(first posted 8/29/2012) The longer you look at this car, the less sense it makes: A sedan with doors and trunk made completely of wood? Conceived and built just shortly after sleek, streamlined all-steel bodies with their myriad advantages had finally become ubiquitous? Well, that pretty much explains it already—going against the grain can be highly fashionable; always was, and always will be, never mind the sacrifices involved.
Sure, I’ll pay 50% more for a 1946 Chrysler six-cylinder sedan, as long as it comes with wooden doors and trunk—because I can, and you can’t.
On second thought, it makes all the sense in the world.
Woody wagons have a long history that dates back to the horse-drawn “station wagons” that met arriving guests at the train station. Of course, nobody bought a woody as their primary personal transportation; they were commercial vehicles under the domain of hotels and resorts. If you could afford to, you kept one at your hunting lodge or summer house. Increasingly, the fine joinery and varnish of wood-bodied vehicles became the province of the affluent–just not as their daily drivers.
Chrysler’s 1941 Town and Country changed all that. According to Richard Langworth’s “Chrysler and Imperial“, Paul Hafer, of Boyertown Body Works, first doodled a sketch of a jaunty wagon that he titled “Town and Country”. At the time, virtually every city-dweller who was well-off had a place in the country, and here was a vehicle that would look smart in both places and on the drive between them.
Chrysler President David Wallace picked up on the idea and made it happen. Although technically station wagons, they were unlike any that came before, with a sloping, solid steel roof borrowed from Chrysler’s long-wheelbase limousine. Streamline Moderne meets the Wild West. Which is pretty much where America’s consciousness was at the time: straddling two very different worlds. The Town and Country, in its name and form encompasses the era when neither one had yet dominated the other. But that wouldn’t last long.
The original T&C wagon was a proto-crossover: It was groundbreaking in the manner of the first Audi Avant wagon, which defined the modern sports wagon. Wagons don’t have to be just haulers of kids and kit; they can can be fashionable and sporty too. It’s something that had to be rediscovered more than once, although there was nothing country about it the second time.
The 1941 – 1942 Town and Country generated popular enthusiasm, yet only about a thousand were sold in each of its two years of production. Despite that, Chrysler sensed it was on to a good thing, and made plans to expand the Town & Country into an entire family of cars after the war.
The 1946 T & C brochure shows five models; somewhat curiously, none of them was a wagon. And of the five, only two were ever built in quantity: The four door sedan…
…and the convertible, which was built on the longer eight-cylinder chassis. Not surprisingly, the convertible turned out to be the bigger seller, as well as a high-fashion accessory during its first few years. Several Hollywood stars, including Clark Gable, Bob Hope, Barbara Stanwyck and others, joined the ranks of T & C glitterati. The Chrysler was hardly a Duesenberg in its dynamic qualities, but that was then. In 1946, this was it.
This hardtop Custom Club Coupe is one of the models that didn’t go into production, although seven of them were built using a sectioned and lengthened Chrysler coupe roof covered in padded vinyl and mounted on the convertible body.
imagesource: carphotosbyrichard
It was a seminal vehicle that not only beat GM’s famous hardtop coupes by several years, but also launched the padded roof craze. For whatever reason, Chrysler didn’t put it into production and missed ushering in the hardtop era.
The Roadster, a convertible version of the three-passenger business coupe, foreshadowed the 1949 Dodge Wayfarer. It harked back to the popular Roadsters of the twenties and thirties, but never made it to the saw mill.
The last of the stillborn Town and Countrys was the Brougham; at the time, the term referred to a two-door body style, not any car with a vinyl roof and Brougham badges.
Before taking a closer look at our featured car, let’s close out the original T&C era. The new “second-series” 1949s arrived in convertible and wagon forms, but now with wood planking affixed to the steel body and Di-Noc replacing the mahogany veneer.
The later ones omitted the Di-Noc altogether, and just featured the planking. And the hardtop finally showed up. Was the end in sight?
And the sedan was gone and a real station wagon was back. But fashion is fickle; and the glamorous post-war woody era ended quickly. After 1950 the T & C name was history–at least until being revived for a different fashion era altogether.
So let’s look at what we stumbled onto the other day on our annual blackberry-picking bike ride. Although I’ve stopped making assumptions about what I will or won’t find on the street, don’t think I wasn’t a wee bit surprised to see this sitting at a curb near downtown. Car shows? Who needs ’em? One of these days, there will be a Duesenberg waiting for me at the curb.
There’s simply no way to do the usual design critique of this car; from almost any traditional vantage point that considers a car as a whole or unified entity, it’s a total nightmare, a Frankenstein on wheels. Even the conventional Chryslers of this vintage are a bit challenging, design-wise; essentially, it had a 1939 body that Chrysler tried to update with a more modern front end year after year. The result is a front end that looks about a foot too wide and long for the rest of the car. And the wood planking only accentuates the effect.
But check out the rear end: Wow! Maybe this is why the sedan was a short-lived idea. This really is wild, but never mind; all design conventions must be tossed aside…
…just as they so often have been over the decades, for the sack sake of fashion.
