I think it’s fair to say that many of us have some aspect of our physical appearance that we wish was different in some way. I’m not even talking about extreme cases we may have read about involving plastic surgery addicts, but I’d theorize that even among most emotionally, mentally and physically healthy individuals, the percentage of people who believe they are 100% physically perfect is probably slim-to-none. People may consider themselves to be reasonably attractive, but with the qualifier that there are one or two (or three) little things they wish they could change. For me, and as a somewhat insecure adolescent, that thing was my nose.
Mine is a big, honking, convex thing. I suppose this was my destiny, when I envision my father’s stout, west African schnozz and my mother’s long, Teutonic beak, but my observation has been that it isn’t usually until our teenage years that our faces start to show what we’re really going to look like in adulthood. Up until maybe around the fifth grade, my nose was a much smaller, button-like thing on my little round face. By the time I hit middle school, I feel like my nose had overtaken my (very prominent) front teeth as perhaps my most noticeable facial feature.
Perhaps this is why I could never completely warm to the newly-resized and reclassified personal luxury 1969 Pontiac Grand Prix. People have waxed poetic about the brawny length of its hood, luxurious proportions, and taut, muscular styling. For me, when I had first taken notice of this generation of GP, I just couldn’t get past that beak on its face. Did the front clip of the 1969 and ’70 Grand Prix hit too close to home? Was my self-esteem as a kid really that poor and/or tied to my unfavorable self-assessment of one aspect of my appearance that I subconsciously couldn’t allow myself to appreciate the stylistic genius of a year, make and model of car that seems to be nearly universally loved?
Lest anyone have any concerns about the state of my own mind and any perceived body dysmorphia, in young adulthood I came to absolutely love my nose. Okay, too far… I more than made peace with it. I like my nose. Do you know why? Because it’s part of what gives me true visual identity. My light brown skin tone and other facial features are ethnically ambiguous enough, especially given my cleanly shaven scalp and absence of hair; It’s my nose’s size and shape that provide some clearer clues as to what my background(s) may be.
It’s the same thing with this GP. By looking at it, could this machine be anything other than a Pontiac? I’m guessing that even some Millennials who aren’t necessary car fanatics could easily and readily identify this beautiful, blue coupe as a Pontiac by the protrusion up front and its split grille – familial themes that would continue, unbroken, until the demise of the marque in the mid-Aughts.
I have also seen some pretty grotesque examples of unnecessary plastic surgery gone wrong, and have felt true compassion for such self-victims who chose to (unsuccessfully) alter some aspect(s) of their appearance instead of making peace with it / them. Like recording artist Ray Stevens sings in his Billboard Hot 100 Number One hit from 1970, everything is beautiful in its own way. Though he may be viewed as more of a novelty act, I absolutely believe he means what he says when I hear him sing these lyrics.
The bottom line is also that it’s what’s inside that really matters. Some of the people I’ve encountered, both men and women, who I have considered paragons of physical perfection have turned out to be not so beautiful on the inside as evidenced by their words and actions. Likewise, many of us are familiar with some experience, whether first- or secondhand, with some beautifully-styled car that had ended up being the source of significant unpleasantness.
Many vehicles are purchased by consumers who want to identify with a certain perceived look, lifestyle, or social standing. I mean, who wouldn’t want to think of themselves as a “human Corvette”, Mustang or Cadillac? The reality is that if we individuals were translated into cars and trucks on the “highway” of everyday life, many of our characteristics would place us in more down-to-earth territory in a group as diverse as the conveyances in the slowly creeping rush hour traffic on Chicago’s Dan Ryan Expressway. I may or may not be as outwardly cool as a 1970 Pontiac Grand Prix, but as it proudly wears its prominent nose, so have I learned to do the same.
Edgewater, Chicago, Illinois.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011.
“…could this machine be anything other than a Pontiac?”
Well, the large, protuberant split grille theme has been taken to an extreme on some recent BMWs…
Very good point. Regarding those new BMW’s… I knew I’d seen that face before!
While new Lexuses appear to been inspired by the front of the 1961 full-size Plymouth.
Agree. And it makes me really miss what once was….
Hell, it makes me miss Bangle!
Things are going to get much MUCH worse…
Matt,
Wow.
Just, wow.
I guess I’m no longer a car guy. Can’t be anymore.
I’ve seen too much now.
