(first posted 3/3/2014) An integral part of the traveling circus was the advance man. The show business equivalent of John the Baptist, his job was to spread the word about what was coming and to get everyone ready for the big show. The concept of the advance man pretty well sums up the 1956 Mercury.
From its beginning, Mercury had been a mildly spiffed-up Ford. But from 1949-51, Mercury became the beneficiary of a hasty revision to the FoMoCo product plan, and became a junior Lincoln. This, in combination with the beginnings of unprecedented postwar expansion, showed product planners a new direction for Mercury. Starting in 1957, Mercury would finally grow up to be a real medium priced car with its own unique body shell. And for 1958, Mercury would move even higher while an all-new car would be slotted between it and Ford.
But how to transition from the ’55-’56 Ford-based Mercurys to the real Oldsmobile and Buick fighter that was on the way? Through advertising, of course. Thus the Big M. C’mon now, who can forget The Big M? What grand, glorious mid-century American Hype. Make no mistake, Ford advertised the absolute snot out of the 1956 Mercury for one reason: to get us ready for the genuinely big Mercury that was on the way but not here just yet.
Take a look at these fabulous ads. Do you need to go whooshing over mountains? Do you need to hurtle around a speedway? Or just impress the heck out of the neighbors? Then the ’56 Mercury–scratch that–the ’56 Big M was for you!
I first came across some of these ads in old magazines as a kid. Although the cars were mostly extinct by the time of my adolescence in the early 70s, I never forgot the Big M. It wasn’t until I was a little older that I realized that I had been had. Nobody called these Big Ms. Nobody ever drove home and had a neighbor say “Lookie there–Herb just bought a Big M.” But by then, it didn’t matter. The ad campaign did its job and made at least some people (and a lot of kids) think that the 1956 Mercury was a lot bigger than it really was.
Is there anything really memorable about the 56 Mercury aside from the ad campaign? What was the actual ’56 Mercury? Easy–it was a ’56 Ford with an extra three and a half inches of wheelbase and a standard 312 V8 instead of Ford’s 292. The ’56 Ford was a fairly conservative and ordinary car, and the ’56 Mercury was not much different. It was not as long as other mid-priced cars (its wheelbase was a whopping seven inches shorter than the DeSoto), nor was it the most powerful car in its class. So while the competition promoted the cars it had, Mercury sold what it was going to become. Of course, you go to market with the car you’ve got, not the car you wish you had (or something like that).
As Big Ms go, this was what we would now call “entry level”. The Custom and the Monterey were a bit more upmarket, and serious neighbor-impressing called for the Montclair. But today’s CC is the low-end Medalist, which is kind of a mystery to me. After all, if the whole Big M concept was to sell size and power and style in a car that lacked at least 2 out of 3, then why create the new budget Medalist line for the first time in 1956? The gap between a Ford Fairlane and the next-model-up Mercury Custom (the former value leader) was only $215. Was it really necessary (or even a good idea) to plop a new, cheaper Mercury into a slot less than 5% above the cost of the Fairlane?
Even stranger, the Medalist would disappear forever after 1956. The following year, Mercurys would become more expensive cars. The Monterey would be the base model for 1957, and it would cost less than $100 short of the 56 Montclair, Mercury’s finest. So when trying to prepare the public for a bigger, more expensive Mercury that you know is coming next year, why on earth create the automotive equivalent of a blue light special in the clothing store that you are trying to promote as upscale? I guess we shouldn’t be surprised by Mercury’s split personality in 1956, because this kind of confusion dogged Mercury for its entire existence as it zigzagged between being a near-Ford and a near-Lincoln.
Muddled corporate focus or not, I was thrilled to find this car. My wife and I were leaving a restaurant one evening when I spied something red, white and old in a K-Mart parking lot across the street. I pulled in and saw no cars parked next to it in any direction, so I had no choice but to chalk it up to divine providence and whip out the phone camera. This car looks like it came right off the streets of Eugene, Oregon, not Indianapolis. Even a lightly used car will eventually rust here, but this one is in amazing condition for its age, despite having clearly seen its share of weather.
