While General Motors “Old Look” bus was pounding the streets of almost all US major cities during the post-war era, a similar coach was leading the market in France – it was the Chausson AP series urban transit bus.
The Société des Usines Chausson, primarily a manufacturer of auto and truck parts before the war, developed a ten-meter/32 foot bus to meet the demand for increased transportation in post-war France. Like its counterpart SETRA in Germany, it experimented with a semi-monocoque design, to increase strength while reducing weight.
The result was the AP-1. Other than the semi-monocoque body, it was fairly typical of the era – the engine was mounted up front in a cradle and the suspension had leaf springs at both ends. Panhard provided the engine; a 6.8 litre gas four cylinder with 80 hp. It seated 40.
The Panhard gas engine was barely adequate, so the AP-2 was introduced in 1946 with a Hotchkiss 7.4 litre six-cylinder diesel pushing out 105 hp. The longer Hotchkiss engine required more space and a larger radiator, resulting in a somewhat inelegant front end. This model quickly acquired the nickname “nez de cochon” or “pig’s nose”…
By 1949, Chausson was the leading bus and coach builder in France, surpassing even Renault. But the competition was getting stiffer, so the AP-2 was given a significant re-fresh in 1952, resulting in the AP-52. The updated body incorporated front, middle, and rear doors which was becoming a popular design for city buses in Europe.
Once again, similar to its GM counterpart, a trolley bus and a Suburban/touring model were developed off the urban transit platform.
Chausson’s bus division was integrated into the Saviem Group in 1959, and the AP-52 was renamed SC-3 and 4. Production continued until 1964 when the front-engined design with a large “doghouse” was considered impractical, and was replaced by a new underfloor mid-engined model.
Over 13,000 AP series buses were produced over its eighteen year run – not quite the 38,000 of its contemporary GM Old Look, but quite successful nonetheless.
Thanks for this news. I love the description of the power sources for these buses. We had GM’s with Buick straight eights and Detroit Diesel 4-71’s. Also quite sluggish. Of course, in New York City, a 4-71 or a Buick gas engine is not a problem because the bus could not get up to any speed no matter due to the heavy traffic. Well, the outlying boroughs could perhaps see 30 MPH. Nothing has changed. I love the designs.
Attractive buses with nice paint jobs, the wrapping windshields definitely evoke (in me) the streetcar look.
I’ve seen pictures of these, but never knew their story. It’s a bit surprising to see front engine buses being used this late, but then there were some Austrian ones too.
Interesting some of their transits have 3 doors, must be great for fast stops. Very nice looking coaches.
That is unless the passengers must board at the front entrance to show the valid tickets or buy the tickets.
Hamburg decided to replace the trams with bi-articulated (two trailers) buses on a couple of lines (Metrobus 5 and Eilbus E86). The passengers are required to enter at the front entrance despite plenty of doors along the buses and trailers. It does take a very long time at each stop during the busy times.
These don’t look quite GM old-look to me – the windscreens are too large and low, the side pillars too thin and the glass too wide. It’s about halfway between the GM old and new looks, but closer to new to my eyes. Construction looks sturdy.
Cool post, Brophy-san!
I understand the Hotchkiss engine was the only petrol option, but there were several Diesels one could specify, depending on the model. Those included Somua, Henschel, Hispano-Suiza, Buda and Panhard mills.
Must be said that to be catching a Chausson to work sounds awfully stylish, even if that H-van-conked AP-2 rather shatters the illusion. Still, entirely preferable to my youth of getting a Volgren, which sounded not merely declasse but also vaguely obscene.
Is it my eyesight or does that B&W AP-2 photo have a Mercedes star on the front?
Definitely could be a Mercedes Star Justy though it is kind’a hard to see clearly.
A few pre-production early models were made during the war and may have used MB engines while France was occupied – just a guess….
Yes, that photo does look a bit off, doesn’t it? Dutch plates, too…
Not just Dutch plates; the destination sign says “Budel”, which is in The Netherlands. And the Mercedes star is perfectly clear to my eyes.
Not really surprising.
Nice buses .
-Nate