(first posted 11/11/11) The humble station wagon. Everyone remembers the glamorous wood-bodied versions from the 1930s and 40s and even the behemoths of the 1970s. But in the 1950s, there was no more iconic vehicle than the station wagon, and this weary Pontiac is a rare survivor of that era.
The station wagon was a creature of necessity. Through the 1930s and 40s, large families were the exception rather than the rule, and normal sedans took care of them just fine. Chrysler did a small but steady business in stretched 7 passenger sedans like Howard Cunningham’s DeSoto Suburban, but these were rarities.
But 1946 began what became known as the baby boom. From 1940 to 1960, number of families with 3 kids doubled, and the number with 4 kids quadrupled. By 1957, the boom had reached its peak with 4.3 million new babies and a modern record of 3.77 children per family. And all of these kids had the annoying habit of making friends who were inclined to ride along when it was time go somewhere in the family car.
A basic sedan was not going to be enough car for the modern family of the 1950s. So, just as the American auto industry would mark phenomenal growth of the minivan three decades hence, the 1950s saw explosive growth of another new market segment: the all-steel, sedan-based, three-row station wagon.
Station wagons had been around since the Model T and before, but it took a long time to get all of the wood out of these things. Although Willys was first with the Jeep, the 1949 Plymouth Suburban was the first of the mass market offerings. Chevrolet was there in 1950 and Pontiac, of course, came along for the ride as well. Ford was among the last entries, with its all steel 1952 wagons. Along with the nation’s growing families, the transition from wood bodies to steel would be why station wagons went from less than 3% of production in 1950 to nearly 17% by 1960.
By 1957, virtually everyone was in the wagon business, because the family car market was where a significant chunk of volume (and the money that went with it) was. Pontiac was no exception.
The 1957 Pontiac station wagons were an interesting juxtaposition of two opposing philosophies. Pontiac, under the leadership of Bunkie Knudsen, was beginning its quest to become America’s favorite performance car. This year saw the new Bonneville kick the Star Chief from the top perch on the totem pole. The Bonneville was one hot car, with Tri Power or even Rochester fuel injection, giving the car admission to that exclusive club that required 300 horsepower as a condition of membership.
But Pontiac was not just about the performance market, and offered quite a few wagons in 1957, all of which would be called Safari. The 1956 Safari had been a single model that shared Chevrolet’s unique Nomad body. The Nomad-based Safari was back for 1957 (as the Star Chief Custom Safari), but it had a lot of company. In addition to this basic nine-passenger Chieftain Safari (which also came as a 2 door), there was the higher level Super Chief Safari.
Pontiac must have decided that four station wagon offerings were not enough, and at mid year brought us the ultimate Poncho wagon: the Star Chief Custom four door Safari, also known as the Transcontinental. After the Bonneville, this was the most expensive Pontiac in the book, which probably accounts for its sales of a bit under 1,900 units. Maybe our west coast correspondents can keep their eyes peeled for one of these rarities. It would be my guess that the ladies in this illustration were not among those with the 3.77 children.
Unfortunately, sales at Pontiac were down fairly substantially across the board in 1957, to roughly 330,000 units (from over a half million in 1955). This is probably owing to new models in the Mercury and Dodge showrooms. Even our subject car, the four door Chieftain 9 passenger Safari, was never a very common car, with sales of about 11,500. Altogether, Pontiac sold nearly 32,000 wagons in 1957.
Although this Chieftain model was the most basic of Pontiac wagons, it was assuredly no strippo. Just look at the level of trim, both inside and out. As was often the case in these years, the buyer who elected to move up from a Chevrolet was rewarded handsomely. The Pontiac Strato Streak V8 was up to 347 cubes for 1957. This was not much smaller than Cadillac’s 365 cubic inch mill. Also, that beefy V8 was mated with either a 3 speed manual (rarely) or the same Dual Range Hydra Matic as was in Oldsmobiles and Cadillacs. This Pontiac wagon was a lot of car for the money in 1957.
