The irrepressible Oscar Wilde subtitled his most famous play “A Trivial Comedy for Serious People,” a work whose protagonist was “Ernest in town and Jack in the country” because this double life freed him from tedious Victorian social obligations. In doing so, Wilde gently reminded us of the absurdity of our social constructs in a way that allowed him to brandish his rapid-fire brand of wordplay. While the name of Chrysler’s paradoxically named station wagon may or may not have been dedicated to one of Ireland’s wittiest scribes, it’s clear that its product planners wanted buyers to see themselves as fitting in anywhere, including perhaps a rural car lot in Northern Michigan, where I found this lopsided example back in October.
Decades before our featured Town and Country was pressed into service carrying the dog and kids, its nameplate was affixed to a much more dashing hero of a car, the wood-bodied Chrysler of the same name. Somehow, the thought of this Town and Country plying a sylvan country lane is more appropriate than our Newport-based feature wagon, the persona of which deserves an Oscar Wilde-like wink at ourselves to accept.
After all, false wood sides do not a real Town and Country make, in my opinion. This Town and Country is even more fraudulent than those that earned their name plates by way of their arboreal wallpaper, as the woodgrained flanks were ostensibly a delete option of which the original owner of this example took advantage. The idea here is less about fitting in anywhere than it is blending in anywhere, which isn’t exactly the same thing.
Being a plain, beige example of a wagon that few people saved, one may question how this wagon found its way to the salt belt in such solid condition. This Town and Country still wears an Idaho license plate; therefore, its owner most probably trod a similar path to mine with my ’65 Dart wagon (which had an Idaho title when I bought it from Wildcat Mopars in Oregon). Nearly rust-free derelicts being my purview, it’s no surprise that I was drawn to this behemoth, forlornly sitting on a blown out tire or three. Like my Dart, this Chrysler’s condition has progressed to the point of making an economical restoration impractical; however, there’s no reason not to resurrect it into a fun “beater,” as I did with the Dart.
The ’68 Town and Country might even be a better resurrected classic than my Dart. It’s certainly more powerful with its standard 383. It’s roomier, being available in six or nine-passenger versions. It’s easier to drive, with standard power steering and brakes, in addition to a standard Torqueflite (if my Standard Catalog of Chrysler is to be believed). It’s larger, so occasional errands to the home improvement store would be less confining. It’s more mellifluous, so fuel mileage may suffer from the temptation of its big-block’s bellowing. With all that being said, this Town and Country wore no “for sale” signs, but a man of my proclivities can’t help but imagine the possibilities.
Unlike the denouement of The Importance of Being Earnest, where all loose ends are conveniently tied up by a well-timed illustration of Deus ex machina (that involves incest if one is to apply the machinations of modern jurisprudence), the headliner and rear seat of the Chrysler may not be so lucky, nor may be the driver if the white substance on the front seat is firmly entrenched in the mold camp. Buyers take caution (and a respirator).
I did not check to see if this was a six-or-nine-passenger model, but there is plenty of room for a wagon-driving protagonist to go Bunburying.
Considering that The Importance of Being Earnest relies heavily on the concept of hiding one’s true identity and eventually being exposed, this wagon’s missing fender skirts become an appropriate plot device. On the other hand, real life doesn’t always solve itself as readily as fictional literature does. As an expert in the double entendre, Oscar Wilde was well-versed in nuance, but he may not have been able to procure a rare Chrysler sheetmetal stamping.
Oscar Wilde’s writing career abruptly came to an end after Earnest debuted, and that is a sad story of its own. Less tragic for anyone with a heart not made of minerals is the fact that this big Chrysler is the last for a while that wasn’t labeled “fuselage.” The story of the fuselage Chrysler has been told many a time here at CC, with many bemoaning the passing of its forebear.
But like interesting literature, interesting cars survive and are remembered by those who appreciate them for their noble qualities. We lost Oscar Wilde in the infancy of the motorcar, and he’d most likely use a zinger to describe any man who used his work as a metaphor to describe one; however, some things are too good to pass up.
Postscript: Check out this ’67 Town and Country on the AACA forum for $6000 (the Craigslist ad is probably gone):
1967 Chrysler Newport Town and Country Station Wagon
For further reading:
1968 Chrysler Town and Country – My Favorite Big Wagon by PN
Ouch!!!
I feel sooo sorry for this beast of burden.
Countless school and grocery runs, long distance vacation with the family crammed inside, visits to grandma & grandpa for the holidays.
I see it more as sculpture than just a wagon…sooo Americana!!
+1
As I commented on JPC’s post about his Newport equivalent to this T&C, I think that the front ends of these just-pre-fuselage Chryslers are some of the most attractive fronts for Chryslers.
It’s sad to see the condition that this one has wound up in. I fear it’s too far gone for a car that’s not exactly worth a lot. Still….Someone should save it. And whoever does might just want to consider changing the color. I’ve also always thought that shade of tan? brown-ish yellow? what?? is just horrid.
That Oscar Wilde thing was a very poor hook. Boring and cringy.
To each their own. I actually found it quite astute and appropriate.
Agreed
I always enjoy Aaron’s literary analogies – often because I’m unfamiliar with the referenced author’s works, and these articles often lead me to discover new things.
I’ll be less PC as usual and opine that if one doesn’t contribute their own work and post it for public discussion, then one should be quiet and not criticize others’ “hooks”. And those that do contribute realize that a contributor would never do such a thing anyway, it’s rude to say the very least. Factual errors (presumably with supporting documentation to the contrary) are always welcome to be pointed out. Or just enjoy the piece as is and if not, move on to another.
Not sure what E Hartmann was “rankled” about. “Oscar Wilde” seemed to touch a nerve for some odd reason.
Your comment is boring, cringy, unwelcome and a violation of our commenting policy (below). If I had seen it earlier, I would have deleted it. I’ll leave it up as a reminder to you and others.
Commenting at CC is a privilege, not a right. We review and moderate all comments. We insist that all commenting be kept civil, without any personal attacks on other commenters, the site, and its writers/contributors.
Thanks for having my back, everyone. Nobody likes for their work to be criticized, but at least I found a new Fantasy NASCAR team name for next season: “Boring and cringy.” 🙂
When someone objects to an Oscar Wilde reference, it’s often because they hate that they share certain similarities with Wilde—whether or (usually) not they admit it.
Meanwhile: “Boring and Cringey; how may I direct your call?”
🙂 🙂 🙂
Oscar Wilde is my favourite literary figure of the day. He most certainly did not deserve what happened to him, although he was partially responsible by insisting on a libel trial.
I doubt the original poster knew much about Mr Wilde, however,
Maybe not, but speaking from long-past experience of my own…maybe so.
m
t
e
(fwiw)
As a big fan of the 68 Chrysler in all of its flavors, I heartily approve. This poor beast, though, is in need of a rich and generous benefactor or it will be done for.
I love these big square Mopar wagons. A friend in high school drove his family’s 68 Fury wagon – the highest trim level without the wood. That was the only one of these I really spent time with. Someone was selling a red 68 Plymouth wagon at a car show some years ago – it was nice but a bit pricey and I didn’t need a car.
Are we looking at a broken leaf spring on the right rear corner?
My parent’s family wagon was a ’68 Plymouth Custom Suburban, no woodgrain trim. Fury II interior with Fury III exterior trim. Had from 1969 [used car] to 1975.
The Sport Suburban had VIP interior trim, but vinyl seats. How do I know? Cousins’ family had a ’68 Sport Suburban.
Lots of room with boxy body. Curved fuselages seemed to have less usable room. Grandfather had a ’69 Town & Country, roof felt lower. Just my memory, not factual data.
I didn’t look underneath, but I don’t think it had a broken spring; since the left front tire is the only one that held air, I believe that’s just the posture it’s taking.
Now that I look at the stance and the position of the shifter, I sort of wonder if it’s missing its drivetrain. That would be a shame if someone bought it only to strip its big block.
Aaron… thanks for the reminders… late 60’s T&C’s and Bunburying. My buddies and I used the term back then to describe when we were starting a new female relationship before ending a current one.
Somehow, I think that Oscar Wilde would approve of that word being used in that way. 🙂
To me, the name “Town and Country” seems like a classic early-to-mid 20th century phrase, so I’ve often found it surprising that the model endured for as long as it did… let alone into the 2000s in minivan form. The T&C nameplate outlasted many other Chrysler nameplates that seemed less anachronistic, so for that reason alone, I like these cars. And to find any T&C without woodgrain counts as an amazing find!
Incidentally, my wife was born at Baptist Hospital in Town and Country, Missouri. And for a random bit of trivia about that place: it was first incorporated as a “village” and later the charter was changed to make it a “city.” It was never a “town,” despite its name.
Town and Country, Missouri makes me think of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico…I’d love to live in a town with an interesting name.
I wonder if anyone is going to save this big hunk of Americana? I hope so.
It’s perfect. Find the owner, offer a thousand dollars that’ll get him/her to sign immediately without thinking about it or asking anyone else or finding your for sale link themselves and getting all delusional, drag it home, four new tires, an hour with a shop vac, another with a $3.19 bottle of 409 and some shop towels, maaaaaayyyyybbbbbeeeee a couple of hours of your expert ministrations in the engine bay and Bob’s Your Uncle you have a great new car fighting the Dirty Dart for driving time.
I wish this car were a little closer so I could keep an eye on it. I hope it finds a home! I hope it finds a home before I even consider offering money!
One thing that kept me from getting more information was that the day I took these pictures was the same day I bought the Riviera on BaT, so I was preoccupied with those thoughts. As fun as this would be, the Riviera dream was and is pretty strong. 🙂 Plus, my spouse might for once get legitimately mad if she had to ride in that interior, even after a decent cleaning.
I owned one of these in about 1974, I paid $125 for it with a bad fuel pump and fixed it for my then G.F. to drive .
It was a nice old car if HUGE .
I wound up needing to replace a U – Joint to sell it on, not a simple thing without jack nor safety stands .
I hope this one gets saved, apart from the damp interior it looks very solid .
-Nate
Aaron you could shoot for this as you said driver complete with Radio Flyer wagon. Well, maybe not Radio Flyer but that is the only lil red wagon name I know.
I have a couple old pedal cars; maybe that would work. 🙂
Quite possibly the 1967-1968 Chryslers were peak Chrysler, and the 1968 Chrysler Town and Country is peak Chrysler wagon, which might be for some folks peak wagon overall.
Of course I’m biased as our family had one as our daily driver in the mid-1980’s and we all basically learned to drive in it. Unbreakable, good handling for it’s size, great visibility, comfy, and looks pretty cool with/ and without the woodgrain.
It needs a roof rack, or whatever they called that unique station wagon accessory. Other than that it looks pretty good.
These big Chrysler wagons were the luxury SUVs of their time. Sure, there were other models in the lower priced line that were quite similar in size and specification, but the top of the line Chrysler, was always seen as something special and unique. They were used just as luxury SUVs are Today; vacation trips, towing boats and campers, ferrying loads of passengers to various events, and hauling any type of cargo the owner needed to transport.
In my eyes, the name, Town and Country always denoted upper middle class prestige and leisure. A nice home in the City and a cabin or vacation home at the lake, or in the snow country. These Chrysler owners could easily afford a Cadillac or an Imperial, but their active lifestyle benefited from having such a useful and flexible vehicle. Room enough to take a couple of relatives, or their kid’s friends along. I can imagine bringing the canoe to the lake in the Spring, lashed to the luggage carrier. I also imagine that the wagon was owned by one of those affluent, but gracious and generous, families that knew how to make everyone feel comfortable and accepted. Just like your favorite Aunt and Uncle.
It’s easy to see that I have concocted an entire vision of middle class reverie just by hearing the name, Town and Country.
Well done, Jose. 🙂
Our neighbors had a “68 Fury III”, wagon that was pretty “luxed up”.
Olds [1971] and Buick [1970] brought back full-size wagons to counter Chrysler and Mercury models. Last offered for 1964.
Before the first Oil Crisis, lots of them in Chicago burbs. And even after gas crunch, the 1977-79 B body Olds/Buick sold ok. Gas Crisis II was first wound to big wagons, then minivans, finally Utes.
I don’t remember the “side marker lights” being integrated into the front bumper like that. H’mm.
Yup, that’s how the side marker lights—no quotes needed—were done on the ’68 Chryslers.
I love a good metaphor, and Aaron, you never disappoint. Excellent tie-in and piece on a T&C that I hope is met with something other than the crusher, whatever the odds of that happening. And “arboreal wallpaper” is the descriptor of the day until I read something better.
Thanks Joe, that’s nice of you to say. Of course, we’re all chasing your heels when it comes to vivid descriptions. 🙂