On its own merits, this is not a bad looking 1956 car. The ’55-’56 Ford had good bones, and the stylists were fairly successful in giving the car a more “important” look. I will confess that I have always had kind of a fascination with this model’s rear fender bulges and unique taillights. They are not attractive as much as they are intriguing and despite knowing there are three and a half extra inches of wheelbase in here somewhere, I am at a loss to tell exactly where.
I also wonder why the original owner would buy the cheapo Medalist and then pop for the two-tone paint (red and white no less) but still be fine with the dog dish hubcaps. Do you suppose that the original owner shelled out for the whitewalls too?
When I was maybe seven or eight, one of my mom’s cousins had one of these on his farm in Minnesota. It was a manual three speed, and his son (who was about my age) bragged to me that his dad “knew the gears by heart.” I was impressed. And I am likewise impressed that one of these is still in service and capable of burbling down to the local K-Mart so that its owner can pick up a few things. I wonder if he has any idea that he is driving the Big M?
“The gap between a Ford Fairlane and the next-model-up Mercury Custom (the former value leader) was only $215.”
I would compare the cost of this car against the Fairlane rather than the Custom. The M and Fairlane had almost identical sticker prices.(around $2450) So for Fairlane money you could have a Mercury…
I dusted off some old books (Illustrated History of Ford and Fifty Years of Lincoln Mercury, both published by Crestline Publishing in the early 70s) that gave pricing info. It looks like from the basic 56 Ford Mainline ($1,995) through the Mercury Montclair ($2,786), the next-higher model of 4 door sedan could be had for roughly another $100 in price. In 1955, there had been a $200 gap between the top Ford sedan and the bottom Mercury sedan. I can understand why they would want to fill that gap to make it easier to step up to the next level, but why do it with a new cheap Mercury instead of a higher-yet trim level Ford?
This is particularly strange to me since both Ford and Mercury would be moving up-market in 1957. The high-end Ford sedan (Fairlane 500) would be up by about $250 for 1957 compared to the 56 Fairlane, taking over the lower half of the territory that Mercury occupied in 1956. At the top end, the 57 Mercury Turnpike Cruiser would cost over $1000 more than Mercury’s highest priced 1956 4 door hardtop (the Montclair Phaeton). And the gap between the Fairlane 500 sedan and the base Merc was again back to about $200. So why the one-year-only budget Mercury for 56? I have no earthly idea.
I see what you mean. I found the pricing for the Fairlane line after a little digging. A Crown Vic Skyliner with a V8 was priced at $2301and that was the top of the heap for Fords except the Sunliner. I’d go with a Skyliner over a “base” model Merc any day.
If not for trying to woo Ford buyers the only other thing I could think of would be an attempt at snagging fleet sales or trying to get their money out of the tooling before the 57 models dropped.(Sometimes there was no logic at all to what the Big 3 did over the years too. That may well be the case here.)
This also got me to thinking about all the love for the “Tri Five” Chevies.. I never quite understood why the Chevy was so popular when, in my opinion, Ford and ChryCo had much better looking cars..
During this period, Ford was going through a complex internal political struggle over its mid-price divisions, which ultimately resulted in the Edsel. Among other things, they were getting hammered by GM’s B-O-P lines — B-O-P’s combined sales exceeded Mercury’s by close to three to one. Aside from just having more dealerships (something the addition of Edsel was originally supposed to help), one of the ways Buick, Olds, and Pontiac had managed that was broadening their reach. Pontiac went after Olds and Buick, while Buick went down nearly into Chevrolet territory with the Special. It was paying off for them, too — Buick went from fourth to third place in overall sales in MY1955, while Mercury was languishing down in seventh or eighth.
My guess is that this car was an attempt to do something similar. With shared bodies and running gear, the possibility of Ford cannibalizing Mercury wasn’t necessarily a bad thing; I would imagine a fair percentage of the price difference between the two was profit.
