I’m in the middle of reading Thomas Bonsall’s excellent Cadillac: The American Standard. Published in 1993, it arrived at my local library by interlibrary loan from the Michigan Historical Library in our capital of Lansing, MI. It smells for all the world like a book that has sat on a shelf for years without being opened, a first edition that the late author obviously obsessed over, a labor of love. And although few readers will appreciate his work, its quality is evident. Just like this 1941 Cadillac’s.
What makes this Cadillac so special and so rare is its model designation: Model 67. Never heard of it? Neither had I. In fact, when I found this example at Sloan Museum’s “Golden Memories” car show in September 2018, I thought it was a Series 75 limousine.
Nope. The 75 has some subtle differences, the most distinct being its exposed running boards and more upright appearance (compare the rear door pillars of the 67 and 75). My mistake was forgivable, as neither car was a volume leader for the company, let alone the brand. The 75’s sales figures, however, easily eclipsed the 67’s: 2,104 to 922. Cadillac sold the 67 in four configurations, both five and seven-passenger, while the 75 could be ordered six ways. Regardless of the configuration, the Series 67’s wheelbase was actually three inches longer than the 75’s: 139 inches versus 136 inches.
The key difference is price: the Series 67 was not a Fleetwood, unlike the 75 and 60 Special, and thus made an extended-length sedan more affordable. The various 67 sedan versions cost about 15% less than comparable 75s. The 67’s body was also used by Buick (shown above) for its Series 90 lwb sedans/limousine, whereas the 75 was exclusive to Cadillac.
Although I didn’t count seats in our example, it was the first car I fell in love with at this particular outing: Its stance as it sat in the grass. That menace. Those fender skirts. Those gleaming fender strakes. Even my general disdain for mafia movies couldn’t dim my affection for this Cadillac, a car that seems ready-built for a starring role in a gangster drama.
According to legend (many of which are apocryphal), the 1938 Lincoln Zephyr was a catalyst for the 1941 Cadillac. Like most luxury brands, including Cadillac and especially Packard, Lincoln’s front ends were founded on vertical themes. Bob Gregorie, Lincoln’s chief stylist, created the Zephyr’s new grill out of necessity: The old upright grille starved the radiator of air, which inhibited its ability to do its job, namely, to radiate. Therefore, an obvious example of the stylists helping the engineers created a new styling trend, the horizontal grille motif.
Whether Harley Earl was already plotting something similar or not is open to conjecture, but either way, the ’41 Cadillac was a dramatic departure from the ’40; and its bold, handsome, glamorous new grille has helped make it one of the most popular true classics, according to the Classic Car Club of America.
All ’41 Cadillacs were powered by the same 346 cubic-inch flathead V8, directing 150 horsepower through the buyer’s choice of a three-speed manual or a new Hydra-Matic. It appears that the original owner of the feature car chose the manual, which is probably just as well. My research has told me that rebuilding an original Hydra-Matic requires quite a few special tools and even more special skills. Or money. Lots of money.
This view of the Cadillac highlights the pontoon fenders that would go out of style soon after the war, but not before they enjoyed one last surge of popularity with the ’42 models.
In 1942, the pontoons extended into the doors on all Cadillacs that weren’t Series 75 models. Cadillac only made 700 1942 Series 67s, and the example pictured above (thanks to RM Sotheby’s) sold for 16,500 dollars at their Motor City auction in 2016. That kind of a deal always hurts if it wasn’t yours. Regardless, the 1942’s styling held on through the 1947 models, while 1948 ushered in a new generation of Harley Earl-ness, including the new tailfins. Thanks to World War II, the fantastic ’42s didn’t get much of a chance in the marketplace, but the 1941 model’s styling hung on through 1949 on the Series 75 models.
Whether the ’41 or the ’42 looks better, however, is up to you and your stylistic discernment. I’ll take either, but this much is true, according to author Bonsall: this was the era in Cadillac’s history where Packard and Lincoln were left chasing what would soon be tailfins. Lincoln’s Model K ended production, and the Lincoln Custom was arguably not quite in the Cadillac stratosphere. Packard was introducing the new Clipper, which was aimed more at Chrysler than at Cadillac. While Lincoln almost always showed flashes of brilliance; from this point on, Cadillac was where it was at, as this uncommon Series 67 shows.
Wonderful read. The ’41 has always been especially loved by Cadillac aficionados. We had a ’47 60S which was merely a slight refinement of the ’42 version, shown above. Many Cad fanciers of this era will tell you they prefer the 346 flathead V8 to the 331ohv that came after. It was quiet, smooth, and torquey. Hard to choose but I’d tend to agree. It was good enough for 2 of them to power the Stuart tank.
