(first posted 11/27/2016) It is fitting that our feature car was designed by a Roman Catholic priest; ‘catholic’ (small c), means ‘universal’, and to the best of my knowledge no design has been so universally reviled. Is it merely ugly? No. An Aztek is merely ugly. This is Anglerfish ugly. Deliverance ugly. It has a face not even Mother Theresa could have loved. It is what would have emerged from the studio of Captain Ahab had he taken up car design.
The man behind the car, Alfred A. Juliano, was born on December 19, 1919, to Louis and Catherine Juliano of Philadelphia. As a youth, he showed a keen interest in the arts and sciences, particularly those pertaining to automobile design; however, young Alfred decided to pursue a higher calling, and in 1932 joined the Order of the Holy Ghost Junior Seminary, in Cornwell Heights, Pennsylvania, to begin his clerical studies. Meantime and somehow, a few of his sketches had come to the attention of someone at GM which, in 1938, offered him a scholarship to study with Harley Earl. Perhaps Juliano would have benefited from a long talk with Mr. Earl, but in any case, he was committed to fulfilling his ordination and staying at the seminary.
For the next three years, Juliano taught physics and served as chaplain at Virginia’s Saint Emma Military Academy, where new professional connections led him to experts and other resources in design-related fields. And as fate would have it, his Order soon appointed Father Juliano to the post of assistant pastor at St. Mary’s Church, in Branford, Connecticut. While there, he enrolled at nearby Yale University, where he pursued both a doctorate degree in aerodynamics and his dream of designing the world’s safest car.
After two years at the drawing board and three years of construction, Father Juliano’s Aurora Safety Car prototype was at last real. Whether by design, coincidence or indifference, the Aurora’s styling and construction distinctly recalled those of watercraft. Its 18-foot-long, 100-percent fiberglass body–perched over a largely wooden skeleton, which itself sat atop the salvaged chassis of a 1953 Buick Roadmaster–was advertised as impervious to dents and corrosion. It was topped with a gigantic, transparent-plastic greenhouse (literally) that provided a nearly 360-degree view (albeit quite a distorted one). The headliner was fitted with metallic sunshades that blocked out the rays but were likely to cook the cabin on a hot, sunny day, one reason why Juliano planned to offer air conditioning as standard equipment.
The car’s bulging windshield, which resembled the head of a B-movie space alien, was designed to reduce head injuries by increasing the distance between it and the car’s occupants; in the pre-airbag era, it was probably as good a solution as was available. And in all fairness to Father Juliano and his prototype, the Aurora presaged several safety features that would eventually be included in virtually all modern cars, among them seat belts, a padded instrument panel with recessed gauges, side-impact bars, an integrated roll cage, and a collapsible steering column. The Aurora’s four occupants sat in individual captain’s chairs that they could could swivel 180-degrees in the event of an impending collision. Switch controlled, frame-mounted hydraulic jacks provided assistance when changing a tire, a la Citroën DS.
The spare tire was mounted on a platform ahead of the radiator in order to enhance front-impact protection, and could be lowered to the ground via a switch on the dashboard. The front end itself was essentially a huge, foam-stuffed bumper that was designed to scoop up inattentive pedestrians without injuring them. At least in theory.
Despite its innovative protective features, it is no surprise that today the Aurora is remembered for its looks. It tops lists of the world’s ugliest cars with the same consistency that Chinese Cresteds win ugly dog contests. Although the undulating surfaces and body-by-Rubbermaid were meant to increase the fiberglass body’s rigidity, Father Juliano apparently liked what he saw; he was quoted in several interviews as saying that (the American people) “won’t pay for safety, but they will pay for style.” And pay they would have to, since the Aurora’s projected price was $15,000–some $2,000 more than the ne plus ultra Cadillac Eldorado Brougham.
On November 11, 1957, Father Juliano drove his prototype for the first time, starting out for a midtown Manhattan hotel, the first stop on what was to be a 120-city press tour. According to automotive journalist Michael Lamm, the Aurora’s maiden voyage was somewhat less than triumphant:
On its way from Branford (Connecticut) to Manhattan, the Aurora broke down no fewer than 15 times. It had to be towed to seven different garages and repair shops along the way. Why? Because during the three years that Father Juliano was building the Aurora’s huge, curvilinear fiberglass body, the car’s engine hadn’t once been started. In those three years, water got into the gas tank and, on the trip to Manhattan, rust clogged the fuel line. No sooner would Father Juliano clear out the rust flakes than the fuel system would stop up again.”