We all know that styling is a subjective thing. Pontiac seems to have done a reasonably good job of differentiating itself from its little brother, if not exactly disguising its Chevrolet A body roots. The increase to 122 inches of wheelbase in even the lower models didn’t hurt here. This Pontiac fits squarely into the Harley Earl school of automotive design – lots of chrome and flash. Not a lot of subtlety or understatement here. I have always wondered how it was Pontiac and not Oldsmobile that got its sides plastered with a huge rocket that spewed stars as exhaust.
With a 1957 Dodge parked nearby, however, this car would have looked dated pretty quickly, and reminds us all why the Forward Look was so influential.
One thing I have never understood is that upside-down V on the hood. I understood it when Pontiac was still being powered by the ancient straight 8, but why did it continue after the modern V8 came along in 1955? Wasn’t a big chrome V federally mandated in those years? It certainly seemed so. It also appears that Chief Pontiac was on the way out of town even in 1957.
It is kind of hard today to imagine 9 people spending much time in one of these. Looking at it in person, the car just isn’t that big. But we should remember that in those days before seat belts became common (let alone child safety seats), any den mother or football coach could cram a dozen kids inside without half trying, so I suppose that a mere nine would have been fairly comfortable. And in a ’57 Pontiac, everyone got to sit looking forward.
I spied this car along the road in a consignment lot in Evansville, Indiana on a recent trip to the city. Thinking back, I am not sure I can ever recall seeing a ’57 Poncho wagon in the flesh (metal?) This one is a little rough, but is in amazingly good shape for an original wagon. After all, station wagons would be passed down from family to family (in order of decreasing resources) and then to a tradesman or two who would generally wring every last bit of life out of them. Other than a lot of surface rust, this car looks pretty solid. Rocker panels did not usually last this well in the midwest during this car’s heyday.
I have been trying to figure out the color combination on this one. I cannot imagine a green car with a red and white interior coming out of the GM system in those days. That sounds more like one of those early 70s Chrysler anomalies that we have all heard about. Maybe the green was a repaint. Or maybe the car was special ordered by a department store Santa. Who knows? What I do know is that this car makes me nostalgic for a time before the 1960s when GM would give you a full set of gauges even in the low level model. The truth is, whoever bought this car new got a heckuva package, even if the styling was a little overdone.
I am glad that the place was closed on the day I stopped to photograph this Safari. This is the kind of car that calls my name. Even though the logical side of my brain would tell me to run away as fast as I possibly can, the other side says “Come on – some fresh paint, a new set of whitewalls, and we can all go out for ice cream.”
So, who will start us out with 99 bottles of beer on the wall? And no, we are not there yet, so you will just have to hold it until we stop for gas.
JP, now that’s one version of the Safari I have never seen, just the Nomad-based one. That Chrysler wagon you showed sure out-classed it in the styling department, at least! The Safari pictured should go back to the jungle to rot – it’s halfway there, anyway!
As I get older, increasingly, the only old iron I have a serious interest in – as far as actually owning is concerned – are the few cars I grew up around, like dad’s 1950 Plymouth (in which I almost fell out of one day!), his 1955 Dodge Royal Lancer, 1960 & 1966 Impala sports sedans, my avatar and my 1972 Nova.
My current ride – my 2004 Impala is the closest I could come to owning my dad’s car! Perhaps that’s why I love it so.
As the owner of a ’57 Chevy 210 Handyman, also a project…it’s hard for me to look at the Pontiac – especially from the rear – and not think of how much more…well, stuff is hung on the Poncho.
That said, the 7″ longer wheelbase (a few inches of it is ahead of the windshield) and extra gingerbread help provide quite a bit of differentiation from the Chevy.
Also interesting to see an extra set of vents at the front of the rear side windows. Don’t think I’ve ever see that before.
The Pontiac and the Chevy share front doors. Not so sure about the rears….they might be a tad longer. The tailgate would interchange.
Hope somebody snaps it up soon. In the meantime, someone close that lower tailgate…I’m not sure how much of the rear inner sheetmetal is being reproduced. Fortunately my Handyman is still pretty solid back there…
It occurs to me that the little vent pane in the rear quarter window may have been the cheap fix to add a little length and still share that expensive piece of curved glass used in the Chevy.
