You know the rules now, and it’s time to trade in your 1950s love object for one from the 1960s. And you’re going to be driving it until the next one in the 1970s.
Isn’t it easy? It’s the sixties. I mean is there anything else? Well sure there is; like a ’65 Chrysler 300, or ’63 Grand Prix, or a ’61 Cadillac, or…
So many obvious choices; all of them objects of many such MM sessions spanning back all the way right to the dawn of the sixties, when I arrived in the US as a wide-eyed seven year-old.
Only one small problem:
I’m a lot older now. Meaning that my taste, priorities, technical expertise and appreciation for things out of the mainstream have grown. I don’t eat the same food or drink the same kind of drinks, or listen to the same music, or watch the same kind of tv or movies, or have the same kind of thoughts and ideas form even ten years ago. And yes, ten years ago I would have picked the Riviera. And it’s going to hurt a bit not to have it for this return to the 60s. But I can’t go backwards; I have been enlightened.
So this is what it has to be; there’s no turning back. It’s the best all-round big American car of the 60s, period.
GM cars of the 60s go down nice and easy, like soda pop.
The ’62 Plymouth (and Dodge) are the Laphroaig of cars. Here’s a description of it: one of the most divisive Scotch whiskies, loved by those who enjoy its medicinal, smoky flavour and looked on in amazement by those who don’t. Pretty much sums up these cars. Look on in amazement.
Now I’m not going to go overboard here, as I’ve already done that with me deep immersion in the ’62 Dodge and Plymouth. My time spent on that article gave me the deeper appreciation for these cars, although I’ve always had some, right from the day in 1962 when Dr. Miller, who lived two doors down, showed up with a red Dart 440 just like this, having traded in his big ’56 DeSoto. It was clearly a bit more distinctive and challenging than anything GM and Ford had in 1962, and its trimmer size was obvious, especially compared to the big hulking DeSoto.
But then I’d been noticing a trend already in just the two years I’d been in the states: there were more and more compacts and trimmer American cars on the streets, including these downsized ’62s. And why not? It’s not like Dr. and Mrs. Miller had kids around.
I was nine, and had no clue as to who Virgil Exner or Bill Mitchell were. But from the day we arrived in the US in 1960, I’d instantly picked up on the obvious fact that Chrysler marched to a different drummer stylistically. GM’s trimmer 1961 lines were on full display that fall, and I was utterly smitten. I became an acolyte of the church of St. Mark of Excellence, and Mitchell was the high priest, had I know of his existence.
And the ’63 Riviera was his gift to the faithful.
I’m afraid my faith has lapsed some over the decades. Although looking at these pictures is giving me some serious doubts about that. I want to believe…but…I know that the Riviera is sitting on an outdated X-Frame chassis and the ’63 still had an antiquated transmission, and the nailhead V8 wasn’t ever really a genuine performance engine, and…
So now I must pay for opening my eyes to the truth, and drive a car that was derided by many when it first came out, and was quickly forgotten by the rest. That is, except for the few that saw it for what it really was: a car that was in many ways ten years ahead of the competition, if not even fifteen.
It was a tight and trim full unibody (unlike the really big Chryslers that used a front sub frame), with a degree of rigidity that was unheard of at the time. Which of course is the key to letting a suspension do its thing properly. Which it did.
It’s long hood, short tail proportions were unprecedented at the time, and were quickly appropriated by the Mustang. As maybe aspects of the Dodge’s front end.
In terms of its class, its size and proportion took 15 years to be finally adopted. And become the default big American car.
In all aspects, the benefits of its lighter weight (starting at a mere 2930 lbs) and advanced engineering were indisputable. It steered easier, even without power assist, it handled better than anyhting in its class, and it went better too.
The 305hp 361 Golden Commando V8 and the superlative Torqueflite, which was the top performance option at the start of the year, yielded 0-60 times of 8 seconds or less. We’re talking about an utterly tame engine, no lumpy-idling semi-racer.
By mid-year, the engine palate was extended to the 383 and the legendary 413 “Max Wedge”, which shut all the competition down on the strips. With a Torqueflite. Who needs to shift anyway?
The Sport Fury was a nice place from which to watch the competition recede in your rear view mirror. No, not Riviera nice, but priorities change.
And although the Riviera was the only car to have a comparably-fine speedometer, it had idiot lights for the rest (expect gas).
I’m going to have to make this short, as there’s more to life than MM’ing over old cars, but this is it for me. I might have some regrets by the end of the 60s, but I will be secure in the knowledge that none of the others will actually be better cars. There’s more to life than a pretty face.
I’m still for the 1963 Pontiac Grand Prix, though I see your point about the 1962 Dodge and Plymouth being “cars of the future” in so many ways.
+1 on the ’63 Grand Prix. My father had a 1964 Catalina 2-door hardtop and, while I thought it was a handsome car I always preferred the front end of the ’63’s. Of course the Grand Prix with it’s turn signals made to look like fog lights was really cool.
2nd and 3rd choice would be the ’66 or ’67 Riviera and ’67 or ’68 Eldorado.
Foreign makes really weren’t on our RADAR in the 1960s. As wonderful as they were/are, the W109 and W111 Mercedes really didn’t match the big American iron for traveling Texas straight, essentially flat highways back then – especially when it came to the air conditioning system.
So many great 1960’s biggie cars to choose from. I had a 1968 Olds Toronado, as well as, a not so big 1968 Dodge Dart and a 1967 Pontiac LeMans.
My dream car is a 1965 Buick Riviera GS dark green, tan vinyl interior.
Honorable mention to 1963 Lincoln Continental sedan or convertible, 1964 Pontiac Grand Prix, 1965 Olds Starfire, 1966 Ford Galaxie XL 7 Litre, and just about any wagon, Pontiac Safari, 1965 Buick Sport Wagon, Vista Cruiser, Country Squire, and Colony Park.
Back around 1978 my 18 y/o older brother had some buddies with MoPars he had a 4dr 1968 Dodge Coronet, one of his friends had a bad ass black 1962 Plymouth Fury with Cragar Mags. That ‘62 Plymouth was unique and very memorable- I loved looking at that grill. I can’t remember what his other two friends drove – a Road Runner(?) and/or a Satellite(?), but I’ll always remember that Fury.
Riviera, definitely the Riviera, I got the super cool Corgi Toys giftset with a pale blue Riviera towing a speedboat, no 2 another Corgi Toys the Chrysler Imperial convertible, no 3 the Chevrolet Corvair, just for the car’s shape which set the standard for the sixties and seventies, a sort of American bauhaus style
’62 Pontiac Grand Prix. Make mine a SD 421, 4 speed, 8 lug wheels
Paul, I’ll go with you on a ’62 Plymouth or Dodge. Ive always liked the challenging lines, their individuality. ..and the awesome interior of that Sport Fury seals it. I’ll take the brown car with the dog dish wheel covers. The 60’s gave us some really beautiful cars, the 1st gen Camaro is a perennial favorite of mine, but the pugnacious character of these Mopars shines brighter.
