–
Just west of Huntsville Texas, there is an old coupe still providing a service of sorts. It is unlikely that anything on it will break the way it’s being used and it has been painted in defense against the few straggling Tin Worms that have managed to survive in the area. These days it spends its days as a bar sign, but it’s also a sign of times gone by. Once upon a time, this was a 1935 Chevrolet.
This car is a little further beyond just being a non-runner. But it has been “restored” in some fashion. Need replacement parts for a 1935 Chevy? No problem, let’s just head down to Home Depot or Lowe’s! There is no glass with the exception of the headlights and a single taillight; all the other “windows” are gray-painted plywood. On the passenger side, the entire door is painted plywood. The driver’s door has a vent window that helped to identify it, but our faux passenger door does not.
In my opinion, this is not a business coupe. At the time I took the photos, I assumed it was just a run of the mill cheap family Chevy coupe for a couple or small family. You might have originally found a rumble seat for two additional passengers in the trunk. That was a big selling point in the ads of the day. After a little research it appears to be a 1935 Chevy Master Deluxe Sport Coupe, as pictured above. The fenders, roofline and that unusual vent window all match. Our featured car is one of 11,904 Sport Coupes, which could be had either with a rumble seat or a conventional trunk.
It is not noticeable from the street but the rear window is also plywood and the trunk lid is roofing or siding material. No more rumble seat rides in this car. The lines are quite a bit different than the ’41 Dodge Business coupe CC, but then, this is an older car. There was quite a change in car design between the Thirties and the Forties. The bumpers on our four-wheeled sign do not appear to be original. Anyone know what they’re off of?
Here’s another ’35 Chevy coupe. It appears to be the very same model as the black and white ad further up. See how much car illustrations varied from the real thing back then? Call it artistic license. Still, buyers may have been a little disappointed when they visited a showroom and saw how different the real thing looked. Nevertheless, this was quite a handsome car in its day.
1935 was a big year for Chevy as Master Deluxes were all new. A second series, the Standard, was basically a slightly retrimmed 1934 Chevrolet.
A big selling feature on Masters was a “Turret Top”, eliminating the rubberized roof covering in the center of the roof for an all-steel version. This was a big step forward in car design, and would become an industry standard. Another new feature was Knee-Action suspension, Chevrolet’s new independent front suspension. All Chevys were still powered by the Blue Flame Six, still a spring chicken in those days.
Chevy had a lot of new features in ’35, but that didn’t help sales all that much. While sales of 548,215 was nothing to be ashamed about, that figure was a couple thousand shy of 1934’s figure of 551,371. Part of it may have been the slightly bulbous styling of the Master Deluxes, as sales of the Standard went from 98,959 in ’34 to 201,773 in ’35.
As for our bar sign, it may no longer be a runner, but it reminds us of what once was. At least it’s still here, not something most 77 year old cars can say.
Unfortunately, it looks like some customer with a bit over the .08 blood alcohol level was a bit amiss in backing out of the parking lot. That should leave the driver free and clear (it’s not a running car, the parking lot is private property and not street) but given the ways they ticket DUI anymore, I wouldn’t be on it.
Part of the sales drop no doubt had to do with the national economics at the time. While 1934 was the first real sign that the economy may turn around, ’35 wasn’t any better so shoppers probably reigned in their enthusiasm a bit. The jump in numbers for the Standard are evidence of that. In 1935, Hupp’s final burst of enthusiasm, the Aerodynamic, was well on it’s way to settling in to moribund-ness, Auburn was definitely hurting (the ’34’s didn’t sell all that well), and Dusenberg was quietly disappearing. Auto sales wouldn’t really pick up until ’37, and then do a mini-crash in ’38 killing that short burst of enthusiasm.
For whatever reason, the economy did not hurt Ford as badly as it hurt Chevrolet in 1935. Perhaps folks liked the Ford’s styling better, and the chassis and engine of Henry’s V8 were still relatively up-to-date. I know that my grandparents put one more chalk mark in the Ford column in ’35. 1935 would be the last year that Ford would outsell Chevrolet until 1957.
I am no expert on Chevy 6s, so a quick check at Wiki reveals that this car was still a couple of years away from the 2nd generation stovebolt engine that came out in 1937 and remained in use into the early 60s. I did not see much written on the Gen1 engine that went back to 1929 and vaulted Chevrolet into the big leagues with a 6 for the price of a 4. Can any oldtimers tell us how good the early Chevy 6 really was?
With the family history of the 35 Ford (that lasted my farming grandparents into the early 50s) and my respect for that era’s Plymouths, I have never really been drawn into the orbit of these cars. However, they are certainly attractive designs (though not so much so as the drawings).
