The Mercedes Benz W123 is justifiably legendary in the car world because of its rational engineering, solid build, and exceptional durability and longevity. W123s are so overbuilt that they can take decades of abuse and minimal maintenance, but still keep rolling, as the wide variety of them still doing their job in the African continent can attest. My personal preference is towards the W124, but I do respect the older model as well and can see why it has such a good reputation. Speaking for myself, I didn’t really pay much attention to the diesel models, which are easily the most numerous over here, because I thought them to be unrefined and hilariously slow. Also, the vast majority of units left in Sri Lanka are not far off in condition from the African ones, having been worked hard for decades with minimal care and upkeep.
Not THAT far off an African example, but at least it still has all the hubcaps!
However, occasionally one does come across a well-kept car, so when I heard that an acquaintance had picked up just such a thing, I wanted to find out more about it. So we met up one weekend for a chat and a good poke around this cactus green (I think that’s the name of this colour) 200d. At the time, it was one of the least costly ways into a Mercedes Benz (the Petrol 200 was slightly cheaper, in the UK market at least). Unlike the Mercedes models that fill that role today however, it didn’t at first glance seem like you were getting less car for your money, as the basic 200D was externally the same car as the most expensive 280E.
First look, wearing the “bundt cake” alloy wheels.
Mind you, these certainly weren’t cheap, with 1978 UK market pricing being 6,250 GBP (approximately $12,200 at 1978 exchange rates) for the 200D, at a time when something like a Mini would have been under 2,000 GBP ($4000). A 280E meanwhile, rang the register at 9,695 GBP ($19,000) or about 50% more than the 200D.
All that money bought you a very rationally designed and beautifully built car with the solidity of a Swabian schloss and approximately the same level of durability as well. What it didn’t buy was much in the way of glitz or flash, or any options beyond the absolute necessities. This was mentioned in contemporary reviews of the car, with journalists comparing the W123 to the competition and wondering what the justification was for the car costing as much as it did, since “performance and equipment was certainly not anything special” (actual lines from a contemporary review). Of course, they didn’t know about the build quality and durability, which has resulted in W123s still working for a living in many places all over the world well into the third decade of the 21st century.
Quite the looker, really.
Over-familiarity may have dulled our responses to it, but the W123 is really a very nice looking car with crisp lines, excellent detailing and minimal unnecessary ornamentation. The familial resemblance to the bigger S Class is also quite evident, as is the lineage from the previous W115. It exudes a sense of solidity and quality that is difficult to define, but unmistakeable when you set eyes on it. A generally unmolested example like this one is a great way to get a fair idea of the impression a car would have made when it was new, and this car likely made quite a strong one. When I drove the car it had the “bundt cake” alloys that were common on all Mercedes products of the era fitted, but the original spec was semi-body coloured wheel covers, which the owner eventually fitted (and appear in some of these pictures). I’m still not sure which of the two wheel designs I prefer, but I can say that a nice W123 really does stand out in modern traffic, especially in a colour like this.
Bundt Cakes or Hubcaps, what does CC think?
“Bank vault-like” has become a bit of a cliche when describing car doors, but that really is the first thing that comes to mind when you open and close the doors of a W123. The solidity, weight and the motion of the hinges, as well as the slight effort needed to firmly shut them all bring to mind something more substantial than a mere car. These hefty portals allow access into a cabin that is as rationally designed and logically laid out as the exterior is, with everything you need and nothing you don’t. This car would originally have had half-fabric seats as per the original spec sheet, but as you can see in the pictures the seats have been re-trimmed in full vinyl. The material is good enough, but doesn’t have quite the same look and feel as the legendary MB-Tex.
Why exactly the re-trim was necessary is a question that I don’t have an answer to, as it had been done by a previous owner. It’s hard to believe that the seats could have worn given the low mileage and overall condition of this car, so it was possibly a change just for the sake of it, which is never ideal. Anyway, the seats feel a bit odd at first, seeming both hard and overtly “springy” and quite different from any modern automotive seating experience. But after a little while seated in them, you start to wonder whether you can get them fitted into your daily driver, because they actually offer a really great combination of support and comfort and would doubtless be stress-free over a long day of driving.
Stark, but somehow inviting too.
