(first posted 3/7/2011) Childhood imaginations run rampant, especially when it comes to what’s under the hood of a car. I used to convince myself that our ’65 Coronet 440 really did pack a 440. And I endlessly fantasized about engine swaps; that precursor to another type of swapping fantasy.
Our first car, an elderly 1954 Ford, was the original canvas upon which to project my mental machine-ations, despite it sporting the first OHV V8 in the low price field. But the ’54 239 CID version of the new Y-block had a very modest 130 hp, so I quickly set myself to various engine implant schemes to perk up its sluggish acceleration. The “Thunderbird” 312 was an obvious starting point. Maybe even the new-for 1961 390, which came in a wild NASCAR-friendly 401 hp version. Or a big 430 from a Lincoln, for its mammoth torque. And by 1961, plenty of Chevy small-blocks were finding themselves under all kinds of hoods, especially Fords. Or…or…well, even my fertile imaginations on the endless possibilities never came up with this combination…
(looks just like Iowa in 1960)
In case it wasn’t obvious yet, I’ve been trying to find the cars that correlate to the various chapters of the Auto-Biography as it gets replayed. So far, so good, but sometimes one has to accept minor fudges. We actually had a 1954 Ford, which looks close enough to this 1953. But there was a big difference in terms of what was under the hood: in 1954, Ford had the first OHV V8 in the low-price field, and ours proudly proclaimed that it had one by the new V8 emblem on its front fender. Ironically, although the 1953 Fords celebrated the company’s fiftieth birthday with commemorative horn buttons, there was little cause for celebration about what was under the hood.
In fact was the last year for the flat head V8, that first saw the light of day in the legendary Deuce 1932 Fords. Despite its vaunted history and drag racing exploits, it suffered intrinsic shortcomings from its shaky beginnings. The side-valve inherently is not an very efficient design, although legions of in-line flathead fours, sixes and eights gave satisfactory service for most of the first half of the twentieth century. But the V design makes for a thorny problem: how to route the hot exhaust ports, because they’re down in the cylinder block, not up overhead like in an OHV head.
Cadillac, which largely pioneered the side-valve V8 engine (above, in a Ford hot rod, no less), took a prudent course by routing the exhaust (gray manifold) out directly into the middle of the vee. Of course, that creates a bit of a plumbing challenge co-mingling with the intake manifold.
But to simplify things, and keep the hot exhaust away from the carburetor, Henry chose to have the exhaust ports on the opposite side of the block where the valves are. So the exhaust port for the two middle cylinders pass right between them, to bring them out on the low side of the vee (those two ports are siamesed, which is why Ford flatheads (above) only have three exhausts per side. Passing that hot exhaust right through the block had the nasty effect of heating the water in the cooling system more than it could readily dissipate, and thus the tendency of of the Ford to overheat. It was thermodynamically challenged.
This article wasn’t meant to denigrate the Ford flathead V8, which had a glorious career despite its intrinsic limitations. But that may have been in part due to how common and cheap old Fords were; after twenty-one years in production it was hard not to stumble over flathead blocks littering side yards. Its hot rodding success was because of all the collective effort that went into it the aftermarket and modifications, not exactly Henry’s genius.
By the time I arrived in 1960, the flathead Ford was already old hat. The 1949 Cadillac and Olds OHV engines started the revolution, and early adopters (with the bucks) started stuffing Caddys into Fords and slick Studebakers right away. And when the Chevy V8 arrived in 1955, the Ford was handed its death warrant.
So there I was scouring the ‘hoods for a ’54, and it’s not like they’re littering the streets of Eugene, despite its reputation. When I spotted the distinctive plump rear end (and a very nice one it is; one of my all-time favorites actually. In fact I have a framed hand-colored photo of a ’53 Ford butt on my wall, which I bought years ago. But it has Overdrive…) Now where was I? Nice butts do tend to be distracting. Yes; when I saw it in the back yard parking lot behind this house, my heart jumped a bit. Could it be a ’54?
