It’s the weekend! Time to trawl through the classified ads again. Last week, we looked at used Volkswagens on Craigslist. This week, let’s look at some desirable Volvos.
We can’t look at used Volvos without looking at the archetypal Volvo: a blocky old station wagon. Here’s a ’92 240 wagon, one of the last of its kind.
The 200-series Volvos were supposed to be supplanted by the 700-series range in 1982 but steady sales and loyal customers meant Volvo ended up giving the 200 a decade-long stay of execution, even though its bones dated back to the 1966-vintage 140-series.
Though the 200-series had been available with turbo and V6 engines, by the time this 240 rolled out of the Torslanda factory the only available engine was a 2.3 four-cylinder producing 114 hp and 136 ft-lbs. It was mated to either a four-speed automatic or, as in this 240, a five-speed manual.
Upholding Volvo’s reputation for safety, all 1992 240s came standard with anti-lock disc brakes and a driver’s airbag. In terms of creature comforts, you’ll find power windows and locks, air-conditioning and heated power mirrors.
Though most 200-series Volvos were sedans, the wagons were quite popular. Bizarrely, however, I never seem to see any of the wagons here in Brisbane.
If you’re buying an old Volvo, a wagon just feels right. This 240 has a few issues like a malfunctioning speedometer, some light rust, and a rear hatch that doesn’t lock. But these are well-regarded as being sturdy cars and it’s listed for only $1200. It does have almost 300,000 miles on the odometer, though…
Here’s something you don’t see often nowadays: a regular station wagon with a third row. Unless you’re in Europe, you probably don’t see many station wagons, period. The 940 was an evolution of the 700-series platform and, for a brief period of time in the early 1990s, the 200, 700 and 900 series Volvos were all sold alongside each other. This 940 has the turbocharged 2.3 four with 162 hp and 195 ft-lbs.
That third row doesn’t look especially comfortable but a lot of modern crossovers have lousy third rows, too, with a lot less legroom. What you won’t find on any modern crossovers is styling quite this straight-edged. Nor will you find any with such a big greenhouse, the 940’s interior being bright and airy with excellent visibility.
Volvo has long enjoyed a reputation for two things: safety and comfortable seats. The leather thrones in this 940 look extremely cushy and comfortable.
Personally, I’d rather a six-cylinder 960 as these 940 Turbos suffered from a bit of lag. There was little difference in fuel economy, either, while the six-cylinder matched the turbo in torque and produced an extra 40 hp. But this 940 Turbo looks nice and clean, if a little high mileage with 279,000 miles on the odometer. The asking price is $3500.
Perhaps you want a Volvo wagon but need something a little safer, more modern and better in the snow. How about this 2006 Volvo V50 T5 AWD?
I’ve always had a soft spot for these. What’s not to love? The turbocharged five-cylinder has a throaty hum and produces 217 hp and 236 ft-lbs so, though it weighs around 500 pounds more than the 240, it’ll be much quicker off the line. It’ll handle better, too, thanks to the C1 platform shared with the Mazda3.
It mightn’t have that bluff, tank-like charm of the old RWD Volvos but the V50’s airbag count is considerably higher than the 240’s with front side and full-length curtain airbags. There’s also heated seats, a moonroof and satellite navigation.
It’s smaller than the aforementioned Volvos but it’s clean inside and out, has the comfortable seats you’d expect of a Volvo, and is a great way to thumb your nose at everybody else’s crossovers. This V50 is listed at $5995 and it has less than 100,000 miles on the odometer.
Yeah, I know Volvo made cars other than wagons. Nevertheless, Volvo’s wagons are just so cool that I simply must show you another. This is a ’97 850 R, basically the 850 T5-R with a new name and a different paint job. The lurid Cream Yellow of the ’96 T5-R was replaced with a choice of red or black but otherwise it’s the same car.
That includes the 2.3 turbocharged five-cylinder engine, producing 240 hp and 221 ft-lbs. Unfortunately, all US-market T5-R and R models came only with a four-speed automatic; a five-speed manual was available elsewhere.
With an 850 R, you’ll get sub-7 second 0-60 times but a harsh, stiff ride. You’ll also get a faithful yet modern interpretation of classic Volvo wagon styling and a cavernous cabin, plus some lovely leather-and-Alcantara seats.
With this particular 850 R, listed at $5000, you’ll also get a car that’s clearly been loved by its owner. That’s not to say he hasn’t driven it hard but his ad is much more thoughtful and detailed than the typical Craigslist ad. Bonus points, too, for fitting the whole car in frame in photographs. A lot of Craigslisters can’t seem to get that right!
