As you frequent readers know, the CC graveyard in Eugene is extensive, (click here to read Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5) but would you believe there is a British CC junkyard here in the Midwest? In Brougham Central? Well, it’s not all British cars – there’s a Falcon, an ’80s Supra and some VWs, but yes, it is true. I know, I’ve been there.
I recently was able to access this eclectic collection of parts cars after hearing about it from my brother. It is not a big place, but it has some pretty interesting remains of yesteryear. For instance, this Jaguar S-Type. Produced from 1963 to 1968, it was intended as a slightly fancier version of the venerable 3.8 Jaguar Mark II, and in fact was a Mark II save for a new roofline, rear quarters and trunklid. It didn’t really take off though, and only about 25,000 were sold in six model years. It’s hard to see in the photo, but the one visible wheel is sporting a redline tire, like a late ’60s muscle car.
What reputable British car yard would be without an MGB? This one actually still looks fairly solid. Just to its left is a 1966-70 Ford Falcon coupe. And we’ll get to that orange doorstop shortly.
These early to mid ’80s Supras have all but disappeared in the Midwest, so I was happy to see a survivor here. These used to be very common in the ’80s and early ’90s, even around here.
Here we have a very weathered Jaguar “Mark I” sedan. It was actually called either the 2.4 or 3.4 Litre by Jaguar, but when the legendary Mark II came out, the earlier versions were retroactively called Mark Is. They are most easily distinguished from Mark IIs by thicker door pillars.
Though very rough, the 2.4 Litre is in better shape than the S-Type, as it still has all its glass and most of its interior – including the wood dash.
These cars were very nice looking, and one of the first really sporting four door sedans. Before this car, sport sedans were rather few and far between. In a way, the current XF is the spiritual successor to this car, as it fills a similar market niche.
Most of the trim is there, including the Leaper and the grille badge, which confirms this car is a 2.4 Litre. This car has a lot of character, even in its current state. The XF I previously mentioned, although attractive for a modern car, looks like a bar of soap next to one of these.
This is the first TR8 convertible I’ve seen in a long time. The TR8 was essentially a TR7 with the Rover V8 instead of an inline four, and a convertible joined the coupe at the same time. It was too late for Triumph though, and the TR8 would be the last sporting Triumph. Let us not speak of the rebadged Honda Accord known as the Triumph Acclaim. Acclaim? Really? Oh, those wild and crazy guys at BL.
Here’s another MGB, looking a little more tattered than the BRG one nearby. Looks like the same color orange as the TR8. And remember the oh so ’70s “MGB” stripe? I’ve seen a restored one with that stripe and it looks pretty good.
This Spitfire looks like its taking a nap, with the XJ6 hood over it to keep it warm – and protecting it from bird target practice, apparently.
Here’s another photo of that S-Type. As you can see, the interior is basically nonexistent, though the steering wheel looked nice. It still had the horn ring and Jaguar emblem too.
How about a “Bugeye” Sprite? Oh, it does need a few parts though. That Beetle on the right was a pretty solid convertible, although in need of a new top. I always liked orange Beetles, they just look so cheerful. It also has the accessory styled steel wheels, as also seen on contemporary Karmann-Ghias and 914s.
Here’s a TR3, looking much more complete than the Sprite nearby. Do you know what car is sitting to its right?
It was hard to tell at first, but I’m pretty sure it’s a ’70s Triumph TR6 – a severely smashed one. That chrome tubing and blue square towards the top is the trunklid and accessory luggage rack. Something very big rearranged this poor car. I hope no one was in it at the time.
I actually thought it was a Spitfire, but as I was writing this article, I noticed that the hood doesn’t extend down to the sides. The remains of the rear taillight and what I can see of the instrument panel changed my mind.
If you love E-Types, you may want to skip the next few pictures. Yes, there were a couple here. This one looks to be a Series 1, as it has the smaller taillights above the bumpers. It may be missing its front end. There was so much vegetation it was hard to tell for sure.
