In the Summer of 1979, I was zoom-zooming my Mazda RX-2 around, doing summer jobs while home from college. For whatever unexplained reason, my parents decided that they were done with the family Mustang, and would I like it? Humina, Humina, yup, yup, yup. My sister was also of car driving age, the Mazda had been reliable and still didn’t have too many miles on it, so a grand bargain was reached. I would put together (or oversee the putting together of) a refurbished first generation Mustang, I would then swap it with my parents in exchange for the Fastback, and I would sell the RX-2 to my sister for cash, to fund the Mustang to build out and swap.
Back to our used car, used Lincoln dealer, who located, at wholesale, a 1966 notchback coupe for us. After having it carefully gone through, a straight-six, three-speed, drum brake equipped Mustang notchback was ready for exchange. The grand car swap was ready to be made.
This offered a great opportunity to do a Mustang comparo. I found the six cylinder/three speed combo a more attractive package overall, more smooth low end torque and less shifting, but the drum brakes were awful. The notchback had much better over-the-shoulder rear visibility, and the trunk was larger.
A big difference was in the tires. The Fastback had C78-14 bias-ply tires, essentially 185/80s on very tall sidewalls. The notch was equipped with E70-14 radial tires, more like 205/70s. The difference in response and road manners was huge, attributable partly to the tire size, and partly to the construction. In the future, 70-series radials were the answer.
The car was a bit crude in function, and I knew that going in. But the looks and the overall package made it worth it. After all, driving to work or back to college was mostly all about putting it in a straight line and letting it roll. How much steering feel and dynamic handling does that take? The only somewhat non-negotiable for me was the brakes, and the 4-puck Kelsey-Hayes front disc system was awesome. A little chrome roundel on the brake pedal pad, emblazoned with “DISC BRAKES”, reminded me of that every time I got into the car.
The car had a nice combination of features. 289 V-8 with the four-speed, the “accent package” (chrome strips under the doors and pinstripes), an AM radio, white sidewall tires with “knockoff” wheel covers, and the front discs. The V-8 was only about $100 over the six, and the front discs only another $60 or so. The simple AM radio was another almost $60 (the radio was optional). I think I know where the profit margin lies.
Once I got back to school, the bright red car was a particular source of conversation. Most of the cars there were hand-me-downs or otherwise nothing special. This is where I ran into an unexpected and vexing issue. It began attracting attention of the Midnight Auto Supply sort. Over time, I lost the spark plug wires, the radiator cap, and the battery. I bought a cheap but fitted and lockable car cover, but it still called attention to itself in the outdoor parking lots, as no one else had a car cover. And the locking mechanism was a cable from side to side under the center of the car. The lock prevented the car cover from being stolen (which was not the issue), but still allowed free access to the engine room through the unlocked hood.
Back in 1980, cars and parts that were often stolen were not of the unusual and hard-to-find sort, that could be fenced on the on-line auction sites. Stolen cars and parts were generally of the common but out-of-production type, which were in demand and easy to fence locally by word-of-mouth and the street corner. Older VWs, early 60’s Chevys, and first generation Mustangs were prime targets. Also, I went to school in an L.A. suburb that was directly adjacent to an extremely high crime/high gang/high violence part of town. Auto thefts, locally, were very high, even by So-Cal standards. My car was prime theft material, and was a prominent sitting duck. What to do?
The car’s function was to get me to school and back. But I also considered it irreplaceable. I liked the Fastbacks, but that particular example was the one I cherished, and, if lost, could not ever be replaced.
