(first posted 2/19/2014) In 1978, Chrysler launched its own all-new FWD small cars, the Plymouth Horizon and Dodge Omni (CC here). The Galant Colts (gen1 and gen2) were essentially in the same size and price category as the Omnirizon twins, so they were eventually sent out to pasture, as their role as the primary small car in Dodge showrooms was effectively over. But there were still niches to be filled, including in Plymouth stores, and going forward that was the role that Colts were destined to play, starting with the smaller Lancer-based Colt.
The 1971 to 1977 Galant-Colts used a 95.3” wheelbase, and ran about 171” in overall length. This Lancer-Colt rides on a five inch shorter wheelbase, and lacks about nine inches in body length compared to the Galant based car. Some of the literature from 1977 calls this the “Mileage Maker” model, a high-efficiency model that was optimized for eye-popping EPA mileage numbers.
For the 1977 model year, Dodge carried over the old model in the two door coupe and four door wagon guise, and sold this new Lancer based Colt as the two and four door sedans. This collage of models shows the four body styles offered. The top two cars were Galant-Colts, while our two door Curbside Classic and the four door model are both Lancer-Colts. A bit confusing?
Why bring out a smaller Colt? Perhaps this ad makes things clear. As you can see, the 1977 Dodge Colt marketing focused on price and mileage. With the Omni scheduled for release in January of the next year, and probably wanted to position the Colt as an economy special, while also promoting the highest possible fuel economy numbers in a tough economy.
The internet also hints that tensions between Chrysler and Mitsubishi developed during this period. Mitsubishi wanted to export more vehicles to America, while Chrysler wanted to develop new US small car product to keep their hometown factories humming. Moving the Colt nameplate from car to car could be a symptom of a growing rift between Dodge and their overseas supplier. I didn’t find any juicy details, but the fact that in the early eighties Mitsubishi began selling cars in the US under their own nameplate supports the “Dodge isn’t selling enough of our cars” theory (Mitsubishi Cordia CC here).
Well, our little yellow Colt certainly screams inexpensive. Compared to that nicely finished Colt GT from 1976, this car includes all the hallmarks of a bargain basement stripper. No exterior trim, dog dish hubcaps, and a trunk lid that simply reads “Dodge.” Certainly Mitsubishi wanted to market higher profit vehicles than this in the world’s biggest car market.
But it could also be that Chrysler just didn’t know what to do with the Colt. For 1978, Dodge dropped the Galant based coupe, and replaced the Wagon with an entirely new model. As this image shows, the new wagon (CC coming later in this series) was considerably larger than the old car, and shared no parts outside the driveline. Dodge was using the Colt nameplate on all its imported cars, regardless of their position in the product line.
This approach continued in 1979. Dodge offered yet another Colt, this time an even smaller front wheel drive model called the Colt Hatchback (CC coming later in this series). Covering all bases, Dodge continued to offer the rear wheel drive sedans and big wagon alongside the hatchback in 1979, but dropped the sedans in 1980. The newer wagon would carry on until 1981, and the hatchback would remain until ’84, but our featured car lasted a mere three years in the US market.
And to confuse things a bit more, Plymouth started selling Mitsubishis too. In fact they beat Dodge with the new Celeste-coupe version of the Lancer-based car by one year, selling the Arrow starting in 1976.
In 1979, the Fire Arrow, sporting the big Mitsubishi 105 hp 2.6 four, became a bit of a cult classic. In the little Lancer body, it gave decent performance for quite little money, at a time when that was not easy to come by. Maybe it should have been called Hemi ‘Cuda II.
But the Arrow was just the start, as eventually Plymouth dealers also started selling certain Colt-branded Mitsubishis. They wanted in on the Japanese-car action, even if it wasn’t in really significant numbers.
I’d like to say something positive about this odd little Colt, but a closer look does not inspire. The rust on the corner of the back window does form a weep line over the fuel door, drawing our eyes to the (standard) locking gas cap. However, that’s rather typical of all Japanese product of the time, so we’re still looking for inspiration.
