When I saw the new 2005 Ford Mustang, I thought this was the best looking Mustang since the late 1960s. I had owned a ’66 Mustang and as I reported, I wasn’t that impressed by it. When I was in the eighth grade, a young guy who lived across the street from us owned a new 1969 Mach One. I WAS impressed by that beautiful red fastback. The ’65-’66 fastback, most famed for its use as the basis for the Shelby 350 Mustang, was also a design that I admired. However, I was never a Mustang guy through the ’70s all the way into the 2000s, and these vintage models had gotten more expensive with every passing year. I had given up on the idea of ever owning one. That is until Ford brought out a retro design that paid homage to the ’60s in a most appealing way.
Now, the base coupe was a fastback that resembled the ’65-’66 models. No more notch-back coupe. The front end was similar to the ’69-’70 models. The sides recalled the ’65-’66 cars with an indented side cove, although the fender line lacked the earlier car’s kick-up. Somehow this pastiche of vintage design cues took on a life of its own. In my eyes it was beautiful, and even better, it was affordable. Now everybody could have a fastback!
Later in 2007, my F150 was joined by a new Ford Mustang.
The base coupe was equipped with a 200 hp. V6. Teamed up with a five speed automatic transmission it provided more than adequate power with good fuel economy. On long freeway trips, I would consistently get over 25 mpg. at a steady cruising speed of 70 mph. I was often rewarded with 27-28 mpg.
The car is bigger than it looks. It has much more interior space than the old SN95. I know, because I have owned a ’96 Mustang for over 13 years! The rear seat is much wider with more legroom. The trunk is also bigger than the older design, and the split folding rear seat gives it a lot of utility for carrying cargo.
Our particular car is a V6 coupe with the Pony package. This consists of grille-mounted fog lamps, 17 inch Torque Thrust style, “Bullitt” wheels, and a low profile deck wing. It also came with leather front seating, and a six disc, in-dash CD with and equalizer and amp. ABS was an option that year on V6 cars, and ours has it.
It is a dark metallic gray, dubbed “Alloy” by Ford, and the car is often mistaken for a GT. This results in a lot of revs being thrown our way by kids in their own “hot” cars!
Even with the optional Pony package that includes leather seating up front, the interior did not exude a luxurious appearance. The door panels are made up of textured, molded plastic. The dash is just an expanse of black plastic. The design however, is attractive and does resemble the classic dashboard designs of the mid-60s. I have seen different color combinations and simulated aluminum trim used in other Mustangs of this vintage. Most likely these are Deluxe models. I found the ergonomics of the interior to be very good and have spent many high-mileage days behind the wheel.
The interior is a bit noisy since road noise does intrude into the cabin. I found that there wasn’t any sound deadening in the trunk or spare tire well. I haven’t looked inside the doors, but I’ll bet that there isn’t much, if any there. The suspension also transmits noise from the tires on rough pavement, though wind noise is low.
After driving a Cadillac Seville and Chrysler Town and Country, I probably was a bit spoiled. I initially wrote the car off as just being a cheaply built vehicle -Ford indeed knows how to squeeze a nickel out of their builds!
It wouldn’t hurt to add some sound deadening like DynaMat to the cabin and trunk to improve the quietness of the cabin. The original Z-rated Pirelli tires were also much quieter than the cheaper Falkans that I replaced them with.
Over time, I came to appreciate the basic honesty of the car. My F150 is even more Spartan than the Mustang, but I quickly came to appreciate and respect that truck. The Mustang is well built, with great body fit and smooth lustrous paint. I think that these V6 Mustangs are overlooked by many people who would enjoy a responsive, fun to drive, economical, and good looking GT car. You can also avoid any insurance surcharges that you’d get with a V8.
A lot of times our attitude towards a car is based upon our first experiences with it. If it is a pleasant or memorable bonding period, then the car will be remembered in a more positive light. Shortly after I bought the Mustang, I used it to take my son and his friend down to their respective college campuses. We dropped his buddy off at his school south of LA first. Then we continued back to Ventura, where my son was attending college.
This was a trip of over 700 miles; we had left early in the morning, and I was going to make the drive back by myself. It was a beautiful full moon-lit night on US 101, which is my favorite highway. Traffic was light, and I varied my speeds from 70 to over 90 mph. The Mustang handled very securely and the large headlights did a great job of lighting the roadway. The car is very comfortable and relaxing to drive, with plenty of power. This was one of the most enjoyable and memorable night drives that I have ever made.