Fortunately, Robert, its owner is retired and was at home, and was quite happy to show it to me and bring it ’round front. But the minute he fired it up, I was a bit flummoxed. This was not the very distinctive and slightly lopey burble of a flathead V8, nor… Let’s build the tension a bit more while we do some 1953 Ford history. We mustn’t be accused of shortchanging the facts, eh?
The ’53 was the middle year of the ’52-’54 cycle of this body. But as far as I know, its underpinnings were probably still loosely based on the all-new 1949 Ford, the first modern (except engine) car since quite a while to come out of Dearborn. The ’49 was a critical car to put Ford back in the running, and after a few teething problems, the new Ford generation was doing the trick.
The new body for the ’52 helped propel Ford past Chrysler for second place (think of that; Chrysler as #2). Buoyed by its momentum, and perhaps to celebrate the company’s fiftieth birthday, Ford did something in 1953 that forever changed the US auto market: it invented channel stuffing. Ford decided to take on Chevy for the #1 brand position, and just cranked up the production and dumped them on dealer’s lots, with big discounts.
This unleashed the famous Ford Blitz, which Chevy of course countered. No serious sweat off GM’s back. But it was the death knell for the independents: Studebaker, Nash, Hudson, and Willys were all struggling with profitability anyway, and the last thing they needed was an all-out price war. The post-war seller’s market was officially over, and the independents’ future was sealed.
The Ford brand sold 1.2 million of these cars, and did take the #1 sales crown in ’53, at least by model year accounting. So Ford got its golden anniversary present, and that horn plaque was not made in vain. Chevy beat back Ford for the next few years, but buyers’ addiction to discounts was the price paid. Speaking of price, this mid-level Customline stickered at $1628, about $13k in 2010 dollars, before the discounts.
So the 1953 Ford was both the beginning of Ford’s second half century and the end of the flathead. Its 239 cubic inches (3.9 L) packed all of 110 gross hp; maybe about 90-95 in today’s net hp. Chevy’s venerable but OHV six made 115 that year. So Ford’s reputation as a quick car was mostly gone, having been established in the mid-thirties when Fords weighed several hundred pounds less than the competition. That was thanks to Henry’s unwavering determination to use the highest quality steels, and keep things simple.
In fact, Ford’s own new 215 CID OHV six that arrived in 1952 was probably a better choice for most folks, thanks to its better torque curve and more efficient design. Its 101 hp rating was probably kept a bit low to keep some distance from the more expensive eight, but there were drivers who swore the six was quicker in most applications.
In fact, Ford originally planned to only use the OHV six in the new ’52 Fords, but a last-ditch effort by product manager Chase Morsey to convince the Ford Board otherwise was successful, and the flathead was given a reprieve for two more years until the new Y-Block was ready.
When Robert, whose sparkling eyes, slight but wiry build and other feature gave him an impish quality, fired up the Ford and blipped it repeatedly to warm it up a bit, it reminded me of vintage sports car-racers of yore. The Maserati and Jaguar come to mind: a biggish six, packing a long stroke, but with a distinct bite from the obviously genuine split dual exhaust system. That really changes the sound of a six, from a silky purr to a mean snarl.
So I ponder: could this have the world’s only majorly hopped-up original Ford six in it? Chevy and GMC sixes were very common hot-rodding fodder in the way old days, with all kinds of aftermarket parts available. Although I suspect someone might have taken one on, I’ve just never heard about this generation Ford six having been hopped up much. Probably because it arrived in the OHV V8 era, so why bother?
After a a few warm up scales, I heard the distinct drop of engine speed that correlated to being dropped into gear on an automatic. Hmm. The Fordomatic was a dog; essentially a two-speed unless you manually dropped it into Low. The Ford blubbered its way out the driveway and parked out front. Enough already; open that damn hood!
Robert’s twinkling eyes and smile were in overdrive as he lifted up the hood of this otherwise very original and unassuming old beater of a Ford.
