Last fall, I was relocated due to my job. While awaiting the sale of our house, we rented a house in our new location. Being built in 1963, the garage was simply too short for the wife’s beloved Ford E-150 conversion van to fit inside. The only option was parking on the street, something she would not consider. She suggested leaving the van back at our house and purchasing an inexpensive car for the interim. What a woman!
Doing the obligatory scan of craigslist, I found just the ticket. It was a one owner 1993 Buick Century with a 3.3 liter V6 and all of 41,425 miles. It was a bargain. Two days later it was in my garage.
The original owner of the Buick was going to the nursing home and I dealt with his son. When test driving the car, I asked if the rear tires had been replaced. The son whipped a small binder from the glove compartment and scanned it. He said, no, the rear tires were the original 19 year old ones installed by Buick (that had 11 psi of air I later discovered). He also told me his dad usually changed the oil every 500 to 1000 miles. The interior is a time capsule. I did ask him what the small cotton globs were on the seats. He stated his parents kept towels on the seat and it was residue from the towels.
He also said there was a twin to the car floating around Jefferson City (mine is on the right).
Since purchasing it, I have discovered about four™ such twins in Jefferson City plus these cars are all over Eastern and Central MIssouri (and I’m only counting the Buick’s, the Oldsmobile’s are almost as plentiful). Wikicars stated Buick routinely sold about 100,000 of these Century’s annually during the 1990’s and many of those were to fleets.
That is likely so. However, it seems that most of those 100,000 cars from each year are still in daily use with some really showing it.
The man who bought my Buick originally truly loved the car, having never let it sit outside over night. Thankfully, his sensibilities did not allow him to opt for the “Pimp It Up” Special, as some have been forced to endure.
After purchasing the Buick, my wife saw this particular little number and was fascinated by it.
Having always had a soft spot for wagons, she momentarily wished ours had been born as a wagon. She said it had to be rare. Little did she realize what else is running around town…
Now, here’s the punchline: All of these Buicks pictured were found within 1.5 miles of my house. I didn’t have to scout them out; I can think of about three more here in town that I didn’t photograph. Three of these cars were within two blocks of my house with two of them parked across the street from each other. Never have I seen, or maybe I’ve simply never noticed, so many cars of a particular vintage still floating around in daily use. Since buying this car, I’ve seen many other such Buick’s between Jefferson City and St. Louis, still hauling people around in reasonable comfort with reasonable economy.
There was a reason GM sold so many of these and now I know.
It was at this point that GM had finally gotten all the bugs worked out of these cars, and for the time, they were very well put together. Fancy? Not really. State-of-the-art? Hardly. Glamorous? That’s a bit of a stretch. But they did a lot of things right for a lot of people. Sure, they were (and are) a bit of a throwback when it comes to automotive design, but when the most important things are “Will it get me where I need to go in reasonable comfort, and get me there reliably and efficiently?”, these cars proved that they were more than adequate.
Or, in other words, I’d drive it!
I spotted a commercial of a 1987 Century broadcasted in Mexico where it was sold as a Chevrolet model. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goFRlRjlPyc&feature=relmfu
Yep, I owned two of them, both courtesy of the death of a parent. Mom left me her ’86 Century Estate (fake wood, fake wire wheel covers, bordello velour interior), then seven years later dad left me a bare bones four door sedan (four cylinder, three speed auto). Both were embarrassments to me, made worse by them being among the best cars I even owned – totally uncool (I was still in my 30’s and early 40’s) but way too good to justify getting rid of them quickly.
If GM ever hit a home run, it was with these cars.
I have bought countless versions of the Century. Classic, Limited, Estate, just plain jane. Even one of those rare coupes that simply doesn’t translate well in the flesh.
I usually get two types of buyers for these vehicles. The first is someone who doesn’t do that much driving. Classic example of this was a nurse who bought a 1993 or so model with only 28k miles on it. She only needed it for a mile and a half commute to her workplace. Apparently her last whip averaged only 2k miles a year, and she isn’t even 50 years old yet.