We had put over 150,000 miles on this car, while it served as one of our family cars from 2007 to 2020. These earlier model V6 cars come with a single exhaust system which is quiet and unobtrusive. Many owners will add an aftermarket dual exhaust system. It’s usually loud and has an unpleasant exhaust note, at least to me. This was also my wife’s everyday car; it helped that it had a Shelby-style window in the C pillar, which eliminates a potential blind spot. The leather on the seats has held up well over time.
We have taken many family trips in this car, with my two teenage kids in the back. However, it works out better as a couple’s machine.
Before we gave it to our daughter, I did a bit of work to keep it in good shape. I replaced all the belts and hoses, changed the fluids, the thermostat and housing, coils, plugs, and wires. I also had the fuel filter and fuel pump replaced preemptively. A year into her ownership, the transmission needed to be rebuilt, as well as having the harmonic damper replaced. It also recently received a new battery. My daughter says that she wants to keep the Mustang, and has no intention of buying a newer car.
After all these years it still looks and runs pretty good, though it’s picked up some dents and dings. Mileage is now over 170,000 miles and it hasn’t given us too much trouble over our long ownership. I told my daughter that if she does decide to trade it in on another car, I get the right of first refusal, and I’ll match whatever the dealer might offer.
I really wouldn’t mind getting it back.
Loved this, Jose. This generation is aesthetically perfect, inside and out, and I’m glad to read about how even the base V6 model provides a great balance of performance, economy, and usability. The only downside would be for a in a Midwestern climate like the one I live in and these being RWD. I want one all over again…
My wife’s car is a 2012 Mustang that she daily drives year round. At the beginning of November, I swap to a set of steel rims and Michelin X-Ice winter tires. It’s the best car I’ve ever driven in snow – the tires make all the difference.
Aaron, I’m glad such technology exists! Until reading this, I had always taken it as a foregone conclusion that any RWD car would automatically be out where I live.
I thought these were a lot better in snow than the Fox and SN95 cars, which I chalk up to the extra weight and better balance in this chassis.
You all know me… you know what I drive… Ok, maybe paraphrasing Quint from JAWS wasn’t the best start here…. Let’s see…
My name is Molly, and I approve of this COAL (see my avatar pic below)… wait, that sounds political, and we don’t do that here…
So many good points here Jose, and I was excited about you getting to this one. Let me think on a proper reply and I’ll report back. I wanted to be first, but Joe beat me to it!
LOL, I’m sorry. I didn’t meant to be a ruiner. 🤣
That’s ok, Joseph… I just couldn’t resist having a little fun.
And I’m not a fan of posting from my iPad as it really gets confused sometimes with the orientation of photos!
As I type this, I hope that by doing it on a PC, Molly won’t end up face down!
Here goes…
Happy dog, happy motoring!
I drove a mirror image of this as a rental car for a week in 09 for a family get together in Denver, although curiously I don’t remember it having the Bullitt wheels but the regular Halibrand style 16” wheels most other V6 Mustangs had, but everything else was clearly pony package.
Personally I prefer the SN95 New Edge era Mustangs but these were undoubtedly better cars in every substantial aspect and the retro styling was one of the best in the industry. I remember being surprised about how well it handled and rode despite the solid axle, other than a few bumps I hit it felt like driving my MN12 Cougar but with less creaks and rattles. My biggest peeve, and a general modern car peeve, are the clunky textured exterior plastics like the side mirrors and rocker panels, and from the inside those giant side mirrors and thick A pillars took some getting used to, visibility wasn’t great
I agree that the 2005 Mustang design is a modern classic.
I also am fond of the Fox bodies, even if they didn’t seem very “Mustang-like”. The first time I saw (and drove) a 1987 LX 5.0, I immediately loved it. It seemed like we finally had some relief from malaise. Then in 1989 I bought a new LX 5.0 notchback 5-speed manual, white with red interior. One of the best cars I have ever owned.
I’m glad to see these cars get some love here. My 2009 is equipped a lot like yours except I have the five speed manual and the aluminum dash. Mine is black with the dark gray leather interior. Incidentally, the Pony Package also includes some suspension upgrades. I ordered mine new and it took a long time for me to really appreciate what a great car it has been because my 2003 Mustang was such a hard act to follow. That one always seemed like it was made with me in particular in mind. Just that feeling some cars have. Anyway the 2009 has been a great car that has been relatively trouble free. I would rate it as one of the top 3 cars I have owned along with the 2003 and my Malibu. I feel like I am going to have fun every time I get behind the wheel no matter where I am going. The only major repairs have been a new clutch at 92000 miles and collision repair due to being t-boned at an intersection Christmas Eve 2010. I do have a very slight rust issue on the passenger side rear wheel arch but plan to get it fixed this spring. It currently has 203000 miles. I plan on keeping it until it or I can’t go anymore.
