(first posted 10/23/2017) This Porsche 924 recently took up residence in front of the misnamed Willow Tree Apartments. We’ve walked by several times, but I just didn’t have the urge to break our pace to stop and shoot it, having shot others years ago. But then yesterday it was joined by this very complimentary Volvo 244. What a fine pair they make; sleek and boxy. If this was a mid-century house instead of the Willow Tree, it would look like the setting for an upscale family’s set of cars from about 1980.
I had wrongly assumed that we must have long done a proper CC on the 924. We haven’t, although we got pretty close here. And we did a Vintage Road Test of a 924 Turbo here. Well, a thorough look at the 924 is going to have to wait for another day, but let’s give it a bit of a tribute.
A quick review of its origins: The 924 originally came about because Volkswagen and Porsche both needed/wanted a replacement for their joint venture, which had been created for the 914, sold by both companies in Europe, and only by Porsche in the US. The 914 was none too successful in Europe (more so in the US), so development of a replacement was undertaken by Porsche, as part of their long-running contract with VW to develop new concepts and build prototypes, but the components came from VW’s vast parts catalog.
In 1973, VW and Porsche dissolved their joint venture, and the project (EA425) rightly landed back with VW who had been footing the envelopment bills, to the tune of some $70 million. VW CEO Rudolf Leiding planned to sell it as either an Audi or VW, but not as a Porsche, which threw Porsche into a bit of a panic.
But in 1974, a very difficult year for VW, Leiding suddenly left. New VW General Manager Toni Schmucker needed to cut costs and re-focus, and VW was already overextended bringing their new FWD Golf and Passat to market, so he sold back the rights to the EA425 to Porsche, for $60 million, but with some concessions to VW regarding where it would be produced. Meaning it had to be built at a VAG-owned factory (the former NSU plant at Neckersulm), and staffed by VW employees. Essentially, VW was building a car full of their own parts, engine and technology for Porsche to sell. And so Porsche did, and it sold pretty well, and became a key component of Porsche’s big expansion in the late-70s, along with the 928.
The VW parts bin raiding was to be seen everywhere under its sleek skin. The 924 used a rear transaxle, but the torsion bar semi-trailing arm suspension was borrowed from the Beetle, and the half shafts came from the 181. The rear transmission only had four forward gears initially, and that was a shortcoming, given the rather weak-chested engine. The new Audi three-speed automatic was also available, a first for Porsche, but an important part of making the 924 accessible to young professional women in the US, who suddenly saw a Porsche as a hot brand and just needed to have one. And it was relatively affordable to them, starting at $9,395 in 1977 ($38k adjusted). I saw plenty of that demographic in red 924s in LA at the time; sort of the update on the secretary’s Mustang in 1965.
The 924’s VW engine was an evolution of the first Audi four stroke four designed by Mercedes. Yes, the auto industry in Germany has always been a bit incestuous; it’s no surprise they recently got charged with collusion by the German federal prosecutor. Doh! In this case, the displacement was upped to 2 liters, and the pushrod head gave way to a new SOHC head. The same basic engine also found its way into the VW LT van, as well as AMC Gremlins, Spirits and Concords (AMC was going to build it themselves, but only just imported them for a few years).
Making 95, 110 or 115 hp for the US market (depending on year), the 924 was faulted for its modest performance. Even the somewhat more powerful European version was dunned for the same shortcoming, but handling, steering and brakes were almost universally praised.
The first step in dealing with the 924’s performance deficit appeared in 1979, in the form of the 924 Turbo. It brought a big jump in power, to 170 hp, along with a big jump in cost. It turned out that the sweet spot lay somewhere in between, in the form of the 944.
Needless to say, these early 924s were a starting point, and did not belie their humble VW origins, as this picture makes clear. But over the 20 years that this platform was steadily developed by Porsche into the 944 and 968, it morphed into something rather different. And much more expensive.
The 924 was a surprising car for Porsche to build sell, its first with a front engine, and water-cooled at that. A year later, the similarly laid-out 928 arrived. The two of them were to eventually replace the 911, which was considered to be obsolete. We all know how that turned out.
I’m not sure of the exact year of this Volvo or the 924, as Carfax drew a blank with both of them. But as best as I can tell, 1981 was the first year for the quad rectangular headlights in the US. What can I add that hasn’t been said here before?
The front end design isn’t exactly refined or sleek, by any measure. Might as well be a Buick Century. But then the Volvo sort of was a Swedish Buick.
