By 1991 I had been driving my ’89 Thunderbird for two years without too much in the way of trouble. I had even convinced my engineering co-op supervisor at the automotive supplier where I worked to get one for himself (despite the fact that his main account was with General Motors). However, as has been true throughout my automotive owning career, I was always up for something new. That “something new” would be about as far away from the Thunderbird as you can probably get, and it would have long-ranging impact on my car-buying habits as well as my parents.
My parents had always bought domestic vehicles: Fords, GMs, and the occasional Chrysler (including a pair of Cordobas in the ‘70s – no rich Corinthian leather for us, though). As I noted in my previous COAL, I had been interested in trying out something Japanese but couldn’t talk anyone into getting the Acura Integra I was considering because the dealers were too far away from Akron. In 1990 I tried to get my parents to consider purchasing this new $35k Japanese luxury sedan that had just been introduced, but no luck there either as that dealer was also too far away. My parents bought a 1990 Lincoln Continental (the Taurus-based one) for that same $35k instead of the Japanese luxury sedan I was pushing, which happened to be the first Lexus LS400. At least I tried…
Come 1991, however, one of my father’s coworkers told him that the local Honda dealer in Akron was offering some great lease deals on new Accords like the one he had just purchased. Knowing that I’d been interested in Japanese vehicles, my father asked if we should go and take a look and I agreed we should. My father had just gotten into leasing with that ’90 Lincoln (which cost over $700 per month in 1990 dollars) so he was open to another lease instead of conventional financing.
In the mid-to-late 80s most Honda dealers weren’t the place to visit if you wanted to get a deal. Hondas had been so popular that many dealers were in “take it or leave it” mode. We were pleasantly surprised to find that the local dealer was pretty helpful and willing to offer some really low lease payments on Accords (in the $250/month range if I recall correctly). It helped that the salesman my father’s coworker recommended was not a career car salesperson but rather a former principal from one of the local school districts who was selling Hondas to amuse himself in retirement.
On the downside, we were getting to the dealer at the end of the Honda promotion and the dealer had set aside only a portion of the inventory for the promotion. Dreams of an Accord EX with sunroof, alloy wheels, and all the goodies went out the window – the only car left was a four-door Accord LX, in refrigerator white. Not exactly optimal, but I was willing to take it for a spin (at least it was a manual transmission car). I was fortunate – my father’s colleague had picked up an Accord DX with black bumpers and mirrors (only driver mirror) and manual windows/locks. The LX was pretty posh in comparison.
Having never driven a Japanese sedan previously, and indeed having never driven any car that was this small, light, and nimble, the driving experience was quite a surprise to me. This generation of Accord still had the double wishbone front suspension that received high praise from the automotive magazines. The greenhouse was expansive and the dashboard quite low so visibility was great. The 5-speed manual transmission was light and precise, a vast change from the stiff and heavy manual transmission in the Thunderbird.
Although the car only had a bit more than half the horsepower of the SC (125 total), it was still quite quick for the day. Given how easily I found myself in trouble with the SC, it was probably just as well. By this time, no Accords came with carburetors (my interest in the top-of-the-line Accords stemmed partly from previous years where they were the only ones that came with fuel injection). The car was assembled very well, too – the salesman made a point of telling us that the trunk didn’t need to be slammed but could gently be pushed shut. I was certainly feeling optimistic about this car, particularly since it was so inexpensive. Better gas mileage would be great, too – I was traveling quite a bit as a co-op student between Akron and Sandusky and that SC wasn’t going to win any economy runs.
The car was available, we liked it, and the price was right – as with many car deals, my father got them to throw in “mats and flaps” as he put it (floormats and mudflaps were things he liked to have). We had to pay extra to add a Honda CD player, but as a music obsessed college student that was a must-buy that my Thunderbird didn’t have. So we took it home and my father took over the SC (which may have been his plan all along).
