(first posted here 11/8/2012) No one’s going to accuse me of not having a nostalgic streak, especially when it comes to cars. That’s what motivated me to write the Auto-biography, my time travel through words. How about the real thing, in steel, glass, rubber and wool? One of my main motivations for starting Curbside Classics was to document and re-experience the cars from those early years, and few were as influential as the original Olds 88. Most of the time, the reliving is somewhat vicarious, but once in a while, I get lucky, and it’s the real thing. So let’s literally open the door to the past, and hop in for a ride with me in this beautiful 1951 Super 88. And if it gets a bit crowded, good; that’ll make it all the more authentic.
On a spring morning in 1959, a big black Olds 88 (a slightly older 1949-1950 model) rolled up in front of our apartment building in Innsbruck, Austria. I was already waiting out front, eagerly anticipating the appearance of one of my favorite cars in town (I pretty much knew them all). Herr Miller’s Olds was THE taxi to hire for special family outings, thanks to its roominess compared to the Mercedes 180 Diesels it shared with the downtown taxi stand. Well, that was the parents’ reason; mine was because of its burbling Rocket V8.
It was my sister and my cousin’s Confirmation, so a family outing with sponsors, aunt, and Grandma to some now-forgotten destination in the Alps was on order. The total party was eleven; my parents are not in the picture. If it wasn’t obvious, that’s me in the front looking very anxious to get going.
Since we were car-less and normally walked everywhere, we were trim and somehow all fit into the Olds. I got the best seat in the house: on my aunt’s lap (she’s the giant in the picture), in the middle of the front seat, right up against Herr Miller. In my mind, as I looked through the wing fins of the rocket-ship hood ornament, I was driving the big yank tank, making that Rocket V8 purr as it effortlessly glided us up into the mountains.
Fast forward a half century, and now I really am sliding behind that big steering wheel thanks to TTAC reader Oregon Sage. He and his wife picked up this well cared-for Super 88 a while back, and offered its services to me. I was sorely tempted to round up nine other folks, to really re-create the Confirmation outing, but since my host wasn’t charging a fare, I decided that might be pushing things a bit, literally.
My first impression upon entering is that highly familiar and distinctive old car smell, the polar opposite of today’s polymeric factory air. Understandable too, as almost all the interior ingredients other than steel and glass are organic: wool fabrics on the seat, headliner and doors; horse-hair stuffing; and over half a century’s of boogers stuck under the seat. Between the odors they’ve absorbed and those created by their subtle decay, it’s a mélange that induces nostalgia, melancholy and the desire to crack one of the vent windows.
The 303 cubic inch V8 quickly springs to life after a burst from the chrome starter button on the dash. And while it warms its fluids for a minute or so, I had better talk about this ground-breaking engine, especially since I got (rightly) razzed for omitting any reference to it in my story on the ’50 hot-rod Caddy. Hey, I just got carried away by that awesome beast.
Contrary to its late-stage geriatric image, Oldsmobile once was the innovation division at GM. As such, it got the green light (along with Caddy) to develop the first new modern ohv V8 engines. It was a friendly sort of inter-divisional competition, and the Caddy appeared six months before the Olds, but both engines were big-time winners. Except for a couple of very minor teething issues, these engines quickly developed reputations for bulletproof reliability and longevity.
Originally, the plan was to only put the Rocket V8 in the big 98-series cars, but a late decision to drop it into the smaller and lighter 76-series created the legendary 1949 Futuramic 88, the first modern affordable muscle car. Of course, that title is highly relative, since with 135 horsepower, the early versions of the V8 weren’t exactly Rockets. With a stick-shift on a good day, it might scoot from 0-60 in about twelve seconds. But the competition all had pokey old-school sixes and straight eights, so the 88 was in a class of its own.
image: photobucket/crabber
It took a NASCAR title in ’49, and a class speed record at Daytona of 100.28 mph. And it inspired the rock and roll classic, penned by Ike Turner:
You may have heard of jalopies,
You heard the noise they make,
Let me introduce you to my Rocket ‘88.
Yes it’s great, just won’t wait,
Everybody likes my Rocket ‘88.