The seating position is naturally quite upright and the rectilinear design of the W123, combined with the relatively slim pillars as well as the abundant glass means that visibility from the driving seat is exemplary, and all four corners of the car are easily visible. It’s true there are many good reasons for the thick pillars and smaller windows that infect most modern cars, but when you drive something like this you can’t help but feel like there has been regression instead of progress in some ways. The steering wheel is the only major complaint worth mentioning, because it seems big enough to helm a bus, or perhaps a seagoing vessel. Surely something an inch or two smaller would have done the job of directing this Mercedes just as well! The fact that the ignition key is on the dashboard rather than the column and needs to be operated with the driver’s left hand in RHD cars like this, is also unusual at first but not difficult to get used to.
A truly pleasant driving environment!
Firing the 200D up requires a few seconds of waiting for the glow plug light to go off and I must admit that I turned the key with a bit of trepidation, expecting a very agricultural amount of sound and vibration to immediately disrupt the calmness of the early morning. After all, wasn’t that exactly what conventional wisdom tells you to expect from an old diesel? Imagine my surprise when the 2.0 litre four pot diesel fired up and settled into a muted thrum with only a slight amount of vibration noticeable through the seat and steering wheel. I’ve been in 90s pickup trucks that were far worse in NVH terms, honestly.
The four speed manual gearbox is not going to bother a Miata for shift quality, but neither is it a vague and sloppy mess, as some have described Mercedes manuals of this era. The shift throw is long, true, but also quite positive and smooth. The clutch is also pretty smooth in its action, enabling us to pull away from the curb without drama and join the light Sunday morning traffic. The test route was a free flowing street, so I thought I’d give it the spurs a bit and pressed the very long travel throttle almost to the floor.
When that happens, the thrum from underhood increases in volume significantly, but there doesn’t seem to be much effect on forward progress. Watching the speedometer confirms that you are in fact, accelerating, but the pace at which this happens leisurely at best. The 2.0 litre OM615 diesel engine has several fine qualities, but power is most certainly not one of them! With a peak output of 60 BHP at 4,400 rpm and 83 lb/ft at 2,500 rpm, pushing a car that weighs 3,060lb (1,390Kg) empty, I guess you really can’t expect anything other than gradual progress. I can understand why this motor was never offered in the US market, even in the days of the 55MPH speed limit! Performance figures state a top speed of 84MPH (135 Km/H) and 0-60 in 26-28 seconds. So really not for those in a hurry, then.
Still, this unmolested example shows that even 60 horses can be enough if you use them right. Unlike most other diesel W123s I’d previously experienced, which had all been beaten like the proverbial rented mule, this one might well have had those five dozen horses still in the stable, so it didn’t feel dangerously slow. The four pot doesn’t seem to mind being thrashed a bit, and when you do, it is possible to build up reasonable momentum. Once you build that momentum, conserving it as much as possible is the key to making progress, because building it back up again takes quite a while. In a corner, the four wheel independent suspension (Double wishbones in front and semi-trailing arms in the rear) keeps the body well controlled so it is possible to scoot through at a higher pace than you’d initially imagine. Body roll is present, but relatively mild, while there is no sign of wallowing or pitching when hustled. Once you get used to what the car needs, it’s certainly possible to cover ground fairly quickly on a winding road.
The only major black mark dynamically is the recirculating ball steering, which has little feel and is not particularly fast to respond, but it is at least precise. The four wheel disc brakes (doing without the optional ABS on this car) are capable and feel almost modern in their stopping ability, one area where Mercedes has always been ahead of its time. Of course the W123 was ahead in other areas too, like safety engineering, and of course, durability.
This particular example is a pretty good representation of how a 200D would have felt like when new, and it’s easy to understand why contemporary reviewers were less than thrilled about the W123 in general back then. Compared to, say the BMW E12 5 Series, or the remarkably modern C3 Audi 100 that debuted in 1982, the Benz feels significantly less athletic and modern, almost like it’s from another era altogether. Reviews back then were particularly critical of the pricing, and the question often asked was “What is all this money being spent on?” Well, four decades later it’s pretty clear where the money went, because W123s are still trundling on while the contemporaries have long been turned into washing machines and the like. You certainly aren’t going to see a million kilometre E12 still lugging loads in deepest Africa, that’s for sure!
