Filing has never been my strong point, and my grasp on it weakens with the passing of the years. The photo files of my models are organized by decades; well, except for this century which is just all lumped into one file. I can get away with that as I don’t build many newer vehicles. Are there fewer kits of them? Quite possibly, but I don’t often go looking. New cars are not as interesting to me as they used to be, plus there are still older cars that captivate me that I haven’t built.
And also, there are older cars I want to build more of! Just this week I finished a Nissan Gloria 330 (’75), a ‘companion’ to the Cedric 330 I built twenty years ago. Can I stop at two? Possibly, but possibly not: see Edsel…. Or maybe Don’t: see also 1953 Studebaker, 1956 Ford, 1958 Plymouth, 1960 Ford, 1961 Chevy. And others. You get the idea. If I like it, I’ll build it again.
But searching through my photo files, it’s hard not to notice that certain years have more models than others. Case in point: 1970, when I was a car-mad thirteen-year-old.
So, let’s get started.
Here’s a Mustang Boss 302, taken outside on a sunny afternoon a few summers back. Forty-odd years back I went mad building Mustangs for a while, and after seeing this in the catalog I asked an obliging shopkeeper to get four of these in for me. Wisely he halved that. Initially done as a Boss 429 (engine overkill?), about ten years back Revell revised the kit to produce a Boss 302 and this Mach 1 (with 351 Cleveland, just to be different). Three versions of the kit, with three different engines.
Having started with this Mustang (filed under B for Boss), we might as well keep looking for interesting Fords. Maybe a Torino? Two? Because I like them. Especially in Ford Australia’s muscle-era colours. IIRC these are Red Pepper and Sherwood Green;
We’ll give the Maverick a miss, but here’s a Mercury Comet;
About now the Chevy guys will be going “How about a…?” Relax. This is the ‘new tool’ Z28 from the nineties, when AMT were going through something of a golden age. Much better than their 1970-vintage kit, which still reappears from time to time (shakes head);
Here’s a bonus Chevelle. Another of Monogram’s early-eighties muscle car kits;
A Monte Carlo. Another excellent nineties AMT kit;
And a Caprice. This one’s an AMT annual kit (dates from 1970) that periodically reappears in the catalog, here showing off that unusual roofline;
Crossing over to Pontiac, we have the Firebird. I didn’t want to go for the too-common white-with-blue-stripe look, so reversed it;
We have to look at the GTO. Here’s a gold one. Once again, there are others…
And how about a big red convertible? Only one of these Bonnevilles;
Oldsmobile, you ask? That would be filed under 442;
No ’70 Buicks in my collection, we’ll have to wait until I do 1971, but there is this Cadillac Eldorado, an old Johan annual;
Time for some Mopars. I’ll admit they’re my favourites, partly because of the wild colours offered, but also the styling. Let’s start with a Challenger first; top down, I think.
Okay, I cheated on the colour. This one’s Aussie Ford Tropicana Green from that period, one of my favourites.
And maybe a coupe. Here’s a yellow T/A. I can’t recall which yellow I used here;
I don’t have a ’70 Cuda built (yet), but here’s a Road Runner. I could have used Sassy Grass Green or Lime Light, but didn’t have them handy;
And from Dodge, a Super Bee with that wild front end. I couldn’t believe it when I saw it in a magazine – they actually produced that! And fancy calling a colour Go Mango;
Of course I also did one in Panther Pink. Had to, just had to…
Now there are plenty of other muscle-era Mopar models, but they all appear to be ’68s, ‘69s (Darts, Road Runners, Chargers…) or ‘71s (Dusters, GTXs, more Chargers…) We’ll catch up with those another time. Not next time though; I’ll keep you guessing.
Wow that is quite the collection, a friend paints toy soldiers – much prefer your hobby! Anyway a room mate in college had a :Heavy Chevy” which looked quite like your model, unfortunately it got wrrecked early, no one got hurt – it was still driveable so he drove the hell out of it until the insurance came in – scarey.
Thanks Robert. It must’ve been great to have a car like that Heavy Chevy, but also a great temptation. And modern cars are so much faster still! How fast is fast enough?
