And so, dear reader, in our last installment our Plymouth Reliant wagon was nearing the the end of its useful life. A blown head gasket, accompanied by billows of white smoke on I-5, had unnerved me. As always when an automotive issue arose, my Dad’s verdict on a car that had passed the tipping point between useful conveyance into thorn-in-the-flesh territory began to play on infinite loop in my head; there were times when you had to cut your losses. At some juncture matters went beyond mere safety and economic considerations. What if Linda, who was a NICU and transport nurse, had been driving on a late night call? Something had to be done and quickly. And so the gears began to turn.
The usual research proceeded, but what exactly would be the criteria? Thirty years on the details are murky. So far as I can tell my programming as an American consumer kicked in and I began to feel that innate urge for something bigger and better, whether it be automobile, house, or guitar amplifier. The house came after the car in quick succession (the amplifier came somewhat later). But first of all, let’s focus on the automobile, or more specifically, the minivan. The size of our growing family seemed to dictate that we second the choice many of our friends and neighbors were making; eight years after I’d dismissed the emergent Chrysler minivan as too extravagant for our needs, it now appeared arguably essential, even though previous generations of Americans had managed just fine without one. At the same. time, logically speaking, an argument could be made for the domestic minivan’s utility, and I admit I succumbed to current practice despite my former predilection for reasonably-sized Eurotrash cars. Fortunately, the Reliant had served as a step between the Toyota Starlet and a looming maxi-van (the term, ‘mini’ had become suspect), so the prospect of piloting one wasn’t quite like going from a VW Beetle to a Greyhound bus or a frigate to an aircraft carrier, no matter my misgivings.
Minivan dimensions were definitely growing at that point with extended versions for each of the major players, but so was the minivan market circa 1992: joining the original Chrysler trio were the Chevy Astro, the Toyota Previa, the Mazda MPV, and the Ford Aerostar. None of the others followed the Mopar blueprint, whose founding principles seemed so completely obvious that it’s difficult to comprehend how any car designer worth his or her salt could look at a fresh sheet of drafting paper and contemplate anything other than a FWD layout with a big box hung on the back (how about the GM Dustbusters, you may ask? Go ahead, I’m not listening). The reasons dictating a departure from the obvious solution may have been legion, but most likely they all came down to the usual dollars and cents. Why pay the engineers overtime for a clean sheet design when you could cobble up something from the parts bin and call it a day?
We can readily admit that Toyota didn’t exactly take this route given that they ended up with the world’s premier mid-engined minivan, although the fact is the Previa’s predecessor (and assorted JDM Nissans and Mitsubishis) used a similar layout. If the Toyota boffins had solid reasons for taking the mid-engine route, no one else seemed eager to follow and the admittedly futuristic and forward looking (at least styling-wise) Previa proved to be a dead end, plus it was pricey for a package that offered what everyone else was selling for less. As for the other entrants in the minivan sweepstakes, they convinced themselves that what the consumer really wanted was just another conventional front-engined, rear wheel drive van, only smaller, the result being the Astro, MPV, and Aerostar.
Given the choice of the offerings, it seems logical that I would have driven a sample of each and then made an informed decision, and in fact on a trip I had rented the latest Plymouth Voyager and put a good 1500 miles on it. I had no complaints about the Voyager…it was certainly the best looking of the available options and very handy but eight years of Plymouth ownership had left me eager to play the field. The Astro was also a familiar quantity as some of our friends had purchased GM’s earliest entrant in the minivan wars, but after having had the occasion to drive a few I scratched my head and wondered why as there appeared to be no place down there by the pedals to put my feet. Whether it was a feature or a bug, the lack of foot space seemed a puzzling engineering choice, but then GM marched to the beat of its own drum in those days. Also, truth be told, GM’s interiors had not progressed significantly from the standard set by the Citation a decade earlier, so the Astro was quickly stricken from the list. Mazda, unfortunately, was off my radar although we had friends who would later buy one and it provided good service over a long life. That oversight remains puzzling to this day as Mazda would loom large in my selection process in years to come.
