Back in the year 2000, an animated kids’ show was on constant rerun, called “The Magic School Bus”. The bus driver was named “Miss Frizzle”, voiced by Lily Tomlin, and she would drive the kids on the bus into all sorts of fantastic science-y field trips. Our local museum had well-attended science programs, led by a museum employee dressed up as Miss Frizzle. Our by-then five year old daughter was enchanted with it, and later grew up to work in a science lab. Did the show have an influence on her affinity for science work?
I am getting slightly off-track here, as the story for today is about carpooling those five-year-olds to school, and to the museum programs, in the vehicle of the day most widely and universally used for the task, at least in our neighborhood and environs. They could have been painted yellow and labeled as school buses, and then they would have lined up like Blue Birds or Crown Coaches at the elementary school, indistinguishable from the rest of the Odysseys, but for details. As it was, a variety of grey and tan and silver Honda Odysseys would converge at the school grounds, at the beginning and end of each school day, depositing and later collecting flocks of five year olds and eight year olds. Our neighborhood was spread out and hilly, and for some reason, the school district was unwilling to provide bus service, and somehow got away with it. So the parents took it upon themselves to arrange a highly organized and structured carpool network, that got passed down from each set of parents, to the ones who followed a few years later, as their kids came of age (elementary or middle school age, that is).
“Prime time” for carpooling, for our young ones, was about 1998 through about 2010. We had the Intrepid, which held five, including the driver, but it was time to be able to carry seven, if one wanted to be fully involved in carpooling and carrying one’s full weight in the task. There was no way that kids could simply be stuffed headlong into work vans or the backs of station wagons, without dedicated seats and seat belts. The level of parental helicoptering in 2000 demanded certain minimums, such as a seat and seat belt for every smaller-sized person. And to have a capacity of five instead of seven let down the side, and also messed up the carpool scheduling. A seat for the driver plus six more for the little persons was what was expected.
The Intrepid was also getting on in years and miles. Beyond the limited seating and the spectacular transmission explosion, the car was simply getting on in years, and things such as switches and dashboard controls, along with all the innards of the doors, were getting a bit sloppy and undependable. We had gotten good use out of the Dodge, but it was time to move on; the stars were aligned for such a change.
The Odyssey had sort of come out of nowhere in 1999. The older version, like so many Japanese van offerings of the day, was a bit small and lightweight. The Japanese vans generally weren’t optimized for large populations of big kids, often because of quirky Japanese home-market rules and tax rates on car size and engine size. Additionally, the first Honda offering utilized traditional front-hinged doors for the second row, which was a bit away from American expectations. The minivan in the U.S. was supposed to have a sliding second door, for rapid ingress and egress, en masse, of the little passengers. Alternatively, loading bulky cargo was a lot easier when the door simply slid out of the way. So while the first-gen Odyssey sold reasonably well, the minivan buying world was not beating a path to its door (so to speak).
For model year 1999, Honda pulled out all the stops. Detecting a substantial market for a larger, differently configured minivan, Honda decided to build a van optimized for the U.S. market, rather than the up-to-then custom of exporting a van optimized for Japanese customers. The second generation Odyssey would be a big, heavy brute of a vehicle. 800 pounds and 80 horsepower were added to the mix.
The second generation Odyssey weighed in at 4,200 pounds plus, with a 210 horsepower 3.5 liter VTEC engine, seats and seat belts for seven, and sliding doors standard on both sides of the van (typically a high-priced option on some other vans). Also a fold-down third seat into a flat floor, and two substantial second seats that could be folded forward or removed all together, to make a roomy and long flat floor, with a high ceiling, that could be easily loaded and unloaded from three directions at once, if need be.
Minivans had been popular for a couple of decades by then. Early Baby Boomers came of child-rearing age in the ‘60s and early ‘70s, so the Oldsmobile Vista Cruisers and the big Ford wagons were the family trucksters of the day. Mid-Boomers had kids in the ‘80s into the early ‘90s, and they got Chrysler (and Ford and GM) minivans of various sorts. Late Boomers generally married and had kids a bit later, and their family truckster needs came to be in the late ‘90s through the first decade of the 2000s. This latter group is where Honda hit its minivan home run.