So let’s try that again. This time we’ll move in a bit closer and focus on the details. This is not exactly a cohesive vehicle, but the parts are to die for. There’s enough sparkling orthodontia on the front to dazzle the most hard-boiled minimalist. And that color! Delicious, like a giant caramel. It’s called Palace Brick Brown, and was a special order color on Chryslers of this vintage. How do I know that? Because at right about this point, on my second go-around, the owner appeared after having finished his business at the Post Office.
Dick Romm bought this gem in 1971, for $775, from a man in West Eugene. Good call, especially since it had traveled only 56,000 miles, and spent most of its life in a garage; if it hadn’t, it probably wouldn’t be here today. Chrysler spelled out quite clearly to T & C owners that they would have maintenance issues with the wood body. Avoiding rain and too much sun is the key to longevity. At the time Dick bought the car it had a bit of dry rot, which he attended to right away.
The most problematic areas are the curved mahogany veneer panels in the front doors and the trunk. These have been replaced, but there remain a few minor imperfections. In Dick’s own words: I had the dry rot fixed in Portland immediately upon purchasing the car, but that’s all they did; they didn’t do any refinishing. The interior was in pretty bad shape; it was a maroon plastic saran material surrounded by leather. In 1989, after saving enough dollars and being unsuccessful in finding any Oregon firms to refinish the wood, I drove the car to San Leandro, CA, where they completely refinished the original ash (the light-colored wood) and replaced, as necessary, some of the dark mahogany veneer which had peeled and/or disintegrated over the years.
Forget all the nasty things I said earlier; I’m swooning. The interiors of cars of this vintage are inevitably splendid, and this Chrysler has some killer touches.
Like this amazing radio. Have you ever seen a finer one?
Not convinced? How about from this angle? Wouldn’t that cheer you up every time you slid into the front seat?
It’s the 1946 counterpart to Tesla’s giant screen. The latest in high tech, 70 years apart.
Dick told me that the interior was originally maroon, and that he found it in rough shape: With the help of the actual build sheet from Chrysler, I discovered that the Palace Brick Brown color of the car was quite rare in 1946–in fact, it was a special order color. In the course of the metal part of the body ‘restoration’ (that began in 1999), we were able to match the paint to the original. The maroon interior really didn’t complement the exterior color, so I decided to use a more appropriate color scheme for both the seats and the dashboard.
The seats are now Bedford cord and leather, which was a Chrysler option for these cars as an alternative to the saran. The metal body restoration was done by Jeff Haag in Alvadore, OR, and what a wonderful job he did. It included any necessary bodywork and an exquisite paint job, including the difficult job of two-toning the dashboard, both metal and plastic parts. This two-toning also was a regular Chrysler offering, even though the original dash was all maroon. I took almost all the chrome off the car and had it redone in Canada.
Before we leave that roomy back seat, here’s what a door made out of ash framing looks like. Unfortunately, I can’t let you feel it, but as a wannabe woodworker, I’m smitten. Presumably, that groove along the top of the door channels water down instead of allowing it in. The idea of driving this during our winters gives me the willies.
Let’s take second look at the trunk while thinking of it in terms of its namesake: a wooden trunk, or pirate’s chest instead of in the automotive idiom. A trunk with hinges that aren’t going to give up the ghost anytime soon, even if buried for centuries. The hinges, like all the other hardware on this car, are massive and of very high quality. Which brings home a point: There’s no way to correlate the price of a car like this to modern reality using an inflation adjuster. Its original price of $2,366 adjusts to about $27,000 in today’s money. Good luck to anyone trying to build one for that today–try maybe $270k. These cars were built when skilled labor was still cheap, and plenty of it went into each one of them.
As it turned out, the challenges of the mahogany veneer soon became too much. In late 1947 it was replaced by Di-Noc between the ash planks, and most folks were fine with it. Let’s take a look into the treasure chest.
Ample, indeed. Jimmy Hoffa would have been comfortable on his last ride. Looks like the last vestiges of the original maroon interior.
Turns out that snappy little badge on the bumper is there for a reason. The narrower wood trunk necessitated cutting down the standard bumper, and this plate hides the seam. Nice lettering.
And if the trunk isn’t adequate, the standard roof rack is ready to gobble up more trunks. Thule, eat your heart out. It just needs a ladder to get up there, like the old buses.
Can’t not stop and stoop in reverence to the fine hubcaps and “gum-dipped” Firestones. Due to rubber shortages, in 1946 whitewalls weren’t available, so all these cars wore white “spats” instead of chrome trim rings, as in the brochure pictures above.
Time to take in the more prosaic parts of this wooden wonder, like the engine. Most of the T&C sedans were built on the 121.5″ wheelbase six cylinder chassis, and motivated by the famous Chrysler flat head six; about 100 were built on the eight cylinder chassis. Optimistically called “Spitfire”, its 250 cubic inches churned out 114 hp. The fact that all that wood added some 400 additional pounds helps explain why all-steel bodies were such a boon, as well as why nobody talked about these cars in terms of their sparkling performance.
