When I had finally rid myself of the Explodo-Wave, I needed a car to drive right away. I was looking for something that was fun to drive, offered good utility and was cheap to run. After looking at what was available at the time, the decision was easy: Honda Fit!
By the time the Fit made it to our shores in 2007, the car had been available in other markets, as the Honda Jazz, since 2001. After the Wave debacle, reliability was the most important factor in my buying decision. At the time I was car shopping the Fit had been in production for seven years, so I figured it would have good quality. I was proven right when every single circle in the Consumer Reports reliability ratings signified “much better than average,” the best I had ever seen. What Honda was doing with the Fit was pretty obvious–building a high-quality product and producing it for a long time–and thus could afford to use better materials and parts in the Fit and still make a profit.
In 2008, there was still an Eco-Rebate program in Canada that taxed gas-guzzlers and rewarded buyers of fuel efficient cars. This was a leftover from our previous government (which actually cared something about the environment) which was the opposite of the borrow-and-spend government we have now. This narrowed the choice down a lot, basically to the Yaris and the Fit. I drove a Yaris and found it as dull as dishwater. Then I drove the Fit, and just loved it. The main issue was only the manual of the Fit got the rebate, but the clutch and shifter were so good, I didn’t mind. In fact, I wanted a manual and it was the beginning of a love affair. The next problem was finding a DX model, which had been decontented for the Canadian market. The LX, the base model in the USA, cost $2500 more, and I was on a tight budget. After an afternoon of calling around, I found the car I wanted in the color I wanted. The transaction price was $16,000 plus tax, and I received a $1000 rebate because the car had a combined fuel economy rating of 7.5L/100km (31 mpg) or better.
My first impressions of the car were overwhelmingly good. Its fit and finish were impeccable. Anything that really mattered, like the steering wheel, shifter and seats, was made of top grade stuff. The steering on this generation of Fit is–get this–1.8 turns lock-to-lock. You could zip around tight corners with the flick of a wrist. The shifter was simply fantastic, snicking from gear to gear with perfection. The controls were simple and easy to reach. All the switch gear and the instrument panel were truly first class. Even the radio was pretty good. My only qualm involved the thin carpeting, but hey, this is a small and cheap car. You can’t have everything.
The engine…ahhh, that engine. Certainly not a powerhouse, but smooth, and it revved like crazy. At 4200 rpm, the VTEC system would change and it screamed to redline, making all kinds of boy racer sounds. No, it wasn’t really going very fast, but it felt fast, and at the same time returned excellent fuel economy. Although I flogged the living daylights out of that little car, fuel consumption was always the same: 8.0L/100km (29 mpg), an exceptional figure given Vancouver’s horribly clogged traffic. Curiously, it didn’t do much better on the highway. The short gearing and tall profile made the Fit mostly a city car; I got 7.5L/100km (31 mpg) the few times I drove it on the highway.
Where the Fit really excelled was utility. Its Magic Seat system is simply brilliant, and offers many interior configurations. My favorite feature is the completely flat load floor, which was made possible by locating the gasoline tank under the front seat. The Fit was perfect for somone in the process of starting a new business–I could take all the samples I needed with room to spare. Its small size, excellent steering and eager engine combined to make the car a blast to drive on Vancouver’s congested city streets. If you were willing to keep the revs up the car was actually very quick and the handling on a Fit of this generation is really surprising. The little car charges at bends and then screams out with all kinds of VTEC sounds. All very good, budget, fun, exactly what Honda cars are supposed to be about.
At the moment, it is fun to slag Honda for “losing its way,” but the Fit represented what has always been good about Honda cars. For not a lot of money, you can get an extremely well-engineered car that offers exceptional reliability. They are cheap to run and fun to drive. They really cost so little to run, leasing a Civic now costs like $300 a month. That is peanuts for reliable transportation that you won’t have to wrench on for like fifteen years. In my opinion, Honda still has some products that are great deals and all are well designed. In the three years I had my Fit, I changed the oil only five times and rotated the tires just three. That’s it. In addition, there were no warranty issues whatsoever.