Honda and Toyota had built a long string of solid Civics and Accords, and Corollas and Camrys. It was natural for Late Boomers to trade up from any of those to the second-gen Odyssey, once the kids’ transportation needs became front and center. The Honda vans were not cheap, but they were sold out in 2000. Dealers were marking them up $10k to $15k over a substantial sticker price to begin with, and still selling out. Our personal experience was that the dealer would call us when the van was in, and we could take it or leave it, at the inflated mark-up price. As to colors and features, it was “take it or leave it”, and go back to the end of the line if you didn’t like the one that they came up with. Oh, yes, leave a substantial refundable deposit with us, in the meantime. Ugh.
We finally found a family-owned Honda dealer across town, who took down the combination of color and features that we wanted, and told us that if or when the combination we wanted came in, they would call us and we could buy it at the sticker price. No deposit required. They told us that things were so sold out that they never quite knew what would come in on the truck. But eventually we got the call, paid the sticker price, and were treated very well. Well done, Tipton Honda!
The dashboard and fittings were standard fare for Honda. A bit generic, but well laid out and gave off the feel of high quality. The van had a ton of leg room, shoulder room, and head room, as befits the size of the thing. The engine pulled well from all speeds, and with a reasonable 19 to 20 mpg in mixed driving. There was one bug in the mix, that became well known over time, and that was the transmission. Sure enough, we lost ours at a bit over 100k miles, and with mere weeks left on the dealer-offered extended warranty, that we had bought. Tipton cheerfully replaced the transmission for free. We seemed to be having a string of bad luck with automatic transmissions here, two for two, including the Intrepid.
The van felt exceptionally solid. Slamming the doors hard gave off a kind of ringing sensation. So, too, the van would sort of ring, with a small high-pitched harmonic, over rough pavement. A sound not of flexing, but of not flexing, but pushing back instead. Tight as a drum. Whether or not the sensations and harmonics actually meant something, they were subliminal signals of strength and solidity.
We sold the van a few years ago to a charity, for peanuts, after over 150k hard miles and over a decade and a half of driving. The first few years it served its role as part of the local carpool fleet, and then for years as a drive-to-college vehicle. It was “the” vehicle of our kids’ growing up and family driving time, so it is associated with many nice memories. Both kids learned how to drive by practicing in it. The sequence of letters in the license plate was “KDB”, making it truly the “kiddie bus”.
Toyota actually preceded the second-gen Odyssey with the Sienna for the 1998 model year, which came in just under the 1999 Odyssey in most measurements. The rising popularity of SUVs and CUVs, for buyers that didn’t need to absolutely maximize the number of seating positions, served to split up the market into a number of subsets over the years, so the Odyssey craze played out a bit. But the Honda Odyssey still continues today, in roughly the form as introduced for 1999. They just don’t sell out like they did for a few years.
Same colour, same (almost) dash, same number of seats, same stand-out quality, but take away 10 inches in length, 600lbs in weight, 1.2 litres, two cylinders and 60 bhp, and I drove this very car for 6 years and for just the same uses, albeit from 110miles (badly maintained) to 210miles, where a learner kid finally did it in for good.
Outside the US, what appears almost identical to this – minus sliding doors – Honda made the rest-of-world job for three generations since the one the US first saw. Mine too, btw, had a dodgy trans, though it did keep on keeping on till the end. And my god, how useful the interior was – fridges, couches, dump-runs, rocks, timber, and yes, children, if they insisted.
Initially, I was no fan of the thing, but after a while, ignoring the too-light steering, I came to greatly admire it. With no vomity kids aboard, it could be pushed remarkably hard around corners. It rode firmly, but well, and the front seats were contrary to their appearance, being amongst the best I’ve used for long trips (helped by the uprightness, ofcourse). Performance was a bit marginal at times, and almost certainly no good for US freeway speeds, but here, it was fine, even when towing smallish trailers, and always giving about 27mpg. It too felt bodily impervious right to the end, despite considerable yearly holiday dirt road use.