How it looked pre respray
This car was purchased in the UK by a Sri Lankan doctor who was doing his consultant training, and after using it for a short while there, brought the car back with him when he moved home. He apparently used it quite sparingly and when he passed away the car went to the hands of his son who also ran it very rarely. The family owned it until a couple of years ago, when it was bought by a car flipper type who decided on a respray despite the original paint being in good shape, likely for more sales appeal. The half-fabric/half MBtex seats were redone at the same time. Shortly after, my acquaintance saw it when on his way back from somewhere out of town, and bought it almost on the spot. The odometer reads just over 99,000 Kilometres and apparently the records back that up. That is, of course, barely run in for a 200D, which means this car would be perfectly capable of doing daily duty even, should one want it to.
Original interior.
The current owner has several cars and despite liking this one quite a bit, preferred to have a Petrol example, so this car is for sale now. I considered it myself for a brief moment, but decided it wasn’t quite what I wanted (or needed) in my life at this time. Nonetheless, it proved to be a thoroughly charming car, and gave me a deeper understanding of why W123s are so revered. The fact that an absolute base model like this has basically all the qualities that make a top-of-the-range example special is a testament to the greatness of the basic design, and in my opinion, justifies considering the W123 one of the all time greats.
Related CC reading:
CC Driving Review (With Video): Mercedes 220 Diesel – I Drive The Second Slowest Car Sold In America
Ah – the notorious W123. To me, one of the best cars ever. Along with the MB W124, the Volvo 240 and the Volvo 700/900 series.
“… this cactus green (I think that’s the name of this colour) 200d…”
At least in the Benz’s country of origin, it was called “Agavengrün” ( = agave green), code #880.
Btw: Thank you for the reporting.
Thanks for reading! And the clarification on the colour as well. You and I certainly agree on what we consider some of the best cars ever by the way, I’m a big fan of all of those too.
Very nice example but W124 for me. No doubting these are dependable but very dated and boring, give me a Corolla at 1/4 the price.
Oh well, to each their own eh? I agree the W124 is certainly superior, but the old 123 has a charm of its own.
People are beginning to realize that W123s are good for more than just elderly professionals and hipsters. I was worried about their appreciation so I bought one of the last truly cheap W123s I could find anywhere in daily driver condition. Well, barely, but it’s been reliable over the course of a year even while I catch up on decades of deferred maintenance.
It’s an ’85 300D, US spec of course, so it’s not quite as speed challenged as that 200D. Though many of the horses have filed the stable which is something I haven’t turned my attention to yet. I suspect carbon buildup.
Even in the hotrod 300D, you have to push the pedal almost to the end of its travel to get it to really move anywhere. It’s certainly an unusual experience. Perhaps because of the long, heavy pedal, you’re never really in a hurry since the speed you’re going is probably adequate anyways. Yet you’re never far from flat out. Weirdly, this combines to form an incredibly relaxing driving experience where going a few MPH below the speed limit doesn’t bother you (though it will bother impatient Atlanta drivers).
I appreciate the accurate review. Looks absolutely lovely
Thank you. I dare say a 300D would feel like a rocket ship when stepping straight from a 200D! Even a 240D feels appreciably stronger. You’re spot on about the fact that the car doesn’t seem to mind being driven close to flat out, doesn’t mind it one bit in fact.
Picture here. Shame about the respray since nothing can match 80s Mercedes paint quality for sheer durability. Mine was also treated to a respray of such appallingly low quality that someone needs their spray gun taken away
It really is unfortunate. Looking at the “before” pictures, I’m quite sure that someone who knows what they are doing could have got the original finish back to a very good standard, negating the need for a respray. Oh well, what’s done is done.
Your car looks great, I’m a big fan of the round headlights on these.
Very nice vehicle. My first time saw the W123 was a extended limo from Marcus when I was still in China in early 80s. Later, the local high end hotels had a fleet of W123 diesel sedan for hotel car service. Besides it was a Mercedes, I have to say I was not that impressed. In the Southern China cities we had many Toyota Crown and Datsun Cerdic. I always want to know how W123 stands up against these two Japanese sedans. In term of longevity, the Japanese sedans would easily outmatch W123. More they had much better air conditioning units. For sure the driving dynamics and chassis rigidity, W123 was better. I believe the diesel Crown and Cerdic had a more powerful engine.
I have a bit of experience of the contemporary Crown and Cedric and to me they aren’t quite in the same league. Certainly on paper figures seem very similar, but up close they were nowhere near as solidly put together in my opinion. Mechanically they would be very reliable no doubt, but the bodies were quite rust prone over here.
I love that color combo. I have great respect for these, but the slowness would be a big drawback in present day traffic where I live. These are the Benz’s of my formative years, so this is what I think of when the marque is mentioned. I’ve ridden in quite a few, both diesel and petrol, and yes, even when well used they just ooze solidity and quality.