Another idea – a close look at the brochure shows it on only the Chieftain, not the Super Chief. Because only the Chieftain came as a 9 psgr, maybe that vent was only for the cars with 3 row seating for the benefit of those in the way-back seat.
I would assume so too. I can’t remember seeing it either before, but than as you said, 9 pass Chieftains aren’t exactly common. Great find.
Dad’s first new car was this, 9 pass Chieftain. Grey and white exterior w/ same on interior. I remember the speedometer was a bar.
The 3rd seat stayed in the garage the whole time – too much trouble. Same reason he kept snow tires on it all year. For the heater to work well in the winter cardboard was placed in front of the radiator.
A Pontiac wagon guy, his next was the revolutionary 1961 Tempest Safari. Mom got the Chieftain until he got his 1964 Catalina Safari and she the Tempest.
There were a few old Pontiac wagons roaming the Earth when I was a little sprout…but I never saw one with that vent-in-the-rear-glass treatment.
Neither did the Pontiac Art Department, apparently. I’m thinking, Custom job – as with the paint; and the overall kind treatment and preservation. This was maybe someone’s pride and joy.
The vent window would have been tempting for a garage customizer – exactly the size of a front-door vent; use all the same hardware; just cut the glass and mount a divider.
Oh, if I had a few extra thousand and garage space…
A careful look at the yellow Chieftain wagon on the brochure page shows the little rear quarter vent window. The other four door (the blue Super Chief) did not have one as the Super Chief only came in a six passenger version. It is also missing from the Star Chiefs in the ads, but I think that the Star Chief was a six passenger car as well.
You’re correct JP. The little vent windows only came on the 9 passenger versions. A neighbors ’57 Chieftan 6 passenger wagon did not have them and they would have made little sense, as they were located behind the 2nd row passengers.
In the 50’s and 60’s wagons were as popular as SUV’s are today. They were considered quite upscale and desirable. Ford seemed to be particularly adept at wagons, introducing innovations like the 3 way doorgate and dual facing rear seats. In my neighborhood a Country Squire had as much cachet as a Cadillac.
As a long time Pontiac fan you hit on what I’ve always thought – what a great value they were. A ’63 Catalina was about $50 more than an Impala. For that 50 bucks you got not only a bigger car, but 100 more cubic inches and a 3 speed HM over Powerglide.
This is a 9 Passenger Wagon and I believe (if memory serves me) it was only available on the 9 passenger American Pontiacs.
I had a 57 Pontiac Laurentian 2Dr. Ht (for 40 yrs) and a 57 Pontiac Safari 4 Dr. Wagon.
The Canadian version(s) of Pontiac are a Chevy dressed up to look like a Pontiac.(Chevy in Sheep’s Clothing)
The frame, running gear, brakes, suspension etc. are all the same.
The Chev 6 Cylinder was a 235 Cu In, the Pontiac a 261 (lots of go) and the V/8 was a 283. Some people were even lucky to get a power pak version also. The blocks were painted green (both)
Pontiac shared a lot of the accessories (some with a Pontiac Chief’s head instead of the Bow Tie trade mark.)
Actually Pontiac Racing Division was shown with a 283 with Dual Quads on the Dyno – -my 57 HT still has the Dual quads on the ORIGINAL V/8 S/N block for the car (matches the VIN plate).
My station wagon was totally (and still is today) bone stock and the old farmer that had it originally only had back up lites as an accessory and a white top painted by the dealers back then.I waas the second owner buying the car with about 32,000 miles on it.
When I repainted the car i added all the accessories I could finf including NOS Spot Lite, Sun Visor, Illuminated fender spears wide whites etc. etc. It used to take awards in the face of the American Safari version wagons,
Now that was a barn find.in excellent condition. The interior still had the plastic bumpy factory seat covers on it.
Oh yes, International Harvester used the Pontiac 261 engines in their combines etc.
AAAhhhh another trip down memory lane.
