(first posted 5/30/2012) The early sixties was the most fertile era for so many things, including motorhomes. In 1960, the Big Three unleashed their new compacts, including the rugged slant six Valiant and the bold rear-engined Corvair. Perhaps stimulated by them, two radically new RVs appeared in 1963 and 1964, with completely new approaches to their body structure, configuration, suspension, and power trains. The compact 1963 Clark Cortez is one of them, America’s first modern front wheel drive RV; the other is the Corvair-engined UltraVan (CC here). Although both were radically new, they were polar opposites in almost every way possible, most especially in their weight. Given that the Cortez was made by forklift manufacturer Clark, guess which one weighed more? Way more.
A brief re-cap: up to this time, almost all motor homes were built on large truck chassis; big, tall, ponderous, rough-riding, crude-handling and thirsty. During this creative era, this approach was seen as less than satisfactory in a number of ways by at least a few bold folks, and our two revolutionaries felt that more compact, advanced and efficient alternatives were the way to go.
I’ve often wondered what exactly motivated Clark, which built the world’s first seated and counterbalance forklift in 1917, to enter the risky RV business. But why they chose to build it with front wheel drive is probably easier to answer: forklifts are all fwd! It probably also helps explains why the Cortez has a very hefty all-steel unibody.
This site (cortezcoach.com) has a treasure trove of historical Cortez photos, but no captions. But there’s several of this particular and unique one, which must be the original prototype. All dressed up to take the missus for a camping trip; she’s even got her hat box in hand. Just like the Niedermeyers heading off to the boonies.
As you can see already, this is very much a “compact” motor home, drastically so for today’s standards, with an overall length of just 18.5 feet. And a low height, thanks to its fwd. It rather corresponds to the compact one-story ranch houses that were so popular at the time.
It appears that the original prototype on the left gave way to the pre-production prototype on the right, which looks much like the final design. But what’s under the skin is what’s interesting.
Unlike the typically lightly framed, aluminum skinned RV on a ladder frame, the Cortez is built like a bus, or tank, or…forklift. The whole unitized structure is made up of substantial steel, all welded together, including steel external panels. There were two downsides to that, which we’ll get to later, but they’re not hard to guess.
But instead of old pictures, let’s use the example I saw in traffic and instantly followed. I’ve been infatuated with the Cortez forever, lusted after one repeatedly, and have been rather desperate to find one to share with you. There used to be one right down the street, but before my CC days. They’re certainly easy to spot, with their distinctive shape and rear door. And fortunately, it was headed for Wal Mart.
It was a fortuitous thing that I needed to run that an errand just then and stumbled into this one, as it’s not just any old Cortez, but Serial# 29, one of the first of 3,211 Cortezes ever built. Its new owner just bought it in California, after it had been sitting in a field for over a dozen years. It’s a bit rough, but it’s going to get a complete restoration. Maybe we’ll do a follow-up.
Before we take a tour, maybe this shot will help put the Cortez in perspective. Did I already say it was just over eighteen feet long and very compact? On the outside, that is. The Cortez is surprisingly roomy inside, and back in the day could sleep up to six happy campers.
Although the rear-door motorhome is now considered obsolete, it does have some decided advantages in a short and compact RV, given that it doesn’t intrude into the main cabin. It makes for an efficient and snug cabin layout, a lot like those in a boat. Given that my own 18′ Chinook has a similar rear-door configuration, I’m probably a bit biased. But it does have some obvious advantages for maximum space utilization, and the Cortez has front doors for both the driver and passenger.
The bathroom is behind that first door on the left, just like in my Chinook. I’m already guessing it’s going to be very “vintage”.
Sure enough, I’m not disappointed. Turquoise was big in 1963. It’s a fairly roomy “bath”, and designed to be used as a shower too. Across the hall from the bath is a very large closet; some early versions had twin bunks in that space. Big families back then!
The Cortez kitchen is a roomy one, running almost the full length of the main compartment. Many smaller RVs today have only the most rudimentary cooking facilities; microwaves rule.
Here’s how the kitchen (and its COO) looked in their prime years.
The dinette also doubles as one of the beds. What I really like about this Cortez cabin, and our Chinook, is that they both have very large windows and are a pleasant cabin to be in, and from which to enjoy the beautiful scenery inevitably outside the window, since we shun RV campgrounds/parking lots like the plague.
