I guess you could also title this “Same song sung in a different key”. I enjoyed the 1988 300SEL a lot, but who wouldn’t jump at the chance for the same supple and quiet ride, with more power; a lot more power?
The 300SEL had the 3.0 liter version fairly new M103 Mercedes straight six that had arrived with the new W124 in 1985. It had fuel injection, but still just a single cam and 12 valves. It was set up for long life and smooth, quiet operation, and an optimum balance between top end power and torque, making 177 hp if my sources are correct. But with a curb weight of 3400 pounds give or take, it was sufficient in the S-Class, and undoubtedly livelier in a lighter 300E.
The 560 SL, SEL and SEC featured a 5.6 liter SOHC, 16 valve engine good for 238 hp in USA spec. It had a pretty healthy torque curve, peaking at 288 lb.ft, at a pretty modest engine speed, which gave it almost American-style V8 grunt. While the horsepower rating may not sound great now, at the time, it was quite ample with the lower weight of the S-Class of the day. In addition, expectations of the driving public were just generally lower in the post-Malaise years. Remember the 101 hp of my BMW 320i? What would seem laughable today was pretty peppy for the 1980’s.
The 560SEL was good for a top speed of 142 mph, which was excellent at the time. And its 0-60 time of 7.0 seconds and quarter mile time of 15.6 seconds were nothing to sneeze at either. Just put the hammer down hard.
As Paul explained in the comments to the 300SEL article, the six would get up and go if prodded to do so. Mercedes uses a “kick down” switch under the accelerator pedal of most 1960’s to current gasoline, automatic transmission vehicles. The four speed automatic would start in second gear unless the pedal was depressed hard enough to activate the switch. And you have to actually hit that switch to spur aggressive downshifts. Just “flooring it” without depressing the electrical switch doesn’t get you much initial action, like would result in a Cadillac or Lincoln anything. And that, I think, explains why a lot of luxury buyers were put off by Mercedes and BMW experiences in the 1980’s, and swept into the waiting arms of Lexus.
Most Detroit cars of the time, at least, had a very light throttle to simulate oodles of raw power that really didn’t exist. The Mercedes’ by contrast took the opposite bent, with a heavy accelerator that took some pressing down. But the power was still there in reserve when the Americans were out of breath. My 2016 Lexus seems to strike a happy medium; a lighter throttle effort on the drive-by-wire pedal for sure than any Mercedes I have driven, but not touchy and almost devoid of resistance like my grandmother’s 1984 Bonneville. It’s 5.0 liter 4 barrel would chirp the tires at will since the lightly sprung accelerator was basically an on/off switch. But passing at speed on a two lane road? Forget even trying.
In 2003, I stumbled upon the 1986 560SEL (in the featured anthracite grey) at a local buy here, pay here lot, much like this picture. It was really a tire and battery place, but they had a lot of cars on offer too. I passed them from time to time the next town over, and they are still in business though their fare has gravitated to jacked up pickup trucks. But at the time, they frequently had interesting imports. The 560 was on the grass by the road, with “CASH ONLY” on the windshield. That sounded like something right up my alley! Cash only at a BHPH must mean it is distressed in some way.
It had 130,000 miles and upon closer inspection, it was cosmetically very good, too good actually. As you know by now, I like my rescue COALs to run well but need cosmetic elbow grease. It had glossy, deep paint with obvious areas of work and repaint, but still nice. A light grey leather interior that was clean and intact, with burl wood that was dark and glossy, not faded and cracked. Really, it needed nothing cosmetically but a good bath. The owner was friendly and talkative. He bought it from a small local BMW/Mercedes new car dealer (since closed) as a trade-in they didn’t want about four years earlier. He had sold it at the BHPH twice, and repo’ed it both times.
This last time he took it back, though, it had squealing brakes, the heat was barely getting warm, the stereo had been removed, and the antilock brake light was coming on every so often. He had put front pads and rotors on it, but the other problems were more than he wanted to spend. He had been quoted $1000 or more for a replacement ABS unit.