Gals will ride in style,
Movin’ all along…
Have I given the Rocket its due props? Oh, I forgot; from its modest 303 cubic inch, 135 hp beginnings, its muscles swelled through the years to 455 cubes (7.4 liters) and 400 horsepower. And then terminal atrophy set in; by 1980 it was back to 307 cubes (5 liters) and 150 hp; by 1988, 140 hp. Circular development, or just old age?
I’d say we’ve duly warmed up this motor, so let’s drop her into gear. Now we have to give the Hydramatic equal time. That granddaddy of all automatics was developed in the thirties and first appeared on the 1940 Oldsmobile. It operates quite differently from its modern namesakes. Because it uses a fluid coupling, which doesn’t amplify torque like a torque converter, it needs plenty of gears, four of them actually. And they’re mighty anxious: with a gentle take-off, we were well into third before reaching the far side of a small downtown intersection.
The Hydramatic, with its busy and bumpy shifting, doesn’t really feel like a “slush box” at all, but more like the sequential auto-shifters today (the dumber ones, that is, like the Smart). Well, there’s a lot going on down there, especially in the 2-3 shift, which involves the simultaneous operation of two bands and two clutches. Synchronizing their dance perfectly was hard enough when new; after almost sixty years you have to cut them some slack.
But it’s an efficient box; in high gear, only 25% of the engine torque flows through the fluid coupling, so it feels directly coupled, like a stick shift, and very unlike the Buick’s Dynaflow propeller-in-a-bucket-of-water sensations. And contrary to some of GM’s later innovations, the original Hydramatic was a durable collection of gears, clutches, bands and tireless little gnomes that worked them all, right from the get-go.
These old tanks are perfect cars for tooling around on a quiet Sunday morning in Eugene, which probably best replicates the traffic conditions of Innsbruck back then. One feels more like a helmsman than a driver, as the giant steering wheel dominates the manual tasks at hand, thanks to the automatic. Ponderous and slow at first, the unassisted tiller lightens with speed, but only relatively so. Handling? It hadn’t been invented yet, at least not in Detroit. The tired springs and shocks don’t help either.
But the engine is responsive and distinctly feels like the most modern component in this car. If you dropped it into a 1988 Cutlass Supreme Classic Brougham Coupe (whew; what a mouthful) you’d probably never notice the difference from the 140 hp 307 in that. Or maybe you would; the ’51 303 probably has better throttle response.
These Rocket 88s are for the open road, and this one is still quite happy to purr along at seventy on the highway. That universally abused old Driver’s Ed invocation about keeping a car’s length distance for every ten miles per hour suddenly pops in my head, and for a good reason: old drum brakes. I can see that venerable graphic from the textbook in my mind’s eye, with the spaces laid out in front of the represented car, which I swear was an old Oldsmobile like this.
The Rocket 88’s influence is monumental, and not just from a hot-rodding perspective. Just like the ’32 Ford V8 spoiled Americans with a step up in everyday performance, so again did the 88. And the whole industry followed its lead; the 88 is the prototype of the quintessential American car: a responsive and torquey V8, automatic transmission, and room for…eleven skinny and car-starved Austrians. Most Americans quickly settled for nothing less. But what about places like Austria in the fifties?
In its time, cars like this Olds were living on an exulted plain in the Old Country. The choice of many affluent Europeans then, they were desirable and highly respected. A 30 hp VW was still a distant aspiration of the middle class. My father, a doctor, and all six of my aunts and uncles were still car-less when we emigrated in 1960. Within a few years, that all changed; all the aunts and uncles had wheels. And when I went back for the first time in 1969, Herr Miller was driving a new W114 Mercedes 200 diesel, with bucket seats. No six-year olds were going to be sidled up next to him in that taxi, making vivid memories worth writing about fifty years later.
This piece is just as fabulous to read as it was the first time. It also makes me sad, because there really was a time when an American manufacturer (and GM in particular) made the best cars in the world. Imagine how much more this must have cost to buy and to run than the local MB in postwar Germany.
Think about it – from its quality materials and construction to its groundbreaking modern engineering in the Rocket V8 and HydraMatic. It is cars like this that make me so deeply disappointed in the General Motors of decades later. Once upon a time, they built the best of the best. Sadly, that has not been true for quite awhile now.
Yes, there was a time when the U.S. auto industry, and GM in particular, got things right. A large solid car with V-8 power and a reliable automatic transmission that the middle class could afford. M-B couldn’t come close to this in 1951, albiet thier cars were for a far different market.