There are few more delightful things than to be sitting at the beach or a mountain lake in our Chinook having lunch or afternoon tea, reading a good book or magazine, while the wind blasts down the rugged coastline. Most new RVs have small windows; I guess folks are looking at their electronic screens more than the scenery. Dinner in the Cortez is ready! Eighteen feet can be surprisingly roomy.
The second front bed is made up by lifting up the front dinette seatback, and hooking its special heavy-duty strap to an anchor in that solid steel roof. The front two-thirds of that upper bunk comes from the passenger seat, which the owner has, but is not installed now.
Here’s how that looks when all the pieces are there; split-level sleeping, for up to four, if you like that sort of thing. Hey, it was the sixties.
Enough of all the domestic stuff. Let’s get to the bridge, and the business end of the Cortez. Looks promising, with that big manly shift lever sticking out of the floor. Old-new school indeed.
Before we look at what’s in front of that transmission, here’s a fine solid all-steel dashboard indeed. Clark’s forklift roots are evident everywhere. Although the steering wheel looks to be proprietary, the instruments look rather familiar. And I’m 99% certain that they are from the same company that supplied the engine.
I slipped the heavy and chunky shift gate back on, so that you can see what the Cortez driver has to guide him on his many shifts.
Here’s what that long lever connects to, the Cortez’ four-speed fully-synchronized transaxle. Did that stem from a forklift? Sure looks like it might have. This unit is one of the Cortez’ potential weak spots. Don’t expect Aamco to have one in stock.
This might a good time to point out something nobody else has regarding the Cortez. Its configuration isn’t all that original, as it mimics Citroen’s legendary H-Van very closely, from the engine out front ahead of the transaxle, to the individual trailing arm rear suspension that makes for an extremely low floor height. The H-Van was a popular camper conversion for the hip set in 1960s-1970s Europe.
Why the funny protruding grille? Well, that grille comes off, and after the bumper is removed, the whole power train assembly in its cradle can be slid out, after six hefty bolts are undone. Well, that’s the Cliff’s Notes version. But it’s also an idea taken from the Traction Avant Citroens.
Tada! Lift up the inside “hood”, and what do we see? You recognize a Chrysler Slant Six when you see one, don’t you? Yup, a heavy-duty truck version of the 225 inch³ (3.7 L) six, making 140 (gross) horsepower. Yes, the four-speed gets a workout, and the low gearing keeps the cruising speed of these six cylinder Cortezes at about 55 – 60 mph. But they can get up to 15 – 16 mpg, allegedly. On the flat, at an easy pace, with maybe a tailwind.
Here we see the whole front end unit, suspension and all. Worried about whether 140 hp is adequate? Well, it is a “compact” RV, you know.
But not a light one, by any means. All that heavy forklift inspired steel does add up, to some 8000-9000 lbs. That may not sound too horrible from today’s perspective, but let’s just say that’s about three times as much as that other revolutionary RV, the airplane-inspired Ultra Van, and the UV is quite a bit bigger too, a full 22 feet. with a rear bedroom. The slant six gets a constant workout hauling almost five tons fully loaded, but then slant sixes were used in lots of medium-sized trucks back in the slow, old days. It can take it, if you’re patient.
Weight is only part of the story. The bigger problem is that the Cortez wants to endlessly shed its weight, through the process of oxidization. Fighting rust everywhere in these is a big and never-ending challenge, since there was little or no rust-inhibiting process used when they were welded up. My fiberglass Chinook is starting to look real good right about now. This Cortez is from California, so it’s been relatively spared, given its age.
Beginning in 1969, the Cortez switched to Ford engines, either a six (probably the 300) or the 302 V8. And in 1971, a big change: the Toronado fwd drive train became available, with its three-speed automatic and 455 cubic inch big block V8. That took care of the power issue, as well as the fuel economy one. Many owners of early slant-six Cortez have swapped in the excellent Chrysler 360 V8, as shown here being mated to the Clark transaxle via a customized marine bellhousing. If it’s like the 360 in my Chinook, it should be good for about 11-12 mpg.
While we’re deviating from our tour, how about a bit more Cortez history? In addition to camping and such, the Cortez was also marketed as an ambulance, mobile office, sales room, and NASA astronaut shuttle.
Clark also considered some other variations, like this king-sized Econoline-ish truck. Empty, I’d say the front-rear weight distribution probably would have set some kind of record, as the Cortez already carried over 60% on its front wheels; more like 65%. BTW, the Cortez was built in Battle Creek, MI.