That left the Aerostar.
I had no strong stake nor skin in the GM/Ford wars, despite the fact that my Dad had been a longstanding GM man, with the exception of a low mileage ’61 Ford Fairlane he’d bought from the estate of the town postmistress when she passed away. He apparently was not terribly fond of it as it lasted less than four years before he went back to the GM fold with the purchase of a ’65 Buick Electra 225, which of course was a whole other kettle of fish. Buick had been his preferred marque for most of his life. I’d come home from the hospital in a ’52 sedan, which had then been replaced by a ’58 station wagon, a car well placed in the running for the most overwrought design ever committed to sheet metal. The interloper Fairlane remained, then, an exception to the rule. Remaining antipathy for Fords may have set up residence in his genes, however, as he often told the story of his father bringing his first car home, a Ford Model T, only to run it through the side of the barn when it wouldn’t “whoah” when ordered. So, Grandpa Roan, a natural horseman who was renowned for his way with animals, may not have long remained a Ford man, but then apparently he wasn’t altogether comfortable with the results of the Industrial Revolution, either. On the other hand my maternal grandfather was a Buick devotee like my Dad and I have a firm memory of riding in his (altogether more attractive than a ’58) ’57 sedan on a trip to California. GM loyalty, then, seemed to run in the family, but ever the iconoclast, I was happy to fly in the face of convention, with my string of various funny foreign cars offered as proof.
Dedicated readers may recall that I’d had my own experience with Fomoco in the shape of ’74 Mercury, née Ford, Capri, which, at least by 1992, had receded into rose-tinted memories. With no apparent axe to grind, I decided to take a look at the refreshed-for-’92 Aerostar and came away impressed. The interior seemed a cut above the competition and the extended version left space for a considerable amount of cargo, even with all seven passenger seats full. The Aerostar had actually been around since ’86, so it seemed well-proven, and besides, it was basically built on the chassis (with some modifications) of the Ranger pickup that had first appeared in ’82. Essentially, it was a truck, and trucks are tough and reliable, am I right? So my internal argument went.
The local Ford dealer seemed happy enough to sell me one and the transaction proved relatively painless. As delivered our Aerostar was a fairly basic (beige? tan?) XL Extended, not the high-zoot XLT or Eddy Bauer edition. As such, it came with the base 3.0 liter Vulcan (‘live long and prosper’) V-6, a new design that had first seen duty in the Taurus and had no basis in the old Cologne 2.8 that had powered my Capri. That information may have been a moot point, given that an actual engine was barely visible from under the abbreviated hood–there could have been a fusion reactor under there and I would have been none the wiser. The purported V-6 reportedly hooked up with a four-speed OD automatic, my first ever slushbox. Included in the deal was air conditioning (okay, so maybe it’s needed in Seattle after all), AM-FM radio, and cruise control, but the rest of the mod-cons like power windows, mirrors, seats and a tape deck were off the table. All the same, the interior was an attractive place to spend time with plush upholstery and carpeting even in the cargo area together with a comprehensive instrument panel and a commanding perch high above the ubiquitous Puget Sound traffic jams.
The Aerostar experience began well enough, but quickly deteriorated. The bloom was hardly off the rose when one winter afternoon as I was merging onto SR520 traffic slowed abruptly in front of me, then came to a dead stop. The driver behind me remained blissfully unaware of this fact until he plowed straight into the rear of our new Aerostar. The damage was extensive, the rear sheet metal pushed all the way up into the rear wheel wells. There was no question as to who was at fault and consequently the guilty party’s insurance company quickly took control. The crippled van was flat-bedded posthaste to a nearby collision center staffed by a nice young man in a white shirt and tie. As I had served time at the infamous Bertone of North Seattle, I was somewhat surprised to find such a formality in an office covered with bondo dust, but I realized with a resigned sigh that the world was indeed changing. The rest of the encounter seemed convincing enough, with all the technical details covered competently. The insurance provided us with a late model Buick Century, which wasn’t exactly in the minivan class, but I was unfazed, assuming the repairs wouldn’t take an inordinate amount of time as they involved the Aerostar’s rear end and didn’t impact the drive train.