There are downsides with any car, and the Fit did have a couple. For one, the handling was like that of a go-kart; It really cornered like crazy, especially after I replaced the poor 14” tires with 15-inchers, the same size as those on the Sport model. With this handling came a rough ride; in the city it was tolerable, but on longer trips it beat me up. Honda has always made its cars as light as possible, which means not adding a lot of sound deadening. Again, not an issue in the city, but on highway trips the car was not exactly quiet.
I loved my Fit, but things change and we have to change along with them. By 2011 my businesses were doing very well. That meant a huge amount of car time, often three to four hours a day. The Fit, while a good all-around car, is not really an all-day car. Mine had a manual transmission, which was okay for short days, but it made spending all day in stop-and-go traffic a pain. The worst part, however, was the hard ride, which combined with the rather confining driving position, caused serious back pain. In addition, I had remarried and now had another child in the brood, which made for tight accommodations in the Fit.
What I wanted to do was find a nice car for me and have my wife keep the Fit. It only had 40,000 km on it and was just out of warranty. Once I’d found my Acura TL and started driving it, we advertised my wife’s car. We had a few bites, but at the end of the day she didn’t like driving the Fit. I wanted to keep it around because it would last 20 years or more and offered such utility. However, I had to respect Annie’s wishes, so the Fit went up for sale–and that’s another story. It took me six weeks to sell the Fit because it was a manual-transmission DX stripper and the people I dealt with mostly wanted an automatic with A/C, which my Fit lacked. What’s more, for many people it isn’t easy to get a used-car loan for that kind of money. New car loans are easy and often times it is not a whole lot more expensive to buy a new Honda because the depreciation is so low.
If there’s one thing I can say about Hondas, it’s that they really do hold their value. I bought the car for $15,000 in 2008 and sold it for $11,000 in 2011. Three years of driving had cost me only $4000 in depreciation–a dirt-cheap $1333 per year. The new owner actually is an old classmate of mine and, in the little over a year he’s had the car, has had to give it nothing more than regular maintenance.
I still miss my Fit; I genuinely enjoyed driving it, and I looked forward to getting in it every time. Looking back, I wish I had not chosen the stripper; the LX would have been much easier live with and to sell. I wish I could have kept it, but there was no way I could justify three cars for two drivers. Thus did a great little car go to someone else who loves it. Were I in need of another urban car, I would still choose a Fit. In fact, my sister has a 2010 Fit–bought on my recommendation–and she loves it!
I see a lot of these with Jazz badges on they seem quite popular here and if they still sport the legendary Honda reliability Ill be seeing them for some time
A friend of mine owns a Fit. I can’t say that I’m a fan.
It just looks so…awkward.
Cheap…but awkward.
Glad that you enjoyed yours though, Len! If I were shopping, I’d want something slightly bigger.
very nice right up, len. i’ve always been curious about the fit and now i really feel like i know it. it’s a little too busy for me but that flat load floor is appealing. i think i would prefer the simplicity of the nissan versa hatchback.
I drove a Versa while shopping for the Fit. Dull as dishwater and the interior materials were not nice at all.
The later Versa hatches received a 1.8 liter with VVT that is actually pretty cheeky. I ended up getting one because there was a three month wait for a manual Fit and the Fit’s lease was $60 more expensive every month.
An unexpected upside to the Versa: Sixth gear is really tall, and places you right in the meat of the engine between 65 and 85 MPH; its a decent highway car. I got 34.5 mpg on a road trip last week.
Another happy Fit owner here. Ours was at the other end of the spectrum – a Fit Sport automatic.
In July 2006 (the summer gas first hit $4/gal in the US) my 94 Club Wagon was in need of a differential. The finance committee (chaired by Mrs. JPC) would not approve the expenditure. The Fit had just been introduced. We found a dealer that had one in stock to drive. We drove the family there and tried it. Our one requirement – all 5 of us could ride somewhere in it, at least in a pinch. My two sons are quite tall (one is 6-6) and they can still ride in the car.
We had to order it. Mrs. JPC insisted on the automatic and tan interior which, for some odd reason, only came with a white car on the Sport model (but not on base). We had to wait for almost 5 months for the car, there was that kind of demand.
The 5 speed auto in the Sport has paddle shifters, so I can do my zing-zing driving that way. Six years later, this is my daily driver now. My only real gripe has been fuel mileage – I have to drive like a 90 year old lady to get 30 mpg all around. We have rarely hit the upper 30s on the highway, as long as the speed is kept down as low as possible. The auto is geared a bit taller than the stick.
