I regret not having had more time to properly analyze GM’s announcement last week. There’s a few key issues that are important to note: GM has said it “aspires to eliminate tailpipe emissions from new light-duty vehicles by 2035”. Aspiration does not equal commitment. GM (and many other companies) has aspired to quite a few things over the decades that never materialized.
And this aspiration only applies to light duty vehicles, meaning passenger cars and light trucks up to 8,500 lbs maximum Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR). This exempts all of the HD versions of the popular pickup trucks. And it wouldn’t take much to exempt the extremely popular light duty pickups/trucks, which currently have GVWR’s of some 7,000 lbs. The Suburban already has a GVWR of 7,700 lbs. I’m not saying it’s going to happen, I’m just pointing it out.
And GM has a lot of catching up to do, both in its product line and reputation. Remember their “aspirations” to sell hydrogen fuel cell vehicles by 2010?
In 2002, GM CEO Rick wagoner introduced the Hy-wire fuel cell platform that was going to underpin a range of consumer vehicles by 2010. And then there was going to be the two-mode hybrid revolution at GM. And then…
I’m not suggesting anything nefarious in Mary Barra’s announcement, but the timing is very obviously not a coincidence, given the new administration’s push on climate change strategies and likely new incentives for EVs. And then there’s the stock market, which has gone bonkers over any and every EV start up.
Even Eugene’s tiny Arcimoto, which has been building very small numbers of their three-wheeler, has seen their stock jump from $5.39 in October to $24.21 on 1/26, a 450% increase.
Here’s some quotes from GM’s press release on the specifics:
GM will offer 30 all-electric models globally by mid-decade and 40 percent of the company’s U.S. models offered will be battery electric vehicles by the end of 2025. GM is investing $27 billion in electric and autonomous vehicles in the next five years – up from the $20 billion planned before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Note “globally”, as that includes their joint ventures and affiliates in China, some of which are already building a substantial number of low-cost EVs not relevant to the NA market.
More than half of GM’s capital spending and product development team will be devoted to electric and electric-autonomous vehicle programs. And in the coming years, GM plans to offer an EV for every customer, from crossovers and SUVs to trucks and sedans.
“More than half” means there will still be a very considerable investment in traditional programs.
The company will also continue to increase fuel efficiency of its traditional internal combustion vehicles in accordance with regional fuel economy and greenhouse gas regulations. Some of these initiatives include fuel economy improvement technologies, such as Stop/Start, aerodynamic efficiency enhancements, downsized boosted engines, more efficient transmissions and other vehicle improvements, including mass reduction and lower rolling resistance tires.
It’s not like GM is walking away from its current bread and butter. Profits from its trucks and SUVs are essential to maintain GM’s ability to continue its investment program, as well as just sustain its operations, dividends, etc.
The somewhat painful reality is that GM has a lot of catching up to do. The Chevy Bolt has essentially been a “compliance mobile”, one that GM loses money on in exchange for EV credits. It has to be sold at heavily discounted prices.
At the other end of the spectrum, the GMC Hummer is very expensive; its role being to establish a new macho/cool image for EVs in the market where high-end pickups like Ford’s Raptor have been making hay.
This is all good and fine, but GM has a long way to go, to meet its “aspirations”. Hopefully, unlike the many aspirations of the past, GM actually gets there.
It makes sense from GM’s prospective. The company lacks the engineering talent necessary to catch up with conventional products. With electrics, it is battery and little else. With solid state batteries the next step, the real concerns will be supplies of lithium and electricity. Where will it all come from?
1) Nuclear
2) Australia, Chile, and Argentina:
Nuclear power simply costs too much. That’s why it is being phased out all over Europe. Wind and solar cost much less.
Canada has an enormous potential on top of our already large hydro-electric system. Here in British Columbia a large hydro development on the Columbia River which will provide 5100 GWh. This is enough for an additional 450,000 homes. It is intended to provide for EVs and exports to the USA.
China has nixed any more nuclear and will go solar and wind.
My dad worked for power utilities before he started his own businesses. He always told me how much power was available on the sport market at night, Time of use jurisdictions usually give a 60% discount on power after 11:00 PM.