Of course, the Fluid Drive didn’t exactly add to that rep. Now, we could go off on a tangent and spend quite a bit of time on Fluid Drive, and thanks to Chrysler marketing two completely different systems under the same name only adds to the confusion. The basic fluid drive was a three speed manual with its clutch, but with a fluid coupling ahead of it. In essence, one could start and stop in any gear without having to use the clutch, but third gears starts were glacial. The clutch was needed if one wanted to change gears.
But this Chrysler has the semi-automatic Fluid Drive, also known as “Vacamatic” and other marketing gobbledegook. It too had a fluid coupling, but behind it was a two-speed semi-automatic transmission with integral underdrive that worked on both gears, resulting on four speeds, and a clutch as well. One normally just used High Range, and the car would take off in underdrive (“3rd” gear); when the driver wanted to shift into High-Direct, he just lifted off the accelerator and the shift took place, (semi)automatically. Low Range was used for starting on steep hills and such. And the clutch had to be used to shift between High and Low Range, as well as Reverse. Confused? Allpar has an excellent article explaining them both.
It was Chrysler’s answer to GM’s Hydramatic, and some loved it for its simplicity and control. Others said it had all of the disadvantages of a manual shift, and none of the advantages.
Dick has this to add about his car’s mechanical issues: Mechanical work included an overhaul of the engine in the ’70s, which would have been unnecessary except due to the fact that during the cars long hiatus in my garage while I was saving money and doing other things (like a full time job!), water must have seeped into the cylinders through a leaky head gasket; they caused rust and basically locked up the engine.
At the same time we used the original fluid drive transmission plus one from a 1951 Chrysler to build one good transmission. A new wiring loom was also installed in 2000 for safety. Brakes, rear axle bearings, and several other minor items were also ‘renewed.’ Other than general maintenance plus a muffler (still in good shape from its purchase from Midas in the 70s), water pump, and a used exhaust manifold to replace the warped original, that’s about it.
Dick has put some 20,000 miles on the car since acquiring it, including the trip to California, and numerous regional trips as well as tours with the Walter P. Chrysler club he belongs to. And he tries to drive it at least every two weeks, except in the rain, of course. That’s why it was sitting near the post office, on this sunny day.
Dick hit the starter, and the Spitfire six muttered to life. The shift lever headed for High Range, and he and the Chrysler majestically ooze off down Fifth Avenue, like a classic wooden power boat, right down to the sound. The only thing missing was a wake in the road behind them.
With all of our considerations of practicality and efficiency, we forget that one good reason for cars like this to exist is just because they are beautiful.
Indeed. Just that radio is to die for. Love that cool bumper badge too! No wonder the owner looks so happy. Kudos to him for keeping that beauty rolling on the streets (NB. now, where is that Duesenberg hiding?).
I have that same radio in a Philco A-801 Chairside and they sound amazing.
They took a car radio put it in a cabinet and made it 120 volts ac from the factory.
The A-801 was introduced by Philco in early 1942, after the U.S. entered WWII. Philco built these radios to make use of excess car radio inventory (no longer sell able because of the cessation of car manufacturing).
That’s an interesting concept – the combination end table/radio. Beautiful piece of furniture though. Never seen anything quite like it. Were these at all common, and did other companies make them too?
Most all the big names in radio of the era made chairside radios and chairside radio phono combos from the 30’s into the 40’s.
The Philco A-801 was the only one i’m aware of that adapted a car radio for that purpose though i think i saw a Motorola version once but i’m not sure.
Eye-catching, certainly. Beautiful, well…
Although like Paul, I do really like the interior. I have a soft spot for the look of Bakelite and other early consumer-grade plastics. (The material here is actually Tenite, which is cellulose-based, rather than formaldehyde resin like Bakelite.)
Awesome find there really cant be many left especially in that condition.
Nope, although with a car like this, the survival rate is going to be better, proportionally, than with a run-of-the-mill ChryslerCo model. Even with the six, the T&C cost a bit more than a Cadillac Series 62 sedan and the eight was getting on to 20% more than the Cadillac — not the sort of car that tends to end up in a junkyard unless it suffers a really serious accident.
Paul, you keep topping yourself with these entries. I’m as giddy as the owner with his big smile in the picture. I’m moving to Eugene.
Breathtaking car!
Paul, you screwed up the entire photo spread by inserting that Audi – if you either remove it or put it as a footnote, this would be the most beautiful photo essay I’ve ever seen…
That being said, this and those have to be among the most gorgeous if not practical vehicles ever built.
Talk about gun-slit windows! They’re certainly nothing new, are they?
I would love to look over one of these in person and drive one. I imagine that radio sounds pretty good as only vacuum tubes can – with a decent speaker, of course!
Other than that ugly (relative to the subject) Audi, this is outstanding! I’m going to spend more time poring over the photos later…
If that’s all it takes…the Audi is gone!
this car is like a galleon with a juke-box in it 😀 !! I can imagine the work restoring the curved mahogany panels, really amazing !
Precisely, you nailed it! Stunning, I’m speechless.
Yep, this is the Wurlizter 1015 of cars.
