Photos from the Cohort by Hyperpack.
Being in the public eye is tough. Celebrities, politicians and Youtubers know it. And then, product planners. After all, a product goes out there in the same fashion; to be tried, tested, and find love or scorn. And much like a celebrity, 1970s Pontiac was vying for a new public angle after its 1960s heyday receded. It was quite a turn, from 1960s sexy heartthrob to middle-aged Brougham actor.
Not that Pontiac face-planted in its newfound role. It did OK, actually. However, the discussion has remained, was it the best career move for the brand?
As many celebrities’ lives have shown, career turns are a risky -but inevitable- business. Some pull it off better than others. If during the 1960s Pontiac had been the equivalent of an automotive Steve McQueen (even if McQueen wasn’t a Pontiac kind of guy, at least in the ’60s), fashions had inevitably changed by the dawn of the new decade. It was time for a new role, but how to play it? Crowd pleaser or character actor?
Now, it’s hard for everyone to accept you’re no longer the hot number playing the lead role. For that certainly had been Pontiac’s place in GM’s lineup during the 1960s.
Ok, Cadillac was certainly on a roll at the time too. But that was a given. That old Cadillac prestige placed the brand in the rarefied realm of a stage veteran. Passing fads had nothing on it –yet. A Cary Grant of sorts, with decades passing but always managing to lead major productions. And despite age, looking ever dapper.
But back to Pontiac. As is well known, the brand had gone from an unnoticed cast member to a rock ‘n roll kind of reinvention. All thanks to some smarty pants management from Bunkie Knudsen and DeLorean, who added youth and verve to the ailing brand. From me-too Chevrolets to youthful, yet mature-looking vehicles filled with sophisticated masculine poise. A turnaround that has stuffed endless pages and is part of automotive lore.
But well, fashions pass and new trends come in. By the early ’70s, pop culture was moving away from fun-filled youthful escapades and everything was turning ever more serious. Oldsmobile took a good measure of the moment’s zeitgeist and moved to a leading role, becoming the 1970s megastar.
So; what should a slightly passé and overweight 1960s heartthrob turn into? Mark your own path or follow the leader?
As Pontiac’s career crisis began, some at CC have suggested the brand should have moved to the role of a character actor. Turn the brand’s cultured sporty virtues from the ’60s and adjust them to a new mold for the times. Offering “a snazzy, well-priced smaller car that was a cut above competitors (a redux of the original Tempest/LeMans strategy)… Pontiac could have served-up a nicely upscale, sporty compact offering to capture buyers”.
Something GM already pretty much offered with the Holden Monaro GTS in Australia.
Not the easiest and most obvious path. It was a move that no longer relied on charisma, brute force, and good looks, but required the hard work of a method actor. Kind of like turning Pontiac into a DeNiro or Nicholson (though neither quite fits the image); tough, dependable, and versatile enough to guarantee a long career. Not names –or qualities– that warrant a blockbuster, but that earn cred when mentioned.
But we know Pontiac stuck to the idea of remaining popular, in the way of following whatever it felt that was going to be so. Instead of a DeNiro or Nicholson, turning into a sort of Ryan O’Neal. Having the looks for the period, but somehow developing an erratic career and roaming into genres it probably shouldn’t have. All adding to a troubled life, filled with more misses than hits.
Of course, these career moves are an eternal source of discussion for the public. Sometimes they please, sometimes they don’t. On certain occasions, they just kill careers. And the Brougham Pontiac era is certainly among those divisive moves. There are fans and detractors.
So, I’ll leave it to you to decide if this Broughamified Catalina is Pontiac’s “Love Story” period… Or its “Oliver’s Story” era. Hit, or bust?
Those who know their Pontiacs are well aware the Catalina was the brand’s entry-level full-sizer. And the 1971-76 generation has a very devoted CC entry from a while back. If you want the mechanical specs and history of this generation of Catalinas, make sure to hit that link (further down).