The other is usually a young person (or couple). I had a couple that financed a Taurus with me. 98 model, nothing special. About 2/3’s of the way through the note they just ran out of money. I spoke to them for a bit. They returned the car, and I promised that when they get their financials back in order they could finance another car with me on the same terms.
Six months later they came back and financed a 1990 Buick Century with 100k miles. They paid it off early, and now their sister/SIL is financing a 2001 Camry Solara. Nice folks.
Anyhow, Buicks are cockroaches par excellence in Georgia as well. Great story Jack!
Had a 1982 A-body (Iron Duke, 3 speed auto) and got to drive my exwifes 1994 Cutlass Ciera quite a bit (3.3V6 four speed). You could tell the incrimental improvements that had been made from one to the next but the trans on the Oldsmbile gave up the ghost at 75,000 miles.
They were (and are) a good value for the intended market.
I bought a `90 back in `06? for $225. It was your standard Custom model with the Iron Duke. It was ugly, but I bought it as a winter car. I did some rust work on it, but now am unsure why I chose red. Looks weird.
St. Louis=home of the Century
The thing that miffed me the most about old Buick was how they shifted from their image of cool, powerful whips in the 60s-70s to wimpy, fugly grandma cars. All of the Buicks starting in the 90s especially pandered to the Old Fart Brigade with those horrid “convertible” tops (“wait! Is that a CONVERTIBLE Century?!? Why yes…uh no..I mean yes..it is! Oh…no it isn’t, boy they had me fooled for a minute though…”), and of course the giant speedo markings and radio displays, custom made for the near-blind, which was Buick’s core demographic.
Oh yeah, and for some inexplicable reason, fancy people from this generation were transfixed on putting their initials on everything, like a dog who has to piss on every tree. Oddities like monogrammed shirts, towels, door mats, you name it. Well, it seemed like half of all Century owners (more than half with the convertible tops) had personalized license plates stuffed with his/hers initials on them. One of the many ironies, of course (aside from the fact that nobody cares who owns a car) was that in their minds they had “arrived” in the social status world but in reality they were in one of the most plain cars ever made.
Now, one might argue that people did that so they could easily find their car in a parking lot loaded with look-alike cars, but you’d be wrong. That’s what the plastic rose attached to the antenna was for.
I went through a series of Jack In The Box antenna heads on my ’94 Mazda Navajo when I lived in Kingman, AZ in the mid 90s. Someone kept ripping them off so I kept getting more (probably my wife who was embarrassed by them).
Actually a good argument could be made that Buick changed back to grandma cars after the 1970’s. I’m old enough to remember seeing a lot of older folks driving black, or dark blue, or oxidized bluish black Buick sedans, and even riding in a couple of them, both of whose rear ends howled even though they weren’t driven over 50 mph. I’m sure a lot of those Buick owners had a tough time relating to the flashy, powerful mid-1950’s to 1970’s Buicks. I remember seeing an occasional Buick like the blue 1960 Special 2-door sedan with no radio, or the dark blue 1956 Special 4-door sedan with a manual transmission and small hubcaps, and figuring that these belonged to people who’d traded in older Buicks.
They are the cockroaches of thee road! When I am driving I make it a point to never get behind one. They are either piloted by old folks or drug addicts.
Isn’t that the truth? When I lived in Kingman, AZ in the mid 90s before the SUV craze was in full swing, there were plenty of these things, either driven by retirees or really skinny scuzzy meth heads.
The analog to my own driving rule: never get behind a guy wearing a hat.
Somebody owes me a beer…
@Geozinger:
Someone owes you many beers!
I owe you a couple, but I would immediately issue a “Cease and Desist” order to Mr. Lord for not properly crediting you with that phrase!
@ Zackman & Geozinger: No intentional plagiarism here! The phrase was a suggestion. So, I just drank a beer for each of you!