This one, like the S-Type, has no interior, though in this shot you can see the tachometer is still there.
This may be the saddest one. It clearly had an engine fire at some point in time, and looked to be in good condition before that happened. The paint and chrome – what was left – still looked pretty nice. Shame.
Towards the front of the lot was a bunch of parts engines. I think this one is an XJ6 engine, but I’m not sure.
Further down the row was an upside-down Jaguar straight six. I know this one was a Jag engine as the side of the block is stamped with a vintage Jaguar logo. If you click on the photo, you’ll probably see it.
The shop also had some cars for sale outside. I especially liked this late ’80s 924S, complete with the classic “Porsche” rocker lettering. While the 944s were nice, I like the combination of the original 924 styling and phone-dial alloys. Nice cars, and underappreciated today. I’m sure Syke will agree, since he owns one.
I will end our visit with an especially odd couple – an ’80s Alfa Romeo Spyder and a ’63 Rambler Classic. A Rambler? What’s a Rambler doing here? Well, I’m glad it is, as these cars are rarely seen these days. And it’s a ’63, with the classier front end that was lost in the ’64 restyle. Hope you enjoyed your tour. And now back to our regularly scheduled Curbside Classic…
Very nice collection. The British stuff all look pretty much like good for parts only except for that green wire wheel MG B. The TR8 is a real shame – not too many of those around. They had upgraded brakes and power steering over the TR7 as well. Minor correction though – the TR7 was a four cylinder not six.
The stripe was responsible for the extra 1/2-horsepower on the rubber bumper models.
I really like that Datsun hood on the old TR. Works well.
Ah, the Midwest junkyard scene has changed over the years! In ’72, I wrecked the aluminum hood of my MGB due to a piss-poor lane change on my part. I called around the western suburban Chicago-area yards and one guy said he had a hood for an MG. Yeah, MG1100, but no MGB. At that time, the Austin America (clone to the 1100) was barely in the market, while Bs were fairly common. Not sure where the MGBs went to die, but it wasn’t in Naperville…
Found a hood from an MG enthusiast. He had a sweet TC, but that was out of my league.
That 924S is slightly nicer than mine. Mine’s got a couple of ripples on the hood that are going to get taken out when the car gets its complete repaint. And yes, somebody really needs to pick that car up. They are SO underrated. Less than five grand gets you a genuine Porsche and a car that will outhandle 95% of everything on the road today.
And they ain’t THAT expensive to maintain . . . .
Little pedantic point: The TR-7 was a four cylinder (aka, the Saab motor).
That Mark I and S-Type just about had me in tears. Somebody, somewhere has got to do something with what are the quintessential English cars. As to the XK-E’s (when did we start calling them E-types? I remember them being called XK-E in American when they were new), another couple to cry over, although those cars tend to be so expensive to rebuild . . . . . .
My jaw was on the desk at the sight of the TR-3 (as opposed to TR-3A, the former are much rarer).
Be nice- SAAB used a 1700, then 1850cc version of the Triumph engine. SAAB came out with their own version, a 2-liter, for 1973. The SAAB engine had regular head bolts (YAY!!!) & was a MUCH better engine. The only parts that interchanged were the valve adjustment shims.
Story was that SAAB, not yet ready to build their own 4-stroke engine, got together with Triumph for this engine. That’s one reason the water pump is on the top, near the middle- SAAB put the engine in backward.
The engine was introduced, Triumph was ecstatic, SAAB was appalled. SAAB tried different rings with the Hepolite pistons supplied and they ended up pulling the tops off of the pistons. They went to Mahle pistons for the 1850.
AFIAK, no one has ever figured out how to get the head gaskets to seal, or how to remove the head studs after they had “welded” themselves into place.
Stuck head studs not exclusive to Triumph; I’ve seen MkX Jaguars hung off the ground by the head while mechanic tried to get the studs to let go.