IKWYM about moderns – cars of that era just make for such lovely models.
Never mind all the space wasted in front of the radiator panel – the crazy shapes & colours make it all worthwhile.
Indeed, Nick. As I was writing this, I wasn’t sure how much of the appeal for me was those shapes and colours, and how much was the memories of my teenage years coming back to me. The wasted space – well, that was something I could never quite understand, why you would want to cart around so much needless bulk. Different cultures…..
Your models never fail to impress me. Nice work!
Thank you. Looking at some of these, I think I need to improve my photography though. 🙂
Peter,
You failed to mention that the ’70 Super Bee is an absolute POS to build. They combined at least 2 different kits together and they are not compatible. It looks like you made it work.
Didn’t see a Revell ’70 Hemi Cuda which is a pretty good kit.
I built a ’67 Eldorado back when that JoHan kit was new, the ’70 is very close but those kits are too precious for me to buy at auction site.
Regards
Thanks Dave. There’s a lot of stuff I don’t mention. I try to strike a balance between a superficial pictorial and geekish detail. And sometimes my treatment is a bit uneven, I’ll admit.
But about the Super Bee, yes, it combines the body of the old ’70 annual kit (MPC?) with the much more detailed chassis of AMT’s ’68 and ’69 which were nineties tools. The problem is with the interior; the contours of the bottom of the old interior bucket don’t match the contour of the top side of the chassis pan. This needs a fair bit of grinding, cutting and filing. Or super glue. While this can be done, AMT really should have addressed this issue before releasing the kit. I see a lot of complaints from younger modellers online about this sort of thing. Standards and expectations are much higher in 2024; we expect part to fit without need for modification. Other companies do it…..
The Revell Hemi Cuda? I just haven’t built one yet. I did so many Monogram ’71s (you’ll see them some other time) that I’ve been trying to think of a different colour for it.
The Eldo was built about forty years ago, I can’t afford ‘collector’ prices either!
I can’t get enough of those 70 Torinos!
So here’s another one! 🙂
More fantastic examples here – I’m continually impressed by these.
My favorites here are probably the Torinos, especially the red and yellow car. This is a great design, still exciting looking after all these years, and the model kit seems startlingly realistic. I see what you mean too about the New Tool Z28 – even from the photo it’s clearly a high-quality kit.
Thanks again for sharing!
The Revell-Monogram Ford Torino Talledega, an absolute pleasure to build.
The Tallladega’s a different kit based on the ’69, also good.
And another Torino for you too, Eric! Thanks.
1970 was such a great year for styling! The recent CC article on that generation of Torino had me looking closer at them. That whole period of Ford styling in the early ’70s before it went all-in on brougham was a great one. All of the Detroit three (then the “Big Three”) all had some great looks, well represented in your beautifully assemble and detailed models. Thanks for sharing them!
I wonder how many models of models built in Australia would be available for purchase here in the U.S. without the use of the Internet!
Joseph, I’ve always loved the shape of these Torinos (you can tell?). And I agree this era marked a high point in styling.
The Brougham look made me aware of the cultural differences betwen the US and Australia. While we had high-trim luxury models, we never went for the whole formal-styling tombstone-grille opera-window look. We didn’t buy big coupes. We were more inclined to take design inspiration (and suspension tune) from Europe.
In many ways the Prebroughamian Era was a golden age.
One last Torino…..
Peter,
I’m thinking the Mad Max car (Aussie Falcon??) must be in your stash as well
Actually no, Dave!
Aoshima does a Mad Max kit, but it’s not often in the lineup and seems to sell out very quickly. (Maybe production is limited by the licensing agreement?) There’s no stock kit, and most of the resin bodies I’ve seen have an inaccurate roofline, using measurements off what looks like the sedan height windshield, which gives the roof an off-looking front to back slope. Oh I could fix it, if I was more confident with working in resin, but I’m not going to pay over double a plastic kit price for an inaccurate body. That’s not to say there isn’t an accurate body out there, just that I haven’t seen one available to buy when I’ve had the money.