Father Juliano called the hotel manager to say he was running a bit late and that the intro, originally set for 8 A.M., would probably take place closer to noon. Most of the assembled reporters waited until early afternoon before heading back to their offices. Around 3 P.M., Juliano called the hotel again, this time from Harlem, to report a dead battery and a further delay. Finally, about an hour later, he arrived at the hotel with the Aurora, but by that time the assembled press corps had dwindled to a TV crew and two print reporters.
Subjecting already cynical reporters to an over eight-hour wait does not exactly set the stage for favorable reporting, and the press coverage was predictably unkind. “Dream Car Arrives from Connecticut After Nightmare of Breakdown”, headlined the next day’s The New York Times. The Bridgeport Post led with “Auto Built by Priest for Safety Perils Traffic”. Neither paper went into much detail about the car’s many new safety features, but they spared neither words nor photos when it came to its unusual appearance.
Things went downhill from there. Inevitably, the Catholic church and the IRS (and perhaps a couple of grudge-holding reporters) began scrutinizing Father Juliano’s finances following the Aurora’s disastrous debut. Like many Catholic priests, Reverend Juliano was bound by a vow of poverty, and quickly spent the small amount of money he did have. To keep things running, he began hitting up his parishioners and the community at large for donations and, in 1956, formed Custom Automobile Corporation of America to shield himself him from responsibility for prototype-related debt. It was a smart move; the cost of building the thing wound up topping $30,000.
Juliano started telling reporters that his troubles had been instigated by General Motors, and compared himself to Preston Tucker, another automotive visionary whose dream was extinguished early on. And then came the rumors that began circulating around Bridgeport that Father Juliano had actually spent only a small share of donations on the Aurora and pocketed the rest.
In September 1958, Alfred Juliano left the Order of the Holy Ghost following a testy confrontation with his religious superiors. In the end, the church and IRS investigations found no evidence of fraud or theft; in fact, Juliano was indeed impoverished and eventually filed bankruptcy. The Aurora prototype went to a Cheshire, Connecticut auto body shop as partial compensation for unpaid bills. In December 1988, Rev. Alfred A. Juliano suffered a brain hemorrhage. He died three months later, on March 2, 1989. However, the Aurora’s story doesn’t end there.
Andy Saunders is a Poole, England-based artist, author, and auto restorer and customizer whose creations have won multiple awards and accolades on several continents. In 1993, Mr. Saunders encountered his first glimpse of the Aurora in a book about dream cars and became fascinated with it. After years of detective work, Mr. Saunders finally tracked down the Aurora through an old photo of a Connecticut repair shop. He promptly contacted the shop’s owner, who agreed to sell him the car for $1,500, and Saunders began arranging its shipment to England.
The car arrived in a decrepit-bordering-on-hopeless condition–it had been left to the elements for 30-plus years, after all–but Mr. Saunders committed to its restoration, and after several years of hard work, the car had been restored to its original fiberglass glory. Then, in 2005, came a call from England’s very prestigious Goodwood Festival of Speed, inviting Mr. Saunders to display his meticulously restored Aurora. He accepted, and has since arranged for his car to be featured at several museums worldwide. It remains a prized member of Mr. Saunders’ personal collection to this day.
The Aurora, like the Tucker before it, predicted many safety features decades before mainstream vehicles featured them. And say what you will about his car’s looks, you’ve got to give Father Juliano props for being so selflessly devoted to building it.
Can I get an Amen?
Special thanks to Andy Saunders, several of whose photos appear in this article with his permission. I recommend a visit to www.andysaunders.net to car lovers everywhere as a great place to spend some time.
Looks like something from the Pixar movie “Cars”.
I’ve never seen, nor heard of the Aurora. Looking at it, I find it hideous to look at. I find the 1948 Tucker Torpedo much more attractive.
My grandfather entered a contest to win a Tucker 48. He didn’t win, but he kept the ticket! Being that he was a committed Ford guy, He Naturally ended up buying a new ’49 Ford, But he also bought (new) a 1950 Dodge pickup! Both existing in my family till the 1970s!
Cool. I would’ve taken the Tucker any day over this.
Oh, Yeah, Me Too. BTW, There was a guy who campaigned a Tucker in early NASCAR who was from Mount Oliver (Near South Side of Pittsburgh,PA). Goes a long way (IMHO) to prove that the Tucker was a production car. I wish I had details as I live three miles from there! (Perhaps Pittsburghers were very into the Tucker at the time?) I also believe that there was a connection to Braddock,PA. Being from the Mon Valley, This is in my “wheelhouse”.!