203K!!! There’s HOPE!!! Thanks Rick. I needed someone make me fell a little less crazy for spending money on my own which is approaching that mark, albeit slowly these days.
The car runs as good as when new and I can’t believe the compliments I get on it, especially it being my daily driver. As you stated in a later post, I replaced the thermostat housing myself a few years ago. Last week I replaced the heater fan, which is an easy job not requiring removal of the heater/AC unit. I did have to replace both front wheel bearings last year , probably from practicing too many Jim Rockford J turns. I take care of it and treat it well, and it sleeps in a garage every night but I am a fan and practitioner of spirited driving. I have done all repairs and upkeep except for the clutch and collision repair myself. I love this car.
I liked these from the moment they hit the streets, and spent many years wondering if I would ever get one. I am still a sucker for the sound and feel of a V8 with a stick, and also really like the convertibles. But one like yours would not be a bad option at all, and makes for a really appealing car.
I always saw a lot of the 67-68 Mustang in these – especially in the dash design.
In December 1983, at the ripe old age of 18, I went to my local Ford dealer to order myself a 1984 Mustang GT. We priced it out and was getting ready to supply the down payment when the salesman said “Son, have you gotten an insurance quote on this car yet?” It had not occurred to me to do so; I responded that I had not. He requested that we delay the order until I had done so….my monthly insurance premium was going to be 75% more than my car payment!. I was heart broken.
In 2016, after the kids were gone and several “life” goals had been attained; I went back to that teenage dream of a Mustang GT. I didn’t like the 2015 restyle as much as the S-197 cars. I wasn’t able to locate a GT with a manual from ’05-09 that hadn’t been ragged out or didn’t have 175k plus miles.
One day, my wife pointed out a local used car dealer had a Deep Impact Blue Mustang GT sitting on their lot with 40k miles on it. I told my wife that there was a 90% chance it was an auto, but I stopped to look at it. It turned out to be a six speed manual.
Because it was a six speed, they were having difficulty selling it. After several hours of negotiations; I walked out the proud owner of a 2013 Mustang GT Premium coupe. I absolutely love this car and will probably die with it.
My insurance on that Mustang GT is actually $57 cheaper per year than my wife’s 2013 Ford Fusion. Amazing what gray hair can do.
Our Mustang is the convertible twin of yours: 07, Pony package, 5 spoke rims (which aren’t on it right now) leather interior but ours it a 5-speed. I agree with everything you said, it would have been nice had the interior been less cheap.
We got it 5 years ago intending to keep it for 1 or 2 years, Mrs DougD thought it was not a great idea but the first time she drove it she said “I LIKE this car” and we’ll keep it a while yet. The only thing it has needed in that time was a clutch.
I was apparently typing my Mini-COAL below when you chimed in. 😉
Hopefully, you won’t have to do your thermostat housing, Doug.
Glad to see you still have yours. Mine still puts a smile on my face every time I take her out for a drive.
Ok, while I couldn’t resist kidding around earlier, here’s a more proper response to this very fine COAL, which is also a nice review of this car. Hopefully, Doug D will chime in on this COAL as well, since he too is the proud owner of a 2007 Mustang.
A few points that are my own exact experiences.
1) Thermostat Housing. Check. I’ve had this repair twice, once at around 96K. and then again at 178,609. This is a common issue with the 4.0L V-6. As a side bonus – Both times it failed, it was just about time for new coolant.
2) My transmission also needed a rebuild at 170+K. It shifts smoother now than when it was new.
3) I haven’t had to replace the harmonic balancer yet, and now I’m scared. I wonder if this is the weird vibration that I feel at exactly 72MPH with around 2,200RPM on the tach in 5th gear…. Hopefully it’s just a tire out of balance.
4) I wish I had the Pony Package, as I really like that grille. My grille is kind of a “Plain Jane”, like a Base Mustang V-6, but my package was called a V-6 Premium. It did come with the leather seating surfaces (more on that below) and a few other niceties, just not the Pony Package suspension upgrades. My Dad’s 2014 was a Pony, and the GT suspension with the lighter engine up front made for a fantastic handling car, despite the live rear axle.
5) Yes, it’s much better as a couple’s machine. Although this back seat is much better than the SN-95 on back to the beginning, it’s still pretty small back there. Our granddaughter, now nearly 20, fit much better back there when she was 10 years old than she does now.
6) Utility: Check! – Fold those rear seats down, and the car swallow up quite a bit.
