For those actually paying attention, the main reason I got rid of my 500 Interceptor was the high costs of keeping the thing on the road. I still loved sport riding, something which neither the XJ750 nor the Seca did particularly well. For this reason, for my next bike, I chose a 1990 Yahama RZ350. And what name did I give it? “Hell on Wheels.”
Quite simply, the RZ350 was the wildest bike I ever rode. The combination of light weight and lots of power made the RZ a total blast. Perhaps I should qualify “lots of power.” I have ridden a lot of motorcycles in my life and whenever I am on a big bore bike like an 1100 cc bike, all I can think is, “This is a waste of money. I can’t possibly use this kind of power.” Sure, I’ve heard the argument, “Well, traveling two up in the mountains, you need that power.” Well, I never did; every mid-sized bike I had was more than powerful enough.
The RZ350 was completely redesigned for 1989. There was a new engine and chassis and in many ways it was the swansong of the two-stroke bike in North America. I found mine in the same store where I had bought my Seca 650 just two months before. The RZ had been bought new for $3995 plus freight and taxes and ridden a grand total of 3000 km. Its inexperienced owner was afraid it and rightfully so; this was not a bike for beginners. In fact, with all of 3000 km the rear brake was worn out, telling a lot about his riding ability. The store took the Seca in trade for what I paid for it, and the difference, including taxes, was $1500. A fair deal in my opinion.
The RZ350 was an amazing machine. The Yamaha Power Valve System varies port height to give much better low end torque. On the opposite end, at 7000 rpm the motor screamed like a banshee and ripped to the 10,000 rpm redline. This was accompanied by vibration that blurred the mirrors, clouds of blue smoke and wheelies. The handling on twisty roads was breath-taking; the bike was so light that insane cornering speeds were possible. Herein lies the bad part: this bike could bite you in the behind faster than any bike I have ever ridden. As an experienced rider it was not a problem for me, but for one with less than say, five years’ experience, the RZ350 was best passed up.
Another great thing about the RZ was it was actually easy to live with. The riding position/bar/peg relationship was not radical (by today’s standards) at all. You could ride it for an hour and half or so without heading to the chiropractor. It was not, however, a long distance bike; it was just too highly strung for long distance work, and this resulted in the purchase of a touring bike, the subject of next week’s BOAL.
The RZ350 was an excellent daily rider. I kept it for three years, unheard of for me. Had I not relocated out of the country I would have kept it forever. It was fast and loads of fun. The best part was it was not expensive to operate. The only thing I ever had done in a shop was an annual carb sync which ran all of $50. The tires were not huge, so not too expensive, and since the bike was light, they wore pretty well. The best part was here in British Columbia, bikes under 400 cc qualify for cheap insurance. Even though the thing was as fast as the wind, it insured for like $250 a year. Go figure.
I recently started looking for an RZ350 and found, much to my surprise, clean examples go for $5000 and up. The only one I would consider buying was $7000. I assume this is because so many were raced and generally had the bark beat off them, there just aren’t many left. Sad, really, since the RZ350 was an excellent long term bike to own. In fact, I loved it so much, in winter it was stored in my living room as an art piece!
A friend of mine had a couple of Yamaha two-strokes back in the late ’80’s-early ’90’s – an RZ350 and an RD350. I rode on the RZ several times as a passenger and it was a great bike. He didn’t ride the RD quite as much – he thought it was too wild, but he really liked the RZ.
The RD didn’t have the power valve so the effect of the motor going on the pipe was much more pronounced than the RZ. The RD’s frame wasn’t nearly as stout as the RZ, either. The really cool think about the RZ is the YPVS allowed easy riding in traffic while maintaining the insane top end experience.
There’s an entire generation of English motorcycle riders who worship at the altar of The Elsie (in England it was called the RD350LC – liquid cooling). I still consider it the most magnificent product Yamaha has ever come out with. And I’m not at all surprised what they go for today. Still, compared to a Suzuki RG500 Gamma, they’re cheap.
I knew there would be one of the RD/RZs involved at some point! What a bike this was. Considerably more manageable than the RD, but with the same crazy top-end power. Of course, in every other aspect, viz fairing, brakes, frame, grip, electricals, this has the RD beat. One of my dream bikes, and two-stroke nirvana. As a two-stroke fan who eternally wonders what could’ve been, this bike comes close to perfection. Triple-A performance with daily reliability and cheap maintenance, totally unlike the expensive 4-crack-pots of today. Thanks for enabling me to live vicariously through you. Now to go fire up that Jawa 250 of mine again…
Yes, the RZ350 was close to perfection. The little exception to this was the huge clouds of blue smoke that it created when gunned. This was the reason it is not longer with us. Really, in the long run, a good thing, too.
Er, no. With metered synthetic oil and direct fuel injection, a two stroke is no more polluting than your average four. However, a crappy carburetted stroker has that blue smoke, while a 4str does not. That’s why the latter were initially preferred. Of course, now the 4str all have fuel injection, as well as the added weight, cost, and complication of the inefficient four-stroke tech, which has to be compensated for by huge engines, and thus we have the worst of both worlds. Now there *are* no more two strokes to benefit from injection. The loss of East Germany also had a role to play in this, due to the loss of Japanese companies’ main competitors—state-owned Jawa-CZ and MZ.