Luckily for me, I didn’t have much of a “cool guy” image to keep up, so the switch from the SC to the Accord didn’t damage my reputation. Admittedly, I’d have liked alloy wheels instead of the plastic wheelcovers, and white wouldn’t have been my first choice, but I could live with it, especially since it was so fun to drive. Sufficiently fun to drive, in fact, that I got pulled over for speeding on the Ohio Turnpike not long after I got it (of course, two years of doing dumb things in a hot Ford without trouble, but 10 mph over on the Turnpike in a four-wheeled refrigerator and I get nabbed). One warning and some sheepish “yes, officer” discussions later, I was back on my way. (I can still remember which CD I was listening to when I got pulled over – odd what stays with you all these years later).
Other CC’ers have done a superb job of detailing the benefits and quirks of this particular generation of Accord, so I will simply note that this Accord certainly kept up the reputation of being rock-solid-reliable. The only issues that cropped up were some rattles associated with the seatbelts (1991 was the last year for the “mouse” belts – in ’92 driver airbags appeared and the mouse belts were relegated to the history books for Accords). A few trips to the dealer cleared those up, but not without some hassles (rattles are notoriously difficult to fix). I got to spin a few wrenches, too – nothing major, just adding an accessory center console armrest (oddly, the car didn’t come standard with one).
Although the car was reliable, durable, and enjoyable to drive, it wasn’t particularly memorable overall. Other than the aforementioned speeding incident, the car never got me into trouble. It fit in well in the parking lots at the University of Akron and didn’t draw attention to itself so I never had any problems with break-ins. I was much less fussy about the Accord than I was about the Thunderbird – I never let my girlfriend (now wife) drive the Thunderbird at all, but was happy to lend her the Accord when she needed it. It served me well, and came with me when I graduated from the University of Akron, got married, and moved to Maryland. For the first six months we lived here in Maryland it was our only car – it never let us down. (We decided not to bring my wife’s orange ’78 Mercury Zephyr with the 3.3 liter straight six with us – that car was so underpowered as to be frankly terrifying to drive in traffic around here.)
Looking back through my files to prepare this COAL, I realized that it was the only car I ever owned that I never photographed. It doesn’t even appear in the background of any other family photos from the time. The Akron dealer where I bought the car photographed every new car in front of the dealership and gave the new owner a laminated card with the car photo on the front and the car and dealer information (VIN, dealer phone number, warranty expiration, etc.) on the back. I believe I still have the card somewhere, but seven house moves across two states over a quarter-century of time mean that it has eluded my best efforts to find it. Luckily the Curbside Classic family has already found and photographed an example in white that was exactly like mine, save for a red interior instead of my car’s blue one.
I mentioned that this Honda was a “game changer” of sorts for us. It didn’t take long for my parents to begin driving the Accord and preferring it over my mother’s Lincoln or the SC (my mother didn’t drive stick, so she never drove it – “I don’t have three feet for the three pedals” was her response to manual transmissions). The car made such an impression on them that within a year both Ford products were gone and Hondas replaced them. My mother got the Accord EX coupe that I had originally wanted, and my father picked up a Prelude. Once Akron got its own Acura dealer, my parents began buying that brand as well. To the end of their lives, they bought nothing else but Hondas.
As for me, it started me on the Japanese car path, but I did step away from that path several times, sometimes with great results and sometimes with not-so-great results, as the Curbside Classic readership will see soon. When it came time for the Accord to move on (and for me to purchase my first car without any parental assistance), my choice was conventional and, some might say, a step backward…
Well written, thanks. It brings me back to last week’s article on adulting:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-1979-oldsmobile-cutlass-supreme-brougham-adulting-1970s-style/
A 2005 Accord was a game changer for me as well:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cars-of-a-lifetime/coal-2005-honda-accord-and-2002-subaru-forester-the-game-changers/
These Accords were great cars. My brother had a ’90 EX (his 3rd Honda, he’d become a huge brand loyalist). My Pop got a ’91 SE–his first import ever–after an especially dreadful experience with Cadillac. The cars were so well done for their intended mission: conservatively good looking, comfortable, efficient, filled with thoughtful details, beautifully made, fun to drive. There was no one “thing” that stood out–it was the seamless blending of many desirable attributes that made the cars so appealing.