If you want to get a modern Volvo, though, why not go the whole nine yards? Here’s a 2010 Volvo S80 with the Yamaha-designed 4.4 V8 and all-wheel-drive. It’s fully-loaded with heated, ventilated and massaging front seats, satellite navigation, real wood trim, and, most interestingly, an interior heartbeat sensor to let you know if somebody’s hiding in your back seat. Volvo engineers must’ve been reading too many chain emails…
Producing 311 hp and 325 ft-lbs, the S80 V8 was even more powerful than the athletic S60 and V70 R models. Not that you’d know it by looking at it. The S80 V8 was not only conservative by mid-size luxury sedan standards, it was also scarcely differentiated from less powerful S80s.
On the plus side, that means there’s nothing to mar the elegant Scandinavian interior. Nor is there anything to distract from Todd Levy’s subtler interpretation of the first-generation S80’s broad-shouldered styling. Nobody will know you’ve got a V8 Volvo until you put the pedal to the metal. The Yamaha V8 is as sonorous as you’d expect it to be.
Although the adaptive dampers keep body motions in check and the V8 races the S80 to 60mph in around 6.5 seconds, some critics took issue with the S80’s somewhat recalcitrant transmission. Nevertheless, the S80 was plenty athletic and a highly desirable flagship Volvo. It’s also the lowest mileage Volvo here with 83,000 miles, though it’s the most expensive at $11,995.
I’ve commented before that Volvo should’ve put the Yamaha V8 under the hood of the mechanically-related V70. A V70 V8 would’ve been a fitting end for this week’s CC Classifieds as we’ve progressively increased horsepower with each Volvo wagon. It also would’ve made for my dream Volvo. Nevertheless, the S80 V8 is my pick for this week with the V50 T5 a close runner-up. Which Volvo appeals to you?
Related Reading:
CC Capsule: 2006-10 Volvo S80 V8 – Swedish Power Metal
Curbside Loaner Service: 2006 Volvo V50 Wagon – A Really Swede Ride
Curbside Classics: 1991-1998 Volvo 940/960 – Playing It Safe
Curbside Classic: 1993 Volvo 240 Classic Wagon – So Long, Old Friend
CC Capsule: 1995 Volvo 850 T-5R – A Rare Yellow Bird With A Touch Of Porsche
The S80 V8 for sure. As much as I love bricks, the V8 remains one of my dream cars
The 245, without a doubt. Robust build quality, utilitarian and so handy, manual transmission – what more could you ask for?!
I respect the redblock bricks but don’t have enough emotional or nostalgic attachment to them to put up with 114hp, 300K miles, and advancing rust. I don’t think the V8 S80 is going to feel special enough to put up with the running costs. The 850R is tempting, but a stanced performance *Volvo wagon* isn’t sitting right with me for some reason. I’ll go with the V50. I like the size, and I like the sound of 5 cylinder engines.
The 850 with the v8 is 2nd. I love the 850 in general, but the Yamaha v8 is delightful. I had a boss with a V8 XC 90 great car. I had a p2 xc70 but would have preferred an R.
Also I’m pretty sure the r with a manual was available stateside. Had a customer with a black one with a manual.
None of these. Give me the P1800 anyday
+1
After the passing of a family member, I was offered a well looked-after V50 a couple of years ago. I quite liked the seats, but sadly that was as far as it went. I wouldn’t want any Volvo newer than an Amazon or an 1800ES.
That S80 looks like a decent enough ride. I drove an S60 once, just for a short spin. It was a very nice car, drove very well, lots of nice luxury and safety features.
The one with the rear facing third seat looks like a motion sickness generator. No thanks on that one.
I too pick none of them and choose the 144. My brother had one that wasn’t in very good shape, but it still felt like a solid car. It even overheated on the way to Laguna Seca, we finally were able to botch a repair and didn’t have anymore problems with it after that.
I like all of them, and I RESLLY like the S80, but for me it would have to be the R.
My dad had a T-5R and it was simply awesome. Only the first generation Audi S4 Avant (the A4-based one, not the 100-based one) really matches that right-sized Q-ship look of these 850s.
240 wagon with a 5-speed, oh yes…
Known as a north shore Valiant in Sydney those old Volvos used to be everywhere holding up traffic, the 245 wagons were probably their best effort, but no I dont want one and fortunately they are quite rare in going order around here.