Holy Mopar! A slant six, and not just any old slant six. This one’s been very nicely warmed up with a Clifford intake sporting a Carter 650 carb with a nicely crafted cold air intake system, a cam whose provenance is now forgotten (to me), and Robert’s own handmade headers running into the dual pipes. And of course, there’s a Torqueflite to back it up.
This is Robert’s everyday driver. Recently, he drove it to Las Vegas, where he crashed a major Mopar slant-six gathering. Well, he asked first, and told them that his car was Mopar powered. And to rub salt in the wounds, he shut down the genuine Mopar six Darts and Valiants in the drag racing event, with a respectable 15.3 @ 85 mph. Well, Robert loves him some slant six, and he’s got an even wilder one in a…stay tuned.
Related reading:
Book Review: The Man Who Saved The V8
CC: 1953 Ford Crestline Victoria – The End of the Long Road for the Flathead V8
Wow, I didn’t see that one coming! Mo-power to him… 😉
Boy, me neither. I did suspect it’d be an ohv six, because the 53 V8’s had V8 emblems just above the front wheel cutouts. As soon as I saw the instrument panel I knew something was up….
A neighbor had a 53 6 2-door sedan (not a club coupe) with overdrive. He broke first gear, and kept on driving it, just starting out in second, until the clutch got so worn that there wasn’t enough clutch left to push-start it. Bad Larry! I learned to drive in snow in Iowa and Illinois in a very similar car when I went to college in Des Moines.
I liked this body style, but liked the 1953 Mercs even better.
I had a Ford very similar to this one in the late fifties. Was a solid, reliable car. Never had problems with overheating. Finally took a dirt nap after the misses sideswiped a tree driving home in an ice storm and it wasn’t worth fixing. Sold the engine to some teenager and the body to the West Side scrap yard.
I suspected Mopar power when I saw the gas pedal in the first interior shot, but I never expected the slant six…
When the title of the article was “You’ll never guess….” I figured it was NOT a smallblock Chevy so probably something Mopar. The old Mopar flathead-6 that soldiered-on through the 1950s would not have been a good choice. I was figuring on finding a 50’s Hemi like the 331 underhood. Finding a /6 tucked in there was a pleasant surprise indeed.
Ha, I was on your wavelength but MY thinking was the contemporary Hudson straight six, hopped up with Twin-H power and all the associated goodies. I noticed the floating throttle pedal, didn’t associate it with Mopar though. Good engine choice. I understand a 225 with ITS goodies can make some serious goodness…but who expects to see a Mopar engine in a Ford?
My dad bought a ’53 Customline Mileage Maker 6 Fordor new. It was Timberline Green [dark]. With optional Fordomatic, the premium pushbutton AM radio and heater [“guitar and stove”] and tinted glass it stickered for $2,400.00. Room for 6 adults. 20 mpg highway. 0-60 in, oh, maybe 15 secs? I learned to drive on that car. The engine never died, but the transmission did, at about 90K. He junked it. Then, in ’62, I bought a ’54 Tudor Y-Block V8 with Overdrive. $300, the going price for a beater then. I learned to drive a stick driving it home that afternoon. Dozens of stoplight drag races later, the transmission and the engine blew up; I took the plates off and hitched home. Very few of that ’52 through ’56 body style still around…..
It’s fun to see guys making it up on the fly. Especially since it is used as a daily driver and an interstate GT. I dig the cold air system too…
+1. Quiet guys like Robert who come up with unassuming, off-the-wall stuff are the heart and soul of hot-rodding. It’s great that he took it to a Mopar show.
Give me a 4bbl, slant-six powered ’53 Ford four-door with faded paint and bare steelies over spotless, restored chrome, anytime.
The placement of the tach in that tidy gauge cluster says all that needs said about the owner.
The man has his priorities straight!
I remember the ’54’s having a clear glass?plastic domed lens behind the instrument cluster and light came in from the windshield. The turn signal indicators were on either side in a little round, almost miniature version of the tail lights if I remember right, like 9 o’ clock and 3 o’ clock. ? Another one of the classic rides of my childhood, my Uncle and Aunt had a dark green one, a 4 dr. with the 223 OHV 6 and 3 spd. For a time I used to dream of fixing up their old Ford or the ’50 Chevy 2 dr My Dad and Mom had. They both used to sit in a field out back of our house as they were retired for newer cars in better mechanical condition. The ’50 Chevy had a slipping clutch and possibly a cracked head, not sure why my Uncle parked his Ford ?
