One of the unexpected highlights of this year’s Motorclassica show was a tightly-packed display on the upper level of the Royal Exhibition Building. Just look at the variety – Goggomobil Dart, Peel P50, a couple of Messerschmitts plus more. There are some really interesting stories amongst this lot.
The Goggomobil Dart was a local effort, built by Bill Buckle in Sydney to add some pizazz to the local Goggomobil assembly operation. It had the ‘big’ 400cc engine (instead of 300 in other models), and a 0-50 mph time of 27 seconds which depending on your definition may or may not have lived up to the advertised claim of “vivid acceleration”!
Here is another Dart from last year’s show, that was on display as an art object in addition to its interest as a car. Re-named D’ART, it was done by realist painter Robert Clinch with his signature paper planes. It is certainly impressively done, no matter whether you ‘get it’ or not.
Here is the interior – emphasising the low cost, light weight aspect of the car. They only weighed 345 kg or 760 lb! Depending on what source you read they made 500 or 700 of them from 1958 to 1961, and apparently couldn’t keep up with demand.
One of the more common microcars was the Isetta. This one is a BMW Isetta 300, built under licence alongside their grand luxury cars that were so out of place in post-war Europe.
Here is another car showing the front-opening door with its attached steering wheel. The arrangement is really quite ingenious, even if it is barely conceivable as a car by today’s standards. Next door is a Heinkel, which came out shortly after the Isetta, or it might be a UK-built Trojan.
This 1963 Mazda R360 coupe is an example of Mazda’s first car, that was introduced in 1960. It had a 356cc v-twin engine in the back, with 16 hp and a top speed of 52 mph. A small number were brought to Australia prior to the introduction of the more mainstream 800 Familia. It is interesting that weight is just 380 kg (840 lb) – not much more than the fibreglass Dart roadster.
This car was used as a daily driver in Sydney until at least the 1970’s, before it was exhumed from long-term storage and restored about 15 years ago. It is used regularly but is usually seen in a small museum in Portland where this photo was taken. It looks like it should be in a Disney Cars movie!
Next is something you might not associate with microcars, but there is no doubt that the Steyr-Puch Haflinger is a micro off-roader with its 643 cc rear-mounted flat-twin engine and 600 kg weight (1320 lb). They are a real mountain goat of a machine.
You can see where the engine lives underneath the rear load bed – carrying capacity is an impressive 500 kg (1100 lb). I had not realised that while over 40% of the 16,647 produced went into military use, some of these were used by the Australian Army. They had 46 delivered in August 1966, each with a small trailer, and were disposed of between 1972-1979. It seems that they were mainly used on-base by supply battalions.
This shot of the driving compartment is poor, but I thought it was worth including. While cars usually have intrusion bars in their doors, I suppose you could say the chains here are used to prevent extrusion – ie falling out!
Here is a Vespa 400, with its roll-back canvas roof. Again there is a spot in the Cars movies to be had surely? It had a two-stroke 2-cylinder engine, with top seed of about 50-55 mph. An interesting quirk is they were actually built in France, not Italy! The car was designed by the famous Italian scooter manufacturer, but built by ACMA of Fourchambault near Dijon who had also previously built scooters.
Next we come across a unique Australian car, the Lightburn Zeta. Lightburn were an engineering company in Adelaide who manufactured a range of products as diverse as boats, concrete mixers, wheelbarrows, trailers, hydraulic jacks, washing machines and dryers. The Zeta was powered by a 324cc Villiers two-stroke engine and 4-speed gearbox, and had a steel frame (74″ wheelbase) and fibreglass body just 121″ long. The intention was to sell the cars across Asia, while in the Australian market they were marketed as a second car – something that was not common at the time.
There wasn’t a rear door or hatch, which limited practicality, but one infamous feature was that with optional rails the seats could be mounted on the roof to act as an impromptu grandstand. Or perhaps get away from Australia’s deadly wildlife? Whatever, it certainly puts the Honda CRV’s picnic table in the shade! This was perhaps an attempt to make a feature out of a flaw – the seats had to be quickly removable to access the rear compartment. Surprisingly there doesn’t seem to be any photos on the web of the seats on the roof.
The Zeta Sports was released soon after, based on the 1957 Frisky Sprint from the UK; surely one of the most inaccurately-named cars ever? There were some changes such as the doors being eliminated to simplify and strengthen the body, and it had a Sachs 498cc 2-cylinder engine which increased power from 16 to 21 horsepower.
The design is more elegant from the rear, and sleeker than the Goggomobil Dart – which had gone out of production more than 2 years previously. It was fair to say that the market had moved on – just 28 of the Sports roadsters were built.
The interior is a little more conventional than the Dart, in that it has an instrument panel, but it was still pretty minimally-equipped.
