A few COAL’s ago I related the story of my trip to the local Chevrolet establishment circa 1981 where I was subjected to a salesperson’s harangue on the evils of (Japanese) sh*tboxes. That screed, together with a thinly veiled personal insult, drove me from that dealer’s door permanently while raising questions in my mind about a sales strategy that, looking forward, just might have had some actual limitations.
Fast forward a mere seven years, when that same dealership would now be selling on a daily basis sh*boxes assembled by not one, but three (Japanese) manufacturers: how do you like them apples? If evidence is required of a world in transition, you could do worse than cite my Heartbeat of America experience as exhibit number one. I often wonder if my benighted salesman was still on the employment rolls at ***** Chevrolet in 1989, and how (or if) he had adjusted to the brave new world instituted by his GM corporate overlords.
1981, the year of my General Motors epiphany, was marked by the ascendancy of Roger Smith to the helm of the storied company. GM had recently posted its first annual loss since the ’20’s, while navigating a plethora of problems including diminished market share, labor issues, abysmal quality control, and engineering disasters, not to mention lawsuits. Granted, it wasn’t the most opportune moment to take the reins of a lumbering leviathan of conflicting and conflicted interests, plus warring divisions and engineering fiefdoms whose reputations had been blackened and eyebrows singed by the exploding cigars of underbaked projects like the Vega and X-Cars. Faced with this plateful of disasters our man Mr. Smith soon demonstrated that perhaps he wasn’t the best man for the job.
Certainly the trials and tribulations the Chairman faced would have challenged and ultimately broken many old school American automotive executives. Faced with chaos, Smith responded by throwing a great many projects against the wall to see what would stick. These included the Saturn Division, the Aurora and Northstar boondoggles, the purchase of Electronic Data Systems and Hughes Aircraft Company(!), and the subject of this story, Geo, a semi-autonomous zone of the once indomitable Chevrolet Division.
The ultimate expression of the If-You-Can’t-Beat-‘Em-Join-‘Em philosophy, Geo came together in 1989 when deals were struck with Toyota, Suzuki, and Isuzu, respectively, to provide a variety of cars that would have a new badge applied on front and back and be sold as Geos. After sweating blood and treasure to produce a series of so-called game changing small cars starting with the Corvair and extending through the Vega, Chevette, and J-Cars, GM finally threw in the towel and hired someone else rather than go back to the drawing board once again. The fact that the General had plenty of perfectly acceptable small cars being screwed together by its overseas divisions across the globe and chose not to certify and ship them to the U.S. may seem puzzling, but many of Smith’s decisions seem odd in retrospect.
I became involved in this mess by way of the usual scenario: I had a failing set of wheels in the household and was looking for something cheap and preferably reliable to take its place. The vehicle in question was a ’76 Toyota Corolla that we had purchased (very) used from an . . . acquaintance. I was going to say friend, but perhaps a friend would not have sold us the Corolla. On the surface, it seemed like a rational decision as the car was clean, straight, and reputedly trouble free over the course of its lifetime. Its purpose in life once consigned to us was straightforward–it was meant to be an urban runabout as we had the Plymouth Reliant and later the Ford Aerostar as designated automotive jack-of-all-trades.
Our experience with our old Starlet (RIP) had given us no reason to doubt the general consensus concerning Toyotas in general, i.e. they may not dazzle but they wouldn’t let you down in the middle of a Puget Sound monsoon. The Starlet had proved to be bulletproof . . . not literally, and certainly not to the point of deflecting a charging Mustang GT, but maintenance-wise, it never required more than oil changes. The Corolla, on the other hand, soon began to defy conventional wisdom, and following the precedent set by my mid-60’s Teisco del Rey guitar, refused to stay in tune. Sad to say, its distributor seemed to have acquired a mind of its own. The mechanic at the local dealer would send it home with a clean bill of health and two weeks later I’d be out in the middle of a February rainstorm with a timing light attempting to get it to shape up and fly right. After a few rinse-and-repeat dealer quests, I gave up and just kept the timing light in the trunk for future application.