It’s a bigger discount than that here and for a longer period of time. We look at it more the other way – as having a penalty for usage during a few hours of the day.
TOD rates
Non-Summer October-April On-Peak Monday-Friday 5-9 p.m. 22.42¢ / kWh ($0.2242 / kWh)
and Summer May-Sept Monday-Friday 2-7pm 22.42¢ / kWh ($0.2242 / kWh)
Off-Peak All other hours, weekends and major holidays* 7.19¢ / kWh ($0.0719 / kWh)
Tier Charge Additional charge for all kWh used in excess of 700 kWh in any month. 2.46¢ / kWh ($0.0246 / kWh)
It isn’t difficult to avoid most of the on-peak hours for most things. Solar would come in handy to avoid the Tier Charge and much of the On-Peak but would take a long time to pay for itself as the power is so inexpensive (in my opinion).
We don’t have time of use metering in British Columbia, although I believe we should. The figures I quote are from Ontario.
Our rates in CAD are $0.10 for the first 750 kw/h, so approx. $ 0.07 in USD.
Manitoba and Quebec are even cheaper. The most expensive by far is Ontario, which is over 50% nuclear. The prairies are about 30% more than BC as they do not employ many renewables.
Something like 95% of the power in British Columbia is from renewables which is why it is so cheap. Canada as a whole is about 65% renewables.
Over 750 kw/h is C$0.14, or about $0.11 USD.
I live in a large, three bedroom apartment, with all the latest energy savings stuff. My monthly electric bill is C$35 in the winter and C$25 in the summer. Cooling isn’t necessary where I live.
Could you define what “renewables” are? 95% seems like a huge number.
Our renewables are hydro electric at about 90% and various sources such as biomass and wind power make up the rest.
Offshore wind farms are being constructed in Hecate Straight, which is very windy indeed. Others are being planned at the moment, too.
Here is a complete breakdown for Canada’s electrical generation:
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/data-analysis/energy-data-analysis/energy-facts/electricity-facts/20068
Here is the breakdown for British Columbia:
https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-commodities/electricity/report/2016-canadian-renewable-power/province/canadas-renewable-power-landscape-2016-energy-market-analysis-british-columbia.html#:~:text=Close%20to%2095%25%20of%20BC's,gas%2C%20wind%2C%20and%20oil.
Interesting, thanks for the link. It was fascinating to see that Prince Edward Island (Population of just under 200K, so around the size of my city) gets 98.3% (!!!) of it’s total electricity from Wind. And then gets 0.5% from Solar and most of the rest from Biomass.
That would seem to take the wind out of the sails of some who say that wind is unreliable and a poor energy source. I assume it’s usually windy there but still, I wonder if they store any of it or if there is so much that it perhaps produces far more than the local need and the rest is sold or transmitted to the mainland and just a slight breeze suffices for the locals. (Never been there but always wanted to go, now even more…)
I’m way off topic now, I know. Thanks though.
PEI is exposed to the open Atlantic sea and the North Atlantic Trade Winds. There is pretty much always an onshore wind of ~10 kn or more.
When PEI’s windfarm project was announced, all the regular nay-sayers, mostly old guys, got all bent out of shape and predicted the end of the universe, no wind days, etc. Wind replaced diesel generators.
PEI is still connected to NB should there be no wind. To this day, there has not been a need to use imported power.
On the West Coast, Hecate Straight is going to be developed big. It is one of the windiest places in North America. At the moment it is calm at 19 kn.
I really don’t understand the resistance to new technologies to make a better world. I suppose there’s nothing new about it, though.
Jim, your mention of Prince Edward Island reminded me of this town….and it’s very far inland.
Thought some might find this interesting. Note this article is from 2009.
https://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-and-environment/rock-port-missouri-zmaz09onzraw
In 2019 Canada consumed these exojoules from these sources:
Oil: 4.5
NatGas: 4.3
Hydro: 3.4
Renewables: 0.5
Hydro is a distant 3rd place while renewables are insignificant. Quadrupling the quantity of mountains and rain/snowfall – the guts of hydro – will be hard to do. Without fossil fuels, nukes are the only alternative.