Always liked Oldmobiles and learned to drive in the family’s 1963 Dynamic 88 4-Dr. HT. Sofa like bench seats and a big, torquey 394. Wanted dad to go for the Super 88 with the 330 HP Skyrocket V-8 and those cool, stainless steel inside window frames, but he wouldn’t go for the extra bucks. The 280 HP Rocket V-8 was great, but I recall a huge lag between 1st and 2nd gear from the slim jim HydraMatic.
Indeed. Not to mention these cars’ absolutely stunning looks. Postwar America in a nutshell. This Olds doesn’t have a single bad line on it. And look at this dashboard!
As a card-carrying member of the Conspiracy to Really Antagonize People, I object to the presentation of a well-engineered General Motors product in decent condition. I thought we all agreed at the Big Meeting that such products and their associated memories shall only appear on this site when full of CRAP.
😉
Lol 😀
Did you see my sister at that meeting? She acts like a member of CRAP.
Great story Paul. I felt like I was there with you. My family had many Oldsmobiles, including myself.
Funny, I never took you for an Oldsmobile. 🙂
My engineer father was more inclined to practicality and innovation than pure comfort and performance unfortunately. Thus my sister and I grew up with a 1949 Kaiser that did provide comfort but not performance. Oldsmobiles were very popular in our small PA town and I was a bit envious of a classmate whose father had a dark green 88 1949 Olds with the rocket engine. I never rode in one until one of my uncles bought a 53 Olds 88 after getting out of the Air Force. I still recall the burble of the engine and the comforting slight whine of the hydramatic. I spent my junior high years piloting the hallways between classes in my own imaginary Oldsmobile complete with sound effects if you were close enough to hear.
Paul, thank you for this wonderful story. The way you put together a story, with family remembrances, period advertising and beautiful (and sometimes, not so beautiful cars!) is much like sitting down to an in-depth Frontline documentary. Or listening to a classic symphony piece. I never knew our cars made it overseas after the war! But I can fully understand that boyhood fascination with the American V-8. There has to be something in our hearts and minds that constantly tug at those memories of that idling 427 or 455 or 383 that we never let go. Just one of the many reasons why I love to come and visit your site each and every day! 🙂
What?? No close up shot of that awesome steering wheel hub??
My bad; just added it to the text.
What is the small gauge to the right of the wheel with “0-30-60”?
I suspect it’s oil pressure.
It’s labelled “oil” at the bottom.
Love that photo of you and your family. It’s interesting, because it tells so much about you, already in that early age. You are the only one that is aware of the surroundings and the situation itself. Being “in the moment”, but also with the outsiders perspective of looking in at the same time. That self awateness, that self reflectiveness, that analyzing mind. It’s like you are breaking the fourth wall, speaking to the audience directly: “Can you believe they don’t understand what a fantastic moment this really is? Am i the only one understanding the significance?”
“Can you believe they don’t understand what a fantastic moment this really is? Am i the only one understanding the significance?”
Quite true; every car ride back than was a peak experience for me then, especially in a new (different) car. It’s as if the whole event was for me, not them. They were just the passengers.
Very good story. The only thing I would add would be a music file of that Oldsmobile burble.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbfnh1oVTk0
And with Betty Page, too!
Not bad, but I was referring to the sound of the car itself! Oldsmobile motors have a sound all their own.
This was the best I could find in a quick Youtube search… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubvUX616IKI
Riding in a 1956 88 Holiday at the Automobile Driving Museum (in/near LA?)
I dont think the 303 in this is related to the 455 or the 307, they are all Olds engines, but not ALL the same engine, Olds had a new V8 in the late 60’s like Buick and Cadillac.
1964 I believe. By ’63 the original had grown to 394 cid and presumably that was about the limit. The new engine started out with 330 or 425 cid. I’ve never been inside the original, so I don’t know how much if anything was shared.
Quite true…I presented a rather liberal version of the Rocket V8 geneology.
The tall lady is not leaning on a 51 Oldsmobile. More likely a 49 – 50 model. Did Paul’s memory slip? In my teen years I recall driving a 51: rather ponderous, difficult to park, lots of steering but extremely comfortable, silent and nimblefooted once going. Much, much better than our 51 Powerglide Chevy. AGB
No; but the ’51 was as close as it got. I didn’t actually say it was a ’51 in the story.