I pondered the situation, and considered things such as removing the distributor innards, getting a car alarm, or revising a sort of locking hood mechanism. At the end of the day, it would still be vulnerable to vandalism and the theft of small stuff like gas caps and badges. A family in my parents’ neighborhood had a bad experience that sealed the deal for me. They owned a cherry original ‘53 Chevy Bel Air from new, and had it stolen out of the high school parking lot while their son had been driving it to school, as I was away at college with the Mustang. I just couldn’t stand to likely endure something similar with the Mustang. I needed to keep it under lock and key, tucked away, while I was off at school. Thus I had to consider how to become a one-person, two-car family. If I was frugal and careful, I could probably make it work. I always worked summer jobs, and also always worked part-time when school was in session, during both high school and college. I was not wealthy, but always had a bit of jingle in my jeans. Back to the recurring question, what to buy. As you will see, the answer to that question made all the difference, going forward, in unexpected ways.
In the meantime, the Mustang story carries on. I stashed it at my parents’ house, off and on in rented garages and lock-ups, and in my grandmother’s garage for a time. I drove it now and again on weekends, and as a back-up when car #2 was out of commission. The Mustang could carry things like skis or lumber when the back seat was folded down and the trap-door from the trunk was open, so it was used for odd jobs. And, yes, I still own it today. I am much more than a two-car (and a one-person) family today, and the Mustang still holds pride of place in my car barn. I am 61 now, and this car has been in my life since before I was 5. Truly a COAL, for my life.
It’s gorgeous.
Yeah, what a stunner of a ‘Stang. Smart move to never let it go!
What a great looking car with an almost perfect list of options…I haven’t seen too many two-barrel cars with a four-speed.
For every car-person who has written “I wish I had never sold that car”, or “I wish I still had that one car”, there is now Dutch 1960, who never sold that car, and as a result, still has that car.
Kudos to to you Dutch, you’ve done what many of us wish we had done. And yes, your Poppy Red fastback is still an eye-popping beauty.
What a great ending to this installment. I hope we have not read the last about it. A literal Car of a Lifetime.
Your parents must have really enjoyed it to have kept it that long – especially a car without a/c!. My mother loved her 64 Cutlass hardtop, but by 1972 she was concerned about it being way too old to keep any longer, even with only about 60k miles on it. So good for them, they were outliers of their generation. Although the SoCal climate surely helped.
That red paint with the tan/beige interior is an unusual combination for that era. It seems like most of the red early Mustangs I saw were either red or black inside. That combo is ahead of its time.
Actually the interior is white (which gets black carpets and dashboard pad). What you are seeing through the rear window is a new repro fuel tank in its beige box (I detected that visual misdirection after the COAL entry had been posted for publishing). The fuel tanks seem to be a bit notorious for rusting out and splitting seams over time, which is what has happened to this one. That back area, with the rear seat flipped down, is fairly handy. Not station wagon or truck handy, but still occasionally useful for moving something a bit bigger than ordinary.
A wonderful story! Keeping a car for decades is not an easy chore before even counting the theft and vandalism issue you faced. You have true dedication.
Your Mustang is ideally equipped. Kudos to your parents for choosing well.
The storage unit costs, keeping in mind that it lived at my parents’ home, in my grandmother’s garage, and in my own garages and barns for long stretches of time, have come in at about $15k for the duration (So-Cal pricing is high on everything). Long stretches at $75-$100-$120 per month begin to add up, when decades are involved. I completely finished with outside storage rentals about 12 years ago, thank goodness.
Gorgeous car and great read! Keep it up!
When I parked my car at work this past Friday, I saw that one tire was very low. I figured (correctly, as it turned out) that it was ruined from the drive. I carry a full-size spare in addition to the OEM donut, I called AAA, and all was well 90 minutes later. I’d find it beyond infuriating to have a car routinely brought to its knees by parts theft.
When I got my first car, I assumed that I’d drive all my cars until they dropped. Man plans and God laughs. I’m now on my 10th car in 50 years, and the score stands as follows:
4 cars totaled
3 cars sold because they were unreliable or had developed serious problems
1 car traded for another one of the same make and model with a straighter body
1 car traded because it became hard to find parts
1 car traded because I just wanted something different. I’m thinking of doing the same with my current car.