Why didn’t it continue? One of the weird side effects of the E-car project was the (ultimately hard to justify) decision to move Mercury upscale, closer to Lincoln. As I recall, Mercury management was not particularly happy about that, feeling (rightly, as it turned out) that it would drive away their existing customers, while failing to entice Olds and Buick customers. (The original rationale for adding a new division was to allow Mercury to sit just above Ford (competing for Pontiac and Dodge customers), with the E-car filling the gap between Mercury and Lincoln, which wasn’t how it turned out at all.) Deleting this model in ’57 may have been an attempt to start shifting Mercury away from the low-price end in preparation for ’58.
Always liked the Merc. With the exception of the last few years (when there was absolutely no difference between the Grand Marquis and the Crown Vic except the nameplate), there was always a positive attempt to differentiate it from the Ford. In most years the slightly longer wheelbases, larger standard engines and jazzier styling (the cool Breezeways for instance) all helped. Love the Z-Z top side spear on the ’55-’56’s. Then, the ’57-’60 models were even more different, with its own unique wheelbase and body. Sadly, nothing seemed to help.
I was always puzzled why GM could successfully sell three mid-priced cars while Ford had trouble selling one. Mercury consistently trailed B-O-P in sales no matter what they tried. Whether it tried to be a gussied up Ford or entry level Lincoln didn’t seem to matter. FMC basically gave up and the Merc plodded along until it finally lost all its identity and faded away.
Didnt see a way of contacting you out side of the posts, so just wanted to let you know that this is my car, its cool that you apriciate it. I dont know if the dual exhausts are original, but everything else is, has the original 312 y block, and runs great. Im hoping to restore it.
This is so cool. Your car has been one of my favorite finds!
Too bad that the K-Mart is one size too big. It would have been cool to see The Big M in front of a Big K.
As a kid, these cars were pretty much at the very bottom of my interest and awareness level. It was so painfully obvious what they really were: a Ford tarted up in very questionable taste.
At least the GM cars had different engines and other aspects to make them seem more unique and interest-worthy. Not the Mercs, at least not until the Breezeways came along.
Un fortunately for Ford all the world shared youre view Paul
In that sense, not much had changed about Mercury between the time you and I were kids.
Mercury was never on my radar, as a kid or adult. Maybe the ’67 Cougar was the only exception. Dad bought the most basic Pontiac in ’55 and it was something like only a $50 premium over the Chevy Belair, but that was ok. Pontiac was a different car underneath, even if it had the same basic Fisher body shell.
Looks just like a bigger version of my first car, a ’62 Vauxhall Envoy (Victor in other markets).
I say that tongue in cheek of course.
There is a pic (i tried use some html to post image, didn’t work) here on this site
http://users.av.eastlink.ca/~envoy/vauxhallenvoy.html
I found an original 59 Victor recently well worn but in good road worthy order
‘The Big M’ reminds me of the time Chrysler referred to the 1969 Plymouth GTX as ‘The Boss’. Unfortunately, Ford had just released their Boss 302 and Boss 429 Mustangs, so ‘The Boss’ GTX didn’t last very long.
I was always curious about the Medalist too. I’ve seen examples in one nondescript color with no radio, little hubcaps, and blackwall tires that looked just like Ford Mainlines. I never saw many that were two-tone at all, let alone with the color sweep like the one shown.
I’ve always liked ’55 and ’56 Mercs, having had three ’55’s; a Custom 2-door sedan with 3-speed in the white and yellow on green color combo that could be had on any 1955 American car (did the stylists get together and plan this?), a red and white Montclair 2-door hardtop with overdrive, and a red and black Monterey 2-door hardtop with Merc-o-matic.
Nobody’s going to go for the “BM” joke?
I’m just a little confused here. My recollection of the Ford and Merc body-lineage, was that the two got separate bodies in 1949. The planned-for new Ford, prior to the arrival of the Whiz Kids and Ernie Breech, was a disorganized, cost-overrun disaster. Breech, upon arrival, had designers start over on the Ford with set parameters; but later decided that the previous work could be used as a new Mercury.
And it was Mercury’s glory years…a body and car line with its own character. Which, as I understand it, remained (although trimmed and facelifted more and more to resemble the Ford full-size) until 1965, when the two lines reverted to sharing one body shell.