It liked to use oil (another reason we let it perform a bit gently, a hard fang in it could lower the sump dramatically!), it did sometimes break as the years wearied it – including the bottom external a/c/alternator/p/s pulley snapping off! – and it liked to munch brakes and tyres too greedily, but it otherwise rarely failed us.
It’s the sort of car you take no notice of till you own one, and then you realize why, in certain very common life circumstances, folk value reliable, useful cars so much. That it was really good to drive was an unexpected bonus, which perhaps only double-wishbone-obsessed Honda could deliver at the time.
And you realize why the Japanese industry is so dominant: it has been earned.
4,800 pounds ?! .
Did either of you ever change the tranny’s ATF and filter ? .
-Nate
“Did either of you ever change the tranny’s ATF and filter ?”
It was my understanding that these trannys suffered from a design problem where at least one key area was under-lubricated. Later versions jerry-rigged a spray jet for that place. I don’t think Honda got these really sorted out until around 2006 or so. They were also a problem in the V6 Accords and Acuras. I recently saw the first mid 00s Acura TL I have seen out on the road in ages. A co-worker’s was really nice except for the transmission. Honda took care of owners for a long time, but when that ended I think the cars went away.
Apparently the problem was with the torque converter, possibly starting with its lock-up clutches. V6 cars, specially the heavy ones like the Odyssey, were much more likely to be affected than the 4 cylinders.
Speaking of Honda torque converter clutches:
Debbie’s 2005 all-wheel drive Honda Element with about 125K miles and 4 speed automatic developed an occasional slight vibration at speed that went away when the throttle was released. I thought it might be an engine mount and took it to our mechanic who diagnosed it as clutches in the torque converter needing fresh fluid. The fluid was replaced and the occasional vibration went away.
At a later time I noticed the Element’s rear differential was making noises and a slight vibration on slow and sharp curves. The mechanic did a series of three fluid drains, refills, and test drives and the rear differential issues went away.
As others here have noted, Honda has always made it well known that one never flushes their automatic transmissions; just drain and replace on level ground. More than once is OK.
This was the first time for these fluid changes, but the Element has been driven very gently with no towing (she bought it used in 2007).
Debbie is regularly asked in parking lots if she want to sell her Element.
She does not.
Mom had one of these for a while. It was named Lurch because of the transmission. She was pretty let down after her experience with her previous car, the Mercury Villager minivan. She still mentions that car some 20 years later.
The transmission in my 2000 TL had been replaced at 50,000 km and I bought it at 66,000 km. After six years and another 80,000 km, I had no problem with it.
Yes, it was a herky-jerky affair but it always worked.
A Honda tech told me that the transmissions fail from either overloading or stomping the accelerator from a stop.
It is funny that for a guy who has been as favorably disposed to Hondas as I have been, this generation of Honda minivan left me cold. The two I experienced were a 99 owned by friends and an 05 owned by a co-worker. I found both of them to be a bit flexy in their structure. But then I was comparing them to my 96 1st gen Odyssey and to my 99 Chry T&C, both of which I found uncommonly taut.
Those transmissions were odd in another way. The Chrysler units would crap out, but could be easily rebuilt by almost anyone. The Honda were not that way. A co-worker represented a good-sized repair shop, and that guy quit working on those transmissions because rebuilds had a really high failure rate. The word I got was that only Honda-out-of-the-box new or factory rebuilt units were the way to go. Which sounds like the way you handled it.
But there was a lot to like about these and they were hugely popular. At the Catholic grade school where my kids went, we had no busses so there was a beautifully orchestrated drop-off and pick-up system where Honda minivans were probably second only to the Mopars. Suburbans were well represented as well. Now, this is the one Honda of its era I never see on the roads. Accords and Civics are still out there (the opposite of Mopars, where the minivans are the only ones you ever see).
I have a vague notion that Honda designed their own autoboxes, which alone would make the job more specialized. Funny business, them doing that, because my experience of various Honda self-changers were that they always felt super-efficient, but pretty herky and thunky, like an old Mercedes box in a bad mood.
They did design their own automatics, and they were quite different than all the rest. Honda refused to pay royalties for the planetary gearsets everyone else was using, so they used spur gears. This started with the very first two-speed Hondamatic in 1973. Also, they wanted a more efficient automatic, and all of them were so, as a consequence. They’re really a bit more like an automated manual in some respects, with a torque converter. And yes, they do have a more mechanical feel as a consequence, like the old MB boxes.
