Much has been written on the steadfast Honda Accord, from its humble beginnings and on through its continual refinement. Its staying power as a reliable constant in the ever-shifting automotive landscape, often in close contention with its eternal sparring partner the Toyota Camry, has helped cement its place as one of America’s most enduring mid-size sedans even while the shadow of crossovers and SUVs grows increasingly long. In production for over 40 years, it’s certainly built a legacy for itself as practical, reliable transportation.
But adjectives like “high-performing” or “muscular” were never ones that many would use to describe their humble people-moving Accord. Enter: the V6+6MT Accord. For this example, we’ll be looking at a 4-door sedan version of this combination, which happens to be my daily driver, weirdly enough!
I think it’s safe to say that the 7th generation Accord was more evolutionary than revolutionary. The inaugural 2003 model grew by a few inches in both length and width – from a 104.9 inch wheelbase to 107.9 inches for the sedan, with even the new coupe model elongating slightly to 105.1 inches. Width similarly increased slightly for both sedan and coupe variants, up to 71.5 inches for the sedan and 71.3 for the coupe. Interior space in my experience has been more than adequate, even with 4 adults.
While the majority of 7th generation Accords were powered by various versions of Honda’s K series inline 4 cylinder engine, the J series SOHC V6 first seen on the 6th generation Accord and Acura TL a few years earlier was also on offer, paired either to a 5 speed automatic or a 6 speed manual transmission. Initially, V6 4-door models were only mated to the 5 speed automatic (the 6 speed was exclusive to the V6-equipped coupe), but starting in 2006 buyers looking for a more traditional number of doors on their Accord were able to option the V6 together with the Acura-derived 6 speed stick. Power for both engine options was competitive – 161 horsepower and 160 pound-feet of torque for the four-popper in 2003 (later bumped up to 166 horses for the ’05-’07 models) while the V6 sought to put some spice in middle America’s daily commute with 240 horsepower and 212 pound feet of torque on tap, those figures being boosted to 244 horses and 211 pound-feet of torque for 2006-2007 models. These power figures were certainly competitive at the time, practically in lockstep with the current generation of Camry and Impala while trailing a bit behind the Altima.
Exterior styling is always a matter of preference, but I believe the ’06-’07 facelift is the best looking design of this particular generation, especially with the replacement of that nasty horizontal taillight bar with the more angular, almost LED-patterned red lights and those dual chrome exhaust tips – distinctive and sporty without being too “boy-racer”. The front end was a recognizable and attractive piece of work from the beginning of the 7th generation, or so it seems it was to Honda as it remained basically unchanged for the entire run.
The situation on the inside was typical Honda fare: intuitive center-stack design and large knobs for HVAC and radio control. There’s a typical mid-2000s level of economy car oeuvre to be found in the cabin – no stitched-leather upper dash or wood paneling in sight, but build quality in my experience has been quite solid and the near-lux features like heated seats on my top end EX-L trim has certainly been appreciated by this author during chilly Michigan winters.
Considering the EX-L’s 244 horsepower comes down solely through the front wheels, I’m curious to hear what others think of the driving experience. Personally this is the most powerful car I’ve owned, and while it definitely is a bit front heavy, and torque steer is a regular occurrence, I really enjoy it and feel like the car has a personality that I appreciate. The interior is roomy and well put together, there’s ample room in the trunk, and that supremely solid-feeling Honda stick shift has gotten praise from both of my parents whose previous experiences with manual transmissions were in late 80’s Toyota pickups or early 00’s Hyundai econoboxes.
While it’s safe to assume a solid portion of V6-powered Accords were sold during the course of its 7th generation, pinning down exactly how many V6 sedans with the 6 speed manual transmission made their way off dealer lots is a bit tricky, as exact production numbers have never been released to my knowledge. Grabbing some rough figures off the web and doing some bar napkin math gives the impression that this variant of Accord is actually quite rare – I would be surprised if more than 10,000 of these cars were sold total, and who knows how many managed to make it to their 14th or 15th (for the 2007 models) birthday.