This closeup of the front bumper shows us everything is present, but the surface rust atop the bumper indicates this car is probably at the end of it’s life cycle. Someone is keeping it around for occasional transportation today, but I can’t picture a future buyer snapping it up as a restoration project, and there’s very few people interested in driving a patina laden, mid-seventies Japanese econo-box.
Looking at that interior does bring back memories, but not Dodge Colt memories. I drove a 1973 Toyota Corolla back in high school, and this cockpit matches it feature for feature. The round gauges, shifter placement, interior door latch, window crank, and arm rest come directly out of the same playbook. Even the dark colored door panels and light colored headliner match my Corolla memories.
Perhaps that similarity wasn’t exactly the best thing for this Colt. Given the speed of change we saw in the seventies, a new 1977 that recalled cars from five years earlier doesn’t strike me as a recipe for success. Searching the internet for further answers, I encountered this coupe with shiny paint and a lowered suspension. While a much nicer car than our featured car, it really does not move my thrill meter. Overall, I consider these ’77 to ’79 Colt sedans a lost generation–the final gasp for rear wheel drive, a cheap basic car to slot below the Omni, and a placeholder until Mitsubishi developed its own front wheel drive product.
To close, I’ll share this view of the most boring aspect of this boring car- the factory dog dish hubcaps. Credit where credit is due, the owner has kept track of all four of them for the past 37 years. Based on that accomplishment, I’ll anoint this Colt with full Curbside Classic accreditation. If the owner had not saved this Colt, we never would have learned how Dodge dithered with the Colt nameplate between 1977 and 1979, searching for a product line that fit their needs at the time.
Yes, this car came straight out of the 1973 Corolla playbook. If you squint, you can’t tell the two cars apart.
Looking forward to the writeup of the Colt hatchback, as I have some experience with those.
I suppose given the Corolla’s domination of the Japanese market and Mitsubishi’s “one day we will overtake Toyota” ambitions, that made a certain sense.
That was pretty much my reaction as well. Was the resemblance to a Corolla convergent evolution or blatant imitation?
Drive them back to back like I did and you could east see the difference The 78 Corolla with feeble 4k in stock rental condition was very ordinary on the road with very poor roadholding and shocking to steer in crosswinds and little performance in contrast the Mitsubishi Lancer stayed with a tyre squealing XJ6 Jaguar through the old earthquake gully section of HWY1 south of Taupo easily it held the road very well and the motor pulled ok for a 4 banger,
The wagon over the cross is the new 78 Mitsubishi Sigma as it was billed here in 2L only the 2.6 engine arrived a couple of models later meant to replace the Valiant in this part of the world it did eventually though Mitsubishi actually built Valiants at Tonsley Park until 82, Sigmas didnt sell as well as they hoped. Celestes we got too though without the 2.6 Astron option plenty got retrofitted later however and those are quite quick
Out of curiosity, did you guys ever get the twin-cam Corollas?
Not new the 2.0L twin cam with Corona engine was here in 93/4 in two door but the early Corollas with 2T and 3T didnt come here or Aussie only Corona twin cams Corollas had the 2,3,4,5K series engines.
Nope, it’s really Mr. M’s!
What is really fascinating to me is this: I was a Class-A Moparhead in the 1976-82 era (could I have picked a worse time?) Yet the story of this car is all new information to me. To me, these were odd little Japanese grafts on the mighty tree of Chrysler and were not really worth paying attention to.
I had no idea that they switched platforms, and could not have told you without researching it when they changed generations, at least up until the 1979 fwd model. Even the larger rwd models that stuck around into the early 80s – I do not even remember them, and I spent time in a Dodge showroom with my Mother who tried hard to buy an Omni in 1980. For whatever reason, the Colt was neither on her radar or on mine.
You are right that the car was quite a comedown from the model from the early 1970s. And I agree that there would be no reason for Dodge to offer a sporty or semi-luxurious model when the Omni was sharing the showroom starting in 1978. There is no money in the lowest end, and Mitsubishi cannot be blamed for eventually getting out of the box canyon it had gotten into in its arrangement with Chrysler.