But things never go smoothly, do they? A few days later as I followed the progress of repairs, word came that my father passed away. One of the details that had been circling my mind during this period was the certainty of Dad’s imminent death and the looming necessity of having a car that would get us to his funeral services with a minimum of fuss, and now here we were with a severely damaged Aerostar in the shop for the duration. I called the insurance company: was it acceptable to take the Buick on an extended trip out of state? It was. We made the long trip from Washington and the Blue Mountains of Oregon through a bleak midwinter of Idaho snow and ice back home to the Rockies and truth be told, I was glad to have a FWD car in those conditions. And somehow it seemed appropriate that we were driving a Buick.
The long drive gave me occasion to reflect on my father life. In some respects his story was Capra-esque; there were elements of George Bailey from It’s a Wonderful Life in his long history. Not only did he assist in the running of a Building and Loan, but his father had died when Dad was only twenty-four and recently engaged to be married. He promised his father on his deathbed that he would care for his younger brother and sisters and was true to his word. He took over the family ranch, which dashed any dreams of going to college. Instead, he provided the means for his siblings to attend, his younger brother earning a Masters Degree, his sister rising all the way to Dean of the College of Child Development at USU. Later in life, aside from helping initiate the aforementioned Savings and Loan, he became a real estate broker and had just established a real estate company with his brother when he watched him die when struck by a car while crossing the street. By some terrible twist of fate as a teen he’d watched his youngest brother die when his horse fell on top of him. Add to that the deaths of his parents at relatively young ages, an older sister, and three of his children. My father was not unacquainted with grief.
Dad was forty-five when I was born. By the time I was sixteen he was in his sixties. He came from a world that I could only vaguely imagine and his experience seemed far removed from mine, but we probably never begin to understand our fathers until we have reached a stage in life where we can look back with some clarity and are able to brush aside what we think we knew and begin to understand what really happened. Dad often seemed remote, but he was a quiet and thoughtful man, and a gentleman in the true sense of the word. He treated my mother as an equal. He seldom raised his voice (except perhaps when uncooperative cattle were involved) and never resorted to corporal punishment in an age when it was not only accepted but expected. I had friends who were afraid of their fathers. I was never afraid of mine.
I wasn’t as young as my Dad was when he lost his father but there was still much of the world I didn’t clearly understand and I would miss his advice and wisdom as I blundered my way forward. From my perspective now, I realize that I am more like him than I would have thought possible (and, sadly, not necessarily in the more positive aspects), this despite the fact that when I was younger we seldom saw eye-to-eye. But then why would we? He raised his children to think for themselves. Our family routinely talked politics and world affairs at the dinner table, but he never dictated his position, expecting everyone to fall in line. We could express ourselves without condemnation or belittlement. I don’t know what he’d make of our current situation, as he believed in talking things through and reaching something like an understanding of differing positions if not consensus. He might find our world somewhat less comprehensible than the one he came from.
As we returned to our Buick loaner from his graveside, I didn’t quite understand the depth of my sadness in that moment (only compounded five years later when my mother joined him), but I thought that I might be able to incorporate what I knew of his life into my own and treat people as he did, fairly, openly, and kindly. I often fail, but I’m not discouraged. His example doesn’t dim with the passing years, and I may yet reach my goal.
But this is also a story about the Aerostar, after all, and we must proceed. In 1992 I was back in school, finishing up a degree and teaching, returning to Seattle from Idaho in time for the end of the quarter and the usual stack of term papers to grade. I would check in with the collision center when I had a spare moment, but the days stretched into weeks and the van wasn’t released into our hands until the beginning of the next year. The techs did a reasonable job–the quarter panels and tailgate had to be replaced, and the cargo area floor, as well. The paint match was good and the big (mini?) Ford seemed to drive fine and so the experience was filed away as just another one of those things.
