My first post on high mileage vehicles for sale was so popular I’ve decided to make it a semi-regular feature, and I’ve even given it a name: Who Wants to be a Mileage Millionaire!
There was some discussion among the commenters about the over-representation of trucks and commercial vehicles in my first post. The reason for the preponderance of trucks in high mileage vehicles boils down to mission: The purpose of a truck is to carry stuff, while the purpose of a car is to carry people. Simply put, parcels rarely complain about flattened seat cushions, non-functional A/C, sloppy steering or squeaks and rattles, while passengers (and drivers) typically do. A high mileage truck is simply more capable of fulfilling its intended function (so long as it runs) than a high mileage automobile.
But we are not here to talk about trucks today. JP Cavanaugh (among others) pointed out the lack of American cars on my first list, so armed only with a web browser I decided to seek out the highest mileage American branded cars for sale in the US. Lastly, since Curbside Classic is an international concern, I’ve decided to post mileage figures in both miles and kilometers.
Let’s get started with Who Wants to be a Mileage Millionaire!
2006 Ford Focus SES – 345,611 Miles (556,207 km) – $1,593
While these posts are fun to read (and write), I believe that there are deeper truths that can be gleaned from these geriatric cars, especially if we are looking to get a car for ourselves with the highest potential for maximum life. Take this Focus: As a 2006 model, it represents the tail end of the first-generation Focus. This seems to be a common characteristic of high-mileage cars I have seen: They are often from late in the production run, when most of the issues have been sorted out. Several other cars on this list are from late in their production runs.
In researching this post, I have come away impressed with just how durable the interiors of modern vehicles are. Sure, these high mileage cars are dirty and worn, but seldom do I see a torn seat, broken hardware, a sagging headliner, or other signs of aging that were common a generation ago.
Even the Odometer still works!
2009 Buick Lucerne CXL – 361,267 Miles (584,402 km) – $4,995
It is amazing what a good detailing and a wide camera shot will do to a car. Heck, it could be mistaken for brand new! At $4,995, it is a bargain! Or is it?
I often wonder what kind of logic goes into pricing the ultra-high mileage cars. Maybe the reasoning it that because it has survived this long that it has somehow developed some sort of immunity to failure? If so, then this is flawed logic. Any financial advisor will tell you that past performance is no indication of future gain. By that logic, since I was alive yesterday and the day before, if we extrapolate that trend line, I should live forever.
The CXL was the mid-range Lucerne in 2009, and probably stickered for around $35,000. This would have been in the depths of the Great Recession, so let’s assume that there was at least five grand on the hood, and the sale price was $30K. This is an astonishing 16% residual on a ten-year-old, 361,000-mile car (assuming the seller actually gets the $5K asking price).
2005 Chevrolet Impala – 368,881 Miles (594,656 km) – $1,999
Lesson number 2: When it comes to ultra-high mileage cars, simplicity rules. You will not see a Cadillac anywhere on this list: Electrical and mechanical failures from their many geegaws and doodads typically slay these cars before long they reach this mileage level. Now take a look at this Impala: Manual air conditioning, manual seat adjustments, and a good old fashioned ignition key. I half expected to see manual crank windows.
Lesson number 3. Use proven technology. As a 2005 model, this Impala is the last model year of its production run. The W-platform underneath this Impala traces its origins back to the Clinton administration, while the 3.4L 12V V6 dates back to that of Jimmy Carter.
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier – 426,189 Miles (685,884 km) – No Price
This one honestly surprised me. While there is no odometer photo, I did confirm the mileage via CarFAX. There are so many reasons for a Cavalier not to last 15 years, much less with this many miles. Being essentially disposable cars, Cavaliers just weren’t designed to last this long. And then there is the grim reaper that eventually stalks all cars: Depreciation. Chevy Cavaliers, like most compact cars not having an “H” or “T” on the hood, depreciated rapidly. It is no surprise that the selling dealer had not yet listed a price (and yes it is a dealer, not a private seller), because, in my opinion, this car has essentially no value.
Even more unusual, this car is a two-door coupe. Coupes are about the least practical body style, and are typically more about carrying their passengers in style than they are about raw utility. Since this price range is usually about utility and basic transportation, ultra high mileage cars tend to wear much more practical clothes.