JP-
Your experience parallels my own. I did recall Dodge releasing this Colt back in the day, but I thought it was simply an evolution of the previous car.
In addition, I completly missed the significant size change for this “Mileage Maker” Colt, and the fact that they still offered the Galant based car alongside this new Lancer based car.
Will this series include the very-ahead-of-its-time Colt Vista?
Yes; hang on two more days.
I recall a Car & Driver (?) test of the Lancer-Colt where they noted you could roll down all four windows — while still sitting in the driver’s seat.
These Lancer-based Colts were quite late in coming to the North American market, so the perception of them to be old fashioned would be correct. The home market Lancer actually went on sale in February of 1973, so we received the slightly restyled latter series of cars. That said, they were extremely durable and rugged, and very popular in rally competetion. Lancers won the Safari Rally in 1974, and took the top three positions in 1976!
Some of the higher trims of early series Lancers had a tail lamp arraingment very similar to the Hillman Avenger’s “hockey sticks”:
Thats the type we got most of.
I like this series and others like it, to refresh memories. Once I saw the first pic, I was like ‘ahh that’s the ’78 Colt’. I hadnt seen them in ages, and ads were all over car magazines.
I did buy a 1981 Plymouth Champ in 1985, based on C&D rave reviews, and had some affection for Mitsu built Mopars. But, car was built to fall apart after 65k miles.
The new Electric RAV4 in the background is fairly rare as well.
Ahhh, just another Southern California Electric car. I’ll see a Tesla or two and a couple of Nissan Leaf’s on my drive home tonight.
Nothing to see here, move along…
My neighbor had one of this in a slightly higher trim level a few decades ago. I always thought it was an attractive looking car. It does however have a real hint of mid 70s. Perhaps that is why I like it.
That front end sure reminds me of a Ford Maverick!
You remind me of something I wondered – with all of its horse names, I wonder how Ford let “Colt” get away. The Maverick should have been the Ford Colt.
In ascending order – by size?
Colt
Pinto
Mustang
What would they have used Clydesdale on???
The Bronco! Well….the Vigilante 8 video game pulled that one…
I always thought this was the ugliest of the small US market Colts (the Galant-like wagon was even worse) … somehow seeing a Maverick/Pinto front end on a new Japanese car in the late ’70’s just didn’t make sense.
That is totally a 1976 Pinto front end. Strange place to find inspiration…
the Mitsu Celeste (a.k.a. Plymouth Arrow) is sweet!
call it a CC-effect, but for no apparent reason, I stumbled over this ad for a pretty pristine example last week (but at pretty pristine price!):
http://suchen.mobile.de/auto-inserat/mitsubishi-andere-celeste-1600st-1-hand-original-81000km-oldtimer-bochum/187491870.html?lang=de&pageNumber=1&__lp=1&scopeId=C&sortOption.sortBy=price.consumerGrossEuro&makeModelVariant1.makeId=17700&makeModelVariant1.modelDescription=celeste&makeModelVariant1.searchInFreetext=false&makeModelVariant2.searchInFreetext=false&makeModelVariant3.searchInFreetext=false&negativeFeatures=EXPORT
I liked that there were a number of different Colts… it was almost as if it was its own brand. But I didn’t know the nameplate was muddled to this extent. And I sure don’t remember noticing how out of date this car was when new… I probably thought the new Colts I was seeing in 1978 were old ones.
I like the Colt script on the front fender.
i have a soft spot for these re-badged mitsubishis. i especially like the plymouth arrow. didn’t they have some cute name for the mca-jet intake and dual balance shafts? do i remember correctly that there was an auxiliary lever by the stick to engage overdrive?
nice writeup in hemmings:
http://www.hemmings.com/hsx/stories/2011/01/01/hmn_feature5.html
The Twin-Stick overdrive option came on the front wheel drive Mitsubishi’s, not the Rear Wheel Drive Celeste/Arrow.
