As I wrap up “Oshkosh Week,” let’s take a brief look at another area where automobiling and aviation cross over: powerplants.
The ratio of power to weight is important in automobiles, but even more so in aircraft. The Wright brothers were unable to source an auto engine of sufficient horsepower and light enough weight for the 1903 Flyer, so they had their shop mechanic, Charlie Taylor, design and build one from scratch. Lacking spark plugs, a fuel pump, carburetor or even a throttle, the engine did innovate in one area: it had an aluminum block, a first for any engine used in an aircraft. This engine developed 12 hp at 1,090 rpm and weighed 170lb (77kg), which works out to about 14lb/hp.
Only 26 years after the Flyer first flew, Bernard Pietenpol published plans for his two-seat Air Camper, which could be built using locally scrounged materials and powered with the widely available (in 1929!) Model A engine. The cast-iron blocked Model A engine weighed 244lb (110kg) in aero trim and developed 35hp at 1,600 rpm, which equates to about 7lb/hp.
Plans are still available for the Air Camper, and it’s probably one of the most versatile airframes ever, with over 30 known engine types having been used by builders over the years.
After Chevrolet introduced the Corvair, Bernard built two different Piets using this engine, and really liked the performance improvement. The Corvair engine (adapted for aero use) has quite a following, with numerous horsepower upgrades and dedicated web sites for conversions. A typical installation will weigh around 220lb (100kg) and make a reliable 100-120hp, which works out to around 2lb/hp. The Corvair engine has been used in well over a dozen different aircraft types, and is a good, low-cost substitute where less than 120hp is required.
The Suzuki-sourced Chevy/Geo Tracker and Metro engines have also found a following among homebuilders. The three cylinder engine produces around 62hp at 140lb (64kg), which is about 2.26lb/hp, and the four cylinder comes in around 90hp at 168lb (76kg), or around 1.9lb/hp. The P-38 replica above is powered by a pair of belt-driven Metro engines.
One particularly interesting engine aero conversion happened not long after WWII (1946), when the Crosley COBRA (COpper – BRAzed tin) engine, making all of 25hp, was adapted for use in the prototype Mooney Mite. In auto trim, the engine weighed about 133lb (60kg), for a power to weight ratio of 5.32hp/lb.
The example shown above has been repowered with a Lycoming engine and was involved in a crash in 1950. The owner still has the factory receipt for the aircraft rebuild, which cost $1,182.00.
One would think the COBRA engine would be better suited to aero than auto use, given that an aero engine runs for long periods at constant power settings (which were the design criteria for the COBRA), but the engine proved unreliable in the Mite, and the twelve (or possibly seven – sources disagree) initial production aircraft were all repowered to Lycoming or Continental aero engines, which greatly improved performance and reliability.
Taking a look at the boxer “four” family, the Subaru engine is another popular power option for homebuilders. With the EA81 engine weighing in at around 185lb (84kg), they make a reliable 70hp, or 2.64lb/hp. There’s a huge fan base for these engines, with a ready supply of parts and cores to work from.
Finally, we’ll take a short look at the auto engine that’s probably been adapted to the most number of airframes over the years, the aircooled VW Type 1 engine. There’s such a variety of upgrades to these engines, it’s really hard to pin down a typical weight and hp rating.
I’ll use this WWI Nieuport 11 replica (which belongs to my friend Dick Starks of the world-renowned Kansas City Dawn Patrol), powered by an 1,835cc Type I engine as an example. These will typically weigh in around 150-160lb (73kg) and make around 60hp or so, or 2.5lb/hp. The Type I engine can be pushed up close to 2,500cc and 80+hp. Coupled with a reduction drive and a honkin’ big prop, it will really pull you along!
At the other end of the VW spectrum are “half-VW” engines, weighing in at a featherweight 87lb (39.4kg) and making a shade over 35hp, or 2.49lb/hp. This particular installation is in a legal FAA Part 103 ultralight (the aircraft empty weight must be 254lb or less).
In this Capsule, I’ve only tried to cover the more popular auto-to-aero engine conversions, and other than this brief mention, haven’t considered the reverse angle of aero-to-auto conversions such as the Franklin engine used in the Tucker.
Aircraft builders, and particularly homebuilders are always searching for the right balance of low weight, good horsepower, reliability and economy. Cost is a factor, too, especially as you get closer to the ultralight scale aircraft, but as my flying buddy always says, “I didn’t get into aviation to save money!”