As much as I H8 to reply to myself, A Tucker did race at Canfield Ohio in 1951. Sponsored by a Mt.Oliver,Pa Used car dealer. Cool part. The building still stands!
Given the concepts involved, the styling ideals of the day, The car HAD to look like that. I’m glad that these concepts are being retrieved and restored. The actual vehicles may seem odd,ugly or silly, But what will “they” say in 40 years about the ugly experimental “autonomous” camera and laser laden roof rack setups on OUR cars (uber,etc….) ? Hell, that spinning s**t on the Pittsburgh Ubers still makes me laugh today. Bring back tailfins, at least they didn’t distract me!
I just realized that ‘Pittsburgh Ubers” would be a great name for a band! (or a semi-pro hockey team,..)
Agreed 🙂
Form follows function but nothing need be ugly… at least not that ugly.
A minor correction: all Catholics priests are not bound by a vow of poverty. The vow of poverty applies to priests who are in religious orders (Benedictines, Franciscans, Jesuits, Carmelites, Dominicans, Order of the Holy Ghost etc.). Diocesan priests (most parish priests) do not take a vow of poverty.
As a “fallen” Catholic, I attest that you are right,Sir!
Mea maxima culpa. As a practicing Catholic I should have known that. Fixed.
As my own parish priest once explained to me: “Priests in Religious Orders take a vow of poverty. We Diocesan priests are the ones who actually live it.” 🙂
Lol!
Yep…The three vows taken by Religious Order Priests
Poverty (no money)
Chastity (no honey)
Obedience (a boss)
Most Diocesan priests make two promises:
Celibacy (no wifey)
Obedience (a boss/The Bishop)
The promise of celibacy has been waived on a few occasions for Diocesan priests.
Ha,ha,ha!
“The promise of celibacy has been waived on a few occasions for Diocesan priests.”
That’s correct. In some cases, married Anglican and Episcopal priests have been allowed to convert to Roman Catholicism, remain priests, and remain married.
One such gentleman served in my mother’s parish, and she could never get used to him referring to his wife when he delivered his sermons!
We have a former Episcopal, now Catholic, priest here. I’ve seen him deliver Mass many times. He has four kids.
Oddly, there are two other priests nearby that have, or had, children. Quite unusual but simply proves they haven’t always been a priest. 🙂
Also priests in some Eastern Rite Catholic traditions can be be married.
+1 Yep,!
Definitely not bound to a vow of poverty. I had this really tossed in my face by the director of the Gannon College (now University) theater, a gentleman of very good looks (say Richard Chamberlin in the Doctor Kildare days), epic sartorial style, driving a V-12 Jaguar XJS . . . . . . and an ordained Catholic priest.
The co-eds on campus promptly nicknamed him “Father Oh-What-A Waste”. And, as far as I knew, he had no problems sticking to the celibacy of his vows. From students of either sex.
Oy Veh!
Some people used to drop a tab of acid or eat some magic mushrooms, and see God.
Here, a man of God apparently did both at once…and saw THIS. Damn…this leaves ugly in the rear-view mirror.
Given how progressively ugly ALL cars have become, I guarantee he was NOT the only car designer to do ‘shrooms!
Not only do I think you’re correct, the best proof of this is the 1961 Plymouths.
I “see” your 61 Plymouths, and “raise” you the “Solid for 60”, Although I’ll take either year Plymouth before the Aztec! (a car that I think that I defended for at least not being boring!)
I would’ve thrown in the ’62 Dodges (I actually find the Plymouths of the same year to be tolerable), but I blame that debacle on President Bill Newburg, and not on the designers!
I’m a madman who likes all those early ’60s MoPar designs! for whatever that means. ?
Despite all of its advanced safety gear, did anyone ever happen to notice the Aurora’s apparent lack of windshield wipers?
Without nanotechnology, wipers are impossible!
I can vaguely remember reading an article on this car from some classic car magazine in the 60’s. The theory on the windshield, besides the safety aspect, was that the shape would move water droplets out of the way while in motion.
Well, that was the theory.
Having tested this theory often on motorcycle helmet faceshields, it does work. Sorta.