Is this wrong? The 1959-era Merc seems a definitely different vehicle than the Ford of that era. This one does resemble the ’56 Ford, but is it more a misguided attempt by the shared Styling Department to bring similarity to otherwise different vehicles?
You are right about the 49-51. I believe that the Mercury reverted to the Ford shell from 52-56, then got its own unique body shell(s) from 57-60. It is also my opinion (I am open to correction from others here) that the 57-58 Mercury body became a hand me down for the 59 Ford, while the 59-60 Mercury got a very heavy revamp if not a completely new body. From 1961 on, though, Mercury was back to being a Ford with a slightly longer wheelbase (except that the Breezeway models got a unique roof structure as well).
It’s interesting to read some of these historical accounts of what the car companies were doing in the 50’s and them never realizing they were repeating the same mistakes from the 20’s and 30’s. Plus, they repeated them until carmageddon. I think they will continue to repeat them into the future, too.
One thing I have to agree with Paul on: Did that car really come with dual exhausts in 1956? If you read marque-specific books or even magazines like Collectible Automobile magazine, you will inevitably come across what I call the dream-racer special.
It’s the car that was statistically possible, but highly not probable that more than two people would ever order. And that these cars would survive virtually untouched for 30-40-50-60 years…
I’m thinking of something like a 1967 Mercury Comet (not Caliente, just Comet 202 Model) with the optional “LeMans” twin four barrel 427 CID motor and 4 speed trans with optional 5.38 geared 9″ rear end. And somehow this car was left it in the corner of the shop or something, uncovered it 40 years later and it was still in pristine condition. Not like I haven’t actually seen this in the magazines or something…
At least with the subject car, you know it’s been driven once or twice…
When I was growing up in a small town in New Brunswick, Canada, some family friends drove down from Toronto (the unimaginably big city…) in a black, fully chromed, two door ’56 Mercury hardtop.
I remember thinking it was somehow impossible for a car like that to even exist in 1950’s New Brunswick. Local cars seemed to be mainly lumpy, stripped down, 2 door sedans, with a healthy coating of mud and dust. Even standing still, the profile of the seemingly always shiny Mercury made it look like it was about to leap out of the driveway.
There is a black and white picture somewhere of their entire family (2 parents, 4 kids) lined up, some proudly, some non-chalantly, against the side of their big black cat. A great 1950’s trophy car shot.
Hey this is my car, I double checked the plates but i had no doubt it was mine. Here is my son cleaning top. lol
Always neat to hear from the actual owner of a vehicle that someone on CC has “found” in the wild. 🙂 Congrats on keeping your Mercury going. The simple fact that it is still plying the streets at almost 60 years old makes it special.
“You cannot treat cars like humans. Cars need love.” Walter Röhrl
My dad was an LM dealer from 1947 until 1970 and lived with the identity struggle of Mercury against Ford, which was very real. He got stuck with Edsel in 1959/60 and that only added to the confusion. Sort of ironic, but Mercury’s main competitor was usually Ford. Lincoln was supposed to compete against Cadillac, but trailed so far behind in sales, it didn’t matter. Actually, some customers didn’t like the Caddie fins and preferred the tamer Lincolns. But, we’re talking about Big M’s which my father was sometimes called by competing dealers. It was in good fun and he took it in stride.
Regarding the deluxe color scheme on the bottom line Medalist, it was probably a result of the dealer ordering that car for his lot and picking a color in an attempt to jazz the car up for sale. I used to help fill out paper order forms that were then mailed to FoMoCo to have a car built. “Hey dad, what color do you want on this one?” You manually checked off each and every item that you wanted, including dog dish hubcaps, and that sometimes accounted for strangely optioned cars of that era. There were no option “packages” in those days. I had a 1956 Ford once with automatic transmission and 4-way power seats, but no power steering and no power brakes. Go figure. Dad missed checking power brakes on a fully loaded 67 Merc once and that car sat around for 2 years before it sold. Now if I could only bring back my brother’s red and white 1955 Montclair convertible.
Ford is all about Ford. First and foremost.