Now, that older CC post featured a 1972 sedan. Today’s find is a ’73, and there wasn’t much new with Pontiac’s full-sizers from the previous year. Other than the obligatory styling updates, the biggest design news were the 5MPH mandatory bumpers.
Meanwhile, even if today’s find looks Broughamy enough, the officially-named Catalina Brougham had been dropped for ’73. As such, this Brougham-looking Pontiac is just a “plain” Catalina.
The model’s standard engine was a 350cid V-8, but today’s Cohort find carries the optional 400 cid V-8.
Starting in ’71, full-size Ponchos came with a wraparound cockpit. A period fad that was making its way around Detroit in those days. It appeared in its most extreme form in the ’69 LTD, and here we see it getting the Pontiac treatment.
Now, those seats seem to be wrapped in Pontiac’s own Morrokide fabric. Is this pristinely original, or painstakingly restored? Whatever the case, it’s quite the time warp to the early ’70s. I can see my 3-year-old self in my polyester shorts riding in this front bench with gusto.
As can be seen, today’s find has a partner; a sharp-looking Chevrolet Caprice. This time, we’re talking about an undisputed star who had a long career with staying power. It didn’t quite remain in the public’s eye throughout all those years, but it certainly knew how to earn its keep in what became a rather steady role.
To those of us of a certain age, who didn’t spend time in these? I certainly did. A few hours indeed, as a passenger in the rear seat (Yeap, taxi service!).
These cars were quite the lookers when launched in ’77. It’s true that once they became too common their design tautness lost some of its luster, but now that they’re rather scarce on the ground, their crisp lines can be appreciated anew.
The rear view of the coupe is certainly one of the car’s best angles. However, now that I think about it, I never rode on the nifty 2-door coupe with the cool rear glass window treatment.
And if you wonder about the photobombing Barracuda by the curb, it’s been featured at CC before.
However I feel about the Pontiacs of this period (looks like an Oldsmobile!), what can’t be argued is that by the 1970s GM was losing its touch as a manager of the stars. Pontiac may have had a few more hits here and there from this point on, but it was becoming ever more part of an ensemble cast. And playing ever less relevant roles.
But such is life for stars under the eye of a finicky public and poor management. From 1960s heartthrob to attending casting calls for Stallone’s The Expendables (2010), hoping to get one more role no matter how small. And in the end, realizing all your scenes ended up on the cutting room floor.
Related CC reading:
Curbside Classic: 1972 Pontiac Catalina – Getting More For Your Dollar
Interesting story! I have had a couple of sporty Pontiacs from 66 and 67. And also a 73 Bonneville wich is a totally different car. Rather dull, but a nice driver. Had the 400 engine.
Great story with such a good tie in to actors.
(BTW I think you meant Cary Grant)
As I look at GM I cannot understand (but then I’m only 61 and wasn’t really looking at cars closely then) why did every division need to have a step up full sized entry?
So, in my head, make the Chevrolet BelAir/Biscayne, then moving up, have the Catalina, etc.
My guess is market share, and I get that! I was a sales manager for many years. Give em what they’ll buy!
But it seems rather ridiculous to me to have every division fighting for the same customer.
My two cents-no change
Oops, yes, Cary Grant. It’s fixed now.
Just before emission controls messed everything up in 1974.
1973 wasn’t very good, either. Our Century wagon never failed to die when put in gear after a cold start.
In 1973 some friends contracted a Drive-A-Way car to escape the Gas Crisis Disaster in Florida and return to upstate NY.
It was a coupe of this, no vinyl top, poop brown, radio delete (with wood grain delete plate).
I surmised the owner had died of old age and the relatives wanted the car.
In 1973 my high school driver’s ed program had one of these on loan from the local Pontiac dealer. I’d practice driving at home with my parents’ Volvo then go to school for lessons in this behemoth. The gym teacher / driver’s ed instructor threatened to tie me to the door post if I didn’t stop leaning toward the center of the car so I could see over its 5-acre hood.
Brougham Chip, well when you are GM in the 1960’s with a market share of 60% the guys running Pontiac see not Ford but Chevrolet as their biggest competition. Same thing with the guys running Buick, Olds is just as big of a competitor as Chrysler or Mercury.