This scenario may have been amusing for awhile, but eventually it grew tiresome and we decided to look elsewhere for an urban gofer. Economics dictated a used heap, er, previously-owned vehicle, so for a few weeks I collected the local Auto Traders looking for something that might fit the bill. Eventually, my eyes lit on a silver 1990 Geo Metro five door for sale at a used car emporium on Aurora and so off I drove in the Toyota, hoping the it might hold its tune for another six or seven miles. The prospect in question seemed serviceable; like the Corolla, it was straight and there were no signs of abuse with less than 40,000 miles on the odometer. Negotiations ensued. The dealer, perhaps inspired by the Toyota mythos and a set of very nice sheepskin seat covers (which I hated) on the front seats of the Corolla, gave me a reasonable offer and the deal was quickly done.
By this time, we had advanced into the mid-90’s. The Metro had already been around for since ’89, and its predecessor, the Chevy Sprint for a few years before that. The little box had a well-earned reputation as a fuel miser, which certainly attracted me, but I also had liked the looks of the thing since its introduction, given its clean, futuristic, lines. It certainly didn’t look like it had issued forth from any known GM styling studio as neither a vinyl roof nor opera windows or lights were available even as options. Added to that stroke of fortune, as related elsewhere I’d already owned a Suzuki 400 motorcycle, so Metro ownership was like re-joining the family. Given those factors and my native predilection for wee foreign cars, perhaps the tiny Geo and I were fated to come together. The only fly in the ointment was the automatic transmission installed in the Metro in question, but I shrugged it off as we had teenagers in the house that would be learning to drive and I figured at least we wouldn’t be paying for clutch jobs.
I know what you’re thinking . . . a three speed automatic paired with a 49 horsepower 1.0 liter three cylinder? Hey, three speeds and three cylinders matched, at least in quantity. And after all, three speeds were one more than a Chevy Powerglide. A test drive had proven that the little Geo/Suzuki could get out of its own way, amazingly enough. And at least it revved past 3500 rpm, something the Corolla had been loath to do. Plus, there was the question of fuel economy: I thought the needle on the fuel gauge was never going to move during the first days of ownership. When it finally did budge, it proved to progress in very small increments indeed, yielding mileage in the mid 40’s on a consistent basis. As a bonus, I didn’t have to carry a timing light in the trunk.
The Metro actually came with a few creature comforts, including air conditioning and a stereo. The air option proved to be a nice bonus so long as you remembered to turn it off when attempting to merge onto the freeway, and god forbid that you push the A/C button when attempting to negotiate one of downtown Seattle’s infamous hills as roughly half the available horsepower were required to turn the A/C compressor. As if to offset that quirk, there was serviceable room front and back for driver and passengers, plus with five doors all seats and the boot were easily accessible. The space behind the hatch was a bit of a joke, but I didn’t need the Geo to carry two by fours or bags of cement, especially after acquiring the Aerostar. And the handling! The Metro proved to be extremely tossable, very much a point a shoot operation. At 1600 pounds, there was very little mass to shift and though there was not much of a contact patch given its 145/80 12 inch tires, if you started to lose grip a bit you could take consolation in the knowledge that replacing those tires would require only about twenty bucks a pop once tread wear became an issue.
In many ways the Metro proved to be an updated replacement for the old Starlet of sainted memory, except it was more handy, had four doors, cloth upholstery, and was actually stylish. Of course there were plenty of detractors who still retained the (Japanese) sh*tbox mentality of ye olde Chevy salesman, making fun of its size and . . . what else? The gas mileage? Its seating for four? Its ease of parking? Its sturdy mechanicals? Its FWD grip in the rain? As stated before in this space, there is a certain virtue in driving a car whose total performance you can use on a daily basis. What do those drivers do with their 700+ horsepower beasties whose entire performance envelope is available only on a dedicated racetrack where there remains a high possibility that the damned thing is going to kill you? There’s something to be said for pedal-to-the-metal forty horsepower zipsters that are very unlikely to get you into trouble even if you are trying.
In summary, I grew fond of the little Geo née Suzuki once I adjusted my driving style to take advantage of its virtues. As a bonus the kids learned to drive in it and what car could possibly be easier for passing a driving test? It was so compact and easy to see out of you could parallel park it without hardly trying. You couldn’t go fast enough to merit a speeding ticket and once you passed the driver’s test and had your license you didn’t have to spend all the proceeds from your first after-school job filling up the gas tank. The downside, of course, was that you most assuredly didn’t want to get in an accident with it, but then in our hands it really was pretty much limited to a low speed, in-town role with accompanying low speeds, save when I was commuting.
