At the end of The Tempest, one of Shakespeare’s final works, protagonist Prospero lamented that “we are such stuff as dreams are made on, and our little life is rounded with a sleep.” One could be forgiven for thinking in 1954 that the little life of the Corvette (which in itself was based on a Motorama dream car) would be rounded with a sleep in short order. Sales were grim, sports car fans being unimpressed by the lack of a manual transmission and casual buyers by the lack of roll-up windows. Of course, competition from across town and swift improvements throughout the ’50s gave the Corvette its life of 70 years and counting. But those first Corvettes, like Prospero, are still magical.
I caught this Corvette way back in 2010 at the Sloan Golden Memories car show in Flint, MI. The ’54 is one of my favorite Corvettes; it’s not so rare as a ’53 but still has that same show car styling and rakish stance. These days, nobody cares that it’s a cut down Bel Air with a Stovebolt and a Powerglide; the crowd that formed around this particular example makes that plain.
Though blue, red, and black were newly available colors on the ’54 Corvette, most of them were still painted Polo White as all of them were in 1953. At the time of these pictures, our featured Corvette hadn’t seen a paint job in years, perhaps since 1954. I get weird when I see a car like this, running around and snapping as many pictures as the circumstance will allow – I truly love an imperfect car. I love early Corvettes in particular because of the little details: the slim bumpers, the chrome exhaust trumpets protruding just the right distance from the tail, the little finlets atop the taillights, the glass covered license plate, the low-mounted trunk button. This is Harley Earl at his best.
The nose is just as engaging: the fencing masks over the headlights, the now-iconic toothy grille, the reverse-opening hood. I think the Mitchell-era Corvettes were probably more traditionally beautiful, but the Earl-era Corvettes were dazzling, and that sums up the difference between the two as designers. Earl lived by the little details, the stuff that many would call gingerbread, and thus his best work was an event. On the other hand, Mitchell excelled at the shape as a whole, and he didn’t want anything to detract from it. It’s like the difference between my ’63 Thunderbird and my ’63 Riviera: The T-Bird is a showstopper, but few would argue that it’s more empirically beautiful than the Riviera, if empiricism in beauty is a thing.
Both Earl and Mitchell were right of course; they both were right for their respective times. With all this being said, the 1954 Corvette is actually somewhat restrained for a show car, and certainly more so than production Corvettes of the later 1950s.
Under the hood, some felt that the early Corvette was let down by its 235-cubic-inch Stovebolt six. In reality, the old Stovebolt redeemed itself fairly well; with triple Carter sidedraft carburetors, the full-pressure-oiled 235 managed 150 horsepower (155 later in 1954). The fairly light Corvette was therefore fairly brisk, especially for its time, getting to 60 in about 11 seconds. The ’55 Thunderbird was truly no faster, although it didn’t even pretend to be a sports car.
The early Corvette’s basic design lasted almost 10 years, and anyone who has looked at or driven one would recognize that uncomfortable proximity between steering column and sternum that is a hallmark of C1 Corvettes. Still, the show car themes continue to the interior, where the symmetry extends to the first use of dashboard coves and full instrumentation (in a not-so-easy-to-see layout). Still, it’s clear that the Corvette’s game was showing off and few would ever need to look at those handsome gauges. The much maligned and aforementioned Powerglide had a lot to do with that, but that fault would be addressed with the 1955 model and its new Chevy V8.
After narrowly avoiding cancellation, the Corvette would go from strength to strength in the 1950s. Sales kept improving, and the Corvette became Chevrolet’s long-term halo model. One might have never expected that to happen after a mere 700 or so were sold in 1955, but the best-laid product plans often go awry, and here we are.
More than once in my life, I’ve had a specific daydream. I sell off a couple of members of my fleet and buy a Polo White ’54 Corvette exactly like this one, one with paint chips and a couple rips in the seats, and I drive it everywhere. I’ve never been a Corvette guy, but I am a fan of the Motorama dream cars and the weird optimism that a ’54 Corvette represents, unlike the existential pessimism that clouds the dissolution of Prospero’s “insubstantial pageant” in The Tempest. Yes, the Corvette has sustained itself for seven decades, and it too will eventually fade into our misty past, as shall we all, but to think that the staggeringly capable 2024 Z06 owes its existence to this humble dreamboat staggers the imagination. Long live the Corvette.
I have long preferred the very different 1956+ version (and always questioned whether the 56-57 really belonged within the C1 designation). However, I have become more intrigued by these as time has gone by. These really do have some gorgeous details, and I never noticed that trunk release button below the rear bumper! I especially like the sculpting of the rear end.
They’re all pretty good to me (’53-’57). 🙂
Brings back memories of the ’53 that is my earliest childhood memory, and my father’s and my unsuccessful four year attempt to buy the car back 20 years later. Like JP, I’ve always preferred the 56-57’s in the C1 generation, but have a great love for these, including on variation that I’ve never seen in the metal, er, fiberglass: A ’55 with the 265 and a 3-speed.
That was a rare sighting, as only 70 ’55s were built with the manual.
I was at a Corvette show in Ocean city, MD last year, where there was a ‘55 with the Blue Flame six and Powerglide. I was floored as I thought all ‘55’s were V-8’s. A bit of research reveals there were seven ‘55 sixes built for 1955. What a rarity.
It is unusual to see an image of a ’53/’54 Corvette wearing blackwalls. This car looks better and distinctive because of it.