For many, an auto engine conversion is just the ticket.
Very nice. I’ve often thought the BMW boxer twin would make a nice light-weight plane engine; quite powerful, and very reliable.
Another idea that never got off the ground: the ZL-1 Chevy big-block based Thunder engine, making 600 hp with twin turbos, and designed to replace the PT 6 turboprop as a more fuel-efficient alternative.
Weren’t the Chevy engines the ones used in the Vickers Vimy replica (since repowered with BMW engines, I believe)?
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/vimy/index.html
The world has changed a lot… Now turboprops are the hot item for just about anything bigger than about 400hp. The reliability and long time between TBO, plus the use of cheaper and more widely available Jet A has made the PT-6 a formidable choice.
If you want to build something Ed, I have a pile of VW engine parts.
So do I… (c:
Nice article …. and what a great way to link the technology. I love the Mooney Mite and am jonesing for one … Can’t imagine how the 25 hp Crosley engine would have powered the thing …. the 65 hp Continental that replaced it makes it a pocket rocket ,,, but the 100 hp would be even better. 🙂
Darn you Aircraft Enthuasists driving up my cost of Subaru replacement engines! 🙂
Good Stuff. Do you have any examples of the EJ 2.2 & 3.3L engines used in early Legacies and the SVX used in aircraft?
I’m sure they’re out there… A lot of conversions came about because that’s what the builder had easy (or cheap) access to.
I wonder if the Ford Model T engine ever got any aircraft use. I would think that the simple magneto ignition of the T would have been a natural for aircraft application, although the engine’s horsepower rating was quite a bit lower than the Model A’s.
The Pietenpol site indicated that some Air Campers were powered with T engines, so yes.
I wouldn’t mind seeing articles on airplane engines that weren’t automotive related. This was so interesting….keep it coming.
Thank you Ed for sharing your Oshkosh trip with us. That was awesome! Your love of aviation and engines is infectious and fun. When I flew for a regional, many pilots, including me, got so negative all the time about management, the union, how bad our lines for that month sucked, etc. that it was all too easy to forget how fun the job could be. And when we did get time off, most of us spent it away from airports and aviation. I, for one, was tired of hotels, tired of living out of a rollerboard, and tired of TSA and just spent my time off home with my family.
Thank you for reminding me of how fun General Aviation can be. Great job Ed!
Very interesting article. Thanks
What? No Curtiss Jenny JN-4’s? I’m VERY disappointed…
The OX-5 wasn’t a car engine! The Jenny is my all-time favorite aircraft, though, so maybe I’ll have to queue it up sometime.
Interesting article. I suppose an engine’s aviation hp rating would be on the conservative side from what you could tune it to outright, eg in race trim, otherwise my Imp engine would be about 1.4 lb/hp – not bad from an early 60’s engine.
I gather the Subaru EA ohv engine is about 10kg lighter than an EJ ohc. How much lighter are engines in aero trim vs auto?
I had always heard that Porsche engines were used in some aircraft so I did a little research. Seems that they gave up on the Porsche PFM 3200. Are any still flying? Does anyone try to use and Porsche engines anymore. Seems that power/weight ratio could be great. Thanks for a nice article and series.
The Mooney-Porsche was a flop. It really didn’t offer any advantages over the old Lycoming power plants. One of the problems with most car engines is that they need a reduction gearbox because you can’t really spin most props past 2700 RPM or so before noise goes way up and efficiency goes way down. With everything required, the Porsche powered Mooney actually weighed 200 lbs more than the standard Mooney 201. Though the Porsche engine got way more power per cubic inch, displacement is not a great predictor of engine weight.
I think there may be some Mooney Porsches still flying but Porsche doesn’t offer much support. It turns out that the old-fashioned Lycoming 320 ci flat-4 with 200 hp is lighter by a fair amount.
The PFM3200 was probably smoother, though. 🙂
A GM350 HO ZZ3 350 V-8 powering a 2/3 scale Mustang.
http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/aircraft-for-sale/TITAN-T51-MUSTANG/TITAN-T51-MUSTANG/1183125.htm
I’ve heard of someone using a 350 in a P-40 warhawk replica, but can’t find one on the ‘Net.
Good basic article, many omissions of course.
Just out of interest, what is the ‘water cooled’ flat six shown in the last black and white photo?
Or is that the Tucker/Franklin?
Yep, It’s the Tucker engine.