This one is proudly sporting a Lambda Sond badge. Volvo was the first to use this, an oxygen sensor, co-developed with Bosch, a critical (and soon universal) device to provide feedback to the fuel injection system in order to allow the catalytic converter operate at maximum effectiveness. Prior to it, catalytic converters were “dumb”, and their effectiveness limited. The oxygen sensor was the single most important breakthrough to allow gasoline engines to meet the much tighter EPA standards of 1980 and beyond.
I owned a 1983 GLE very briefly, like a few weeks. When the five year company lease on my ’86 MB 300E was about to expire in 1991, the buy-out amount specified in the lease seemed to stiff for me, and my neighbor was getting rid of their cream-puff Volvo. So I bought it for some very reasonable amount.
It obviously wasn’t in the same league dynamically as the W124 with its creamy smooth and powerful six and very advanced suspension, but there was something inherently charming about the Volvo that suited me fairly well. I’ve always preferred narrow but tall cars, and the 244 certainly was that. The ride was a bit cruder, and the 2.3 L four made its presence known, but not objectionably. It worked fine for me for my 20 minute freeway commute, but any thought of replicating high-speed weekend joy rides were out.
As it turned out, the leasing company was willing to very substantially drop their price for the 300E, so I just couldn’t resist and bought it. Fortunately another neighbor really wanted the Volvo too, so it was easy to pass it along. But I left it with fond memories, and I’m rather surprised I never ended up with another. A 240 wagon would have made a practical car for me after our move to Eugene. Of course that’s what at least half of the parents at the Waldorf school drove back then.
This 244 is in the care of loving hands: Artisan seat covers.
As timeless and durable as a redwood tree.
1980: One to impress the neighbors, the other to drive. You get to pick which.
I have no experience with the 944 and very little with the Volvo, outside of a law school roommate who was infatuated with them. I went on a couple of test drives with him. At the time I thought it was not that much car for too much money. I have since come under their spell. I found a great wagon when my son was looking for a car, but he nixed it right away – no station wagons need apply. I should have bought it for myself.
Nice finds. Not really being a Porsche-phile, I did not know of VW’s involvement in the 924. And I don’t recall ever seeing a “Lambda Sond” badge, either, so all kinds of new things for me here.
Having lived with a 924S, this is a car that I cannot possibly praise highly enough, have enough wonderful memories of, and want back badly enough.
And to think I traded it in on a Solstice? What was I thinking? Definitely goes down as my stupidest car trade ever.
A couple of days ago, the site ran the article that “the answer is always Miata.” Maybe to you. Substitute 924/944 in there, and I can easily agree with the statement.
And I’m starting to get tinges of selling my 500c Abarth and taking the money to find another 924/944 – only with less mileage this time, in a bit better condition.
The Volvo looks fairly big in these pictures but I’m always surprised by how “compact” they look when you see one on the road.
Of these 2, the Volvo gets a thumbs down from me for having an automatic transmission AND 4 doors. I won’t even consider a Volvo wagon unless it has a manual transmission.
The Porsche? A bit rough around the edges…so to speak but in this case that gives it a bit of character like the Porsche in that Paul Newman / Harper movie.
Very great finds together!
If I had encountered that 924, I’d have shot it the first time I saw it – with a .30-06, both barrels. I had the misfortune to own one briefly when I was a bachelor and it was a real letdown for my first exposure to that marque. Matter of fact, because of that car it was my ONLY exposure to that marque.
The Volvo, on the other hand – I inherited my dad’s 1990 Volvo 240 upon his death six years ago. Built like a 1950s Nash. Fixed a few things he was too cheap to fix, got the windows tinted for Florida sun (looks great, white with black-tinted greenhouse), and it’s my wife’s daily driver now. Woe be to he or she who ever damages it says SWMBO.
Lgbpop,
You interested in selling that 240? Let me know – I’m a classic RWD Volvo enthusiast.
My Dad had a friend who bought one of the first 924 Turbo’s (1981ish?) and he would echo your sentiments. Guy took good care of that car, as it was a big chunk of change for him then, and I think it was about 6 years old when something to do with the turbo decided to quit without a two week notice. So Mark takes it to Porsche, and is told we found the problem, but the part needed is backorderd. It took four months before it arrived. Apparently the service advisor explained Porsche was waiting for a large enough order request before they would make a new batch. Furious at this point, he had the car fixed and promptly unloaded it.
