Churchgoing peaked in the US in the 1950s with roughly half of Americans attending church regularly in 1955 (by 2021 that number was down to 33%). However, to go by period car ads, the US was almost a completely secular society. Much like smoking, churchgoing was an activity that many participated in at the time, yet was almost never depicted by automakers in their ads.
As with my previous non-trope post on smoking, the handful of ads collected here represent the sum total of ads I could find depicting either a church or the activity of churchgoing: There were no ads that didn’t make the cut. Personally, I find these non-trope posts actually more interesting than my regular ad trope posts, as non-tropes show everyday activities that automakers almost completely ignore in their ads.
As always, I like to start with the earliest example I could find, which in this case is the 1918 Buick ad pictured above. As we shall see, these depictions are used to subtly (almost subliminally) burnish the moral bona fides of the manufacturer and by implication those of potential buyers, but without being so overt as to risk offending any particular group (Jews and agnostics buy cars too, after all).
Along those lines, here we see a 1951 Pontiac parked in front of a building that is clearly a church. The church is non-denominational – No signs and certainly no crosses anywhere to be seen – but it is definitely Christian, probably Protestant. Even the copy in the ad above tiptoes around the subject ever so gingerly, resorting to the codeword “Character” that can vaguely connote religiosity.
This 1959 Edsel ad is even more subtle. The building in the background has a somewhat generic Federalist architecture. Without stained glass windows, a bell tower, or even a sign, the building could plausibly not be a church at all. However, everyone (children included) is dressed up in their Sunday best, so it is pretty clear where they are all walking to and why.
This 1960 Chevrolet is parked in front of a building that is unmistakeably a church. There is even a sign on the left, although the exact denomination of the church in question is purposely obscured. Initially, I thought this ad might be depicting a First Communion, but upon closer examination, the Mom in front of the Impala appears to be attaching angel wings to one of the little girls, so the event being implied is likely something more secular like a school play, costume pageant, or possibly even trick-or-treating.
The church in the background is more of a prop than anything else. In any case, the ad copy is 100% secular Madison Avenue.
Lastly, this 1965 Chevy II ad tiptoes just a tiny bit closer to the religiosity line than any of the other ads I found. The building the people are exiting is clearly a church, complete with stained glass windows. The event they just participated in appears to be a baptism. While the baby that Grandpa is carrying is hard to make out, the fact that all the ladies are fawning over it makes it clear that it is indeed a baby. he is carrying. The ad even goes so far as to mention the word “Sunday.”
While this is as religious as it gets from Detroit, it is still pretty weak sauce. Outside the “Sunday” reference, the rest of the ad copy is pure secular Detroit.
Growing up we didn’t have very much, but my dad always bought a new Pontiac every 3 years or so. Since we were on a farm and didn’t go anywhere except the grocery store and church, my family thinks we had to have a new car to show the people at church we were doing ok. We were the target of those ads.
One more dressed in Sunday best. Picture from The Ford 1955 Farm Ranch Home Almanac.
This one just makes ya ‘cold”!!
From what I see on the Chrysler Fuselage website. Chrysler did one ad for the 1971½ Newport Royal where the Newport Royal stands in a front of a church.
http://fuselage.de/index.html?http://www.fuselage.de/chr71/
http://www.fuselage.de/chr71/71chr_royal_ad4b.jpg
Q: Why was the Edsel parked outside a church?
A: It didn’t have a prayer.
Beat me to it!
I have vague memory of a few Ford images in brochures (rather than ads), but don’t think I’ll go chasing them down today. I do remember this Studebaker ad (1963-64) from when someone at CC wrote up the “Cruiser”:
These are all high-status churches with colonial or classical architecture. I’m sure there were no ads with a Fire Baptism Holiness or Iglesia Pentecostal storefront church.
I guess adding weddings in to the equation is cheating.
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/plymouth-1957-advertising1950s-vintage-car-ad-1950s-wedding-illustration-1950s-car-vintagead-carad-illustration–204562008062358331/
The church behind the ’60 Impala sure could use a lick of paint.
Noticed how “dingy” it looked as well. No “photo retouching” I’d guess. H’mm.
The “Chevy II” ad is a bit a clever..
The Pontiac church looks off – designed by the illustrator but not an architect. The bell tower and steeple are askew – off to one side. Shouldn’t that feature be astride the ridge of the roof? Maybe I’m seeing it wrong, like an Escher print.
Anyway, nice colors on both the Pontiac and Edsel.
I am surprised that there are not more ads of people from weddings coming out from churches. But I can understand that in the world of advertising, churches were something to be avoided – People who went to church did lots of other things too (like shopping, going to beaches or picnics, and driving on scenic roads as often seen in ads) but people who didn’t go to church didn’t go to church, so why alienate them.
The old admonition to not discuss politics or religion is an old one. I guess we didn’t see many car ads depicting political scenes, either.
Lincoln is the only car brand that I can think of that was named after a politician (a pretty significant one, it has to be said).
There was briefly a Roosevelt, a Marmon companion brand, named after Teddy.
There used to be a whole bunch of model names named for political positions, like President, Statesman, Ambassador, Senator, and even Dictator. I notice even generic references to politicians aren’t popular anymore.
You’re right, JPC. Too many buttons of hot in religion.
If, say, Cadillac were to have a photo ad with “What would Jesus drive?”, it’d really have to have the car located on the tee-box on a golf course for the avoidance of alienation. (Answer: About 120 yards. Unless He mysteriously, His wonders to perform, moves the hole).
Though given the awful history of who could and couldn’t join golf clubs, maybe not even that!
On the other hand, I wonder as to how many church-goers let their conscienses decide not to let them purchase Dodges Swinger and Demon
Great pictures all of them .
-Nate
Off we went to Mass every Sunday in a crumbling 1962 VW Microbus, which is a car probably quite sensible to advertise in front of a Catholic church, given the propensity of all around us to have Far Too Many Kids.
Father Cross always used to end with “Go in peace, to love and serve the Lord”, but we really didn’t do anything like either. As soon as we were all back aboard The Rust Miracle – the Miracle being that front and back stayed conjoined in defiance of science – the fights would begin. Kids who haven’t eaten and who’ve then been intentionally made to sit in Respectful Bored-Ass Respectability for an hour-and-a-half aren’t much likely to love or serve anyone at all.
But I still reckon VW missed an ad opportunity, back in the day. Picture it. A church: a van : kids dressed up spilling out (in this version, all smiling and lovely): “VW Microbus – When You Just Can’t Stop.”