Marurice Hendry (a Kiwi I think?) wrote the first comprehensive (and superlative) history of Cadillac under the auspices of Automotive Quarterly in the 60s (?) since updated, one of the few books I’ll keep in my library. Bonsall’s Lincoln book, the same, I’d like to read this one. Of course AQ’s Packard book, written by a slew of Packard experts, is the last word on that subject, another keeper.
.btw there was also a Cadillac model 63 in ’41 & ’42 and postwar ’46, little known and same 126″ wb as a 62 but it was kind of a stretched body model 61, on a B-body, sort of a LaSalle continuation in a way. Cad models (and GM bodies in general) of the era could be a bit on the confusing side at times.
I’d disagree re: the Clipper being positioned vs Chrysler, the mid-year ’41 yes, but by ’42 the Clipper 180 was more expensive than a Cad 67, had extensive luxury features, Mosstred carpet, and the mighty 356 9 bearing engine, most powerful in the industry
a true luxury car competitor by any standard. RR copied that engine, used only by the Phantom.
Yes, I have heard of the Series 67. But then, I am an old goat. Thanks for a nice essay on this treasure.
Beautiful car and a great write up. Looking at this, I can’t stop wondering what it would be like to drive one of these things. Having all of that hood in front of oneself must be quite daunting.
Looks like a shiny, spacious , hearse and/or “funeral home, limo”.
Nice, and rare especially over here, they werent sold here at all, after the outbreak of WW2 in Sept 39 no new cars other than for military use arrived.
Very informative. Thank you
I think a prewar Hydra-Matic would be daunting to deal with. A 1941–42 Cadillac Hydra-Matic is quite a bit different from the more commonplace Dual-Range Hydra-Matic that went into a lot of early ’50s cars, there weren’t that many made, and they’re NOT the same as the units in prewar Oldsmobiles. I fear that even the few people who still know how to work on the old four-speed Hydra-Matic transmissions might be thrown by the differences.
1941 established the massive horizontal egg crate grille as a Cadillac design element. A styling that has continued until today. I find that the ’42’s with their extended fenders were not as well handled as Buick’s, which continued as a sweep spear into the rear fenders, but it’s all a personal call. It sure seems like GM wanted to find and exploit any possible market niche. Did they really need so many different models? After the War they jettisoned all the really big, low production series cars and concentrated on higher production. Cadillac was able to successfully transition during this period while Lincoln, and especially Packard, couldn’t come up with the right formula. My uncle had a ’49 sedanette, which may have been a series 61 as it was very plain inside. I recently went to see a ’40 La Salle and it was also quite plain inside, since the series 61 sort of replaced LaSalle as a companion make. I also checked out a ’41 Sixty Special, and it was obvious that these were much better trimmed cars. By the early ’50’s, the popularity of the DeVille series meant that most Cadillacs were pretty fancy inside. The Calais, which was sold into the late 60’s was never that popular, though Cadillac probably picked up a few sales among their most fiscally prudent customers.
I remember how much trouble I had finding a shop to rebuild the transmission in my ’56. I wouldn’t mind a Caddy with a three speed.
My guess is that the Series 67 came about as a response to sales feedback suggesting that there might be a market for a cheaper big formal car, probably aimed mostly at fleets — taxi and livery companies that wanted something cheaper than the Fleetwood Series 75. In this period, offering different model variations like this didn’t represent any huge investment, so if anticipated demand didn’t materialize, it probably wasn’t seen as a great loss.
Also, with these kinds of niche products, Cadillac felt there was value in demonstrating their responsiveness to customer needs. The fleet business (and I have to think a car like this was not really aimed at owner-drivers) relies a lot on relationships, so that customers will keep coming back when they need to replace their existing vehicles.
Thank you Aaron. I’d heard of the Series 67 inasmuch as Cadillac Series 67 sounds vaguely ‘right’ to my memory, while something like Series 65 sounds ‘wrong’. But I knew no more than then, until now.
To me any upper-class American car interior of this period would look amazing, so I’m no judge. I’m quite taken by all the fine detailing in this 67. Does anyone know how the interior of a 67 compared with the 75? I know the 75 was a ‘Fleetwood’, but aside from the name, how different was the interior? I’m having trouble imagining something visibly better.
Here’s a listing for a 1941 Series 67 with more interior shots:
https://www.classic.com/veh/1941-cadillac-series-67-limousine-9340440-nQmlMNn/
Here’s one for a 1941 Series 75:
https://www.mecum.com/lots/1135638/
(It doesn’t have the original powertrain, but I think the interior is representative.)
Here’s another 75:
https://www.mecum.com/lots/1135638/