I for one prefer the color-keyed wheel covers over the bundt wheels. I might not have always felt that way, but from the current perspective of giant blinged-up alloys on everything I just think those classic wheel covers add a lot of charm to the whole of this car.
The slowness is less of a problem where I am, since average traffic speeds are so low. But even then, on a flowing road, you really need to build up and conserve momentum. On a Sunday test drive, that’s fun, but I don’t know whether it would get tiring in short order were one to daily drive one of these.
That car continues to show that a clean, simple design with durability; what’s not to like?? VERY NICE! Thanks for the write up. 🙂 DFO
Sometimes simple really can be best, right? Thanks for reading!
Very nice and yes, the 200D really was slow .
They sold them and the 230 gasoline version in Canada and once in a while one shows up here in California .
It’s worth noting that the 240D was the most popular taxi in the world during it’s long run .
I only have two W123’s left, my Sweet’s 300TD graymarket and my base model 240D, it too is leisurely but once going give very good driving fun in the twisty bits .
That ’85 isn’t a slow car by any means, time to adjust the valves, clean the ALDA switchover valve, banjo fittings and then clean the clear plastic boost sensing pipe before checking and adjusting the turbo’s boost , for a porky car it should scoot right along .
-Nate
It’s worth noting that the 240D was the most popular taxi in the world during it’s long run .
Not likely by a long shot. Outside of Germany hardly anyone bought a new W123 for taxi use, except maybe Austria. If you think of all the taxis of just the US and Japan, those two countries would have dwarfed the German taxi market. Then there’s the rest of the (very big world). Think Mexico City with a gazillion Beetles. I could go on.
They practically owned the long wheelbase cab market in Israel after Mopar and Checker departed. This is a typical Israeli street scene in the early 80s, Subarus and lwb M-B cabs were everywhere. But of course, compared with the examples you provided, sales were minuscule.
I was hoping you’d chime in, Nate, since I remembered you had a couple of W123s. The 200D actually redefined what “slow” was to me. I hopped in a 1300 Beetle after this and it felt like a racecar in comparison!
How many of these did you own over the years? My respect for them increases with time, but I would still pick a W124 myself I think.
Very nice write up on a car I’ve only ridden in as a taxi. Speaking of which, I think the bank vault analogy for the doors is a backwards. Since far more people have ridden in Mercedes taxis than have ever even touched a bank vault, I think the more appropriate wording is to compare the bank vault door to the Mercedes, not the other way around. So next time you check your safe deposit box – or rob a bank – you should be thinking “hey, this feels just like an old Mercedes”.
Thanks Dman. I never thought of it like that, but you raise a good point, haha!
Nice write-up. I love that color; I don’t think it was even offered in the US, but I could be wrong. If it was, it was certainly very rare. Europeans were much more into bold colors then whereas Americans were heading towards the current blandness.
Those “bold” colours can get on your nerves when flooding your visual senses. Believe me. I grew up in Europe in the 70s.
It is somehow the same as with bees: One or some may be nice, but a swarm of bees…
@Midsommar, oh I don’t know, it feels like the modern roadscape could use a dash of colour, don’t you think? Otherwise it’s just a endless sea of silver, black and grey, with the odd flash of white.
Well, you’re certainly right. It is too much in one way today – as it was too much in the other way, then.
Thanks Paul! This colour is pretty rare over here too. Don’t know if it was more common in period, but most W123s here were resprayed in duller “modern” hues in the last 15 years or so. It’s only now that people seem to be going back to period colours.
I walked through both Home Depot and Lowes recently, and the tiles for sale are shades of gray. Is everyone flipping houses for fun and profit?
I enjoyed this very much! As a kid, I had plenty of seat-time in a duo of W123 diesels. I’m sure that one of them (in a light shade of yellow) was a 240D and the other (in a light shade of green) was a 220D, IIRC. Neither of them was ours, BTW.
By no means ‘fast’ (indeed, What’s the Hurry, Anyway?) but they rolled, rolled and rolled. Just point the star in whatever direction you wanted to go.
CC Effect; on my morning neighborhood dog walk I saw a silver W123 300D. Not unusual in itself, but it was parked at the house of the patina-ed W108 that I posted recently. And while it wasn’t in perfect condition like this green 200D, it looked much better than the older 280SE 3.5. But the (non-Mercedes) piece de resistance was that the Cadillac CTS that’s normally in that driveway was also parked curbside, and in its place in the driveway was a shiny black VW Corrado G60. Now that’s a car I haven’t seen in a long time.