The 1960s?
There is no other choice.
The 1963 Lincoln Continental sedan.
And it’s so easily modified!
Man, this is the toughest question to ask me. I like a lot of other car enthusiasts view the 60s as the peak of automotive design, so even putting it in a specific term like this is tough because there’s so many cars for me to choose from that it’s difficult to form an exact concrete answer.
Ultimately, what answer I choose is dependent on what car I’m thinking of at the moment and that can change in a millisecond. So for now, my answer is going to be the 1969 Lincoln Continental Mark III.
The beautiful First Gen Riv is certainly up there – so too the 66 Toronado. But I have to go with the one in my garage (or should I say long term storage) – a 67 Lincoln Continental….
It’s 2019, and I’m almost-daily driving an 1967 Imperial hardtop sedan… The only way I would love it more is if I had bought it fresh off the showroom floor! I know the c-bodies get a lot of love here, so I’ll just say that it’s all true: great brakes, non-mushy ride, magical 440 + TorqueFlite, solid chassis, high-quality interior… numb steering.
Yesterday, if you would have asked me this question, I would have spec’ed out some wild car from the waning days of Virgil Exner or some crazy Chevy 409 powered or Pontiac 421 powered Detroit missile. I have very vague memories of our 1964 Monterey as I was born shortly before the car was built. Most of my memories are of my dad’s Montegos, rather than the full sized cars other families had. I grew up around plenty of Impalas, Delta 88’s, Polaras, Galaxies and Fury or II. But I’ve always tried to do more with less.
As Paul noted, your preferences change with time; back in the day, I would have wanted the fastest, loudest hot rod you could find. Now, not so much. After a long day at the office, I appreciate a car that can take me home in silence. I also appreciate a car that is big enough to accommodate my needs, but small enough to not be a pain to maneuver in traffic.
To that end, I think that my car of the 1960’s would be a 1967-1969 AMC Ambassador with the DPL package.
Yup, easy: a well-specced ’62 Fury 4-door. Well, that or a ’64 New Yorker.
I had a grayish-blue ’66 Plymouth Belvedere, with a 318. It was a pretty nice car, very reliable, roomy, and quiet. The build quality was good, I don’t remember any squeaks or rattles.
Is this pretty much the same car as mentioned in Paul’s article?
Mechanically similar, with four years’ refinements, and the ’66s were sturdier and better built than the ’62s.
Daniel – I’m with you on the ‘64 Chrysler. I’ve grown to appreciate them over the last few decades. I also wouldn’t mind a ‘65 Galaxie…
THE best 60s car, as far as I am concerned (and I am a big fan of Ford and Plymouth), is the 65 Chevy Impala. 2 door hardtop or convertible, though I might consider a 4 door hardtop if it was that metallic purple….or any other color, and it had a vinyl roof.
My runner-up choice? A 69 Plymouth, preferably a hardtop, but I like the car enough to accept ANY body style or engine/transmission combination.
My knee jerk is ’67 Impala two-door hardtop. I’ve always wanted one. I’d take a ’68, even.
But that’s a childhood car lust thing projected forward several decades.
As I’ve aged I’ve come to appreciate the big Engel Chryslers and wouldn’t mind a ’65 Newport two-door.
1965 Chrysler 300 2 door hardtop. Love that styling
That white 61 Coupe DeVille will do very nicely for me!
🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗
’69 Chrysler Newport Custom. Luv the fuselage look.
Its true, bigger is better!!! 😎😚😎😚😚
Like Dr. and Mrs. Miller, I picked a ’56 DeSoto for the 1950s. For the 1960s….
A part of me goes with a knee-jerk “1963 Ford Galaxie 500 four door, 352 with a three-speed and overdrive”. But that’s not very original on my part. That and my ten-year older knees are talking to me in impolite ways.
I’m torn. Part of me wants a 1965 to 1968 Chrysler Newport sedan. Another part of me really has a hankering for a 1968 Mercury Park Lane four-door hardtop. Chrysler was at a pinnacle of sorts and Mercury was coming into its own.
At this point I’d have to see which dealer was more willing to negotiate and gave me a better deal on a nearly 12 year-old DeSoto.
For me it’s an easy choice-the Studebaker Avanti.
I love the Avanti, but is it really big? I left it out of contention for that reason.
I’m going with a ’66 Corvair Corsa. ( I have one now) 140hp, 4 speed and F41 suspension.
Or how about a Studebaker Daytona with a Granatelli built R3 and a 4 speed just to be different.
For a family? ’67 Olds Vista Cruiser. 3 seater. Really lots of good choices then.
Bob
Bob, did you read the headline? We’re talking BIG (full size) cars, this time around.
Okay ’67 Impala.
But the Vista Cruiser was longer than the big Chevys and Pontiacs.
Yes, but he has GREAT taste in cars
Even though Paul and I sparred on his choice of the ’55 Bel Air (in the 1950’s choice article); we are in complete and total agreement on the ’62 Plymouth Fury. For all the reasons Paul so eloquently mentioned above.
When the ’77 Chevy 2 door was first released; I kept squinting at it and seeing my Father’s ’62 Plymouth and wondering if I was the only one with this vision. Thanks to Paul’s mention; I now know that there is at least two of us who see this.
Make mine the Sport Fury 2 door hardtop model, 361 4-BBL “Golden Commando” engine, the “Industry Reference Standard” Torqueflite automatic transmission, factory air conditioning, 3.23 final drive ration, gold/light brown (or perhaps jet black enamel?) exterior with that gorgeous 2 tone light brown/dark brown bucket seats/console interior, bumper guards, AM/FM radio (if available?). I’m wavering back and forth on power steering and power brakes.
I’d like to apologize to those here who were miffed or offended by my comments on the 1950’s car choice article. Yes, my automotive opinions can be strong and strident, especially in print. In person I am told that I sound more reasonable and mellow. My Max Mea Cuulpa to ya’ll!
On my choice of the ’62 Plymouth, I make no apologies.
*ratio
*culpa
Fat fingers, tiny i-phone icons and not enough coffee make for a “target rich” typo environment. .
Aarrgghhhhh!