In 1970, Clark sold off its less-than madly-successful RV operation to Kent Industries, which moved production to Ohio. It also added a foot to its length, as well as a side door. Keeping up with the times.
In 1975, Kent was also ready to pull the plug, along with so many other RV manufacturers after the energy crisis. A group of 26 Cortez owners bought the production line, and set up a company to keep them coming a bit longer. The latest ones added more length, and now weighed some 12,000 lbs or more. This one’s a 1977, just a year before the last one was built.
Let’s get back to our tour, but for the remaining portion, we’re going to get out knees dirty and take a look at the undersides; no proper Niedermeyer tour is complete without that, thanks to my preference for sturdy work pants. Here’s the view of the front suspension; all very heavy-duty stuff indeed, as a one might expect from a maker of forklifts. Front springing was via torsion bars, which connected to the upper control arm, and went forwards from there. It’s the top bar, terminating into that big black rubber bushing.
Here’s the same stuff from behind. The drive shaft is apparent here, as is the curved bottom of the cradle. The drive shafts used conventional universal joints, not CVs, which means it’s best not to make tight turns with anything but minimal power; coasting even, if possible. Binding and premature wear are the consequences of not doing so.
The rear suspension consists of two single trailing arms on each side, with a coil spring. This would be a good time to point out one of the Cortez’ best features: thanks to fully independent suspension front and rear, and a very low center of gravity, it had a superb ride and excellent handling. Probably better than some of the cars of the time. And all that weight only added to its “Cadillac ride”. No comparison to the tall and ponderous motorhomes typical of the times.
The center section has a nice smooth “belly pan”, except that it’s made out of plywood! Which is pretty heavily weathered, in this case. Maybe the weight was getting out of control. Or the expenses. Cortezes were not cheap, which is what kept sales down.
Especially after Winnebago exploded the RV market wide open, with their tract-home approach to mass-production, which cut motor home prices in half. Outfits like Cortez were doomed, which probably explains why Clark sold off the division two years after the Winnebago F17 (CC here) appeared. A total of 3211 Cortezes were built in its fifteen years; probably about what Winnebago spit out in a month or less, in a non-recession year.
But the Cortez has become immortal, with a strong cult following. Its devoted owners who have learned how to stop the rust and keep their transaxles working, if they haven’t just swapped in a Toronado drive train. Shame! The slant six is perfect for these thrifty, high gas price times. Who’s in a hurry?
I’m immensely drawn to the Cortez; its size, packaging and space utilization are exactly perfect for our needs. And its fwd cradle could easily support just about any modern fwd drive train, especially a turbo-diesel from a VW or Audi donor-mobile. The only serious downside is its heavy and rust-prone all-steel construction. If the Cortez had been made of alloy, like the GM coaches, and so many other many other coaches and RVs, there would almost certainly be a Cortez in our driveway. Weighing some 5000-6000 lbs, any modern fwd drivetrain would turn this into a 20-25 mpg motor home ready for the next half century. Too bad.
Although the Cortez may not have found gold for its makers, it certainly blazed new trails, and did much of the heavy lifting for the other front-wheel-drive motor homes that followed it.
Related reading:
This Clark Cortez Got Saved, But Went Up In Flames Within An Hour On The Drive Home
Curbside Classic: Ultra Van – Cross An Airplane With A Corvair For The Most Radical RV Ever
We bought a 1964 Clark Cortez about 8 months ago and spent 6 months completely redesigning/remodeling the interior. You can see what we did here: http://thevanproject.co/van-restoration/
Does any one know if James Krantz in Louisiana is still around? Is the Cortez, Inc. in Florida a part of the Cortez, Inc. in Louisiana?
My boss has a Cortez that he is trying to get up and going again. The engine is good, but the body is all rusted.
We are in the middle of restoring and upgrading a 68 Cortez rear door. You can follow our progress at https://www.facebook.com/padagotoo/
My uncle had a 1963 Cortez. He would take me and a cousin on month long cross country trips. Estes Park Colorado, Seattle, Glacier Park Montana. Always an adventure. Only 18 feet long but loads of room inside. Perfect for 3 – 4 people. And as I remember 14 – 15 MPG was the norm. A cruise speed of 55 mph is about right too. We always started our trips in the Los Angeles area and invariably had to start out on the I-5 going over the “Grape vine”. In the truck lane, 35 – 45 MPH. Driving over the Rocky Mountains was an adventure in itself. I
Had the pleasure? of doing transmission work on refurbished one in the 90’s. Don’t kno history but believe started out with slant six, as was had transplanted 500ci Cad with TH425 FWD. No pulling power train out front, had to drop sub-frame (suspension, eng and all.) then remove trans. Signs of fabrication, (and grounding out [rubbing]) all over & around. Actually had old Clark fork to assist. Years later did minor trans work on humungous Clark (with slant six) for construction company at LAX
We owned one back in the 60’s. Problems encountered have not been mentioned here. The ring gear was secured with rivets and the factory fix, after you sheared the rivets on a trip, was to replace them with AN bolts. Then the problem with front end alignment: 17 rod ends had cumulated slop that made it impossible to keep front end aligned so tires wore out in short order. Good idea to cross them every few thousand miles. Nostalgia beckons so I am looking for another one to spend final days in — I am almost there at 85.