The Accord prompted so many domestic owners to sample an import, and it was so good (in many cases far better than the domestic competitors) that they never went back. I think Oldsmobile in particular bore the brunt of the Accord. People who in earlier years would have bought a Cutlass (which in its prime had also offered a nice blending of attributes without being over the top in any one area–boring to some, but appealing to many others) found happiness in a Honda. By 1990 GM couldn’t compete–the Cutlass, in Calais, Ciera or Supreme guise, were unable to attract demanding customers seeking a slightly upscale product (big market), and the rest is history.
I have to agree on Olds. Had never thought about it but Honda did everything that Ols could have/should have done much better.
A friend had an early Accord. His adjective for it was “Crisp”. That seems to sum up the car well I think.
A cousin drove one like this about 300,000 miles and regrets that she ever got rid of it.
The comparison to Oldsmobile is spot-on. I remember reading in USA Today, in the early 1990s, that the Accord was attracting many Oldsmobile and Buick trade-ins.
I grew up in an Oldsmobile family (Delta 88s), and now I drive Hondas. The market is now even more sub-divided than it was in the early 1990s, so Honda ‘s appeal to suburbia is now led by a combination of the Civic, CR-V and Accord.
I can only guess what song you were listening to when you got the ticket in the Honda…….I can’t drive 55 !!!!!
My first impression upon getting in one of these years ago, was how nice the turn signal switch, controls, etc felt when you used them…Did they actually design that into them to feel as nice as they did?
Marc,
In my experience ALL Hondas were/are like that (nicely weighted controls), at least up through the mid 90s. And my experience with 70s-80 Toyotas and Nissans is that they are “cut from the same cloth”.
Perhaps the only disconcerting control in a Honda is the clutch. The clutch pedal tends to feel TOO LIGHT, like you are pressing on a big soft pillow.
I haven’t visited Curbside Classics in a while. What does COAL stand for?
Car of a Lifetime
Got it. Thanks
Best car I ever owned. If I could buy a new one today I would.
Groundbreaking cars. I live in a city where road salt is heavily used. You simply don’t see many old cars. Yet, you still see Accords from this generation. Not just a reflection of their durability, as any car from that era would typically be scrapped by now. The owners have clearly chosen to take care of them, keeping them on the road. That says a great deal.
I believe that this generation of Accord marked a substantial improvement in Honda’s rust resistance. Unlike some others, Honda learned of the problem and worked on it. Hondas of the mid 90s are some of the least rust-prone cars of their era, at least from the proof in my area.
For decades, all manufacturers have had access to tests that determine the rust resistance and durability of their cars. It’s clear that Toyota and Honda (for example), placed exceptional importance on long term quality and reliability of their cars to draw sales from competitors, and foster long term brand loyalty. It’s a business model choice each manufacturer can make.
The first generation Toyota Matrix for example, is still very plentiful in my city. That’s over a decade of salt baths for months. And many still look only a few years old. You can be sure a significant chunk of those owners will buy Toyotas indefinitely.
All Hondas still have an annoying propensity to rust at the trailing enge of the rear wheel well above the bumber cover. Whether its a Civic, Accord, or Pilot they all rust here. You’d think that after 30 years….since the 2nd gen Accord that they would remedy this.
We had 2nd-gen and 4th-gen Accords in the family and both rusted there and only there. Kind of disheartening to hear that still hasn’t been fixed!
My parents bought a used Honda that was very much like yours in 2000. It was the same refrigerator white, manual transmission, and I forgot what trim level but given the equipment it was almost certainly an LX. It had a grey interior.
