“If you look for perfection, you’ll never be content.”
― Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina
By now, my COALs will be hitting somewhat of a tick-tock cadence – A new car for me, followed by a new car for my lovely wife Kristen.
As I mentioned in my previous COAL, I had soft-landed my career from the detritus of the dot-bomb explosion at Stylin Concepts, and we were living in a three bedroom cluster home we had built in 1999. While it seemed like a good idea at the time, in retrospect it was probably the biggest blunder of my life.
Not having any kids when we built it, I overlooked the kind of things that quickly become essential when raising a family: A backyard, a guest bedroom for visiting relatives providing free babysitting, and most of all, lots of space.
I miscalculated on all fronts: My line of work (IT consulting) pretty much mandates a home office, so my three-bedroom house was effectively down to two. And with child #2 on the way, I reluctantly found myself back in the housing market after little more than two years.
Learning from our previous mistakes, Kristen and I built a four-bedroom house that we hoped would meet our needs for the foreseeable future. A bedroom for each kid, plus an office for me. A three-car garage, even though we only had two at the time ( I would get around to filling it later). I had the builder put in rough plumbing for a bathroom and wet bar in the basement, since I was planning on finishing the basement at some point.
We tried to think of everything, and I think we did: we still live in this same house 15 years later.
With the housing situation taken care of, it was time to get back to the cars. While Kristen’s previous car was fine, I always felt that I could do better (recall my quest for automotive perfection in the 1990’s). My love affair with Honda/Acura had never really cooled, and with a brand new for 2003 body style the Honda Accord seemed like a perfect (pun intended) choice.
The seventh-generation North American Accord represented a major new styling direction by Honda. To be honest, I wasn’t wild about it, as it was a pretty big departure from the themes that Honda had been using for decades to great success. The nose was droopy, and the rear end made the back of the car look for all the world like a Buick. Apparently Honda agreed, as they reverted to more traditional rear-end styling after the 2006 mid-cycle refresh.
While the styling might have been questionable, everything else was flawless. The 3.0-liter V6 was a jewel: It put out an ample 240 hp, and had that unique Honda quality of sounding far more expensive than it was. The 5-speed automatic was smooth shifting, unobtrusive, and was always in the right gear. It had perfectly sized alloy wheels that provided the perfect balance of ride and handling. The heated leather seats were supportive and comfortable. This car also served as my first introduction to the joys of dual-zone climate control, which was much appreciated, as Kristen and I like to keep the temperature at different extremes.
I don’t really have much bad to say about the Accord. In fact, I can’t really think of anything bad at all to say. It was exceptionally competent, spacious, comfortable, and engaging. In fact, it was, dare I say, darn near perfect.
Honda Accords make great cars, but apparently they make lousy COALs.
As you can see, one overarching theme in my life has been a Quixotic search for automotive perfection. Indeed, I didn’t even realize it until I started penning this series many moons ago. After searching for perfection for years before finally finding it at the Audi dealership, who know that it was available all along at your closest Honda dealership (at about half the price, to boot)? As Homer Simpson would say, D’oh!
So now that I have obtained automotive perfection for the second time in my life, I must take some time for reflection. The 2003 Accord may have been one of the most perfect cars I ever owned, but it was not the most memorable, or even the most enjoyable. So what exactly makes a perfect car? Is perfection even desirable?
Case in point: why would someone want a painting when a photograph does a much better job of capturing an image? Take the example above: On the right, Vincent Van Gogh’s famous painting Church at Auvers. On the left, a photograph of the same building from roughly the same angle. The photograph inarguably has more detail and accuracy and is generally a more perfect representation of the building than the Van Gogh. Yet one is a priceless work of art, and the other is a worthless snapshot.
Maybe perfection is more than simply fidelity? Maybe there is something to this elusive quality of “character” after all? As a technophile, I always mocked people who prefer the “warmth” of LP records over CDs, but maybe they are on to something after all?
