It is no secret that I like convertibles a lot. It is also no secret that convertibles (like their sedan counterparts) are rapidly disappearing from the automotive landscape (at least affordable ones) as automakers pivot towards pickups, SUVs, and EVs.
Some manufacturers have just recently stopped making convertibles (like Buick, who stopped making the Cascada after the 2019 model year). Others have gone decades since last producing their last open car, and a few have never sold one in the US. Which brands have gone the longest without making a convertible? Let’s dig in.
First some ground rules: I’m only going by models for sale in the US since that is what I am the most familiar with. I’m also only counting brands that are still presently for sale in the US as an active drought (sorry, Studebaker). I’m also only counting factory offerings, not aftermarket conversions. Lastly, I’m going to ignore brands that have made convertibles within the past few years (like Buick) to focus on brands with convertible droughts of a decade or longer.
Mitsubishi – 10 Years
Mitsubishi’s last convertible was the Spyder version of the Eclipse, last sold in the 2012 model year. With a lineup currently consisting of SUVs and the econobox Mirage, Mitsubishi appears unlikely to offer another soft-top model any time soon.
This is too bad because Mitsubishi has a brief, but interesting history with convertibles. Think the 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK was the first modern retractable hardtop convertible since the 1950s Ford Skyliner? Nope, that honor actually belongs to the 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT Spyder.
Cadillac – 13 years
Cadillac’s last open-top car was the C6-based XLR roadster, sold between 2003 and 2009. I always felt like the XLR deserved better, but it was handicapped by the need to keep the price well above the already expensive C6 Corvette to avoid cannibalization. This pushed the price of the full-zoot XLR-V to over $100K, which was a lot of hay back in 2009. Unless you were a diehard Cadillac aficionado, it would have been difficult not to consider some of the other alternatives at that price point, like the SL and 911.
Honda – 13 years
While Honda has sold many convertibles in Japan over the years (the Beat and S600 Kei cars, among others), Honda’s first, last, and only convertible model offered in the US was the S2000 (although the targa-roofed 1990’s del Sol comes very close with its roll down rear window). The S2000 was last sold in the US in 2009, starting Honda’s 13-year convertible-free streak.
Toyota – 14 years
Toyota’s last convertible model, the Camry Solara, rode off into the sunset (presumably with the top down) after the 2008 model year.
Kia – 30 Years
OK, now we are getting into serious losing streak territory here. Kia first started selling cars in the US through a network of four dealers in 1992 and has never offered a convertible for sale here.
Kia did offer a rather interesting convertible in its native South Korea – the Kia Elan. When Lotus ended production of the Elan in 1995, Kia bought the tooling and continued to produce and sell the car in South Korea as the Kia Elan until 1999. However, it was never sold in the US, where we have been waiting 3+ decades for an open-top Kia.
Acura – 36 Years
Acura first started selling cars in 1986 and has never sold a convertible model. Acura has teased a convertible second-generation NSX for nearly a decade now, with one appearing as a prop in 2012 in The Avengers. 2022 is set to be the final year of the second-generation NSX, and alas there appears to be no convertible model in sight.
Hyundai – 36 Years
Acura and Hyundai have at least two things in common (and probably little else): They both started selling cars in the US in 1986, and neither has ever offered a convertible model. On April 1, 2019, Hyundai dropped fake pictures of a Hyundai N Roadster as an April Fool’s joke on the automotive press. However, the joke is on Hyundai, as the N Roadster looks fantastic, and could be a viable Miata competitor if it were actually real.
Subaru – 54 Years
Subaru first started selling cars in the US in 1968, and joins Hyundai, Kia, and Acura among the ranks of brands never to have offered a factory convertible. It does seem odd that a brand synonomous with outdoor lifestyles has never offered a vehicle to let you truly experience it while driving. Still, that hasn’t stopped some enterprising individuals from trying.
American Sunroof Corporation did convertible conversions of various Subaru coupes over the years, from the humble GL to the wedgy XT, some of which have been posted here in the past.