Unfortunately their experience wasn’t as good as yours, but it really wasn’t Honda’s fault. The car obviously had not been well taken car of, it was from the south and never garaged so the paint was chalky and dull, it had been bumped into something with all four corners, the interior cleaned up but was scuffed and pieces were missing, and the thermostat and radio didn’t work. Yet the dealer still got the “It’s a Honda” premium for it.
I don’t remember all that went wrong with it, but I remember it needing several sensors, a couple of CV joints, and a cracked radiator that sent it to the shop several times while they owned it. They ended up trading it after only a couple of years on a used and completely base Nissan Sentra.
I drove the car several times. As a Honda from the early 90’s it was a fun car to drive, handled well, and great visibility even though it felt like you were sitting on the pavement. Though given its previous life it wasn’t as tight as other Hondas I’ve been in, and it also had a few annoying rattles. I didn’t really miss it when they got rid of it. They’ve not bought any Honda’s since then, only Nissans and Infinitis until their most recent (and now their only) vehicle which is a Chevy.
I Think Having Manual transmission In These Is The Key.As Most Auto Tansaxles won’t Go Past 150 K Miles Without Rebuilt.
When you say “most auto transaxles won’t go past 150k miles without rebuilt,” do you mean Hondas or auto transaxle equipped cars in general? In either case, where did you get this information? I know some fail at around that mileage (Hondas and others), but I did not know that most fail.
It’s Mostly Based on my personal Experience& People Around me.Maybe For UsMarket They Are Using Better Automatic transmissions Or Americans Are Better At Taking Care Of Their Cars Or Both.But Down Here Cars With Automatic Have Alot Lower Resale Value Mainly Due To Bad Reputation.Also It’s Way More Expensive To Repair Automatic transmission.
I don’t know about the automatics in this generation, but the 6th Generation starting in 1998 had notoriously fragile automatic transmissions. I believe they used the same transmission in the Odyssey minivan where it faired even worse having to pull that extra bulk around.
OH turnpike was pretty notorious for being used to supplement the state budget. I imagine your Ford got a pass where the Honda didn’t due to lingering ‘buy American’ thoughts in the Midwest.
Possibly so – even though the Thunderbird and the Accord were both made in Ohio. I did get some flack when I showed up at my co-op job in the Accord, as the company I worked for only did auto parts for the American companies. I brought up its “made in Ohio” pedigree but that didn’t sway anyone. Live and learn, I guess.
The Turnpike is still pretty notorious for being a bad place to speed – I have successfully (to date) avoided that trap other than the incident here.
I guess every COALer has their Honda Accord moment. Mine was here: https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cars-of-a-lifetime/coal-2003-honda-accord-ex-l-v6-too-perfect/
As I mentioned in my article, they make great cars but terrible COALs, as they are so drama free. Sounds like you experience was typical.
I’ve been following your COAL series closely, and it is eerily similar to mine (ties to Northeast Ohio, and we’re even about the same age). Curious to see what happens next week. I found that automotive perfection was not all that it was cracked up to be, and it sounds like you may have had a similar experience.
Yep, definitely. A COAL from me that’s on deck for the next couple of weeks will describe what happened to me when I didn’t pursue boring automotive perfection (spoiler alert – it really didn’t go well!)
Great story! Your salesman was my high school principal and he retired at the end of my senior year. A few years later I heard he was selling Hondas and was consistently one of their top salespeople.
Weird how small this world is – he was a great salesperson and we bought several Hondas from him. He got so popular, as I recall, that he didn’t need to take any walk-ins. He could get as many sales as he wanted simply through referrals. I think I still have the original brochure from when we bought this Accord that has his business card stapled to it.
This hits home on so many levels. I had the personal Honda-Revelation when I met my future wife who had recently purchased a new 88 Accord LX. One of the law partners at my office who had traded his first and only Cadillac on a new 86 Accord re-upped on a new Accord in 90.
