One of the drawbacks to fleet old car ownership is space; I only have room at home for four old cars, which means that three are always in storage. Therefore, every time one is dismantled at home, there is room for one less available car to drive; and since I love to drive old cars, that makes me sad. To assuage the malaise, I try every summer to do jobs that won’t take too long, saving the tasks that are wider in scope for our endlessly cold Michigan winters. Last summer, I finally put the stalwart Skylark on the list for some deferred maintenance. As it always does, hilarity ensued.
The first job of several was to do something about this passenger side inner wheelhouse. The battery had long ago rotted it, and this artistically destructive rust formation was part of the meager purchase price back in 2003. It was barely visible inside the engine compartment, so I never thought much about it. If my Skylark were a well-restored local show contender, I would have found a used wheelhouse, but since the car sports ancient lacquer paint with dings and scars too numerous to count, I dug into my sheet metal pile and gave it hell.
I spent an afternoon bending and hammering some sheetmetal to fix the rust. Normally, I would use some fiberglass filler to smooth out the repair, but since it’s almost completely hidden by the battery box, I ground the welds and covered it with some black paint.
When this was done, I decided to remove the fender and realign it, as the back edge has never aligned with the door properly. I soon discovered why nothing was done about this: the lower fender bolt was rusted into the cowl. If you’ve ever dealt with this problem, you may know that the bolt is held in by a captured nut. This nut, when forced by a breaker bar or impact gun on a rusty nut, will immediately deform its cage and endlessly spin without ever coming loose. As an aside, please forgive my memory…I might be talking about my Firebird’s subframe mounts here. The Skylark’s captive nut may have been welded to the inner cowl, and the weld broke. I did both jobs last summer, and they were both pretty bad.
Needless to say, I needed to cut the bolt to remove the fender, and then I needed to fabricate something new with which to reattach it. My solution was to weld a nut to a piece of sheet metal with a hole large enough for a bolt to pass through it, and to weld the piece where the old welded/captured nut was. A picture would say a thousand words, but I don’t have one. The idea worked, but the fender still didn’t line up quite right. Judging by some other evidence, I feel like the car might have taken a hit on the passenger side at some point in its long history, causing this most recent of my many frustrations.
As you can see above, I also replaced the upper control arms, as the originals had worn out upper bushings. Normally, I would press out the bushings and install new ones, but 1965 Skylarks had one year only bushings that cost more than a whole new upper control arm for almost any other A-Body. Since the parts are interchangeable, I decided on new ones. Afterward, I did a front end alignment at home using tools from an outfit called Longacre Racing. It takes some time and patience, but I can usually dial in an alignment perfectly.
As I wrestled with the fender, a subpar repair I had performed early in my ownership experience cracked, meaning I had to do some patching.
So I reached out to the sheetmetal pile again…
And welded in a patch. Probably out of exasperation at this point, I didn’t take a picture of the finished product, which actually came out really well. The paint matched perfectly, and nobody would ever notice I was in there.
It’s tough to see the fender repair here, but this is the reassembled car last October.
After all that, there was another job on the list. I discovered a seeping head gasket on the passenger side, and had planned to only replace that gasket. Unfortunately, I also discovered that someone had installed steel shim head gaskets (without any sealer), and I planned to use thicker composite gaskets. Therefore, to ensure even compression on both banks, I had to replace the driver’s side gasket as well (on which a previous mechanic HAD used sealer, and which was NOT leaking).
I cleaned both cylinder heads and checked for warpage; they were both BARELY within limits. Jobs like these tend to snowball. Since the car literally runs perfectly, and “just a head milling” turns into “cylinder head rebuilding” faster than you can pull out your credit card, I quickly reinstalled them before I changed my mind. Call me a hack mechanic if you want, but I’ve fixed what wasn’t broken plenty of times. Needless to say, I’ve driven the car at least 500 miles since this repair, and it still runs perfectly and doesn’t leak.
The only problem is a VERY slight lifter tick that I can only hear when the engine is idling inside the garage. Buick 300s do not have adjustable rocker arms, and the thicker head gaskets have altered the lifter adjustment depth. Longer pushrods would be the best answer, but Buick 300 pushrods are not easy to come by. Chances are, a little run time will quiet the lifter; if not, almost everything I own makes some strange noise. The quirks make the character.