You realize, of course, I was kidding when I asked you to find us a wooden Town & Country in Eugene. Wow. I am smitten with Chryslers of this era – the old-school simplicity coupled with highest quality parts. One of these (preferrably a Chrysler or DeSoto) remains on my bucket list to own someday.
The thing I never understood about these cars (or Chrysler in general in these years) was how hard it was to get an 8 cylinder car. The six was, of course, an excellent engine. In a Plymouth, Dodge or Desoto. But you had to go to a New Yorker to get an eight. They wouldn’t even put an eight in one of these T&C sedans that cost more than a Cadillac. In the whole Chrysler line, the six was in some huge percentage of production.
One point on the transmission – I had understood that the semi-automatic was actually a 4 speed unit. 1st and 2nd gears constituted Low range, while 3rd and 4th gears were High range. In normal operation, you put it in high and drove it like a 2 speed, starting in 3rd with a vacuum shift to 4th. I would imagine that the ratios were quite unlike normal 4 speeds, and both first and second must have been quite low.
Finally, I love a story like this – an owner who rescues a car and slowly over decades brings it back to life, but still enjoys getting out for regular use. “Hmmm – I think I’ll fire up the Chrysler and go get some stamps.” It is guys like this that keep me from completely losing faith in the old car hobby. And of course, you told the story of the man and his car exceedingly well. This has to be your best-ever trip for blackberries.
“Old-school simplicity coupled with highest quality parts.”
I just do not get how they went from making these anvil/Swiss watch hybrids to the tin cans of ’57 in less than a decade. We can blame the whole postwar B-school ethos of cheap volume above all that infected the whole culture. Still, the hollowing out of something as complicated, expensive and potentially dangerous as an automobile makes the decline seem more drastic than, say, the emergence of Wonder Bread. (Although postwar food is dangerous too, as the “hollowing out” of the diet with cheap starch products keeps making Americans fatter.)
Chrysler history has always been fascinating to me (well, Duh!). The company always seemed to conform to the personality of the man at the top, whoever that was. I think that the only time it was a complete company offering style, quality and engineering was under Walter Chrysler, who built it from nothing but a nearly bankrupt Maxwell into a company second only to GM. AFter he died, K. T. Keller took over and engineering finally got the upper hand and got Ray Dietich the stylist kicked out. The company has seemed to lose ground and lurch from crisis to crisis ever since (althouth with these periodic maddening flashes of brilliance.)
The Apple of automakers? But with no second coming of WPC.
“The company always seemed to conform to the personality of the man at the top, whoever that was.”
Interesting observation, and it goes a long way to explaining Mother Mopar’s bipolar condition.
You gave me an opening to brag a little and get on my soapbox. After my sweets and carbohydrate obsessed wife left me in May, I went on the Atkins diet. I’ve lost 50 pounds with 50 left to go. I don’t get hungry all the time (other than normal dinnertime hunger), I don’t crave food as a reward, and I have more energy. I completely agree that starches (and high fructose corn syrup) are why we are turning into a nations of blobs. Hell, check the nutritional label the next time you’re at the grocery store, they even put HCFS in sausages for Christ’s sake. Why the Fark is corn syrup in a Polish Kielbasa????
Anyways, nice car! Totally impracticable as a daily driver, but if you could afford one of these, you could afford a steel bodied car as your daily driver. All it needs is the First Navy Jack on the front bumper and a USA flag at the rear and it’s all set for parades.
Congratulations. Off topic, but yes, HCFS and refined starches are practically poison, in any kind of quantity.
Y’all mean HFCS, right? High fructose corn syrup? All I know is it doesn’t fool my taste buds into thinking it’s real cane sugar. At least occasionally, the taste of good sweets is worth it putting on some extra fat for me. Yes, aspartame would be less fattening, but would you want steel instead of ash & mahogany on your T&C even though it weighs less? Didn’t think so….
Good on ya, Mr. 64. Off the topic of cars, but very much on the topic of the relationship of mass production and marketing to our culture and lifestyles.
JPC: I took it as a prediction; you’re a prophet!
Did I not say it was a four speed? Well, I guess I didn’t use those exact words. It’s a two speed (High and Low Range) with an underdrive that works on both ranges (2×2=4). It automatically starts in underdrive in whichever range it’s in. So normally, it’s starting off in “third” gear.
Update: I modified my wording to make it clear that there are four speeds. Who knows anymore what an underdrive is?
I do 🙂 But better wording now.
Just spellbinding. I want that radio hanging in my living room. Or, to live in that car.
“The result is a front end that looks about a foot too wide and long for the rest of the car.”
I always liked the exaggerated proportions from this era. Reminds me of “The Taxi that Hurried,” and classic Deco illustrations of trains and ships.
Back when people weren’t afraid of color even brown could be beautiful.
Love that brown. I love tobacco-brown (or in that neighborhood) anything, really.
Magnificent car. Practical? No. But magnificent.
I look at the Town and Country (and the entire 40-48 Chrysler line, for that matter) and I see Chrysler Corporation at its height. At this point in time they put out a pinnacle of product that I really don’t see anybody touching, and their holding second place behind GM was definitely well earned.