I understand Paul’s attraction to “Extra care in engineering,” but I want to take the opportunity to react to the unusual appearance of modern cars and choose the first car to ever truly take my breath away: the ’65 Chevrolet Impala Sport Coupe. I know, they built millions of them and it is an easy choice, but it is my choice to make. It would have the perimeter frame, so we don’t have to argue about the safety limitations of the old X-frame. It is Spring, so I will go with Crocus Yellow, over red, because if ever there was a car I would not mind being seen in, this is the car. 327 small block/300 horsepower, four speed floor shift, Power steering/brakes, air conditioning. Various and assorted wheel, tire, brake and suspension options to keep up a little better with modern traffic (will need to upgrade to disc brakes and radials over time). And the two-speed windshield wipers, must have them. There: a really pretty car, built to take us any distance.
This has to be the basis for the COOLEST car ad I ever saw! Ever!
“The heartbeat of America”-I thought the dad was going to stroke out, right there! But then, they would not have shown the video. Do cars hold as much significance for people any more? And, after seeing this one, I change my color choice to the black interior. But the same car, it is lovely.
I start to cry when I watch this video. I think the “Chevy runs deep” campaign was one of their best. And this ad was their best. The current one is so generic.
Bob
I remember seeing that video a few years ago when it first came out. I’m happy for the dad, and the fun his two sons had in locating it and then presenting it to him as a complete surprise. Unfortunately, none in my family were, or are “car guys”, and me finding one of my dad’s old cars from the 1960’s and presenting it to him would bring little or no reaction of any kind from him; especially his second wife!
The 65 Impala loses the X frame, but gains the fail-to-wide-open-throttle engine mounts.
Ah, yes: so much torque, you’ll need a log chain to tie it down!
My favorite car of the ‘60s: An Imperial Crown Coupe!
Wow, a hard, hard, hard question.
I do love my Studebakers, but an Avanti would make me choose between the supercharger and a/c. And a 65 or 67 Chrysler 300 would be mighty tempting. As would be a 64 Continental. Or a 63 Galaxie 500 XL convertible.
But like PN I am older and after 4 years in my 59 300 E my need for high octane masculinity will have been sated. This will surprise a lot of people here but I want a car I have already owned – a 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special. Black with gray leather and brocade. Air, cruise and power everything. A strong but supple Cadillac V8, the great old 4 speed Hydra Matic in its final victory lap and simply the all-around finest large car in the world. Yes, the world.
Make mine a ‘63 Sedan de Ville. The one currently in my driveway.
Since a Corvair, Mustang or Valiant don’t count as “big cars” by the standard of the time, I’m going ’63 Pontiac. Just a basic Catalina two-door post with manual/OD – I don’t like the faux-convertible roofline and going by “present needs and means” a GP is too spendy, and I want no part of the Roto Hydra-Matic. I’ll splash out for chrome window trim, wheel covers and all-Morrokide upholstery though.
Any Chrysler 300 letter series
Ill order a ’66 4 door Caprice with a 283 and PG, power brakes, steering, air conditioning, windows, locks, seat (don’t know if that one was available). Soft Ray tinted glass all around, both sides rear view mirrors. Cloth interior (could you get that?), tilt steering column. If possible, strato buckets (ID think they were very special order on a sedan). It would be teal with blue vinyl top and teal interior. If I had any money left, there would also be an FM radio with an 8 track. By that time I’d probably rather have a Buick but I like to keep a low profile
Here I’m trying my best to pretend it’s the 1960s and need a new car to see me through to the next decade, but the reality that it’s really 2019 keeps intruding, and try as I do I can’t stop myself from perceiving the past through the lens that is the present. If it were really 50+ years ago, I’d start by breaking down my choices by manufacturer – Detroit’s big 3 and the one remaining independent (two if you count Studebaker, but they didn’t make it through the decade and the Hawk was the only thing close to a big car they made in the ’60s, though the GT Hawk would be a tasty choice). But since I can’t help but have a 2019 frame of reference, it’s obvious that there were actually three other American independents in the ’60s – AMC, Kaiser, and IH. It’s just the latter two either never made or no longer made sedans, just trucks and SUVs. You know, kinda like Ford…..
And that’s why I’m drawn to what was obviously the most futuristic car made in America in the ’60s – well it’s obvious *now*, though I doubt anyone in 1966 ever would have thought of it as either “futuristic” or a “car”. Behold the ’66-’69 Jeep Super Wagoneer, the world’s first luxury SUV, and the only ’60s vehicle that resembles the family car of today, a posh, comfortable, tall wagon with four driven wheels and extra ground clearance. There were plenty of other 4x4s in the ’60s of course, but those were rustic and not very comfortable. Here we have a comfortable family car with plush seats, loads of carpeting and soundproofing, a TH400 automatic, woodgrain trim inside and (sometimes) out, standard air conditioning, power steering with a tilt wheel, a vinyl roof, and lots of other things only luxury cars usually had in the day. And it was priced the part, above most Cadillacs.
Over the forthcoming decades the Super Wagoneer would morph into the Grand Wagoneer, though there wasn’t a whole lot of morphing (the ’63 and ’91 grilles interchange), and it illustrates how the future rarely plays out as expected. In 1966 many would have pegged the new Toronado as the most futuristic, but who today wants a huge personal-luxury coupe with a six foot long hood? Of course the Toro’s raison d’etre was its front wheel drive, and that did become the conventional layout for Camcords and other mainstream cars. The irony is that a big, powerful, luxurious, statement-making car like the Toronado is exactly what wouldn’t have FWD in 2019.
Now that i’ve penned my paean to the Wagoneer, I realize there may be something else that tugs at my heart even more, and i’m here to pick a heartmelter and not which car best portended the future. And so, I need to mull it over a bit before choosing what big car to take with me through this amazing decade. As much as I admire the thing, I’m not sure the Wagoneer is it. Be back later today.
This is a fine choice, even if you are playing a bit fast and loose with the rules. Hopefully the late rich uncle’s executor is understanding!
Much as I like the Wagoneer, I might just have to save it for the 70s or 80s.
Fast and loose? It’s American, it’s big. Not as big as a Suburban or Travelall, but still universally considered full size. Is it a car? It may not have been considered to be in the ’60s, but history has corrected that oversight, the SW now rightly regarded as the progenitor of the luxury SUVS (the Range Rover didn’t arrive until 1970) that are today the preferred family ride. Much more often than big sedans, and especially, big coupes or wagons.
As a modest and quiet guy who likes to keep a low profile and not draw attention to himself, the choice for a 60s daily driver is easy:
This is a much harder decade – much more to have to choose from. My instant first response would be the car that spanned over a decade of my life, our ’68 Country Squire LTD. I still keep my eye out for them, in fact.
And if we’re including full-size pickups, I’d have to go back to the ’69 F-100 that was part of our family for 42 years.
The ’63 Lincoln mentioned above would also be a no-brainer.
We weren’t a Mopar family growing up, but I wouldn’t say no to Paul’s choice, either…
Too many to list. The 60s were the golden age of American car design.