I can never be wide-eyed and hopeful again about new cars.
Maybe I’ll collect snow globes or something.
Unless BMW starts making those,
in which case they would just be filled with blood and goat skulls
to keep with the style they are going with.
GN, I can’t stop staring at that picture. It’s like the 3-series on the left was attached to an air hose a la “Dig Dug” the arcade game.
Any chance that’s photoshopped? It’s hard to believe there is that much difference in the size. I mean look at the tires!
Something doesn’t look right with the shadows to me
Wow, GN, what a photo!
I’ve always suspected that this car (as well as similar-vintage T-Bird’s) “nose” was meant to evoke another body part.
Wasn’t this also a “Bunkie Beak” like the Thunderbirds?
I’m not sure of the timing in this. I know he was with GM right around the time this would’ve been designed and then made the switch to Ford.
And Joseph, don’t be so hard on yourself. At least judging by your avatar pic, you’re a pretty good looking guy.
Knudsen was long gone from Pontiac by the time this car was designed. This car was DeLorean’s baby.
Knudsen was with GM til 68, so he was there when the 69 GP was conceived. But he was out of Pontiac management before that.
Thanks, RS Rick. No, all is well in my head! LOL
And Geeber, I now feel like to need to research the timeline of Knudsen’s and DeLorean’s tenure, because now I’m curious.
Knudsen had left Pontiac for Chevrolet in 1961.
DeLorean was promoted to general manager of Pontiac in 1965, and stayed there until February 1969, when he moved to head the Chevrolet Division.
Well played, Joe. The moment you got around to mentioning the nose the connection with this car was immediate.
This is a car I have only lately begun to appreciate. When these were new, they were “Yawn, just one more in an endless number of attractive cars being pumped out of the various GM Divisions.” Only recently have I come to admire how Pontiac made something unique from the company.
I like the proportions of these, and find them very nicely styled. Earlier GPs may have been cool but they were an odd mashup of “regular” Pontiac and “special” Pontiac. These may not have been as exclusive, but they really hit a sweet spot in the market. John Z had that same innate sense of what would sell that Lee A did across town. It’s a shame nobody at the Chrysler Corporation of that era shared that gift.
I think Ford looked at this, and decided to extend the protuberance of their grille from the 1970 to make the 1971, -ahem- stand out further. The Ford and the GP would not be mistaken as stable mates, but there is that mild resemblance.
Bunkie did it. Semon Knudsen jumped from GM to Ford in 1968. The timing is perfect.
Used to call these the “Grand Parrot”.
All of us have cognitive abilities that we respond to based upon our cultural and personal feelings. All styling is judged based upon how well the object visually stimulates us. There are a few things that the Grand Prix does that make it attractive.
The long hood. It isn’t just because the car could hold a powerful and large engine, it is also because the long hood is shaped with the correct proportions to signify thrusting power. The wheel wells are nearly centered under the long hood. There is a lot of overhang that is sculptured to break up the mass. We can snicker all we want, but the long hood and front end proportions signify that this car is, ahem, “ready to get down to business”.
Then there is the smaller tight rear end, but I’ll stop there.
Not every car with a long hood evokes this. The 1971-74 T-Bird/Mark IV doesn’t. No matter how bad the bad guys were, William Conrad didn’t make the Lincoln Mark IV look sexy, (unless you were into fatties with fat cars). On the other hand, the Ford Torino from 1972 does. Watching Starsky and Hutch race around in a red ’74 Torino worked for Ford, even though the Torino used during that cop show had the blunted front end with the parking bench bumpers. Imagine if S/H drove around in a ’72 Torino!
As a styling gimmick, the long thrusting power hoods became common and ended up sporting hood ornaments, enormous flat grilles, ugly Fed bumpers, and consequently they lost their uniqueness.
But this car has it! That is why we are still drawn to it as opposed to the stylings that came after it.
VanillaDude, this GP does definitely have the “it factor”, as you alluded to in your last sentence – and for all the reasons you mention. The proportions are just fantastic on these.
Now that you mention it, I find it interesting that Pontiac took its split-grille theme to an extreme with this car, but afterwards kept the theme until the division’s bitter end. One would assume that after Peak Nose here, the whole concept would quickly wane, like tailfins did through the 1960s. But instead, Pontiac used the same theme for decades more, with the effect of creating a remarkable brand identity.
