By mid-1977, I had secured steady (“permanent temporary”) employment and had begun to develop my design skills on real-world auto-industry projects as a Product Adaptation Specialist at Volvo of America Corporation. Still living at home with my dad, I took over his mid-1960s mortgage payment, utility bills, and most other miscellaneous expenses. By then, I also enjoyed the benefit of a Volvo daily driver (the “handicap car” referred to in last week’s COAL) as my commuting vehicle.
Not only that, since I had a daily round-trip commute of about 100 miles, –longer than many of my colleagues– I was asked to provide fuel-economy records which were compiled by Volvo’s Technical Center, a group of mostly Swedish engineers located nearby Northvale, New Jersey. They were tasked with reporting quality-related issues (and proposed solutions) back to the mother ship in Gothenburg. As Volvo was paying for my gasoline, I was glad to oblige.
The point of all that preamble is merely to say that with a full-time job and relatively low expenses, I was fortunate enough to have saved a bit of money. How does a confirmed car enthusiast turn a small bank account into an even smaller bank account? Read on.
As if commuting for two hours each weekday and spending my working hours engrossed in the automobile industry weren’t enough, I had begun a subscription to Hemmings Motor News, scrutinizing every page in detail in search of my first classic car. In truth, though, I skipped over most of the “Non-Fords For Sale” sections which were then arranged somewhat haphazardly. I first became aware of Hemmings on one of my many sojourns to Burbank’s Autobooks while attending Art Center, and have remained a subscriber ever since.
I also continued my occasional Sunday morning drives to the used-car lots of local new-car dealerships. That’s how I had found my ’69 Mustang, after all, so the possibility of finding another gem in similar circumstances wasn’t a complete impossibility, at least in my fevered brain. One of these stops was at Gardner Porsche-Audi, the source of my ’74 Audi Fox, where I was briefly seduced by a previously-owned black on black Porsche 914. Ultimately, as my designer genes (sorry) kicked in, I couldn’t see myself living with its distinctive proportions (especially in side view) and the upright formality of its basket-handle targa roof. So the Porsche was out.
I can’t say what led me to the ’67 Alpine. I’d certainly been aware of the model, maybe due to its general similarity with the ’55-’57 Ford Thunderbird, especially after its fins were toned down with the debut of the Series IV Alpine in 1964. I will say that I’d long admired the two-seat T-Birds, primarily the ’55 and ’57 models (not so much the ’56, with its exposed spare), so perhaps there was a bit of subliminal attraction to the Sunbeam.
In any case, Hemmings led me to Hatboro, Pennsylvania, where I met a young gentleman who had advertised his 1967 Sunbeam Alpine for sale. A Series V, the ’67 Alpine represented the last iteration of Rootes’ two-seater, with its five main-bearing OHV four-cylinder displacing 1725 cc and developing a claimed 100-HP.
This particular example was finished in BRG (or “Forest Green”, according to Rootes) with a black vinyl interior and the standard (non-overdrive) four-speed manual gearbox. Its odometer registered just over 50,000 miles, and the car looked well-kept, inside and out. After a brief test drive and some dickering, a mutually acceptable price was agreed upon (I seem to remember $1,000). The 65-mile drive home was uneventful, and the Alpine took its place in our detached one-car garage, leaving the Volvo and Dad’s ’69 Torino parked outside.
Soon afterward, a phone call to Chrysler Service Publications netted me parts, service, and owner’s manuals, which a Mr. T. C. Sidebottom (yes, his actual name) on the other end of the line kindly sent at no cost (“We’re trying to get rid of these anyway,” he confided). Thus armed, I began my foray into the world of LBCs (little British cars), an affliction from which I still suffer, some 47 years on.
I refrained from attaching this bumper sticker to the Volvo.
Strictly speaking, BRG ought to be very dark or near-black.
That’s a very light forest green, admittedly!
T.C. Stromberg might have been the most apt name for the Rootes 1725…though the Volvo guys would have insisted it was pronounced ‘stromborough’
I’ve always had that love/hate relationship with the 914 too and I’ve never worked out how to fix it. Hollow flying buttresses as on the late Lancia 137s might work, or merely get in the way.
More like Stroumm buery in Swedish.
also the true name of Volvo’s home is Goteborg, pron: Yuta beury.
There’s no specification for generic British racing green. Just green.
When I saw that Alpine, I can’t stop to think of its muscled sibling the Tiger in color red driven by Maxwell Smart alias Agent 86. 😉
One of the red “Tigers” used in Get Smart was actually an Alpine, since there was no room for the concealed forward-facing machine gun in the Tiger’s engine compartment.