But my first choice is a ’68 Fury III hardtop sedan
Second would be just about any big ’65-69 Ford or Mercury
Y’all are really messin’ with my head! I came into this exercise thinking it would be an easy choice: 1965 Chevrolet Impala SS coupe or a 1965 Ford Galaxie 500 4-door hardtop, two cars I have always admired and can remember well from my youth. But then, I remember Jim Cavanaugh’s paean to the 1961 Chevrolet Impala, pictured in a gorgeous period-correct turquoise. Then there’s Eric703’s in-depth analysis of the many reasons to indulge a little and go for a 1968 Chrysler Newport Custom sedan, which would stand the rigors of 50 years, let alone a decade. Jason Shafer’s ode to his 1963 Ford Galaxie brought new respect for a car I had spent little time thinking of in the past. On a visceral level, I completely understand the appeal of the original 1963 Pontiac Grand Prix and the 1963 Buick Riviera as described by Paul Niedermeyer. But right now, I’m lusting after that silver 1962 Plymouth Sport Fury coupe shown above, rationalizing my “purchase” for all the reasons Paul describes. Ask me again in 15 minutes, and my answer will change!
Well let me tell you, my 1955 Dodge rusted out like crazy, so I was a bit disappointed. I went to change the license plates on it in 1962 (we got a new one every year alternating from white on blue to blue on white) and it was all rust back there and underneath. The rocker panels were missing in action. At the time (1962), I didn’t like the new Dodges or Chryslers (I would learn to appreciate them later in life on CC) so i wanted to wait for Uncle Bill’s next gift. I picked up a used car to tide me over, maybe a 58 plymouth and held out for my next ride.
By 1966, I had become a store manager, and I was hoping to advance up the district office chain, so I had to get a car befitting my status. Uncle Bill’s gift came in 1966 and i narrowed my choice down to either a Chrysler New Yorker or one of those glitzy looking beautiful Dodge Chargers. I always had yearned for a Chrysler, but the Dodge brochures sure were nice and I saw one at the Car show at the CNE Auto Building. I went out to Halnan Motors on Lakeshore in Port Credit, and took a Charger for a test drive. That 426 Hemi! That cavernous rear storage and that beautiful console did me in. That fastback styling convinced me to sign on the dotted line.
Lee, I knew a guy who went through this very real quandary in real time. He bought a new 66 Newport sedan very early in the model year. He loved it. He even had an in with someone at the Sun Oil Company who took one new car of every model and put it through a comprehensive bit of wrenching in order to create/modify service procedures and information that went out to all of the service stations. He said that when he got it back it was the most perfect 66 Newport ever.
And then the Charger came out later in the model year – early spring, perhaps. He traded his months-old Newport on a new silver Charger with a 383 and Torqueflite.
Very cool Jim, thanks for sharing!
Knowing what I know now, having owned lots of cars (including many Buicks) and driven many more:
1967 Buick Electra 225 – either two or four door hardtop. ’68 would be OK but ’67 has no ancillary side marker lights. It should probably be black too. Elegant, competent, comfortable, relatively discreet. I’d like fuel to be as cheap as it was in ’67 too.
67 Lesabre coupe loaded with the 430, no vinyl roof. Strato buckets, Super Turbine with a console in Midnight Iridescent blue. Gaylon Buick in Union NJ wants my 58 Impala but offered me pennies. I’ve decided to keep it for no good reason other than the memories. Great times at the Carousel and Five Points.
1965 300 L convertible, if I can switch it to dual-circuit disc brakes.
1968 Chrysler 300 convertible if I have to live with factory installed brakes.
I’ve thought about this question for over 30 years and always had the same answer. For the U.S. auto industry’s peak decade with dozens of great choices, I’ve always stuck with one: 1965 Pontiac Catalina 2+2.
Pontiac was really hitting their stride with a great line up of cars, well differentiated from the other GM divisions. John Z, Pete Estes et.al. providing leadership and vision. I really like the 65 styling and ever since I happened upon an old Motor Trend issue at age 14. They had tests of all the Pontiac models, including the 2+2. I thought that’s the coolest car and my opinion hasnt really changed since.
It would be tempting to get the tri-power, and 4 speed and convertible. But for daily driving and planning to keep it for at least 5 years, I would probably get the hardtop with 4 barrel and auto. The coupe roofline looks fantastic anyway
The 1960’s is tough, so many good choices. While I prefer the intermediate cars from this era, there are so many choices in the big car category too. I genrally preferred the low priced cars form this era, the medium and high priced cars mostly jumped the shark for me. My immediate answer would have probably been a 1965-68 Chevrolet Impala SS or a 65-67 Ford 500XL/7.0 Litre. But neither one were known for their driving dynamics. Chevrolet got things well sorted out for 1969. An Impala with F41 suspension, a high compression 350 and a TH350 was a pretty competent full size car. However, I don’t like the styling as much as the earlier years.
So after some deep thought, I have come to my choice. Generally luxury cars have had little appeal to me, but in this case, I think I have to make an exception. My choice is the 1965 Buick Riviera GS. Paul’s photos of the ’63 are enchanting and sucked me in like a siren song. Absolutely one of the most beautiful designs to come out of Detroit, especially with the hidden headlights of 1965. However, it also appeals to my right brain. The nailhead wasn’t the best performance engine, but the 1965 with dual quads was a formidable beast that knocked down mid 15 sec quarter miles with a top end of about 130 mph. By 1965 the car also used the excellent ST-400, which C/D called “the best transmission in the world” in it’s review of the 1965 Riviera.
The cruciform chassis has it’s faults, but in this case it was finely tuned with some of the best handling of the era, in particular at high speed. I have always tended to prefer highway machines over stop light racers, and I can’t think of a better car from this era for eating lots of highway miles in comfort with extreme road confidence. Despite the four wheel drums, the braking was actually pretty decent for the era as well. Other than the fuel economy, I can’t think of too many negatives.
To sum up. C/D said “We had a feeling that we were going to like this newest edition of the Riviera and we were right. It goes well, rides smoothly, corners better than most and – thanks to Buick’s long-term concern with brakes – stops with great authority…As it is, the Buick Riviera either in standard trim or Gran Sport version is one of the country’s best offerings to the automotive world. It isn’t tiny, and won’t get you to a hundred in ten seconds, and it’ll never be what you might call one of the low-priced three, but then neither is Sophia Loren.”
Here it is in all it’s glory:
Great choice! I’ll take mine in black.
Damn, Gaylin Buick called and said it would be at 3 months on an order for my LeSabre. He has a 65 Riv though that was traded in by a local doctor. I’m checking it now
A ‘68 Impala would be my choice. It was our family car after my Dad traded in his ‘66 Impala in on it. I always liked its looks, but I would spec mine differently than my Dad’s Grecian Green 307 powered Impala Custom. His ‘66 was a 283 powered fastback in Firethorn Red. I liked its profile better than the later Custom’s more formal roofline.