These jobs took me about two weeks, and I finally finished just after Independence Day. I drove the car about 50 miles and immediately took it out to storage and picked up my Firebird. After wrestling with the Skylark as I did, a little time off was in order. I don’t think I drove it again for two months.
That’s the nice thing about having too many old cars. If one misbehaves, or if you simply get frustrated with it, you can always put it in “time out.”
Nice work Aaron! Your sheet metal work looks good to me, better than mine own skills (I have always been a mechanical guy). I know what you mean about the snowball effect, or project creep as I call it. At some point you have to draw the line, or the next thing you know your into a major restoration. I certainly don’t think you are a “hack mechanic” by any means. Back when these cars were on the road as regular drivers, most people would have done the same (or less) to get the car back on the road. The Buick looks great as is, and I am sure it’s a fun old driver. Coincidentally, the ’72 Skylark with a Buick 350 we had when I was a teenager had a lifter tick for much of it’s life.
I have to ask though, with 7 cars, what do you do for storage? I assume you must have a fairly large garage at home? I have a 900 square foot garage, but my wife’s car stays in there, and I also have my work shop, so it doesn’t leave much for my old cars. I am looking at investing in a 4-post lift for additional storage, since I have 12 foot ceilings (plus it’d be great for maintenance). I’d love to build a second garage on my property some day.
I have a four-car garage; the daily drivers stay in the driveway because my wife is a saint, and I rent a farmer’s old pole barn for the other three. I have to call a guy up to go switch cars, but he’s retired and lives across the street, so it’s a pretty easy affair…not optimal, but not bad.
Well done Aaron and great Skylark. 65’s have a clean look. I feel your pain and share the satisfaction of the inner fender repair. My 67 LeSabre had the same issue. I was able to use the remaining Swiss cheese sheet metal as a pattern. Since it had a curved channel a part of the original stamping I made a wood form and pounded the patch into it. Butt welded it and smoothed it over with LabMetal. Welded a nut to a washer and welded it to the patch for the support bracket. Came out great! Lucky for you they reproduce a battery box for A bodies. Mine is part lacework , part original black paint with no rust. Very odd. I’ll have to get creative with it
You do the kinds of jobs that I tell myself I would do….”if only I had the tools….”. But I know that tools access isn’t the problem, I just don’t have the ambition to stick with the job.
And I would agree, you are by no means a “hack mechanic”. If you fixed your cars until they were “as new”, or better, you would not have the time or money to enjoy them. You also would not have the 4 nice cars you have but would probably have 1-2 “trailer queens” that rarely get driven. And when you did get a chance to drive it/them you would worry about everything that could go wrong.
“I only have room at home for four old cars” – I’ll swap you any day. My car is stored 10 miles away – I live in an apartment and parking there means outside in the elements which here in Austria is a definite no-no. I can use my friend’s garage but it has to be arranged in advance. As for having more than one old car, I have no idea where you guys with a fleet ever manage to get ANYTHING done, I have problems with the one car!
Agree with you totally on the repairs, this is my policy too – never do anything which means the car will not be derivable the whole summer is my motto. Yes, it means things will take longer but at least i get to enjoy the thing. Here is some of what I had to contend with during this winter (courtesy of the creature that used to live under the rear seat).
Don’t remember much about the Buick 300. Was that based on the Nailhead? Or something else?
Anyway, the 65 GS was always one of my favorite cars and I was always an Olds guy.
The Buick 300 is based on the aluminum 215, and has nothing in common with the Nailhead other than the shape of the valve covers. The later Buick 350 is based on the same engine, but was a pretty big revision.
I wound up “wiki ing” the 300. Now I know what you’re talking about! Thanks.
I’m trying to decide if the 1965 Buick (nice car you have by the way) looks in GM family resemblance to a 1965 Chev or a 1965 Pontiac. In the final determination, I find that it looks more like a 1966 Chev Impala, so it must have been a year ahead of itself with its front end styling. Very nicely done.
“Call me a hack mechanic if you want, but I’ve fixed what wasn’t broken plenty of times.”
You pick your battles, which usually means more time driving/less time fixing. It’s likely you’ll never again have a problem with those heads sealing.
Absolutely- Pick your battles!
There’s no room for an Obsessive approach to repairs, since outside of the rare exceptions (Shoebox Chevies and early Mustangs), you rarely find factory original parts, and most of the rebuild shops so common back in the sixties are history.
I love reading these. I get to vicariously experience the thrill of fixing things but stay warm and dry without band-aids on my fingers. 🙂 I still love this Buick, it reminds me of the 64 Cutlass I grew up in.