He didn’t want to state a price. “Tell me what you’ll give me cash, as is. Everybody coming in here wants it fixed, or wants me to finance it again”. I offered him $2,500.00 cash and he accepted. That was probably all gravy for him. After selling it twice, with large BHPH down payments and 48 or so monthly, high-interest payments, he had probably made a handsome profit already.
I knew the radio would be a quick and easy fix with Crutchfield. The lack of heat I hoped I could fix myself with a new duovalve (this would be the third Mercedes in a row with that issue). The antilock brake light concerned me, but we all drove cars for years without antilock brakes, right? So if it can’t be fixed cheap, I’ll just drive it as it and put black electrical tape over the angry light. The lights in a neat row lent themselves to this “fix”.
The glovebox held lots of receipts and the stamped maintenance booklet; until the BHPH lot, it appeared to have been a one owner with dealer service by the book up to about 90,000 miles. The new radio from Crutchfield went in without a hitch. The new duovalve, in a stroke of luck, sure enough made the heat nice and toasty. The antilock light came on about every time I drove the car, and usually hitting a bump seemed to trigger it. The brakes seemed to work fine, not that I ever activated the antilock feature for sure. It just always stopped on a dime, pretty as you please.
I had also noticed quite a “roar” at times, around town speeds seemed worse than the highway. And, the noise seemed worse in curves as well.
So, the roar is what I was really trying to track down. From what research I could do online, it appeared worn wheel bearings were a likely culprit. But I also was surprised to find that worn wheel bearings could lead to the ABS light coming on. Seems that the worn bearings cause just enough inappropriate / nonsynchronized movement of the wheel(s), that the ABS sensors think the wheels are not moving at the same speed. Therefore, the sensors (wrongly) think there must be a malfunction of some sort.
I approached my local tire and oil place about the wheel bearings. They were willing to install them; they were the old fashioned, cheap, replaceable kind. Even now, they are only $5 or so per wheel, on Rock Auto! None of these expensive hub assemblies like the new cars today.
The bearings made a night and day difference. The car was silent, for the first time. And the ABS light never came on again! It was the bearings all along.
I drove the 560 for about two years, up to about 160,000 miles. It was in such good mechanical and cosmetic condition that I actually traded it in to a new car franchise dealer for a reasonable sum when the next COAL crossed my path. I don’t recall doing much else to it, aside from a set of Michelin tires. I backed into a tree in a dark driveway, but it left no sign of damage to the bumper. I had my only “blowout” ever in this car, when I hit a piece of someone else’s tailpipe in the road and sliced the passenger rear tire clean open.
The next COAL was a departure for me, but was a fun car, and it stayed in the family with a relative until recently, actually! About a dozen years or so.
Bangor had a prominent attorney named Marshall Stern who had (I’m pretty sure) a 560 SEL. The car looked solid and strong, and had tons of presence. Sadly, he was killed in an accident in the car. It must have been a tremendous impact. https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2457&dat=19950608&id=sq1JAAAAIBAJ&sjid=og4NAAAAIBAJ&pg=3486,1948353
These are still my favorite Mercedes of all time. It is becoming extremely rare to find one in anything resembling good condition unfortunately.
The penultimate Mercedes-Benz? I think so.
Then what is the ultimate M-B? 🙂
I like some of the mid-90s models just a wee bit better, not sure why they just seem a bit sleeker to me. But this one is definitely up there with the best.
Well, if you have to ask…see badge on pic below.
Although my wife would say G-Wagen. I did almost post the exact same response you did then you beat me to it while I was busy making coffee. 🙂
“Then what is the ultimate M-B? ?”
Diesel of course .
-Nate
I literally died reading this comment.
My condolences.
Irregardless of how you died, you might be interested to know that “literally” has actually been used to mean ‘figuratively” for a couple of hundred years.
http://uproxx.com/life/literally-figuratively-merriam-webster-grammar-snob-defeat-peter-sokolowski/
So maybe us grammar snobs need to literally shut up about it. 🙂
Had a years-long argument with a friend who’d an amusing habit of doggedly using malapropisms. It was about the word “irregardless.” I said no such word, she insisted there was, and that it had same meaning as “regardless.”