One interesting thing about the Mopar/Mitsu imports from this era was the limited color choices. For instance, on the 1980 wagons you had a choice of all of TWO color combos (beige/tan interior or silver/red interior). Most models offered three or at most four colorways (although, often enough, each with color-coordinated interior…) and the top trim FWD hatchback was a single color per dealer channel/year, so you’d have two choices at any one time but would have to go across town to see both.
1980 Dodge imports colors:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/NA/Dodge/1980_Dodge/1980-Dodge-Imports-Brochure/1980-Dodge-Imports-12
1982 Plymouth:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/NA/Plymouth/1982-Plymouth/1982-Plymouth-Imports-Brochure/1982-Plymouth-Imports-18
Actually, coms not orgs, among other things –
1980 Dodge imports colors:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Dodge/1980_Dodge/1980%20Dodge%20Imports%20Brochure/image12.html
1982 Plymouth imports colors:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Plymouth/1982%20Plymouth/1982%20Plymouth%20Imports%20Brochure/image15.html
Whole brochure –
1980 Dodge imports:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Plymouth/1982%20Plymouth/1982%20Plymouth%20Imports%20Brochure/index1.html
1982 Plymouth imports:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Plymouth/1982%20Plymouth/1982%20Plymouth%20Imports%20Brochure/index1.html
My Dad had a bunch of these back in the day. I didn’t care for them but he seemed to really like them. If I found one today at the right price, I think I would buy it for him.
I kind of dig the white one with the red stripes, but I’ve kind of been on a ’70s Japanese car-liking kick lately. They just don’t exist in Michigan anymore, so it’s probably a grass is greener deal.
I bought that white one with red stripes brand new back in 78. 1.6 liter with MCA jet engine. Got 45-50 mpg on highway. nothing fancy no air or power windows but it did have an 8 track which I played Foreigner and The Cars music on.
Wow the Fire Arrow, you brought back some great memories Dave! That ’79 Colt Hatchback was a jewel of a car. They were so fast and in my book one of the first hot hatches. I would love to have a yellow one with the speed shift feature.
The twin stick manual transmission was one really cool feature on these when they were new. Good memories!
A hot rod technical question,
is it possible to drop a Chevy V6-60° engine and 5 speed manual in one of these ?
Anything is possible, but the only reason to go with the 60 degree Chevy is the narrow bank angle. If I wanted to Hot Rod this Colt, I’d locate a turbo Starion,
The 2.6 four cylinder is close to the Chevy’s base displacement, probably smoother, and definitely more powerful. In addition, the engine mounts should be common to the Lancer, and may use the same transmission.
A college friend of mine had one of these…looked like the two-door with the stripes running down the side. He loved it, and especially loved the MPG…
That white/red lowered coupe is pretty neat….Id rock that as a DD for sure! And the styling of the Fire Arrow looks like a couple of Datsuns from the same era, just better executed.
Ill never know how these weren’t a runaway sales success at the time. Due to the oil crisis, demand for small cars went thru the roof, and even those of us with a ‘buy American’ mindset could stomach a Moparized Mitsubishi over a straight up Japanese car. The styling/performance on these was at least as good as anything else offered at the time.
I remember prepping a green one of these as well as a red and white one while working at a Dodge dealership in 1977-78 as a car prep kid. The one thing that struck me above all else when the Mitsubishi products arrived (versus the domestic Mopar products), were the quality and attention to detail in workmanship and shipping when they came off the truck. It wasn’t even close! I guess that’s why after nearly 40 years (and many times purchasing domestic Mopar products), I bought my own Mitsubishi Outlander in 2016. It’s not special, but they’re still screwed together quite well. The tradition seems to continue.
I seem to recall that one of the enthusiast magazines (C&D?) really liked how those ‘77-‘79 Color sedans drove. A little bit sporty and nicely balanced, that was quite a ways from most Japanese cars of the day. The design sure did looked dated when it came out, though, like an early 70s Toyota, Mazda or Colt. i never would have given them a second glance if it weren’t for those reviews. As it was, I kept my eye out for a decent used one but never found it in northern Ohio.
Ive got a 78 dodge colt wagon for sale. My dad bought it new. He drive it until he passed last yr.