Kind of a lousy way to run a car company when your market share is only 30% and your sales are off a few million units from their peak(GM in the 80s) But this did work when you were the 500lb gorilla in the room like GM used to be.
As for the 1970s full size cars, man Pontiacs were UGLY. The Catalina and Bonneville fell so damn hard compared to the beautiful 1960’s models. Not to mention how shoddily built these were compared to the 1960s big Pontiacs.
I did my driver’s ed in a green ’73 Catalina. Parallel parking was mandatory. Coach picked a spot in the park with two cones. If you hit a cone, you did it again till you got it right. Since my sister gave me some initial time behind the wheel of her Karmann Ghia, it took me two attempts with the Pontiac.
NOTE: the coldest A/C known on earth in the humid Middle South.
A car like this *did* have a starring role in a particularly famous car chase…
https://www.google.com/search?q=the+seven+ups+car+chase&rlz=1C1GCEU_enUS997US997&oq=the+seven+ups&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgDEAAYgAQyCggAEAAY4wIYgAQyBwgBEC4YgAQyBwgCEAAYgAQyBwgDEAAYgAQyBwgEEAAYgAQyBwgFEAAYgAQyBwgGEAAYgAQyBwgHEC4YgAQyBwgIEAAYgAQyBwgJEAAYgATSAQg5MDI1ajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:d3fe2e6f,vid:9vACWV5sRcY,st:0
Interesting use of a simile, Rich…. cars as aging movie stars. I suppose the late ’70s Lincoln Continentals are Gloria Swanson in “Sunset Boulevard”: “I AM big… it’s the PICTURES (cars?) that got small!”
I’ve always thought that the front of this car resembled a 1958 Edsel.
Ouch.
I think full-size Pontiacs lost their mojo in 1969, when the Grand Prix was moved to the intermediate chassis. Through 1968, you could close one eye and squint with the other and imagine your Catalina coupe was a Grand Prix. And JZD turned Pontiac into a “youth(ful)” brand, and by 1969 “the youths” didn’t want full-size cars.
Now I’m not saying that the big Ponchos were dead by 1969; they still sold plenty. But their buyers were getting hard to define.
Not the best era of the full sized Pontiac’s but I’ve always liked the 1973 styling the best when it comes to the 1971-76 full sized Pontiac’s, this is coming from someone who normally favors the 1971-72 GM biggies over the later years.
My parent’s purchased a 1973 Catalina with the 400 and a 2 barrel. It was a maroon sedan with a black vinyl top and that same interior in black cloth. Hands down one of the most dependable cars we had as a family. In 1977 somehow I convinced my parents to allow me to take that car on Spring Break with 5 friends to New Orleans…. still don’t know how they agreed to that. But it was a very capable and comfortable ride.
One of my friends named it the “Maroon Prune” and that is what is was called until it was traded, sadly, for a super boring and underwhelming 1979 silver Chevrolet Impala (left over and sitting on the lot in April of 1980). The Catalina was by far a superior vehicle.
To me, of all the full-sized entities of GM on that design cycle (generation), the 1971-1972 Buicks looked the best. Especially the Centurion and LeSabre two door hard tops and convertibles.
Next in line to me are the 1971-1972 Oldsmobile 88s and 98s and then the ’71-’72 Pontiac Bonnevilles and Catalinas.
Such an ugly face on this one! I remember as a kid really liking the looks of the 1972 B-body Pontiacs (one of which lived next door), thinking they were nicer than the 1971 models, but then feeling that everything went south with the ‘73s.
I’m also not sure that a mere Catalina was much of an upgrade over an Impala. It seems that one had to move up to a Bonneville to get a palpably nicer interior, but by then you might be better off with a well-equipped Delta 88 or LeSabre Custom/Centurion for nearly the same money. The Sloan ladder was truly compressing by the early 1970s, leaving buyers to make purchase decisions based on minor details and/or local dealer reputation.