A picture added
Hi Fred
You seem to have a lot of knowledge on the 1957 283 Pontiac’s. I actually have an original 1957 Laurentian 283/220 “Super Strato-Flash”. I’d like to find out how many you’ve seen over the years and if you’ve ever seen a higher hp Pontiac in 1957 ie. 250hp, 283hp versions? Thanks, Steve.
Chas, this is an example of why you read before you type. Was trying to figure a good reason for a family to buy one of these over a chev. 283 is large enough for everything but hot rodding.
Recently ran across one of these painted with that ubiquitous rust color. It’s busy returning to earth. This one has a chance of surviving.
My family had a 1958 Pontiac Custom Safari blue/silver. It was apparently a top-line model – it had the “autronic” automatic headlight dimmer. It had a cruise control operated from a small knob on the dash. The most unique feature was the “trans-portable” Delco radio. The radio could be slid out from a slot in the dash and used as a portable radio – transistor radios were quite the fad of the day. It suffered some kind of failure very early-on and was replaced with a normal permanent radio. I also recall the translucent Indian head hood ornament that lit up.
Love it, but I love all things wagon. I’m thinking about the full hotrod treatment but wide whitewalls just for the fun of it.
I love this Poncho’s face…. love it love it love it.
The 14″ wheels do look a bit petite. That change from 15s for 1957 was dubious, especially for a big wagon.
But Oooooooo – how long, low and swoopy those 14 inchers make that old 1955 body shell look! Maybe not.
Still looks like it has too much crown in the roof. I can understand that you’d need headroom to fit nine in that body, though.
While 50s cars aren’t my cup o tea so much, I do love wagons and gassers.
I can already see it done up in the red on black or maybe a silver/red combo (with the windshield visor and red wheels please), towing a 55 Chevy Gasser up to Great Lakes Dragaway.
I have a son at Indiana University – cream and crimson are the school colors – and would see this as a great tailgater for football games, painted in colors to match the interior. Can’t you just smell the brats cooking?
Aauuugggh. Must. Stop. Thinking. About. This. Car!
This is a home run, and not because I like the car. It’s the first car I remember my dad buying. I’m recalling it was 1962, and I was around 5. I was with my dad when he traded off his light green ’52 Dodge to a local Pontiac dealer and bought this very four-door model — very light green trimmed with dark green. Don’t know what he paid, but his style was to buy a model on which somebody else paid the depreciation.
We had a big family, too, and you knew where you ranked according to where you had to sit. Dad did the driving, with Mom in the front passenger seat. The three “older kids” in the middle seat. I was one of the “three little kids” who were relegated to the back. I don’t know what options it had, but I do know it had no AC, and on family outings, they’d prop up tailgate window (it had two positions — flush with the roof or propped at a 45-degree angle above the roofline.
It was a less-than-dependable car, as I recall, and I remember riding in it fas it was towed at least once. But it did accommodate. I do remember the family taking in at least one drive-in move in the thing.
Dad finally unloaded it about five years later for a low-miles, jet-black ’61 Dodge 4-door, and the process started over.
I think the 1957’s are the best looking of the 1955-57 Pontiacs, which oddly (I assume) give you all of the virtues of a Tri Five Chevy with a Hydra-Matic.
I think, since the Tri 5’s were more nimble in size (narrower) and possibly better handlers than B body Oldses and Buicks. I wonder if Pontiac ever played up these advantages during these years…..
Do those adverts say Bulgemobile or what! I particularly like the upholstery with giant chrome ‘burn-o-ramic’ googies in the seatback- perfect for giving a backache, or in the summer causing third degree burns coming back from the swimming pool. These chrome back-burners somehow survived into the 70s, when safety legislation found that flush headlamps were a risk to life and limb, yet these scourge of many children born between 1940-1980 managed to survive.
The one pictured in the “all-steel” ad made me think of the PT Cruiser.
I liked the pic of the ’56 Ford wagon full of kids with the 55/56 NY suburban plate showing so well. One would think that the special plate for station wagons would be a thing of the 50’s, but not so: New York started issuing them in 1931 and didn’t stop until sometime in the 60’s. A few other states did too – Maine, Connecticut, Virginia are the ones that come to mind.