Thanks for solving that mystery, Syke…at least in theory. 🙂
I was intrigued enough to seek out the rest of the Special Interest Autos article, which I found posted on the Find A Grave website; it also mentions how the windshield’s shape was supposed to make wipers unnecessary:
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=pv&GRid=103109645&PIpi=119677452
Lifetime supply of RainX must have been planned as standard equipment. Just don’t drive at all in ice or snow.
“You’re gonna need a bigger boat.”
A win!
+1
We all have an opinion, aka knee jerk reaction about looks that’s coded in our DNA, and filtered through social norms. We also all, as the saying goes, have an anal sphincter, and one is worth as much as the other. Although I’m just as guilty as anyone else of hosting a one adjective judgement, it doesn’t seem fair to the Father. And it’s not very interesting reading.
I’m jealous that the guy actually got it made, and that he had honorable intentions with it. I had always attached the “insurance company safety concept” to this car, even if I read otherwise. In that scenario, its appearance might be judged more harshly, given it would have taken a committee to approve it. To be reminded that it was the work of one man is to respect it as a singular dream realized.
Stick to your day job, Father.
This thing is ugly. I mean needing an exorcism ugly. But what a fascinating story. Thanks Imperialist for bringing this to us.
+1 Very interesting and well told story.
The face on that car reminds me of the faces of some of the characters in some classic Twilight Zone episodes.
This car actually made some serious waves in the auto publications back in the day. I remember reading about it as a child.
As to ugly: To modern eyes, definitely. Now, put it up against: 1958 Edsel, 1957-80 Mercury, 1957 Lincoln, 1958-60 Lincoln, 1958 Packard Hawk, 1957 Hudson.
Back in the day, it was considered somewhat extreme (but only a half step or so behind a few of the Big 3’s dream cars), but a few steps shy of absolutely ugly.
Yep
Put it up against a Nissan Juke, a BMW i3, or the latest Prius it actually looks to be in good company
…uh,er, just about ANY Prius….(2 Me anyhow!)
It’s almost like he’d tried to combine the styling of a mid-1930s car with a late 1950s one – but the two happened to be facing in opposite directions…
Still, quirky things like this make the world more interesting!
It wasn’t until I read the entire article before I realized (oh, my gosh) this thing is real. Fascinating article about another car (prototype) I have never heard of. Thank you, Imperialist! I wonder if the writers of “The Simpsons” had seen a picture of this before the episode featuring “The Homer”. I sincerely hope that the former Father Juliano didn’t die in disgrace.
I immediately thought of The Homer as well. Very fascinating story though, and it’s a shame that he was beset by so many problems while trying to follow through on something he (it seems) honestly believed in.
The more I look at the Aurora, the more I’m certain that it looks familiar.
Are we certain that Father Juliano didn’t further develop the concept, and release it under another model name?
You know….. It’s possible! Good thing he’s not Hindu? —- Ok that’s just being Frank….OK, bad enuf!…… So this dyslectic walks into a bra……
Great piece Imperialist. That windscreen must have been a doozy to recreate.
+1!
As ugly as that car is, it could pass for a modern car!
One man’s vision, ugly as it is, was motivated by trying to do something about the terrible annual traffic fatality count then. That he was able to present any functional, finished car is remarkable. Most such projects usually stall long before they’re complete. One wonders what his ultimate objective was: volume production? licensing of safety features to major manufacturers?
The motivation to reduce pedestrian fatalities is what caught my attention. In that regard, it’s very forward-looking. And rather impressive. I’m not sure just how well it would have worked, given that it was strictly intuitive and not based on any tests, but I’d much rather get hit by it than a ’57 Cadillac.
This para appears towards the end of the SIA article by Michael Lamm
Gawd that thing is ugly but he had a few good ideas the jack all system was fitted to a lot of upscale british cars for years so that wasnt original, Ford had previously offered seat belts with a very low take up rate, That he got it built is great a tremendous effort.
as noted by many so far, if i had only seen the direct front view photo i would’ve thought it was a press release of the new 2017 CUV/SUV/Truck whatever make mobile.
Imperialist, this was a great article to read. I’ve never heard of the Aurora, or Alfred Juliano before, and am really fascinated by the story.
At first, I didn’t think it was all that ugly, but rather more 1950s-era futuristic-looking. But that head-on shot changed my mind. Wow! But regardless of the car’s looks, the story is very compelling. Too bad Fr. Juliano didn’t get a second chance at designing a car. Many of his ideas were so visionary, they do the term “visionary” a disservice.