Subaru did tease at least one convertible concept over the years, the 2003 B9 Scrambler, a roadster with a surprisingly Fisker-like front end and a yellow(!) windshield.
Lincoln – 55 years
OK, I tipped my hand with the lede photo. Still, I did a spit take when I figured out that the last convertible produced by Lincoln was the 1967 Continental. At least they went out on a high note.
How exactly did Lincoln manage to snooze through every convertible fad of the past half-century, from the convertible renaissance of the ’80s, to the roadster revivals of the ’90s (Miata, Boxter, Z3, SLK, and TT), and the retractable hardtop craze of the 2000s (Volvo C70, Chrysler 200, BMW 4-series, Lexus IS250)? Were the product planners too focused on the task of moving Town Cars to an increasingly geriatric audience?
That is not to say there haven’t been glimmers of hope over the decades. Ford did contract with Custom Coachbuilders Unlimited to chop a handful of Mark VII convertibles in the 1980s.
Lincoln has teased a factory convertible model over the years, most recently the 2004 retractable roofed Mark X concept, based on the 11th generation two-seater Thunderbird.
For decades now it seems that rumors of a Mustang-based Lincoln Mark coupe would circulate every so often, with the even more remote possibility of an open variant. A quick Google image search will reveal dozens of renderings of what such a car could or should look like. Still, I wouldn’t hold my breath for this one – like all legacy brands with EV aspirations, Lincoln seems to be focusing on semi-autonomous rolling living rooms and utility vehicles, and not vehicles for driving enjoyment.
What about GMC?
Last “convertible” GMC was the 1991 full sized Jimmy(K5 Blazer clone) But only the rear half of the top came off.
Gotta go back to 1975 and earlier if you want the full convertible. It was a 1 piece fiberglass top like the later ones that required 3 people to take off. But it extended all the way to the windshield header, the front doors had frameless door glass.
Other than the limited production Viper, Dodge hasnt offered a factory convertible since the 1994 Dodge Shadow.
However there is a company(Drop top customs in Florida) that has been sawing the roofs off the Challenger for over 10 years now. The results are absolutely stunning. I read starting this year(maybe it was model year 2021 or 2022) you could actually order the convertible thru the dealer. Car rolls off the line in Ontario and is shipped straight to Drop Top Customs for the conversion.
Not sure what the warranty situation is, but its not cheap. $26000 to have the roof sawed off your Challenger. Ive seen one in person and it looked like a factory job, its quality work IMO
The only time I drove convertibles is when I was driving through scenic areas. Jeeps in Colorado and Utah, convertibles in Hawaii, and Miatas because they are too damn small to climb into without the top down. Other than that, most people riding along with you in an open car, don’t like it. The back seat riders are being buffeted by wind, no one can hear the audio, and everyone is getting sun burned.
Convertibles are for show. Photos. Movies. They are like those narrow-gauge trains and trolleys tourists ride in because they look like fun. Fact is – it is more fun to photograph these vehicles than ride in them. If it wasn’t for Hollywood, convertibles would have died out decades ago.
No one wants their $75,000 vehicle pooped into by a flock of seagulls.
A flock of seagulls pooped into my car and I was about to get my revenge but they ran, they ran so far away.
Perhaps while listening to Flock of Seagulls?
I agree, I always thought a convertible (in most instances) is a waste of a good coupe. Exceptions (even though I’d still prefer a removable hardtop) include the Miata, various delights from Morgan, and SUVs like Bronco and Wrangler, as well as FJs of old.
Counterpoint: A small 2 seat convertible with a stick shift is the safer and lazier alternative to a motorcycle when traveling winding back roads in good weather, and they don’t require a helmet. I owned many over the years, often as only vehicles, although admittedly they serve “toy duty” much better.
However, nowadays in many areas those moments are either non-existent or far too few and far between. I turned in my convertible card shortly after moving to Florida. It’s just too damn hot. If you drive a ‘vert in Florida you’re either a tourist or a masochist.