During this time, Ford was quite focused on beating Chevrolet and Plymouth. The competition against it at this time was rather clear. This allowed the Corporation to play with Mercury, Lincoln, Continental and Edsel. Mercury went from being an overdressed Ford to being Dearborn marketer’s sandbox. The results for the brand was not good.
These Mercurys are still just Fords. That wasn’t all that bad, but during this time there was a belief that there was a mid-market, professional niche that was expanding and available. Buick, Oldsmobile sales seem to have given Dearborn evidence of this.
But that wasn’t following a plan crafted by Dearborn – it was chasing after a plan crafted for GM, not Ford. Whenever a corporation mimics a competitor’s marketing plan – they are losers, because the plan was never designed for its copy-cats. Ford embraced the GM model, then tried to fill that GM model with Ford products. Well, that was simply stupid. Buick and Oldsmobile saw growth during these years, but it was not simply because of a growing Middle Class. For Ford, and Chrysler to completely reshuffle and spend a fortune following their competitor’s marketing strategy without their competitor’s products was a waste of several fortunes.
Mercurys are fancy Fords – and that is OK!
Now – when the Market wanted Brougham, (fancy Fords), machines, they discovered Mercury during the 1970s. This is really when Mercury was successful being an overdressed Ford.
And why was this OK with Ford?
Because Ford was busy as hell with new competition. It didn’t just have Chevrolet or Plymouth like it did during the 1940s and 1950s. It had entirely new competition that drew Dearborn’s focus into focusing on Ford – not Mercury.
This allowed Mercury to succeed.
When the Market moved on from Brougham vehicles, Mercury was no longer hot. And – by this time Ford was still focusing on Fords. Dressing up Fords for a shrinking Market was a waste of money by the 2000s. The entire car market shifted, and Mercury was out.
Ford never could figure out what to do with the “Big M”. Ironically it was when Ford most allowed Fancy Fords to exist when the Market wanted Fancy Fords, Mercury really thrived.
Bottom line – people who call themselves marketers are dumb as hell and have very little impact on a corporation’s bottom line. When they get listened to and fed with buckets of cash, they wreck the crap out of a corporation. If Ford ignored their marketing department there would not have been an Edsel fiasco, sparing Dearborn a great deal of money.
I don’t like the Mercury lines, meaning the bulges on the sides as opposed to the standard Fords of that year, but that roofline is hard to beat, whether in pillared or pillarless form.
I’m not an especial Ford fan, but a family friend drove one of this vintage – a Ford, two-door sedan stripper, blue & white. I was really impressed with its simplicity and became a fan of these.
Yes – there are some Fords, Mercurys & Lincolns I’m quite fond of, believe-it-or-not!
“The Big M Line” advertised very heavily on Sunday’s “Yours Truly, Johnny Dollar” radio drama. One of the last of the radio shows (along with Gunsmoke) that I remember from our family Sunday rides. Dad and I were both big fans of the show.
WAMU, 88.5, American University’s NPR station in Washington DC, broadcasts “The Big Broadcast” hosted by Ed Walker every Sunday evening. For years “Gunsmoke” has been the most popular feature of the program starring William Conrad as Marshall Matt Dillon. A former popular program was Johnny Dollar, the free-lance insurance investigator with the “action-packed expense account”, but I guess they ran out of episodes as today it’s only occasionally featured. The Big Broadcast is available online live and on I Heart Radio.
Just like it was yesterday, I remember Ed Sullivan extolling the “Big M” on his weekly Sunday evening TV show, “The Toast of the Town.”
A very pretty survivor there .
-Nate
I like this a lot.I’ve always had a soft spot for Mercuries.It was many years later I learned that most of them were Fords under the skin.They were unfairly dismissed as a poor man’s Lincoln or a tarted up Ford,still sorry to see them go despite the very dull range of cars since the Marauder got the bullet
We had plenty of post war Ford and Mercury sedans and coup’es here Mercs were meant to have a bigger motor but for NZ assembly Ford fitted Mercury flathead motors to everything it meant less spares had to be carried by dealers, but by the mid 50s Mercury was gone except for a few private imports.
Ah, the Medalist! This was my driver training car when I was 16 years old… and it too had “three on the tree.” Seemed rather strange, since most Mercs had automatics, but it taught me to drive standard. Maybe Mercury made that special model just for high school driver ed courses!