One thing I’m really curious about is what Alfred Juliano did between 1958 and his death 30 years later. I wonder if he was able to do any type of engineering or creative work at all — or for that matter, whether he wanted to. Regardless, he sure had an interesting story to tell.
The only info I found says that after leaving the order he returned to Philadelphia to care for is mother:
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=103109645
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/automobiles/collectibles/23UGLY.html
I recall reading a brief article about this vehicle in Motor Trend sometime in the ’60’s-it’s certainly an interesting story but the vehicle looks like something Salvador Dali would design on a bad day.
Reminds me of the time Homer Simpson took a stab at car design
https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/6/28/5/grid-cell-17338-1372412277-5.jpg
Gawd, that car has a face and body only a Father could love.
I can’t quite place which movie, but that front end reminds me of an alien out of a 1950s sci-fi movie.
On the other hand, the car looks like something out of a 1940s/50s cartoon.
But you gotta admit it is an interesting concept car for the time.
I remember reading about this car in the late 50’s in MOTOR LIFE or MOTOR TREND,still have the magazine in my collection.
I think Collectible Automobile published a pic and a couple of paragraphs when a reader spotted it behind that Connecticut body shop, about 25 years ago.
If it weren’t for the windshield that looks like a failed attempt at glass blowing and the front which looks like an attempt to make a bulldozer blade aerodynamic, it’d actually be sorta nice.
I flog a small, eclectic collection of vintage sealed vinyl records for fun and a terribly small profit. This album caught my eye for the cover illustration. Apparently it’s a 1938 Phantom Corsair that was on display at the Harrah Automobile museum in Nevada. They only made one apparently, and thank goodness for that!
Running gear was Cord 810. Designed and the build overseen by Rust Heinz, scion to the Heinz pickle fortune.
Appeared in a pre-WWII movie or two, called something that today sounds incredibly stupid, but I’ll be damned if I can remember the name. Something like Flying Wombat.
It was called “flying wombat”, but only in one movie. (”The Young in Heart”). Phantom Corsair was the only thing Rust Heinz called it. In movie like irony, Rust Heinz was killed in a car accident.
Great post – and I do admire the builder for following his passion. That said, my first thought on seeing this was a certain monster from the old Outer Limits (1960s) series…
Thanks for finally bring the great father’s car to light once again!
Perhaps more surprising than the story of this car, is that quite a few CC’ers had heard of it. It either completely slipped by me in 50+ years of devouring car magazines and books, or I had successfully wiped it from my memory to avoid nightmares. But taken from the perspective of 21st century design and safety focus, it certainly seems innovative. And I think the windshield concept was emulated a few years later on various “bubble shield” motorcycle helmets
You have to figure that unique “greenhouse” might refract sunlight in unexpected and destructive ways. Think kingsize boiled cabbages!
I could have sworn that I saw this car at the 1958 auto show in Baltimore when I was 11. It was not approachable, but I seem to remember the giant windshield, which affected my sketches for months!
Not only was this car far ahead of it’s time in safety development, it also seems to have inspired, sadly, grill designs in some modern cars as well.
What a great article on a car I never knew existed.
Reminds me of Penelope Pitstop’s car, from the early 1970s Hanna-Barbera animated series, Wacky Races.
Daniel, I think you’ve captured that perfectly!
The Aurora…what a dog!
I vaguely remember seeing pictures of this car back in the day, but I never knew the details. Very interesting!
Thanks.
That front mouth like orifice looks like its swallowing a 67`-68` Camaro whole.
Just like that, (fingers snapping sound) the fugularity of modern cars seems quite tolerable.
To build on an earlier topic, the thing isn’t any uglier than various Studebaker sedans from the 1950’s, or the Packard Hawk, or the Henry J, or the Hudson Jet. It at least has a lot of interesting details. After it sat in one’s driveway for a week, it would probably become more appealing.
Glad to see it was saved .
I can’t believe someone made an actual Penelope Pitstop car .
“meticulously restored” ~ apart from the different steering wheel…..
-Nate
As a retired clergyman (though Protestant), I am somewhat surprised that he found the time to pursue this side-interest. A hobby, yes, by all means – but this?
While a parish priest might conceivably make enough money to do this, in practice it never worked that way for me. Enough for a deposit on a house for retirement, yes; enough to build my own car, no. As for hitting up parishioners to fund it – no way. That’s begging for trouble. I’m not surprised he found it.
I’ve always been annoyed by this. I tried to buy that car several times from the seventies through around the time it went to England and they would never talk about it. I would have paid more that’s for sure!