@Jack Lord: No worries. Here’s how we resolve the trademark infringement… I get to squeal tires around Honolulu in your big ol’ black Mercury and we’re all good! 🙂 Drinking a beer for me was a good start, but buying me a beer is better… 😉
@Zackman: same to you bud. We’ve got to tip a few in person…
I do, at least one. I made up the headline. Thanks!
Do they have beer in PNW that can sustain an American-born Bavarian?
That could be an appropriate penance… 🙂
Here is an a great example of what happens when a car company actually pays attention to its customers and not auto-journalist-spoiled-brat-retards. Yup, the good old Roach didn’t have 400 hp and couldn’t do a quarter mile in 13 seconds but once GM got the bugs out (no pun intended) they sold loads of them. I remember the buff mags just slamming the Roach and calling for its demise but GM made tons ‘o money on each one and just kept sending them out the door. These were good, cheap, reliable cars that drove well.
In fact the Roach of Today has to be the humble Corolla, which can be had a year old as an off rental for really cheap, as were almost all the Roaches I have ever seen. A year old Corolla LE can be had for like $16k here in Canuckistan. Similarly, the Corolla (or Roach II) is detested by auto-journalist-spoiled-brat-retards but loved by people don’t give a hoot about g-forces or 0-60 and want a reliable car that is cheap to run to get to work, bingo or wherever….
I agree with you on both points. These cars were like doggy doo – they were always underfoot and ugly to look at. But I’ve gained more respect for them, as well as GM, over the years. I never owned one, so I formed my opinion from the car mags that loved to put them down and the “dumb” customers who bought these things.
Well it’s come full circle. I’m now one of those “dumb” customers who drives an ’06 Corolla, the car that everyone loves to hate anymore. But my Corolla does what it’s supposed to which is run forever and be cheap to own, just like these Buicks did back in the 80s and 90s.
I had a 1990 Ciera Roach for a year that I paid all of $750 for. It had one of the best instrument panels I have ever seen, the interior (red velour!) was great and the stereo rocked. In that year I changed the oil once and then sold it, for, get this, $750!
The 3.3 litre V-8 had excellent torque and the THM transmission was a perfect match, seamless. The only problem was it was a little heavy on gas but at $750 it didn’t matter much.
I agree that there should always be good, cheap and reliable cars. My only quibble with you is that was it really Buick who should have been selling them? These things would have made fabulous Chevrolets. Buick should have kept the “good” and “reliable” parts but done with some class and style and with some more luxury. But somehow it was Olds and Buick who were selling all of the good Chevys, and Chevy was selling fwd crap that nobody remembers (or wants to).
Exactly.
It seems these still roam around these parts too (Seattle) since they don’t have to endure the rusting salts too much (once in say, every 2 years if they’re lucky and even then, only for a week before the rains return and the salt washes off).
That said, they DO seem to hang on for the long haul, whether you wanted them to or not.
For a basic sedan (or a slightly fancier one such as these Buicks), they weren’t half bad looking for the times they were built.
I happen to like the last iteration Celebs I think best but the Century’s were nice looking too.
Funny, humorous, and weird posts like this are why I LOVE CC!
Amen!
This was my grandma’s last car before she lost the ability to see well enough to drive (at 93 or so) and then passed away. Not a car I’d own, but I did get to drive it a few times and it was, well, what you’d expect for a grandma car.
My first remembrance of Buicks were the flatulent growlings of 1950 Jetbacks in my town. But by 1955, Buicks took on a new light. Celebratory colors in two-tone combinations. It was an epiphany from a kid sick of the fuzzy gray Dodges his dad drove.
There were a couple of quasi-punks that lived in my neighborhood in Lowell, MA that both owned ’55 Buick 2dr hardtops. They had blond hair combed into ducktails and their bimbo girlfriends had big hair. Their Buicks had those chrome half covers on their headlights, and they had flipper bars on their hubcaps. Naturally they had two-tone paintjobs. I was one impressed 8-year old.