But they got pretty refined over time; the 5 peed in our 2013 TSX is terrific: a perfect balance between soft and hard. Or I should say “soft” when driven gently, and “hard” when driven hard. It’s one of the best features of that car, even if it only has 5 gears. It does not hunt like many of the 6+ gear automatics.
Rebuilding a conventional planetary gearset transmission isn’t hard at all. In fact, it’s pretty much idiot proof. You simply pull it all out, replace the friction material and put it all back the way it was at the beginning. It got to the point I could rebuild a THM350 in a couple of hours. The rebuild kits cost like $30 and I would resell them for $800. Fat profits in transmission rebuilds, especially with the THM200 debacle.
The Honda units are, like Paul stated, more like an automated manual. They are indeed more mechanical feeling and full power upshifts just bang right off.
About the Honda Odyssey transmission problem, I knew at five cases in my very limited social circles of friends and acquaintances. One we actually experienced was we were on our way to Philly airport with my friend 3rd generation of Odyssey with around 85 k miles. The transmission suddenly gave up in Interstate 95 around Center City of Philly. We had to use the taxi to finish the journey to airport, and my friend got an expansive repair bill. He eventually found someone in Brooklyn to rebuild the transmission for $2500 with 2-year/25k miles warranty (in yr 2013). He used the van for another 10k miles and sold the van. The repair shop said the Honda problem was big engine and heavy vehicle with weak transmission gears. The shop used gears from a Michigan company which claimed with stronger gears. As for Honda transmission problems in general, most mechanics would say the newer one have been reliable, but still hear some vans have problems. My friend has a 2016 model, around 40k miles he heard some noises while on the highway, the dealer shop found metal debris in transmission fluid, Honda only offered flush transmission fluid and refused to replace the unit—currently I have a 2015 model with 90k miles, so far its transmission is OK. We bought Honda over the Toyota van because it is much better drive and finish, and $2000 cheaper.
Great article! Oh my…this takes me back to the first 10 years of parenthood. For me, that was mostly during the aughts, so it was the 3rd gen Odyssey that I mostly encountered. These things were so extraordinarily popular when my kids were in elem and middle school that dropoff and pickup times at school would look like the assembly line at a Honda factory. I swear that just about everyone in town had one.
In most of the schools around here (the public ones at least), school bus transport was indeed available; it’s just that a growing % of parents refused to use it…to the point where finally (i.e., nowadays) suburban districts started to cut back on bus routes due to low ridership. Not reduced attendance, mind you, but just that many many parents preferred to ferry the kids by Odyssey (and now, Tahoe/Suburban/Expedition) vs. making them ride the bus.
But back to the vehicle…I found that most of the mommies (and yes, these were mostly the daily driver vehicles of women…in my experience) were very happy with the Odyssey. Weak points in the 3rd generation had to do with brakes and wheel bearings (both frequent and expensive repairs), and the overall cost of maintenance (but that’s because most were dealer-serviced). And they weren’t great in the snow (a concern where I live)…even the AWD versions weren’t good, it was reported. But the functionality of the space was supposedly beyond compare, and that was the main driver of the popularity.
I still see a lot of these at schools, but not nearly as many as 10 – 12 years ago. I do wonder what happened to all of those well-maintained, but fuller of goldfish crumbs/doghair/spilled drinks than you could imagine – vans.
My sister bought a very well maintained 2001ish Honda Oddessy about 3 years ago for $2500 bucks or so. It had 271,000 miles on it, I think, it was a stupid number of miles but was a 1 owner van with a stack of service reciepts. Had a transmission replacement once in its life. The interior, including the driver’s seat looked brand new, it was stupid clean inside. Body wise it was nice, zero rust, all that grey/greenish paint looked decent for the age. Cold a/c, good heat, all the buttons worked like new
Anyways that van gave them FLAWLESS service for the next 2 years or so. Hell we even road tripped in it for about 400 miles, then 1000 miles on another trip visiting family. Once they were in a bit better situation financially they sold the almost 300,000 mile Oddessey to another family member in need of cheap wheels
Four kids. Baseball/basketball/soccer/swimming games and meets. Annual travel from Kansas City area to Colorado in the winter and Cape Cod/Maine in the summer. A golden retriever. After a Villager and a Windstar came a 1999 Odyssey… then a 2003… then a 2007. They filled the bill as no CUV/SUV ever could.
