Note: None of the pictures in this post are of the actual car
Since we had received good service from our 1989 Bonneville, we decided that the next “new to us” car would be the 1992 Bonneville. A friend had told us that the local dealer had one in the service bay, so we went over to check it out.
The new for 1992 Bonneville was the second series of front wheel drive Bonnevilles with the 3800 engine. When we checked out the interior, we found that it had a HUGE back seat that was easy to get in and out of as well as being very comfortable. Visibility was excellent due to the low beltline and copious amounts of glass.
The instrument panel was a vast improvement over the 89 Bonneville, except for the red back lighting of the gauges. At night, these blended in with the orange needles that made it all look the same. At least during the day, the lettering was white and the orange needles offered contrast. Our car had the basic cloth interior with bucket seats and the center console. The car was extremely comfortable and delivered excellent fuel economy (20 mpg city/30 mpg highway) along with good power. The 3800 was developing a good reputation. The only downside of that power plant was that if you had four people in the car, acceleration from a stop was good, but power began to wane at higher speeds. You can’t have everything.
The 3800 engine was an EGR less design that featured tuned intake manifold runners. The manifold was cast in aluminum, unlike those in later years which were made of plastic (Series II engines). The later use of plastic would haunt GM as the plastic manifolds were subject to deterioration and eventual coolant leakage into the cylinders. Series III engines would return to the cast aluminum manifolds. The only engine problem that we encountered was a failure of the water pump, whose bearing seized up. This caused the serpentine belt to come loose with the resultant loss of power steering. Fortunately, the failure happened right next to a service station who could and did repair the pump.
The Bonneville had a HUGE trunk compared to the 1989 model. With a low liftover height, it was extremely useful and easy to use. GM’s excellence in packaging the space in this car was one of the major selling points when we decided to get this car. With the great fuel economy and large interior/storage spaces, why drive a small car?
Now, wait just one minute! Weren’t you talking about a Bonneville and here’s a picture of a Dodge Shadow? It’s all related. One day, we were going to have the house carpets cleaned. The Bonneville was normally parked in the garage, but as I was working on a flipper car in the garage, it was parked in the driveway. I had also just purchased a Dodge Shadow for $900, intending to make a quick flip. How quick I would soon learn.
The Shadow was parked in front of our house on the street, and I needed to park the Bonneville also on the street. So I parked it behind the Shadow in front of the neighbor’s house. After the carpet cleaners left, we were sitting in the great room at the back of the house when I heard two dull thumps. OK, what was that. So I went to the front door of the house and saw a young lady coming up the walk. She said she had a leg cramp as she came down the street and hit the Shadow in the front. She then pushed it 20 feet into the Bonneville and pushed both cars another 10 feet. Pretty good using a Chevy Cavalier.
The Shadow was crumpled in the front and in the back. The Bonneville suffered a cracked bumper cover, cracked left front fender, and a damaged hood. Since both cars were legally parked on the street, her insurance would cover the repairs. The collision recommended by the insurance company made arrangements to collect both cars and provide for a rental. Since I wasn’t driving the Shadow, I only took one rental car.
After several go arounds with the collision, the Bonneville was finally fixed to our satisfaction. The Shadow, however, was determined to be a total loss. The insurance company conducted a survey of used car prices and determined that the Shadow was worth $2700. Where do I send the title? I only owned the car three days and tripled my investment with no work.
This accident would not be the last for our Bonneville. A couple of years later, my wife was stopped at a traffic light when two cars collided in the intersection. One of the cars hit the front of the Bonneville. It didn’t look too bad, with cracked fenders, cracked bumper cover, and bent hood, but it also had hidden frame damage. Our insurance company determined that it was a total and made us an offer for the car. We had over 100,000 miles on the car that were virtually trouble free, so I quit while I was ahead. Although I was tempted to buy the car from the insurance company and fix it myself, my wife had other ideas. That will be the subject of another COAL.
I don’t have any first-hand experience with these but I find myself rather impressed with them, based on what I’ve heard. Good fuel economy, decent handling, styling that’s less geriatric than a LeSabre… It seems these were one of the most desirable full-size domestic sedans of their time.
Love the way they look too. A pity the 2000 redesign made such a hash of the interior because I thought they looked even better outside. But by then, the Bonneville’s relevance was waning.
Also that’s a hilarious story about the Shadow! Nice work! Not that you did anything…
I was smart enough to park the Shadow in the right place at the right time. Just didn’t know it at the time.