2003 Ford Taurus SE – 432,989 miles (696,812 km) – $2,484
So here we are, the highest mileage American branded car that I could find for sale in the US. This is the only photo from the ad, but the CarFAX confirms the mileage.
I was honestly not expecting to see automobiles for sale with mileage figures this high, but if any car can do it, this one can. By the time Ford did a modest refresh of the DN101 Taurus in 2000, most of the bugs had been worked out. This one has the 12V Vulcan V6: Like most of the cars on this list, pushrods rule the high mileage roost. Indeed, many examples of the fourth generation Taurus are still plying the roads today.
I took a look on autotrader and found two cars for sale in Canada in the 400,000 plus km range. An 80s era BMW and a Mercedes. I love reading the sales script for these claiming the virtues of all these cars. Runs well! Lady driven! The straight to the point ones are better. Motor knocks. Brakes failed.
I found a 2003 Chev Trailblazer claiming 3 million kms, but I dismiss it as a typo, or an exaggeration.
I came across this one also, at 878,000, but it is a former Limo I believe, so probably should not count.
https://www.autotrader.ca/ico/lincoln/town%20car/north%20york/ontario/19_11161404_/?showcpo=ShowCpo&ncse=no&orup=74_15_1209&pc=L5N7W1&sprx=100
I just did the same, and found quite a bit, including a very clean looking W123 300D. Personally, I’d have a high mileage Volvo or Mercedes, if only for the cool grille badges they give you for high mileage. I found tons of stuff with clear typos for the mileage, but a few decent looking higher mileage cars.
Personally, while my parents have talked me out of buying a car for the time being, I love just browsing Autotrader and Kijiji.
I also agree, I vastly prefer a detailed ad, even if it goes over the faults of the car, instead of just “In great shape!”. As well, I cannot stand when people say things like “fully loaded” when clearly there are plenty of options missing. (Example: Infiniti G35 sedans without the Premium and Nav packages).
This is an interesting list, partly because of what we do not see: those cars that everyone says rack up insanely high miles, Ford Panthers and GM B bodies. That said, I know a guy who has owned a couple of Buicks and who has run up impressive miles on them. Until he retired he drove a lot for work and if memory serves, he got two of them to about 350k.
I’ll bet that cars that go this distance spend a lot of time on interstate highways. There is no kind of driving easier on a car than mile after mile at steady speed and fully warmed up. It is short trips in the city that kill a car. I have bought two used cars that were approaching 200k (a 96 Honda Odyssey and a 99 Chrysler minivan). Both were inexpensive, in extremely good condition and had spent much of their lives on the highway.
Insanely high miles like this might also be an indicator that an individual car has been one of the best of its breed – the extreme high end of the quality bell curve. If the car had been a problem for an owner it would have been ditched long before it got to miles like these.
I’m surprised to see as many bigger cars as this on the list; compact cars are the go-to for messenger services that rack up some truly high mileages.
Back when overnight film developing was a thing, Konica had a service the store I worked at used; they used Ford Escort (CT20) wagons with manual transmissions and retired them at half a million mostly highway miles.
I would suspect that the best high-mile cars come from salesmen who cover wide territories over rural interstate highways. These guys live in the same car for extended periods, and if it is privately owned have an incentive to maintain it really well. Messenger cars would seem more urban to me, and if they are provided for use by employees, well this would be a recipe for abuse in my experience. But then your experience shows that such a thing could work.
Well the reason we aren’t seeing any high mile Panthers is that once they reach 350-500k miles they just aren’t worth that much. Part of that is due to the fact that there are still lots of them out there with only 150-200k and they only bring $1500.
404k on a Town Car. And at $2500 it still seems optimistic.
https://kansascity.craigslist.org/ctd/d/shawnee-mission-2011-lincoln-town-car/6942343739.html
As I expected an L the factory stretched version.
The taxi companies grabbed all the Panther cars from the auction already-they never make the dealers.
I had a 1997 Cavalier that went to 265K miles when I took it off the road in 2016. The car was so rusty that I was afraid to touch it, lest I get tetanus from it. The drive train was fine. It was the 2.2L pushrod motor with the 4T40 trans behind it; it never missed a beat.
FWIW, I don’t think what kills Cavaliers is planned obsolescence or being a disposable car. Typically, they were purchased for cheap, by cheap owners, many of them do the minimum (or less) to keep them on the road. When a major repair comes up, they typically just abandon ship for more car payments. You could say this about any small domestic or Korean car; the resale values hurt them the most.