But when we took a trip the following summer, I was stunned to find a pool of anti-freeze beneath the Aerostar on a relative’s driveway. I checked the slice of the engine bay visible from under the hood and couldn’t see a source of the leak, but as we drove home I had to add coolant a couple of times. Once home, it was off to the dealer, where the diagnosis was…a defective head gasket. At less than 10,000 miles. Wait, wasn’t a blown head gasket the reason I’d gotten rid of the Reliant in the first place? The service manager was apologetic and slightly embarrassed. The verdict was it had been one of those inexplicable manufacturing mistakes and of course the head gaskets were replaced under warranty, everything was buttoned up, and the van was sent forth to sin no more.
At less than 20,000 miles, the brake master cylinder failed. Now, wait a minute. I began to wonder if the accident had cast a spell over the rest of the car, but realistically, how could a rear end collision affect a head gasket and the the master cylinder? Again, the service manager registered dismay and promptly took care of the problem, but my faith was shaken. Around the same time the Aerostar had its first brake service. New front pads were required at a little over 20,000 miles. Paranoia began to rear its ugly head. Like clockwork, at least every ten thousand miles some other problem would crop up, plus there was a leak in one of the rear taillights, so the van returned to the collision center with concerns about imminent rust creeping in. And then every spring it was time for new brake pads, often with less than another 10,000 miles on the clock. Then the air conditioning went out. And the transmission started leaking fluid. All while friends extolled the virtues of their Aerostars that went 150,00 miles with only oil changes.
If you don’t see a pattern, well, I certainly did. The Aerostar soldiered on, although it’s likely that it was my pocketbook and I doing the soldiering. When its transmission failed at around 100,ooo miles, the jig was up. By that point we’d begun to question the need for such a lumbering leviathan, anyway. Some of the kids were out of the nest by then, so why waste all our resources, both in fuel and constant maintenance bills, to keep sending an ailing Aerostar down the road? At various times as service invoices piled up I’d considered a replacement. I came close to signing the papers for a new Dodge Caravan but then got cold feet after reading about the Chrysler minivans lunching their transmissions. I looked long and hard at a Taurus wagon before I had a moment of enlightenment: was I really going to buy another Ford? Had I fallen prey to Stockholm Syndrome? I checked out a used Toyota Previa at a nearby Acura dealer because Toyota=reliable, but was treated so high-handedly and quoted such a laughable price that I beat a hasty retreat. In the end, I settled for something quite different, a vehicle whose entire engine was visible when the hood was propped open. Would it hunt? Would it prove to be reliable? Was it funny and foreign?
Watch this space!
Ford of the early 90s was a funny place. Their interiors were wonderful, and their assembly quality was quite good. And the basic pieces were (usually) very good. The 3.0 was part of Good Ford and yours must have been an anomaly. But then there always seemed to be some Bad Ford lurking in the shadows of many of their cars and trucks in those years. At least you didn’t hold out for 3 years and buy a Windstar. At least I hope you didn’t.
Your father sounds like he was a wonderful guy so you could do worse than to turn into him as you got older. But it is true that we pick up some of our parents’ worst features too. And going from a 61 Fairlane to an Electra 225 – there was an automotive quantum leap if ever there was one.
This may be irrelevant information now, but when you are dealing with the insurance company of the guy who destroyed your minivan, you are completely within your rights to demand a rough equivalent to the damaged vehicle as a rental, even though the adjuster will want to cheap out and give you something smaller. But then again there was a kind of rightness about the Buick for that funeral.
The Aerostar caused enough trauma that even to this day if I was tempted to consider a Ford, my wife would veto any such move. And no, I didn’t buy a Windstar, although I confess I took a look when it was introduced.
I don’t know if the Buick purchase was simply a reaction against the plebeian Fairlane or if he just got a really good deal. Probably the latter! It was a beautiful car in 1965. I do remember that he brought home a demo Pontiac Bonneville overnight, but the Electra won out.
I agree I should have demanded an equivalent loaner…maybe I was worried they’d give me an Astro.
