(first posted 9/13/2017) I ducked to the store on Sunday to buy some ingredients for a slow-cooked beef and red wine casserole. When I was heading back to my car, I spotted this Lancia Fulvia and BMW 328i. These two fine reds certainly beat my bottle of cheap Shiraz.
The Lancia stands out, especially against the background of a drab shopping mall car park and its unflattering lighting. As was typical of Italian brands at the time, the coupe is a huge departure visually from its sedan counterpart. There was also a Zagato-designed fastback which was even more distinctive. Although the fastback’s design was outsourced, the coupe was designed in-house.
Where the sedan is upright and boxy, the coupe is more delicate. There are some styling cues that tie them together, however, such as the quad headlights, the small taillights, and the unique use of chrome accenting around the rear.
This particular Fulvia appears to be a 1968-70 1.3 S, its narrow-angle V4 engine producing 92 hp at 6000 rpm. When the Fulvia was launched in 1963, its front-wheel-drive layout was quite rare. By the end of its run in 1976, the Lancia was a little less unique but no less pretty.
Interestingly, Lancia debuted a concept car with the Fulvia name in 2003. A rather pretty compact, Fiat – Lancia’s owner since 1969 – decided not to put it into production, even though it looked ready. They did, however, dust off the Flavia name, used on an executive sedan and coupe in the 1960s, for a rebadged Chrysler 200 convertible several years later.
Lancia was the creator of so many beautiful, dynamic and well-engineered cars. Their purchase by Fiat was arguably the beginning of the end of this alluring marque. At least in Europe, the sport sedan market in the 1960s and 1970s had been owned in part by brands like Lancia and Triumph.
But it was BMW that really took the ball and ran with it, the 3-Series becoming renowned throughout the globe as a world-class sports sedan. 3-Series production volumes had been steadily increasing by 1985 when the 3-Series convertible was launched. The following year would prove to be the zenith of the E30 generation, with 329,460 units produced. There’s no doubt about it: these were hot stuff in the 1980s. The 325i’s inline-six was one of the most powerful 3-Series models available, its smooth and powerful engine producing 168 hp and 163 ft-lbs.
There’s not a line out of place on these. The detailing is so simple and elegant so, even though it follows a similar theme to many other cars of the 1980s, it ends up being an exceptionally memorable and cohesive design.
Looking inside, it’s remarkable to see BMW has kept the same basic dashboard layout for over 30 years, even as their cars receive more and more features each year. When I look at photos of new BMW interiors, I’m often disappointed they look the same as their predecessors. “Why,” I ask myself, “can’t they look as fresh and interesting as the dramatic interiors in new Benzes, or look as techno-cool as a Cadillac or Porsche or Infiniti inside?” Then I remember how clean, simple and, most importantly, driver-oriented BMW interiors are. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
I have a choice of two shopping malls in my area but this is the one I prefer to go to. There are more stores, better parking and more curbside classics. What will I see next time I go grocery shopping?
Related Reading:
COAL (COJL): 1991 BMW 318 i – My First BMW, Even If It Wasn’t Mine
Cohort Capsule: Lancia Fulvia – Last Chance To Try Something Really Different
one is more full bodied than the other.
BMWs interior evolution is the only redeeming quality to the otherwise decline of the ultimate driving machine surrounding it. They’re the only new car interiors that do anything for me. These E30 interiors, while smartly laid out and attractive, are pretty meh as far as materials and durability go, so sticking with the good bones while improving things to modern standards is appreciated. Mercedes dashboards in contrast are ghastly now, a far cry from the simple but attractive, bombproof but supple interiors they had in the 80s.
I was never a big fan of the looks of the E30 as a convertible, without a roof it looks a little too much like a Chevy Cavalier, and with the subpar convertible reinforcements these got compared to later generations they flex as badly too.
Badging a Chrysler 200 as a Lancia–“sacrilege” is the most printable thing I can say.
I was going to say they dusted the name off, tied it to a brick and threw it in the river…
+ 1. What a terrible use of such great name. Really sad.
If I’d spotted that lovely Lancia, I reckon I’d have passed the BMW by without a thought!
The British and Japanese weird placement of side view mirrors, waaaay out on the fender, always puzzled me. Aside from sticking out like a sore thumb, it takes two people to adjust your mirror. And not having a passenger side mirror seems really foolish nowadays.
I love Fulvias; they have been near the top of my list of what I’d put in a dream garage since I was in Junior High. It has everything to do with the Riva speedboat inspired styling. There were so many variations of the Coupe it does make them hard to pin down, but this particular car is a 1.3 Rallye S. This car is actually missing the rear “rallye” script next to the “S”, but still contains the front grill badge intact, abliet in the wrong location. It does keep the correct placement of the wing mirror, and proper (and now unpopular) steel wheels. If this is a true example, this is the highest specification first series non-HF model. The actual later 1.3 S coupes had a different set of emblems in completely different locations on the rear compared to this example, as well as a different braking system (so the series one wheels are a big tell here) that doesn’t interchange with the one cars. This is a clearer view of that front emblem:
Great selection William. The E30 looks clean with the hood down, but I prefer the Baur both down and up.
Lovely Lancia.
XR7,
I agree about the lack of rigidity in the E 30. We were looking for a convertible in ’94 and drove the BMW 3 and a new Mustang GT. The GT was a better convertible, faster, quieter and much more rigid. Also, much cheaper! The GT was a great car.
The Fulvia is wonderful, on my bucket list of cars to own someday. I don’t think I’ve ever seen one just parked at the mall, great find! We actually featured the concept car you mentioned here several years, I saw it at the Frankfurt IAA when it was current…
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/uncategorized/carshow-classic-2003-lancia-fulvia-coupe-concept/
No wonder the E30 style is convincing even today: It’s a Claus Luthe design…
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/automotive-histories/automotive-history-the-cars-of-claus-luthe/