned as a Plymouth model for 1961. It carried on as its own marque in Canada through 1966, sold at both Chrysler-Plymouth and Dodge dealers. Elsewhere in the world, it was a Chrysler Valiant, explicitly, or a Valiant by Chrysler; either its own marque or a Chrysler model, depending on the market strategy in various countries.
“AP” certainly meant “Australian Plymouth” when that’s what it was, but the Plymouth brand was not a part of the Australian market strategy when the Valiant came along. Hadn’t been for many years. Does it make sense to think CAL would sortakinda resurrect the brand with a whispered reference in the model designation…? The AP5 was built from scratch in Australia, versus the previous RV1-SV1 models assembled in Australia from CKD kits originating in North America. “Australian Production” makes more sense in that context, don’t you think?
Just to get it on the record, here’s the other end of the homebuilt RV-1 Ute in the pic at the top of this post. This is from SV1Ambo’s Flickr:
Looks well done to me .
-Nate