I will echo that this is not the best choice for long trips. We have done it, but the seat cushions become a mite unfriendly after awhile. One of my favorite features of the seats is “refresh mode” – the rear seatback reclines maybe 5 degrees, and the front seatback folds flat to make a sort of chaise lounge. We have used this on trips, one driving, one relaxing. I understand that this feature was deleted from the Gen2 Fit.
I have had one warranty claim. One day I noticed a noise. It sounded like a wooden ball rolling in the channel under the windshield when you turned left or right. The dealer had the car for 4 or 5 days, provided a rental, had the dash out and the car very disassembled, and was dealing with engineering about how to go farther. Then they found the walnut that some squirrel had managed to stash in there. Nobody can figure out how, but I have 2 walnut trees in my yard and a lot of squirrels running around. The service manager said he was embarrassed it took that long to find, and did not charge me one cent for the service or the car rental.
Actually, make that two warranty claims – this one was a real one. The teeny tiny battery that Honda puts in these originally lasted short of 3 years and was replaced for free with no questions. I have nothing but good to say about Honda warranty service.
I enjoyed reading about your Fit, Len.
My wife and I married in 1988, and soon purchased a new ’89 Civic DX three-door hatch (mid-level trim at that time) after her Buick Century got partially crushed when a large rotten oak tree branch fell on it in the wee hours one morning.
The next year, we bought a stripper ’90 Civic hatch (no radio, no a/c – I told the dealer to back it off the truck and immediately call me – it still had cosmolene on the wheels when I took delivery).
We ended up selling the DX after about a year-and-a-half (baby coming, and we planned on my wife staying at home), but kept the stripper until our two sons literally couldn’t fit in the back seats any more, with about 160K miles on it. We did end up adding tunes and cold air after a year or two when our budget permitted. My youngest brother subsequently bought it, and despite rear-ending an Expedition and cobbling the front end back together, he took it to about 220K miles and sold it again to kids that wanted to hop it up and go racing.
Our car was built during what I consider to be Honda’s “golden years,” and a big part of what helped build their reputation. It was reliable as an anvil, got 40+ mpg on the highway (high 30s in Atlanta traffic), and had high utility with the fold-down rear seat – plus we had a hitch on it for our small utility trailer. Other than the difficulty of wrestling car seats in and out of a two-door vehicle, it suited our needs perfectly.
A coworker bought a Fit last year, and it looks to be about the closest in Honda’s current lineup to the design philosophy of our old Civic. I personally am not a fan of the high box look, but it does appear to have more utility than our old Civic, so there’s that.
Thanks for sharing your story, Len!
Thanks for the story, Len. I preferred hearing about your open-road adventures in the TL, only because I get my share of annoying city driving every week. 🙂
Also, I happen to have put the exact same alloys on my own boxmobile. It’s funny that you went from 14s to 15s. I came down from ridiculous stock 17s to 16s to get a little more sidewall between my tail and our local wagon ruts.
In my case, I wanted a larger footprint without changing the speedometer. This meant the Sport tires, 195/55-15, which have the same rolling circumference as the stock tires. The increase in grip was amazing and the ride only slightly worse.
Hey, there’s a Jazz in that exact color in the parking lot in front of my house!
Anyway, I like the picture with the fit behind the Ford Super Duty. Man, that thing’s big! Around here it’ll be as big as a medium-sized truck! Which is, essentially, what they are. But it’s crazy that people would use that behemoth as a personal vehicle. Only in America.
I never checked how many turns from wheel lock to lock. It came with 16’s. In Texas, I had to have AC. Otherwise you can substitute Cube for Fit and you are writing about my car. It does get noisy on the freeway. We bought it as a demo and I don’t think the tires on the back were new. We had to change them at about 20k. At 53k our front ones are still the original and the back ones are showing no signs of wear.
I have gotten less than 30mpg on only one tank of gas (29+) and the highest was 35. Almost always at about 32. Went to synthetic oil last change and it seems to do even a little better and run smoother. Probably only in my mind.