Around here it is mostly structural subframe rot that takes J-bodies off the road. The engines/transmissions last just fine, barring some issues with the Quad4 motor and some valvetrain stuff on the early Ecotecs.
That Lucerne COULDN’T have been running a Northstar, could it?
“That Lucerne COULDN’T have been running a Northstar, could it?”
Nope – only 3 portholes – I believe the V8 models got 4.
The 2009 came with 2 engines a 3.9 and the Northstar. Despite the engine fixes, in my opinion luxury cars in general don’t age well.
According to Wikipedia:
Starting in model year 2004.5, the head bolts were once again replaced, this time using GM’s small-block V8 “LS6” head bolts, which were longer than the originals but also crucially had a coarser thread with superior grip.[3] This effectively mitigated the issue, making the 2005-2011 Northstar V8s no more prone to head gasket failure than other production aluminum V8 engines; these Northstars are the most desirable versions for their longevity and reliability
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northstar_engine_series
I sometimes see cars with insanely high mileage that according to the internet shouldn’t have made it that far. It makes me question if many of the problem areas the internet highlight aren’t as bad as they are made out to be. Car that sell well gets lots of press when they have problems, while less popular cars problems fly under the radar.
Common internet complaints people make:
Camry V-6 sludge problems
Focus DCT
Subaru head gasket
Northstar head gasket
Honda minivan transmissions
Chrysler minivan transmissions
I can vouch for the Honda minivan tranny problem. We bought the first “big” Honda Odyssey new in 1999. It very quickly became clear these had transmission failures around 60k. Right on time at 58k, ours failed. Fortunately, Honda had stepped up and warrantied them up to 120k. We got a free (rebuilt) transmission, and kept it till 115k. At that point the power sliding doors were groaning and we were coming up on the end of the extended warranty, and so we did not wish to tempt fate.
Alan my roommate’s Honda Odyssey ate it’s tranny too. Took her a while to pay that repair off and as soon as she did, it was traded for a Prius. Otherwise it gave no trouble that I was told about.
You can add Nissan’s fragile CVT transmission to that list. But looking at the overall reliability of this sample is NOT confidence inspiring either. I doubt any of NIssan’s products will achieve the high mileages we see here without major work at some point.
I can’t seem to edit my post…
I’d be curious to know where that Cavy is…
Looks like it’s located in High Point, North Carolina.
That would explain the lack of rot.
Great series Tom. One of the reasons cars with ultra high mileage often look in very good condition is because the owners maintained them meticulously while getting them there. I owned a Dodge Shadow through the 90s and I accumulated 345,000 kms. From day one I always used synthetic oil, quality parts, and performed preventative maintenance. Original 2.2 litre engine and transmission for the duration, and never had a major repair. And still looked great near the end, winter driven in salt country.
I think in the past, what really separated many domestic cars and their Japanese counterparts was the domestics cars could not withstand the abuse/neglect that many cars receive. That’s why when I read about someone blaming a manufacturer for a car that expires prematurely besides defects, my first inquiry is usually, how well the owners(s) took care of their car. In the hands of attentive non-abusive owners, most any modern car can get to ultra mileage status.
Where are all the German luxury cars????????
Those are coming in a future post. This post was solely about American cars.
I would like to have that Cavalier just as a conversation piece. I bet it spent most of it’s life on the Interstate and it has a manual transmission. Where is it at?
That’s 28,412 miles a year for 15 years, so that mileage isn’t unreasonable. I did that kind of commuting mileage myself. I just didn’t keep them that long.
Found it!
https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/l-Used-Chevrolet-Cavalier-Greensboro-d608_L25079#listing=248524667
A Honda dealer no less. I mean who is going to go to a Honda dealer looking for a 15 year old used Chevrolet???
I’m sure it’s a trade-in, and more than likely will soon be off to the auction block.
There are some dealers here who seem to list everything they have in inventory on their websites, even if they have no intention of putting it out on the lot for sale. Not sure why, maybe it’s just the way their system works, or maybe they figure if someone really wants it they’ll call and maybe they can make a deal.