Anyway, I could go on, but you all are probably sick and tired of me talking about this car. I still love mine after all this time, and will probably keep it for a lot longer*.
I want to write up my own COAL series, but many pictures of my cars are long since lost to time, with only the cars since about 2000 are properly archived due to the advent of digital photography. If I were to start with this one, I came up with a possible angle related to an odometer milestone that I recently reached… One Light Second. My fellow science and science fiction geeks will get what I’m saying. Click the picture below…
* My wife will kill me if I don’t “keep it for a lot longer”.
Only an idiot would spend big bucks to install a brand new leather interior on a car with 184K on the clock, but I love it and plan to keep driving it for pleasure. It is now retired from DD duty or fun in the snow, speaking of which…
point 7) – It was great in the snow, more so than I thought it could me considering the Mustang’s reputation in such conditions.
Must be that “road hugging weight” the newer ones have. 🤣
My new two-tone interior (originally all light grey), and YES, it’s mostly real leather! The guy at the custom interior place I went to showed me how to tell the difference!
Unlike those that complain about interior colors, I love grey interiors. I can tolerate black, I don’t tolerate any other color. As an 80’s teen, it absolutely frosted me that the Japanese never combined a white exterior with gray int. They offered every other color, including the color I don’t mention (starts with r). Having chuntered on, I *love* your two-tone, it should have been an option.
When I had this done, the custom interior guy said that this two-tone grey leather is like that which came on the GT California Special Mustang of this vintage. While I’m not sure of all that, having only seen a GT/CS from the outside, I took his word for it. Since I like keeping a car as “original” as possible, this made me feel a little better, as up to this point, the only aftermarket thing I’d done to the car was give it sequential turn signals, which did not come on the 2007 Mustangs (that started in 2010 with the first restyle of this generation).
Thanks for the compliment. I really like the look, and get lots of compliments on it.
If you scroll back and look at my avatar picture of my dog Molly above, you can see the original light grey that the seats came with from the factory. It also originally came with grey carpeting, but when customized, I had this done in black. The contrast back and forth visually looks really cool (to me anyway), and doesn’t show the dirt and such like the original carpet.
We had exactly the same reaction in 2005 when my wife saw a new lime green one, the best Mustang since the ’67/68. She was 15 when the original ’64 was introduced in April of that year and said she had always wanted a Mustang convertible. I said it’s now or never, we’re not getting any younger. On my advice about not buying newly introduced models she did wait until ’07 when she found the exact one that she wanted and got it. It has the excellent German sohc V6 that scoots but still gets good gas mileage, and brakes and is far safer than a ’67, but has the vintage look. She drives it in good weather only and babies it, it has only 62k miles now.
As you can see ours also has the 17 inch “Bullitt” wheels, we like them as they remind us of the Cragars that were everywhere when we were young’uns. We really liked the original Pirelli P-Zero Nero tires so we replaced them with the same ones about 2k miles ago, they stick like glue. Being a convert there’s a bit of cowl shake and skitter on the worst bumps, expected given the solid axle design, but not nearly as much as older models, anyhow my wife doesn’t notice such things and wouldn’t care if she did. I like the irs on the newer ones but their looks, not so much, they’re attractive and more modern looking, but have lost some of that real retro vintage appearance that appealed so much to us in the first place.
We prefer cloth seats, particularly when the top (still original) is down. We did have to replace the top pump/motor, otherwise not one thing other than brake pads, battery, and tires.
The 4.0 exhaust is tuned somehow to sound much like the 289 and 302 that my Mom’s ’65 and ’69s had, very sporty but not loud. Not like the groaning GM V6s.
Agreed, it’s a great couple’s car! This car is still mint and never driven in rain, much less winter salt. We’ll pass it to one of the kids someday, we hope she’ll be in the same condition she (“Sally”) is in now.
I had a 2013 Mustang V6 coupe I bought used in 2016 and traded away in 2022 for a 2018 Dodge Challenger.
While it was a fun car with 300 HP on tap, it showed typical “Ford Qwalitee” with paint chipping off the hood in big chunks, an automatic transmission leak, and the trim panel on the trunk lid between the taillights falling off twice.
Like you posted it scratched an itch for a 1960s Mustang, but I feel my 2018 Challenger is a bigger, more comfortable car.
Unfortunately I never took any pictures of our car. Even though I bought a ’96 GT, and later an ’06 GT convertible, I still find that the ’07 is just a nice car to drive. Back in ’06 I test drove a used V6 example at the Hertz car sales place, I just got a good feeling from the car, it made me want to go on a road trip! That experience led me to buy the ’07.