That “little” Buick 300 always mystified me when downmarket Oldsmobile gave buyers a standard 330 starting in 1964. In fact, only Chevrolet offered a smaller V8 in its 283 since Pontiac’s base V8 was a 326. That 215 seems to have backed Buick into multiple corners, saddling it (early on) with that paint-shaker 90 degree V6.
I am curious – with you being tri-lingual (GM, Ford, Chrysler) and having done substantial work on cars from all three companies, is there one of your 60s cars you prefer in terms of its engineering and construction philosophy? Most of us get pretty good with one thing and have little experience with much else. You have lived with them all and from similar eras.
That’s a great question, JP. I’ve often thought about who built the best old car, because they’ve all made me mad. I hate Ford shock towers, but other than that they’re pretty easy to work on and durable once you work your way through them. I don’t like Chrysler’s approach to the electrical system, with the bulkhead connectors pretty much hanging out on the firewall, but I’d rather remove a torsion bar than a coil spring. On the other hand, the lower control arm bushing is a bear to remove (although it would be easier the second time). After working on the Dart, I feel that Chrysler’s material quality was below the others, but that might just be because it’s a base Dart. The Corvair was too far ahead of its time; its materials weren’t up to current standards (aluminum), and there are FAR too many possible leak points, but that’s an outlier. The Skylark is well made, but has a flimsy frame (I can see the front end droop significantly when I jack it up).
They all have quirks, but I can’t say one is that much better than another.
I don’t like Chrysler’s approach to the electrical system, with the bulkhead connectors pretty much hanging out on the firewall,
I remember reading that those bulkhead connectors were the source of many Mopar electrical issues. The beancounters decreed they be made of cheap plastic that crumbled in a few years, and the wrong things started breaking, or making, contact.
My dad had a 69 Fury that would tend to confirm that theory. The fuel and temp gauge needles liked to swing back and forth in unison, until they quit entirely. Then there were the multiple cases of self-discharging batteries. Leave that car sitting for a few days, like in an airport parking lot, and he would need a jump.
That was the instrument panel voltage regulator going bad, Steve. It’s taken me five years to really get down to it, but I’ve finally started to sort out the Dirty Dart’s instrument cluster. So far, I’ve replaced a burned out gas gauge (burned wiring internally), and added a missing part or two. Now I have a working temp. gauge but no gas gauge (although I bench tested the new gas gauge and it was good). When the polar vortex lifts, it’s time to check for sender resistance. Let’s just say there seem to be several problems stacking up in the gas gauge department.
Nice work, Aaron! What I loved about this post was learning about this whole process. I know nothing about wrenching or body work, and so this was (in a way) better than watching it on PBS. Beautiful Skylark, too.
Thanks all…I’ve always enjoyed tinkering and I thought I’d share what I’ve been up to.
Only what, seven cars? Life is so simple.
Aaron
I wish that I had half of your skills in keeping my fleet going. Maybe Santa will put a pole barn under the tree this year!
Read your 3 posts and enjoyed, i have a 64 with the Rochester 4 barrel al heads and intake. i had my engine rebuilt but opted to go with lower compression ratio pistons and added a very mild cam. Ever since cannot get it to run correctly. I experience the heat problem as well and am having to run my timing well advanced of where it should be. I have an over sized radiator but not aluminum as i see you have, that may be my next change. See you are in Michigan I am also, west side of state. Would like to hear more of you diagnostics, if you would direct me to where you post, this just happened to be story that popped up on my phone yesterday. Thank you and good luck with all the other rolling stock.
Hi Mike,
The lower compression pistons were a good idea, I think. A guy on V8Buick.com wrote up a good “instruction manual” for setting timing. Here’s a link:
http://www.v8buick.com/index.php?threads/power-timing-your-buick-v8.63475/
If you’re trying to run factory initial timing, I wouldn’t bother. I think I’m running 12* initial, BUT I have limited my total timing using (I believe) a Mr. Gasket or a Crane ignition curve kit. You shouldn’t just advance the timing without limiting the total. You should also run vacuum advance. With my high compression pistons, I have stock advance springs in the distributor, because it pings if I bring the timing in too quickly. Good luck! Oh, my cheapie aluminum radiator is a Champion that cost about $220. I don’t like the way it looks, but it keeps the temps down. I spray painted the front of the tanks so it doesn’t shine through the grille.