So what was the hot engine in, a Corvette?
A slant six ‘vette; now that would be something! Actually, its a ’64 or so Dart with 6 Mikuni side-drafts.
Hi
We have a 53 Ford and are painting the engine. we have read everywhere the color is Chyrsler/Ford red but it does not look as deep of red as your picture. Is the color on this car the original engine color?
I was sure it was gonna be a Fordillac, a super-rare fordor, especially after the picture of the cad mill.
A hot slant six is even cooler !
I had some 53-54 fords and some slantsixes, but I never thought of a combo.
how much for one??? I have one but I need sell it, this is not full original
I’d have put some well tuned SU carbs on this Slanty. 6 does equal 8 as Clifford says.
So is this good looking FoMoCo still around Paul? the Carburetor missing its top is interesting. That accelerator pedal looks just like the one in my family’s two previous vehicles, a 70 Dart, a 95 Voyager, and our current vehicle an 03 Caravan.
Probably. I haven’t been in that part of town for a while. The carb isn’t missing its top; the air cleaner has been taken off and moved over a bit so that the carb is fully visible.
Ahhh, well that shows how much I know.
No worries Teddy ;
I learn almost as much here as I ever did in my various Technical Schooling .
Just ask questions and pay attention , the Good Folks here are ready to share their combined knowledge because after all : knowledge is useless if it’s not shared , right ? .
-Nate
Absolutely Nate and when I buy my next Carbureted vehicle not only will it not be as worn out as my first, but I will also care a lot more about it.
What a terrific sleeper ! .
I too was thinking : why not run one side draft carby per intake port ? you have to experience a set up like that on an i6 to believe how much additional power it gives and if properly done , there’s no trade off in daily driveability nor fuel economy .
The home made headers appear to be equal length too , one more bit of evidence the owner really was an Old School Hot Rodder who knew his stuff .
This car reminds me of Bobby ODell , an Oakie living in Fontanna , Ca. who had hundreds of old cars in his huge dirt lot , anyone who lived near there through the 1980’s until he died a few years ago , knew of him or had heard of his stash , nothing was for sale until close to his death .
Anyways , he mustered out of the Army in 1954 , took his muster pay and bought the cheapest new Ford two door sedan , 223 i6 of course , then got married , took his bride to new York City , not in the spiffy new Ford , no , in the best of his three 1937 Buick Century four door sedans ~ the one with the chromed out engine and multiple carbys ~ his new bride was -not- amused although they crossed Nevada @ 100 + MPH ,as it was legal then . he had much fun , she departed shortly thereafter .
He stopped driving that Ford when it still had low miles because he liked his oldies better .
-Nate
Excellent combination of two greats: 50s Ford and hi-po slant six. Also, captures “the look” of a well-used original. (i.e., what patina used to mean before it was applied to beat up rusty junk).
PS Also hear you about the trunk lid noting Overdrive. I regularly admired one in a driveway on my rounds as a kid (black, with the obligatory dual exhaust). A rare sight in Maine, due to rust issues equaled only by Toyota trucks.
I’m for Slant Sixes in any car they will fit. And this Ford is a top notch “derelict”. Love the combo logo, too.
New names for the trunk lid:
Fordflite
Slant ‘n’ Uncle
Dearborn Dart
Highland Park Lane
Hyperpaktive
I’m not sure how I feel about this. If you’re going to put all the work in to a weird engine swap, why a Slant Six? Even most Chrysler guys upgrade to an LA small block.
***I own a car with a Slant Six, so I feel I’m free to judge***
If you must go Chrysler, even a lowly 318 with similar exhaust work and carburetion will leave this thing in the dust. IMO, a Buick Nailhead would be the engine to swap. A 401 in a ’53 Ford would not only look awesome, but turn some pretty stout times.