But the roadster pales into insignificance when compared to the Zeta ute! Perhaps that is overstating things, but yes everything can be made into a ute in Australia. You can also see what the front of the vehicle looks like in this shot. Not the best-looking car of 1963’s class really, if I’m honest.
The tray on the back of this one has metal drop sides on a flat-bed tray while others basically had the roof removed, opening back seat area for load carrying as seen below. At least the utes had an opening tail gate… Only around 8 utes were built altogether, and the highest number were sold to the Sydney City Council and used in the Hyde Park.
Note the advertisement seen on the windscreen above is boasting of 1,000 miles non-stop! The Zeta cost only 10% less than a Mini, so it is not hard to see why few were sold – just 363 cars or at least body shells were built in about 2 years, and it seems that around 80 of them were not built up into complete cars. Lightburn quietly went back to their other operations.
These Suez Canal oil crisis-inspired cars weren’t the first microcars though, they had first emerged in the very early days of motoring as a more attainable way of getting yourself on four wheels. The Peugeot Bébé BP1 cyclecar, as they were known then, first appeared in 1913, replacing an earlier Type 69 model that originated in 1904.
There were a trio of the cars on display. I had not realised that these were actually designed by Ettore Bugatti no less, who sold the design to Peugeot. It was a more ‘grown-up’ design than many, with a 844cc 4-cylinder T-head engine (ie with side valves, but intake and exhaust on opposite sides of the engine) and a conventional drive shaft where others had chain drive. Like others, the car weighed 350 kg (770 lb), and could reach 60 km/h (37 mph) which seems like plenty on what are almost bicycle tyres.
This car was owned by the Griswold family from 1913 when they purchased the car in New York City, and drove it 300 km to Lenox Massachusetts and subsequently Old Lyme Connecticut. The family enjoyed the car until 2014.
This one is even more remarkable. It is one of few that were sold new to Australia, and ended up in the 1940’s as a landmark in a wrecking or car sales yard on Parramatta Road, the main road in western Sydney as “the car up a tree”. Many years later it was rescued but the body was not salvageable. The search for replacement panels turned up a car in Scotland that was bought by a young man who dismantled and stored it before signing up for World War 1. Unfortunately he never came home, and the car sat for 60-70 years before becoming the source of a new body for the car from Sydney, then in New Zealand.
Next time I will delve into either the Art Deco cars, or the American muscle cars.
Further Reading:
Car Show Classics: Motorclassica Outdoor Display
The Goggo Dart looks pretty good compared to the rest, despite its performance not living up to the name.
The Haflinger was supposedly designed by Erick Ledwinka, which explains its “Austrian School” layout and engine. The snug-looking cab is common among cab-forward military trucks, which need high ground clearance more than crew comfort. I’ve seen a Pinzgauer where I live, but not these.
I’ve been in a Haflinger or two, and seen quite a few, in their native surroundings. They were particularly popular with operators of Alpine huts, as a supply vehicle. They weren’t fast, but they were as unstoppable as any automobile ever built.
I saw a road test from a local farming magazines that mentioned running slow enough to get out and walk beside, eg for feeding stock, and running at 50 mph, which was higher than the claimed 47 mph top speed. Plus driving over a 12 in log, up a 45 degree dam bank, etc – they got a good impression of its capability, and were impressed with its comfort too.
Your comment made me find that test! Rather incredibly, the brochure claims the 47mph governed maximum is when carrying the 500kg load limit. Another remarkable thing is that these were assembled in Melbourne, and available for civilian sales at about the price of an optioned-up Holden. I’ve seen a couple, but had no idea of that.
One thing. The test claims the super-low first has a 63:1 overall reduction – could this be right?
Those guys would have been used to calculating tractor gear ratios so I assume so. The planetary reduction ratio in the wheel hub would have helped.
That Haflinger looks a lot like the side by side ATV’s we sell here at the motorcycle shop, engine is in the same place too. I assume those were physically bigger than the modern side by side?
Probably similar to a JD Gator, but there are others that are bigger than the Haflinger – 59″ wheelbase (there was a later lwb version), 112″ length, 55″ width
I think the Dart and the Zetas are my picks of this bunch. Quite a feat really, making an Isetta look common and ordinary. 🙂
The mechanical and built ineptitude of Zetas were the butt of motoring journo jokes for many years after their release, especially as Lightburn’s best known products till then were washing machines (you know, along the lines of “it’ll clean all your clothes but leave your underwear brown”, etc). Talk about vaulting ambition.
They sure as hell aren’t common (and that’s no spin). I’ve never seen one.
These are so adorable!!! They had a R360 when I went to the Petersen Automotive Museum’s Monozukuri exhibit a few months ago. It reminds of a cross between a Ford Anglia and the tiny car the massive dad drove in The Incredibles.
