Here’s ‘just a car.’ Never did I imagine I would ever stop to take photos of a ’68-’72 Chevy Nova. So familiar a shape throughout my whole life, that to me it was the quintessential idea of ‘ just a car.’ A common sight now uncommon, that now deserves a bit of respect and reflection. Especially in 4-door form, with an owner that prides on its 6-cyl. mill.
Not that these were ever common in El Salvador, where I found it. They certainly were in Puerto Rico, where I spent my childhood and high school years. The island was certainly GM territory, and these Novas were the most frequent of sights. So normal I can’t recall them precisely, but just knew they were part of the landscape.
While these were resilient and sturdy machines, extinction eventually came. As far as I know, these rarely show up on US streets anymore, and are now mainly Sunday rides or belong to auto show displays. With that said, let’s take a look at this surviving sample. A living fossil if you will.
This Nova’s fairly intact mechanicals are probably the result of two factors. First, American iron from this period is somewhat exotic in this region and has a small fan base that covets it. Second, and more likely, constrained finances. Many hands have probably wished for a heart transplant, but the cost is beyond most people’s finances. Hence, its 6-cyl. fossil nature.
Not that I’m claiming it is unmolested. Owners have certainly been creative with this fossil, and it’s far from being a museum piece. I mean, what color was this originally? How many resprays are in there?
In all honesty, I’m assuming this Nova still carries its original 6-cyl. Partly because V-8s were rarely ordered here. Partly because of it being a 4-door. And lastly, because its ‘6-cyl.’ power is proudly plastered all over the car.
Evidence number one: “CHEVY, SIX IN LINE,” right in that rear quarter window. But should I just take one sticker as sole evidence?
Evidence two and three: “230 cu in.” and “3.8” stickers on the trunk lid. I know I may be giving this owner’s testimonial too much favor in my reasoning, but he’s certainly insisting on the point. Also, he’s been kind enough to leave engine size clear regardless of the measuring system.
So there you have it; 230 cu in. equals 3.8 L. That’s one of Chevy’s inline sixes, providing 140hp of pure -modest- fury, and speeding from 0-60 MPH in about 14 sec. Not really what the muscle car crowd cared for, but nowadays probably more exotic than the many SS replicas roaming around.
I’m also taking this owner’s testimonial when it comes to model year. Look, there’s the slim “Chevy II” badge over the grille’s top, which only appeared in ’68. Yes, I’m aware there’s been much tampering with this face. The multitude of lights and the additional ‘Nova’ badge on the grille were never GM options, so I’m taking my chances with that 1968 claim. You’ll also notice there are some rivets on that “Chevy II” badge, but that proves little either way. It’s common practice to secure automotive trim in this nation, and my own car’s badges have been riddled with such rivets since day one.
That “Chevy II” badge was one of the few distinctive changes on the Nova, which had a rather long styling cycle. A sign that something was changing in Detroit and that the annual update tradition was starting to slip by the late ’60s. Launched in ’68, the “Chevy II” Nova remained mostly unmolested for 5 models years, before getting an update for ’73. The “Chevy II” badge was replaced in ’69 with a plain Chevrolet bowtie one, and the model became simply the Nova.
Of course, the Chevy Nova has multiple posts at CC (further below). After all, this was Chevrolet’s entry model, ready to satisfy many needs. A whole Swiss Army knife of possibilities, from humble people hauler to hardcore street racer.
The chief designer for these Chevy II/Novas was Irv Rybicki, with final production models created under the guidance of Henry C. Haga. And in the words of Rybicki, the Chevy II Nova “was an inexpensive car that doesn’t know it’s inexpensive.”
GM and Chevrolet had their styling skills well-honed when these Novas were conceived in the mid-60s. The new Novas had an uncomplicated appearance, with just enough sculpting and rakishness to seem more than they actually were. It spoke the affordable-yet-stylish language well, and it sold like hotcakes, with every year piling on better numbers. No wonder it’s such a familiar shape.
And on this occasion, I prefer that known shape to the styling mockups (above, dating from 1965 to 1966) that gave birth to its final form.
As it was Detroit’s wont, the new ’68 Nova had grown a bit over the previous generation. It was the ‘right size’ package for the time, as the market soon proved. However, by becoming less of a compact ‘compact,’ there was now a bigger opening for the imports. I guess someone at GM thought that was worth a look, as this ‘subcompact’ Chevy II Nova mockup shows.
Growth wasn’t an immediate problem for the Nova, as sales eventually showed. There were 1.3 million Novas built between 1968-72, with 349,733 sold just in 1972. For that last year, 40% of its buyers were women, 75% were coupes, and V-8s made up about 60% of the total.
Elsewhere, the steady growth of American cars was becoming a liability, and they were selling in ever-diminishing numbers. In places like Central America, they were just too cumbersome for local streets, and their fuel consumption was a growing concern. I’ll admit the Nova was a lesser sinner in those regards, but the die had been cast. By the late ’60s, Toyotas and Datsuns had almost taken over the local market.