For my ‘68 Chevy, I’d either go for a dark blue in SS trim with the 327, or a convertible Impala in light blue with a white top and white interior.
As to Paul’s choice? I’ve never been a huge Mopar fan, but I always liked that ‘62 Dodge, and felt it was given a bad rap. It, and its Plymouth stablemate were really cool looking cars, IMO.
Regarding Laphroaig? – While a nice scotch, make mine an 18 year old OBAN please.
🥃 – Cheers! – 😀
Of course, the 1961 Lincoln Continental is number one, and there are several others that have fantastic design – but a rather obscure one as far as being every listed is the 1967 Thunderbird. I love the jet front end and overall cohesive and clean design.
Tough one. This decades car’s are where I entered the car world and so many choices are based on family experience and fond memories.
Taking sentiment out of the equation, a reliable, enjoyable and comfortable vehicle I could see me living with would be a 1969 Chrysler Newport.
I am a fan of the styling, have actually driven one so I know how they handle the road and feel it would be a sensible choice for a good few years service.
Of course, the 1961 Lincoln Continental is number one, and there are several others that have fantastic design – but a rather obscure one as far as being every listed is the 1967 Thunderbird. I love the jet front end and overall cohesive and clean design.
1965 Buick Riviera GS. And you’ll have trouble getting it away from me when the 70s roll around.
So many cars to choose from. My pick would be a ’63 Chevy Impala SS… black on black with a 409 and a 4 speed.
The early ‘60s Mopars make for a rational left-brain choice, but the styling was just too weird. That, plus the interior trim on the Plymouths & Dodges I remember seemed a little cheesy compared to concurrent Chevys & Fords.
On the other hand, in the early ‘80s, my dad had a ‘64 non-letter Chrysler 300 2-door that was pretty cool, except for the band-aid beige paint. Leather bucket seats with console. Superb runner, with it’s 383 2-bbl and push button Torqueflite. So, for my ‘60s big ride, show me a ‘63 or ‘64 Chrysler 300 in dark blue metallic or possibly black, cut me a deal on the AireTemp A/C and you might be able to talk me into it.
Still, I’m A Chevy guy at heart, so I’d be tempted to trade the 300 in for a ‘65 – ‘66 Impala or Caprice after the 396 and the new Turbo Hydramatic becomes available.
What do you find “cheesy” about this ’62 Plymouth Sport Fury interior?
Just aksin’
Mark, I think the problem is that most of us who ever got close enough to a 62 Plymouth to look inside saw something that looked more like this. At least until the thin chrome plating wore off the rings around the instruments leaving them surrounded by off-white plastic. 🙂
Ahhhh, perhaps so!
Spending 4 of my formulate grade school years bouncing around in the back seat of my parent’s well optioned Plymouth has prejudiced my thought process. I keep forgetting that the rest of the world did not share my childhood/early adulthood (maybe a good thing?).
The competition also had their own plain-jane, taxi cab interior models that looked about like your picture.
Gotta admit, the Sport Fury’s pretty cool! Unfortunately, I only got to experience the entry level ones back then.
1964 300K four speed. Second choice, a 1964 Dodge 880 Custom hardtop coupe. 361 , four speed, white with red interior.
There was a good reason the 1965 Chevy Impala remains the best selling one year marque of all time. It wrapped all the reliable goodness of that era Chevy into one of the most beautiful bodies ever seen. And those curvy hips still hit me in my happy place.
I`m liking ALL of them, but that white`61 Cadillac coupe does it for me. I`ll take one just like that, as long as it has air conditioning.
While I like the big Chryslers of the 1960s, especially the 64 New Yorker, and the Big Dodge 880, I would have to go for the 1965 Mercury. So that is what I would’ve gotten.
So many choices! I tend to prefer styling from the late sixties to the finny to boxy early-mid stuff, so I feel I’ll be holding onto my 50s choice all the way to 1968. Full size cars started getting a whiff of stale maturity by this point, but the one I always felt held onto its youthful vigor and arguably redeemed itself in style from the previous years entry, the 68 Pontiacs. This front end on this size car looks better to me than the Tempest and GTOs also wearing the basic look, but with the cool and oh so distinctive boomerang taillights that the new intermediates badly fudged with my pet peeve taillights-in-the-bumper look I never found flattering. Make it a red 428/4-speed convertible. I’m not normally a vert guy, but for whatever reason the longer the lower the wider these epitimized, the more it appeals to me, it’s like a cigarette boat.
Also, like my 50s choice I’m probably keeping it through the bulk of 70s. I think it will age well.
1968 Cadillac Fleetwood
honorable mention
1967-68 Oldsmobile Ninety Eight
1969 Mercury Marquis Brougham
1967-68 Chrysler New Yorker
1964 Chrysler Imperial
This was very hard to choose from because the 1960’s is my all time favorite decade of automobiles and everything went right in that decade because of the high compression V8 engine’s, creative styling, the height of the muscle car, better interior qualities and good performance.
Another car I forgot to mention is the 1967 Ford Galaxie 2 door with the 390 or 428
I’d pick a 1967 ford 3/4 ton 4×4 with 8 foot box. a nice self contained camper to slide in the back to travel would be perfect.
For me it has to be a 1966 Cadillac 60 Special Fleetwood Brougham or a 1966 Eldorado. Runner up 1967 Eldorado. In black of course no other “color” will do.
We were a Pontiac family in the 1960s, and in 1974 as a teenager I got a ’66 Bonneville convertible ($850) that I kept through ’91. I wouldn’t want a pre-1967 car today, simply because of the lack of a collapsible steering column, and I don’t like the 1968 and later styling much (nor the interiors), so that leaves the 1967 full-size Pontiacs – which finally had front disc brakes available, among other new options such as cornering lights, 8-track stereo, and shoulder harnesses. Give me a fully optioned coupe, convertible, or wagon, and I’d be happy as long as I could put radial tires on it. (You could get any option on any full-size Pontiac, although I finally learned that the longer wheelbase of the Bonneville and Executive non-wagons didn’t translate into any extra interior leg room, just a longer trunk – so I’d probably choose a Catalina or Ventura two-door.)
Very tough choice, but today I’d go with the ’66 Chevelle/Malibu. Clean styling but I’d have all the performance, handling, and comfort options.
I’m with you, but I would go the mid-’60s Chevelle 2 door wagon. Sort of a newer Nomad with a bit less bling. The nice ’55 Chevy package wrapped in something newer, and really sharp lines that you must actually look at to appreciate, as they don’t hit you from 100 feet away.