A female teacher at my boarding school bought a new first-generation ’Stang with the 6-cylinder and 4 on the floor. There was much snickering among my friends—why get 4 on the floor and then wimp out with 6 cylinders? In hindsight, I’d think one more gear made sense with limited power. After all, 4 speeds was the default for low-powered imports.
The six with a three speed, as on our family’s other Mustang, was actually a nice combination. One learned to leave it in gear just a bit longer before upshifting, and the wide torque curve accommodated it nicely. The four speed is a “whole lotta”shifting, with a long clutch pedal and a mechanical linkage, not hydraulic, which makes that long clutch pedal less comfortable to use (at least to my left foot).
A six cylinder with a four speed was likely an extraordinarily rare combination. While my experience with the six and the three speed was a good one, the six with the automatic, which was one of my boss’ cars that I occasionally drove, was awful.
Today, of course, every power train would need a separate EPA certification. They’d offer one automatic and (maybe) one stick-shift transmission with the 6.
I’m sure Miss Willison wasn’t thinking in terms of putting together an extraordinarily rare combination.
I wonder whether Miss Willison had seen and been influenced by the “6 and the Single Girl” ad.
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/vintage-ads-and-brochures/vintage-pr-shot-six-and-the-single-girl-camaro-edition/
Wow, Dutch, that’s a fantastic story, I’m impressed with myself when I keep a car for four years, I guess I have lower standards for myself 🙂
I love the fastback early Mustangs and always wonder why they number so relatively few, they add even more style to the basic package which already had so much.
A friend in college my first year had a ’66 Shelby, also in red, a total beast as I recall it and very impressive, and another had a ‘64.5 that his mother bought new, they lived a mile from the plant in the Bay Area. That one was a regular notchback with the 6 and the 3-speed manual. He got it when she went for a first year Miata to replace it, I’m wondering if he still has it, it’s possible I suppose. Another friend has a white ’67, it was her daily in college and still is today, 30 yrs later. Something about Mustangs…
I was reading through the darker paragraphs in fear of what would beset the red Mustang, when I came to “And yes, I still own it today.”
All is well.
What a great story ! .
-Nate
Great writeup, beauty car.
That third last photo is next to a ’73-’74 Dodge Dart Sport that was the same colour as mine, right down to the vinyl roof and beige side molding. Only difference is mine had the full vinyl roof.
Very glad you still have the car!
The Mustang could carry things like skis or lumber when the back seat was folded down and the trap-door from the trunk was open…
I didn’t realize that generation’s Mustang fastback had that door. Very convenient.
I was so happy to read at the end that you still have it. Putting the time frame into context, the fact that it was ’79 – a year that a brand-new Mustang had just been introduced, and that your car was a prime target for thieves and vandals speaks to the timelessness of the early Mustangs. As you yourself wrote, not a bad angle on it. The added utility of the “trap door” (love that) from the trunk to the passenger compartment was icing on the cake. Even though the lack of rear seatbelts is still an issue for me.
Another great writeup.
Great story with a better ending. The fastbacks were the best looking, but the back seats were not the best, even for kids, Having seats for the kids is what made the Mustang practical for most young couples. The fastbacks were always a bit more expensive, starting when they were new, and getting even more so as time passed. I think that they are now the most desirable models, even over the convertible, since they can be built as Shelby replicas. It is very hard to hold onto a car over a long time, especially going through the period as a college student and young adult without secure off street parking. Once you are established with a house, garage and driveway, it becomes much easier, but you have to have the right car.
The first gen Mustang was a hit and has remained popular ever since, with good reason. I had a ’66 and even a ’70 for a time myself, but it took my ’96 convertible to make me hold onto it. So far it’s been about 14 years and it now has a place in my garage. It had developed a massive oil leak from the oil filter adaptor gasket, which I just finished fixing yesterday, after letting it get worse for a couple of years. It takes commitment to hold onto an older car but your Mustang has the appeal of a single family ownership. Glad that you still have it.