I noticed that too, but for a different reason. I prefer these with WWs!
Hmmm…didn’t think much about it at first, but I think I prefer the blackwalls on this particular car. I’ll take it either way, but blackwalls would be cheaper!
Thanks Aaron. Excellent job tying in The Tempest, and very appropriate. I’m far from being a Corvette guy, but I have to agree with JPC around the lovely sculpting of the rear of this car and the details such as the headlight fencing and the dash. Definitely show-car stuff as I’d imaging that trying to actually use those instruments would be near impossible.
A very enjoyable read!
Thank you, Jeff!
It’s a looker and always will be. One did not buy this car in 1954 to go grocery shopping.
The single headlight Corvettes (’53 – ’57) made a big impression on me as a kid, even though they weren’t new at the time. I just liked the purity of their styling over the gaudier four headlight versions.
Although the ’56-”57 is objectively a better car in every way, I do have a thing for the original. I especially like its front end; I’m rather sorry it went away in ’56. I love the recessed headlights and their protective mesh covers; apparently the covers were not legal in some states and had to be removed.
The rear end of the ’53-’55 is of course a bit gaudy and very Motorama, but it works for me as a period piece. There were plenty of Italian sports cars with fins and gaudy styling during this period too.
I recently came across a 1955 Hot Rod magazine that showed how the Chevy six could be hopped up very substantially, starting with the bigger 261 cubic inch truck block. It made as much or more hp than the stock 265 V8. I have a fantasy about a ’53-’54 Corvette with such a warmed-over six; possibly even a GMC 320 six with a bevy of carbs and exhaust headers.
As to the PG, it’s one of the most maligned and misunderstood devices ever. Ironically, that’s a more recent development, as at the time it was widely seen as a very advanced and very effective device to eliminate the necessity of shifting. A number of hot rodders actually bought new ’55 Chevy V8s with the PG for that reason; its torque converter gave it excellent acceleration without a clutch to wear out. It’s fascinating how different the perspective was at the time and how that eventually changed.
The drag racing crowd was much more open to the PG than the tweedy-cap conservative sports car crowd. But Jim Hall’s automatic Chaparral would show them just how effective a two-speed automatic could be on the track a few years later.
It’s puzzling, as to why the 261 wasn’t dropped into the Corvette. It would have fit, given that its block was no taller than the 235’s: http://devestechnet.com/Home/TheVenerable261
The 261 didn’t arrive until 1954, by which time the V8 was just around the corner. Given the very low volumes, the change couldn’t be justified economically.
Yeah, if you gave me a choice between a ’54 and a ’56 or ’57, that would be tough. The ’56 was a beautiful restyling, and the ’57 had the 283, which was the perfect engine for that car. I’ll take any of them. 🙂
You have to be an inline lover to fully grasp these early Corvettes .
-Nate
I’m lucky I’ve had the chance to see a few of these 6 cylinder C1s in the flesh. I really have to admire how well they worked with what they had. The most pleasant surprise to me was the exhaust note: Normally I find the sound of an inline six to be an insipid drone, but on this car it blob-blob-blobs nicely at idle ( almost like an old speedboat’s exhaust slapping at the water ) and accelerates with a nice muted but slightly raspy snarl.
I’ve always heard that a Stovebolt with a split manifold was a pretty sweet sounding engine. I don’t remember if I heard this example running (it was 13 years ago), but I imagine it sounds great with dual exhaust.
It seems that the six cylinder/Powergilde issue is often a point of discussion on these Vettes. But without the Six, there would have been no Corvette until 1955. Chevy had no other engine, and I think a big Olds Rocket or Buick Nailhead would have been a non-starter. And though I wouldn’t call these perfectly styled, they have aged well; as Paul points out, quite a few European exotics had similar chrome, fins, etc. As a kid, though, I did prefer the ‘55 TBird.
I’m sure more than a few were the recipients of a Nailhead swap early on, and I imagine that would be about the coolest thing ever.
For acceleration, maybe. The heavy Nailhead, though, would have altered an early Corvette’s weight distribution to almost that of a M.E.L.- powered ’58 Thunderbird .It would have been better to wait until 1967 for swapping, given that the lighter-cast second generation Buick eights weighed almost equivalent to the original Stovebolt six
Judging by what I’ve seen online, the 235 and the Nailhead weigh about the same, right around 650 pounds.
I assumed that the Nailhead would have been a lot heavier and wider, thus impractical, but you know what they say about assumptions. Thanks for the corrections/comments. And it was used with a lot of success in the Old Yeller road racers.
I knew Earl began at a custom shop in LA, but I didn’t know it was his father’s. Wikipedia:
“The senior Earl eventually changed his practice from horse-drawn vehicles to custom bodies and customized parts and accessories for automobiles, founding Earl Automobile Works in 1908.” So adding that little something extra to catch the eye was in the blood.
I wonder if Ed Cole and the Corvette would have survived if not for the huge success (close to an auto industry gamerchanger) of the 1955 Chevy and small block V8. After that, Ed Cole could pretty much do whatever he wanted, i.e., Corvair.
In that regard, the 1953-55 Corvette might have ended up in the same league as cars like the Studebaker Avanti and Maserati TC by Chrysler.
I saw the same car in 2019 at one of the Back To the Bricks cruises in Flint.
I think I prefer the whitewalls.
.
It’s the same license plate – good to see it’s still kicking around! It looks pretty good with the whitewalls.