I will grant that convertibles have limited use cases, but then again so do jet skis, fishing rods, snow shoes, bbq grilles, swimming pools, and pretty much every other piece of outdoor gear you can think of. A convertible is very much a lifestyle vehicle, one that not everyone gets. I personally don’t get fishing, but that is just me.
When looked at in terms of basic transportation, convertibles don’t make much sense: No one needs a convertible. But that is what makes them so great. The fact there are only certain times of year I can drive with the top down (I live in Ohio) makes those times that much more special.
Did you actually list BBQ grilles and fishing rods?
If you don’t live around Lake Erie – south from Columbus, those are year-round things.
I can see a roadster as a convertible easily. OTOH I always wondered why Lincoln and Cadillac would make a convertible. The whole essence of their cars is luxury and their smooth, quiet, isolated from the outside world ride. A convertible negates that quietness even with the top up. Besides where are you going to put your inside courtesy lights and of course no C pillar for opera lights…Duh, there goes luxury!
Well for some the reason for luxury cars is to be seen in a luxury car and what better way to be seen than in a car w/o a roof?
Why do you think that Presidents and Kings rode in open cars until JFK? So they could be seen by the people! It’s one of the reasons that JFK ordered that the “bubble top” removable roof be removed from his limosine (sic) on that fateful day! If it had continued to rain that day instead of the weather clearing and the sun coming out, the top would have been installed and history would have been very different! After 22 November, 1963, however, the Secret Service would have none of it! It’s been closed cars for Presidential limosines (sic) ever since.
That squished picture of the Lincoln Mark X is unfortunate. I still consider it one of the best looking concept cars of the last 20 years. Gorgeous. I doubt it would have sold well, and probably would have driven just like the meh Tbird, but it would have made the automotive landscape a bit prettier for few years.
Would Dodge not rate here? The last convertible I can think of is the 2nd gen Viper, which ended production 12 years ago.
The only convertible I can think of that was uglier than the Toyota Camry Solara was the (Miata-based)? Mercury Capri.
The Capri was most definitely NOT Miata-based.
It was front-wheel-drive, and based on the Australian Ford Laser, which was sold as the Mercury Tracer in the U.S.
Assumed they meant “Miata competitor”.
If only it WAS Miata based, I had one after college and it was all Mazda 323 underneath. The turbo was “quick enough” and it was at least practical for a one-car lifestyle. As for the looks… it’s amazing that the same basic layout about 9″ wider was so much more attractive for the Lotus Elan.
Loved the Merc!!
What about the Dodge Dakota Convertible Pickup Truck or the Chevy SSR retractible hardtop convertible pickup truck (that was a mouthful, LOL)?
Tom, I with you on this, however don’t lose faith. Just because consumer tastes are pivoting toward pickups, SUVs and EVs doesn’t mean the convertible is dead. After all Cadillac advertised the last American convertible in 1976. I fell of my chair when I saw the chopped top Aries in ’81 spurring Iacocca to produce the ’82 Lebaron and that revived the convertible market. I must say I’ve been waiting patiently for a (factory) Challenger or 300 convertible to no avail. I’ll keep coddling my 200 for now. However, we still have the Mustang and Camaro.
I’m convinced the melanoma I had cut off my thigh in 1991 was from a Labor Day weekend road trip in a ’69 GTO convertible in ’84. The resulting sunburn was sandblasted on a windy beach on Ocracoke Island. The brush with death didn’t stop me from buying a ’76 Eldo conv. later in ’91; in fact, it probably caused it. That was a mistake for reasons other than possible UV exposure.
I hate riding in convertibles, the wind is always at the back of my head, not a pleasant sensation. However, I do like seeing them on the road. Cool, fun, whatever. A nice distraction from everyday cars.
But I still don’t want to ride in one.
For short, under 45 road minute trips, I love them.
The Subaru Brat might halfway count?