So Chevys of this age are rare in San Salvador’s streets. For the local fans of these vintage cars, any ol’ Chevy is a good chance to rejoice, no matter its condition. And well, 6-cyl. sounds mighty in a land filled with 1L and 1.2L Korean compacts.
With that in mind, I can easily see the reasons for the owner’s pride in this 6-cyl.
I was about to be scuttled away by the street guard (a never-ending nuisance) just as I was to check out this Nova’s interior. So no idea on this one’s tranny. I would venture to say it has a manual, as that was the norm over here. There was much skepticism on automatics until recently.
Yet, from this shot, we can see the front seats have been replaced, and the license number is a low figure, likely a repurposed registration. That would mean the car spent some time unused before being revived. Good, if that’s the case.
I don’t even know how I feel about finding this Nova. Such a familiar shape of my past, which I hadn’t seen in ages. Yet, once I saw it, it was like all the time in between had never occurred. Have you ever visited your old hometown or school, years apart, and felt as if time had stood still?
Whatever the case, I hope time does stand still for this Nova. Or even better, reverses to a better version of itself. But always keeping that 6-cyl. under the hood. We need more such living fossils in our records.
Further reading:
Curbside Classic: 1970 Chevrolet Nova – Have It Your Way
Curbside Classic: 1969 Plain White Chevrolet Nova – Building a Barer Way To See The USA
When I recently saw the new Mazda CX-90, I was immediately struck by the front fender badges, which read “Inline 6”. I am hard pressed to think of a previous car that had a callout for this engine configuration. Detroit’s cars in the ’50s through ’70s would call out a V8, sometimes with its displacement, but kept quiet about any inline sixes which were assumed to be for those too cheap or stingy to opt for a V8. In the 1980s when four-cylinders became the norm for many cars, “V6” badges became common, and would stay so for decades. But I can’t recall anything with an “inline 6” badge, even though that configuration was used on several cars and trucks such as BMWs, Mercedes, and Jeeps. Some highlighted their displacement, but not the inline 6 configuration.
The Nova got a facelift in 1973 and a more extensive re-engineering and another facelift in 1975, but the basic 1968 car lasted through 1979, with the front doors, front fenders, and interior not changing much.
There were a few American cars from the 1950s and 1960s in which the six-cylinder was called out. Whether or not this was typical, I don’t know but I have seen several early ’60s full-size Chevrolets with an “I6” badge on the front fenders plus similar on mid-60s Novas / Chevy IIs.
Ford also did this to a degree. While I didn’t get a close-up, the blue ’55 Ford found in what is linked below has a badge on the front fender calling out its straight six.
There were also the indirect identifications of them; ’65 Mustangs with no 289 badge on the front fender or Chevrolets for years not having a decorative V somewhere on the hood and/or trunk lid denoted the six bangers.
I agree as there was often no bringing attention to a vehicle having a six.
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/uncategorized/cc-walk-talk-and-travel-sometimes-the-world-is-a-static-place/
American Motors cars of the ’65-69 or so period, sometimes sported ‘232-SIX’ badges. The Gremlins had a decal that didn’t say six, but called out the displacement as ‘3.8 litre’ or ‘4.2 litre’ (the V8 Gremlins were ‘5.0 litre’). Wasn’t the mid-size Rambler sedan the ‘Rambler 6’ before it was renamed ‘Rambler Classic’ for… was it 1960?
Those I6 badges on early to mid 1960’s Chevies indicated the hair shirt 194 C.I. version, a dandy engine for trash/ag pumps and little gen sets but seriously underwhelming for their intended use in the new Chevy II series .
If ever you drove one you’d understand .
All this Chevy II (NOVA was an RPO option) needs to wake it up is a 12 port cylinder head and some side draft carbys .
-Nate
I did a double take on the second picture down…at first glance I thought it had a rear bumper extension, but it’s just the concrete block behind it. 🙂
Count me as a fan of the four door versions of the Nova and the Malibu from this era, if only because they evoke memories of the ‘regular cars’ I saw when I was a kid…very few remain today as the four doors (and station wagons) were more utilitarian; just a vehicle to be used up and thrown away.
The 68-72 Novas were a interesting set of cohesive, and stocky shapes that made for a quite attractive LOOKING car despite its humble underpinnings. The light/medium blue metallic one above was the same color as the ’72 250 c.i. 6 Nova we briefly had. Briefly because it was a California car with more smog equipment bolted onto the 6 than it could handle: the actual 15 mpg HIGHWAY that I got with the car was very di$appointing. A ’73 VW Super Bug soon replaced the Nova.
Rybicki’s claim to the styling of the ’68 Nova/Chevy II is interesting in that one of my 3 excellent ACCD instructor’s, Harry Bradley, seemed to be the “author” of the winning design based on original sketches he managed to “liberate” from the GM studio he was in then.