And that’s why I’ve built six Torinos! 🙂
Was that Olds Cutlass/442 the JoHan kit? I built that, painted a bright orange, with some matte black trim if I remember right.
Yes, Man, that sure is the Johan kit. Here’s another one…..
I have a friend who is a hobby dealer. He says that the major model companies are planning on releasing and reissuing older classic kits and ‘annuals’. The reason? Car model fans do not have too much interest in building ‘contemporary’ SUVs or crossovers. Keep the classic older kits `comin!
Phil, I would have to agree. I’d guess I’m in about 20 online model groups based in about five different countries, and I find the same thing. New supercars and hypercars, yes, but even then they tend to be a minority. SUVs and crossovers, no. I think AMT got burnt with their last Explorer kit; kids no longer want to build what their parents drive, and I don’t blame them. I could wax philosophical about that, but I think we all could! Much the same with pickups too; they were popular kits in the nineties, and we had three different companies do the ‘curvy’ ’97-’04 F150, while nobody did the next generation. There was a flurry of interest with the first big-rig style Ram from Revell, but later ones weren’t done.
Whether Japanese, European, American, Aussie or New Zealanders, I see builders more inclined to look to the past for subjects.
Outstanding.
Thank you.
Wow, these are amazing! As one who was always terrible at putting models together, I am genuinely impressed and envious of your skills. I had no idea that some of these were even available to build.
Thanks Chris. Not all of these are available today, but are the culmination of about 55 years of building.
I’m a 1970 model myself, great year for car design for sure, the Boss Mustang, Chevelle SS, and the Firebird are stand outs not to mention the Roadrunner. Outstanding work all around
Thanks Newt. It would have been really, really hard to choose a car if you were of driving age in the US in 1970. And there’d be that hard question: how much engine do I really need?
I built the Challenger T/A and a 70 GTX back in the 80s, they didn’t survive my sometimes tumultuous younger years.
My heart is usually with Mopars but I am starting to really appreciate the big GM dreamboats as I age, their appeal comes across in the model kits as well.
Interesting wheels on the road runner.
Those wheels on the Road Runner were supposed to represent the Mopar cop car steelies, but word was that the holes weren’t right. When released, the kit came with the ‘regular’ styled steel wheels; udated versions got these.
These are amazing; love all the wild colors!
1970 was quite a year (and my high school graduation year as well).
Thanks. When I do 1971, there’ll be another dose of wild colours
Your work is as impressive as always. I especially like the use of authentic 1970 colors, such as the rust-colored Camaro, the brown Monte Carlo, and the various Torinos, including the color fade decals! I especially like the green Challenger convertible, even if it’s not painted in authentic 1970 Chrysler hue.
Have you seen a kit for a 1970 Fairlane 500 coupe, with the more sedan-like roofline? They seemed to be more common back in the 1970s, but the model makers seem to prefer the SportsRoof variant, even though they were much less often seen on the roads back then.
Thanks William. I’ve always been the look out for good colours I can use and the late sixties to mid seventies seem to be the peak years for colour. Up until about the late nineties, many of these colours were still available from Duplicolor down here in Australia. I don’t visit car parts stores much these days, but the colour range is almost as boring as what you see on the road nowadays. Maybe half a dozen of Ford’s best colours from back then were still in stock; popular hot rod colours I think.
I know the ’70 Fairlane coupe you mean. I don’t think they ever did that body back in the day; a friend had the AMT annual kit from ’71 and it had the same bodystyle as the current Revell kit. Possibly the body might be available in resin, but that’s not really my scene, so I can’t say.
These never fail to amaze me. They are simply beautiful.
And the time that you must spend detailing them-very impressive.
I love the variety and the articles as well.
Keep up the great work.
Thank you, CD3. I’ve always had an eye for detail (and colour, I now realize), but having said that I don’t go to the extremes some guys do. I think of Steve’s engine bays, or Tonio’s paint, or…. But I’m having fun.
Variety? Stay tuned! There’s a few themes coming up I haven’t addressed before. I’m not quite sure what I’ll write on next.