I always thought these were especially handsome cars as well. Interesting that it has good trunk space. I always thought the rear end looked similar to the Infiniti J30, not quite a full 80’s Seville-style bustle-back, but definitely sloped for style over capacity.
Here’s a picture of the trunk space.
That Hoffmeister kink could have been sliced right off a 5 series
I got one of these as a rental during a trip thru San Diego and Palm Springs in the early 90’s. I was duly impressed on how well it handled the mountain roads, how comfortable and roomy the interior was, and that an American full size car had full instrumentation. I played with the idea of buying one, but passed for I was saving to buy a house at the time.
I think I would have been happier with the car compared to the house I did eventually buy!! ? ?
Not only did we have the 92 Bonneville, but I also owned a 98. Happy with both cars. Now we have two 2000-2001 LeSabres and a 2007 Lucerne. Future COALs coming on those.
Looking forward to those! My 2001 Lesabre was the worst car I have owned, whereas my 1988 Electra was the best car I have owned. Go figure . . .
The dash reminds me of a Saab. If they had put the ignition switch in the console and changed a few badges, they could of called it a Saab 9-9; Saab’s entry into the full size bracket!!!?
Actually, given the era, maybe Saab 90,000 would be more appropriate!
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/my-curbside-classic/my-curbside-classic-h-is-for-heavy-breathing/
I’ve already “said my piece” about these. For a kid who was born in 1977 the 2nd gen FWD H-bodys made it seem like “American Cars are BACK!” Still one of my favorite interstate cruisers among the cars my father has owned, after the Bonneville Mom forced him to switch to CUVs/SUVs.
+1. Great cars.
1978 here and we had a first-gen and second-gen H LeSsbre. Great cars.
I’m going to admit that I am not crazy about the styling of these cars, but that interior is one of the best large car interiors I have seen in awhile.
As is typical of GM, Chevy’s version of the same car looked kind of cheap.
After reading this write-up I wish I had at least tried one of these cars.
There was no Chevrolet H-Body; the Pontiac Bonneville, Oldsmobile 88/LSS & Buick Lesabre were it.
LTD is correct.
There was some internal planning at GM to eventually have the Caprice go to this platform but after every B-body sedan (except the Caprice) was canceled in 1985, Caprice sales took off.
FWIW I detest the 1st generation FWD H-body cars (too tiny, too badge-engineered) but love the 2nd and 3rd (or 2.5) generation cars. They were everything the W-body wasn’t.
Sorry, folks, but the silhouette for the IMPALA and the Bonneville looks so similar that I assumed they were the same car under the skin.
The Impala came out in 2000, much later. Also, as for the cars’ silhouette, it’s one of the most distinctive things about the H Body, they all have identical front doors with the rather unique “vent” window thats doesn’t open, the Impala does not.
Chevy had the Lumina, which was no competition for the Bonneville.
Lumina was W-body. Anyone who’s sat inside a W and an H (backseat especially) would quickly know the difference. H body rear seat is sized for honest to god adults and the W body backseat looks good until you sit down and your knees are up in the air because the seat was so low to the ground.
W-body development was such a boondoggle that it could have lead to GM bankruptcy in the late 80s if the corp had been just a little more careless than it already was.
You speak the truth, the first time I sat in a Lumina’s back seat I thought it was broken. Butt goes to the floorboard, knees in the air.
For a change, GM played this one right. IOW, when you paid for a better division’s version, you actually got a better car.
Plastic intakes with water passages just don’t seem like a good idea. The 4.6 Ford used this setup on their earlier engines, with similar results – leaking its coolant outside rather than inside like on some other engines.
A good friend of mine had this car, which replaced a 1986 Parisanne. He bought it used & it had front end damage which the dealer didn’t tell him about. I also remember taking a trip w/him on a highway to NH on a Friday night & having all of the lights go off all of a sudden which was an interesting experience.
There were two positive cables on the battery. Corrosion on them would cause the problem described. It happened to me. Fun job to clean them up.
I owned two of these, a ’94 and a ’99. They overlapped for a few years which made maintenance easy. Loved them both. The 3800 was (mostly) great, handling
, comfort, space with damn good fuel economy ‘specially on the freeway.
Since I kept them so long I had fun times with rusting fuel lines and brake lines…ugh.
The ’99 stranded me with intake failure/hydrolock – I was trying to stretch it just a few more weeks until I’d have to to proactively replace the manifold – I lost.