Later while driving my cab in Chicago on Sheridan Road, a doorman hailed me. As I was driving him around the block to reach his apartment building, he told me that he really had the hots for “a deuce and a quarter ragtop with donut whites”. I nodded as if I knew what he was babbling about as I began to deconstruct his statement. OK, ragtop is a convertible. Donut whites are wide whitewall tires. But deuce and a quarter? Then it hit me-a Buick Electra 225! Not exactly my aspirational ride but it sure had the doorman all wet and runny.
Cars today that juice my jockeys today are a lot different than what I lusted for in my teens and twenties. If Buick still made a car like the one pictured below, I’d be a customer.
I had one of these for three years as a daily driver through college. I bought it with 120K for $1000. It had a 3.3 V6 and a 4 speed THM. The thing never gave me a problem and would just run and run. The Buick only needed brakes in the time I owned it. The previous owner was an old man who ruined the finish on the paint by trying to buff the clear coat with polish for non clear coat cars. I was able to fix the paint on the roof, hood, and trunk but he really polished the sides of the car, which I was never able to fix with polish and wax. The car wasn’t that rusty as it just had rust on the lower part of the doors, probably because the dew wipes were shot. The car went till 160K without a problem. That’s when the trans decided to stop shifting past second gear. Not changing the fluid in 160K will do that. I ended up replacing it with a 1995 V6 Thunderbird that had 68K, thinking it would be just as reliable as my Fox T-bird and the Buick had been. I was wrong but that’s another story…
I’m going to need a beater car in the fall so I don’t have to drive the Fox T-bird (which has never seen snow) or the new Mustang in the winter. I’m going to pick up either a Century or Ciera. They are still easy to find in decent shape in rust country, they are easy to find parts for, and most importantly with the 3.3 V6 they are virtually bullet proof. They are probably some of the best cars GM has ever made.
I’ve got three new A-body names:
1)The Chevrolet Celeberoach
2)The Buick Centuroach
And
3) The Oldsmobile Cutlass Cieroach
Note:I never saw many Pontiac 6000’s so I don’t really consider worthy of being called roach-mobiles.
My Dad and his brother owned (at the same time) a 1982 Celebrity and a 1986 Pontiac 6000, respectively. My uncle (the younger of the two) as always was cooler with his stiffer Pontiac suspension and V6 to my Dad’s Iron Duke.
Wow, this post really hit a nerve with the commentariat! Great to see some positive feelings for a car that GM “got right” for once.
These are still thick on the streets in my area, usually soldiering on in the hands of (probably) their last owners. I’d say I see more of them than any other GM product from the era, excepting pickup trucks.
Hard to believe theres a GM car everyone thinks is ok but I guess this is it.
There is a modest but steady supply of these things in Japan of all places.
90% of them are wagons with wood applique and (unfortunately) with a 3.1, not the unkillable 3.3. All with tiny mileage (20-35-40 kmiles max). And dirt cheap.
These things are literally all over Bayonne, NJ! The new car of choice seems to be the 11/12 Sonata though.
I had a 1999 Century, and I would still have it except the road salt used in Maine ate away the rocker panels so bad that it would no longer pass safety inspection. That car was a goooooooood car!
The 1982 model year A-bodies, looks-wise, were years
ahead of the out-going A- to be redesignated G-bodies.
(whooh.. was that a government sentence or WHAT? lol)
Both exteriors and interiors were so futuristic compared
to what we were used to from the late-1970s. Too bad
assembly and quality control weren’t on par with those
looks.
>> I’m only counting the Buick’s, the Oldsmobile’s are almost as plentiful)
Buicks, not Buick’s. Oldsmobiles, not Oldsmobile’s. Don’t make plurals with apostrophes. Ugh.
If you don’t mind me pointing out, you could turn these into good sleepers by dropping a blown Series II 3800 under the hood in place of whatever engine it came with, as well as a good transaxle for it, in addition to the appropriate electronics, while keeping the plain exterior intact.
I just acquired this ’86 Century Custom wagon. One owner car, with only 128,000 km on it. Iron Duke, 3 speed auto. Even still has the original GM rubber floor mats!