Of the 4 Nova coupes we had, the second (used) ’69 with the 230 6 and the restyled (altho less than most people would realize) ’79 250 6, 3 on the tree were the best we had of the four. The first (new) ’69 250/6 ate rocker arms repeatedly; so much for a “bullet proof” Chevy 6!
The design did ring Chevy’s $ales bell as the article stated. Therefore a winner for GM, and take your chances for the retail customer. That luck of the draw certainly lead me and many others to 4 wheeled Hondas, Toyotas, etc. DFO
My mother’s first and only new car, a ’71 Nova six, also had squeaky rocker arms. The first set at 8,000 miles. The second set at around 15,000 and, of course, out of warranty.
But, I happened to have read a service bulletin in a ‘Popular Mechanix’ (or something similar) magazine on the “fix”.
You poured a quart of GM Positraction Fluid down the dipstick tube,with the engine running and let it idle for 20 minutes.
This was after changing the oil and filter, leaving it one quart low. Start the engine and bring it to temperature. The Positraction fluid was a thin green liquid and quieted the rockers almost immediately!
Never had another problem with the rockers!
The ‘71 ad “Any Resemblance …” is a not unsubtle copy (or parody??) of VW’s ads of the time.
Of course he’s proud of his six; it could have had the 153 four. 🙂
That’s what the copy ad says in the ’69….”We’re encouraging foreign trades with a Nova 4 sale”. Not too imaginative taking into account that most shoppers weren’t aware of the 4 cylinder…
My father had a 68 Chevy II just like this one, bought in 71 from the……URSS embassy. A few things, you are right in that the front tag was CHEVY II only in 68, but the same goes for the trunk, where this car is carrying a 69 or later “Nova BY CHEVROLET”. The 68’s trunk had a CHEVY II BY CHEVROLET badge.
Of course there are many other telling points that we could use, but none are present.
Front to rear, the 68 had orange directional lenses in front vs clear lenses for 69 (this would change in shape and color several times).
69 and later cars had a NOVA badge in the front fenders, a few inches forward of the front door. The 68 had a similar badge but in the rear fenders, at very end of the car.
Like all GM passenger cars excluding the Corvair (I think) the 68 is the only model year with side marker lights and ignition switch on the dashboard, as for 69 all but the Corvair were prepared for the 70 mandate to have a locking steering column.
On the right side of the dashboard, there was a small shield which also carried a CHEVY II signature, wich in later cars said NOVA.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the wheels are the stock steelies from a final generation, base model S-10 pickup.
I’ve not seen the shots of those clays. The one looks just like the ’68 Chevelle 4-door.
Love the “sub-compact” clay. A preview of the Gremlin.. I would have made an awesome light hot rod.
I have always found the 68-72 Nova/Chevy II an attractive car. And the 4 door was just as good looking as the 2 door.
Those styling studies make me realize that these were designed pretty much in parallel with the 1968 A body cars. How interesting that they considered a roofline on the X body sedan like that on the 1968 A body sedan – one that I have always found quite unattractive. The sedan for the X body, instead, carries the faster roof/C-pillar shape for the A body’s 4 door hardtop. I wonder if the X body sedan was the reason the A body sedan roof is the way it is – so that it didn’t look like a bigger Nova?
Chevy and Ford both tried to incorporate some styling cues from their late-’60s pony cars into their standard compact coupes, but Chevrolet did a much better job incorporating some 1st-gen Camaro styling to the Nova than Ford did putting some Mustang cues onto the late-’60s Falcon, which still looked rather frumpy despite the Mustang influence.
Well, that ol’ CC Effect was up and running today. Soon after catching up on CC this morning, I went out and saw a Chevy II of this vintage, coming towards me on the opposite side of the freeway. Definitely not a resto-mod or even just a resto, it looked crustier than this one but still freeway capable. It was a two door though.
IMO, the 1968-72 Nova is a handsome car, whether it’s a 2-door or 4-door.
Here’s a 1972 SS that I see semi-regularly near me (I have no idea if it’s a clone/tribute or the real thing).
My parents had a ’69 Nova 4-door, 230 6cyl, powerglide in the early 80’s. Very nice car. Dependable and a pleasure to drive. A few years later my wife’s uncle died leaving behind a mint original owner 1970 Nova 4-door with only 25k on the clock. Same 230 & powerglide as my parent’s. No one else in her family wanted it, so we bought it. Loved that little car. Sold it in 1989 and have regretted it ever since! 😕
I’m surprised to see rear-seat shoulder belts on the Chevy II options list. How many people were even using front seat shoulder belts in 1968? (the year they became required in cars sold in US, but often complied with by a separate roof-mounted strap that many ignored).
It’s interesting how much the front end of the shortened Nova proposal looks like the later Buick Apollo version.
Here’s a photo of my 4door
Hi Craig, images for the comments section have to be in JPEG format and no more than 1800 pixels wide by 1000 pixels high for them to upload. Good luck!
I owned a ‘68 Nova with a 307 V8, 4 speed and a bench seat. Pretty good car, all in all.