PS: I think the Tornado power plant was a mistake.
Here is the latest news on Cortez s/n #29, featured in this article:
The primary ignition harness is installed and functional. Next step is the half-shaft & transaxle rebuild. My Cortez is taking its 5th tilt-back ride to a heavy truck maintenance shop in Orlando.
Did some cosmetics
If Anyone would like to contact me to talk Clark (or Kent) Cortez, please call, text or email me anytime! I bought THE Cortez in this article and am in process of it’s full restoration to the road.
Dana Merrill
407-968-9888
http://www.yinzair@gmail.com
Dana, Thanks for the update on your Cortez. I was very happy to find it and shoot it for this article, and I’m glad to know you’re making progress on it. All the best.
What did they use for front suspension? Looking to buy replacement bushing any help from anyone would help me. Ty
I just purchased this one in Az last month, not too rusty I hope. 1971 Cortez after a few weeks, I have it running and ready to drive,when I get the wheels back on it. I bought a 71 in 73 when i was 22. Had it ten years.I bought it at the plant in Kent,OH. They were closed but had a used one with about 20K miles. I had great fun, but due to young age, I did not put it away in the winter, and it rusted badly
Of Course, Thanks to Paul Nedermeyer for writing this excellent article about Cortez. It has some legs!
I would like to connect with anyone who would like to share info, memories; parts ideas, stories,etc. I have it at my place in AZ, but I am from Milwaukee,Wi. I have the factory parts manual and some Newsletters,etc, and Cortez National member list from 1993. I wonder how many owners from then are still around? Gary 414-578-6170
I found a Cortez executive office model 1968.
I’m selling a Slant 6 motor that was an extra that came off a different Cortez. Also an extra set of Rims and gas tank. please make offer and I can see if it will work out.
P.S
It was running last time it was in a Cortez.
Thanks Shawn
If anyone is interested in the interior of the executive suite let me know.
I have a 1966 Clark Cortez for sale. She is a beauty.
Hi Liz,
Is this ’66 Clark Cortez still available?
This one is:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cc-for-sale/cc-for-sale-save-parts-anybody-willing-to-adopt-a-rusty-clark-cortez-motor-home/
But hurry, if you’re interested.
Is it still for sale as of 12/2/2021? If it is, where is it located? What is the asking price?
If you’re looking for more up-to-date information on Cortezes, there is an active Facebook group called the Cascade Cortez club and there are regularly Cortezes there that are offered for sale.
So why exactly are rear doors on motorhomes considered obsolete? Seems like a good, practical arrangement to me.
I really like the low floor FWD motorhomes have and the glassy greenhouse and resultant forward view. But not hard to see why these weren’t huge sellers.
I agree that it seems like a practical arrangement.
But I can think of two reasons why it’s not done these days. 1) Seems like most RVs now have big, private bedrooms in the rear, and a door back there would not be compatible with that floorplan, and 2) Ingress/egress is tough when towing.
I’m not an RV’er though, so other folks may have better ideas, but that’s what comes to mind right away for me.
Notice: There is a 1968 Cortez that needs to be saved by July 26th, in Carson, CA. It has many upgrades but a rusty roof. Full details here:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cc-for-sale/cc-for-sale-save-parts-anybody-willing-to-adopt-a-rusty-clark-cortez-motor-home/
Sadly, that was the one that went up in flames. 🙁
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cc-for-sale/the-clark-cortez-got-saved-but-went-up-in-flames-within-an-hour-on-the-drive-home/
I own a 63 Cortez and would like to convert the drum brakes to disc brakes. I have the equipment and skills to do the fabrication and machining for custom caliper brackets, but not the knowledge to design them. This is my first old vehicle project and honestly I’m in over my head. It seems all the companies that provided these conversion kits are no longer around. Does anyone have specs they could share? I’d be willing to barter fabrication service. I’m in Atlanta.