One time my parents and another couple went to a square dance convention or something for a weekend. For some reason they took my parents’ 1950 Packard and left the other couple’s 1953 Olds 98 in our driveway. This was in 1957, and my driving experience was pretty much limited to my 1947 Chevy Fleetline 2-door and the Packard. (Besides pickups and trucks, that is….) Needless to say, I just had to try out that big 98 late Saturday afternoon. It had power steering, so it felt quite different from the Packard, and of course it had better acceleration. It was totally lacking in road manners just like the Packard, but was certainly smooth. I carefully reparked it exactly where it had been, and afaik none of the neighbors ratted me out.
Just yesterday, here in Eugene, I saw another Olds Rocket 88, a 1950 by its antique license plate, but more likely at ’52 or ’53. It had the same Rocket 88 badge, the same mini-fins, and the fabulous globe behind the badge int he middle of the grille (also on the steering wheel hub, I see here).
During this period the aviation design theme in Detroit was still based on propeller planes, not jets, even though the Rocket name foretold the near future, when we would get ridiculous sharp pointed fins on show cars.
Nobody else noticed that the “Olds” motor in the hot rod is actually a Chevy?
Nobody else has, because it really is an Olds. Ever seen a Chevy V8 with valve cover bolts coming through the valve covers?? That’s a dead giveaway right there. And that’s just for starters….
Hate to say it but that is a Small Chevy masquerading as an olds.
The cylinder head shape and exhaust port area are very different on the Olds.
Here’s one for comparison.
Pic didn’t attach.
Look at the difference in heads, location of the spark plugs and the face.
You’re quite right. I didn’t look at it closely. I’ve got a picture of the real thing to swap it with. Thanks for the heads up.
Old school style GM tappet cover used on everything untill the advent of bolts around the lower perimeter of the pressing, Chevy didnt have a V8 when that motor was built.
One best hi-school pal enjoyed free use of the family ’49 Olds 98 sedan.
(his mom didn’t drive). We spent much time together in this car on Tulsa streets til our graduation 1954.
It was really fast off the line because that hi-torque Rocket V-8 w/ 4-speed Hydramatic had about 4:1 first gear ratio plus a stump-puller rear axle used for ’98’s (shorter axle ratio than lighter Chevy-bodied 88’s).
My friend liked to ease-up engine in “drive” against the brakes til the frame twisted and “groaned” just before light change then leap across the intersection. He mastered this technique- nothing beat him to about 70mph even the hottest souped up flathead Fords.
Quick shifting Hydramatics on early Kettering-engined Cads and Olds were very efficient arguably faster 0-60 than rare stickshifts.
( Hydramatics also used behind early Mercedes big V-8’s with good results).
I grew up a generation too late, I guess. Cars of this era had style, they had performance, they had personality. Cars today, while they may be safer, and more reliable, they just don’t have the style and personality that cars of this vintage had.
The Art Deco font of the speedo numerals is great.
How did we ever get away from those overstuffed seats? They were pure comfort.
My Grandmother’s 1950 Buick’s seats were not “overstuffed”, but were higher off the floor. The “longer, lower, wider” styling trend of the 50’s did away with all that.
The Buick Special did have an OHV straight eight, but with only 248 CID it would not have matched the Olds performance with the manual transmission, never mind the dynaflow. The Roadmaster had 320 CID (150 or more HP), but the dynaflow would have been a handicap.
Thanks for the great article Paul-yes there was one time when GM built truly great cars. I know this article is about the ’51 Olds, but in 1954 my grandmother purchased a 1954 Oldsmobile 98. It was two tone, white over blue and I think it had about every option available; it didn’t have a/c but I’m not sure if it was available then. Riding in it was a tremendous experience, it made my parents ’54 Chevy seem truly plebian. I remember the burbling sound the V8 made and its effortless acceleration( a cousin of mine drove it once and claimed it got up 120 with little effort). What I best remember about it was the art deco like rocket on the hood. I think it also had an art deco font on the speedometer and instrument panel-a truly fantastic car. It was sad to see Olds decline and fail because of inept management and bean counters.
I grew up riding in a 54 Vauxhall Velox with a stylized airplane/rocket in chrome on the dash GM UK also copied the outer styling but not the engine 6 cylinders were deemed enough.