Then there was my father who had driven our Accord (and who finally got tired of listening to my brothers ride him about his Taurus) got a white 90 LX much like yours, only with the automatic. It was a great car but Dad just never warmed to it. When he totalled it (by blacking out and hitting a bridge abutment – apparently an early warning sign of the brain tumor that eventually got him) he claimed to have made money on it during the year he had it. But he was just a Ford guy and went back to yet another white Taurus.
I remember Honda catching a lot of flack for the conservative styling on these, compared to the radical restyle that the 86 model had. Personally, I liked it and it has aged very well.
I never warmed to the stying of this gen of Accords, I liked the ’86-’89 gen better, better styling and just the right size. My Dad had an ’84 Accord sedan with automatic around 1995 or so. It had some rust issues but was still certifiable and he put in on the road and got maybe a year and a half out of it. He really liked that car and it was very nice to drive, though a bit small. You could go out in -30 degree winter weather, turn the key and that little engine would start up and run as smooth as glass even when cold. I was amazed that Honda was able to build an engine like that, while others could not. We were all sorry to see that car go when the rust got too bad.
All RIGHT, already…what CD were you listening to, when you got pinched for speeding on the turnpike? Spill it…inquiring minds want to know! 🙂
+1 😉
Afraid it wasn’t as exciting as the CC crowd might expect – it was “Say a Prayer” by Breathe. My musical tastes then (as now) skewed more toward VH1 than MTV.
Me too…I favored VH1 over MTV
This gen Accord was my first exposure to foreign cars. Friend’s parents had one, a dark maroon model with red interior. I was pretty young, but even then it amazed me how… modern it was inside compared to the GMs I was used to. The big, molded door locks as compared to the little fake chrome pins sticking out of the top of the doors. The round gauges- and tach!- compared to the blue lit strip speedo. And so forth. It also screamed quality compared to my parents’ Buicks as well.
Actually my memory was slightly faulty- their Accord was the prior model with the pop up headlights, but overall similar body style.
Your comment made me remember one other little thing about the car that was so different from other cars we had – the fact that there was only one key to do the doors, the trunk, and the ignition. Plus, the manual transmission lockout for the ignition required pushing in the key to turn it to the lock position (instead of the under-the-column button for the Ford). I really liked the ability in these pre-remote entry days to be able to twist the key twice in the exterior lock to unlock all the doors.
The more you look at these, the more games you find they changed. For example: these were first to have window-clear headlamp lenses with all the optics in the complex-shape reflectors. If you’re interested to read of the engineering feats that went into achieving that, the paper about the ’90 Accord headlamps is here, and the precedent 1973 paper wherein GM’s Guide Light division introduced the concept is here.
I knew Daniel would mention something about those headlamps with clear lenses and faceted reflectors here.
auto motor und sport (well-esteemed German automotive magazine) regularly tests the headlamps and prints the technical articles about their real-world performance along with ranking. Unfortunately, the magazine derided those as gimmick due to the poor and scattering light output.
Consequently, Honda reverted to the older headlamp design for its fifth generation Accord Touring (1993-1997) in Europe while the American version continued with clear lens and faceted reflectors. This time, Honda used the faceted lens biscuits behind the clear lens. That technology had spreaded to other manufacturers in the 1990s. The first generation European Ford Mondeo had that feature, for instance.
By the way, I would have to pay $27 each to read those linked papers. Oh, well…
Yeah, SAE prices have really gone through the roof the last few years; it wasn’t long ago each of those papers would’ve cost just $7. 🙁
The European version of the clear-lens ’90 Accord headlamp was a real dud. It used an H4 bulb for the low beam. That was a poor choice, because with H4 you can use only about half the total reflector/lens area to gather, amplify, and distribute light for the low beam. That’s okeh if you have a large lamp, but the low beam compartment of this Accord headlamp is both small and rectangular, so very little light could be gathered from the bulb, and low beam was necessarily feeble. Then you add the primitive nature of the H4 bulb itself, and the relative crudity of this early effort at reflector optics, and yep, you have a pathetic headlamp. It did meet the European standards, though, which—contrary to popular myth—is inferior to the US headlamp standard in terms of the minimum allowable seeing light on low beam.