I will add one plug for the turret top. Having owned a Model A at one time, I can attest to what a nightmare it was to keep the seam sealed between the metal parts of the roof and the fabric center section. The fabric part was fine, but the welting that filled the seam was always a problem. My car was never really watertight. Old timers have told me that it was not uncommon to slather roofing tar over those seams when these were just crappy old cars. It didn’t look very good, but it kept the water out. The turret top was a huge advance.
Chevy 6 went through quite a few changes since the 1929 introduction. Up to 1937 they were 3-main bearing with splash oiling. 1939 went to 4 main bearings + “pump-assisted splash oiling”.
My 1936 Chevy 6 (original and un-rebuilt) runs very well, although one babbitt bearing is worn, producing a thumping sound at warmed-up idle. Very strong, yet economical engines, they were very popular with folks who didn’t see the need for speed. Mine is a half-ton truck with a wood station wagon body, geared for hauling. I can go around a corner at 10 mph in high gear and it pulls hard. Out of breath by 40, though. Advertised at the time as capable of more work in a day than a 4 cylinder at the same price.
The Ford V-8’s were prone to overheating, but fast. The Chevies were reliable workhorses. I don’t know enough about other brands.
The Chevy 6 was introduced in 1929 at 194 c.i. displacement. 1933 saw increase to 206.5. In ’37 a revised design debuted at 216 ci.. This design, with updates, powered my 1982 Chevy pickup. Still a great machine, if not fast.
I’m always befuddled by the multitude of body styles offered in the ’30s and ’40s.
Does anyone know what the difference was between the Master Deluxe “Coupe” and “Sport Coupe”? From the illustrations, it looks like the Sport Coupe lacked a rear side window, while the Coupe had one. I can’t make out the prices well enough to tell which one was more expensive. Note that the 1934-bodied Standard came in only one version of the concept, called a Coupe, but it looks more like the Master Deluxe Sport Coupe (no rear side window) than the Master Deluxe Coupe.
Without the rumble seat, did either the Coupe or the Sport Coupe have a rear seat? There doesn’t seem to be a business coupe, unless Chevy didn’t see fit to include it in an advertisment of this type (I have no idea when it became common for automkers to offer business coupes), but perhaps one of these could have been ordered in such a way as to more-or-less serve the same purpose.
How about the Master Deluxe “Town Sedan” and “Coach”? From the illustrations, It looks like the Town Sedan has a trunk at the rear, like the four-door “Sport Sedan”, while the Coach doesn’t, like the four-door “Sedan”. The Standard came only as a trunkless Coach and Sedan.
Suicide doors in the front on the “Master” series; and slightly different fender lines. The Standard fenders flow; the Master fenders are puffed up.
Hi, I just inherited my father original, unrestored 1935 Master Deluxe Coach. Incredible vehicle. No trunk making it surprisingly large inside. Large steering wheel makes it relatively easy to turn ( much easier than my brothers ’49 GMC pick up). Knee action suspension modules at the front corners are monsters!!
Not sure about the 35 but from the sales data book for 1937 body styles are
Sport sedan (master Deluxe and Master)
Business Coupe Master Deluxe and master)
Town Sedan (Master Deluxe and Master
Sedan (Master Deluxe and master)
Sport Coupe(with rumble seat) ( Master Deluxe only
Coach( Master Deluxe and master
Cabriolet (with rumble seat)( Master Deluxe only
It looks as if Bonnie and Clyde may have driven thru town in this old guy.
A fiting tribute I say……..
Although I believe that Clyde was a Ford guy. Clyde Barrow was reputed to have written a fan letter to Henry Ford about what a great car the Ford V8 was and how he always drove Fords if he could get away with one.
Literally “get away with one”, as in steal one. I believe I recall seeing a copy of that letter once.
A small detail that I did overlook. Clyde was a decidedly Ford guy.
Is this car for sale??
I have own a 35 chevy master delux sport coupe for 34 years. the bumpers are correct. the headlights are not correct, I think they are from a truck. I think all the sport coupes had rumble seats
Hello Bob,
Would you be interested in selling 1935 Chevy coupe? If so please contact me at lourogokos@yahoo.com or 323-228-5297.
Thank you
Lou
Here’s my 3 window project. 6 months looking for doors, ended up buying a 5 window barn find so I could use the doors for the 3 window.
cory, is the back half of the barn find still available for sale? (29Dec2020)
here is my 1935 Chevrolet Master Deluxe Sport Coupe that my neighbor restored back in the 1960’s. Never in my wildest dreams did I ever imagine someday being the owner. I am fortunate this car is NOS.
Hello John,
Would you be interested in selling 1935 Chevy coupe? If so please contact me at lourogokos@yahoo.com or 323-228-5297.
Thank you
Lou
Hello John
Would you be interested in selling 35 coupe?
Hello John did you get my message?
Hello John,
I hope all is well. Are you interested in selling your 35 chevy? if so please respond to email. thanks