I think you could get factory AC. The 1954 was a new larger body car that went though 1956. Like a lot of cars through 1956 or so it was a trunk mounted unit which blew cold air forward through clear plastic ducts coming out of the rear shelf. There were air intakes added somewhere on the upper sides of the car, sometimes more integrated and sometimes not. Cars did not have any ventilation coming through the dashboard, but at some point most got cowl air ducted out grilles on the walls below the dashboard that did not go through the heater system like in all modern cars.
Jimmy is correct, that is a Chev in the hotrod. Valve covers are fakies.
http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Oldsmobile-Valve-Covers-for-Small-Block-Chevy,5056.html
Didn’t see this the first time. Fantastic piece, beautifully written, knowledgeable, plus the personal story. Thanks for rerunning it
11 passengers in a sedan. That’s uber.
I really enjoyed this article Paul! Thanks for running it again.
The lead photo is so beautifully composed that I’ve used it as one of many in my screensaver at work.
Wow, 11 Austrians in an Oldsmobile, that must have been a sight to see. Wonder when it became uncommon to stuff so many people in a vehicle like that over in Europe?
This article brings back memories from my youth about the 1950 Oldsmobile Rocket 88.
This was a true luxury car, it had the best sounding AM radio I’ve ever heard, great two tone fabric upholstery that looked like it came from an expensive suit, a clock on the dash, lights in the glove compartment, the trunk and even under the hood.
I remember the engine was 303.7 c.i. it was the first automobile I worked on. By about 1953 the 88 engine was increased to 324 c.i. and had higher lift rocker arms. I know this because I replaced the rocker arm assembly in the ’50 with the ’53’s scavenged from a wrecking yard – It gave a quite noticeable performance improvement.
I would also like to mention the Hydromatic worked well and smoothly. FYI it had a very low 1st gear as the fluid coupling did not multiply torque as the later automatics with torque converters did.
There are several additional things automotive enthusiasts might be interested in but let me close with one other fact from my own experience:
This 1950 Olds (303.7) had better acceleration and top speed than a new 1972 Mustang with a 302. But to be fair, 1972 was the year when all the cars manufactured in the U.S. were being hurriedly detuned to meet the new emissions regulations.
Oldsmobile’s “late stage geriatric image”. Must have forgot about the Aurora. When GM ended Oldsmobile, they were still using Aurora V-8’s for racing, they put Chevrolet stickers on the Oldsmobile engines.
Astute observation on throttle response. In that era, and until computers and throttle dashpots and idle kickers became prevalent, most vehicles had very linear throttle response. That facilitated smooth shifting up and down with manual transmission, and deft double-clutching for those non-syncro low gears of the day (as well as any gear changes in most trucks of the day.) I hate the intervention of the engine control system in my throttle use on computer controlled engines. The throttle isn’t allowed to snap shut for easy rev-matching, and it nearly precludes shifting without using the clutch, which a lot of us who were old time truck drivers did in our passenger vehicles from time to time (sometimes just for amusement.) Give me a good working carbureted engine any day!
Thank you for running that again, as I relative newcomer to the site I hadn’t read it before. Very interesting and bringing back memories of my own.
I was trying to describe the experience of being in Nana’s Ford Pop (103e) to my neice and her partner, I still can’t put my finger on the smell, it wasn’t quality materials! The other end of the automotive scale from the Oldsmobile, our family were ‘make do and mend’ right through the 1960s.
Car journeys weren’t unusual, but for me they were the best part of the day, not the event they were getting us to. I was interested in the differences between Nana’s Pop, Grandad’s Skoda and Dad’s VW, the route, the street furniture, the other cars, not the destination.
Here in frozen Midwest America, my Dad was an Olds Lifer (’50 88, ’52 98, ’55 Super 88, ’57 Fiesta wagon, ’59 Super 88, ’63 Starfire, ’66 Toronado.) And in our 1952 98 the catbird’s seat was on the rear seat armrest, which I rode all the way to San Diego and back.
Enjoying the article and great comments .
I no longer keep up with it but the early fuel injection systems often had an adjustment that one could tweak to allow faster return to idle .
I wish I could find it on my 201 Ranger, matching shifts is tricky with the slow return .
All these cars were great but slow and terribly dangerous to those of us who enjoyed rapid motorvating….
-Nate