Again, so hard to choose…
Lincoln Continental drop-tops are *very* tempting, but I’ll go left field in the Engel back catalogue and pick the 1966 Imperial. Last year for the old BOF and 1957-style windshield, but a brand new 440 under that big hood.
1965 Buick Riviera, hands down. And up again.
I just can’t think of anything post-war Detroit that looks better.
’65 Sport Fury…2 door hardtop or convertible but I want the 383 Super Commando. In the HT, Ill hook that to the A-833 4spd but in a droptop I think the TorqueFlite is more in line with its character. Either way, I want a solid eyecatching color (bright red, dark blue etc) with buckets/console and no rear fender skirts. Of course its gotta be rolling on proper coke bottle mags.
I agree on the ’62…the plucked chicken cars are definitely an acquired taste and as a card carrying Scotch man (and a HUGE fan of Laphoraig) I couldn’t agree more that its not for everyone. The comparison to a rowdy Islay whisky is spot on.
Yes! I’ve liked the ’62 Plymouth’s styling since it first came out. Trim and space age, I love it. Perfect dashboard and full gauges. Plus all the superior engineering you cite. Make mine a red Fury convertible please!
Wow, if only all of you guys had been around in 1962 – it might have been Ford that needed Federal loan guarantees in 1980. 🙂
The same color as the one “Jane Hathaway” drove in the first season of “The Beverly Hillbillies” tv show.
Indeed, good spotting! But how’d you know the color, it was black & white TV?
I just assumed that it was red. Every car she drove was red.
I am so with you Paul on the 62 Plymouth, they have been a favourite of mine for years. A wagon with dog dish hubcaps…
But, I already picked a Plymouth for my 50’s car so I had already decided to pick a GM car for the 1960’s. Yes, yes, I know I’m not much of a GM guy, but the 60’s were peak GM.
So make mine a 1964 Pontiac Bonneville wagon with 8 lug wheels and a 389. A great vehicle to pack up and make a trip to Bonneville Salt Flats during the 1960s. Bring the Plymouth and we’ll meet there.
On the Scotch front, we recently had “Scotch night for gentlemen” at our house and although I previously had not appreciated Islay Scotch, I found that one dram inserted between a Balvenie Doublewood and a Cardhu to be a pleasant contrast. 🙂
Ummmm – aren’t you taking the wrong 1964 car to Bonneville? 🙂
Very cool, but I didn’t think the Stude qualified as a big car. Besides, my favourites are the 65’s which aren’t even American.
You are welcome to join us at Bonneville to drink Scotch and watch Studebakers go very very fast.. 🙂
If the ’62 Dodge and Plymouth qualify as big cars, so does the GT Hawk. Make mine a red supercharged ’64 with R2 and 4 speed. Not an R3 because you can’t get it with air conditioning.
Hmmm,
Being a conservative person, I would like something that didnt diverge too much from the previous decade, and it should be fast.
Living in Sweden, I can see myself with family of four persons totally, crusing at high speed on Autobahn through Germany to the French Riviera.
I would go for the 1962 Chrysler 300H!
1962 specifications list five additional 426 cubic inch wedge head engines available through Chrysler dealers for racing only, I would make a cross in the box and order the 421 HP 498 ft lb. torque 426 Wedge engine and ask for a French-built Pont-a-Mousson four-speed gearbox.
Dreams!!!
Having been born in 1951 the cars of the sixties are right in my sweet spot; I could easily list a half dozen or more that I would take in a heartbeat. If limited to only one I would take a 1965-66 Pontiac two door hardtop, I would be fine with the Catalina but the 2+2 would definitely be the way to go. For me the 65-66 GM B bodies are the best looking full size vehicles that the General made; I find the Pontiacs to be the best looking, followed by Buick, Chevrolet and then Oldsmobile, a distant fourth in this competition. These cars are far from perfect but they are absolutely a product of their times; back when the U.S. was still moving from strength to strength and before the collective doubts of the seventies began moving to the front. These cars celebrate the era of cheap gas, wide open spaces and a pervasive optimism that all was right with the world. Of course all was not right with the world, then or ever, but for many of us the cars of this era bring back (mostly) good memories.
Might as well chime in – Chevy Impala SS Sports Coupe or SS convertible, of course!
I already had the SS ragtop, so I’ll have to choose the hardtop.
1966 Oldsmobile Toronado!
Difficult choice, so much an embarrassment of riches, but just one….hmmm.
’66 Oldsmobile Toronado Deluxe, solid dark blue, loaded including A/C, just swap the drum brakes for later disk, I’d be good to go. Had a ’67 Toronado Standard, no power goodies, cheaper interior forty years ago, still loved it, one of the few cars I’ve owned one before and would still love another one.
Many alternative number ones, in no particular order:
’61-’63 Lincoln Continental
’60 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham
’63-’67 Buick Riviera
’67-’70 Cadillac Eldorado
’65-’66 Cadillac 60 Special Fleetwood Brougham, especially the latter year.
’62-’63 Imperial LeBaron
’60-’68 imperial convertible
’63-’66 Oldsmobile 98
’63-’66 Buick Electra
’63-’64 Chrysler New Yorker Salon
’63-’66 Pontiac Bonneville & Grand Prix
’67-’69 AMC Ambassador DPL & SST convertible or hardtop
’65-’66 Ambassador convertible
And to be ecumenical, a few “ahdidities” (oddities) for variety:
’60 Rambler Ambassador hardtop sedan or wagon
’60 Edsel four door hardtop
’61 Rambler Ambassador
’61 DeSoto
’62 Dodge Custom 880 convertible
’61 Studebaker Lark Cruiser
IH three-door Travel-all
Checker Marathon Town Custom limousine
Paul and I apparently have similar taste in cars. I’d decided on a Dodge Dart as my 1960s car even before he published this article. Really I’d like a ’63 — I’m really not a Big Car Man, but if it has to be full sized I’ll take a ’62. I’ll take mine with a Slant Six though. I’m more concerned with dependability than performance and I have the benefit of hindsight in knowing how bulletproof that engine was.
Too many choices for the 60’s. But in terms of our family history, I would want to drive our 1965 Thunderbird coupe or my aunt’s 1966 LTD coupe – they were both quality products of a great decade of style, comfort, and performance from Ford.
I agree with age changing tastes. Its a target rich environment for muscle cars, but that’s not what was asked. A mid size car falls into the same category and one I’d rather choose, but we’re going big. I need a truck more than a car, etc.
It’s the ’60’s… go big or go home. OK. I’ll take a ’69 Galaxie 500 XL Fastback. 429. Buckets and console. Black with a red interior and striping.
This is a tough question. I don’t really like enormous automobiles. I have always had more fun in a small car, with perhaps the exception of a 9C1, of course.