A friend had a 1957 Star Chief hardtop in white and bronze with the leather seats. This was still a great looking car at the time (mid-1970’s) but on its last legs mechanically, with the Hydramatic only functioning in 2nd and 4th and the windshield wiper cables fallen apart. On the highway it still could remind us of what a nice car it’d once been. By that time, though, nice Star Chiefs were already expensive.
New York still puts vehicle class on its’ windshield stickers and still uses “SUBN” for station wagons, even if it’s a Ford Focus.
Awesome find and its in good order an easy resto.
It is interesting to see the stats on family sizes, I would have thought there would have been larger families pre-WW2 or at least pre-Depression era. For example my grandfather was one of 12 or 13 children in the 1920’s and we are not Catholic! That was in an era of higher infant mortality, and indeed one of his siblings died at a young age.
My great-aunt told me a great story how on a Saturday night a group of her friends would go into town (from farms) for the weekly dance, with up to 10 people crammed into a Pontiac wagon, zooming up the dirt roads at 80-90mph including over the irrigation channel bridges which would see the car fly for dozens of feet. Not something I would like to try with slow 1950’s steering boxes!
With the demise of the Magnum are there any US wagons left?
Birth rates were higher before the 1930s, but dropped fairly substantially during the depression and WWII. IIRC, the peak in the fifties only got back to levels seen in the twenties, but never seen since.
As for modern wagons, I count the Ford Flex, although a lot of people want to call it a crossover.
Of course in the 30s, family road trips were much less common due to the road network and cars were not really made to travel thousands of miles to Wally World, so 8 passenger cars weren’t really needed. In addition, people either lived in small towns or inner-cities before the war. It wasn’t until the post-war white flight that people needed large cars to transport their children around the non-walkable suburbs. I remember growing up in isolated suburbia when our Krappy early K-Kar wouldn’t start just how marooned one felt not being able to get anywhere on foot. It should be noted the unholy (although never articulated) alliance between property developers, motorway planners and car manufacturers who conspired to ensure that public transport was not a viable option to the newly mortgaged middle class nuclear families.
Love this old wagon. Yes, I suppose it could be called over styled but that would be in comparison with the majority of cars today that have no style. The days that these old relics could be daily drivers are long over, but whenever I take my old wagon out for a drive it never fails to elicit comments from all sorts of people. This not because it is old, or a highly desirable collectible. It is because it simply doesn’t look like anything else on the road.
That old Pontiac does look solid enough to be an easy restoration, but it sure wouldn’t be cheap. Just the bill for re-plating all of that fine chrome trim would be most impressive. This was a great article.
I always thought the inverted V came from the B52.
BUFF is a Hangerside classic. It has had the highest readiness rate among USAF bomber types. Love the way they take off – no rotation.
The inverted V is meant to signify aeroplane wings.
I remember going to a friends, grandfathers farm circa 1970? . Anyway the old dude had 57 Pontiac Pathfinder wagon as his daily driver. Now keep in mind a thirteen year old car still on the road,was a rare sight in Southern Ontario.The old farmer had poured used motor oil into every crack, and cranny, of the bare bones Poncho.It was ugly and dirty,but very little rust.
Crank windows,no air, a plate over the radio space, rubbermats,no carpet.
I do recall that the old wagon had a 283 with three on the tree.
I just hope that somebody got a hold of that very rare car,before it went to the crusher.
57 Pontiac Wagon;
I remember my Dad buying one of these from Grant Brown Pontiac,Buick, in Toronto Canada in 1957. It was yellow with a white roof and blue and white interior. He told me later in life that it was one of only 3 imported to Canada, and it came from the factory with a six pak. I can still remember him pulling out to pass someone doing 50 mph, hitting the gas and laying rubber. My Mother refused to ride in it because of the power and he sold it the following year. Talk about rare!