The Zeta looks like a Nash Metropolitan, which is not a bad thing. The actual Nash is bigger in person that what I’d been led to believe in photos so maybe this car is closer in size to my original impression.
The length of the Zeta is 10′ 1″, so just slightly longer than the original Mini, but it has a 74″ wheelbase and is 56″ tall.
These cars are so unique! I like the Zetas the best.
Anyone here of the age to remember Micro Machines?
Yep
After my time really. How about the digital versions that were the trend about 15-20 years ago?
I’ve always loved these cars. I got to see some of them at the Petersen, as well as a Janus microcar, which could be driven from either end (and which.might make a good CC). Thanks for a most enjoyable article !
It must have been a special Janus Zundapp (or another model?), as per the photo slow_joe_crow posted below they normally had one steering wheel only. Otherwise a whole other slant on back seat driver!?!
A girl at my high school in the 60’s drove a BMW Isetta, and somehow managed to include two or three of her friends for the ride home after school (one in back and one on a lap). I don’t think they had far to go, and fortunately never got into a collision with another vehicle.
I’m sure they would be fine, the sunroof was there as an emergency exit… Or are you saying that they did collide with things other than vehicles?
Very enjoyable write-up and I do love micro-cars. I had heard of the Lightburn Zeta but not of the ute version.
Bunch of cute cars. The Vespa could be the grown-up in the room.
Either that or the Mazda, but the Haflinger would also work as a ‘proper’ car.
The Peugeot would have been quite acceptable for its time too, it seems like it would compare reasonably well as basic transport to a Model T for example. It would have also been cheaper than the Model T I believe, even before allowing the cost for shipping or assembling in an overseas plant. Of course given the smaller size it would want to be, but Ford was leading production efficiency by a long way back then.
I think the Haflinger is better described as a mountain pony, since that what it’s named after. Also if you dig the hinged front door of the Isetta, check out the Zundapp Janus that has 2 of these doors.
Do you think that would have been more popular than the BMW 600 solution with a side door and forward-facing seat? I doubt it.
The shade of blue, with the lower body gradient paint effect on the D’ART, reminds me very much of the GM Mako Shark show cars of the early and mid 60s.
The faux cardboard packaging used for the Zeta Runabout, Zeta Sports and Zeta Utility displays, are quite clever. They really do lend the impression they are oversized toy cars.
Great observations! I expect the displays came from the National Motor Museum at Birdwood, South Australia along with the vehicles but I’m not sure – it has been a few years since I’ve been there.
At one of the past shows there was a Model T in a display that was emulating the Matchbox “Models of Yesteryear” packaging, that was quite well done.
I know that even as a collection these cars aren’t heavy, but isn’t the old Exhibition Building amazing for being able to take ANY such weight in these upstairs, almost balcony-like spaces on those gorgeous wooden floors. (Native Huon pine?)
The Baby Peugeot helped Bugatti on to independence as a car maker, not surprising when you see the specs and speed of something sized in the cycle-car class. Very sweet thing, and almost one of le Patron’s beloved horse’s shoes for a radiator surround.
With microcars, I find it hard to be interested until I fix it in my head that these were real cars, produced as a solution for real needs, and not the arcane fad they always first strike me as being. Why, people actually used these as transport, only 10 years and less before I was born! It’s odd I should find it odd: I’m old enough that plenty of adults around me didn’t drive or have cars when I was a kid. Retired folk, universally on a small govt pension then, would barely have been able to afford these insecty things, and as the car was not yet universal, they didn’t even need to do that.
Haflinger for me, please.
The old couple that lived opposite us when I was young never owned a car. Eric was a butcher so would have probably only worked a few blocks from home in the centre of town.
The Zeta was marketed as “Australia’s second car” at one point, because very few households would have had more than one car in the early sixties.
Best thing about the Zeta was the four speed gearbox with no reverse. To reverse, the ignition key was turned the opposite direction so the crankshaft turned the other way. All four gears remained available so top speed in reverse would have been about the same as going forward. As Chrysler discovered during the testing which lead to the Airflow, given the vagaries of aerodynamics, it may even have been faster.
Lightburn was based in South Australia where the development work was done. When they tried to sell the Sports in New South Wales, it was discovered the headlights were too low to comply with state law and even raising the suspension wasn’t enough to meet the minimum. Instead, “sports lights” were bolted on. They looked ungainly but were a handy addition given the original lights doubled as bumpers.
I did come across that quirk, a creative way to get around the situation! Presumably the rules had changed after the Goggo Dart had ceased production a year or three beforehand.
Can you imagine if the British sports cars tried the same thing for the US market? I’m not sure that the authorities would have been as accommodating to allow such a creative interpretation of which lights were the main headlights and which were supplementary.