Hindsight being what it is, it’s interesting to read this fully cognizant that within three years everything was going to start falling apart for Chrysler. Starting in 1949, GM was going to take over completely and hold that position for the next 20+ years, both in styling, engineering and marketing.
Wow! A true life wooden Commuter Yacht on 4 wheels for the upscale folks of the mid 40’s! The color combination with the wood is just incredibly beautiful and then there is the interior. My God, how does this company go from this to the K car roughly 40 years later?
I simply am overwhelmed by the continual parade of beautiful cars Paul finds on the streets of his hometown. Amazing. And a tip of the cap and a hearty salute to Mr Romm!
Avon offered an aftershave in a T&C-styled decanter back in the mid-70’s. A relative who sold Avon showed me the brochure, which is how I first learned about the T&C line. To see one up close and take note of all that went into it for the money is breathtaking.
Learning what I’ve learned since then, it makes perfect sense for someone to offer a car like this. Chrysler understood the “exclusivity” factor and its importance to the wealthy. But that said, did they make money on the T&C’s?
Sweet ride! Me thinks it could use a little underhood detailing, however. From this to K in just 33 years…sad
And K car Town and Countrys with plastic wood on the outside. Now I understand the heritage and I’m more disgusted than when they actually did come out.
I’ve never seen a woodie as nice as this one, I do agree, but since it’s a weekly driver work in progress, the engine bay should be the final detail in the restoration.
“From this to K in just 33 years…sad”
Ronnie Schreiber summed this up nicely in his recent review of the modern 300 over at TTAC: “The K-car saved Chrysler the company. The K-car almost destroyed Chrysler the brand.”
One of these things is not like the others:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-1946-chrysler-town-and-country-sedan-a-slave-to-fashion-and-varnish/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-1973-imperial-lebaron-by-chrysler/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/uncategorized/curbside-classic-1985-chrysler-new-yorker-reinkarnation/
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2012/08/review-2012-chrysler-300-luxury-series/
Absolutely gorgeous! A elderly neighbor of mine in Alexandria, VA drove a navy blue Saratoga of this vintage in ’80’s traffic very occasionally. I love Postwar Chryslers you can wear your hat in!
Gives new meaning to the term “Land Yacht”!
What a gem! Thank you for the great write up Paul. And if you see Dick again, tell him we all hope he has many wonderful years with his T & C.
You can tell him yourself; he’s been perusing CC since I told him about it. He’s probably reading this over breakfast right now.
An awesome find and a spellbinding narrative. Reminds you of a classic Chris Craft, complete with marine-grade hardware, love the Land Yacht comparison. I had the privilege some years back of seeing one of these sedans undergoing restoration, for a well known collector in the Sacramento area (a friend of a friend situation). I recall the finger joinery of the replaced ash framing having to be painstakingly hand painted, since the original had been lost to rot, and it was apparently impossible to recreate. This T&C is a true work of art, I hope it finds a final home in a museum some day.
You nailed it. It is a dead ringer for a classic wood-bodied yacht. Just look at the hinges! Could have had some common market with the water-yachts too.
Long-time Oregonians like Mr. Romm, especially in and around Eugene, do have a deep relationship with wood.
This magnificent creation is a pinnacle, the culmination of the age of wood and steel. And the men who worked them. These wood-lined Chryslers must have been built by lifetime automotive woodworkers, paid on the same scale as anyone else in the factory. They came from a time when car body structures were mainly made of wood. Thus the Town & Country price at the time. This car is a monument to their craft.
Kudos to Dick Romm! And to a fine piece of writing and photography, another certain Curbie nominee.
I second the Curbie nomination.
“These wood-lined Chryslers must have been built by lifetime automotive woodworkers, paid on the same scale as anyone else in the factory. They came from a time when car body structures were mainly made of wood.”
Does anyone else see the irony in the fact that Dodge pioneered the stamped steel autobody, which became the dominant design and ended the use of wood and traditional coachbuilding? Or that Chrysler themselves had been experimenting with technologically advanced unibody(ish) car construction ten years earlier with the Airflow?
+1 on the curbie nominee. Great find, beautiful photography and storytelling. Thanks Paul for the story and to Dick Romm preserving and improving this fascinating machine in the 40+ years he’s owned it.
P.S. – Is that an early CHMSL above the license plate, or is it simply an extra tail lamp / license plate light?
That is a good point about their steel and unit bodies. Chrysler made its reputation on advanced engineering. How classy then for Chrysler to have marked the end of the wooden body era with such a wonderful homage.
Chrysler products of that era had a single center brake light with a license plate light underneath it. Kind of an early CHMSL except that the rear lights on the fenders were just taillights (did not get brighter when you braked) and turn signals (if so equipped).
And I’m re-reading it for the 1st time in a few years, as I sit over lunch today! May 2017. Dick Romm
Amazing that a mainstream company ever built such a thing. More like a Hispano Suiza or some other wild creation. But I think the chrome detracts a bit from the wood.