Not quite the same thing, but the 4 month wait for a critical part and the possibility that Porsche was waiting for a substantial demand to build up brought back memories of my Audi owning experience.
And yeah, I dumped that car ASAP, and never looked back. I also am extremely reluctant to recommend any Audi product…though if I won the lottery I might take a chance with an R8.
Paul,
The green Volvo is definitely a 1980. I could immediately tell because it still has the old 1973-vintage instrument cluster and dash from the 140 Series. Also, that particular 4-spoke steering wheel was introduced for ’80, and there is an 85-mph speedometer present. 1975-79 240s used speedos that went up to 130 mph.
Thanks. So my stab at the headline was right. 🙂
I had an ’80 DL, so I know 2 other traits of that model year — the last to use bright trim around the side windows (after that, it was blacked out) and the first to use the black outside rearview mirrors that could be adjusted (manually with a lever) from inside the car.
Another giveaway – the green ’80 is a GL model. 1980 GLs and GLEs (V-6 models) were the only 240s to have square, rectangular sealed-beam headlamps and a full chrome grille (albeit plastic). Entry-level DL models used round sealed-beam lamps and a black matte grille with chrome surround.
I immediately knew the car was a GL just by looking at the door lock buttons, which were chrome-plated on all GLs.
These two look good for their age, don’t they?
The two of them were to eventually replace the 911, which was considered to be obsolete. We all know how that turned out.
Not only that, I’ve come across a few 928s and many 924/944s ones the years at bottom of the barrel self service junkyards, in fact I know where two are as I type this. 911s? Nope. Even though these became good sports cars they just never shook the “not a real Porsche” stigma, and just kind of became disposable.
Really what the 911 provided(still does, mostly) is a truly distinctive driving experience, with a penchant for enthusiast loving/public scaring oversteer. Front engine/rear drive sports cars was a saturated market, and while early on I’m sure a 944 sold at a premium in large part to the prestige of the badge, as they got older(and needed work) how much better in any measure are they really than an 80s Toyota Supra or Mazda RX7, or a Miata for that matter, that all cost nearly the same depreciated?
And that image has never gone away with the 911-nose-in-the-air crowd. I used to get a good giggle taking mine to European car shows, and parking them in the Porsche section to the obvious discomfort of everybody else there. All of whom, of course, were showing 356’s or 911’s.
I enjoyed it. I’d much rather have a front engined Porsche.
I recall from my parts days at a Audi/Porsche dealership the 924’s front lower control arms were the same part number as the Rabbit/ 1st gen Golf used. Front wheel drive wishbones used on a rear wheel drive car. I believe also (as I recall) the balljoint’s were also the same as the Rabbit’s.
Family member had a ’89 244 DL 5 speed for a few years. No speed demon or corner carver, but was still running well and only in need of a clutch when she sold it at 265k miles. It held up well, even being run with the oil pressure lamp being her add oil indicator until I educated her after adding 3 quarts!
Yes these cars are now very cheap. I was at consignment car lot yesterday, and saw a very nice 16 valve 944 Sport. The car was in quite good shape, I like these cars but I couldn’t get used to the steering wheel rubbing the top of my legs. I think that the budget Porsche is the Boxster, I saw a 98 model that was going for 5,900.00. I saw some very nice ones (2000+ MY) going for around 10,000. Not a bad price though I know that the early models had quite serious engine problems. I would imagine that they were fixed under warranty at the time or have been scrapped by now.
What did the 944 Sport bring — or didn’t it sell ?
So it’s a redwood! My first guess was a stressed out cedar. But cedar branches don’t hang like that. We don’t have redwoods in Washington state.
No, it’s not a redwood. I was just keeping the misnaming game going. 🙂
It is a cedar. There’s a lot of different varieties of them out here.
A neighbor bought a 924 in the very early 80s…silver, these same wheels, it was sort of a “turbo-look” car but not an actual turbo. Traded in a late 70s Cutlass Supreme coupe when he got an insurance settlement…bought his wife a maroon Jaguar XJ6 too to replace her Caprice. Pretty little car but sounded rough and agricultural. They were social climbers who kept bugging my parents to join the local country club…my parents refused…same boring restaurant, same boring people, same boring golf course, no thanks!
I would guess the Volvo is a 264 as it has the chrome on the grill.
Very modern dashboard in that Volvo.