Lovely MB! I do really like it with hub caps. Very iconic.
When I worked as a graphic designer, I would consider a colour such as this very pure. Primarily yellow, less cyan, and magenta, and little black, if converted to CMYK colour.
CMYK calculator.
I have no experience with these, but in the late ’80s I had a friend that picked up a mint condition 280CE. Such a handsome car in and out, and it drove very nicely, but even this car with the gas engine made my Nissan seem quite peppy. Still, I wouldn’t mind having a 280CE now.
My 5th grade teacher drove a brown 240E that I thought was pretty cool – it was certainly unusual for Michigan. Then, she traded up to an ’87 or ’88 260E that was even cooler. She knew my mom so she took me along on a few errands so I could ride in it – I was king for a day.
These days, I like the styling of the 240 better, but I’ll take a fintail over either. Perfect color on this one, thanks for sharing.
Oh, I prefer the wheel covers. 🙂
“My 5th grade teacher drove a brown 240E …”
240E for sure ? Or was it a 240D (or a 230E) ?
Yep, it was a D. Fat fingers.
I also love the colour it now is, but if you look in the door-shuts of the original, the respray isn’t quite right. The MB original is more muted, and more familiar.
You describe the seating very nicely, both hard and springy (and, I’d add, pretty uncomfortable shapeless and prone to collapsing on the edges under cornering), but I have never sat for a long stretch in one, and so must accept it works well when used that way.
I can never decide if I love the W123 or think it’s a bit ridiculous. The super-solidity, the perceived quality, the looks, that interior, they all have great allure. But the concrete tyre feel, the road noise, the sloth (even in 2.8 form), the engine racket, things like the silly-stiff window winders – did any of these demerits actually make it a superior machine, or just a somewhat arrogant diktat from a company that demanded one accepted these things? I can never reach a conclusion, save this – the W124 fixes quite a few of my complaints, but has 80% lees character.
As to wheels, here’s my penny’s worth: Bundts are only for muted-colour absolute top-line models, everthing else, and especially bright colours like this one, the wheelcaps.
Nice article, sir.
European-delivered 280E models from 1978 onwards produced 185hp from 3218 pounds, so not slothful. Particularly given that the twin-cam M110 engine also revved to 5800 rpm even with the automatic transmission.
Road noise is generally a function of 30 year old door seals which are not representative of the vehicle’s performance when new or in normal service.
For what it’s worth, Mercedes only fitted the alloy wheels to the 280E/TE models and coupe models as standard, choosing the wheel trims for all other models (including the long wheelbase stretch models) as standard equipment.
If you ever had to choose one car to see you out, a Benz would be a likely candidate, and for me a W123, perhaps a 280TE would be the precise one.
Even so, I can see an appeal – it may be slow against a watch but in busy city traffic that’s unlikely to be a truly significant issue – you end behind the same chap at the next lights anyway.
But the wheel trims and colour make it for me. So what if it cost more than a Rover 3500 SD1 and was equipped like a Frankfurt taxi, the standard of the paint alone was probably worth the difference.
Also, is the Peugeot 406 Coupe yours? Looks good!
Not being familiar with these vehicles: what is the function of the hand grip to the right of the steering wheel?
Since the vehicle is parked, it makes me think auxiliary brake. Sorry for the silly question.
The parking brake release handle.
Great write up and photos as always. Here in Toronto if you see an old Mercedes it’s usually one of these, and it’s often a 240 or 300D. I’ve always liked the styling of these particular Mercs, and they still look good today. There’s nothing flashy about them – they’re simply a well designed and built machine that still has character. The fact that so many are still around is a testament to their design and quality. I think many of them will still be on the road when their modern contemporaries have been recycled a few times over.
Oh wow glow plugs I’d forgotten briefly about those and the wait my Citroen Xsara had glow plugs and turn the key upon entry then put on the seatbelt and it would start, great little engines and almost burst proof,
More modern diesels just start common rail atomisation really works and the slow aspect is gone a twin scroll turbo takes care of that,
Mercedes that old are rare in NZ and were horrifically expensive new
Ugh, such a shame about the repaint. Do people not understand how good the factory paint is?
Two hours with a polisher and it’s as good as new and far more durable than any second paintjob.