My last Boneville was an ’05 GXP – it was NOT so fuel efficient as these two, but damn was it quick.
I had those wheels on my ‘97 GTP. /sarc on/ Fun to clean, eh? /sarc off/.
I had rented a ‘92 Bonnie in California back in the fall of ‘91. It must’ve been just delivered as there was less than 20 miles on the clock. I really liked the car the week we were out there, driving around Yosemite, Lake Tahoe, and Napa. When the SSEi came out, I really wanted one. I would end up getting its smaller cousin in the year 2000, slightly used.
I never had the intake manifold problem you all describe. I’m pretty sure the 3800 Series II with the blower had an aluminum intake manifold….
Having owned a ’94 LeSabre for a number of years (inherited from my mom), I can attest to the basic goodness of the ’92+ H-bodied cars. Maybe not perfect, but still one of GM’s best latter-day efforts.
I bought a 1999 Bonneville SSEI a few years ago when I too was flipping cars. I can second all the positives you mentioned about these cars. At the time, I had a 40 mile round trip commute to work and I found myself driving the Bonneville nearly everyday instead of my regular car. I found it to be very comfortable and pretty quick with the supercharged 3.8. I really liked the way the SSEI looked too. I made a nice profit on it as well. A guy brought his 16 year old daughter to the house to look at it and they came back the next day and bought it. I thought it was a rather unique choice of car for a 16 year old girl but I also thought it was cool.
The part about the young lady getting a leg cramp and slamming into both of your cars has me wondering how I would have reacted in the same situation. By that, I mean from her point of view. So she got a charley horse in her right leg, and that made her press down the accelerator, thereby Unintentionally Accelerating into both of your cars? I pride myself on being a skilled driver and I love to brag about my quick reflexes, but have to wonder if I might have done the same thing.
These are on my short list for my next highway car. Reliable, comfortable and high 20s at today’s speed limits
The 92-99 Bonneville was a true winner for GM
I drove many of this generation over the years as friends had them. I on the other hand have not owned one yet. I almost bought a 1998 40th anniversary Bonneville that was on that used car lot I hang out at. It was in great condition with all the 40th ann. badging and floor mats. It only had about 50,000 miles on it. But it got sold before I got serious about buying it.
I did have a 1998 Buick Lesabre and a 2005 Lesabre.
I loved the 1998 Lesabre. It was roomy, comfortable to drive and had good power for the highway.
The 2005 Lesabre was a big piece of shit. The 1998 felt well built. The 2005 felt cheap and not well built. I bought the 2005 Lesabre from a GM dealer in 2010 and it only had a bit over 40,000 miles on it and had a lot of service records. It was well taken care of and was a local car.
Parents last car was a ’93 LeSabre, comfortable, bullet proof 3800 w/ aluminum intake manifold. At around 100k miles the trans was rebuilt, around 130k AC compressor failed and filled the system with debris, dad got billed around 2k dollars for that repair.
After they could no longer drive brother replaced fuel pump and drove it until he was tired of being pulled over because of several dents and scrapes, dad waited a little to long to give up the keys.
Dents and scrapes are now against the law, are they?
I really liked these at the time as a kid, and they were solid hits, at least in the Chicago area where they were everywhere. The styling even aged well despite being extremely 90s jellybean, and in fact the 06 Dodge Charger seemed to copy the front end design, actually the exaggerated hoffmeister kink too now that I think of it. Just compare the grille and headlight shapes
I owned a 93 Bonneville for a few years. Bought it with 120k miles from my sister. Traded it in on a 2007 Vibe when the transmission started acting up at 160k and rust was doing a number on the strut towers.
I saw a number of these where the rust got a foothold under the rear seat and ate out the seams in front of the wheel wells.
I had my ’99 in the body shop to have a huge rust hole in the rear wheel well patched it was football sized….completely forgot about that issue ?♂️ Car was about 11 years old at that point and still looked great from the outside…”Hey, what is that water sloshing sound?”
Had a ‘96 Bonneville that was an improvement over the ‘89 it replaced. Roomy, comfortable and peppy with the Series II 3800. Was fine for 7 years and 100K miles, when it started to self-destruct. Transmission, A/C and power steering all failed within a year. Electrical gremlins arose which never could be resolved. The last American car I ever owned.
Succeeding Acura’s and a Lexus educated me as to what true quality in a vehicle really could be.
It was definitely the best-looking of the H-bodies at the time. I always thought it looked better than our 1992 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight