There are a lot of Corvair fans here at CC. And why not? They’re the most unique American car of their time, are fun to drive and readily available at reasonable cost, and they have a dedicated club – the Corvair Society of America (CORSA). While the 1965-69 Corvairs are undeniably beautiful, I must admit my preference for the original 1960-1964 models. But what is the best Corvair? In my opinion, one good choice is the turbocharged 1962-1964 Monza Spyder. Let’s learn a bit more about these special Monzas…
Nineteen sixty-two was a big year for the Corvair, with the debut of the long-anticipated Monza convertible. Sharing a 108″ wheelbase and 180″ overall length with its sedan and coupe siblings, the convertible offered plenty of drop-top, bucket-seat, rear-engine goodness. It’s unclear why a convertible version wasn’t offered from the beginning, but perhaps Chevrolet felt it wouldn’t fit the Corvair’s originally intended role as a plain-Jane, American VW alternative–or at least they did until Spring 1960, when the Monza coupe brought some pizazz to the lineup.
But wait, there’s more! Optional on 1962 Monza coupes and convertibles (and introduced at about the same time as the convertible) was a turbocharged variant of the 145 cu in flat six. Now Corvair buyers could skip the standard 80-hp (and optional 102-hp) engines for a turbocharged version that produced 150 hp @ 4400 rpm. It was the world’s only second turbocharged car, arriving just a few months after the Olds Cutlass Jetfire, the first.
The extra cost for the Spyder was $317.45–a not inconsiderable sum, but not a bad buy considering it virtually doubled your Monza’s horsepower. So as not to hinder the Spyder’s performance potential, air conditioning, the three-speed stick and the Powerglide automatic were not available; the four-speed stick was mandatory. Other Spyder special features included full instrumentation with tach, a 120 mph speedometer, and, of course, Spyder identification.
Technically speaking, Spyder was an option package for the Monza, but most of the press and buying public regarded it as a separate model. At the time, GM was being run by engineers, not bean counters, as evidenced by the Corvair’s turbo mill, not to mention the Corvette’s independent rear suspension, the small block, soon-to-be-Rover Buick V8, and the “rope drive” Tempest. No wonder a young Mr. Niedermeyer spent so much time at Iowa City’s GM showrooms.
Moving 6,894 coupe and 2,574 convertible versions of such a driver-oriented package wasn’t a bad sales performance, so the Spyder continued for 1963. Along with the rest of the Corvair lineup, the Spyder received new trim and upholstery, but otherwise stayed pretty much the same for 1963. It would prove to be its best sales year, with 11,267 Spyder coupes and 7,472 convertibles finding happy new owners.
I can understand the attraction. Over at Porsche, the four-cylinder 356 sported 90 horsepower in its penultimate Super 90 form. Yet it cost almost 50% more than a Spyder coupe. Yes, the 356 Carrera 2 sported 155 hp (and the all-new flat six 911 was just around the corner), but it was very expensive and its four-cam engine was temperamental–not a good choice for a daily driver.
Although 1964 was the last year for the original Corvair, a number of worthwhile improvements were added nonetheless. In the engine department, displacement in the individually-finned, cast-iron cylinder barrels was increased to 164 cu in. The Spyder held at 150 hp, but its peak power now came a bit sooner, at 4,000 rpm. That enhanced its low-speed torque and reduced turbo lag, somewhat.
A worthwhile improvement shared with the other 1964 Corvairs was redesigned engine hardware and gaskets designed to improve oil sealing on the rocker arm covers. Also new–at long last–was the transverse rear leaf camber-compensating spring that GM’s bean counters had denied the original 1960 model.
A total of 199,387 Corvairs were built for the 1964 model year, a bit on the low side compared with the 254,571 sold the previous year. Its basic body had been around since the fall of 1959, which may have hindered sales in a market of annual model changes and biennial major sheetmetal changes. Complicating matters was the April 1964 smash introduction of the Ford Mustang, which no doubt siphoned off some Corvair shoppers.
Nineteen sixty-four also marked the last year for the Spyder nameplate. Sales for its final year totaled 6,480 coupes and 4,761 convertibles. One of those ’64 soft-tops is our featured CC, which I spotted at a recent Maple City Cruise Night, in Monmouth, Illinois. I was immediately attracted by its red and white color combination–and once I realized it was a Spyder, I was bitten.
Is that engine not a thing of beauty? One hundred-fifty horses of turbocharged goodness, and still room for a spare tire.
My love of white interiors is well known here at CC, and white upholstery is what initially drew me to this car. Combine it with a red dash and carpets, and you have a great look. This interior is surely a comfortable (and fun!) place to be for the lucky owner. Even better, this car has the optional four-speed manual–yours for an extra $92. Because the ’64’s larger engine had more torque, the previously mandatory four-speed became optional in 1963. I suspect there were very few three-speed Spyder made, though.
I was not the only admirer. Another spectator was clearly intrigued with this car, judging by his close attention and much fancier camera than my own. Corvairs do that to people.
Here we can see the special instruments, much cooler looking than the strip speedometer found on lesser ‘Vairs. The “Spyder” emblem on the glove box door was also unique to the model. If the full instrumentation didn’t tip you off, that emblem made it clear that you were riding in a very special Corvair.
While 1964 was the last year for the Spyder, it was not quite the end of the turbo engine. Among the all-new Corvairs for 1965 was the new and sporty Corsa (check this Evening Orchid drop-top I posted to the Cohort a while back). A normally aspirated, high-compression four-carb flat six with 140 hp was standard, but just $161 more bought a revised version of the old turbo engine, now good for 180 hp. After 1966, both it and the Corsa disappeared for good–but for one shining moment in the early- to mid-60s, your local Chevy dealer offered something really special. I think the owner of today’s CC knows that.
Every new Corvair post here makes me want one even more. This particular one in particular…
The real knock off wire wheels shown in one of the ads above were like a $900 option, they were seldom ordered.
In 1964 when I bought my new black Corvair Spyder the real wire wheels were just over $400, 405 I believe. I chose the wire hubcaps instead at about $80.
It was my first new car and I really liked it. Ran it at the drag strip and won a trophy in “I” stock. The only time I remember was 15.9 at 89 MPH.
Very much a fun car.
A very nice example. Someone has given that car a lot of love, which is heartening. The challenge Corvairs present is that while they do have a following, their values aren’t enormous. That means the price of entry is fairly reasonable and keeps people from getting as freaked out about originality as they would with other cars, but it also means that people are less apt to do really pristine restorations. Someone might polish up a good-condition survivor, but sadder ones seem to either linger on or end up being cannibalized. The cost of a 100-point restoration can easily exceed the potential resale value, so you have to be a serious Corvair fan to get into that.
Small point: the reason the Spyder wasn’t available with Powerglide was not related to performance, it was because the turbocharged engine didn’t have a wastegate, which created problems with overboost with automatic transmission. I assume the lack of a wastegate was another cost-cutting move, as the Olds Jetfire engine had a wastegate, in addition to water injection and various other tricks. (The Jetfire was available and commonly ordered with automatic.)
For once the bean counters did drivers a favor. One of my loves towards the Monza/Corsa was that there was no automatic available. Only real drivers need apply.
Yeah, too bad the Jetfire automatic was the junky roto-matic Hydra-Matic sans the fourth gear.
I think that the Roto-Hydramatic was always a 3 speed, even in the big cars.
You’re both right. The big Model 10 Roto Hydra-Matic used in full-sized Oldsmobiles and some big Pontiacs was also a three-speed.
However, in principle, both Roto Hydra-Matics were simplified, three-speed versions of the previous four-speed dual-coupling Hydra-Matic. To reduce weight, size, and manufacturing costs, GM removed the main fluid coupling and the front planetary gearset, added a stator to the secondary coupling to making it a torque converter, and reengineered the rear planetary, which previously had been used only for reverse.
There was an outtake I shot last year of a Corvair convertible, and I saw it again the other evening. It is amazing how small the first generation Corvair was compared with what’s on the roads nowadays. The Corvair sat in a line of traffic behind a Camry and in front of a 4Runner – it was positively teeny!.
A turbo Spyder convertible – red, white interior, 4 speed. Is this the holy grail of Corvair-dom?
It’s a bit deceptive too, because they’re not really all that small on the inside. But they sit quite low, and everything now is so tall. Ground clearance is a bit iffy, and the coils tend to sag with age.
Here’s my ’65 with my cousin’s EVO. The Corvair with 4″ of extra wheelbase is much roomier but then it has no trans tunnel, no creature comforts, no safety equipment/structure… The coils are cut on mine and it feels like I’m sitting on the street when I drive it.
I like it! Monochrome and alloys make it look like a modern retro version of a Corvair. I love this perfect original CC Spyder, and like this variation too. Would love to see better photos of yours.
Monochrome ‘Vair FTW! That is bad*ss!
One day last week I saw an early-50’s Plymouth and realized that its tall proportions aren’t as far off from some 2012 cars as you might expect. I have a ’64 Monza coupe, and in traffic I am looking up to just about anything other than Miatas. The problem that presents is that people seem to turn too closely in front of me more than they do when I am driving newer cars. I think they just don’t see me down there.
Man oh man, one of these days I’m going to buy a classic vehicle…
I like tis particular example…a lot!
I doubt I would buy a Corvair, but I like the latter versions the best, nicer styling.
The feature car brings back plenty of memories for me. My mother owned the red/white version. Some of my earliest memories of being in cars are in that car. At that age my siblings weren’t born yet. Dads thing was putting me on the tank of his Ducati and going to the beach for clams. Mom’s thing was putting the top down and going for ice cream.
All great memories except for one. That cars fate was getting T-boned in the drivers door. The car was totaled. I will have Mr Nader know that all occupants of the car walked away with minor scratches.
John
John, y’all were extremely lucky, or maybe it was a low speed accident, as it is obvious (I have one) that the early Corvair has little in the way of side impact protection. That is how the young man died who was involved in a crash with a teenaged Laura Bush in 1963. He was driving a Corvair when she missed a stop sign and T-boned him with her Impala.
Didn’t these cars have a problem of breaking the differentials? A friend of mine had a ’65 that was eternally on jack stands replacing the differential.
The differential didn’t hold much oil; hardly anyone ever checked it. This was a cause of some Corvair diffs. There were kits to put other engines in Corvairs, usually in the back seat area; the diffs held up OK with those.
Which is really dumb because ’64 Corvairs (not sure how many other years) are the easiest cars in the world to check the diff oil level — there is a dipstick for it in the engine compartment! However, you cannot fill it through the dipstick tube like a transmission — you have to go through the usual drill of getting under the car and finding the plug.
In 1962 – 1964, before the Mustang exploded on the scene, these were so hot: the only real small performance car from Detroit, and what a beauty. There were several in Iowa City, including a Spyder Convertible on my walk to school; it got lots of love from me. It really raised GM’s stock in my eyes, and then the ’63 Sting Ray appeared. 1962 – 1963 were the peak GM experience, bar none!
As a grade school kid, my best friend in 1st-3rd grade was Dominic Quinzon. His parents had a Lakewood Corvair wagon. Nick and I would be relegated to “the back” (as most baby boomer kids would ride in the back – no seat belts – no seat! Rambler advertising in the late ’50’s called the back cargo area of their wagons “the ideal mobile playpen area for children!”). Anyway, I loved the sound of that flat boxer six. I used to see a lot of the 1st gen Corvairs out and about in my childhood and Paul’s mention of revised oil seals explains why I remember seeing lots of 1st gen ‘vairs with clumps of oil sludge in that rear roll pan grille compared to not seeing this crud in newer ‘vairs.
BTW – Dominic’s family traded the ’61 Lakewood for a ’68 Datsun 510 wagon. This one with a stick. Again . . . Nick and I rode in the ‘way back (he had to older sisters, one younger one, and his father didn’t drive – old country gentleman – emigrated from the Philipines).
For some reason I have always been attracted to the Corvair. I think it may have been due to the fact that I love “Orphan” cars. Until I got my little gem, Betty-Ruth (pictured here) I had no idea how much of a following these sweeties had. My dad worked at Tonawanda Chevy plant in the 60’s and installed the #1 cylinder pistons in the Corvair engines. After I had a heart attack 2 years ago at a very young age, I had an epiphomy and decided to get a “Vair. I got this little gem off a Craigslist post with zero pictures of it, drove 10 hours with dad to almost Georgia and fell in love. (Gut intsincts told me to go and see it with no pictures). Trailered her back to St Pete and was so flipping proud driving down the interstate with her on a flat bed. Mom called me shortly after I got her home and said “You should name her Betty-Ruth, after both of your grandmothers”. Grammy Ruth died a few months later, and thankfully Grammy Betty is still with us and kicking but!. Betty-Ruth is a 1966 Monza 4 door Sport Sedan, 35,000 miles, PG 110 with factory air conditioning Lemonwood Yellow, and flawless black buckets interior. (original, not a Clarks Corvair replacement) She is the one pictured on the left with the stripes. I went to the local car show with her so proud to be the only guy sporting a yellow, 4 door air conditioned Corvair. I pulled in behind the car on the right, another Yellow, 4 door air conditioned Corvair. I told the guy he had to packup and leave, and today Jody (the other ‘Vair owner) is one of the BEST FRIENDS A guy could ask for!
Okay, NOW you have done it. Enough is enough! Just how many cars do you own? I WILL demand you show up at the N. Reddington Beach Doubletree Hotel if we come down there next month and give this old geezer and wifey a ride in at least ONE of them, but ALL of them would be a plus…!
Too many! I didn’t have toy cars as a kid, I had minibikes, bull dozers and back hoes. Dads toy box. I figured I paid my blood sacrifices to the motor gods over the years and got my own toy box full! We have 7 total, today anyways. Always on the hunt.
Ps. I managed hotels here for years and know half the staff at the dbl tree.
“Nineteen sixty-two was a big year for the Corvair, with the debut of the long-anticipated Monza convertible as well as the Lakewood station wagon.”
The Lakewood was actually introduced for 1961. For ’62 the wagon no longer had a special model name, consistent with Chevrolet having done the same with its full-size wagons. Its sales plummeted due to the introduction of the Chevy II wagon, so that was its last year. Wikipedia claims that there was a Monza wagon in 1962 only, which was a little bit different from the others: “The Monza wagon was available in 1962 and is not really a Lakewood. All window glass was specific to this model due to its taller roofline.”
“It’s unclear why a convertible version wasn’t offered from the beginning, but perhaps Chevrolet felt it wouldn’t fit the Corvair’s originally intended role as a plain-Jane, American VW alternative–or at least they did until Spring 1960, when the Monza coupe brought some pizazz to the lineup.”
IINM, none of the ’61 B-O-P “senior compacts” came as convertibles, either, but they also got them for ’62. The new Chevy II Nova also came as a convertible. The success of the Monza may have been what gave GM the idea to sell convertible versions of its “less than full-size” cars, but there were convertibles all around. By 1963 Ford and Chrysler had them in their compact lines, too.
That’s actually my bad; I added that about the wagon to Tom’s piece in a momentary brain fart. It’s gone now. Thanks for keeping us on our toes.
I agree with you about the convertibles; they were all engineered for the 1962 MY; probably wanted to spread the development costs a bit.
It may also have been a year or so before someone did a facepalm and realized that the Corvair’s niche was as a sporty car rather than as an econobox. The folks behind the Falcon and the Valiant had that same delayed reaction, although they may have also been reacting to rumors coming out of the Corvair project.
Partly, perhaps. But since the Corvair and the B-O-P compacts shared so much of their body structure, I’d say that the primary reason was a shared schedule with them on the various body styles: the wagons all came in 1961, and the convertibles in 1962. I’m also pretty sure it was intended all along
It does beg the question as to when the Monza was approved; was it a last minute rush job, or was it in the works for some time, as a staged introduction?
The Corvair originally arrived only as a four door; the coupe, even in 500 and 700 trim, didn’t arrive until mid-year along with the Monza. That tends to support the theory that the Monza was planned for some time; that Chevy intended to have an upgrade version of the Corvair all along. Which really stands to reason, given how profitable all upgrades were, and the success of the Impala. Hard to imagine them only planning on a spartan version.
The Corvair convertible was part of the plan all along, though they did come out in 62, this one off 1960 Corvair that was made for Sue Earl, Mrs Harley Earl was built like a Monza convertilbe, even though neither option actually existed at the time.
I’ve seen pictures of other 1960 Corvair convertible mock ups, with the 700 series trim like the car pictured here, with the high beltline chrome trim that was unique to the 700.
It also had power windows, which were never available on a Corvair, air conditioning and of course, the custom pink paint.
Apparently “Pinky” got consistently updated throughout it’s life, eventually receiving a reformatted version of one of the Hydramatics (I think it was the smaller series roto-hydramatic). It was outfitted with power windows, seats and locks and leather befitting a Cadillac.
Earl also comissioned the 1960 Super Monza, which had a Cadillac worthy interior, real wire wheels and a sunroof. It’s interesting because it has both Monza and 700 trim combined on one car.
The neat thing about the Monza wagon was that it had buckets in the front like the other Monza series cars, so you could have had a 4 speed Monza wagon with buckets and stick.
Like this one: https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-1962-corvair-monza-wagon-lakewood-why-did-we-go-ahead-and-build-this/
Even Studebaker got into the sporty compact act with the Lark Daytona (albeit a little late in the game). Monza was first in it’s field.
The red and white convertible is just WOW! The purple convertible is great, but the red and white is fantastic. A sergeant in the reserve unit I belonged to in the early 70’s bought a second generation Corvair. A red convertible with a ragged black top and tattered interior, in terrible condition, he paid $ 25 for the car.
The sergeant was a natural mechanic. His wife drove a pretty orange Rambler American convertible (about a 1966) which the sergeant lovingly referred to as his Rolls Royce. He considered his work fixing it up as the equivalent of a hand built Rolls.
I rode in the Corvair one time. I’m not certain what model it was, but I recall it had the upside down umbrella type badge on it. It rode relatively well for a beater. The guy was really proud of that car. I don’t really remember what happened to the car. I don’t think the guy did any major fix up. It was too far gone.
Back in the day, I never liked little cars like the featured Corvair. Now, I really have the bug for the little cars.
Count me among the Corvair faithful. My parents bought one of the first Corvairs in the fall of 1959 when my mom was “expecting” me. (I was already sort of there, but that’s what they did back then– they expected you.) It was a rather plain 4-door sedan, that they traded in on a Rambler American station wagon in the summer of 1964. For the summer of 1970, we briefly had a 1963 non- Spyder non-turbocharged Corvair convertible in the same red/white color scheme. Just seeing that round white cue-ball shifter knob brings back a lot of memories of rides to the ol’ swimmin’ hole.
Since all you guys like corvairs so much I went to look at this little creampuff. The ad says it was only driven to church by a little old lady. They aren’t sure what the mileage is because the speedometer glass is dirty. There is a little tear in the top but nothing a little needle and thread won’t fix. The salesman said they kept it behind the fence because of sneaky looking guys like me.
Anyway, I hope you like it and I think I can get a phone number if you want.
BTW in 1960/61 the corvair was the drivers ed model in the Dodge City HS. I enjoyed it then and remember trips all over new england in a later model corvair in the sixties. Haven’t thought much good about Ralph N. since it went away.
At a recent Sully Plantation Father’s Day Show in Northern VA, which attracts a wide range of interesting cars, my friend asked me if I would consider buying a special interest car. Despite not having beer available to focus my thinking, I said yes, either a ’65 or ’66 Corvette convertible, or a ’64 or later Corvair. These were the only cars that I could think of that remotely drove like the cars that we have today.
In 1969 when I was flush with cash from my taxi driving job, I bought my friend’s ’64 Monza convertible for $100. It was triple black-top, body and interior. It had the 110 horse engine and a 4-speed. It had issues but I loved driving it. It had a reputation for shedding parts but that was part of the romance. I bought quick steering arms and dual glass packs from nearby JC Whitney. Money well spent.
My roommate inherited a ’65 Vair. It had the Powerslide tranny but in all respects was a much better car than my ’64.
The Austin Healey club of Chicago held frequent autocrosses (gymkanas) in the Soldier Field parking lot. Numerous Corvairs were entered. I asked one Corvair owner what class he competed in. He said the same one the Mustangs run in. I thought, damn, he must be getting his ass handed to him. Au contraire he said, the Corvairs routinely whipped the Stangs.
I found an abandoned ’65 Corvair in a vacant lot in downtown Chicago. It had a perfect pair of buckets in it. I used my own Corvair to practice removing the seats. Stripping a car in Chicago was, at the time, punishable by loss of one’s manhood, future male issues, and condemnation to a lifetime of driving British cars. The buckets worked quite well in my ’60 Plymouth Fury.
The more these get featured here the more I feel the need to get one!
There’s a rumor that the low restriction muffler for these was the basis for the “Turbo Muffler” that used to be popular before Flowmaster came and muddied up exhaust notes..
A banner day at Curbside Classic. Not one, but two Corvair articles, and count me among the Corvair faithful; My parents brought me home from the hospital in their new 1960 plain-Jane 4-door ‘vair. Later on, in the summer of 1970, we briefly had a non-turbo non-spyder 1963 ‘vair convertible, red like the featured car. I remember how cool I thought the cue-ball shifter knob was… Well, everything about a Corvair is cool. To the 10-year-old kid who got to ride in that red convertible, “Nader” was the ultimate dirty word. And BTW, thanks to my fellow commentators for the additional Corvair trivia.
My fBIL had a 63 Monza Spyder Conv… I Much Preffered it Over My Other Future BIL Who Had A Red KarMan Ghia. conv.. The Dark Blue Corvair Monza Was Much better backseat.,
I Went On To like his cars thruout his Life…Tbird73 Park Avenue77. Continental 82, 86, Q45, BMW 745il…
the other vws , nissans, audi
Tom, just a wonderful write up for a much loved car! Love the original ads, all the more, after looking at these vintage ads it reminds me of how much has been lost in the selling of todays automobile. Back then, technical specs and pictures, pictures of the actual engine and turbocharger! We don’t seem to get this kind of info in today’s advertising…….
Nice job Tom. Our neighbors the Qunlans had a beautil gold convertible with white top and interior in the late 60’s. Had the wire wheels which was well worth the extra bucks. If I see one like that again, I’m buying it.
Is it just me? Hemmings Blog sure seems to echo topics that come up on the Curbside. Not that that’s a bad thing, mind you, not a bad thing at all. Today it’s an SIA Flashback of the ’63 Spyder.
I am restoring a 1965 Corsa coupe. Powertrain has been rebuilt and I am now turning my attention to the interior. I have purchased parts and supplies from most of the know Vair vendors and on Ebay, but I am searching for a less expensive price on the front bucket seat “buns or cushions”.
What other GM car; Nova, Tempest, Chevelle use the same front seat buns/cushions as the late model, 1965-1966 Corvair coupe?
does anybody know how much 1964 spyders came with the turbo package.
Found one here in europe ( netherlands/ Holland ) mint condition.
Never seen a turbo here before, like the car and thinking of buing it.
Have now 2 AMC Gremlins ( 72 and 75 with 360V8 ) 62 Continental, 69 Coupe de Ville and a 73 Eldorado Conv
All 1962-1964 Corvair Spyders were turbocharged. If it’s not turbocharged, than it’s not a genuine Spyder.
Starting in 1965, the Corsa replaced the Spyder, and its standard 140 hp engine was not turbocharged. The 180 hp turbo engine was optional in it.
A car very much ahead of its time. Would have been interesting to see what Chevy would have made of it if not for the Ralph Nader thing.
Does anyone know of way to see what vin number was the last 1964 Corvair Spyder made?
A 1961 White with Red Bucket Seats, and 3 Speed, Corvair Monza was my first experience with this Car. QUITE FRANKLY IT WAS A PILE OF SHIPQ as far as Handling, and NO VERSATILITY WITH THE 3 SPEED GERABOX FOR PASSING ON A 2 LANE ROAD! I HATED IT SO MUCH THAT I PURCHASED A 1964 WITH A VERSATILE 4 SPEED COUPLED TO THE HIGHER 105 HP MOTOR & THE IMPROVED SUSPENSION. CHEVY GOT IT RIGHT WITH THIS CAR! I LOVED DRIVING IT, AND WISH I STILL HAD IT! A good friend of mine got married in there Greater Detroit area. I live in Joliet, IL so Im arose early, and while dressed in comfortable clothes started out for the long Drive. I stopped at one of those BIG stops exclusive to Interstate Highways to make a PitStop. It was Lightly Raining, and when I returned to my Car there stood an Indiana Highway Patrolman making certain that I knew the IMPORTANCE of correct TIRE INFLATION. I assured him that I did, and also shared with him that my Car was a 1964 that Featured a SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED SUSPENSION OVER PREVIOUS CORVAIRS. He, of course, wasn’t familiar with that so I taught him something that day. I no longer recall what Car Magazine it was that told about the new Suspension however I’d read it and referenced it to the Patrolman.The rest of my journey was uneventful, but very ENJOYABLE. As stated I LOVED MY 1964 CORVAIR MONZA COUPE! I never/ever took a Fancy to there newer Body Style.
Great article!
In late 1965 when I was almost 17, I bought a yellow ‘64 Monza Spyder for $1000 saved working for $1.35 an hour at a Colonial grocery store in Atlanta. Wire wheel covers with spinners and an after market wood shift knob made it a great first car.
Had to learn how to replace a thrown engine belt with a big flat blade screwdriver inserted under belt on top pulley, then bump starter. Usually worked on first try, second for sure.
Was a great little car! Loved its peculiar Corvair engine sounds and brushed stainless dash with gauges.
I never liked Ralph Nader’x opinión of Corvairs!