Thank you Steven for another well-written and moving entry. Your father sounds like quite the guy and your use of “Capra-esque” seems quite appropriate. Capra did a wonderful (so to speak) job of capturing the spirit and character of his particular spot in the history of this country; and that in turn was characterized by a Depression-era population that prized and honored the ability to make the best of what they were dealt…particularly when what they were dealt was pretty crappy. This is not to say that our present day culture does not still occasionally produce the “Capra-esque”, but there is so much more going on nowadays that seems to dilute any story-teller’s ability to capitalize on tales about such folks and their moments. Anyway, that’s a whole other discussion.
I’ll just add that your dad’s apparent stoicism in the face of so many personal encounters with the death of loved ones is quite something. He must have been a very strong man.
As to the vehicle, I have to say that it was interesting to read an account of life with a Ford minivan. The whole minivan period has come (and now may be fading) during my adult car-buying life, and I have NEVER known anyone personally who has had anything other than a Chrysler product or a Honda. OK, one Toyota. But the Chrysler and Honda vans are/were so prevalent in my area, even seeing a Ford or GM (I’ve seen more GMs than Fords) minivan on the road around here was an unusual sight and cause for comment…as well as non-vocalized thoughts about “why would anyone have to buy one of those?” 😉 Your research was illuminating. For example, I had no idea that they were on the Ranger platform.
Oh, and about that accident…man, I would have been all over that insurance company to try to get them to total the vehicle. Both rear quarters AND the cargo floor? Time (IMO) to make that van someone else’s problem.
For example, I had no idea that they were on the Ranger platform.
They weren’t actually. The only things shared with the Ranger was the front suspension and of course some drive trains. But the rear coil suspension was totally different, and the Aerostar had a unique unibody hypbrid, with a unitized structure and frame rails, but not a genuine BOF vehicle like the Ranger.
There goes my “it’s really a truck” argument that I made to convince myself of the wisdom of my decision!
Thank you, Jeff…I remember being stunned by the parallels to my Dad when I first saw It’s a Wonderful Life in the ’80’s. You’re right about the limited likelihood of Capra’s work being replicated today. We’re probably too cynical, for one thing. At least we can still watch the old ones when we get the urge.
I’ve driven iterations of the current minivans except for the KIA version. They’re not that different from the Aerostar except for the modern bells and whistles. They are still the most efficient means to cart around seven or more people, much more so than the three row SUV’s. But they aren’t fashionable.
I’m sure the Aerostar wasn’t totaled because it was practically brand new. Aside from the taillight that sprang a leak, I have to say that I never noticed any aftermath from the repairs. The rest of the problems have to laid at the feet of Ford itself. But I’m with you–if I was involved in a crash like that today I’d likely want to move on.
“…Grandpa Roan, a natural horseman…”
LOL, your writing style is great along with the subtle humor.
My 95 Voyager just returned from a 2600 mile round trip to FL with its original head gaskets (3.3L V6).
Thanks!
Probably should have bought the Voyager after all. Hats off to your ’95. Quite a survivor.
“I had friends who were afraid of their fathers. I was never afraid of mine… … We could express ourselves without condemnation or belittlement… “
I feel that the above is as good a definition of a great father that I have ever read.
3.0 Vulcan and failing Ford systems
While we did not have any issues with the 3.0 Vulcan in our 1990 Sable, sometime after the second or third year of ownership each of the major systems (a/c, power steering, transmission, and other smaller stuff) would require major infusions of money to keep things running as designed.
That’s too bad because we liked the size and comfort of the Sable wagon and if it had been more solid for a longer time, we would have stayed in the Ford/Mercury family.
My many (well 3 or 4) Taurus company cars were all less than two years old; DEC/Compaq/HP wisely replaced them before such system issues arose. Indeed, the DEC company car program got such good deals on new Fords that it was considered a profit center when trading in the two year old and mostly lightly used vehicles.
The Ford head gasket issue was supposed to be owned by the torquey but notorious 3.8 Essex V6, not the dearly beloved 3.0 Vulcan. That seems like just pure bad luck; the kind of bad luck that has caused me to cross off ever buying most of the car makes in the world. ;-}
Thank you RL.