Given the old saw that all good things must come to an end, eventually the little Geo went the way of all flesh. Sometime after the 100,000 mile mark it began to guzzle more oil than gasoline and we faced an imminent engine rebuild. The time had come to move on to greener pastures, but we said farewell to the Metro with some regret, especially when it came time to visit the gas station. However, it came to be replaced with another fuel-sipper, although one that would never reach forty miles per gallon on a regular basis. But more on that anon.
It may be common knowledge that Suzuki sold the Metro under its own aegis in the USA as the Swift, including an actual hold-my-beer four cylinder 1.3 liter DOHC 16 valve 101 horsepower GTI version. You actually may have been able to get in trouble with that version but, sadly, Suzuki’s focus soon shifted to the nascent SUV market and run of the mill cars became more of an afterthought. For whatever reason, but mostly related to the fact that its forte was, and is, small cars and trucks, Suzuki always struggled in the U.S. market, finally throwing in the towel sometime during 2012.
Coincidentally, the following year we took a trip to the Antipodes to visit our son, who by virtue of marrying an Australian citizen had taken up residence in south Australia. In the midst of our Southern Hemisphere odyssey we flew to New Zealand’s South Island in order to see firsthand for ourselves the Southern Alps and try our hand at some of the notable tracks, or hiking trails as we Yanks are inclined to call them. We flew into Christchurch, and at the car rental counter, by luck of the draw, we were handed the keys to a newish Suzuki Swift, resplendent in a coppery red. I can’t say I checked in detail at the time, but odds are it would have been equipped with either a 1.2 or 1.3 liter DOHC 16 valve four (shades of the old GTI), plus a six-speed automatic, an important detail as I had enough on my plate adapting to my new task of driving on the left side of the road. Also, in another note, defying all convention I checked the box for comprehensive insurance given that I was faced with piloting an unfamiliar car in a foreign land with vehicles driving on the wrong side of the street. This proved to be a wise decision.
Fortunately, at least for me, all the byways we faced once we left the immediate environs of Christchurch, were two lane country roads, well marked and maintained, which eased the transition. Once I’d fixed in my mind that I simply needed to keep the road’s center line next to my right rather than left elbow, I got along swell. We set a course south by southeast toward Queenstown, our ultimate goal for the day being Te Anau, where we spent the night across the street from its majestic namesake lake. The following day we took the sometimes frightening road to Milford Sound, stopping along the way to hike some of the tracks not far removed from the highway, and then capped the day by catching a boat to capture the sights of the Sound itself, including, to our collective astonishment, a gray whale just off port bow. Should any Kiwis be reading this, your country is magnificent, and I would move there in an heartbeat if not for the logistics of shipping my guitars all that way.
Of course the question we are all waiting for is: what was the brand spanking new Suzuki Swift like to drive, particularly in reference to that earlier Swift/Metro in which I’d spent years of my commuting life?
The answer is, it was grand. Much progress had been made in the course of a decade and a half. Truth be told, the new Swift may have moved up a size in the ensuing years; it was certainly a good bit larger than the old Metro, if not as large as the hatchback I was most familiar with, a Mazda 3. The Suzuki’s engine was also only half as big as the Mazda’s, so you would expect a large power deficit, but given its more compact footprint and weight, the difference was not so noticeable as you might think. All in all, the Swift was comfortable, secure, a great handler, and a spritely partner for the challenging roads of the mountainous South Island.
Our one moment of vexation occurred as we circled our way around the southernmost tip of the island and headed up the west coast toward Dunedin. You recall that I ticked the box for comprehensive insurance? Good thing, as a grapefruit sized rock came off a dump truck and hit the Swift square in the windshield. Of all the many dozens of rental cars I’ve driven in my life, this was my sole instance of suffering anything like reportable damaged and it was the only occasion when I had relied on something other than my own auto insurance in the event of disaster. Sometimes Karma works in your favor.
We dropped the smitten Suzuki off at the agency in Christchurch, pointing out the damage while referring to our insurance policy with the starred category listing glass damage coverage. The agent noted the cracked and scarred windshield on his form, shook my hand, and we were off to Melbourne with overall fond memories of our old Metro’s red and copper-headed stepchild, which had grown up to be a capable and memorable addition to the Suzuki family tree.