The US version of the ’90 Accord lamp used a 9006 bulb for the low beam, so the whole reflector area could be used for low beam. Much more light within the US low beam, though it, too, was not terrific in terms of focus or formation (again due to the crude early optics).
Those inner optical-plate lenses you mention made big problems on the Ford Mondeo and for Porsche on the Boxster. The inner lenses ran hot and tended to go yellow (and then brown, and then burnt and melty). But it usually happened after the warranty had run out, so it wasn’t Ford’s or Porsche’s problem. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thanks for the most illuminating explanation as always!
Count me as a fan of this gen Accord, especially the wagon. Found a really clean nfive speed LX wagon a few years back and was smitten. I bought a new ’90 Civic SI and was really impressed by the over all build quality and utility. Probably the best car I have ever owned. I also drove my son’s cast off ’97 Acura CL coupe with five speed and I got him a beautiful 2004 Acura TSX when he was in college. ( I figured that he should have a car he loved when he was young, yeah, a bit indulgent) Still a big fan of the first two gen Acura coupes and may end up with one someday.
Like a lot of car guys I tend to want hobby cars that have more interest and mystique, so I’ve veered into the realm of the Jaguar. The Hondas were great, no drama drivers which i guess lessens their interest to me.
I had two of these Accords, a white on blue ’92 EX (which was sold shortly thereafter) and a Seattle Silver on maroon ’93 LX. The car was built like a jewel, and very much benefitted from the engineering that went into the original Acura Legend.
I distinctly remember that when disassembling the rear deck to put new speakers in, I noticed that the shell for the third stoplight was held to the deck with 10(!) screws. Both pieces were carpeted as well and though superfluous it was a testament to the overbuilt nature of these vehicles. Definitely a parallel to the effort Toyota put into the V30/XV10 Camry.
A good friend bought a 92 LX on my recommendation and though he doesn’t have the car anymore his partner is driving a 1993 EX in that wonderfully 90’s aqua green color.
My first Honda was a 88 CIvic, my current one a 01 Civic , about 420k trouble free miles between them. When I drove my first one, the first time I drove a Japanese car, it struck me as being an appliance, so smooth and quiet it must be electric. Their dependability, features and build quality were so far ahead of my fathers mid 70s Chevys, but they seemed to have no soul, they were just toasters. Well, they never did gain a soul, but they got my love and when this one needs to be replaced, I,ll be at the Honda dealer for another MT Civic.
Sandusky OH reminds me summer job working for amusement park back in 2005. I and other 3 friends was able to score 1993 Ford Aerostar with +450k miles on its second drivetrain for 600 USD which took me to Waschington DC and Niaggara Falls. That van had exhaust almost gone a brakes failling down with smoke just after 2nd or 3rd serious braking. We hit the road to DC despite van was refusing to start for previous 2 days, probably due the heavy rain allowing to get the water somewhere.
Ever since I wonder how would react police officer outside OH for car basically not meeting thier state technical inspection standards?
Car later die on the way to California due the missing transmission oil, but I was not already owner. I got my 150usd share back since I did not participate on the go west trip.
That summer I also learned the antivan hate from local friends who kept saying its mamavan. But for us, it was perfect vehicle.
I as well as my family have owned several of these 4th gen Accords – one of the best cars ever made IMO. My favorite of all of them was a Seattle Silver ’93 EX 5-speed wagon that we had for over 10 years – one of the best cars ever. My wife cried when we traded it in! It was sporty, rode well, reliable and was extremely well-made. I had also leased a new ’92 LX Coupe in Rosewood through my Dad’s printing business – loved the car for the 2 years I had it. My wife then girlfriend in 1996 needed a car. I told her to grab one of these cars and she did – I found her a ’92 LX Coupe in Bordeaux Red with the gray interior. And it was a 5-speed, too. She loved that car and had it for nearly 200k miles before we sold it to a friend who totaled it right after he got it (My wife was not happy with him LOL). The ironic thing was that my father-in-law thought his daughter was crazy buying a used car with 90k miles on it. Well, when he saw how great it was to her he decided to get one. In 2000, I found him a 1990 EX sedan in Cobalt Blue with about 78k miles. He had that car right up until last October when it had 256k miles and the rust had gotten so bad it would not pass inspection. It ended up at the local pick-in-pull and I was able to see it right before it was to be crushed! When I showed him pictures of it, you could tell he was sad. He loved that car and said he would have kept it forever if he could! Here is a picture of it looking ever-so-sad.