No car is perfect, and it’s needed a few things, but if you like a car it’s worth keeping it up. Oddly enough, in some ways I prefer its demeanor to my ’06, it’s just a mellow and friendly car. A lot like my ’96.
If you are looking for more performance the Coyote engined models are pretty competitive with other new muscle cars. Like I stated, I think that these are a good choice for someone looking for an affordable GT car. Take your time and find a good one, coupe or convertible, there are still plenty to choose from. Thanks for all the positive comments. One more car to go in this series.
Not a fan. Ford seemed to keep piling more and more crap on these. Bonnet bulges, scoops, front air dams.’
That was actually a (valid) criticism of the New Edge predecessor to these, which by 2004 was festooned with hood scoops, side scoops and mandatory rear spoiler in GT form. This S197 when it debuted was widely considered refreshingly clean by comparison, no hood scoop, in fact a very plain hood, no side scoops, and a spoiler delete was actually optional. The aftermarket obviously offered every cosmetic accessory under the sun for these, but in factory form these were very clean, the only real mandatory additions a GT got over a V6 was the inboard fog lights and body colored rocker panels. They only really got busier with the 2010 and 2013 updates.
Hi,maybe it’s because I was raised in a “Ford family that I couldn’t resist when I heard a voice call down “do you know anyone who might want to buy a mustang ?”.I had been helping a friend with his car in the shared parking area ‘admiring the satin silver ’05 convertible from a short distance..With further inquiry I learned the car had gotten drenched in the ’03 mega rains here in Norcal and had been sitting for the year.Water had gone through the vent,the cabin filter and wiped out the inside fuse panel/body brain.That happens when the drains get clogged,the rubber doohickies should be removed. (see Utube)
With that fixed I’ve had chance to evaluate what I got,It’s cool!! It has 83k miles on it (yes it was a little old lady)who had it for awhile.The Ford pre-owned widow sticker (15k miles)
says 4.0 v6, conv delux,satin silver clearcoat met.,light graphite cloth,5-speed auto trans.
the exterior sport package gives it the retro looks with the side stripes and spoiler.The Craigar style rims are the best looking in my opinion. Among the various options,air,anti-lock,and traction is the smokers package,is that still legal?
The car has been modified with a dual exaust and after market sterio,and yes it is loud.
I’m glad to hear you long-timers have been happy with your cars as I plan to kick this one around for a while.It will be getting some cleanup,maintenance and maybe a new top.I generally fix up old European classics but like I said-ok I also have a ’65 Tbird I’m slowly restoring- my favorite boulevard cruiser from my youth.Happy motoring!
Ford’s only mistake was letting the bean counters nix the IRS rear suspension. Very capable car for autocross. In the hands of a good driver the later V6 models are very competitive. I have a 2012 Boss 302 and I love to thrash the car at autocross. I prefer the looks of the ’05-’09’s over the refreshed “10-14’s. However that howling Coyote under the hood more then makes up for it. Mine is pretty low mileage as its primer job is track car, the occasional errand or cruise. Probably just over 10,000 miles on it. Only one breakdown, a broken after market suspension piece. Did have to recharge the A/C a couple of years ago. Going to replace the original battery this spring. Maybe a set of headers and some more suspension upgrades. At my age and usage I doubt I’ll see 30,000 on the odometer.
Cool I like it. Reminds me of a patient of mine who likes to race down at Laguna Seca but not in a Mustang.
I too was excited when these came out during the fall of 2005. Enough retro touches with a modern design, certainly an upgrade from the Fox Mustangs.
My brother got a well taken care of 2006 GT convertible last year. It’s been 3-4 decades since I’ve driven an 8 cylinder…my god the power! The rumble! Intoxicating!
Dave M. – If you think that 2006 GT is intoxicating you need to take a 5.0L Coyote out for a run, especially a late model with the 7500 rpm redline.
I had a 2008 Premium GT, 4.6L 5 speed automatic, 300 hp, 6200 rpm redline. Sort of wish I still had it for road trips or cruising around. However I traded in on a 2012 Boss, 444 hp, 7500 rpm redline, 6 speed 3.73 rear axle. No comparison. It sounds magnificent and its a blast to toss it around thru an autocross course.
The S197 was the first Mustang I actually desired to own since the demise of the Fox body (not an SN95-New Edge fan). I do prefer the 2010 update though as it added a few design elements I really like (the rear hips, the cowl hood, the smoothed out wheel flares, etc) and a much better looking interior. I currently own a 2010 GT with the rare Track Pack option so I might be biased.
Never was a fan of the S550 styling or the S650 update (lets be honest..pretty much the same car). The last great Mustang was the S197.