I would end our story there if not for an even more recent encounter with a veritable contemporary Suzuki, although in this instance I didn’t have the good fortune to drive it.
On a recent trip to hike the Austrian Alps and Italian Dolomites, as is our custom we took note of all the new machinery that, given our national proclivities, we are denied in the United States. These included various Citroëns, Fiats, Opels, and . . . Suzukis. One class conspicuous by its absence in the Home of the Brave is the shoebox SUV (pronounced ‘SOOV’ in Italy). Most of the world seems in fact to have been overtaken by the same SUV virus that is virulent in the USA, the only difference being that it draws the limit at Cadillac Escalades the size of two bedroom ranch houses in the suburbs. Subsequently, many pint-sized utility vehicles roam the streets, many of them interesting and desirable, particularly when I think how useful they would be on Pacific Northwest Forest Service roads where they could handily dodge the potholes that are legion and often three feet deep.
Interestingly enough, the little Suzuki Ignis is one of the pocket SUV’s most represented, at least on the narrow and winding roads of the Tyrol. I found myself attracted once again to a tiny Suzuki, with the caveat that any dream of owning the little critter would be immediately crushed by the prospect of having to wait the requisite twenty-one years before I could import one and by then all cars will be electric anyway, and I will likely be hiking that great track in the sky. All the same, it’s comforting to know that Suzuki (including the current fourth generation Swift) still flourishes in other markets and appears to be going from strength to strength in those locales where its relatively small size is still considered a net positive.
Forza, Suzuki! Long may it wave.
Speaking of the evils of (American) sh*tboxes, does GM still own a controlling share of Suzuki and Isuzu? I thought they sold them off after the 2008ish bankruptcy. Also hasn’t a DS on Geo been already done?
Google says GM sold all its shares of both Suzuki and Isuzu in 2006. I checked the DS catalog and found an entry for Daewoo (Pontiac LeMans), but nothing for Geo. Maybe Paul can chime in?
I miss having this class of car available here. It reminds me of my 83 Colt, only with fewer cylinders and gears. And probably fewer cubic feet both inside and outside, too. I kind of like that one you drove in NZ. One thing I do not miss is cars that require the a/c to be switched off for merging onto a highway or climbing a hill.
It is funny how regular exposure to expensive or exotic cars in daily life can make a guy perfectly satisfied and happy with a well-made sh*tbox.
I kept threatening to buy a Fiat 500, but I’ve had enough experience with automotive orphans to walk that plank again. A quick search show that the Hyundai Accent, Kia Rio, Nissan Versa, Mitsubishi Mirage, and Mini are classified as subcompacts, but seriously, the Mini? Those things have gotten huge. Did they discontinue the Chevy Spark? That really was tiny by today’s standards.
I have to say that the Metro was better built than most of the exotics I worked on…
“… The air option proved to be a nice bonus so long as you remembered to turn it off when attempting to merge onto the freeway… ”
That was normal for most small a/c cars of that era, even cars with a bit more power and manual transmissions.
My 1982 four cylinder 5-speed 75 hp Honda Accord had a similar issue. With four adults (two of whom were kinda large) on board and approaching a long rise on the NJ Turnpike, it was necessary to turn off the A/C so the column of 18 wheelers behind us did not have to pull into the center lane to pass us (which would have surely triggered my sense of claustrophobia and perhaps other mental issues as well).
Reportedly, this is not an issue with current model Accords.
Same issue with my mother’s A Body 1983 Buick Century with the Iron Puke 4. Want to pass someone on the road in the summertime? Turn off the A/C, gun it, pass them, and THEN turn the AC a back on.
Well, I don’t recall ever really passing anyone in the Metro, even with the a/c off!
Seems like my last car where you could feel the a/c compressor kick in was a 2002 model. I never turn the a/c off anymore…I just leave it on auto and it removes the humidity and keeps everything defrosted, plus I imagine the mpg difference is minimal.
Doesn’t the current Accord have a 1.5 liter four? Of course it’s turbocharged and probably churns out 300 horsepower.