I chuckle at the CUV-driving, anti-minivan folks, saying they don’t want to look like soccer moms. Well, all the soccer moms drive CUV’s now, and don’t have the combination of space, comfort, versatility, reasonable economy, and acceptable driving characteristics of a mini-van. Minivans are wonders.
Our kids are grown and our grandkids don’t need us to move them about. I do miss the Odyssey versatility… but as with most pickup truck owners, we really don’t need it.
We got a 2016 odyssey new and its been great but it doesnt have that solid feel like the 2nd gen. My 2015 accord doesnt either. Honda started cheaping their interiors and dont have that rock solid feel that 80s 90s and early 2000s hondas had.
That being said its been awesome except for 1 thing, guess? U guesses right, automatic transmission. Last winter with 60k miles it began shuddering 35-40 . Theres a tsb saying do a atf and filter change. I we had it done and its fine. Now the atf interval in the owners manual is 100k. If honda knew this could happen (ie the tsb) set the atf interval for 40k or 50k!!!! Save us the greif!!
Did you consider any other minivans? When I got an odyssey in 2015 here is how it went.
Toyota sienna- drove like a bus and couldnt sit 3 car seats accross row 2.
Chrysler/Dodge- drove better than the sienna but couldnt seat 3 seats accross row 2.
Kia Sedona- 2nd row seats not removeable.
Honda Odyssey- drove like a car and could sit 3 car seats accross row 2. Winner.
The 3 seats accross rhe 2nd row was a dealbreaker because my 2 and 4 year old couldnt buckle or unbuckle themselves. We had a baby and there was no way we were crawling back to row 3 to buckle and unbuckle. Our odysseys now got 60k and still going strong BUT CHANGE THE ATF EVERY 50K! HONDAS 100K ATF INTERVAL IS BS!
“I” did not consider any minivans at all. This was my spouse’s choice, done and done, except for actually locating a specimen, which she also mostly took on. My task was to find a reason not to pursue the choice, and I had no qualms about it.
As to the transmission, we did follow the manufacturer’s recommendations, neither more nor less, and in hindsight, that may not have been the best way to go. But as carefully and meticulously as Honda did and does things, we had no reason not to believe them on their maintenance recommendations, until after the fact.
I often criticize GM for often having made their early buyers the “beta-testers” of their new car models. It looks like, in this single case, Honda ended up doing the same thing, even if unintentional, on the transmissions.
You mentioned hondas solid build quality. Unfortunately that went away in the mid-late 2000s. Interior feels more like a nissan with thin trim, flimsy pannels with fewer anchors. Theyre still super reliable but dont have that rock solid build feel 80s and 90s hondas had.
The 1999 Odyssey was the first minivan to give chrysler real competition. All the ones before it were too big too small too weird or lacking dealbteaker features. Funny how it took 16 years for another manufacturer to get it right.
This was covered in the “How Hard Can it be to Build a Minivan?” series. The 2nd generation Odyssey might not have been the first real competition if it weren’t for that ‘magic’ folding third row seat. Chrysler eschewed the magic seat for a powered rear hatch. It was the first real mistake Chrysler made with their minivan. The power hatch was a nice feature, just not as nice as the Honda’s folding 3rd row seat.
But what I find fascinating is there was another new minivan just a year later that, to me, was nearly perfect: the 2nd gen Mazda MPV. Not only did it have the magic seat, but it also included roll-down sliding door windows (which I thought the Odyssey had, too, but I might be mistaken on that one).
Plus, I always thought that Mazda going with a size comparable with the original SWB T-115 Chrysler made it nearly perfect. The MPV was much easier to drive than the bigger minivans. If there was a fly in the ointment, it was the rather lackluster 2.5L V6/4-speed auto in the Mazda, but that was quickly remedied two years later with a larger 3.0L/5-speed. It made the MPV the ‘just right’ Goldilocks of minivans.