You were lucky, we got a stripper ’57 Ford Custom, and that was in 1963, it was already six years old and thrashed. It did have an automatic, though. I would have loved the Medalist, so much more upscale!
I saw a very similar car when I went to the LeMay Museum in Tacoma last year. It’s nice to see an old 4-door sedan getting the respect it deserves.
Not a bad effort, really. Call it a high trim deluxe Ford if you will. A lot of ’56 Mopars shared plenty across brands as well. And Chevy / Pontiac were clearly cousins.
I recall reading long ago that the name Medalist was lifted from the Olympic Games that year in Melbourne, Australia. No wonder it was a one shot model, the name and its derivation were probably soon forgotten.
As a nine-year old, I loved these Mercuries. The “Big M” always resonated with me, and it always had an upmarket and upscale cachet in the Ford family. My parents had some friends back then (the husband was an engineer at Lockheed) who drove a ’56 Montclair two-door hardtop, it was a bronze color. They kept it all the way into 1964. I remember it clearly parked in our driveway, and as I was always doing with my parents’ friends’ cars, with the folks in the living room enjoying their martinis, I would be in the driveway investigating every square inch of their car. With Dad’s plain-Jane ’54 Ford Customline sitting a few feet away in the garage, it made for an impressive comparison.
It coulda been worse. A true 50’s Cheapskate Dad would have had a Ford Mainline with black rubber around the windshield and no side trim.
Mercury went through phases like Pontiac and Dodge, trying to be a small step up from ‘low price car’. Dodge successfully stole Plymouth sales, but Mercury was always changing images. From luxury in the 50’s to performance 60’s, back to luxo in 70’s, and then tried to be ‘Euro’ in the 80’s.
The late 60’s Cougar had a good halo effect, and the Panther based Grand Marq succeeded when Buick/Olds dropped RWD tanks. But, once the loyal customers passed on, there were no fresh buyers. Sayonnara. Cse la vie.
The Medalist made one more appearance for 1958 as plain-jane two and four door sedans with the 312 ci engine standard. Given they based-priced at $2547 and $2617, squarely in the Fairlane 500 territory, the 18,732 hardly made them a blockbuster success even in a recession year. The ’56 and ’58 Medalist were something of a preview of the ’61 Mercury Meteor 600 & 800.
I understand the Medalist line reappeared in 1958. As in 1956, it was the lowest priced Mercury, obviously existing for the sole purpose of advertising a Mercury at a low price point. Depending on the source, some say the name Medalist was only used on prototypes or on limited advertisement. Then again, someone on the M-E-L forum wrote that he had purchased a ’58 Medalist and was wanting more information. Some responses indicate this model was a mid-year issue.
2 door – Model 64B / 4 door – Model 58C
I must have been brainwashed by Hockey Night in Canada as a kid. As I always thought the Big ‘M’ was Frank Mahovlich. 🙂
Option me a “Big M” Monclair, TuTone turquoise and white exterior paint, dual exhaust, wide whitewalls with full wheel covers, 3 speed manual with overdrive, power steering and air conditioning.
Might this one pass muster perhaps on Craigslist now.
There’s one of these that shows up at some of the local cruises. Ever since reading this piece the first time, I stop and think “Big M”.
If you rolled one into the ditch, would it be a big W like in Mad Mad Mad Mad World?
Absolutely. And a Big 3 halfway through the rollover.
The ’56 Medalist line has one of the typical 1950’s odd-ball combinations that seem so commonly available then: plain-Jane, stripped versions of a glamour body style, in this case, the four door hardtop ‘Phaeton’.
I learned to drive in a 1956 Mercury Medalist. Dad bought it new from the dealership on Broad Street in Lansdale, PA. I was 10 years old then. Ours was an aqua-white two tone “Phaeton”. Automatic transmission, but otherwise power nothing. Dog dish hubcaps. Radio but no clock. The asymmetric “M” in the center of the steering wheel always bothered me. The salesman sold it on its powerful acceleration. Dad loved the car and kept it for over 15 years.