Forever doomed to an increasingly small slice of the Accord sales pie, the V6/6MT Accord combo continued to be supported by Honda for quite a while, culminating in the 2012 9th generation’s final iteration of this venerable performer with its V6 engine having sprouted an additional 0.5 liters since 2007. Pumping out a solid 278 horsepower and 252 pound-feet of torque, this seems to have been the final Accord available with 6 cylinders as the current model’s optional mill is a domesticated version of the Civic Type-R’s turbocharged 4 popper – the steadfast 6 speed manual was dropped last year as well, due to lack of sales of both the Accord in particular and mid-size sedans in general.
Certainly no one would accuse the V6 Accord of being some sleeper performance gem, but its attractive combo platter of affordability, reliability, and performance options in the form of the aforementioned V6 and 6 speed transmission made for an interesting beast in the market that I struggle to draw comparisons to – V6s at the Accord’s power range were certainly nothing special at the time of its release, but the optional stick shift is only matched by the Altima as far as I know. In any case, I think it’s an interesting piece of history as naturally aspirated engines continue to get squeezed out of the game and manual transmissions increasingly become an expensive novelty reserved only for dedicated performance vehicles.
Love the TL wheels all V6s got, and that the V6 6-speeds could be identified from the outside by the red V6 badge on the trunk.
Credit to early Doug Demuro for this trivia.
“Honda Accord V6 Manual Sedan Minutiae”
http://playswithcars.com/?p=643
Wow, I have no idea how, but the fact that the V6 ever came with a stick escaped me completely. I always knew that there was a manual Accord available (for the dwindling number of people who want three pedals) but thought that it was restricted to the 4 cylinder cars. But now that I know this I want one!
That has been the one hole in my automotive ownership experience – a manual transmission bolted to an engine that puts out enough power and torque that an automatic would be perfectly fine with it. In other words, a car where you get the stick because you want to, not because the alternative of an automatic would be unpleasant.
The old V6 SHO’s would qualify, although the automatic had a 3.2l V6 vs the 3.0l V6 in the manual versions.
To me the V6 with manual combo was offered only on the Accord Coupe, didn’t know about the sedan
that was .the last V6/MT Accord, which was replaced in the current generation with a four door sedan with the 2.0T and a 6 speed manual, but that combo was quietly retired partway into the second model year.
In 1998 when I bought my ’99 Accord Coupe it was still either 4/MT or 6/AT. Wish I would have done the MT, even though it was dog slow.
I’m still regretting that I didn’t buy the V-6 6MT Accord coupe before it was discontinued, instead of my 5 spd/MT Fit Sport. Trying to find one nowadays is like looking for hen’s teeth! *SIGH*
The 2010-2014 Acura TL had a 6speed manual option in the AWD as well. So you can add a unicorn to your search for hen’s teeth 🙂
Have spent many miles behind the wheel of V6 6-speed Sedan, it was so smooth and torquey that you could go with just even (or odd) numbered gears when you wished.
Right on! Glad to see another V6/6MT Sedan out there.
I also didn’t realize the V6 sedan of this generation was available with the 6-speed, thought it was only on the V6 coupe, and of course the 4-cylinders. It seems like in the 2000’s a few automakers attempted to offer manual transmissions again in more of their midsize cars, even with the V6 models; more so than in the late-90’s models they replaced. Besides the Accord, you had the Stratus Coupe versus the Avenger coupe, or even the Pontiac G6 GTP versus the Grand Am. But alas, the public didn’t bite.
Glad to see you enjoying a rare, fun to drive variant of an otherwise pedestrian car. Thanks for sharing.
Nice review It’s irrelevant for the market but a shame nonetheless that this powertrain format no longer exists. I think this Accord could hit nearly 100 at the quarter mile with the stick…and it debuted in 2003 when that was really something. Stick shifts continued in V6 accords until 2017, but coupe only, and that’s a piece of spicy commuter history to pick up if you have the chance. Most accounts of the 2018-2020 Accord stick shift are quite bleak, with lots of rev hang, and a sloppy feeling shifter. Seems Honda phoned it in for the final run and the magic ended in ’17.
I’ve heard some mixed reviews of the current generation Accord stick shift as well! I’d love to test drive one just to see if the internet opinions are on point.
Interesting car though they seem to be common enough I see plenty of them but with a manual box not very common here nobody seems to know how to operate one.