That railroad embankment brings back memories of a similarly situated wrecking yard north of Des Moines, Iowa, that some of us car guys visited once. Then a couple of nights later we walked along the railroad track from a neighboring backroad and came down the embankment into the yard. Hmm…now that I think about it, there was one like that in Auburn, Washington too.
Poor old Jags and TR’s…there were way more of both imported into this country to meet their ends at the hands of US car owners, than there will ever be lovers and restorers of either.
I was prepared to hate this post because I’d be sad to see CC doing ongoing exercises in automotive necrophilia similar to those already on TTAC — it’s much nicer to read about survivors than have to view battered, stripped corpses, which is just depressing. But the quality of Tom’s photos made this special, just as it has in his posts on toy cars.
For us, junkyards are sacred spaces, and we don’t violate them unless there’s a really good reason. CC is a celebration of life, even if it’s a doddering one.
I look at this yard and imagine being greeted by a guy in a khaki shirt with “Wot lit be Gov’nr?” then asking if I brought my own spanners. I love it.
I agree some of those cars need to be rescued, but not the “S” Type. They never looked quite right when they were new. They sold quite well in Britain, but were much dearer than the Mk11, having “E”-Type rear suspension instead of a live axle. A brief drive of an “S” was what got me hooked on Jags in the 60s.
Hyacinth Bucket had a Triumph Acclaim (Honda Civic) in “Keeping Up Appearances.”
I’m glad nobody swiped the “leaper” off of that MK I.
Close but no cigar: she had an ’87 “SD3” Rover 216.
Understandable confusion since the “SD3” like the Acclaim was also a badge engineered Honda Ballade – just the next generation thereof (since the Triumph marque was firmly in the toilet by then, it was sold as a Rover instead)
@ billy rockfish
Actually the Buckets drove around in a Rover 200 not a Triumph. I never heard the engine nor saw the badge so can’t say if it is the Honda-engined 213 or the 216 with the Rover S-type engine.
Either way, the Rover was a much classier ride than the Acclaim. The Rover had much more British input than the Acclaim which was not much more than a re-badging exercise.
That engine fire’ed E-type is a 2+2, so don’t shed too many tears. 😉
Hi looking for the hood panel for a 1972 Triumph Spitfire Mk4. Side fender condition not important as I am looking for the centre panel only. Anyone out there have one for sale?
I was wondering if you guys can help me. My name is Daniel Frankle. I’m in thje middle of restoring a what I thought was a 1976 triumph spitfire. When I purchased the car the tiile and regi and commision tag was handed to me in an envelope. Which now I have lost . With no com tag I can’t even apply for a title because I need the numbers
I’m not even sure if the stuff that was given to me with the car is correct.. There are no other tags or stamps on the car except for egine and tranny numbers. As best as I can tell the windshield says it’s a 1973
Is there anybody out there that I can buy the paperwork and comm tag or should I just sell what I have for parts and take the loss
Looking for a triumph spitfire engine do you have any and. What about shipping to sun City az. 85351. Near Phoenix. Rick.
looking for parts – mainly tail light lens for a 1949 standard vanguard
any help is appreciated
donsheckler67@gmail.com
oregon
looking for a front windshield, 1990 jaguar vander plas majestic
Hi.
I am restoring a 61 bugeye and i see you have a shell. Can it be purchased?
Hello, I am looking for a Mark 3 mini for parts.
I have owned dozens of British cars over the years but don’t currently have any. I do have a 1967 Volvo P1800S that I am restoring and I need the wiring in the trunk. The 1800 series used lots of Lucas and British Leyland parts and the wiring (same color codes and bullet connectors) is one of them. I am looking for the rear harness from an MGB (most any year with the vinyl sheathe) to rewire mine. That would be the sub-harness for the tail, turn, reverse and license plate lights. Can you help me with that?
HI, I’m looking for a set of alloy wheels for a 1980 TR7. Do ya have anything like that.
Thanks, Dan