And for a 27-year-old car, the interior still looked brand new. The most durable cloth seats on any car I have ever encountered. I truly think these Accords were over-engineered and over-built. If you ever owned one or worked on one, you can relate.
Your father-in-law’s car was the same color combo as my brother’s ’90 Accord EX–it was really sharp looking. My brother’s interior also held up really well, even though it was used to tote around my nephew and niece when they were babies/toddlers. But the interior would clean right up every time, almost like a cloth version of the indestructible MB Tex.
The other thing notable about this interior shot is that all the plastics still look good, even after 27 years and 250k miles. Contrast that with the plastics GM used for years. They would frequently fade to all sorts of weird colors after a certain number of years–and in some cases crack and warp.
So true GN! That car was 27 years old, and look at how it held up! The only Achilles heel for the 4th gen Accord – and all of them did this – were cracks in the interior door handles, and climate control knobs that had about a 3-year lifespan before cracking too. Plus here in the Northeast, the salt ate away at these cars something fierce. Other than that, I can’t recall any other issues with these cars. They would just run and run and never complain doing so.
And yes GN, that was a great color combo back then. The day I took it home to show my father-in-law he wanted it immediately. And to think he only paid $3500 for it and kept it for over 16 years! If it hadn’t rusted so badly, he would still be driving it – no doubt in my mind!
I was driving a Civic LX at the time, but really wanted a metallic green EX coupe with the light cream seats. I remember stopping at the local Honda dealer on Sundays (no car sales in Pennsylvania on Sunday) to look at them.
But law school tuition put it out of my reach. These were handsome cars for the time, and I preferred them to the preceding generation.
My son still owns one. Bought it 6 years ago. Dinged up but still runs like a top. A ball to drive.
Great cars–some might say from the Peak Honda era. I owned a ’91 LX as well, and wrote my own COAL about it last year: https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cars-of-a-lifetime/coal-1991-honda-accord-lx-more-than-an-appliance/
It really was surprisingly fun to drive, and well put together was an understatement. Mine had 155K on the odometer when I bought it and it still felt tight, solid, and precise. Drove better than many other cars would have with 55K miles! I had it for about a year and then my Dad took it over, and drove it until 2009. It was totaled in a minor accident at that point, but it still ran well even afterward–I was rather annoyed a my parents for letting the insurance company have it, as I would have liked to buy it back with a salvage title, fix the bent body panels and keep it as a basic commuter.
The problem with these old Accords (or atleast the euro-Accord that succeded this) is replacing the front rotors, which is a nightmare. Totally unacceptable for a mass market car.
I don’t think there will ever be another car like the 4th gen Accord. It was a car that did so many things right in so many different ways. It could be your sporty coupe or sedan or even wagon, it could be your parent’s sedan (that you could turn into a fun sporty car when YOU drove it without them ever knowing LOL) and you could equip them to look so many different ways with wing spoilers, wheels and such. They had one of the sweetest shifting manual transmissions ever, and were one of the last Accords to use the 100% true 4-wheel independent double wishbone suspension – a remarkable setup – if you haven’t ever driven one you should. The ultra-low cowl and huge windshield made for visibility unlike any other car I’ve ever driven. And the overall fit and finish were second to none. I hope someday to possibly travel to the west coast where rust hasn’t killed an original car and buy another one – that is how much I love these cars!