Finally, we agreed to leave the pub one night, and actually look it up.
I still say the Oxford is wrong.
Kind of like when I was growing up, when ‘inflammable’ and ‘flammable’ were used interchangeably.
Thankfully, the use of the first term has been on the decrease.
Nice COAL, thank you. You make an interesting observation on traditional American car’s power delivery compared to European or Japanese cars.
I wouldn’t say the American cars promise power that isn’t there, they are just tuned to produce torque at low revs.
In the old days before variable valve timing and sophisticated engine controls, high torque at low revs came at the expense of top end power, and vice versa. It was tricky to have both and still meet emissions standards.
Traditional American pushrod engines were intended to be cheap and durable. They lend themselves to high torque at low RPM, which suited the driving style of their buyers just fine. It’s easy to drive such a car, as it pulls away at low speed effortlessly. But it feels odd, if one expects power to build with high revs, as most OHC engines do.
The reverse is also true. I remember the first time I drove an OHC car (’87 Toyota wagon). The soggy bottom end and poor low end torque made the car more difficult to drive than the pushrod engines I was used to, but more rewarding from an enthusiasts perspective.
The sequential fuel injection 3.8 liter V6 that my 1986 Buick Electra T-Type had was quite good for overall performance. It would accelerate to 100 MPH easily.
Those 3.8 sixes come from a family of engines that are considered some of the best ever made. I think it was ward’s that had a top 100 engines of the 20th century, and the 3.8 was in the top 10.
Good point about the engines…..one of my clearest childhood car memories is all the squealing of tires after church. It was all the old ladies (grandma included) leaving in their big V8 American cars that chirped the tires with no provocation. Grandma’s 1984 Bonneville, her BFF’s new Grand Marquis, and another lady’s 1978 Custom Cruiser were the worst offenders. My Great Aunt Ruth had a 1973 Impala with a 400 c.i.d. V8, though she kept it under control. She drove slowly so as to not drop her ashes.
The rare affordable used Mercedes! 🙂
You have such a long streak of good luck! These 560s are one of my favorite MBZ models also. Back in 1969 I had a road test of the older 6.3 models and had been astounded by the performance. Dean Moon put the car on the dyno and found that it was putting out very close to the advertised horsepower, as opposed to the inflated claims from Detroit. 300 hp and 434 pounds feet torque. This was the engine from the 600 limousine. These cars were legendary. These advanced through the SEL 6.9 to your version the SEL 560. I was doing my research into the earlier 6.3 models and found that their parts cost a fortune, even if I could afford the car itself. I thought about a 560 but then decided to buy a two year old Cadillac Seville STS, the performance was equivalent, (I know, it’s FWD) and I just wanted to enjoy the car for a few years without the problems of an older car. My heart still yearns for an 560 SEC coupe. The 6.3 is pictured below.
A 560 is on my bucket list for sure.
The SEL played a perfect part as Roman’s car in The Great Outdoors.
3 years ago I bought All original black exterior and beige leather interior 1979 Mercedes 450SEL 6.9 with 59K original miles and all books and owners manual. Approx just over 7K units these were ever made. Vehicle was in storage feels like new drives new but I had also issues with hydropneumatic suspension and rear differential apart from that Its a beauty! Asking price was 40K I got for 37K
That “kick down” switch really transformed my W140 S420. I also thought that it felt a little sluggish taking off and for passing maneuvers. It took a couple of weeks to discover it, and man what a difference. I loved that thing after finding out that.
Always wanted a 560SEL….closest I got was an 86 420SEL, fridge white with maroon leather. A previous owner had rigged up something in the fuse box with a fuxe that would blow periodically and the a/c compressor would quit working, so I carried spare fuses in the center console. It got 17MPG no matter how I drove it, and liked 93 octane gas, which was a drag.
There truly is nothing like a big-body MB, at least 1960s-early 90s…the newer ones leave me cold and I’m troubled by how rusty newer MB vehicles can get…they figured out galvanizing in the 80s, what the heck happened since?!?