Current Accord makes 192hp from a turbocharged 1.5 liter four. Compared to the first gen, it has more than double the horsepower and perhaps 50% more weight.
I had a 1995 Geo Metro. I actually loved it. I drove it regularly between NYC and Toronto and sure, it was uncomfortable, noisy, had no cruise control, and was underpowered but still, it was a seat-of-your-pants adventure. I remember getting rust repair work done on it and driving it back from the body shop it was immediately rear-ended by a local semi-famous real estate agent in Toronto and us driving straight back to the body shop for still more work. I regret selling that car.
Ah, another satisfied Metro owner! I don’t recall it being too uncomfortable, but then I’m a pretty compact-sized American. Can’t imagine anything more discouraging than getting in an accident on your way home from the body shop!
I am just under 6’4″ it was uncomfortable for 9-hour road trips between NYC and Toronto. Some thicker, wider seats, cruise control, and sound deadening would have helped. But it still was a great car and I forgot to mention, I owned it for 12 years and it N E V E R broke down. Just maintenance. I sold it to a kid for his first car. I felt like I betrayed that pristine GEO Metro.
I’ve long sort of wondered what these Metros were like; they used to be all over the place, but I never drove or rode in one. Thanks for the you-are-there.
As to the forbidden fruit: a 21-year wait would exempt it from US emissions certification, but you’d hafta wait 25 years to bring a foreign-spec car onto the American regulatory island despite its lack of US safety certification. Because the US is right and the entire rest of the world is wrong and stuff.
I stand corrected! Let’s see, 2022 plus 25…2047! I’m afraid they will have pulled my license by then, sad to say. But at least I’ll be safe from scary overseas rolling traffic hazards.
I owned and COALd the predecessor, a 4-door Chevy Sprint. By virtue of the 5-speed and lack of A/C, it was almost sprightly, and yes, a bit tossable.
Would I want to own something similar today? Probably not, but it doesn’t matter, since no such thing is available in the US.
I had a friend that drove a Chevy Sprint into the ground. He had over 200,000 miles on it when it died. He never really had any problems with it.
With all the gigantic trucks on the road today I’m afraid I’m with you…I wouldn’t feel safe in something like the Metro. On the other hand, it was better than riding a motorcycle.
I saw the new Fiat 500 in Italy–one fully electric version has suicide doors! Serious jonesing for that one.
We have a lot in common here. I loved the Metro/Sprint, and as a matter of fact, once rented one just like yours. I too was pleasantly surprised at its eager and nimble personality, even with the automatic. As you noted, the key to that is to just give it the spurs. Most Americans want to feel a strong surge of power at lower rpm, which these don’t provide.
As to the current crop of little cars, I very much wish they were available here. As you noted, bopping down forest roads in one is so much better than crashing through in a big SUV/truck. I’ve become totally addicted to them, hence my xB and the (Suzuki) Tracker, which is still hanging around.
Just mentioned above the electric Fiat 500 with suicide doors that I saw in Italy. 500’s are still all over the place in Seattle–seems like there’d be a market for the electric one, at least. That should have plenty of scoot.
My daughter in Portland (or Beaverton, if you want to get technical) just acquired a second generation Scion xB, which replaced our old Saab 9-5. Some tears were shed over that, but it was getting to be too much trouble and expense to keep the Saab on the road.
Surprised no mention of the Geo Spectrum in the ad.
I was 13 when these came out. I thought the 4 door Metro was a handsome and slick looking little car.
Apparently the Spectrum was sold for only one year, in ’89? Hard to find any info online, interestingly enough.
Glad someone else has the good taste to appreciate the Metro’s finer qualities!
I don’t really have anything to say to the COAL itself, only that it was nice to read as usual on Wednesday from you.
These cars, despite being branded Suzuki Swift, are really popular in Hungary, where there is a Suzuki factory in Esztergom, close to the Slovak borders. This generation was made there until 2003, so there are still many on the Hungarian roads.
On the other hand, I have a brief experience with the 2010-2017 Swift. My parents were shopping for a small car and they got very close to buying a Swift. In 2021, there were many to choose from in Slovakia. Me and my father had driven an 20K km example from 2016. I really liked the car, the drive, the interior and would be able to live with its small trunk, the only seeming disadvantage. But my father could not and picked out a 2017 Škoda Fabia instead. In the time of buying that Fabia, a Swift Sport with 1.6 136 hp engine was for sale near us, with 20-something thousand kms, grey, 5 doors and pretty loaded, just like that Fabia was, even with the same advertised price!