I am reminded of the comment storm I started a few months back in a CC Capsule I wrote where I dare suggested that a 1977 Trans Am was no faster to 60 than a modern Prius. Paul quickly produced a 1977 Car & Driver road test confirming the 9.3 second 0-60 time, on par with a Prius, pretty much settling the issue.
Or did it? Even if the holy grail of 1970’s cars, the 1977 Trans Am, is no quicker than a Prius, so what? Given the choice between the two, I would take the TA over the Prius in a heartbeat. I’m sure most readers of this blog would. Perhaps there is more to this perfection business than meets the eye.
Enough philosophy, and back to the Accord. It is said that only the good die young (or sung as in the case of Billy Joel), and such was the case with our perfect 2003 Accord.
While driving the Accord home from a Christmas party in December of 2005, Kristen came up behind a vehicle that was stopped at a green light in an intersection. While sitting there for a few beats trying to figure out what to do, she was smashed from behind by another driver who apparently was focusing only on the green light and somehow did not notice the other two vehicles stopped at the intersection. The Accord was then shoved into the stopped car in front of her, effectively making here the meat in a three-car pileup sandwich.
Luckily no one was severely injured. Kristen walked away with a sore neck and some bone spurs. The Accord, on the other hand, was toast. So now we were down a vehicle, and need to replace it fast. What did we replace it with? The answer, next week, will certainly surprise you!
I hear you when it comes for perfection searching. I just turned 40. In the 24 years I have been a driver, I have owned 25 plus cars. Daily drivers and classics.
Classics aside, I have seen it all. My first car was an 84 Buick Regal. No AC and a rebuilt tranny. I ended up driving it for almost five flawless years (mechanically). Since then, I tried to hold he flag for American cars, and got burned too many times. I had a 2000 Taurus for a few years of worry free miles, but that darn rear-end sag was always on the back of my mind. Traded it in on the family minivan. Then, it was a 2002 Camry for over 11 years. It was again a mehanially perfect car.
Now, I am a 2017Jetta owner. I no longer have the fire in my belly for the hunt. I am content with my two vehicles, also owning a 1979 Chrysler Córdoba. Who know if my tastes and drive will change. But for now, I’m feeling a lot like you. Thanks for the post.
Tom, I can relate. My next COAL article (coming soon!) follows a similar theme, wherein I found a car that seemed to tick all the right boxes and yet I never truly connected with it.
Yes, automotive perfection can be somewhat boring.
I feel the same about my ex 2011 Toyota Camry. It did everything as expected, did it well and unobtrusively. And did it…well…boringly.
Having owned a very similar vehicle in my 2010 Acura TSX, I can concur with your assessment that these cars are very well balanced all around, making them very easy and enjoyable cars to live with.
Your analogies about the Van Gogh painting versus the photograph and the Trans Am versus the Prius are spot on. There’s a lot to be said about the power of emotion and character versus practicality.
Sometimes the most feature-packed car might seem like the smarter choice, but what if a slightly more expensive car offers much more driving enjoyment instead of extra tech features?
I enjoy everyone’s writing and stories immensely, but I’m a dope.
What does COAL stand for?
Cars of a Lifetime
Cars of a Lifetime (COAL)
Perfect, thanks!
The mid cycle refresh for this generation Accord came in 2006 not 2005. 2005 brought all red full length taillights (like the 85 Buick LeSabre). I had an 05 Accord. You are correct, this generation Accord was very refned and smooth. My COAL is below:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cars-of-a-lifetime/coal-2005-honda-accord-and-2002-subaru-forester-the-game-changers/
Someone managed to buy a 2005 American Spec new and import it to Portugal…
Damn I couldn’t believe that was a mid size… It’s nearly as big as a Volvo S80… But it looks good and makes for a nice head turner here. It has the full width tails too.
2005 had all-red full-width taillights. Not sure if they were swapped for 2003-2004 version during the importation (for the mandated amber turn signals)
I am glad to read that your wife did not get hurt too bad in this wreck. I am sure it made this Christmas a memorable one for the wrong reasons. This car indeed was perfect. Even the crumble zones did their job front and back.