I just found this post. Did you ever get this figured out for your rig? We have a ’68 and want to convert the drums to disc. I have found the specs for the mounting bracket. Other than that, the recommendation I’ve been told is to use the 1980-1986 ford f250 parts.
I haven’t gotten to this yet. I’ve gotten into the engine a bit and now its running great. I’ve also doing a bit of body work, replacing rusty parts.
Would you be willing to share the specs you found for the mounting bracket?
I’m attaching pics of the pdf files. Let me know if they don’t render well and I can email them to you. I’ve got pics of the install too.
This is the second schematic
Does that look like something you can fabricate?
I just wanted to reach out to see if you checked out those schematics? I’ve been looking for an alternative and am having a hard time. Just curious what you think?
I’ve got two schematics I found. And a handful of images. I’ll attach whatever I can. Might take a few posts.
Sorry, I tried to add the attachment and it wouldn’t go through. What’s the best way for me to get the schematics to you?
With apologies for nosing into the brake project, the print seems to represent a part based on a casting that would be prohibitively expensive to custom build.
Myself, I would hunt for an alternative, preferably based on a common production support that’s already “half built” and plate steel rather than cast.
There are lots of common plate steel caliper supports. An example would be ’80s-’90s fronts of K20 GM truck.
There used to be a really active Yahoo chat group before Yahoo closed it down. I wonder if the guy with the transaxle deal worked out? Only solution I’m aware of is a GM auto assembly or the Clark manual . I can remember being in the Battle Creek factory as a kid when my dad was doing plant work after hours . Sadly there was a gentleman in the Yahoo group that had brake kits fabbed up and other stuff fabbed that is now unobtainable. He had bushing and bering cross references . He was like a guru in the Cortez world and when he passed on he had all kinds of parts squirreled away. IIRC I think he was one of the original Kent 26 investors that bought it from Alco Standard. I think they finally bit the dust in 79. IIRC they sourced a lot of suspension gear from Ford on the Michigan built first series . I was a Yahoo member for a few years and yes Clark transmission division did become Tremec. I’ve heard of LS conversions BTW . I’m very curious if the gentleman ever found a driveline upgrade. I’ve loved these things since I was a kid and I’m 60 now. I grew up in Kalamazoo just down the road. BTW Battle Creeks other gift to the world other than cereal was the musician Del Shannon .
Del Shannon holds more interest for me than cereal or motor homes!
…have a lead on a free 20′ 63′ Cortez in Northern Calif. if anyone is interested? (…needs restoration).
Charlie
CC effect: speaking of compact RVs, I just read an article (a little dated, from Nov., 2021) on the ‘Tacozilla’, a new, compact retro-RV concept (no plans for production) using the Toyota Tacoma and inspired by the original seventies Toyota Chinook.
https://trailtacoma.com/2021/11/28/tacozilla-toyota-tacoma-chinook-inspired-custom-built-truck-camper/
looks about the size of my apt.
This has to be one of my favorite CC’s; thanks for rerunning it Paul. Not only does it cover a fascinating vehicle, with an example that’s still in use, but it spawned so many comments over the years. From former to current to prospective owners, with lots of memories but also useful resources. And, rereading it now makes me realize how inspirational the Cortez was for Paul’s own rear entry FWD six cylinder Dodge (sort of) motor home.
When I first saw “And Built Like A Forklift”, I thought, “Oh no, does it have rear steering?” But that would be impossible to implement safely in a vehicle meant to go on the highway.
The Lane Motor Museum built a replica of Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion car, which had a single steered rear wheel. The automotive writer from the Wall Street Journal briefly drove it, or watched someone from the museum drive it, a few years ago, and it was a handful. I thought, “Better him than me.”
My parents’ house had a large, gently sloping yard, and I used to ride my coaster wagon down the hill a la Calvin & Hobbes. I tried it a few times with the steered wheels at the uphill end, and I got an intuitive feel for why cars are steered by their front wheels.
Ahh, Clark forklifts, along with Hysters, one of the reasons my left ankle is mush, 35 years of hopping on and off these things up to 40 times a day. No sissy steps, just keep slamming that left foot onto concrete.
Also, no power steering on the ones I drove very early on, these were mid Sixties units, and kind of a test for new hires to see if they could handle what in those days was called “bull work.”
The good old days, lol.