Didn’t know the V6/manual was a combo in the Accord.
I once owned a Contour Sport with a 5-speed manual and V6 and really enjoyed the car both around town and on the highway. 200 plus horsepower would provide plenty of oomph as I found out in the Contour. I’d love to have a V6/manual gearbox again in a sedan, but that’s not likely to happen at this point in time.
I was thinking the same thing — I owned a Contour SVT (also V6 and manual), for 10 years, and I loved it. For me it was the perfect combination of size and performance, and I’d love to buy such a package again.
I also remember test-driving a 2010 (or so) Camry with a 6-spd. manual and thought it was a very enjoyable car to drive. But the percentage of people who would be interested in a stick shift sedan was quickly decreasing to near zero, even when this featured Accord was built. Too bad.
The Mazda 6 also offered a stick with its V6 until 2009 (though the engine, with only 212 hp, was down on power and refinement compared to the Accord and Altima). The Mazda was further unique because until ’08 you could also spec it as a hatchback or wagon with the V6/5spd combo.
I drive an ’07 V6/5AT. It’s dependable transport, and I find almost everything else about it severely disagreeable; I’ll rant about it at great length when its turn comes in my forthcoming COAL series. A manual transmission would address one of my gripes, but the list would still be very long.
One thing, though:
What’s the “almost”? The brake/tail lights are LEDs; a cluster of 15 of them plus one more for the side marker light. Only the turn signal, up at the top, is an incandescent bulb.
Looking forward to another take on these cars – personally I love my ’06 but considering my last car was a 2004 Elantra, the bar was pretty low. The taillight LED was a miss on my part, thanks for the clarification on that!
Welp…here it is!
You need to watch out the rear brake clipper, both rear brake clippers of my 2003 V6 sedan with automatic transmission failed after less than 10 years with less than 80k miles. Note my model didn’t not have stability control like yours. In my view, my problem was due to Honda design, its bake distribution module is the cause, the similar unit was recalled in this vintage of Acura TL sedan and coupe.
I have the 6sp/6cy altima sedan and its a wonderful daily driver getting 26mpg. Ill be sad when I have to give it up. My only complaint is how notchy the shifter is. Also, it is a pain to replace certain engine parts, but that is the nature of the transverse mounted V-engine. I have researched changing spark plugs, and it seems not very difficult. Eventually it will need a clutch one day as well. All that being said, i wish i could keep buying the car over & over but good luck finding one, honda or nissan .
Hell yeah man, those Nissan V6s sound amazing! I’d love to move up into a G37 someday but I’m not sure if it’d be enough of an upgrade to justify the cost.
I absolutely love my HONDA ACCORD EX-L V6 3.0. When I bought it it had 215,000 miles. Transmission was messed up. I put my baby brand new. New Transmission, waterpump, thermostat, breaks, sensors, tune-up, control arm and tie rods. My car has soooo much power im in love. I wouldn’t sell it for anything in the world. People drive next to me fast but my baby has no competition I smoked them. 😍 Honda Accord EX-L v6 3.0 is the best car I’ve owned.
I have a 2006 Honda Accord Ex-L sedan 3.0 V6 6 speed, has been a great car! Very quick for it’s size. It’s funny when you give it the beans and pull on some sport cars or your on their behind and they can’t pull away! Always a good time!
I have a 06 v6/6speed Accord and I love it I would never give this car up for anything. People see me in this car and don’t know its standard because it is super quiet but when I take off jaws drop
Ths car has such a good take off, I love smoking people at stop lights and also being a girl doesn’t mean we don’t know how to drive stick because I hate being judged because I am a female!
Still driving my 2006 Accord V6 EX 6sp MT. Best car I’ve ever owned. Maybe the best car I’ve ever driven. Reliable, quiet, fast and very, very comfortable. After 17 years and 165k+ miles it is still in good shape. The transmission is wonderful. I guess I’ll need a new clutch someday. All I could imagine replacing it with is a later year low miles V6 sp. But it is still going strong now. I would like to improve the handling a little, maybe ad bigger anti-roll bars. But I still love the car and enjoy driving it.
My 2007 6-6 sedans got 178,000 miles on original clutch, I’ve had it since new.