Hello GM… Lots of people/families are still missing the new practical 8 seater stawags! Bring ’em back to the production… When we got a Safari then 1 car had been enough for all of our family purposes. Now we have to have a minivan…with the lack of the cargo capacity and for the job we need another sedan. It’s two cars, two insurances, two things to be serviced and two ecological footprints. Former station wagon had incorporated all of the needs…in one car…and smaller eco-footprint…
Back in the 50s when I was growing up, Ford and Chevy wagons dominated in my rural Pennsylvania area. If you wanted to drive a flashy wagon you went with a Dodge or Mercury. Pontiac wagons didn’t hit the local roads until the early 60s…about the time the brand’s performance credentials were established and Mercury’s started a slow decline.
Green with a red and white interior? Looking at some older sales material you can find that color combos were A LOT looser in the 50s,60s, and 70s than they are today. Of course there were a lot more colors of interiors, too.
If I were buying an older Pontiac wagon, I would NOT even consider any year before 1959….UNLESS it was one of the Tri-Five 2 door Safaris. Then it would be a toss-up between 56 and 57.
I appreciate the popularity of the modern minivan but I REALLY like station wagons. We try to always have one in the family fleet. (My mother and her partner still drive a 1996 Buick Estate Wagon.)
Currently my wife’s Ford Flex does the best job of duplicating the comfort and utility of the station wagons my family had when I was young.
I wish Dodge would bring back an updated version of the Magnum.
Someone save this car please.
I love all ’57 Pontiacs. In 1968, I was 10, and my grandfather showed up for a visit with my 2 aunts in a ’57 4 door pillarless hardtop red and white Starchief. What a great car! The red was a little faded, but it was in beautiful shape. Great cruiser on the freeway, with 5 adults and 2 kids. What made it more fascinating to a 10-year old was that the previous owner was an amputee and the hand controls were still in place. There are not many GM cars I lust after, but that is one.
My family’s first new car was a ’57 Dodge wagon, still legandary for its lemony badness. In true Chrysler fashion, all the interior door handles promptly fell off and it went through 2 transmissions as soon as the factory warranty was up. Interestingly, it was replaced by a ’61 Valiant, 3-in-the floor. My dad wouldn’t buy another automatic until 1972.
What a sweet car and so original too ! .
Sadly this will prolly get junked for the front sheet metal or destroyed by a ‘ resto rodder ‘ tosser .
This is another good example of rare not equaling valuable .
I do hope some one saves it .
BTW : those Canadian Pontiacs with the 261 I6 ? that’s a Chevrolet truck engine and is supposed to be painted green .
-Nate
This is a neat car but the wagons from Chrysler during this period are so much more beautiful! I do love wagons, and have owned that bodystyle more than any other. My current ride is a 2004 Focus wagon. In the 90s I had a Pontiac 6000 wagon and it had vent windows in the rearmost glass, like this pic.
Judging from the style of Kentucky license plate, this old wagon made it at least into the early 21st Century with that awful “smiley face” plate on the rear bumper as some kind of driver. When those things came out Kentuckians hated them so much that we were willing to spend extra money for a specialty plate to keep from having the embarrassment of that stupid Wal Mart looking “smiley face”. Quite a few of those plates got creatively defaced.
It might be that the rockers are still intact because one or more previous owners of this wagon kept it off the road in the winter time. Kentucky uses a lot of salt on the roads, and around the greater Lexington area in amounts disproportionate to actual conditions.
I must have missed this one the first time around; this here’s a curbside classic to beat em all.
JP, I get the same impulses for going for ice cream or tailgating when I see these. I love old wagons, though the only Pontiac I ever rode in was the Bonneville-Parisienne Safari in the 1980s. A friend’s mother had one and I’m quite sure we and some other kiddos did indeed go for ice cream in it!
This article brought a smile to my face.