We have one, our local Hyundai dealer will throw anything on their website and see what happens. They currently have a 2003 Chrysler Town & Country listed for $577. Heck, I think their dealer doc fee is more than that. But man, you cruise around to where they keep the bottom feeders and it’s stiff you wouldn’t even see at a BHPH lot.
https://www.mycrossroadshyundai.com/used-inventory/index.htm?utm_source=MaxConnect&utm_medium=Search&utm_content=Sitelinks&utm_term=%2Bcrossroads%20%2Bhyundai&utm_campaign=MaxConnect_Brand
Looking at the CarFax is illuminating. Apparently someone FINANCED this at around 359,000 miles and then it was back on the lot 20 months later…
https://www.carfax.com/VehicleHistory/p/Report.cfx?vin=1G1JC12FX47304302&partner=CDM_O
I got to wonder just how beat up that Impreza Outback is for it to be priced that cheap for the miles and area and no surprise no pictures of that one. They do have a lot of cars that would go straight to wholesale at most new car stores. But if you don’t have a captive transportation lot or good wholesalers/BHPH lots you can sell directly to might as well throw them on the website and see if you can bring in a little extra profit. Maybe a repeat customer too if they walk out and stay reasonably happy.
Here’s a link to the Cavalier. As of now, it still does not have a price.
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/detail/782298151/overview/
It could be free with purchase of a (any) new Honda. 🙂
I love these high mileage articles, thank you!
Currently sat in my 1995 Landrover Defender. 300tdi engine with mechanical injection pump and 177k miles on it. 100k with me behind the wheel. A fair achievement here in the salty, rainy UK. Never burns a drop of oil or coolant.
Great parts availability and simple fixes will keep it living for a long time to come barring a major accident or political changes around Diesel engines.
I took a peek at bytbil.com and blocket.se (swedish car sale sites) and found a couple of american branded high milage cars, 300k miles are not rare for the 6,5 diesel Suburbans. Saw 2 Town Cars with more than 300k too.
This Volvo however has approx 400k miles, asking price $4500
https://www.blocket.se/jonkoping/Volvo_xc70_d5_86249807.htm?ca=11&w=3
My ’01 Yukon Denali with only around 265k miles is a low miles car compared to that.
I’m not surprised these cars exist, outliers always do.
What *does* surprise me, however, is that several of them seem to be on the lots of new car dealers. I would have thought they’d have gone straight to the auction.
I’ll have to keep you informed in the future if CC is still around. My 91 626 is near the end of the first FWD generation with a proven engine and 5 spd now nearing 200,000 miles. My 2004 Focus with 2.3L and 5 spd, near the end of the first generation is at 167,000 miles. My 2004 Buick Le Sabre with the 3.8 V6 and pretty much the last of the breed is at 45,000 miles. All are freeway driven and all are meticulously cared for. In fact used cars whisper to me to buy and save them from their ultimate fate.
Oh, and there is a 1998 Sable wagon in the garage with the Vulcan engine at 207,000 miles. However, the engine makes a loud rhythmic rapping at idle while running perfectly smooth and normal. Been through the top end twice and took a look at the bottom end but can yet locate the source. All after an oil change and intake gasket change.
Collapsed lifter, maybe?
Tom, be on the lookout for SUVs and CUVs on your next list.
I was able to get 220k miles on a 2005 Ford Escape in upstate New York over 8 years. Since it was my sole means of transportation, maintenance was the key to longevity. Yes, it did show signs of rust in the wheel wells. But, I only gave up on the car because the A/C went out just before returning home to the Deep South.
I sold the car on Craig’s List in one day. The buyer took it to Mexico 🇲🇽
The W-platform traces its origins back to Reagan’s first term. By the late 80s, it was GM’s weapon against the Ford Taurus, but GM lost the market timing (the first W-model only came out in late 1987). Also, it was a joke when compared to Japanese cars in terms of quality. Early W-cars cars even had two slanting structural beams on either side of the engine bay. Why? Engineers failed to develop a rigid chassis, so they had to add them afterward. As a result, you had to unscrew one of the bars to have access to the battery. Maybe later models like this ’05 Impala were not too bad when compared to older ones.