Unfortunately, consumers still liked the Odyssey and Grand Caravan better. A real pity the MPV has never really gotten the recognition it deserved.
Two kids born in the early- and mid-nineties, but we never owned a minivan. And though I’ve driven a few, and ridden in more, I’m not sure I’ve ever been in an Odyssey. Our eight seatbelt hauler in that time frame was our 80 Series Land Cruiser. Rubicon Trail on Sunday; school run on Monday. The center seatbelt in the 3rd row was a lap belt but we weren’t as concerned about those things then. No airbags either … or sliding door. But kids are flexible. By the way, I’ve watched more than my share of Magic Schoolbus but never realized that Lily Tomlin was the voice of Ms Frizzle. Thanks for the education! CC is always a learning experience.
We had a 2001 Odyssey LX. While I consider it to be a vehicle that did it’s job without many problems, I won’t ever include it on a list of my favorite cars.
I was aware of Honda’s automatic transmission issues and the (not especially well publicized) 100,000 mile extended transmission warranty. As we approached 90,000 miles on the Odyssey, I started driving it hard in the hope that I could encourage the transmission to fail within the warranty period. Success! At 97,000 miles the trouble lights came on and our friendly local dealer replaced the transmission with a factory-rebuilt unit in a smooth, hassle-free transaction.
I felt bad for a co-worker with a similar Odyssey who experienced transmission failure at 110,000 miles while on an extended vacation with his family. They wound up buying a new car – 1000 miles from home – due to the high cost and time required to repair/replace the transmission.
At the end of the 2007 model year, Honda was secretly offering huge discounts on leftover ’07 Odysseys. We already had 135,000 miles on the ’01, so I pulled the trigger. The 2007 Odyssey was better in every way.
Our only child was born in 2002 and we have never had a minivan. However, it could be argued we outdid most with our full-size Ford E-150. It is now 22 years old and I am considering minivans at some point in the future. I don’t care to buy anything right now.
Plus, after having that Ford van for a dozen years, minivans seem so cramped!
A friend of my wife’s had a newer Odyssey we rode in once. It was quite nice but was totaled by an errant driver before it was too old.
My daughter has watched a lot of Magic School Bus. Also featured on the show was the guy who played Theo Huxtable on the Cosby Show and Dolly Parton was featured on at least one episode. If memory serves, she played some down-home character.
The gen1 Odyessey was essentially an Accord with a tall wagon body. But the gen2 was of course a totally new platform, and what a successful one it turned out to be, as it has been the basis for all of Honda NA’s larger vehicles: the Pilot, Ridgeline, Passport and of course the Acura MDX. Maybe I’m missing someone.
This platform was created specifically for the NA market, and it has been a key to their success here.
I can’t quite work out if the non-US “skinny” Accords and Odysseys were the same basic unit minus inches hither and yon. The one I had (2nd gen non-US, about an ’02) could be had with the V6, for example.
I don’t know, and can’t find, if this sort of platform stretchiness was even a thing at that time, though there were, again for example, certainly skinny Previas outside America. The first I can recall hearing about stretching and shrinking platforms like rolled dough was from VW, later than this.
First paragraph from Wikipedia on the international version of the Odyssey:
In late 1999, a new, larger second generation Odyssey appeared in Japan and Australia and in a left-hand drive (LHD) format for China. However, this new Odyssey was a major upgrade of the first generation Odyssey rather than a completely new model. As a result, its overall shape and appearance were similar to the first generation Odyssey. Still, it was 85 mm (3.3 in) longer and 10 mm (0.4 in) wider than the previous model. While base models had slightly smaller dimensions and a smaller 2.3L engine, models with more options as well those with the 3.0L V6 engine featured slightly larger bumpers and chrome inserts, larger grille as well as a unique chrome number plate surround.
Same 2830mm wheelbase as the gen1, just a revised body and the availability of the V6. So still Accord-based. Not related to the NA Odyssey, which was not built or sold elsewhere. Later international versions were also unique from NA versions.