This is a great curbside classic, loved rereading it. Brings back lots of memories growing up in the 50’s. Station wagons were everywhere in Southern Cal, seems like practically every family had one (not ours, though, even with two kids, Dad always opted for 2-door hardtops for the family hauler). The ’56 Ford wagon stuffed with kids reminded me so of piling into friends’ parent’s wagons, the more, the merrier (and as you note, not a care in the world about seat belts or child safety, mind you). I remember going to a day camp one summer, the guy who ran it had a nine passenger ’55 Mercury Colony Park (were they called Colony Parks that early?), and driving us all over L.A. to various venues, kids crammed into every available seat. And going for ice cream, yeah, we did that often, seems like it was a regular thing in my Cub Scout days, or at other kids’ birthday parties, and we would all caravan down to the nearest Baskin Robbins 31 Flavors store in a flotilla of station wagons. I still remember sitting rearward in one mother’s ’57 or ’58 Dodge station wagon, I believe it was, and taking off en masse for a friend’s birthday celebration. Another friend’s father, who was a doctor, had a ’57 Safari wagon, yellow and white, rode in it often. It always felt like such an upscale car to this ten year old.
You mention the upside down V (sort of the reverse of the ’56 Packard trunk emblem), and that Chief Pontiac was on the way out of town. Once again, great styling cues that were unceremoniously dumped. Loved that lighted up Indian head hood ornament, and the famous Silver Streaks that were so Pontiac, gone for ’57. And your description of the side trim rocket spewing little exhaust stars, priceless (it grew even larger for ’58, too)! I was interested to see the Star Chief Custom Safari, must have been really rare, as much of a car spotter as I was back then, I don’t ever remember seeing one of these with that odd side trim, reminds me of the ’56 DeSoto.
Anyway, a great reread, nicely done, thanks for a fun nostalgia trip.
I always wondered who had the first mainstream all-steel station wagon, Plymouth. Oddly, coming from Chrysler, maker of the Town and Country wood bodied convertible.
I knew about the Jeep, but very few of those were sold. A four cylinder 4×4 was not on very many families shopping lists back then.
Weren’t all ’57 Bonnevilles built with fuel injection? It was a major feature of the car and a key element that made it so exclusive. So Tri-Power wasn’t an issue with them unless added later by a dealer as it wasn’t offered on Bonnevilles. Also, the ’57 Bonneville engine was a 370-cubic-inch unit, not a 347 like the rest of the line.
Yes, all 630 ’57 Bonnevilles had FI, but it was on the 347 inch V8, not the 370. That did not arrive until 1958.
They had the fuel-injected engine as an option in ’58 too, and it was the 370.
Here’s the best picture of the badge that I could find, sorry it’s small:
EDIT: Crap, nevermind – I misinterpreted your reply. I’m leaving this here anyway, for the picture!
My error. Collectible Automobile had it as a 370 in its December 1986 ’30 years of Bonnevilles’ story (writer: Arch Brown) and the mistake was repeated in ‘Encyclopedia of American Cars 1930-1980.’
Odd, Because my Encyclopedia of American Cars 1930-1980 says it was a 347. They must have fixed that mistake, and perhaps that’s how it got into the CA article. But it shouldn’t have. If it had been a 370 with FI, it would have had more hp for sure.
It seems interesting that 2 door station wagons seemed to fail in the sales department but that 2 door SUVs such as the Cherokee, S-10 Blazer/ S-15 Jimmy which are simply glorified station wagons sold in droves.
…its sides plastered with a huge rocket that spewed stars as exhaust.
Oh I love that… perfect description of this car. I’d really like to imagine it came from the factory in green, white and red, too.
I’m a little late with this response, but just now read this wonderful article and all the neat responses to it..wow! I’ve attached a picture (.pdf…hope it takes!) of my older sister’s 57 Chieftan and hope you can see it well…solid car that probably saved her life…I helped her buy it from a neighbor in 1965 with the hope I could buy it from her when I came of age..she managed to wreck it to thwart that goal. The 347 in that car had mucho power!
The year after this accident my parents bought their only new car, a 1966 Ford Ranch Wagon, and our family of 5 took a 1 month vacation (very few family vacations prior to this one) with loaded up Sear’s roof rack, pop up camper with coolers strapped on top, and went all the way to Disneyland… way similar to the Griswald’s trip to Wallyworld! What memories! A year later my Dad had a massive stroke and heart attack, and the family was never the same….but the good memories sure remain. Thanks for this article!