In any case, it’s always inspiring to see a classic car kept on the road, but even more so with something so gloriously impractical as a woodie.
A shame that the time has passed for this kind of design. It wouldn’t work at all on modern aero cars, but maybe an artful wood bed could be offered on a top-line GMC Sierra. (I think the current Ford and GM trucks have the same problem as the Chrysler: too much chrome in front.) I bet it would find plenty of fans in Houston.
“But I think the chrome detracts a bit from the wood.”
That’s impossible! I love chrome…
That’s just sublime. By far my favorite car ever written up on CC. I want one.
That roof rack begs to have a classic wood and canvas canoe strapped to it!
A magnificent automobile. I can’t say I’d really want one, either as a driver or a trailer queen. To drive it would horrify me, everytime a pebble or something struck it, I’d pull over to inspect the possible damage. A nervous breakdown would be eminent, cause no matter how careful a person is, things happen.
But to the fortunate guy that can afford to properly refinish or replace entire panels, wood or metal, I give him my best.
Good point, Dave. I was thinking today, as I enjoyed a Dunkin’ iced coffee on a gorgeous little late summer drive in the Imp, that I couldn’t duplicate the experience in a true classic because I wouldn’t let myself bring any liquids inside!
Just a quick note to Dave from owner Dick Romm: Those wood panels were refinished (some replaced) in 1989, and I have not ‘serviced’ them since except to keep them clean and dry. I try not to drive the car in the rain, although I’ve been ‘caught’ several times, once seriously at the 2011 Concours in Forest Grove, OR, where I was 130 miles from home, and it rained virtually all day. One of the finger joints, as a result, could use a bit of sanding, but otherwise once I thoroughly dried things, everything seems all right. Keeping the car in the garage, of course, helps! The owner’s manual did say something to the effect of “treat this car like you would a fine yacht.”
Dick, I’m glad your car is hardier than I anticipated. Like you, I try to keep my vintage cars out of the rain. Although a car with minimal value, my 78 Eldo has gotten wet three times since I bought it in 2000. The original owner I bought the car from, said it only was caught in the rain once in the 22 years he owned it.
Anyhow, stuff still ages and nicks occur. We can only try our best to care for the items we cherish.
Enjoy!
Surely I’m not the first one to notice how deftly the author/photographer’s name was included in the opening photo. Nicely done!
Did you catch the blue 300C in the front end photo? 🙂
…not only that but the “I [heart] it” graffito on the wall behind the car!
…and he drives it to the post office?
Yes, and that’s what makes the whole thing even better!
We’ve all seen great classics in mint condition at classic car shows before. Seeing one on the streets is another experience altogether – a comforting one, because I think it feels reassuring to see something (car, music instrument, whatever) which is actually in use, doing what it was made for in the first place, instead of just being exhibited. That’s like seeing a real, living elephant walking around in its natural environment, as compared to looking at a stuffed one in a museum of natural history. I love museums of natural history, but it’s just two different things.
Of course, in 2012 it certainly takes guts to run errands in a 1946 T&C (NB. not many other drivers would deny me my right of way, possibly, but I’d still be a nervous wreck). But somehow it makes sense, too. Because you owe it to the car. You acknowledge that it’s not only a sculpture on wheels. In short, there is something deeply honest about the whole thing. I wish there were more people like Mr Romm.
Come to think of it, living in Europe I have never seen a 1946 T&C, be it on the streets or at a classic car show. So as far as I’m concerned, this one really has to be CC of the year. In any case it will be a very hard act to follow. Thanks Paul!
I’m trying to imagine what the combination of the flathead six, fluid drive, and that vacuum tube radio must sound like. I bet that car sounds as good as it looks.
The flathead is indeed a pleasant sound – it really does sound like an old speedboat (many of which were powered with essentially the same engine). I once drove a 51 Dodge Meadowbrook with a slightly smaller version of this engine and the basic Fluid Drive – It had the personality of an old southern gentleman smoking a pipe in a rocking chair. Comforting but certainly not in a hurry to do anything. The only problem with those old tube AM radios is that nobody is broadcasting any music (let alone music appropriate for this car) on the AM band these days.
Bring your own music along with a little portable AM transmitter. Put it out of sight in the glove compartment with a little pod player and it’s 1946 all over again.
Now, that’s a good idea. I think I’m gonna get one of those kits. I get tired of having nothing to listen to on my old Crosley radio, which by the way kind of looks like an old Chrysler…
Attempting to post a pic…
Nice. The grille and knobs look like an old radiator and headlamps, logo, script and all.
Every summer, I spend a week with my family on Lake Wesserunsett in Madison, Maine. There is a guy who owns a camp on the lake who has a vintage wooden Chris Craft that you usually hear before you see, and my hearing isn’t very good. The gurgle of that old flat head is just awesome. Part of the thrill of that boat is hearing it first, knowing that it is unique and then seeing it which just confirms that, yes this is a very special boat………. And you should see his boathouse!
A beautiful car, and how grand to see it on the streets!