I imagined buying it later from my parents, when they would get tired of it or would not use it anymore. That will not happen and sadly (for me), the Swift Sport prices aren’t getting lower that much.
Thanks for your kind words!
I was surprised to see all the places the Swift was, and is, manufactured around the globe. Really is a world car.
I enjoyed looking at the Skodas on our recent trip–they seem well differentiated from their VW and SEAT brethren. I was intrigued, too, to see quite a few CUPRA’s. I was completely unaware of them.
The Fabia did seem pretty nice, but like you, I probably would have gone with the Swift.
Really liked reading about this positive ownership experience with the Metro. 1,600 pounds seems so featherweight compared to even the smallest, lightest cars available today. And that fuel economy sounds great with today’s gas prices.
To sort of echo JP Cavanaugh’s idea above, I have spent time thinking about what it would take to bring a small, really basic car back to new car showrooms. I suppose that current safety equipment levels / expectations / etc. negates that idea to some extent. But what about only the stuff that’s needed? Along with crank windows and power assist on only the stuff that’s needed (like steering and brakes)?
I’m sure someone smarter than me has thought of this and has a list of reasons why this would be implausible, but I can’t help but think there would be a ready-made market for such a car.
Great essay.
Thanks, Joseph!
I was just looking at the specs of the Mitsubishi Mirage online–it pretty much flies under the radar but in some ways meets your criteria, although it seems to come pretty fully equipped rather than stripped and basic. It does have a 76 hp 1.2 liter 3 cylinder, though, so its the closest thing for sale in the U.S. to the Metro.
I wonder if the Chinese or Vietnamese will address the lower end of the market in the U.S., or if the business plan just wouldn’t work. With everything going electric it will be interesting to see.
“Everything going electric”- bingo. I think that automatically puts the possibility a small, cheap car out of contention. But still, even technology trickles down and becomes better and less expensive with time (i.e. computers). Great food for thought.
That little old Suzuki triple is a real gem. They just want to rev and rev. And rev. No limiter apparently. For those who haven’t driven one, the triple sounds extremely busy but is amazingly willing and responsive, compared with the BMC, Ford, Mazda, and Mitsubishi fours of my experience. In 610kg of car it goes really well with a five-speed; I’m trying to imagine that mighty motor paired with an auto and aircon in a bigger five-door body. My ’84 Swift was the bare bones rarely-seen GA model, and though its been gone from our household for ten years now (though it remains in the tribe), as I write this I can still remember the sound of that engine. Sound deadening? What’s that?
The Suzuki three really did remind me of a motorcycle engine in some ways, which seems reasonable enough. I have to wonder if the engineering team came over from the motorcycle division.
I’m sure the five speed version would have been a more natural pairing with the little three. I never had the opportunity to drive one, which is probably just as well. I never knew what I was missing.
A mate whom was into bikes said it was a motorcycle engine, though the dealership mechanics reckoned it wasn’t. Sure was fun to drive though. Now on semi-retirement as a farm runabout.
Nice article, Steven. I too enjoy time in a subcompact as they remind me of a time when truly small cars were common. I still think there’s a place for these in more or less urban environments; and if the average American could be convinced that they do not in fact actually drive hundreds of miles a day across the great plains, tow ocean-going vessels, carry entire sports teams in a single car, or daily trek off-road in the wilderness, then they might see the utility (so to speak) of an economical, space-efficient vehicle. But those realizations are not likely to arrive on these shores anytime soon…so we’ll leave the market for reasonable vehicles that are realistically sized and suited to the conditions under which most drivers actually drive to those in other countries.
Thanks Jeff! I have to admit that the American fetish for huge vehicles is beyond me. Giant trucks and SUV’s everywhere. I’ve been waiting fifty years for people to come to their senses. I’m starting to think it may not happen…
Thanks for the article. As already alluded above here in Central Europe where those were (and are still) made you get to see them on a regular basis although the older models are slowly becoming extinct. Here in Austria Suzuki I believe sells more cars than Honda but then its vehicles fit European tastes and needs very well.