If I had to take one, it would either be a 1969 Chrysler Newport with a 383 4 bbl or a 1969 Impala Sport Coupe with a 350 and Turbohydramatic.
The Chrysler was a clean sheet car that year, so that makes it a non-starter for me. A nicely optioned Impala, with F-41, disk brakes (a must for me) bucket seats, console shifter and tilt wheel will be enough for 1969 me. Powering it would be a 350 4 bbl, because a Big Block would be wasted on me and cost a fortune at the gas pumps.
A triple white 1969 Cadillac convertible.
Since we’re talking ‘big’ which, to me, means ‘full-size’, I agree with the author that the smaller, downsized ’62-’64 Mopars would be the choice (in ’65, they actually got knocked down to intermediate-class when Chrysler brought back ‘true’ full-size cars). And the best-looking of those cars is the 1964 Fury hardtop.
In that regard, for longevity, it would have to be a slant-six/Torqueflite combo. Slow? Yeah, but it would also be the lowest maintenance and most dependable (so long as you lived somewhere winter road salt wouldn’t eat the body away).
Dodge at least was already marketing the ’62 Dart as a midsized after the big 880 was introduced in mid-year 1962. The downsized ’62 Dodges only got to be sold as “full size” cars for a few months. Not sure about Plymouth, since their dealers also already sold big Chryslers and didn’t need bigger Plymouths.
Good call on the 1962 Dodge Custom 880 effectively knocking the Dart and Polara down to intermediate status.
Likewise, it could be said that the base Chrysler Newport did the same thing to the downsized Plymouth Fury. In effect, if you wanted a ‘big’ Plymouth, you had to either find a Dodge dealer for the Newport-based Custom 880 or just cough up the cash for a genuine Newport.
“if you wanted a ‘big’ Plymouth, you had to either find a Dodge dealer for the Newport-based Custom 880 or just cough up the cash for a genuine Newport.”
You didn’t even need to come up with extra money because the 880 and the Newport both listed for the same base price, at least in 1962.
Any DeSoto owner ready to trade in 1962 found he could trade-up to the prestige of a new Chrysler Newport for $2,964 at his now Chrysler-Plymouth dealer for less than he given for his new DeSoto a few seasons prior. Small wonder DeSoto was so quickly forgotten.
Really, really tough choice! An uncle and his wife came to visit us, and they were driving a sparkling ’62 Cadillac Sedan de Ville. I got to ride in it a bit, and it was like nothing I had been in up to that point. So that’s a possibility.
My oldest brother had a ’65 Impala Super Sport that originally had a 396 and 4-speed stick. He sacrificed the 396 to keep a race car going when he was stationed in England, and put a 283 in its place. Still, it was fun to drive it.
My favorite, visually, is the ’65 Chevy. I can’t go with the ’67 or ’68 because the semi-fastback looks a bit bloated, and I really don’t like the rooflines of the Impala Custom/Caprice two-doors, any year. I’m going with a generously optioned ’65 Impala SS, with the base 327, Powerglide, power steering, power brakes, A/C, power windows, stereo radio, clock, electric wipers, whitewalls, heavy-duty cooling system (for Arizona), suspension improvements.
I’ll pick 1962, either a Chevy or Pontiac bubbletop coupe. But if I have to choose just one, I’ll say the Pontiac. I have a strong visual memory of seeing pictures in Hot Rod magazine of one of these, perhaps a Mickey Thompson car, that has stuck with me for 55+ years. A few updates … disc brakes, faster ratio steering … and I’m sure it could be a fine daily driver.
So many cars to choose from in the sixties, but my dream car is a dark green 1965 Riviera GS with tan vinyl interior.
Honorable big car mention would be a 1963 Lincoln Continental convertible or sedan, 1964 Pontiac Gran Prix, 1966 Ford Galaxie XL 7 Litre, and just about any station wagon Pontiac Safari, Vista Cruiser, Sport Wagon, Country Squire or Colony Park.
Back around 1977 my brother had a 4dr 1968 Dodge Coronet, he had a friend with a bad ass black 1962 Plymouth Fury with a set of Cragar Mags. That 1962 Plymouth was unusual and very memorable- I loved looking at the grill on that car, a couple of his other friends had MoPars, but I can’t remember what they drove.
Checker Marathon wagon.
think I will take a 64 Plymouth Sport Fury with auto and a 318 by 64, chryco
had turned the funny looking 62’s into mighty pretty cars
Too hard. Can’t.
I’d have to go with peak-Pontiac, at least for the full-size variants: a 66 2+2 with the 421 Tri-Power V8 and 4-speed manual. Make it that light yellow color that was popular back then.
By the Sixties? Big car?
Nothing.
Yeah, dad’s 65 Impala SS hardtop was neat. But the only thing that can get me away from a Corvair (Monza, Spyder or Corsa) would be the 62 Plymouth.
Any other big car was too damned big.
Well you’ve about convinced me, Paul, to go with a Mopar. I generally quite like the wacky designs of this era of Mopars and you’re spot-on about the dimensions of these. A ’62-64 Dart/Polara/Fury would be just lovely.
…but I’m still going to have to go with my initial answer: a ’67 Oldsmobile Toronado. These are one of the most beautiful cars ever made and the ’67 had improved brakes before they botched the styling for ’68.
Runners-up would include the Lincoln Continental, the Engel-era Chrysler New Yorker, and the ’67-69 Buick Wildcat. Most full-size cars of this decade were just too big for my tastes but that threesome has just enough style or sculpting to interest me. And I’d take a four-door sedan version, thank you — as an Australian used to much smaller cars, I never understood why you’d want a car as big as an aircraft carrier, with a giant trunk but only two doors (other than for the obvious reason: it looks dope).
Easy one for me, ’61 or ’62 Chrysler letter series. 2nd would be a black ’60 Imperial.
!963 Grand Prix 421 Super Duty 4 speed in black.
Do I have my 4 kids on this time excursion? Then I’d pick a 64 Buick Sport Wagon! Everyone knows about Vista Cruisers, but I’d like one of these. With the biggest engine I could get, and HD everything so I could pull a travel trailer.
I am still a speed freak at heart. Since a GTO is not a full-size car, I’ll take an 1967 Impala SS in my favorite color:
Big car? Flat-floor 1966 Oldsmobile Toronado
I’m going for the 1967 Imperial LeBaron. More unique than it’s given credit for. Still well built, and intriguing, if straight-line styling.
I like the hardtop sedan, but I’d go for the 2 door hardtop Mobile Director, the office you can drive (or at least your chauffeur can if not you). I’m sure I’d find alternate uses for this besides corporate overtime 🙂
I wonder if anyone ever actually loaded a couple of businessmen into the back then swiveled around and held an actual meeting over the table. More likely the owner’s two kids used it to play Go Fish.