The 245. We bought one new in 1985, four speed manual with electric overdrive. It was one solid car that brought more than asking price within hours of listing it for sale 10 years down the road.
Easy, I would have a 960 wagon. I very nearly bought one (dark green with tan interior) after borrowing a neighbor’s 940 wagon and really liking it. A gear head friend put an SBC into a 240 sedan and it was stupid fun, so I considered a 240 wagon for a bit, but all the 2-series wagons I found were either pretty rusty, sky high mileage, surprisingly expensive, or all 3… and lots of the 9-series were starting to get there as well. Oh, and having to replace a heater core in one of these, could easily justify junking the car instead… “two guys at the factory would hold up s heater core, and the rest of the workers wrap the car around it.” I loved the actual 960 I was testing, but the seller disclosed that it had “intermittent electrical issues” so I ended up passing on it. But I still think that car is “Peak Wagon”.
There used to be a guy in Maine who specialized in putting Ford 5.0’s into Volvos, normally wagons. I think he was focused on the 700 series, but likely did 900’s as well. Talk about a great combo.
Converse Engineering. The did 900’s as well. In fact if you watch the Comedians in Card getting Coffee with David Letterman episode, he has Jerry drive his 960 V8 around.
So much goodness here!
My preferred order would probably be:
960 Turbo
S80 V8
850R
245
V50
Although the spread is extremely narrow between all five for me, I can justify any one of them almost as much as the next and the V50 wouldn’t be significantly less desirable than the 960T. No dogs in this crowd.
As a current C30 owner, I wish the article had included one of those..,
I’d lean toward the S80 – but as I tell everyone who is considering a used Volvo, make sure it has all the maintenance records and preferably was serviced by a Volvo dealer. If it hasn’t, you’re likely to have some fairly constant and expensive repair bills.
My dream car is a white P1800 just like Simon Templar’s…
I had two seven series Volvos (1987 740 GLE, and a 1986 760 Turbo). I always hankered for a wagon. So a 240 or a 740 wagon will do. But that 850 T5 would be my top pick.
I don’t have to to choose. My daily driver is a near twin to to the 940 above.Turbo automatic, no third seat. great visibility, huge loadspace. Hard to break, easy to fix. Single and mostly retired, I can probably keep it running for the rest of my driving life. Someone above mentioned the difficulty of heater core replacement. I quit driving my old S-10 work truck in cold weather because the core went and replacement involved the usual “remove the dashboard.” Can anyone name a vehicle made in the last 30 years with an easy heater core replacement?
The 940.
I like big box and I cannot lie…
I can never own a Volvo
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cars-of-a-lifetime/coal-1984-oldsmobile-delta-88-moms-car/
940 wagon for me. Always liked them; almost bought a new one (early 740 turbo). But they’re all getting mighty old. The forces of entropy cannot be contained, even in an old Volvo. Something is going to break, and break, and break…
Looks like I’m in trouble. So many to choose from, so I went with “all of the above” – honest – here’s my stable of current drivers: 67 P210 Duett wagon, 82 245 turbo wagon, 98 V90 wagon, and 10 XC70 T6 wagon. Best all-round car: the 2010. Best boulevard cruiser: the 98. Cult favorite: the 82 Brick. Chick magnet: the 67 Baloney wagon. Same corporate lineage but completely different personalities. I’m certifiable, but I understand that…
If it weren’t for the price….
Volvo S90 S90 serie 7 clase S
https://auto.mercadolibre.com.uy/MLU-462527012-volvo-s90-mercedes-benz-s-bmw-740-serie-5-permuto-audi-_JM
None of the above for me.
The only Volvos I would consider is a PV544 and a P1800.
Another vote for the 240 wagon with 5 speed.
Ideally speaking, I would like either an Amason or a 1800ES. However, if you held a gun to my head and forced me to choose one of these offerings, I would easily take the professor-grade 240 wagon. It’s fresh hipster bait!
I owned a ’96 850R wagon in the same red color with a beige interior. When it ran – which wasn’t always – it was almost the perfect vehicle. I could fit loads of yard waste in bags or bikes with the seat down and haul ass at the same time. Very comfortable seats as well. However, the car was also major pain to keep running – oil leaks galore, electronic glitches, the front air dam is so low that it breaks when you park at the local supermarket, seat rips, etc. I loved and hated the car at the same time and finally sold it after 4 years when the repair bills just got too much. But I loved the whoosh on takeoff from the turbo.
Definitely the 240 wagon and the 850 wagon.