I thought then and still think that the 4 door sedan body style of this generation of big GM car made the car look cheap. The pre-1971 models would at least clad the upper door frames with stainless trim that would dress the sedans up. But these were all painted body color, which often really stood out on a car with a contrasting vinyl roof like this one. The 4 door hardtops looked much more upscale.
That Chevrolet 2 door is the spitting image of the Impala coupe my law school roommate bought a year or so before we graduated. His may have had a vinyl roof, but if so, it was in the same shade of blue as the rest of the car.
There were a lot of these around my part of town. Cheap family rides. No – they weren’t sexy and they weren’t awesome Pontiacs, but they filled the bill for lots of blue collar family folks who were just happy to have a new set of wheels back in 1973.
It actually would be a quite a nice front end design, if not for those awful 5 MPH bumpers. I found this photo of a ’73 Safari wagon online, which has obviously undergone a much-needed front bumper tuck. Much, much better.
Pontiac Rally II wheels (or custom alloys), also help considerably in making these beasts, look a little more svelte.
Enormously better…the smaller bumper provides you a much better sense of the center part of the grille moving all the way behind and under the bumper. I imagine this is much closer to what the designers intended. Tighten it up by half again and it would look quite handsome imo.
I was under the age of seven, when GM introduced this generation of B-Bodies. And I could detect then, they were all essentially the same size, and basic look. With different handling of body styling and trim, for each General Motors division. I didn’t know what the term ‘redundant’ meant. But that was essentially how I viewed them. Why build so many versions of the same car? Without knowing as a little kid, that some were meant to appear more luxurious for example, and sell for more money. It just seemed silly to me then, that so many styling variations on the same sedans or wagons, were necessary. Especially, when some styling details appeared less attractive on different brands.
Badge engineering as it became known. These B body’s did not have the characteristics of their 60s older brothers and sisters. The ride was jiggly. It became known later as the B Body jiggle. The 60s versions rode far better and enjoyed a superior power to weight ratio.
My friend’s parents has a 71 Catalina 2dr HT, equipped with a 455 turbo 400 ans 355 gears. Fat superior power And ride quality compared to the Catalina’s just a year or 2 later. Pontiac wasn’t building excitement anymore unless your pick was a Formula, Trans Am, or A Body T37- GTO..By 73 it was all but over save the F body.
My parents had a 73 Catalina when I was in high school, that was one tough car. Took the abuse of three kids driving it as well as towing the boat, general family travel and hauled the five of us all over. It was pretty reliable until it got to about 200,000 miles, then it started to slowly go downhill. Radiator leaked, broke(!) a timing chain that we replaced at about 100k, was very hard to start (i’m guessing the constant driving around overheated had something to do with that). Finally one day it didn’t have enough power to move, which was fine as the Turbo 400 was hanging on by a thread anyway. Most notably I once had 13 kids in it on the way to the movie and it still could make some tire noise from a stop.
I had a specific fetish for the 1973 Pontiac as a kid. It was based on the movie “The Seven Ups”, where stunt driver and actor Bill Hickman beats the daylights out of a 1973 Pontiac Grandville four door hardtop while escaping Roy Scheider in pursuit through NYC in a similar vintage Pontiac Ventura.
I have yet to find a Grandville four door these days. All preserved examples seem to be convertibles.
Bill Hickman did work in “Bullitt” as well.
Supposedly, the sound effects from “Bullitt” (screeching tires, heavy duty exhaust note) were used for the asthmatic ’73 Pontiac Ventura in “The Seven Ups”.
We had a 71 brown 2 door. 10 year old me thought it was cool with the big beak. In retrospect it looks a bit cartoonish, but at least it’s distinctive and had integrated bumpers. Personally, I like the 72 best, which seems less exaggerated but still very Pontiac. I was also a fan on the 76 (we had one) with the rectangular headlights (which were nicely integrated), though there wasn’t much Pontiac about it…to the poster’s point it coulda been a Buick. But the 73 is just uninteresting to me (not helped at all by that front bumper) and the most incomprehensible tailights for a Pontiac.