One thing though about a boring perfect family vehicle: the one period in life when you need a vehicle like that is with young and growing children. That appliance makes life soo much easier when your schedule is booked twice over.
The full width taillights suit the rear so much better than the Merc-style 2006 ones…
Why did you get another Accord after that one died?
I struggled with the same issues on our 2012 Accord EXL. But I paid it off 2 years ago and love its low operating costs and overall driving enjoyment (here in Idaho). It’ll be a good car for the boys (currently 6 and 10) someday.
Ah, I see we have found another believer in the Honda V6. Welcome Brother.
A simple upgrade up to Acura might have solved your quest for perfection. You satisfy your love for Honda products; you get a reliable, sensible machine; and you get at least a little more passion and emotion. Speaking from experience.
Hmm… I think I’d prefer the photo. But I’d take architecture over art any day. Architecture is art.
Toyota, and specifically the Camry, are often derided as being the epitome of boring, but I guess my love of Hondas has blinded me to the fact that they, too, are often boring cars.
As far as the 2003 Accord goes, I agree with your assessment of the styling. Front end does look droopy, but I like it because it’s a different look. And I was never crazy about either version of the tail lights. The 2003-2005 lights look very similar to those used on 90-93 Accord…but they look like they are upside down and mounted a tad too close to the bottom of the car. The later tail lights look like they are bigger than they need to be.
I like that size of car, too, but it seems the Civic sedan is now that size (not sure that’s actually true, or not) and wish the V6 and manual transmission combination was more widely available….and I could afford one.
I have a ’17 Camry Hybrid. While it certainly isn’t exciting, it’s not exactly boring either. As was mentioned in the Prius/TA comparison in the article, I am still stunned at the acceleration when I need to pass – there is a lag while the engine and motor get in sync, but when they do…hang on! Puts a grin on my face every time, especially with 40+ MPG.
Although I was saddened to read of the untimely demise of your Accord, its early death likely saved you the trouble of having to deal with premature failure of the fragile transmission V-6 Accords were saddled with. The reliability of those 5-speed autos was rather abysmal in 2003 &2004, thought it improved markedly after that.
Now that you mention it, I do recall (no pun intended) a recall to address an issue with the transmission. I believe it involved installing a magnetic drain plug, and maybe adjusting the oil spray pattern.
Sometimes you hit a stage in life where you really need a good appliance car. Adulthood means you don’t always get what you want. But those Accords, while common, gave you a lot of good stuff with the appliance.
A law partner couldn’t handle the anonymity of a V6 Accord coupe (even in red) and eventually ended up with the related Acura TL. It was an excellent car, other than the transmission replacement. Fortunately, he sprung for the extended warranty when he bought it.
I shuddered when I saw this car.
I bought my grandfather’s from his estate (my uncle sold it to us after my mother fronted the money, we were paying her bi-weekly) after he died. Low miles, pretty well maintained, good performance, I thought I was getting a great deal.
Then we drove it to Texas to see my in-laws and back to Pennsylvania, whereupon the transmission failed. I came to find out that this is a common problem with automatic transmissions of this vintage.
So, having little money and facing a replacement bill of $6000 quoted me by the local Honda dealer, I asked my mother what I should do. I knew what to do, I was simply asking her since she was the lien holder, as it were. She told me to shop around for a new car, but if it had to happen she would foot a new transmission and we would simply add it to the loan.
What I haven’t mentioned yet: my mother would die of cancer in less than 3 months. My stepfather, who despises me, told me after she died that he thought I was asking her so I could “rip her off one last time”.
So we traded it in, I was stuck with two payments for a while, I added yet another thing to the list of reasons why I haven’t spoken to my stepfather in 6 months, and I was given a memory I’d sooner forget, returning vividly every time I see one of these.
But I digress. Nice ride.
Honda would also warranty these repairs.
There is perfection, and then there is white bread.
And all too often (most of the time?) to get the former, you end up with the latter. I have never had the slightest desire to own a Honda Accord. Or a Toyota Camry. Or any other car of their ilk: Mechanically perfect, reliable to the point that the most cheap-ass-bastard curmudgeonly auto blogger would (begrudgingly, after nitpicking the hell out of it on all sorts of utterly ridiculous matters) admit it was a good car – and try to buy one used for at least 15% under honest market value.