Maxwell Smart’s solitary fake Tiger contributed greatly to the incorrect notion that there were others in the show.
With that said, imagine Agent 86 having to make the choice between a Tiger or a machine gun-equipped Alpine.
Somehow I never figured that the need to be able to fit an actual machine gun into Max’s car would have had much to do with what appeared on TV. Next thing I know you’re going to be telling me that he really could make phone calls from his shoe!
By the way, Gene Winfield, the guy behind constructing the props in Agent 86’s cars is going to make an appearance tomorrow on CC 🙂
Hmmn, 914? On my way down to the local biker watering hole yesterday, I noticed an orange one in the lot of a local independent used car lot that usually carries a lot more interesting stuff than the typical SUV’s, crossovers, and pickup trucks. I’m forcibly stopping myself from dropping by and taking a serious look . .
I never saw the TBird/Alpine similarity before, but now that you’ve pointed it out, it’s obvious. I think the proportions and size are just different enough to really hide it. As for the 914, my memory is that it was what I’d now call Aztek-ugly when it came out, especially coming from the same manufacturer as the still new but already classic 911. But for me, it has aged very well. I’ve only driven one, briefly, a later 2.0 (but not a 6) and I really liked it.
What a great choice! Like Dman, I had never noticed the similarity between the Alpine and the Thunderbird before, but certainly see it now.
Nice and I too missed the similarity to the T-Bird until it was pointed out .
I had a couple VW/Porsche 914’s , they were actually pretty good cars and handled very well .
BEWARE OF RUST if you go look at one .
-Nate
RUST/tinworm is probably the single most expen$ive problem with a 914. My ’74 2.0L 914 definitely had that “problem”, but the car was a absolute blast to drive on twisty roads!!! 🙂
Attractive? Not really, but from inside the low slung cockpit the view out was good and driving FUN was up there with about anything that had 4 wheels (2 too many after all! 🙂 )
It felt like driving a large, quick go-kart, and seemed like it could handle any curves that could come its way.
After chasing the 914’s rust I swore I would never purchase another car with that problem and I haven’t. DFO
I understand about the 914’s polarizing looks, but it was in a different world compared to the elderly Alpine when it came to its dynamic qualities as well as its roomy interior and other aspects. A 914 still feels fairly “modern” to drive today; an Alpine is a quaint and charming antique.
I’ve had all kinds of cars, including 914s and Alpines. The Alpine to me was always a bit nicer inside than my Triumphs and MGs, and the 914, though effective at what it was designed for, always felt soulless. It was wider inside than my Spitfire I had at the same time, but nowhere near the leg room. Overall, I prefer Triumphs and Austin Healeys now, the 3000 for long trips, and the GT6 for more aggressive driving and commuting. My 914 had a paint job that was the reverse of the SoCal SCCA dealer race cars, so it really stood out. Especially when used as a prop for a shoot for an article in an artsy mag.
Good choice, the Hillman Husky sports model, I have basically the same car in 4 door station wagon, well mechanically the same anyway, I have a Weber type twin choke and flows which helps it along together with 1mm overbore and decked block and skimmed head so the compression is back, ity ran ok with none for a few years.
Always liked the 914 since it came out, they came in great colors too, sadly never owned one.
Had several ’68 to ’72 Spitfires, they have a surprising amount of foot room and, while not fast really, they are great fun to drive. The earliest ones have the IRS jack-under rear axles problem on hard cornering and can be scary at times to the unknowing.
I can understand being turned off by the 914, at age 8 I considered the Fiat X 1/9 much more attractive. Brock Yates’ description of the 914 as looking like a transistor radio was dead on. Also the 914 had some odd cost cutting due to its Volkswagen origin such as the non-adjustable passenger seat.
I never thought of that Alpine as looking like a T-Bird, but now I can’t unsee it. There is at least one other use of the Alpine/Tiger in popular media. The 1990s TV adaptations of Liza Cody’s 1980s Anna Lee detective stories had the heroine driving a Sunbeam Alpine.
Regarding the 914 – I love them with the 916GT arches, but, if I had the millions necessary would love to rebody one like this – I think Italdesign’s Tapiro could have extended the life of that platform well into the ‘80s…
My brother bought a used 62 Alpine in 1968 and promptly blew the motor.
He bought a second one for parts and swapped out motors in our driveway.
Fun times when you’re a little kid (9). The neighbors were thrilled!!