In my WPC Club days I was acquainted with two different 1946-48 Town & Country convertibles. They were both medium metallic green, and while one of them did have a green interior, the other had Highlander plaid seats and door panels in a maroon interior. The owner of one of them had restored the wood himself, and he told me that the tolerances on the finger joints between adjacent wood pieces were in the thousandths-of-an-inch range. It makes plain old metal work seem like a breeze by comparison.
I suspect that the main reason for the paucity of 8-cylinder Mopar cars was that the V8 engine hadn’t made its appearance yet, and the long straight 8 engine needed a longer wheelbase, with all the adjustments that required, such as different hoods, front fenders etc. Yet Studebaker and Pontiac, to name just a couple of manufacturers, didn’t seem to have a problem with that.
There were about 100 or 125 8 cylinder Town & Country sedans produced. You’re right; they had a longer hood for the longer engine, and an increased wheelbase. All of the T&C convertibles had 8 cylinder engines; don’t know the rationale for the limited number of 8 cylinder sedans.
This car really speaks to me. I’ve been a fan of Chrysler for ages. I’ve probably owned more ChryCo vehicles than any other make, and there always has been something about their styling that appealed to me — even the ’62s that made so many around here cringe. They pulled everyone else into the ’60s with their forward look. The ’61 Dodges, with rounded fins, were among my favorite models. They went square in the mid-’60s when the others were rounding off. They lost their way in the ’70s when they opted to follow instead of go their own way. This T&C seems to capture everything beautiful and impractical that I love about Chrysler because it expressed somebody’s persona so beautifully. These cars make real statements with their equisite forms.
Bravo.
So true. Like it or not, the modern Chrysler 300 seen in the (incredible) front view photo carries on that boldness of style. It still works well for Chrysler when they get it right.
I can’t think of a single thing to add to this thread…this is just a stunning automobile!
If ever there was a Curbside Classic, this was it!!!
Fantastic! Thanks Paul for sharing the story and especially Dick for making it possible with your care for the car over so many years – I wish you many more happy miles!
Paul:
What a fantastic automobile! What a fantastic article, you really outdid yourself on this
one. I’ve always been a fan of woody wagons, I would love to see a manufacturer bring
one back with good quality synthetic wood material. I’m trying to visualize what my Honda
Odyssey would look like as a woody…
I too am feeling the love, as for those of you who made “Land Yacht” comments I’m grooving on that too. I can just see myself saying to my wife now…
“Well you see, Angel, this IS my yacht.”
A very befitting article on an awesome find Paul. This is one of my all-time favourite CC pieces, thank you! 🙂
An amazing, beautiful find. I can’t really add anything else…
I saw this article on Hemmings blog. One guy menaged to make the Town & Country roadster who should had been. http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2012/10/17/one-of-none-chrysler-town-and-country-roadster-heads-to-auction/
Hi everyone,
Our club has many owners of these T&C woodie cars.
Anyone can join our club and the National Woodie Club.
Simply go to our website:
http://www.townandcountrywoodies.com
Ownership of a car is NOT necassary…..
Click on Membership in the website.
Happy New Year to all,
Harold
Hi Harold, my name is Chris and my uncle died and left me his 46 Chrysler town and country convertible with a continental kit. The car is fully restored. Wondering how much I should sell it, and if you know somebody who would love to have it? I can get pictures of it.
Only just found this blog piece……..
Fascinating car and history, and absolutely wonderful.
Do you a parallel in the origins of the T&C with the origins of the Range Rover and Grand Cherokee/Waggoneer?
Me too, can’t believe it took me this long to find this great piece.
Have a lot of love for this era of Chryslers, and the T&Cs. My grandfather had a blue ’48 Windsor sedan with the Highlander plaid interior; I’ve seen it in old Kodacolor movies. And folks in town had a really rare blackout ’42, formerly owned by an industrial filmmaker in Cleveland.
The bustle back rear end of the normal sedans was an interesting mid point between Ford and Mercury’s sheer backs and GM’s torpedoes. And as noted above, the fit and finish of the detail parts is fantastic. As is that color!
Awesome find! This, IMHO, is *the* Town and Country. I love the grille of the 1946 Chrysler.
Glad to hear that Mr. Romm and his gorgeous T&C are still enjoying nice days together! What a fantastic car…the color, the craftsmanship, the art deco influences. The grillework of the ’46 is amazing in its excesses of width and chrome. And that radio panel! Be still my heart. A finer-looking piece of metalwork would be a rare thing indeed.
Just breathtaking.
Doggonnit Paul, I have lots of work to do today, but when this piece came up again, I could do nothing but luxuriate my through it for a second time.
I really like that “slopeback” model, it makes me want to run out, get a near new hatchback, and line the sides with Di-Noc or a similar looking wrap material.
Chrysler has great cars in it’s portfolio, too bad it’s newer cars are “hit or miss”.
So glad you chose to run this piece again; I’ve not seen it ’til now.
Very informative write-up, and a truly beautiful, beautiful car to feature.
Thanks for the education and eye-candy.
I get wood looking at this wonderful old Chrysler .