I too am blessed with a large…nose. But this car would (to me) be just as attractive, if not more so, with just a wide front end and no protrusion, the side view is excellent and the rear could be improved or left alone as is.
Nice how you managed to include the newer Grand Prix in the second to last shot too!
Jim, before you mentioned the GP behind our featured car, I had totally forgotten that bit of serendipity when I got these pictures! This neighborhood coffee shop (Metropolis Coffee Company) is on my walk to and from the train into the city, and there have been some amazing car finds parked in front of it over the years.
The owner of this car saw me taking these pictures (eight years ago… I’m gobsmacked that it has been that long) and stopped to chat about it. I wish I had remembered more of his and my conversation, because that’s probably the direction I would have taken this article, but I did like the way this essay turned out
I saw this 1971 Pontiac Grand Ville convertible a few months ago in Munich and loved its majestic presence.
This is a great shot of a beautiful car!
Could it be anything but a Pontiac? Actually the brand resonance goes all the way back to Oakland, which had a V-shaped radiator much like this ’70.
But the V radiator wasn’t unique. Silver Streaks were the UNIQUE Pontiac trademark and shouldn’t have been abandoned.
The front end looks fine to me… it’s the rear of the car that falls flat (literally) It unfortunately reminds me of the 70’s Coronet tail end treatment.
Perhaps Pontiac management realized this, as the 1971-72 models feature a more sculptured deck lid and rear bumper.
I feel this way about most 68-72 A bodies. The GP like the rest looks fantastic from the front, elegant from the sides and just meh from the back.
I also agree that the boat-tailed 1971 & ’72 models were more attractive, but I don’t have any issues with the flat rear panel on the original ’69 and ’70 models. It’s also true, though, that often, it’s “all in the details”, as is said – and the tweaking done for ’71 was right in so many ways.
Wow, that closeup of the grille in the last picture really highlights the prominence of the nose in a way that I never considered before. All the subliminal messages evoked by the styling aside, I have always really like this generation of Grans Prix, which convey all the positive attributes of an American car without becoming a complete caricature, like Cannon’s T-Bird. My absolute favorite is the 1971-72 version, with the boat tail rear end and single headlight front.
According to the trunk badge, this one is a model “J” not and not an “SJ”. I do know from experience that the SJ engine (428 CI in ’69 and 455 CI in ’70) was available as an option in the J.
How right you are! Thank you for pointing out the correct submodel. I’ll fix it.
Traditionally unflattering features like a big schnoz or a mole can end up making someone more beautiful than if they were “perfect”, just depends on the rest. These pull off what the bunkie beak Tbird’s or the 70 B body Pontiac couldn’t because the rest of the face had the bone structure to pull it off, I’ve never really noticed or cared how much the grille protrudes out on these GPs in contrast.
It’s interesting how the bunkie beak Thunderbird is so memorable for its Pontiac impression with its pointed grille, when in the big picture all of the Thunderbird’s of the 70s and arguably Ford as a whole used the 69 Grand Prix front as a template for almost every car they made.
Huh – I guess you must have missed the Lincoln Mark III that came before the Grand Prix. Lee Iacocca would be ticked off by your posting, wouldn’t he?
That applies to the 77 birds and the LTDs with headlight doors, but the quad headlights individually placed within the body colored valence is where I distinctly see GP influence in that front end
But Lido ticked me off with K car broughams anyway, so we’re even 🙂
My dream car, back in the decade.
Excellent article as always. If your Bunkie Beak ever gets down to the Wicker Park/Ukrainian Village area I’ll put a couple drinks under it. 🙂
Deal!
Made me think of the Durante Beak Citation. Not the Chevrolet one, though.
https://books.google.com/books?id=HDf2ckv0EsYC&pg=PA69&lpg=PA69&dq=durante+beak&source=bl&ots=mmGybOAoop&sig=ACfU3U0VLaZexte68PDpFS9R6Mr9Y8XGgQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi6v_-eutTlAhVOE6YKHburDz0Q6AEwG3oECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=durante%20beak&f=false
An aircraft – how cool. It could also be said that the other automotive Citation, the Edsel model, also had a “beak” of sorts.
The gaping, honeycombed maws on late-model Japanese vehicles and Audis remind me of Baleen whiles cruising the oceans sifting krill.