Oh well, a guy’s got to follow his muse if he wants to live a satisfying life, so more power to him!
Aha! I knew this car looked familiar. This guy is, I believe, on a website called slantsix.org.
It’s not a super active site, but those guys sure know their slants.
My main concern with mine is to keep it running well, so I don’t frequent the site often…it took a bit to make the connection.
We had a 53 Mainline 2 door, flathead V8, radio, and heater. Baby blue. First new car my father got after WWII. It had major overheating problems but it did get to 100,000 miles which we thought was a major accomplishment for a 53. I only learned here what the overheating was all about and now I understand why it could not be fixed. Not sure my parents wanted it fixed anyway as it limited my teenage driving!
Though i am a person that strives for originality with classic cars I like seeing a slant six under this cars hood.
Now if he hasn’t done it already, he needs to attend every Ford show that he can.
The flathead V8 soldiered on until 55 here something to do with Canadian sourced CKD packs Ive never seen a Ford 6 from this era it wasnt worth putting on the menu all US Fords had the bigger Mercury engine post war here. Nice conversion this though I’d probably go for a Hemi 6 from a post 70 Valiant or just a 4.1 Falcon 6 as they are far more plentiful but thats unique local conditions.
With a tip of the hat to Tolkien, I’d call it the Mordor (Mopar engine plus it’s a Fordor). Just the thing for tearing up the roads of the Shire.
I am more of a big engine in a small car than a little engine in a big car. There are, however, a lot of aftermarket upgrades for the leaning tower of power and the blocks are indestructable.
Thought you were leading into a straight six Ford. Dad had a 52 or 53 with an ohv ford six and I never thought it was original because it wasn’t a flathead. I always thought the ford six was ever bit as good as a v8, even the flatheads. Owned a total of 3 53 Fords and one 53 Merc. Cannot say why but they were available and cheap. Liked them but they did not last like I wanted them to. Probably something to do with my driving. Bought the last one in 65 in Newfoundland. Didn’t overheat much there and had a good heater. When I bought my new 66 vw I never looked back.
I wanna hear it!!!
The first Ford OHV six was 215 c.i. It then went to 223 c.i. in ’54, I think. My family had a ’56 Mainline 2 door with the six and three on the tree. Several Chevy sixes were left behind by it.
Pretty neat! A Pontiac OHC 6 would have been interesting also, had the owner chosen to go that route.
We had a 53 when I was a kid. It was bought in 55 and traded for the folks 1st new car. A 56 Ford Fairlane they bought in Jan of 57.
I’ve always been something of a “keep it in the family” engine-swap purist, but this is totally sweet – especially when taken in with it’s Dart GT companion. Great looking car, too – very nicely patinated(?) and a body style that I’ve hardly ever seen. Sweet “Fordomatic” emblem on the trunk; the placement and fairly restrained detailing even give off a little bit of a European look.
I’d also love to see the same type of setup with the Ford six or even the flathead. Cars that kind of straddle two eras like that always appeal to me for some strange reason – this Ford with the V8, the ’54 Pontiac or the last Twin-H “Hashes” have styling that clearly suggests OHV V8 power, but they’ve got ancient iron under the hood. That type of car done as a stealth hotrod (very much like this one) is really appealing to me.
Very, very nice. I love surprise combinations like this. I’ve heard of someone who put a 289 Studebaker in a Mustang. If that’s true, I’d love to see it!
A Mopar in a Ford… oh the blasphemy! This is worse than the noobs that are constantly stuffing all the Chev 350 engines into pre-war Fords because the 350 can be found all over the place and be bought dirt cheap since what they were in rusted away long ago. Ohhhh the blasphemy!
Which is the power of the engine and the maximum speed
My family in early 60’s had a hand me down 53 ford 4 door from my grand parents.
Had a six and standard shift. I don’t remember how many miles were on it when it gave up the ghost. I do recall my Dad doing a valve job on it with a dowel and rubber cup and some lapping compound.The car was a great second hand car.