I demand “soul” in a car. That undefinable characteristic that smilingly allows one to put up with two or three major repairs a year, just because there’s something about that car that makes you FEEL GOOD about getting into it every morning. Something that cheap operating costs and perfect reliability cannot possibly replace.
Which makes me the kind of person who would happily own a Renault or Citroen if they were available in the US; an Alfa Romeo Guiletta if I could afford it (and it is on my list as a used car 3-5 year from now). And, for the moment, I find my Fiat to be the perfect ride.
The day I’m happy driving a Honda Accord, especially if it has an automatic, please take me out back and shoot me. Because a 63 year love of the automobile has died. And I’m now willing to live with four wheeled transportation white bread.
Soul == Multiple magazines could not finish testing brand new (presumably hand-picked and prepped) Alfa Romeo Giulias without breakdown or dealer visits (Car & Driver judged it #1 in a six-car comparison despite repeated malfunctions, soulful indeed). And FIAT ranks at or near dead last in all reliability surveys, while its chronically money losing European operation is being propped up by Chrysler/Jeep.
That’s not soul. That’s just sheer incompetence.
Yeah, but when finances are tight, even 1 major repair every odd year isn’t worth it.
Passion and reliability are not enemies, we can have both. We just need to find the ones with balance.
You mean a Giulia?
This is a Giulietta
You’re talk of trying to find perfection from an objective standpoint and being unsatisfied is one that we here at CC can truly understand. Too often, when you try to go for something objectively perfect, you end up with something boring. You manage to be happier with something more flawed that satisfies your desires. The quote I’ll always remember is from Regular Car Reviews Ducati 900 SS CR video when he quotes Bicentennial Man and says “Perfection lies in imperfection.” I don’t necessarily disagree with that assessment. That’s why me and my dad bought my Eldorado, I knew it was flawed, but I was happy with it. Of course, now that car has become a symbol of regret and I’ve grown to loathe it. But, when I eventually replace it, with a four door sedan, I still want a sedan that can put a smile on my face and satisfy me, even if it isn’t perfect or flawless the way that a Honda Accord or a Toyota Camry is.
Automotive enthusiasts are one of the few groups of people I’ve come across that consistently think with their hearts more than their brains. But, when you have that much passion for something (or someone in some cases), you’re willing to put up with a lot if the end result makes you happy.
Nice house. What’s that white stuff all over the ground?
Looks like your boys have a car with passion and soul!
I bought an 08′ Accord once in a weak moment of rational, logical, clear headed Mr. Spock-like thinking. 4 doors. EX trim. White. 4 banger. Named it Moby, the great white Honda. Very much felt like I was finally running with the pack, which was a nice kind of feeling. It seemed kinda perfect.
The thing that saved Moby from total perfection, however, was the 5 speed connected to the third pedal. That and the fact that he didn’t want to be a manual trans car and was quite upset about it. Worst shifting manual tranny I’ve ever experienced, just awful, my 60′ Bel Air shifted better.
Two years in Honda had to rebuild that tranny on their dime, took them a week to figure out how to do it, probably had to fly in the engineer from Tokyo, and of course it was only marginally better once they returned it. At least it quit grinding in third. But Moby was nicely washed and cleaned when we picked him up. Very Honda like. Somewhere Mr. Spock raised an eyebrow in approval.
1960 Bel Air “three-on-the-tree” shifted better than a 2008 Accord with 5-on-the-floor? Really? Honda manual transmissions are usually ranked along with Mazda’s as best in class. Not surprisingly they are the only automakers still offering manual transmission in mid-size family sedans in the US.
Yup. Note that Honda had to rebuild it when it was only two years old to try to fix the crappy shifting, particularly the grinding going into third.
That was after they’d tried to convince me that it was “normal” doing that. Uh, nope, not normal.
Still never shifted right. Honda made great manuals back in the day, but my car wasn’t one of them.