What I didn’t have space for in the story was that my Dad’s last car was an ’88 Sable. He had sold some property and the buyer owned a Mercury-Lincoln dealership and gave him a new car in partial payment. He drove the Sable until he died and I recall asking him at some point what his all-time favorite car was and without stopping to think he replied that it was the Sable. My Mom drove it until she passed away and aside from a broken windshield I don’t recall her having any issues with it.
Interesting about the company cars. The Taurus sold so well in its early years I can see why it made sense to do a trade in after two years.
My 1986 Ranger still used the 2.9 liter Köln V6 but it was very reliable, at least until I sold it to accommodate our growing family at about 80k miles and 9 years. That was 4wd with an A4OD transmission. I know I replaced the brake pads but I can’t recall if that was due to wear or also because one front rotor warped; I do remember being surprised that there was enough meat on the rotor to get it surfaced at a local parts store for about $15. I also replaced tie rod ends which transformed the steering precision from awful to merely OK. New shocks helped a lot too. But your story isn’t really about the Ford, and thanks again for an interesting and insightful tale of family.
Only goes to show what a crap shoot buying a car can be. Maybe Ford should have stuck with the Köln V6, but there seem to be plenty of testimonials for the Vulcan. Supposedly it was more compact. The Ranger always seemed to have a good reputation, which was one of the reasons why I thought the Aerostar was a good choice.
Thanks for the kind words…
Another excellent read. I appreciate your writing about your father and your relationship. it’s a tough subject, one that still challenges me as a father to two sons. Big time…
Sounds like you got one of the bad Aerostars; not exactly a shining representative of Ford’s Job #1 efforts.
Thanks, Paul. I have sons of my own, and a million regrets. You always think you can do a better job than your parents until you actually have kids.
I was talking about the Aerostar with my wife while writing the story. She really liked all its good qualities and still remembers how good it was for long trips. And she still will never buy another Ford…
This is becoming another fine thread that covers so much more ground than it set out to .
The hardest job I’ve ever had is fatherhood .
-Nate
I spent a good amount of time driving such an Aerostar. My aunt and uncle bought an Eddie Bauer extended length Aerostar, in part because they owned a store and had need for occasional hauling. In the middle and late 1990s, I worked in their store, and gladly offered to make deliveries to customers whenever I could (it was more enjoyable to deliver boxes than to work inside).
I found the Aerostar good to drive for what it was — a big, versatile van. Certainly not exciting to drive, but much better than an actual cargo van, and the Aerostar handled a whole lot of cargo. I was also able to borrow it when I bought a huge (used) couch – it’s useful to know people who have big vans.
But their van was not without problems. I recall them having transmission problems, and also and endless array of electrical maladies. Not nearly as bad as what you dealt with, though.
Regarding your father, my own father was a product of similar circumstances – having faced the early death of a parent and having a tremendous weight of responsibility thrust on him at an early age. Only as an adult was I able to fathom what he himself must have gone through as a teen. Like your dad, he struck me as being remote when I was younger, but in reality he was one of the fairest and most compassionate people I’ve ever known.
The Aerostar was unmatched for hauling stuff once you took out the back rows of seats. I remember bringing home a new refrigerator in the box, although it was a tight fit. Almost as good as having a pickup, except for the fact that all that space was carpeted so you didn’t want to get carried away for fear of wrecking it.
I appreciate that our fathers had those things in common. If mine had all kinds of issues from his trauma it would have been understandable, but he seemed to rise above the pain and certainly never took it out on anyone else. He broke down only a couple of times and revealed a little bit of himself, but it was a rare thing and made an impression.
Another well written article that’s far deeper than just automotive memory .
“it’s a tough subject, one that still challenges me as a father to two sons. Big time…”
Agreed Paul, that you hang in there makes you better than many .
-Nate
Many thanks, Nate…
Great read, and the details abut your father and your relationship with him are interesting and thought provoking.
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for reading, Roger.