I don’t know how long it will last but I feel the same way when the fanbois badmouth the versa or cube as you probably do if you hear someone badmouthing yours. Hope it lasts for 300k and think it probably will. I’m not sure what makes some people talk down to others but had it happen over on the other site last week. It really does take all kinds you know.
Excellent story (as always).
The Cube is a great car but not really the same as a Fit. The Fit as a “beat me, whip me, flog me, make me beg” personality that urges you to fling it at every corner it encounters, as well as to redline it at every opportunity. I likened it to an automotive version of a “yapping terrier.” Truth be told, the Cube is probably a better daily driver as it is less frenetic and rides more smoothly. In fact, the next generation Fit was toned down quite a bit.
I had a Cube rental a while back. Cool car. Totally different driving experience to that of a Fit.
Whaddya mean, “I live in Texas and have to have A/C”? Pussy. I can remember driving to an early appointment in Dallas one August morning in my Fiat 128. The DJ on the radio mentioned that it was 8:05 am and 108 degrees (42 deg C), and he said it without any sense of disbelief! Don’t ask where I moved to not long thereafter, it wasn’t much better.
Here in Houston it’s the humidity Kevin. I had a minor electrical surge last year that took out the speedometer and the AC clutch in my truck. Got a tach but still haven’t fixed the AC clutch. Haven’t needed to.
Otoh, the wife goes in the car and it had to have an AC, so you’re at least partially right. Btw, Dallas is usually hotter than Houston. Also to be repeatedly redundant, Dallas is also dryer.
Obviously, the Fit has a number of similarities to my Xb, especially the part about not making a good long-distance driver. The Fit’s Magic Seats have the Xb beat hands-down in that department. I happen to like the boxy look, but that’s subjective. Speaking of looks, I like the first gen Fit much better than the current one, which has gotten rather blobby.
Fits are very hard to come by used, as folks buy them to keep for the long haul, generally. I stumbled into my Xb, and that was part of the reason I bought it. But I’d probably have been very happy with one too (maybe more so).
I acquired our daughter’s 09 Fit. Driving mostly 14 mile trips, I get 41 mpg in the summer and 37 in the winter. Mechanically everything about the car is perfection, with the exception of the now dated 5 speed automatic. I wonder how good this car could actually be with the addition of more sound suppression material and interior upgrades.
Good write-up Len. I had the “opportunity” to take a trip of several hours yesterday in a Corolla stripper model. My back still hurts. The road noise was awful, the ride was terrible. It made me really wish I were in a Crown Vic or Roadmaster. Even the my 80’s diesel Suburban with a bench seat is quieter and smoother riding! On top of that, I was driving the Lexus ES250 featured here in the past, (a friend owns it now) a few days ago and I had the same thoughts. I guess the ride and seating on my old Volvo 250 have spoiled me a bit. It seems I just can’t really like Japanese cars. They all feel as if they are made of tin foil and AstroTurf. But the value is almost worth it. I think I would have got the same thing if I were you, in your situation. But I think I would have disliked it more latter on.
It all depends now much money you want to spend, Micheal. Obviously, a Roadmaster retailed for a lot more dough when new than a Corolla. Also, in my opinion, many of my southern neighbours tend to be of rather large girth and therefore need larger cars.
And what does a new Corolla retail at? A stripper Corolla retails at $17k taxes in, on the road. Cheap for a new car. Really, you can’t compare a Corolla with anything you have mentioned.
I don’t quite get the tinfoil and AstroTurf thing. My Fit was a very solid and safe car, equipped with ABS and six airbags to boot. I also find my TL very solid.
How dare you sir! My Subaru is made from the highest quality tin foil!
Yup, for sure, Japanese cars are just a flash in the pan. When you peel back the cardboard door panels, you’ll see the flattened beer cans. No way they’ll ever last in the American market. One the fad is over, everyone will go back to the Big Three for sure, so there is not need for Detroit to change a thing.
I had a 1986 Nissan 300ZX and found my quarter panel was made of a sheet of uncut tomato cans.
It has been quite awhile since Honda could rely on Consumer Reports reliability ratings to sell cars. Most other manufactureres closed the gap long ago. For some reason, Toyota and Honda get the bulk of the press when the other Japanese brands are/were equally deserving. And now the American brands are there as well. Perhaps CR should consider altering their methodology…there are so many full dark circles these days.