Moby had a lot of problems. Orange peel paint. Splitting weatherstrip. Flaking chrome. Crappiest transmission in the West.
My how the mighty have fallen. Honda and Toyota still make great cars, but they do have their share of issues that at one time was unheard of with the brands.
I have a 2003 Accord LX like this, but with a 4-cylinder in Eternal Blue. It has served me very well and has gotten me to work, weekend trips and shopping errands reliably without incident. After renting cars like the Ford Fusion, Toyota Camry, Dodge Charger, Chevy Cruze, Ford Focus, Chevy Camaro, Ford Mustang and so on, I’ve come to appreciate the visibility from inside the car. The window sill is reasonably low and the trunk height is not too high, contributing to good outward visibility. The windshield is expansive with a dashboard that slopes downward, and is like a movie screen compared to the cars I’ve rented which have high dashboards and narrower windows. I also appreciate that the large speedometer is centered in the middle of the instrument cluster with legible white on black with legible fonts. The steering has some firmness to it and is not over-boosted like many newer cars. At 14 years and 170K miles, I’ve had to get the water pump, mass airflow sensor motor and bushings in the control arms replaced but I plan to keep the car running due to low insurance costs and the fact that most mechanics can fix it with readily available parts. I am heartened to hear that your wife emerged unscathed from the rear end collision. If my car were to be involved in a similar accident, I plan to get a white VW Jetta S like Marlon.
Accord dashboards have always been a model of simplicity – easy to read, high communicative. Everyone should have to start with an Accord dashboard and then feel free to riff on it to a limitation.
Not crazy about the former Civic bi-level, and the new Civic and CR-V dashboards. They’re trying to be stylin’. Stop it.
Eternal Blue? What a bizarre name for a colour…
Color names are frequently very odd. For every name that has a certain poetry, there are three or four that are really quite strange, especially if you have non-English-speakers at it.
The back of these looked like copy of 1996 Buick Regal sedan. No doubt to get older buyers.
It irks me when people put the Camry and Accord in the same grouping as far as excitement is concerned. I think the Camry brings the Accord down! It is the fact that the Accord can be a family car AND a driver’s car, something most mid-sized sedans lack. The Accord has an intrinsic goodness to it that the Camry doesn’t. And I am not talking about reliability. For the same reason Car and Driver has had the Accord on their 10 Best List for what, 30+ years now? Having owned many Accords I fully concur with C&D. A Japanese sedan will be reliable, but will it make us smile when we have to take that long route home? My Accords always made me feel like driving. And I’ve driven plenty of Camry’s too – my sister owned 2 of them so I can attest to how they feel. NUMB is the word that comes to mind. I have never felt that way in an Accord, and I think it has won so many 10 Best awards because C&D feels exactly the same way.
I have almost the same car lx v6 4-door. It was my first band new vehicle and I brought the car as first model year. It served me well over 13 years, but no without problems free. Beside the infamous Honda transmission with its v6 enigine which is a constant worry during my ownership – I was lucky transmission hold up well up to 110k miles before I sold to the neighbor, he used the car now. I also went through three rear brake calipers(two cases the rear brake calipers seized, one case the after market caliper did not hold up after 15k miles and had to change with, two rear wheel bearings (they probably burnt up when the calipers seized), the power steering pump bearing noise and alternator bearing noise. The power steering hose leaked at the clipping area, I asked Honda to replace under my purchased extended warranty, it refused and said the warranty did not cover the rubber part, I ended up to buy the hose and have my mechanic friend replaced. But much later Honda had the recall on this part.
This car wore up the rear brake pads faster than front pads. In my case, the rear pads went out at the rate of three times faster. I believe this was caused by the design of the BEDC (Brake Effect Distrubtion Control). Honda offered recall on the similar vintage of Acura TL, but on the six cylinders Honda.
I choose this car over Toyota Camry, Nissan Alitma and VW Passat. It handled better than first two but not Passat, which was very good on almost all aspects except the engine had half second delay to respond to gas pedal input. And I am certain Passat would not be reliable as Accord.