-Nate
The scarcity of sheet metal supplies in those immediate postwar years played into the motivation to build the Town and Country as well as those from Ford. The extensive handwork involved made these six cylinder Windsor-based T & C sedans priced comparable to a Cadillac 62 sedan. They were very much prestige cars, above most of the wooden-bodied station wagons except the Buick Super and Roadmaster Estate Wagons.
Finger-jointed bent wood on the trunk – I am in love! As a woodworker I certainly do appreciate all the craftsmanship that went into building this car originally, and even more so to restore it. Just gorgeous!
I saw a Town and Country convertible of the same vintage at a car show several years ago. A wonderful car, but this sedan tops it. The combination of wood and chrome with the Palace Brick Brown paint is classic, and I can just imagine the aroma of leather and varnish from the interior. What a beauty. I can’t picture driving this car and NOT smiling.
That is some car both inside and outside. I can hardly pound a nail into a piece of wood so I’m very impressed with the craft,a ship that went into wood bodied cars. The featured Chrysler is something else and the feature is well written and sprinkled with interesting images. Once again I gain new automotive knowledge.
These cars define “glitzy”, but I they must be the equivalent of taking care of a wooden motorboat with all that wood to sand and varnish every year. Definitely NOT low maintainence.
What a great article about a very unique and wonderful car and owner.
Fun reading this article again 5 years later in 2017. I still have the car, and it is presently getting its now-wobbly front suspension rebuilt with stock parts. We’ll be driving it to the WPC National Meet in Tacoma, this summer, about 250 miles away, hoping the weather will stay dry!
Dick, I’m sure the sun gods will smile on you. 🙂 I always smile when I see you on the street, which I have several times now.
When is the meet? And one of these days, I’d love to beg a ride from you.
“And he tries to drive it at least every two weeks, except in the rain, of course.”
Did Chrysler put a varnish coat or other material over the wood to stop any swelling or other effects of rain or moisture?
Yes; varnish. As in the title of the article. But that requires regular re-doing.
Pretty ironic that this car came from the era when Chrysler went out of their way to be as starchy and conservative as possible.
You had me at Orthodontia. Very cool if not way over the top. Dick is to be congratulated on this specimen.
That engine compartment looks rather compact from the inside view, although it appears to be massive from the outside.
I would think that he would have regular offers to borrow the car for movie shoots. Possibly minus the roof rack however, unless the movie is being shot in Beverly Hills.
A little detail jumped out at me on this reading. The five knobs underneath the radio, with their functions labeled on the knobs themselves, make me think of organ stop drawknobs, each labeled with the name of the stop.
Stop knobs at either side of image.
I suspect the group in the first brochure photo would have wished there was a wagon model. As roomy as that sedan is, I think that the four hunters plus the lady plus the three hunting dogs would be rather a tight squeeze.
What a gorgeous car. There’s something about woodies, that while thoroughly impractical, they are just oh so cool and nice to look at.
I briefly, but not that briefly, gave some thought to putting on some 3M wood grain (Di Noc?) that I’d inherited from a cousin when he passed, on a BMW E28 I’d grown tired of back around 2010. He did auto wood restoration and used the vinyl on some dashes. I wanted to use it to make the first BMW Woodie that I would have ever seen. Unfortunately pragmatism prevailed and I just sold the car, at the absolute bottom of the market, but that’s another story. The sample I put on the recycling can for testing is a bit faded, but not terribly so 13 years later on top in the full sun. Pretty good stuff.
Truly a ughly automobile, but with stem to stern stunningly beautiful details and amazing craftsmanship!
My dad had a distant, very distant, relative: a ’52 De Soto Firedome (?) monster 4 door with (IIRC) a 125 hp Hemi and pot metal chrome parts that turned into the craters of the moon when we lived out in New Jersey for 3 long years!
This certainly is a very interesting article and beautiful photo spread-THANKS! 🙂 DFO
This is far and away my favorite CC ever.
A Curbside Classic classic. I saw his 2017 comment, now at almost ten years on, it would be interesting to know if Dick still owns his T&C.
Yes, I still own the T&C; through my own fault I drove it without checking the coolant, (my temp gauge had failed several years ago, and 5 miles from home it overheated. I nursed it 8 miles home (BIG mistake) on just several cylinders, since it was Sunday and I had left mu cell phone home. Loong story short, the engine had to be rebuilt, but it looks and runs beautifully. That little episode allowed me to restore all the underwood paint and repaint accessories, etc. So the car is better than ever now. I’m getting older though and am considering at least sometime in the future finding a new home for it with someone who will take care and appreciate it! Dick Romm. January 2023.
Dick, Nice to hear from you. Stephanie and I saw you on the road not long ago; probably this past summer. It was great seeing you both!
Viewing this automobile as a car design……….uhh? However, looking at it as eye-popping EYE CANDY….it is simply a magnificent work of rolling art that exhibits craftsmanship one “WOOD” never see today!
Truly a stunning vehicle!!! :):):) DFO
Thanks Dennis; That posting is fairly old, but you’ll be happy to know that I drove the car twice in the past few weeks….still running and looking strong! Dick Romm