(On another note, there is a CC of sorts in todays NY Times on the Dodge Dart, on the eve of the 2013 re-launch of that name.)
Some American brands are there. Actually, one is.
I agree, in the past, Honda and Toyota had the game all to themselves. The pricing of their cars reflected it, too. Now, in real terms, they are much cheaper.
There’s no doubt the Japanese have to compete like never before. If you were to compare something like a 1992 Accord EX-R to a Lumina or pretty much anything else in its competitive set, the superiority of the Accord would be immediately obvious.
Now if you compare mainstream high volume models from Japan, Detroit, and Korea the differences in the stuff you can see are much smaller, and if anything, the Japanese models now lag in things like perceived quality of trim and interior plastics. How the stuff you can’t see will hold up in the long haul is an open question, but most modern cars are pretty decent these days – nobody is making a Chev Citation or a Hyundai Pony anymore.
I really like the idea of the Fit. As others have posted, it is about the only current Honda product that seems to fit in with their old design philosophies. I don’t much care for the current Chinese made Canadian market Fit though. I had a look at a Chinese built Fit at our local car show this Spring. I wasn’t expecting much of the first Chinese produced car to hit our market, so there may be some confirmation bias here, but I was seriously underwhelmed. The interior trim was cheap and flimsy looking, the body felt cheap and tinny, and one of the welds on the door frame looked like a solid step down from what I would expect on an early ’80s K-Car. It will be interesting to see if these new Fits hold up the way Len’s car did. I certainly didn’t get the same impression of quality and attention to detail that I got from Honda products from 10 – 15 years ago.
This is Curbside Classics, right?
Are you going to do new car reviews next?
The feature today is,”Cars of a lifetime.” It is about the cars the writer has owned. They don’t have to be classics.
timmm: please do me a favor and read this: https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/curbside-classic-defined/
Pictured above: Two cars that hold five people.
And take them to the mall!
For the life of me, I’ll never understand the rear ‘Magic Seat’. It’s not that there’s anything wrong with it. Quite the contrary, it’s brilliant, but it’s always Honda that designs and engineers it first. They were the first with the folding 3rd row Magic Seat in the Odyssey (which everyone else eventually copied in their minivans) and, here they are again, the first in the small car class with the Magic Seat. Honda really understands the small car market and knew the kind of reward they’d receive for the R&D to get that feature.
The only thing that puts me off on the Fit is its appearance. It’s just too ungainly for me (the C-pillar is the worst). Otherwise, it’s easy to see why the Fit was the class leader when introduced (and still is today).
I look at this today and think how small it is and then I check the specs of my 81 Accord 4 door.
Accord
Wheelbase 2,380 mm (94 in) sedan
Length 4,450 mm (175 in) sedan
Width 1,620 mm (64 in) sedan
Height 1,360 mm (54 in) sedan
Curb weight 945 kg (2,083 lb)
1st Gen Jazz
Wheelbase 2,450 mm (96.5 in)
Length 3,845 mm (151.4 in)
157.4 in (4,000 mm) (U.S. & Canada)
Width 1,675 mm (65.9 in)
Height 1,525 mm (60.0 in)
Curb weight 1,084 kg (2,390 lb) for 1.4 L LS with manual transmission
Other than length, the Fit is bigger.
I’m not that big a fan of modern Hondas, but the Fit/Jazz (as it is here) actually appeals. They look like funky, zippy and sporty little things, and that back seat trick would come in handy (as long as the side doors were big enough and opened wide enough for whatever random things I wanted to carry back there!). They’re probably the only vehicle Honda currently make that reminds me of who they used to be.
We have a ’96 civic 4-door with 5 speed manual and no A/C. (We should have gotten A/C!) This car is one of the best I’ve every owned and we’ll keep it forever if possible.
Anyway, we get 7L/100km in city driving (it’s 10 minutes to work, so the car is started/stopped a lot) and 6L/100KM on the highway on some occasions. I’ve seen 5.8L/100 once.
So what is wrong with the Fit that it gets worse mileage? It just seems wrong. And our Civic feels quite big inside- easily room for 4 adults but I’ve never tried five.
nice car, simple is beautiful.