The early Vulcans had a piston slap issue- Ford dealers literally had rows of low-mile engines in the back lot that were replaced under warranty with a brand new complete (even had oil in the pan) engines. Later Vulcans were known to break head bolts. We owned a 95 Sable with the 3.8 liter- everything except the engine was replaced under warranty- rack, trans, brake master cylinder… The engine was stripped to the block in-frame and had all new gaskets applied. When we traded the Sable we had to provide copies of all the repair bills, proving major work had been done. Those cars had a lousy reputation. Some dealers flat-out refused to take it on trade. Last Ford car I ever-or will ever- own.
I hadn’t heard about the piston slap issue and had no idea about the high rate of replacement. If only we’d had the internet back in those days. It was pretty hard to find that kind of information back then.
Very surprised about your trials with your Sable. Great to have some more background from someone else who went though Ford trauma.
Thanks for sharing a a big slice of your life as well as your experience with the Aerostar. My run with the Aerostar was actually quite good. But then it had the 4L engine. Somehow I never had a ride with the Vulcan V6.
My COAL on the Aerostar was rerun a few weeks ago.
Somehow I missed your COAl, Wolfgang. I’ll definitely check it out. I’ll be interested to see if our experiences intersected at any point. I sometimes regretted not having the bigger engine, but ours never seemed particularly underpowered. Still, maybe hauling all that weight contributed to the early demise of both engine and transmission.
Beautiful paean to your father, who must have been quite a guy. Father-son relationships can be complicated and I must admit that my father’s virtues became much more apparent to me after I had kids of my own. And, yes, with time, some of his weaknesses manifested themselves in me as well.
As far as minivans go, I never found Aerostars or Astros appealing, as the Chrysler minivans seemed so much more modern and efficient. My one and only dive into the minivan pool was with a Windstar, which was much closer to the Chrysler template in spirit. We got rid of it within three years, before any of the various maladies plaguing the breed bedeviled us. I’m sorry to hear your Aerostar was such a lemon, though I wonder whether some of that could be attributed to undetected damage from the accident.
Thank you, William. I’m sure we’d be harsher critics of our fathers if we’d never had children ourselves. Too bad you learn some lessons too late…
Good decision to ditch the Windstar after three years. I agree that the Chrysler vans were a step ahead. I’m still not sure why I didn’t just do the logical thing and buy one, but then hindsight is always 20/20, as they say.
That’s uppercase-T Truth. The crappiest thing is the poor likelihood of being able to pick up the phone and knock on the door and have good conversations about it once we have that clarity. I didn’t get to.
I fail all the time, but I keep trying, and I am always mindful and grateful to my father for setting an example worth trying to live up to.
Wow, I wonder what that might’ve been like. My mother scornfully mocked whatever and whomever she thought would stir up the most shit, and my father seldom called her out on it, though he wouldn’t ever have said such things himself.
I am glad my father (and one particularly outstanding history teacher I had) did not live to see this what we’re presently living in.
But…but surely you concede the inherent superiority of a vehicle design with a 6-foot-deep dashboard and a deliberately-gargly exhaust note!
Those damn things…I will never understand their popularity. They were penalty boxes with terrible ergonomics, as though designed under harshly-enforced orders to disregard the possibility someone might sit in the driver’s seat for five minutes, let alone five hours, and operate the controls.
That’s no fun, but just think how much worse it could’ve been if the leak had been in one of the front taillights!
(…No, sir. Sorry, sir. Yes, sir. Knocking it off, sir.)
Thanks for another round of great stories.
Agreed that most of the questions that occur to us will never be answered. Would great to have a few hours back just to be able to ask them. Some of them, maybe it’s better not to know.
I appreciate all your comments and observations. Would like to have known your father and your history teacher. Thank goodness we have those examples to cling to, even if they are rare.
Rear taillights redundancy duly noted!
Enjoyed all of your articles I read, especially this one with the personal edition 😉
Thank you, Ann.
YA know “Palamino” steels the show here!! (handsomest ride followed by the “57 Buick”-second handsomest)
Sorry for that typo “steals”.
Trigger was a good old horse…