She’s an absolute beauty. Proof that a domestic manufacturer can build just as beautiful car as the high-end europeans and at a fraction of the cost. The current generation might have improved in most areas but it still can’t match the sculpted proportions of your original.
The styling, to me, is some sort of “the result being greater than the sum of the parts”. Trying to be objective about it, it is hard for me to reconcile the indented side sweep, versus the roof line, versus the back fenders, yet it all comes together. I wonder if the overall styling of the car somehow hits the “golden ratio”, which would make it intensely pleasing no matter the details. Actually understanding the “golden ratio” eludes me, but when I am shown visual examples of it, I agree that what I am shown is generally interesting and captivating in a way that is difficult for me to quantify.
My guess is that the Cisitalia 202 also adheres to the “golden ratio”. The Porsche 356 may benefit from the “golden ratio” as well.
What a great story. Truly the epitome of a Car Of A Lifetime. And if I’m not mistaken, you’ve had it longer than anyone else has had a car in our COAL series. Adam Simpson got his VW at the age of three, but that was in the late 80s. Did I miss anyone else?
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cars-of-a-lifetime/coal-1959-volkswagen-the-ultimate-car-of-a-lifetime/
Depends how you count the family ownership part, Dutch himself I think is just shy of Tbm3fan’s ’68 Cougar that he’s owned for about fifty-two years now. But with family heritage then obviously the ’65 is older than the ’68.
Dec. 18, 1969 to be exact but notice that both cars have the San Diego connection. The shot below, for any in San Diego back then, shows Cowles Mountain to the east with the big “S” painted on it by SDSU students starting in 1931. I have no idea what is there today.
There is a 1958 video of the S being painted. Every guy in the group has a crew cut.
https://www.cbs8.com/video/news/local/throwback/san-diego-state-students-paint-traditional-s-for-homecoming-on-cowles-mountain-in-1958/509-f870d85b-af3f-42cd-9288-d977ade0a958
Cool!
Because at that time quality was job…ohhhh…22, 23; whatever it took.
Yup. Same system used on ’66-’72 Mopar A-bodies. It worked well, though it was subject to piston rust/seizure, and its fixed calipers meant even the tiniest amount of runout in the rotors could be felt as pedal pulsation. Last time I checked—quite awhile ago, now—stainless pistons could be bought to replace the chromed steel ones, and the calipers could be sleeved in brass or stainless.
I wonder what’s in the $35.83 “visibility group”.
The “visibility group” is a remote adjustable left side mirror, with a chrome lever mounted in the driver’s door, and a “day-night” adjustable rear view mirror. The flat panel twist-knob on the bottom of the mirror has “day” in black lettering on chrome on one side, and “night” in chrome lettering on black on the other. I believe the car has two-speed wipers, and the window sticker says one-speed is standard, so likely throw the two speed wipers into the package as well.
I’m not sure an exterior left side mirror was offered at all as standard. There was a non remote-adjustable version, which could also be added at the dealer if one wasn’t provided (different states may have had different requirements, and you just might be an expert on that). Right hand side non remote-adjustable was also dealer-available, IIRC. As the window sticker does not mention an exterior mirror, it may have not been standard equipment. That little bragging list is a great way to sort options from standard features, and explains why a simple AM radio is over $50 (no radio mentioned as standard equipment).
Yeah, a driver’s sideview mirror was among the equipment that moved off the options list and onto the standard equipment list in a pretty big hurry once the GSA standards took effect for 1966—though it’s difficult to imagine any US Government agency buying many Mustangs. I don’t know for sure, but I’m fairly certain there wasn’t a patchwork of differing state standards for sideview mirrors.
It’s shocking fun to go running option prices through an inflation calculator, eh? About $450 in today’s money for an AM radio.
Probably interior lights as the visibility group.