I read that and just assumed the international description was the base for the US stretchy, but that may well not be so. We did get the MDX later, and it was noticeably huge, especially for a Honda (and much criticized for ordinary dynamics and excess weight).
So it’s likely the entire screed I made above about the wonders of Odyssey ownership likely has nothing to do with the vehicle subject of the post!
Sorry about that, Chief.
I understand. And there’s bad information on Wikipedia about the NA Odyssey, saying (correctly) that its platform s related to the Pilot and MDX, but incorrectly also the Accord.
Honda had to create a new platform for this much larger and heavier NA Odyssey, and the Pilot/MDX/Rdgeline that followed. Might there be a few Accord genes in it? Very possibly. But it really is essentially a different platform, in the most common use of that term, meaning shared key chassis/suspension/brake/and other related key elements.
And FWIW, this platform has always been highly regarded for its dynamic and other qualities. All of the vehicles built on it have been class leaders, or very close to that. I’ve driven an MDX, and for that size and weight of vehicle, I was quite impressed. But yes, compared to the more typical smaller/lighter vehicles over your way, it probably felt a bit…much. But that’s exactly how a huge segment of Americans likes their cars. And these are tailored for Americans.
Enjoyable article, and a great ode to a minivan.
We reached Minivan Status a decade later than you — deciding, shortly after our second daughter was born, that even though we dreaded succumbing to The Minivan, it was a sensible choice. I don’t regret that choice a bit.
Our Odyssey is a 2010 (last year for the 3rd generation, and thankfully after the transmission issue had been resolved). For the price of these vans, no other vehicle matches its combination of cargo-carrying and comfort. And we take several long distance (1,000+ mi.) trips per year. The Odyssey has served us well… not quite a trouble-free as I had hoped for, but looking back now after 12 years and almost 150,000 miles, I really can’t complain.
In 2018 we bought a second minivan, a Kia Sedona, which now serves as our main trip vehicle, while the Odyssey is now my daily driver. Just this weekend, however, we took the Odyssey for a long weekend trip to a West Virginia State Park (pic below) — it was the first roadtrip for this van in quite some time. It’s satisfying to say after so many miles and years that we made a good choice in a vehicle.
I’ve got a 2010 as well, an EX-L model with leather and have put on the same mileage. It’s been a great van – great handling, smooth on the highway and more composed than my brother’s similar-era Sienna.
It followed our 1st-Gen ’98, and took my 3 kids through their teen years with many long road trips and vacations. I’ve frequently taken the middle row seats out to use it as a maximum hauler. We’re hanging on to it as long as we can, until we’re empty nesters, and will then move to a smaller.
We have had our 2007 Odyssey for 12 years. 215K miles and no end in sight due to the shortage of vehicles on the market. It has had it’s share of repairs but nothing too major. Many sets of brake pads, power steering pump, starter, front wheel bearings, two scheduled timing belt replacements, one ball joint. I have done much of the work myself or taken it to our trusted independent mechanic which has kept the cost reasonable.
We are soon to be empty nesters and I think we will be buying another minivan when sanity returns to the car market. There is just no more versatile vehicle for the money.
The reason minivans are out of style today is simply parents are having fewer kids cuz $$$. Before I had 3 my grand marquis was our family car that took us everywhere and it did the job perfectly. A crv or rav4 coulda done the job as well. Most parents only have 2 or just 1 kid now and dont need a minivan where as when I was growing up when minivans were the rage it was 3 and 4 kid families.
Gaaaaah!!! No fair! In my 3-litre ’07 Accord I was overjoyed to get 24 miles per U.S. gallon on a recent road trip involving about 5 hours at between 45 and 55 mph. Add in any city driving or higher speeds, and I have good reason to gripe. I’d be tickled with 19 to 20 in mixed driving!
My Dad purchased a white 2000 Odyssey for my stepmom (or rather, used his credit to buy her one) at Goodson Honday outside Houston Texas to replace her 93 Taurus that was flooded out in a hurricane.
The AC was powerful, and the trans was rebuilt under warranty as it had the V6. She got it in their divorce 12 years (and over 150k miles) later, trans issues aside.
Reliable, but boring inside and out. The grey mouse fur seats held up well enough.