Is that “overall consumption” including what’s used to directly fuel cars etc or is that “consumption to create utility electricity for sale to the population”?
Total energy consumption.
Wrong:
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/data-analysis/energy-data-analysis/energy-facts/electricity-facts/20068
Please provide a link to back up your assertion.
Crude oil accounted for the largest proportion of primary energy production in Canada in 2017 at 46.4%, followed by natural gas (34.4%), primary electricity (9.0%), total coal (6.4%) and gas plant natural gas liquids (3.8%).
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/57-003-x/57-003-x2019002-eng.htm
You are comparing apples and oranges.
My God, that Pickup Truck at the top is Fugly!
I haven’t seen so much chrome on a front end since a ’58 Buick.
Throw some dagmars on the bumper. The sides of the Truck need grills too. Make the whole body Grills! The Bed would be self-draining!
I really wish Bruce McCall would do an updated brochure for the 2021 Bulgemobiles pickup line.
+100
It looks like an air conditioning unit.
There must be a limit to how large a pickup truck can be.
Apparently we have not yet reached this point.
Pffft, Hino has that little toy beat. 🙂 Chevy has lots of room to grow.
The front end on the pickup looks to be at least 6′ tall! There is NO WAY that the driver can see over the edge of the hood when driving that thing!! Personally, I thing the design is an unmitigated disaster.
If it hits a Pedestrian, a portion will be extruded through the punched-out letters spelling Chevrolet. Rename it the Grill-Master!
The safety of the pedestrian is secondary to the psychological needs of the owner.
Jeez, a lot of eight-year-olds could hide in the front blind spot of that thing.
(runs to see if “front blind spot” is a term yet)
Front blindspot certainly does already exist Im driving such a device in a hour or so from Freightliner and its a cabover Argosy model
Shhh! We have to love pickup trucks here.
Actually, lithium won’t be as big a problem as cobalt and other metals used in the EV drive train (motors, etc). But everything has a price of acquisition.
Battery technology will be the key to success for all the players, and they all will be able to play. I suspect that once the “technologies” are mature and licensing is available for use, all the manufacturers with adequate backing and earnings will be selling comparable spec vehicles. But that’s years down the road.
I did a bit of digging but came up with this example for electricity sources and consumption trends in Germany.
Renewables are leading the way. Solar is big business. Friends of mine recently built a new home in Hannover. The did a 50 kw/h system, for which they received a large tax credit. There are several months a year the sell more power than they use.
https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/germanys-energy-consumption-and-power-mix-charts
Fifty kilowatts dwarfs my own 3 kw system which has nine panels. Electricity rates in Canada vs. the U.S. are the reverse of the gasoline price ratios. Maybe that Columbia river dam might not be necessary if rates were not so low.
The majority of our power goes to commercial customers such as pulp mills and the huge Inco aluminum smelter on the Peace River.
The new dam is part of a longer term to have carbon credits for said dam and to export much of the power to the USA.
Oil, natural gas, and coal supplied the vast majority of Germany’s energy requirements last year. Renewables supplied less than one-fifth of total energy consumed; not an insignificant amount, but expensive to scale.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/583158/energy-consumption-by-source-germany/
Again, you are wrong:
https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/news/2019/Public-net-electricity-generation-in-germany-2019.html
https://www.iea.org/reports/germany-2020
This is Genital Motors we are talking about. That company can screw up a wet dream…
At 52, I still aspire to be 6’2″, up from my 6’1/2″.
I haven’t the slightest illusion that running any big company is hard yakka, and I know for a fact such things are not for me nor ever were. I haven’t the brains, and I don’t like lifts.
But I do believe in a humanistic morality, and don’t pretend it cannot be defined.
And as such a fool, I still wonder how it is that properly clever people, like the Barras & Co of this world, live satisfied that they have done something – or anything – useful in this world from under their protective perfumed stench of rotting dishonesty?
GM is proud to launch The Asterisk, and all it protects. Again.
Oh well.
I guess lots and lots and money does provide a lot of insulation, and a clean air supply.
>>[ *A P P L A U S E* ]<<
So…GM will comply with the law. Jolly good! Er…that’s something to boast about in a press release, then, is it?
….and once again the dreamers argue with the realists……..