Nope, even the Impala Limited with the modern 3.6 that ran through 2016 still had the structural brace over the battery. Not really a hard job though, no more movements involved than the battery hold down brace on my ’99 Avalon. And if you want real structural issues, take a look at the ’92-99 H Body. Factory strut tower brace. And they all developed cracked rear door opening plastic trim around where the upper corner of the rear window glass was due to structural bending. In fact, you couldn’t usually close the rear door easily with the car on a lift. I often wondered if you left both rear doors open with the car on a lift overnight, would permanent structural damage result? The unintended plus to this is many demolition derby enthusiasts seek these cars out, not only because of the rugged drivetrain that isn’t failure prone, but also because the rear crash structure deflects downward, meaning you can use it as a reverse battering ram, keep the wheels in contact with the ground, and still see where you’re going in reverse.
I’m enjoying this series. My city uses a lot of salt in the winter months that typically makes car ownership, if driven often in winter, expensive after twelve years or so.
It’s not just the body panels but the underside repairs start to add up.
The person who owned that Lucerne possibly got rid of it after the divorce as 361,000 miles in ten years kept him/her from ever being home.
What is shocking is how many honest dealers appear to be out there advertising the actual mileage instead of running to the nearest junkyard and buying and then installing a replacement instrument cluster with half the miles. ALL of these cars have dozens of representative examples in any junkyard. Could you really tell if the car you are buying had 150k miles or 300k miles on it? (Yes I know it’s highly illegal)
Some (many? most?) modern cars store the total mileage in the ECU, not the speedometer. And the ECU is tied to the VIN. Being a scoundrel is not as easy as it used to be.
“What is shocking is how many honest dealers appear to be out there advertising the actual mileage instead of running to the nearest junkyard and buying and then installing “a replacement instrument cluster with half the miles.”
Or maybe they tell the truth on just enough cars to make you think all of them have actual miles. 🙂 Titles in my state require you to check a box affirming that mileage is actual, or else the new title comes out noted as “not actual mileage”. Most likely they figure that the truth is not as bad as what buyers will think if they only know that the mileage has been fuddled with.
I’ve got a couple of high mileage vehicles myself. My ’96 Mustang was purchased with 150,000 miles. I put another 52,000 on it since. I’m also on my second replacement intake manifold. I purchased my ’96 Explorer 5.0 with 250,000 mils on it. It came with a thick file of repair invoices. I’ve put 13,000 since. 1000 miles in a trip to Palm Springs last week. Not too many repairs on these two. How long will I keep them? Hard to tell, they aren’t worth very much but are still in good shape inside and out.
Probably the most important things to keep an eye on are fluid levels. As cars get older they will leak and burn some oil. They must be checked at every gas stop. If you change the oil every 3,000 miles you could be down two to three quarts of engine oil by that time.
I am surprised about the Impala. Those suffered from the following:
Intake manifold gaskets (3.8l and 3.4l)
Coolant leaks(such as the timing chain cover) (3.4l)
BCM(Body Control Module) issues
Theftlock issue (unit in ignition would fail and it would not read chip in key)
Most folks were ready to dump their Impalas when they were starting to not be able to start their cars due to this. In fact when i worked at Win Kelly Chevy, we would have a lot of them come in for this theftlock issue and the cost of replacing that unit, the BCM(which this unit is tied into) and the labor and programming costs made it a $2000-$2500 repair. We(at Win Kelly) would see a lot of folks pay the diagnostic fee and drive it down the street to the Honda dealer and buy an Accord. Those Impalas had no real value anymore anyway
The wholesaler that I know has a 2007 Ford Focus with 294,561 miles on it. Other then the tear in the drivers seat, the car looks pretty good and runs well. I have driven it a couple of times being nostalgic for my old 2005 Focus. It brought back a lot of memories such as the sound the auto locking makes.
He once told me that once a car (even a Toyota or Honda) reaches 200,000 miles a dealer really cannot get much for the vehicles. He is selling his for $900
http://www.values4youmd.com/vehicle/239555/2007-ford-focus-for-sale-in-laurel-md-md-20855
He also had a 2009 Kia Spectra that had 310,492 miles that was a fully loaded manual transmission car that looked like it was new(except for a crack in the windshield)
“We(at Win Kelly) would see a lot of folks pay the diagnostic fee and drive it down the street to the Honda dealer and buy an Accord.”
And lose an opportunity to create a loyal customer, while creating one for Honda. Chevrolet should have comped those repairs. That this list of specific repairs existed meant the engineering and / or installation was a factory defect.
Honda comped their auto transmission repairs, didn’t they?
There’s a SAAB 900 on cars.com with 560K miles: https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/detail/748117951/overview/