It had to be a bitch for the chaufer to see around the passenger in the rear facing front seat.
I would think that facing backwards for a long time in a car traveling at 70 mph would lead to car sickness.
Was there a little matching Mopar sick bag for that purpose?
As with the Dodge La Femme, it is difficult to fully understand the ROI thinking at Chrysler Corporation regarding such narrow market options. Fun for us today, though.
And they brought Mobil Director back in 2008 with the Swivel ‘n Go minivan option! Unfortunately, it was just as unpopular, and was discontinued after 2010.
It’s not particularly difficult to understand why, either. While swiveling the second row captain’s chair around sounds like a good idea, there wasn’t a lot of room for legs for either the second or third row. You just know that created havoc for kids kicking each other. Then, things really got tight when the table was installed, even for small children. Besides, because of the seat recline angle, you couldn’t access the table without leaning forward, anyway.
On top of all that, Stow ‘n Go was still immensely popular and anyone opting for Swivel ‘n Go had to forego the fold-into-the-floor second row seats.
I doubt it would have made much difference, but maybe Swivel ‘n Go would have sold better if Stow ‘n Go hadn’t been around.
My heart says 1968 Chrysler 300, but its impossible to be rational about this, there are just so many cool cars from all the manufacturers, 1965 Impala 2 door hardtop, the one Thunderbird I like is the 1967 2 door, the list is too long and thats not answering the question.
At least when the 1970s come around I know there is only one.
This can only be answered from the PoV of someone living in North America – a full-size in the American sense is too big to enjoy here in Europe, and it was no different back when the cars were new. In that case, I’ll have one of those (maybe not the racing version with the 427 side-oiler but even a 390 would provide the goods). In my view, the 64 Montclair was the zenith of 60s Mercury styling. And you could get a heavy duty suspension and quick-ratio steering to do away with the looseness.
…but there were full-size Europeans too…
Perhaps the best Highway Patrol car built for the next 3 decades. When I buy the car, I won’t know that I’ll want he car to last past through the era of 70’s smog dogs. Since this is imaginary, I’ll gift myself with foresight. I’d spec CHP spec mine as an unmarked adding AC, cloth seats, a Superlight and a better radio. Fuselage done right.
Having this now move into the 1960’s makes it VERY difficult for me… so many cars to chose from.
But for all the right reasons, then and now… 1966 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham
#2
+1, especially the 1966 because of those wonderful walnut window friezes!
I’d take a 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado with the improved standard braking system, and optional front disc brakes. But no vinyl roof, please!
The second choice would be a 1969 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale hardtop coupe with the front disc brakes and bucket-seat interior.
A 1967 Ford Galaxie 500 four door.
Because that is what my father had.
What else😁
Pontiac Catalina Convertible – Any year would be nice but 1963 is my favorite. In the 1960s I was mainly interested in dating girls. So, I would like a car that was nice, fun, somewhat sporty, and not outrageous. I wanted to appear somewhat prosperous but not showy (per Polonius “rich not gaudy”). Actually a LeMans would be my choice and I had two of them but full size cars are required for this exercise. An Impala convertible would suffice but they were everywhere and a Pontiac was viewed as slightly nicer.
My Dad always said that his 1964 Catalina convertible, midnight blue with a baby blue top, was his favorite car of his lifetime.
I’d have to go with a 1969 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special in Wisteria, White interior. For a Convertible make it the Deville. Same year. or a 68 Eldorado, to go With my 1965 Turquoise Tbird. I like a loaded 1965 Chrysler New Yorker to represent #3.
Any full-sized 1965 Pontiac, preferably the Grand Prix. That car is my Holy Grail. Had a ’69 SJ when I was younger, but the big ’65s are the prettiest cars I have ever laid eyes on. The stacked headlight bezels are perfect, as are all the lines. The ’69s come close, but the ’65s are just so graceful looking.
1966 Imperial, 4 door.
A near second is the 1964 Cadillac Sixty Special.
Wow!!!! this is really tough, you have my guilty pleasures(dodge and plymouth) anything and everything from GM, Ford with the Mustang,early Falcons(and vans) and of course Lincoln and Mark 3. I’ll still take a 1967 Fleetwood Brougham and a simple 64 Chevy Corvair as daily driver.
How about a 1960 Dodge Matador or Polara? Probably the most over-the-top “Space Age” design of all time. Plus the advantages of Unibody, TorqueFlite, and torsion bars. See-through speedometer. A clear steering wheel with little stardust speckles in it. Everything else to match.
About 42,000 of these were built–so hard to find one for decades now. What happened to them all?
The wild “Space Age” styling was its downfall on the used car market, dated the cars very quickly. My N.A.D.A used car price guide for April-May 1963 list as follows:
1960 Dodge Polara 4dr Ht, FOB $3,275: Average Retail: $1,400.
1960 Pontiac Bonneville, 4dr Ht, FOB $3,331; Average Retail $1,875
By July 1965, the Polara retailed for $400, the Bonneville $650. Guess which one got bought to just run into the ground first.
I can totally see Paul’s rationale. I have a ’62 Dart 330 sedan – my second one! It’s hard to be on the fence with the styling for most people – it’s either love it or hate it.
BUUUUTTT – if I were doing a lot of traveling (which I do), my choice would be a ’65 Merc Park Lane Breezeway sedan – black with red brocade interior, 390-4V and loaded hard. I’m a little biased, as I own a loaded Park Lane Marauder 4 door HT.
Honorable mentions:
’67 AMC Marlin
67 Merc Monterey S-55 (I have one too)(1 of 145 ragtop would be better)
63-64 Caddy 60 Special (dark blue please)
60-61 Chrysler NYer hardtop wagon
67 Pontiac 2+2 (in turquoise)
61 Dodge full size or Dart hardtop (oh that beautiful roofline)
Ah, the Swinging 60s! I was too young to have experienced it firsthand, being a 47 years young Gen-Xer, but my baby-boomer Dad has told me oodles of fun and good times he had growing up in that decade.
So, the cars–for me,1964 represented a high-water mark year for automotive design. Seemed like all the manufacturers brought their A-game to the table that year. But, being a Ford man at heart, my choice will come from the Blue Oval Brigade. I would have to go with the 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 XL, two-door hardtop, 390 four barrel, automatic trans (for reliability and ease in traffic) and the buckets and console interior. Preferably in that lovely pearl-white hue that seemed so popular back then.
The attached example has aftermarket wheels, but this is pretty much what my mind’s eye conjures up when I picture one of these magnificent beasts.
’61 Impala or Catalina bubble-top. Big engine, 4-speed. Always liked those.