Wow, those were awesome motorcycles. In Spain they were nicknamed “la viuda negra” (black widow) because the power and the lightness in hands of unexperienced users, resulted in a lot of casualties.
What makes me wonder is why there are no more intermediate motorcycles. I’m currently riding a Honda CBF 250 (which is quite crappy for being a Honda) and I’m too afraid to step up, as the next step is a 600cc motorcycle…
> currently riding a Honda CBF 250
Would this be the new 250 single CBF 250? If so, it is crappy for sure. I was going to buy one, but wisely took a test ride first. Did you try the Ninja 250? Much better bike for the money, but unfortunately is twice as expensive here so I cannot buy it.
He would be referring to the European model CBF250, which is a very popular bike in Europe and quite different than the CBR250 in Canada.
Really, we should be happy that there are cheap, small displacement bike around. For a long time there weren’t any.
Both of them have the same single cylinder 22hp engine. Main difference is the fairing that makes the CBfakeR more expensive. CBF at least doesn’t pretend to be a `sports’ commuter bike. I asked on the off chance he had the inline-4 ex-JDM rocket, and thought that was crappy:)
Here in the land of the free (sacred) cows, there are a gazillion small-displacement commuter bikes, but with grand sporting pretensions. Not quite cheap, but gutless nonetheless. The CBR250 is at the top of the domestic `sport’ bike food chain, considered a `large’ displacement bike. The only other bikes in that category are the Royal Enfields, which are hardly what anyone would call sport bikes, though very competent tourers.
Yes… it’s the single-cilinder, gutless although good for the city Honda CBF 250… Crappy gearchange (if you compare to the previous CB250), vibrating like mad over 90 km/h… Grrr… But I bought it for peanuts and it’s really cheap to maintain – besides useful for commuting to work in Barcelona
Hey, want speed? Buy a bigger bike. Spend way more money. Big bore bikes cost a freaking fortune to run.
Yes – but a bigger one would be welcome and my only “complain” is that there isn’t anything between 250 and 600cc right now… Something like a Suzuki GS500 (not sold anymore here) offers the increased performance and moderate increase in costs that I would expect… Even the RD350 could be a great improvement over the one I have (I rode one once) – but good luck finding a used one that has been properly maintained.
In America, the problem is that when the manufacturers bring out a small bike, it doesn’t sell. 600cc sportbikes are consider ‘girl’s bikes’ (yeah, with 125+ horsepower), and I’ve watched beginners coming in to our shop bypass the CBR600RR and R6 for the CBR1000RR and R1 – because they didn’t want to be seen as wimps.
Meanwhile, the only 600cc race rep I ever owned (1997 ZX-6R) had me terrified with too much power (slightly more than my ’95 Triumph 900 Trident), disgusted with the lack of bottom end and too much shifting. After custom streetfightering it, I sold it to buy a Triumph Speed Triple.
And yet, one of the most fun bikes I ever owned was a Yamaha SRX250 – dual port single with a dual throat carburetor that seemed to grow a second cylinder at 5000rpm. Should have never traded it in on the Ninja.
I thought the dying gasp for yamaha 2 strokes was the Yamaha RD400. Glad to see this story and find they didn’t quit as quickly as I thought. Did this bike make it to the states?
You guys are lucky that California and Congress do not lead the way on what you get to buy. The RZ (according to wiki) was only sold here in 84-85. I knew I heard of it but couldn’t place it. They are supposed to be really expensive here because their use by Kenny Roberts makes them real collectors items.
Yes, in relatively small numbers. The cult of the 600-class four cylinder four stroke had already taken over. The squids bought the 600’s. They guys that knew how to ride and could appreciate the skill bought the RZ.
i got a 1986 rz 350 i payed 500 for it the bike was on perfect shape dont think i will ever get rid of it
The venerable RZ was produced right up til ’92 I think ?
That’s almost a 10 year production cycle for a road going two stroke with minimal design improvements. That is testament to the design and execution of this, “little” smoker.
Try to find one now that won’t take 10k to make it reliable.
Original owner of a 1984 KR Yamaha RZ350
I’ve had three RZ350, KR, and built them to the hilt for racing. I still have the last one which I’ve tamed down, and restored to a road bike. I bought my first one in 89 after graduating from college, this was an upgrade from the 77 RD400 I had in school as a commuter..wink. I was going to school in Bellingham WA, and used to go to BC and check out all the cool strokers we could never get. I just can’t get enough two strokes in my life…still at age 50! I learned enough about them that I started modifing them for friends and VMJC folks, and have tried to get a side business going. Problem is everybody wants to double the power…but not pay for it! I’ll tell them what it takes and they all just Crap a brick and say “oh man that’s expensive…yeah..my time not’s free, and 30 years of experience ain’t cheap. As far as the smoke…it keeps people from tailgating :).
I have owned an ’81 RD350 and two RZ’s. I bought an ’83 a few years ago and it is all original except for the pipes, fork brace. I’d forgotten how great they handle especially now with better tires. It’s a near perfect machine and I think I will take this one to the grave. 30,000km, never been apart or raced and still starts first or second kick. The twisted are where it really shines and you will leave your friends behind as the little beast eats up the road effortlessly. Steering dampener and fork brace greatly help the handling. Also a great investment as they continue to go up in value. The only machine that rivals the fun factor is my 911 Drop top turbo!!
I paid two grand for it. Was it two much were the hell side stand wireing plug it to the harness